Attachment Blue Sky-ASHC-SASC F

This document pretains to SCL-STA-20110315-00007 for Special Temporal Authority on a Submarine Cable Landing filing.

IBFS_SCLSTA2011031500007_875928

                 FOREIGN CARRIER AFFILIATION OF
AST TELECOM, LLC, D/B/A BLUE SKY COMMUNICATIONS, AMERICAN SAMOA
     HAWAII CABLE, LLC, AND SAMOA AMERICAN SAMOA CABLE, LLC



I.      INFORMATION REQUIRED BY 47 C.F.R. § 1.768: PRE-CONSUMMATION
        FOREIGN CARRIER AFFILIATION NOTIFICATION

        A.      Name of the Newly-Affiliated Foreign Carrier and the Country at the
                Foreign End of the Cable in Which It Is Authorized to Provide
                Telecommunications Services to the Public or Where It Owns or Controls a
                Cable Landing Station1

        AST Telecom, LLC, d/b/a Blue Sky Communications (“Blue Sky”), American Samoa

Hawaii Cable, LLC (“ASHC”), and Samoa American Samoa Cable, LLC (“SASC,” with Blue

Sky and ASHC, “Cable Landing Licensees”) propose to become affiliated with SamoaTel

Limited (“SamoaTel”). SamoaTel is authorized to provide telecommunications services in the

Independent State of Samoa (“Independent Samoa”) and also owns and controls the cable station

at Apia, Independent Samoa, where the American Samoa Hawaii cable system (“ASH Cable”)

lands. On January 21, 2011, Blue Sky entered into an agreement with the Government of

Independent Samoa to acquire control of SamoaTel. Blue Sky directly owns 68 percent of a

special-purpose subsidiary, Blue Sky SamoaTel Investments, Ltd. (“BSI”), which will, upon

consummation, directly own 75 percent of SamoaTel’s shares outstanding.

        The Cable Landing Licensees have filed this notification on paper, as there is no form

within the International Bureau Filing System (“IBFS”) for a foreign carrier affiliation

notification made pursuant to 47 C.F.R. § 1.768.2




1
     47 C.F.R. § 1.768(e)(1).
2
     See id. §§ 1.768(n), 1.1000 et seq. (requiring electronic filing where forms exist within
     IBFS).


Foreign Carrier Affiliation Notification of
AST Telecom LLC d/b/a Blue Sky Communications,
American Samoa Hawaii Cable, LLC, and
Samoa American Samoa Cable, LLC
15 March 2011
Page 2 of 32


       B.      WTO Status of Destination Country3

       Independent Samoa is not a WTO Member. Although Independent Samoa has applied

for WTO membership, it is currently a WTO observer.4

       C.      Name of the Cable System that is the Subject of the Notification, and the
               FCC File Numbers Under Which the License Was Granted 5

       This notification is made with respect to the ASH Cable, which the Commission licensed

on January 9, 2009. See FCC File No. SCL-LIC-200808l4-00016.6

       D.      Name, Address, Citizenship, and Principal Business of Any Person or Entity
               that Directly or Indirectly Owns at Least Ten (10) Percent of the Equity of
               Each of the Cable Landing Licensees, and the Percentage of Equity Owned
               by Each of Those Entities (to the Nearest One Percent)7

               1.     Existing Ownership of the Cable Landing Licensees

                      a.       Blue Sky

       Blue Sky is a wholly-owned, direct subsidiary of eLandia International, Inc.

(“eLandia”), a Delaware corporation. eLandia’s address is:

               8200 NW 52nd Terrace, Suite 102
               Miami, Florida 33166




3
    47 C.F.R. § 1.768(e)(2).
4
    See World Trade Organization, Accession Status: Samoa, available at
    http://www.wto.org/english/thewto_e/acc_e/a1_samoa_e.htm.
5
    47 C.F.R. § 1.768(e)(3).
6
    See Actions Taken Under Cable Landing License Act, Public Notice, 24 FCC Rcd. 226
    (2009) (“ASH Cable Landing License”).
7
    47 C.F.R. § 63.11(e)(5).


Foreign Carrier Affiliation Notification of
AST Telecom LLC d/b/a Blue Sky Communications,
American Samoa Hawaii Cable, LLC, and
Samoa American Samoa Cable, LLC
15 March 2011
Page 3 of 32


eLandia is a diversified holding company with investments in the information technology and

communications sectors. eLandia is currently controlled by Pete R. Pizarro through a voting

trust, described below. Mr. Pizarro is also an individual shareholder of eLandia, holding

approximately 2.75 percent of the issued and outstanding common shares of eLandia. Mr.

Pizarro is the Chief Executive Officer of eLandia, and is a U.S. citizen. Mr. Pizarro’s address is:

               c/o eLandia International, Inc.
               8200 NW 52nd Terrace, Suite 102
               Miami, Florida 33166

       The Voting Trust was established as part of eLandia’s capital structure reorganization in

February 2009. That transaction replaced Stanford International Bank Limited (“SIBL”) as the

majority owner of eLandia. SIBL was issued Voting Trust Certificates in exchange for SIBL’s

shares of eLandia. SIBL has become subject to a receivership imposed by the United States

District Court for the Northern District of Texas in connection with a lawsuit by the Securities

and Exchange Commission. The Receiver has “complete and exclusive control, possession, and

custody” of “the assets, monies, securities, properties, real and personal, tangible and intangible,

or whatever kind and description, wherever located” of SIBL.8 The Receiver confirmed by letter

dated June 2, 2009, to Pete Pizarro that “the assets and business operations of eLandia and its

subsidiaries are not part of the Receivership Estate. The Voting Trust Certificates are, however,




8
    See Amended Order Appointing Receiver, Securities and Exchange Commission v. Stanford
    Int’l Bank, Ltd., Case No. 3-09-cv-0298-N (N.D. Tex Mar. 12, 2009.), ¶¶ 1, 4.


Foreign Carrier Affiliation Notification of
AST Telecom LLC d/b/a Blue Sky Communications,
American Samoa Hawaii Cable, LLC, and
Samoa American Samoa Cable, LLC
15 March 2011
Page 4 of 32


a part of the Receivership Estate.”9 The Voting Trust now holds 44.75 percent of the common

stock of eLandia, and also holds non-voting preferred stock of eLandia. Under the Voting Trust,

Mr. Pizarro is given discretion to vote the eLandia common stock held by the Voting Trust on

most matters (and the Voting Trust Agreement sets forth voting requirements on the other

matters). Because Mr. Pizarro individually also owns 2.75 percent of the outstanding common

stock of eLandia, Mr. Pizarro now exercises the right to vote 47.50 percent of the voting shares

of eLandia, and has control of eLandia pursuant to the Communications Act of 1934, as

amended, and the Commission’s rules and regulations.10

        The Voting Trust agreement provides that Mr. Pizarro, as trustee, has both the “duty” and

“the full power and authority” to vote the shares in the Voting Trust as in the judgment of the

trustee may be for the best interest of eLandia “at all meetings of the stockholders” of eLandia

and “all actions to be taken by written consent of the stockholders” on any and all matters and

questions which may be brought before such meetings, including “in the election of directors.”11

The only limitation imposed by the Voting Trust on Mr. Pizarro’s voting power is a requirement

that Mr. Pizarro vote the shares in trust in the same proportion as the holders of the remaining

outstanding shares of common stock present and voting at any meeting of the stockholders with

9
     See Letter from Ralph S. Janvey, Receiver, to Pete R. Pizarro, CEO, eLandia International,
     Inc. (June 2, 2009) (emphasis added), filed as attachment to SEC Form 8-K filed by eLandia
     International, Inc. (June 3, 2009).
10
     See Stratos Global Corporation, Transferor, Robert M. Franklin, Transferee, Consolidated
     Application for Consent to Transfer of Control, Memorandum Opinion and Order and
     Declaratory Ruling, 22 FCC Rcd. 21,328 (Dec. 7, 2007) (holding that trustee with the power
     to vote shares is deemed to control shares in trust).
11
     Voting Trust Agreement § 4.2(a).


