Attachment Narrative

This document pretains to SAT-STA-20120924-00153 for Special Temporal Authority on a Satellite Space Stations filing.

IBFS_SATSTA2012092400153_967320

                                     Before the
                       FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
                                Washington, D.C. 20554


                                                     )
In the Matter of                                     )
                                                     )
ECHOSTAR SATELLITE OPERATING                         )   File No. SAT-STA-2012_________
CORPORATION                                          )   Call Sign S2232
                                                     )
Application for Special Temporary Authority to       )
Operate EchoStar 6 at 76.95° W.L. for 180 Days       )
                                                     )


                APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL TEMPORARY AUTHORITY

       By this Application, EchoStar Satellite Operating Corporation (“ESOC”) requests a grant

of Special Temporary Authority (“STA”) under Section 25.120(b)(2) of the Commission’s

rules,1 for 180 days to operate the EchoStar 6 satellite from the 76.95º W.L. orbital location.

EchoStar currently holds an STA under Section 25.120(b)(3) of the Commission’s rules2 to

operate EchoStar 6 from 76.95º W.L. orbital location, which expires on October 5, 2012.3

EchoStar requested a 60-day renewal of its current STA.4

       Since February 2011, the satellite has been operating under 60-day STAs issued by the

Commission based on the expectation that EchoStar 6 would become a Mexican-licensed

satellite. After consultation with the Commission and in light of the satellite’s limited remaining

       1
           47 C.F.R. § 25.120(b)(2).
       2
           47 C.F.R. § 25.120(b)(3).
       3
         See Stamp Grant, File No. SAT-STA-20120801-00124 (granted Aug. 7, 2012). The
technical parameters of the satellite and its operations were provided in the Technical Annex and
Schedule S submitted with the original STA application. See File No. SAT-STA-20110207-
00026 (granted Feb. 11, 2011).
       4
           See File No. SAT-STA-20120914-00150 (filed Sept. 14, 2012).


life, EchoStar has concluded that the reflagging is no longer necessary, and therefore intends to

withdraw its reflagging application (and related requests for authority) upon grant of the

requested 180-day STA, thereby avoiding unnecessary expenditure of Commission resources.

I.      BACKGROUND

        The nominal 77º W.L. orbital location is allotted to Mexico under the Region 2

Broadcasting-Satellite Service plan set forth in Appendices 30 and 30A to the International

Radio Regulations. In addition to the EchoStar 6 satellite, ESOC currently operates two Direct

Broadcast Satellite (“DBS”) service satellites at the nominal 77° W.L. orbital location under

Mexican authority issued to its partner, QuetzSat, S. de R.L. de C.V. (“QuetzSat”): EchoStar 1

and EchoStar 8. The satellites are used by EchoStar’s customers, DISH Network L.L.C.

(“DISH”) and DISH Mexico, to provide DBS service in the United States and Mexico,

respectively. The U.S. service includes local-into-local and Spanish-language programming in a

number of markets in the southern United States. EchoStar 6, operating with EchoStar 1 and

EchoStar 8 at 77° W.L., will continue to provide sufficient capacity to avoid service disruptions

from that slot in the event any of the satellites experiences a problem. EchoStar 1, a satellite

launched in December 1995, has limited capability (only up to 16 transponders), but EchoStar 8

is fully functional.

        EchoStar 6 arrived at the 76.95° W.L. orbital location on February 13, 2011, and began

providing service on February 14, 2011. The relocation was prompted by a single event upset

that temporarily affected the EchoStar 8 satellite.5 On March 14, 2011, ESOC’s parent company,

EchoStar Corporation (“EchoStar”), filed an application to transfer the satellite to QuetzSat,


        5
         See Letter from Petra A. Vorwig, Counsel for EchoStar Corporation, to Marlene H.
Dortch, Secretary, FCC, File No. SAT-T/C-20090217-00026 (Feb. 1, 2011).


                                                -2-


intending to operate the satellite under Mexican authority from the 76.95° W.L. orbital location.6

EchoStar also filed an application to modify its blanket earth station authorization to provide

service from the Mexican-licensed EchoStar 6 satellite.7 As ESOC notified the Commission,

ESOC has been operating EchoStar 6 at 76.95º W.L. at an inclined orbit beginning since

December 12, 2011.8

       As mentioned, given the short period of time remaining before the end of EchoStar 6’s

useful life,9 these applications are no longer necessary, and EchoStar has decided to withdraw

them subject to grant of the instant STA request. The Mexican concessionaire for the 77° W.L.

orbital location has informed COFETEL of this plan, and EchoStar understands that COFETEL

has no objection to the continued operations of the EchoStar 6 satellite in the 77º W.L. cluster

under the requested STA.