Foreign Carrier Affiliation Notification of
AST Telecom LLC d/b/a Blue Sky Communications,
American Samoa Hawaii Cable, LLC, and
Samoa American Samoa Cable, LLC
15 March 2011
Page 5 of 32


respect to the sale of eLandia whether by merger, consolidation, sale of all or substantially all the

assets, or other similar transaction and with respect to certain increases to the amount of shares

issuable pursuant to a stock option or other equity plan.12 Because Mr. Pizarro possesses voting

control of the shares deposited by SIBL in the Voting Trust, he is deemed to control those

shares.13 Following the consummation of the Proposed Acquisition (described below), Mr.

Pizarro will individually own and control 0.42 percent of the voting stock of eLandia.

                       b.      ASHC

         The American Samoa Government (“ASG”) owns 33.33 percent of the member interests

in ASHC. The ASG governs American Samoa, an unincorporated and unorganized territory of

the United States. Although the United States Congress has given plenary authority over

American Samoa to the U.S. Department of the Interior, the Secretary of the Interior has given

American Samoa the authority to draft its own constitution, under which the democratically

elected ASG functions through an executive branch led by the directly-elected governor and a

bicameral legislature, known as the Fono. The current governor is the Honorable Togiola T.A.

Tulafono, who maintains his office at the following address:

                 Office of the Governor
                 Executive Office Building
                 Third Floor, Utulei
                 Pago Pago, American Samoa 96799


12
     Id. § 4.2(b).
13
     Mr. Pizarro may not be terminated as trustee by SIBL. Mr. Pizarro will cease to be trustee
     when he ceases to be the Chief Executive Officer of eLandia, or upon his resignation, death,
     disability, bankruptcy, or breach of the Voting Trust. See id. § 6.1.


Foreign Carrier Affiliation Notification of
AST Telecom LLC d/b/a Blue Sky Communications,
American Samoa Hawaii Cable, LLC, and
Samoa American Samoa Cable, LLC
15 March 2011
Page 6 of 32


eLandia Technologies, Inc. (“ELT”) owns 66.66 percent of the member interests in ASHC. ELT

is a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Delaware. ELT is engaged in the

provision of telecommunications products and services and information technology. ELT’s

address is 8200 NW 52nd Terrace, Suite 102, Miami, Florida 33166. ELT is a wholly-owned,

direct subsidiary of eLandia, as described in part I.D.1.a above. Upon consummation of the

Proposed Acquisition, Amper will have an 84.88-percent direct interest in eLandia and a 56.58-

percent indirect interest in ASHC.

                      c.      SASC

        ASHC owns 100 percent of the member interests of SASC. ASHC’s ownership is

described in part I.D.1.b above.

               2.     Pending Transfer of Control of Cable Landing Licensees

        On July 29, 2010, eLandia entered into an agreement (“Contribution Agreement”) with

Amper, whereby Amper S.A. (“Amper”) will acquire approximately 84.88 percent of eLandia’s

issued and outstanding shares and, upon closing, indirectly control the Cable Landing Licensees

(“Proposed Acquisition”). Following the consummation of the Proposed Acquisition, the Cable

Landing Licensees will continue to exist as indirect subsidiaries of Amper. eLandia, Amper, the

Cable Landing Licensees, and their other affiliates have received Commission consent to the

transfers of control embodied in the Proposed Acquisition.14



14
     See IB Docket No. 10-229; FCC File Nos. SCL-T/C-20101022-00024, SCL-T/C-20101022-
     00025, SCL-T/C-20101022-00026, ITC-T/C-20101025-00425, ISP-PDR-20101022-00019;
     ULS Application Nos. 0004430192, 0004430196.


Foreign Carrier Affiliation Notification of
AST Telecom LLC d/b/a Blue Sky Communications,
American Samoa Hawaii Cable, LLC, and
Samoa American Samoa Cable, LLC
15 March 2011
Page 7 of 32


        Pursuant to the Contribution Agreement, Amper will acquire 165,705,913 shares of

eLandia’s newly issued common stock in exchange for the contribution to eLandia by Amper of

approximately 90 percent of the outstanding capital stock of Hemisferio Norte, S.A.

(“Hemisferio”). Hemisferio owns 100 percent of Hemisferio Sul Participaçoes Ltda.

(“Hemisferio Sul”), which owns 88.96 percent of Medidata Informática, S.A. (“Medidata”),

which owns 100 percent of XC Comercial e Exportadora Ltda. (“XC,” with Hemisferio,

Hemisferio Sul, and Medidata, the “Contributed Entities”). The shares of eLandia’s common

stock being issued to Amper will represent approximately 84.88 percent of eLandia’s issued and

outstanding shares of common stock following the closing of the transactions contemplated by

the Contribution Agreement.15

        In addition, the Contribution Agreement grants eLandia an option to buy Amper’s

remaining interest in Hemisferio in exchange for an option price of $8.9 million, payable by the

issuance of shares of eLandia common stock at a price per share equal to the fair market value of

a share of eLandia common stock as of the date of the exercise of the option (“Hemisferio

Option”). eLandia may exercise the Hemisferio Option within six months of the closing of the

Proposed Acquisition. eLandia’s exercise of the Hemisferio Option would significantly increase

Amper’s ownership of eLandia.

        The Proposed Acquisition will not terminate the ownership interests of eLandia’s current

shareholders. Rather, the current shareholders’ ownership shares will be diluted by eLandia’s


15
     For further detail and pre- and post-close ownership diagrams, please see the applications
     filed in IB Docket No. 10-229.


Foreign Carrier Affiliation Notification of
AST Telecom LLC d/b/a Blue Sky Communications,
American Samoa Hawaii Cable, LLC, and
Samoa American Samoa Cable, LLC
15 March 2011
Page 8 of 32


newly-issued common stock. The Voting Trust also currently holds non-voting preferred stock

of eLandia, which will convert to common shares of eLandia as part of the Proposed

Acquisition.16 In addition, pursuant to the Voting Trust agreement, following the Proposed

Acquisition, the Voting Trust will terminate, and ownership of the shares previously held by the

Voting Trust will revert to SIBL.17 The Receiver will have “complete and exclusive control,

possession, and custody” of those shares.18

        Amper is a Spanish sociedad anónima, i.e., corporation. It operates as a Spanish holding

company whose shares trade publicly on the Madrid Stock Exchange under the symbol AMP.

Amper’s operating units concentrate in three sectors: telecommunications, defense, and

homeland security. Neither Amper nor any of its existing subsidiaries is a telecommunications

carrier in any market. Amper’s address is:

                Calle Marconi, 3
                Parque Tecnológico Madrid
                28760 Tres Cantos Madrid
                Spain

Following consummation of the Proposed Acquisition, Amper will hold a direct 84.88 percent

interest in eLandia, and an indirect 84.88 percent interest in Blue Sky and a 56.58-percent

indirect interest in both ASHC and SASC.



16
     SIBL holds Voting Trust Certificates which entitle SIBL to dividends and distributions from
     eLandia, if any, in respect of the shares SIBL deposited in the Voting Trust.
17
     Voting Trust Agreement §§ 7, 8.
18
     See Amended Order Appointing Receiver, Securities and Exchange Commission v. Stanford
     Int’l Bank, Ltd., Case No. 3-09-cv-0298-N (N.D. Tex Mar. 12, 2009), ¶ 4.


Foreign Carrier Affiliation Notification of
AST Telecom LLC d/b/a Blue Sky Communications,
American Samoa Hawaii Cable, LLC, and
Samoa American Samoa Cable, LLC
15 March 2011
Page 9 of 32


        Amper’s only 10-percent-or-greater shareholder is Tvikap AB (“Tvikap”). Tvikap is a

Swedish aktiebolaget, i.e., corporation. Tvikap’s address is:

                Höllandargatan 27
                SE 113 59 Stockholm
                Sweden

Tvikap’s principal business is managing investments for institutional and private clients. Tvikap

is privately held, owned by more than forty (40) corporate and individual investors and has no

majority or controlling owner. Tvikap owns 22.011 percent of Amper’s shares. Following

consummation of the Proposed Acquisition, Tvikap will hold, on a fully-diluted basis, an indirect

18.68 percent interest in eLandia, and an indirect 18.68 percent interest in Blue Sky. Upon

consummation of the Proposed Acquisition, Tvikap will have, on a fully-diluted basis, an

indirect 12.46-percent interest in both ASHC and SASC.

        E.      Names of Any Interlocking Directorates with SamoaTel19

        None of the Cable Landing Licensees has any interlocking directorates with SamoaTel.

        F.      Basis of Notification and Projected Closing Date20

        This notification is made pursuant to 47 C.F.R. § 1.768(a)(1), as one of the Cable

Landing Licensees (Blue Sky) has entered into an agreement to purchase a controlling interest in

a foreign carrier (SamoaTel) that is authorized to operate in a market (Independent Samoa)

where the cable (the ASH Cable) lands.



19
     47 C.F.R. §§ 1.768(e)(5), 63.09(g).
20
     Id. § 1.768(e)(6).


Foreign Carrier Affiliation Notification of
AST Telecom LLC d/b/a Blue Sky Communications,
American Samoa Hawaii Cable, LLC, and
Samoa American Samoa Cable, LLC
15 March 2011
Page 10 of 32


        47 C.F.R. § 1.768(a) does not clearly require a prior notification of the proposed

affiliation by ASHC and SASC. Neither ASHC nor SASC is a parent entity of Blue Sky, so no

notification is required under 47 C.F.R. § 1.768(a)(1).21 Moreover, no foreign carrier is

acquiring an interest in ASHC or SASC, so no notification is required under 47 C.F.R.

§ 1.768(a)(2).22 Nevertheless, to avoid an unnecessary post-consummation filing by ASHC and

SASC (as post-consummation filing would still be required under Section 1.768(c) of the

Commission’s rules with respect to these licensees)23, those licensees are included within the

scope of this notification.

        Blue Sky’s acquisition of SamoaTel is expected to close on March 31, 2011.

        G.      Dominant/Non-Dominant Status

        During the pendency of this foreign carrier affiliation notification, each Cable Landing

Licensee has agreed, upon issuance of special temporary authority (“STA”), to be regulated as

dominant on the U.S.-Independent Samoa route. Nevertheless, upon approval of this foreign

carrier affiliation and cancellation or expiration of the STA, the Cable Landing Licensees seek to


21
     Id. § 1.768(a)(1) (requiring notification in the case of “[a]cquisition by the licensee, or by any
     entity that controls the licensee, or by any entity that directly or indirectly owns more than
     twenty-five percent (25%) of the capital stock of the licensee, of a controlling interest in a
     foreign carrier that is authorized to operate in a market where the cable lands”).
22
     Id. § 1.768(a)(2) (requiring notification in the case of “[a]cquisition of a direct or indirect
     interest greater than twenty-five percent (25%), or of a controlling interest, in the capital
     stock of the licensee by a foreign carrier that is authorized to operate in a market where the
     cable lands, or by an entity that controls such a foreign carrier.”).
23
     Id. § 1.768(c) (requiring that “[a]ny licensee that becomes affiliated with a foreign carrier and
     has not previously notified the Commission pursuant to the requirements of this section shall
     notify the Commission within thirty (30) days after consummation of the acquisition.”).


Foreign Carrier Affiliation Notification of
AST Telecom LLC d/b/a Blue Sky Communications,
American Samoa Hawaii Cable, LLC, and
Samoa American Samoa Cable, LLC
15 March 2011
Page 11 of 32


be regulated as non-dominant on the U.S.-Independent Samoa route, as SamoaTel lacks

sufficient market power on the foreign end of the route to affect competition adversely in the

U.S. market.

        But for SamoaTel’s market share in the market for fixed local termination (discussed

further below), ASLI would qualify for a presumption of non-dominance on the U.S.-

Independent Samoa route. The other relevant markets specified in 47 C.F.R. § 63.10(a) are not

at issue. There is no distinct market for intercity services given the tiny market of Independent

Samoa. As for the market for international facilities and services, Digicel and the Internet

service provider CSL have full access to SamoaTel’s cable station at Apia, as required by the

Samoa Regulator and operate their own international gateways.24 Moreover, the Cable Landing

Licensees estimate that Digicel Samoa holds approximately 60 percent market share for

international telecommunications services, whereas SamoaTel holds approximately 35 percent of

that market.

        Even in the market for local termination in Independent Samoa, however, SamoaTel

lacks market power as defined by the Commission. In evaluating market power on the foreign

end of the route which could affect competition adversely in the U.S. market, the Commission

focuses on:



24
     See Individual Licence Granted by the Regulator Under the Telecommunications Act 2005 to
     American Samoa Hawaii Cable, LLC, for the Establishment and Operation of a Submarine
     Cable System in Samoa, to Be Known as the Samoa-American Samoa Cable System § 10.1
     (May 2009) (“SAS Cable License”), attached as Exhibit 2 to this notification. ASHC later
     assigned its interest to SASC.


Foreign Carrier Affiliation Notification of
AST Telecom LLC d/b/a Blue Sky Communications,
American Samoa Hawaii Cable, LLC, and
Samoa American Samoa Cable, LLC
15 March 2011
Page 12 of 32


               (1) the foreign incumbent’s market share in the relevant terminating
               market on the foreign end of the particular route; (2) the supply elasticity
               of the market; (3) the demand elasticity of the market’s customers; and
               (4) the foreign incumbent’s cost structure, size, and resources. In
               evaluating market power, the Commission has recognized that neither
               market share, by itself, nor lower costs, sheer size, superior resources,
               financial strength, and technical capability, by themselves, confer market
               power. Indeed, the Commission has stated that, consistent with well-
               accepted economic principles, market conditions related to demand and
               supply elasticities are the more crucial determinants of a firm's market
               power. These conditions include the availability of close demand
               substitutes and ease of entry and expansion.25

        With respect to the first factor, SamoaTel’s market share in the Independent Samoa

market for local termination is small and has been shrinking. The predominant mode of

communications in Independent Samoa is mobile, rather than fixed. Independent Samoa’s

mobile sector is dominated by Digicel Samoa, with more than 80 percent market share. By the

Cable Landing Licensees’ estimate, Digicel Samoa has more than 50,000 (mobile) subscribers,

whereas SamoaTel has approximately 12,000 fixed subscribers and 13,000 mobile subscribers.

        With respect to the second factor, the Independent Samoa market for local termination is

characterized by significant supply elasticity. “Supply elasticity” is “a measure of the aggregate

propensity of firms to expand output of a commodity given an increase in the commodity’s price.

Two factors determine supply elasticity in a market. The first is the supply capacity of existing




25
     Americatel Corporation and Telecom Italia of North America, Inc.; Application to Modify
     Regulatory Classification From Dominant to Non-Dominant on the U.S.- Brazil Route,
     Memorandum Opinion and Order, 19 FCC Rcd. 9672, 9683-84 ¶ 20 (Int’l Bur. 2004)
     (“Americatel Brazil Order”).