II.    GRANT OF THIS APPLICATION IS IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST

       Grant of ESOC’s STA to operate EchoStar 6 at 76.95° W.L. under Section 25.120(b)(2)

of the Commission’s rules is in the public interest because it will continue to ensure the provision


       6
         See File No. SAT-T/C-20110314-00054 (filed Mar. 14, 2011). On April 21, 2011, the
Commission consented to the pro forma assignment of EchoStar’s authorization to launch and
operate EchoStar 6 to ESOC. See File No. SAT-ASG-20110224-00033 (granted Apr. 21, 2011).
The pro forma assignment was consummated on May 23, 2011. See Letter from Pantelis
Michalopoulos and L. Lisa Sandoval, Counsel for EchoStar Corporation and EchoStar Satellite
Operating Corporation, to Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary, FCC, File No. SAT-ASG-20110224-
00033 (May 23, 2011).
       7
        See File No. SES-MFS-20110314-00288 (filed Mar. 14, 2011) (“Blanket Earth Station
Application”).
       8
         Letter from Pantelis Michalopoulos, Counsel for EchoStar Corporation, to Marlene H.
Dortch, Secretary, FCC, File No. SAT-STA-20111004-00194 (Dec. 2, 2011).
       9
        See Letter from Pantelis Michalopoulos and Christopher Bjornson, Counsel for
EchoStar Corporation, to Stephen Duall, International Bureau, FCC, File No. SAT-MOD-
20100720-00164 (Sept. 27, 2010).



                                               -3-


of DBS service to the United States, including the provision of local-into-local and Spanish-

language service in the southern United States. It will also ensure continuity of receipt of both

national and local programming for the subscribers of EchoStar’s customers by providing spare

capacity at 77° W.L. in the event EchoStar 1 or EchoStar 8 suffers a problem. Additionally,

operating EchoStar 6 at an inclined orbit will extend the time that the satellite is able to provide

services to customers.

       The continued operation of EchoStar 6 at 76.95º W.L. will not cause harmful interference

to any other U.S.-licensed satellite operator. There is no DBS orbital location in the vicinity of

77° W.L. that is assigned to the United States (the closest U.S. orbital location is 61.5° W.L., an

orbital location in which only ESOC operates DBS satellites). There will likewise be no harmful

interference from the operation of an additional satellite at 76.95° W.L. into Canada’s DBS

allotments at 72.5º W.L. and 82º W.L. There is an existing coordination agreement between

Mexico and Canada regarding the Mexican 77° W.L. orbital location and the Canadian orbital

locations 82° W.L. and 72.5° W.L. ESOC will operate EchoStar 6 within the specifications of

this coordination agreement. ESOC will also abide by the conditions imposed on the original

STA grant for EchoStar 6 at 61.5° W.L.,10 and the Commission’s requirements for inclined orbit

operations.11

       Finally, the continued operation of the EchoStar 6 satellite at 76.95º W.L. will not create

any risk of in-orbit collision. EchoStar 6 will be maintained within +/- 0.05º east/west station-


       10
            See Stamp Grant, File No. SAT-STA-20110207-00026 (granted Feb. 11, 2011).
       11
          See 47 C.F.R. § 25.280(b). These requirements are intended to ensure that a satellite’s
inclined orbit operations cause no more radio frequency interference to adjacent satellites than
would a satellite operating without an inclined orbit. See Mitigation of Orbital Debris, Second
Report and Order, 19 FCC Rcd. 11567, 11586-87 ¶ 45 n.129 (2004).



                                                -4-


keeping, which will ensure that its station-keeping volume will not overlap with ESOC’s own

satellites at 77º W.L.

III.   WAIVER PURSUANT TO SECTION 304 OF THE ACT

       In accordance with Section 304 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended,

47 U.S.C. § 304, ESOC hereby waives any claim to the use of any particular frequency or of the

electromagnetic spectrum as against the regulatory power of the United States because of the

previous use of the