Foreign Carrier Affiliation Notification of
AST Telecom LLC d/b/a Blue Sky Communications,
American Samoa Hawaii Cable, LLC, and
Samoa American Samoa Cable, LLC
15 March 2011
Page 13 of 32


competitors, and the second is low market entry barriers.”26 In a mere three years, Digicel

Samoa has captured more than 80 percent of the Independent Samoa mobile market and more

than 70 percent of the local market (accounting for both fixed and mobile services). Moreover,

as noted in parts II.A and B below, Independent Samoa has low market-entry barriers.

        With respect to the third factor, the Independent Samoa market for local termination is

characterized by significant demand elasticity. “Demand elasticity” is “a measure of the

propensity of an incumbent's customers to switch carriers or otherwise change the amount of

service that they purchase from an incumbent in response to given changes in price and

quality.”27 In a mere four-and-a-half years, Digicel Samoa’s subscriber based has swelled from

10,000 to 50,000, including many former SamoaTel subscribers. With respect to the fourth

factor, SamoaTel’s cost structure, size, resources and financial strength, and technical

capabilities do not confer advantages constituting market power. Most importantly, SamoaTel

does not receive subsidies from the Independent Samoa Government. For these reasons, the

Cable Landing Licensees believe that they qualify for non-dominant regulation on the U.S.-

Independent Samoa route.




26
     Americatel Corporation and Telecom Italia of North America, Inc.; Application to Modify
     Regulatory Classification from Dominant to Non-Dominant on the U.S.-Argentina Route,
     Memorandum Opinion and Order, 18 FCC Rcd. 26,811, 26,820-21 ¶ 16 n.81 (Int’l Bur.
     2003) (“Americatel Argentina Order”).
27
     Id. at 26,821 ¶ 16 n.82.


Foreign Carrier Affiliation Notification of
AST Telecom LLC d/b/a Blue Sky Communications,
American Samoa Hawaii Cable, LLC, and
Samoa American Samoa Cable, LLC
15 March 2011
Page 14 of 32


II.      INFORMATION REQUIRED BY 47 C.F.R. § 1.767(G)(2): EFFECTIVE
         COMPETITIVE OPPORTUNITIES SHOWING

          The Independent Samoa market offers effective opportunities for U.S. investors and

carriers to land and operate undersea cables in Independent Samoa. Independent Samoa has a

well-developed regulatory framework to permit licensing and market access, ensure

interconnection of foreign and domestic networks, safeguard competition, and enforce legal

requirements and safeguards. In fact, Independent Samoa has already demonstrated its openness

by licensing one of the Cable Landing Licensees party to this very notification—AHSC, a U.S.

limited-liability company organized in Delaware and ultimately owned by eLandia, a company

owned primarily by U.S. investors—to land and operate the ASH Cable segment between

Independent Samoa and the Territory of American Samoa.28

          The Cable Landing Licensees believe that the showings provided below satisfy the

requirements of the Commission’s effective competitive opportunities test as applied to a

proposed affiliation by cable landing licensees (Blue Sky, ASHC, and SASC) with a foreign

carrier (SamoaTel) in a non-WTO Member destination market (Independent Samoa) where the

undersea cable (ASH Cable) lands. The Cable Landing Licensees further believe it unnecessary

for the Commission to impose any conditions to address any public-interest harms, of which the

Cable Landing Licensees believe there are none. 29


28
      See SAS Cable License. ASHC later assigned this interest to SASC.
29
      See 47 C.F.R. § 1.768(g)(2) (stating that where “the foreign carrier is authorized to operate
      in, or own a cable landing station in, a non-WTO Member, the licensee must demonstrate
      that it continues to serve the public interest for it to retain its interest in the cable landing
      license for that segment of the cable that lands in the non-WTO destination market by


Foreign Carrier Affiliation Notification of
AST Telecom LLC d/b/a Blue Sky Communications,
American Samoa Hawaii Cable, LLC, and
Samoa American Samoa Cable, LLC
15 March 2011
Page 15 of 32



        A.      Background on the Independent Samoa Telecommunications Market and
                Regulatory and Investment Environments

        In 2005, Independent Samoa adopted the Telecommunications Act 2005, liberalizing the

Independent Samoa telecommunications market and opening it to competition.30 As detailed


     demonstrating either that the foreign carrier lacks market power in that destination market
     pursuant to § 63.10(a)(3) of this chapter or the market offers effective opportunities for U.S.
     companies to land and operate a submarine cable in that country.”); Rules and Policies on
     Foreign Participation in the U.S. Telecommunications Market, Market Entry and Regulation
     of Foreign-Affiliated Entities, Report and Order and Order on Reconsideration, 12 FCC Rcd.
     23,891, 23,946 ¶ 130 (1997) (“Foreign Participation Order”) (stating that “we will continue
     to apply an ECO test in this context as part of our analysis under Section 2 of the Submarine
     Cable Landing License Act. Thus, when considering an application to land and operate a
     submarine cable that will connect to a non-WTO Member country, we will consider whether
     the applicant is or is affiliated with a carrier that has market power in the destination market
     of the cable, and if so, we will consider whether that destination market offers effective
     opportunities for U.S. companies to land and operate a submarine cable in that country. We
     will also continue to consider, in addition to the de jure and de facto ECO criteria, other
     factors consistent with our discretion under the Submarine Cable Landing License Act that
     may weigh in favor of or against grant of a license.”) and Note to Paragraph (g)(2) (stating
     that “[t]he assessment of whether a destination market offers effective opportunities for U.S.
     companies to land and operate a submarine cable will be made under the standard established
     in Rules and Policies on Foreign Participation in the U.S. Telecommunications Market,
     Market Entry and Regulation of Foreign-Affiliated Entities, IB Docket Nos. 97–142 and 95–
     22, Report and Order and Order on Reconsideration, 12 FCC Rcd. 23891, 23946 at paragraph
     130, 62 FR 64741, December 9, 1997.”); “An act relating to the Landing and Operation of
     Submarine Cables in the United States” § 2, codified at 47 U.S.C. § 35 (“Cable Landing
     License Act”) (granting the President the right to deny a cable landing license to “assist in
     securing rights for the landing or operation of cables in foreign countries, or in maintaining
     the rights or interests of the United States or of its citizens in foreign countries, or will
     promote the security of the United States.”); Executive Order No. 10530 (May 10, 1954),
     codified at 3 C.F.R. 189 (1954-1958), reprinted in 3 U.S.C. § 301 app. (1988) (delegating
     licensing authority to the FCC).
30
     See Telecommunications Act (No. 20) 2005, as amended (“Telecommunications Act”),
     attached as Exhibit 1 to this notification and available at
     www.regulator.gov.ws/LegalFramework/TelecommunicationsAct/tabid/2978/language/en-
     US/Default.aspx.


Foreign Carrier Affiliation Notification of
AST Telecom LLC d/b/a Blue Sky Communications,
American Samoa Hawaii Cable, LLC, and
Samoa American Samoa Cable, LLC
15 March 2011
Page 16 of 32


below, the Telecommunications Act establishes a transparent and enforceable framework for

market entry, competition, regulation of market dominance, interconnection, and a host of other

sectoral matters.

        The Telecommunications Act also established the Office of the Regulator (“Regulator”)

as an independent and impartial regulator and tasks it with, among other responsibilities,

granting individual licenses (including licenses to land undersea cables in Independent Samoa);

fostering cost-based interconnection and competition in the telecommunications sector;

enforcing prohibitions on abuse of dominant market position and on other anticompetitive

activities; managing and licensing the radio spectrum; administering Independent Samoa’s

national numbering plan; ensuring protection of consumers and their network information; and

resolving telecommunications-related disputes. The Regulator is independent of the Minister of

Communications and Information Technology (“Minister”). Although the Regulator provides

policy advice to the Minister, the Regulator (and not the Minister) retains responsibility for

licensing and market-entry-related matters.31

        The Telecommunications Act prohibits a dominant service provider from abusing its

dominant market position.32 The Regulator is charged with regulating such abuses of dominant




31
     See Telecommunications Act §§ 8, 22. The Minister retains particular responsibility with
     respect to universal access and the universal access fund, see id. §§ 21, 22, and also makes
     interim appointments until a new Regulator is appointed by Independent Samoa’s head of
     state, see id. § 6(4).
32
     See id. § 27.


Foreign Carrier Affiliation Notification of
AST Telecom LLC d/b/a Blue Sky Communications,
American Samoa Hawaii Cable, LLC, and
Samoa American Samoa Cable, LLC
15 March 2011
Page 17 of 32


market position, whether sua sponte or in response to a complaint,33 and has exercised its powers

to do so. Moreover, the Telecommunications Act establishes a variety of remedies to be

imposed at the Regulator’s discretion upon a finding of abuse of dominant market position.34

        Independent Samoa maintains a very open approach to foreign investment. It does not

impose foreign investment restrictions in the telecommunications sector (including undersea

cables), much less particular restrictions for classes or types of service.35

        B.      Under Independent Samoa’s Telecommunications Regulatory Framework,
                U.S. Investors and Carriers Are Permitted to Land and Operate Undersea
                Cables in Independent Samoa

        U.S. investors and carriers have the legal ability to enter the Independent Samoa market

to land and operate undersea cables in Independent Samoa. The Telecommunications Act

requires a license for the landing and operation of undersea cables but does not impose

limitations on the number of licenses or licensees or foreign ownership in licensees.36 The

Regulator has promulgated detailed rules setting forth license application criteria and application


33
     See id. § 29.
34
     See id. § 30.
35
     See Foreign Investment Act (No. 3) 2000, as amended (“Foreign Investment Act”), available
     at www.samoa.ws/parliament/documents/acts/FOREIGN_INVESTMENT_ACT_2000_-
     _ENGLISH.pdf and attached as Exhibit 3 to this notification. Foreign investment is barred
     only in the following sectors: buses for transportation of the general public; taxis; vehicles
     for hire; retailing; and sawmilling. See id., Schedule – Reserved List. Foreign investment is
     also limited to 40 percent for fishing vessels with shareholders. See Ministry of Commerce,
     Industry and Labour (“MCIL”), Information Booklet on Procedures for Setting Up a
     Business, at 3 (Feb. 2007), available at
     www.mcil.gov.ws/idipd/forms/setup_information_booklet.pdf.
36
     See Telecommunications Act §§ 12-17.


Foreign Carrier Affiliation Notification of
AST Telecom LLC d/b/a Blue Sky Communications,
American Samoa Hawaii Cable, LLC, and
Samoa American Samoa Cable, LLC
15 March 2011
Page 18 of 32


processing timeframes.37 Similarly, the Licensing Rules do not impose limitations on the

number of licenses or licensees or foreign ownership in licensees.38

        Foreign investors, including foreign investors in the telecommunications sector, must

obtain a Foreign Investment Certificate from the Independent Samoa Ministry of Commerce,

Industry and Labour.39 The MCIL has previously granted such certificates to foreign investors in

Independent Samoa’s telecommunications market but declined to require such a certificate for a

foreign-owned undersea cable landing in Independent Samoa.40 The Cable Landing Licensees

therefore believe that this showing regarding Independent Samoa’s licensing and investment

framework, taken together with the showings in part II.A. above and parts II.C-E below, satisfies

the requirements of Section 1.768(g)(2) of the Commission’s rules, the Foreign Participation

Order, the Cable Landing License Act, and Executive Order No. 10530.41




37
     See Rules for the Licensing of Telecommunications Services and the Ownership or Operation
     of Telecommunications Networks in Samoa (effective Mar. 21, 2006) (“Licensing Rules”),
     attached as Exhibit 4 to this notification.
38
     See id.
39
     See Interim Guidelines: Application for a Foreign Investment Certificate in Samoa,
     available at www.mcil.gov.ws/idipd/forms/guidelines_FIC_app.pdf and attached as Exhibit
     5 to this notification.
40
     For example, Digicel Samoa received such a certificate in connection with its acquisition of
     Telecom Samoa Cellular Limited. It did not require the issuance of such a certificate for
     ASHC or its assignee, SASC.
41
     See 47 C.F.R. § 1.768(g)(2).


Foreign Carrier Affiliation Notification of
AST Telecom LLC d/b/a Blue Sky Communications,
American Samoa Hawaii Cable, LLC, and
Samoa American Samoa Cable, LLC
15 March 2011
Page 19 of 32


        C.     Independent Samoa’s Interconnection Regime Ensures the Ability of U.S.
               Investors and Carriers to Operate Undersea Cables in Independent Samoa

        Independent Samoa’s telecommunications regulatory framework mandates reasonable

and nondiscriminatory charges, terms and conditions for interconnection to a foreign carrier’s

domestic facilities for termination and origination of international services. Independent Samoa

has adopted and implemented a transparent, pro-competitive interconnection regime focused on

preventing abuses of dominant market position. This framework therefore ensures the ability of

U.S. investors and carriers to operate undersea cables in Independent Samoa by ensuring their

ability to terminate or pick up originating traffic in Independent Samoa.

        At the most general level, the Telecommunications Act tasks the Regulator with

promoting “adequate, efficient and cost-oriented interconnection of telecommunications

networks and access by service providers to telecommunications facilities of other service

providers” and to establish an open, non-discriminatory and commercially viable regulatory

framework for interconnection and access with a view to minimizing regulatory and other

barriers to entry into telecommunication markets.”42 The Telecommunications Act directs the

Regulator to impose interconnection arrangements and rates in the event that private negotiations

fail and to resolve interconnection disputes among service providers. 43

        Independent Samoa’s regulatory framework includes many detailed legal requirements

for interconnection:


42
     See Telecommunications Act § 32.
43
     See id.


Foreign Carrier Affiliation Notification of
AST Telecom LLC d/b/a Blue Sky Communications,
American Samoa Hawaii Cable, LLC, and
Samoa American Samoa Cable, LLC
15 March 2011
Page 20 of 32


     •   Duty to Negotiate in Good Faith. Upon receipt of a written request by another service

         provider, a service provider must enter into good-faith negotiations to enter into an

         interconnection agreement to “connect and keep connected the telecommunications

         networks of both service providers” and “provide access to such telecommunications

         facilities, including but not limited to central officers and other switching equipment

         locations, mast sites, towers, poles, subscriber access lines and underground facilities, as

         are reasonably requested in order for the service providers to provide telecommunications

         to their customers.”44

     •   Deemed Violations of Duty to Interconnect. The Telecommunications Act deems the

         following acts and omissions as violations of the duty to negotiate in good faith to

         interconnect:

                (a) obstructing or delaying negotiations, or failing to make reasonable
                efforts to resolve outstanding disputes; (b) refusing to provide information
                about a service provider’s own telecommunications services or
                telecommunications network or other facilities that are necessary for the
                interconnection arrangements; (c) misleading or coercing a party into
                reaching an agreement the party would not otherwise have made; (d)
                interfering in any way with a service provider’s ability to communicate
                with the Regulator, including having a service provider sign a
                nondisclosure agreement that preludes the service provider from providing
                information requested by the Regulator; or (e) refusing to permit
                amendment of the interconnection agreement to take into account changes
                in circumstances, including changes to this Act, a regulation or rule.45
44
     See id. § 33.
45
     See id. The Telecommunications Act further defines as abuses of dominant market position
     the “failing to supply essential facilities to a competitor within a reasonable time after a
     request and on reasonable conditions, or discriminating in the provision of interconnection or
     other telecommunications service providers; except under circumstances that are objectively
     justified based on differences in supply conditions, including different costs or a shortage of


Foreign Carrier Affiliation Notification of
AST Telecom LLC d/b/a Blue Sky Communications,
American Samoa Hawaii Cable, LLC, and
Samoa American Samoa Cable, LLC
15 March 2011
Page 21 of 32



     •   Requests for Interconnection. Interconnection arrangements offered by a dominant

         service provider must comply with the Telecommunications Act and any rules and

         policies developed by the Regulator. Such offers must “be no less favourable than any

         reference interconnection offer that has been approved by the Regulator for the service

         provider.” The dominant service provider must “meet all reasonable requests for

         interconnection with the dominant service provider’s telecommunications network at any

         technically feasible point” and “in all other respects, incorporate reasonable terms and

         conditions, including technical standards and specifications.” A dominant service

         provider must: apply “similar conditions to all interconnecting service providers under

         similar circumstances;” provide “interconnection to interconnecting service providers

         under substantially the same conditions and of substantially the same quality as it

         provides for the dominant service provider’s own telecommunications services, or those

         of the dominant service provider’s affiliates;” make “available on request all necessary or

         reasonably required information and interconnection;” and use only “information

         received from a service provider seeking interconnection for the purposes for which such

         information was supplied and does not disclose the information or otherwise use the

         information to obtain a competitive advantage.”46



     available facilities or resources” and the “failing to comply with the interconnection
     obligations of a dominant service provider specified in Part VII” of the Telecommunications
     Act. See id. § 29.
46
     See id. § 35.


Foreign Carrier Affiliation Notification of
AST Telecom LLC d/b/a Blue Sky Communications,
American Samoa Hawaii Cable, LLC, and
Samoa American Samoa Cable, LLC
15 March 2011
Page 22 of 32


     •   Interconnection Charges. A dominant service provider must maintain cost-based

         interconnection charges. Such charges must comport with the Telecommunications Act

         and any rules and policies developed by the Regulator, “including any pricing, costing

         and cost separation guidelines established by order of the Regulator.” The Regulator

         may, at its discretion, require advance approval for a dominant service provider’s

         interconnection charges.47

     •   Reference Interconnection Offers. A dominant service provider must prepare a

         reference interconnection offer (“RIO”) for approval by the Regulator within the time

         period specified by order of the Regulator. The RIO must include a full list of services to

         be supplied to service providers, setting out the associated terms and conditions,

         including the charges for each service. The dominant service provider must periodically

         update its RIO. The RIO must comply with the Telecommunications Act and any rules

         and policies developed by the Regulator.48

     •   Publication of Interconnection Agreements. A dominant service provider must file a

         copy of any interconnection agreement with the Regulator within 10 days of execution,

         after which time the Regulator will publish the agreement on its web site.49




47
     See id. § 36.
48
     See id. § 37.
49
     See id. § 38.


Foreign Carrier Affiliation Notification of
AST Telecom LLC d/b/a Blue Sky Communications,
American Samoa Hawaii Cable, LLC, and
Samoa American Samoa Cable, LLC
15 March 2011
Page 23 of 32


     •   Non-Compliant Interconnection Agreements. If the Regulator determines that an

         interconnection agreement does not comply with the Act, the Regulator may order the

         parties to amend the agreement.50

         The Regulator has established fixed and mobile network interconnection rates applicable

to SamoaTel and Digicel Samoa, the two principal service providers in the market and the only

ones designated as dominant in the provision of a particular service.51 SamoaTel and Digicel

Samoa were unable to reach agreement in private negotiations, so the Regulator intervened to

establish interconnection rates. The current rates are effective until September 30, 2013 unless

modified by the Regulator:

                Fixed Termination Rate: The cost based rate for terminating calls on the
                SamoaTel fixed network that originate on any mobile network in Samoa
                shall be 3.3 sene per minute.

                Mobile Terminating Rate: The cost based rate for terminating on any
                mobile network in Samoa shall be 17.7 sene per minute. (Where this rate
                applies to calls originating in the fixed network or another mobile
                network.)

                SMS: The charge for terminating an SMS message shall be 5 sene per
                message.

                Directory Services: The charge for a call to directory enquiries for
                subscribers to SamoaTel shall not exceed 27 sene per call and all future
                reductions that might be implemented for this service to the customers of
                SamoaTel will be passed on to the Digicel customers in the same
                percentage.



50
     See id. § 39.
51
     47 C.F.R. § 63.11(k)(3)(ii).


Foreign Carrier Affiliation Notification of
AST Telecom LLC d/b/a Blue Sky Communications,
American Samoa Hawaii Cable, LLC, and
Samoa American Samoa Cable, LLC
15 March 2011
Page 24 of 32


               Inbound International calls: The parties will charge each other the
               relevant international transit rate as included in the parties’ agreement
               which has been approved by the Regulator. If the agreement is terminated
               and is not replaced by a similar agreement, approved by the Regulator, the
               Regulator shall determine the rates to apply to all incoming international
               calls transiting their network and destined for the mobile customers of the
               mobile network of the other party.

               Outbound International Traffic: The Parties will charge each other a
               rate not to exceed that charged to its own customers for traffic to similar
               destinations and any applicable volume discounts.52

The Cable Landing Licensees therefore believe that this showing regarding the interconnection

regime in Independent Samoa, taken together with the showings in parts II.A and B above and

parts II.D and E below, satisfies the requirements of Section 1.768(g)(2) of the Commission’s




52
     The tala is the Independent Samoa currency. One tala is divided into 100 sene and is
     currently worth approximately US$0.42. These interconnection rates superseded a series of
     orders establishing interim interconnection rates and dating back to 2006. See Replacement
     Interconnection Charges Applicable to Digicel (Samoa) Limited and SamoaTel Limited,
     Order No. 2009/03, available at www.regulator.gov.ws/Portals/112/Order2009%2003.pdf;
     Replacement Interconnection Charges applicable to Digicel (Samoa) Limited and SamoaTel
     Limited, Order No. 2009/02, available at
     www.regulator.gov.ws/Portals/112/Order2009%2002.pdf; Interim Interconnection Charges
     applicable to Digicel (Samoa) Limited and SamoaTel Limited, Order No. 2009/01, available
     at www.regulator.gov.ws/Portals/112/Order%202009%2001.pdf; Interim Interconnection
     Charges, Order No. 2008/03, available at
     www.regulator.gov.ws/Portals/112/documents/legal/Orders/2007-
     4,%20Interconnection%20rate%20order.pdf; Fixed and Mobile Network Interconnection
     Terminating Rates, Order No. 2007/4, available at
     www.regulator.gov.ws/Portals/112/documents/legal/Orders/2007-
     4,%20Interconnection%20rate%20order.pdf; Interim Interconnection Rates for Fixed and
     GSM Systems, Order No. 2006/4, available at
     www.regulator.gov.ws/Portals/112/documents/legal/Orders/2006-
     4,%20Interconnect%20Rate%20Order.pdf.


Foreign Carrier Affiliation Notification of
AST Telecom LLC d/b/a Blue Sky Communications,
American Samoa Hawaii Cable, LLC, and
Samoa American Samoa Cable, LLC
15 March 2011
Page 25 of 32


rules, the Foreign Participation Order, the Cable Landing License Act, and Executive Order No.

10530.53

        D.      Independent Samoa’s Telecommunications Regulatory Framework
                Establishes Competitive Safeguards that Ensure the Ability of U.S. Investors
                and Carriers to Operate Undersea Cables in Independent Samoa

        Independent Samoa’s telecommunications regulatory framework establishes competitive

safeguards to protect against anticompetitive practices. These safeguards further ensure the

ability of U.S. investors and carriers to operate undersea cables in Independent Samoa.

        First, Independent Samoa’s telecommunications regulatory framework establishes cost-

allocation rules in the foreign country to prevent cross-subsidization. The Telecommunications

Act specifically defines as an abuse of dominant market power:

                [U]sing revenues or the allocation of costs from one telecommunications
                service to cross-subsidize a competitive telecommunications service with
                the objective of lessening competition, except where such cross subsidy is
                specifically approved by order of the Regulator or by approval of tariffs
                for relevant telecommunications services. 54

As noted in part II.A above, the Regulator is charged with enforcing this requirement and

applying statutory remedies as necessary.

        Second, Independent Samoa’s telecommunications regulatory framework establishes

timely and nondiscriminatory disclosure of technical information needed to use, or interconnect

with, carriers’ facilities. The Telecommunications Act specifically defines as an abuse of

dominant market power:

53
     See 47 C.F.R. § 1.768(g)(2).
54
     Telecommunications Act § 27(h)(iv).


Foreign Carrier Affiliation Notification of
AST Telecom LLC d/b/a Blue Sky Communications,
American Samoa Hawaii Cable, LLC, and
Samoa American Samoa Cable, LLC
15 March 2011
Page 26 of 32


                    [the] failing to make available to other service providers on a timely basis
                    technical specifications, information about essential facilities or other
                    commercially relevant formation which is required by such other service
                    providers to provide telecommunications services and which is not
                    available from other sources” where such action has “the effect of
                    impeding or preventing a competitor’s entry into, or expansion in, a
                    market.55

As noted in part II.A above, the Regulator is charged with enforcing this requirement and

applying statutory remedies as necessary.

         Third, Independent Samoa’s telecommunications regulatory framework protects carrier

and customer proprietary information. “Except as permitted or required by law, or with the

consent of the person to whom the personal information relates, a service provider shall not

collect, use, maintain or disclose customer information or customer communication for

undisclosed purposes.”56 The Telecommunications Act also requires that “[t]he purposes for

which customer information is collected by a service provider shall be identified at or before

collection, and a service provider shall not, subject to this section, collect, use, maintain or

disclose customer information for undisclosed purposes.”57 Service provides must ensure the

accuracy and completeness of customer information, and ensure that both customer information




55
     Id. See also id. § 13(6) (providing that “[l]icences for service providers that provide the same
     telecommunications services or own or operate the same telecommunications networks shall
     not unfairly discriminate between such licensees.”).
56
     Id. § 50(2).
57
     Id. § 50(3).


Foreign Carrier Affiliation Notification of
AST Telecom LLC d/b/a Blue Sky Communications,
American Samoa Hawaii Cable, LLC, and
Samoa American Samoa Cable, LLC
15 March 2011
Page 27 of 32


and communications “are protected by security safeguards that are appropriate to the sensitivity

of such information and communications.”58

         Independent Samoa’s regulatory framework includes numerous other safeguards to guard

against anticompetitive conduct. The Telecommunications Act specifically prohibits

arrangements between two or more service providers that:

     •   “directly or indirectly fix the prices or other terms or conditions of telecommunications
         services in telecommunications markets;”
     •   “directly or indirectly determine which person will win a contract or business opportunity
         in a telecommunications market;” or
     •   “apportion, share or allocate telecommunications markets among themselves or other
         service providers.”59

         As noted in part II.A above, the Telecommunications Act also prohibits a dominant

service provider from abusing its dominant market position.60 Such abuses are defined to

include (in addition to those discussed above) the following:

     •   “[B]undling of telecommunications services, whereby the service provider requires, as a
         condition of supplying a service to a competitor, that the competitor does not require;”
     •   “[O]ffering a competitor more favourable terms or conditions that are not justified by
         cost differences if the competitor acquired another service that the competitor does not
         require;”
     •   “[P]re-emptively acquiring or securing scarce facilities or resources, including but not
         limited to rights of way, required by another service provider for the operation of such
         service provider’s business, with the effect of denying the use of the facilities or
         resources to such service provider;”



58
     Id. §§ 50(4), (5).
59
     See id. § 28.
60
     See id. § 27.


Foreign Carrier Affiliation Notification of
AST Telecom LLC d/b/a Blue Sky Communications,
American Samoa Hawaii Cable, LLC, and
Samoa American Samoa Cable, LLC
15 March 2011
Page 28 of 32


     •   “[S]upplying competitive telecommunications services at prices below long run average
         incremental costs or such other cost standard as may be established by the Regulator;”
     •   “[P]erforming any of the following actions, where such actions have the effect of
         impeding or preventing a competitor’s entry into, or expansion in, a market:”
     •   “[D]eliberately reducing the margin of profit available to a competitor that requires
         wholesale telecommunications services from the dominant service provider, by
         increasing the prices for the wholesale telecommunications services required by that
         competitor, or decreasing the prices of the retail telecommunications services in markets
         where they compete, or both;”
     •   “[R]equiring or inducing a supplier to refrain from selling to a competitor;”
     •   “[A]dopting technical specifications for networks or systems to deliberately prevent
         interoperability with a network or system of a competitor;”
     •   “[F]ailing to make available to other service providers on a timely basis technical
         specifications, information about essential facilitie[s] or other commercially relevant
         [in]formation which is required by such other service providers to provide
         telecommunications services and which is not available from other sources;”
     •   “[U]sing information obtained from competitors for purposes related to interconnection
         of supply of telecommunications services by the dominant service provider to compete
         with such competitors;” and
     •   “[A]ny other action or activity engaged in by a dominant service provider that the
         Regulator determines in accordance with section 29 [of the Telecommunications Act] to
         have the effect, or likely to have the effect, of materially restricting or distorting
         competition in a telecommunications market.61

The Cable Landing Licensees therefore believe that this showing regarding Independent Samoa’s

competitive safeguards, taken together with the showings in part II.A-C above and part II.E

below, satisfies the requirements of Section 1.768(g)(2) of the Commission’s rules, the Foreign

Participation Order, the Cable Landing License Act, and Executive Order No. 10530.62




61
     See id.
62
     See 47 C.F.R. § 1.768(g)(2).


Foreign Carrier Affiliation Notification of
AST Telecom LLC d/b/a Blue Sky Communications,
American Samoa Hawaii Cable, LLC, and
Samoa American Samoa Cable, LLC
15 March 2011
Page 29 of 32


        E.     Independent Samoa Has an Effective Regulatory Framework for Developing,
               Implementing, and Enforcing Legal Requirements, Interconnection
               Arrangements, and Other Safeguards, Thereby Ensuring the Ability of U.S.
               Investors and Carriers to Operate Undersea Cables in Independent Samoa

        Independent Samoa has an effective regulatory framework for developing, implementing,

and enforcing legal requirements, interconnection arrangements, and other safeguards. As

discussed in parts II.A-D above, the Telecommunications Act itself establishes detailed legal

requirements for the Independent Samoa telecommunications sector. It tasks the Regulator with

enforcing these requirements and safeguards and arms the Regulator with a variety of

enforcement remedies. The Cable Landing Licensees therefore believe that Independent

Samoa’s regulatory framework for developing, implementing, and enforcing legal requirements,

interconnection arrangements, and competitive safeguards ensures the ability of U.S. investors

and carriers to operate undersea cables in Independent Samoa

        Independent Samoa’s regulatory framework is no mere formality. To the contrary, the

Regulator has used the full range of its powers under the Telecommunications Act to advance its

pro-competitive, consumer protection, and market development mandates. The Regulator has

issued findings of market dominance in particular sectors.63 It has considered and resolved


63
     See, e.g., Digicel Dominance Order, No. 2006/6 (finding Digicel Samoa dominant in the
     cellular radio market), available at
     www.regulator.gov.ws/Portals/112/documents/legal/Orders/2006-
     6,%20Digicel%20Dominance%20Order.pdf; SamoaTel Dominance Order for International
     ISP Connectivity, No. 2006/5 (finding SamoaTel dominant in the international Internet
     access services market), available at
     www.regulator.gov.ws/Portals/112/documents/legal/Orders/2006-
     5,%20Samoa%20Tel%20IP%20Dominance%20Order.pdf; Telecom Samoa Cellular
     Dominance Order for Cellular Radio Systems, No. 2006/2 (finding TSCL dominant in the


Foreign Carrier Affiliation Notification of
AST Telecom LLC d/b/a Blue Sky Communications,
American Samoa Hawaii Cable, LLC, and
Samoa American Samoa Cable, LLC
15 March 2011
Page 30 of 32


interconnection disputes between licensed carriers64 and ordered interconnection and imposed

interconnection rates between the dominant service providers SamoaTel and Digicel Samoa.65 It

has set retail rates for dominant service providers.66 It has also resolved complaints by one

service provider against another.67 The Cable Landing Licensees therefore believe that this



     cellular mobile market), available at
     www.regulator.gov.ws/Portals/112/documents/legal/Orders/2006-
     2,%20Order%20Designating%20a%20Dominant%20Service%20Provider%20%28TSCL%2
     9.pdf; SamoaTel Dominance Order for fixed line telephony and interconnection No. 2006/1
     (finding SamoaTel dominant in the fixed-line public telephony and interconnection to fixed-
     line networks markets), available at
     www.regulator.gov.ws/Portals/112/documents/legal/Orders/2006-
     1,%20Order%20Designating%20a%20Dominant%20Service%20Provider%20%28SamoaTe
     l%29.pdf.
64
     See, e.g., Refusal by SamoaTel to Interconnect with Digicel’s DigiFixed Service, Order No.
     2010/02 (ordering SamoaTel to interconnect with Digicel’s DigiFixed service and ordering
     Digicel to refrain from charging customers retail rates below the mobile termination rates as
     determined by the Regulator in Order 2010/01), available at
     www.regulator.gov.ws/Portals/112/Order%202010.01%20-
     %20Cost%20Based%20Rates.pdf; Refusal by SamoaTel to Interconnect with Digicel’s Fixed
     Wireless Service, Order No. 2009/04 (ordering SamoaTel to interconnect with Digicel’s
     fixed wireless service), available at
     www.regulator.gov.ws/Portals/112/Order2009%2004%20-
     SamoaTel%20to%20interconnect%20with%20Digifixed.pdf.
65
     See part II.D above.
66
     See, e.g., Approval of Changes to Retail Pricing Structure for SamoaTel Limited, Order No.
     2008/02, available at www.regulator.gov.ws/Portals/112/documents/legal/Orders/2008-
     02,%20Approval%20of%20Changes%20to%20Retail%20Pricing%20Structure%20for%20S
     amoaTel%20Limited.pdf; Order for New SamoaTel Fixed to Mobile Rates, Order No.
     2008/1, available at www.regulator.gov.ws/Portals/112/documents/legal/Orders/2008-
     1,%20SamoaTel%20mobile%20rate%20order.pdf.
67
     See, e.g., SamoaTel Limited’s Complaint against Digicel (Samoa) Limited’s LCR/Sim Box
     Units, Order No. 2010/03 (ordering Digicel to reprogram all least-cost router (“LCR”) units,
     refrain from charging customers retail rates below the mobile termination rates as
     determined by the Regulator in Order 2010/01, provide the Regulator with evidence of


Foreign Carrier Affiliation Notification of
AST Telecom LLC d/b/a Blue Sky Communications,
American Samoa Hawaii Cable, LLC, and
Samoa American Samoa Cable, LLC
15 March 2011
Page 31 of 32


showing regarding Independent Samoa’s development, implementation, and enforcement of its

telecommunications regulatory framework, taken together with the showings in parts II.A-D

above, satisfies the requirements of Section 1.768(g)(2) of the Commission’s rules, the Foreign

Participation Order, the Cable Landing License Act, and Executive Order No. 10530.68


III.      CERTIFICATIONS

          A.      Accuracy-of-Information Certification69

          By the signature below, each Cable Landing Licensees certifies that it shall maintain the

continuing accuracy of information provided pursuant to 47 C.F.R. § 1.768, for a period of 45

days after the filing of this notification and will file a corrected notification with the Commission

as promptly as possible during this period, and in any event within 10 days unless good cause is

shown, in the event that the information is no longer accurate during the 45-day period.

          B.      Certification re the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 198870

          By the signature below, each of the Cable Landing Licensees certifies that no party to this

application is subject to a denial of federal benefits under Section 5301 of the Anti-Drug Abuse

Act of 1988, as amended.




       regulatory approval for retail rates charged for LCR services, and submit to the Regulator
       copies of contracts between Digicel Samoa Limited and its LCR customers), available at
       http://www.regulator.gov.ws/Portals/112/Use_Order2010.03.pdf.
68
       See 47 C.F.R. § 1.768(g)(2).
69
       See id. § 1.767(h).
70
       See id. §§ 1.767(a)(8), 63.18(o).


Foreign Carrier Affiliation Notification of
AST Telecom LLC d/b/a Blue Sky Communications,
American Samoa Hawaii Cable, LLC, and
Samoa American Samoa Cable, LLC
15 March 2011
Page 32 of 32


                                         CONCLUSION

       The Cable Landing Licensees hereby request expedient approval of this foreign-carrier

affiliation notification in order to allow timely closing on its acquisition of SamoaTel.




                                              ________________________

Kent D. Bressie                               Adolfo Montenegro
WILTSHIRE & GRANNIS LLP
1200 18th Street, N.W.                        President and Chief Executive Officer
Suite 1200                                    AST TELECOM, LLC,
Washington, D.C. 20036                        D/B/A BLUE SKY COMMUNICATIONS
+1 202 730 1337 tel
                                              President
Counsel for AST Telecom, LLC,                 AMERICAN SAMOA HAWAII CABLE, LLC
d/b/a Blue Sky Communications,
American Samoa Hawaii Cable, LLC, and         President
Samoa American Samoa Cable, LLC               SAMOA AMERICAN SAMOA CABLE, LLC


                                              P.O. Box 478
                                              Pago Pago, American Samoa 96799
                                              +1 684 699 2759 tel

15 March 2011


                                         CERTIFICATION

        I certify that I am an officer of AST Telecom, LLC, d/b/a Blue Sky Communications,

American Samoa Hawaii Cable, LLC, and Samoa American Samoa Cable, LLC; that I have

examined the foregoing notification and that to the best of my knowledge, information and

belief, all statements of fact contained in this notification are true.




                                                ________________________

                                                Adolfo Montenegro

                                                President and Chief Executive Officer
                                                AST TELECOM, LLC,
                                                D/B/A BLUE SKY COMMUNICATIONS

                                                President
                                                AMERICAN SAMOA HAWAII CABLE, LLC

                                                President
                                                SAMOA AMERICAN SAMOA CABLE, LLC

Executed on March 15, 2011


                                 LIST OF EXHIBITS


Exhibit 1:   Telecommunications Act (No. 20) 2005, as amended

Exhibit 2:   Individual Licence Granted by the Regulator Under the Telecommunications
             Act 2005 to American Samoa Hawaii Cable, LLC, for the Establishment and
             Operation of a Submarine Cable System in Samoa, to Be Known as the
             Samoa-American Samoa Cable System (May 2009)

Exhibit 3:   Foreign Investment Act (No. 3) 2000, as amended

Exhibit 4:   Rule for the Licensing of Telecommunications Services and the Ownership or
             Operation of Telecommunications Networks in Samoa

Exhibit 5:   Guidelines: Application for a Foreign Investment Certificate in Samoa



Document Created: 2011-03-15 20:14:48
Document Modified: 2011-03-15 20:14:48

© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC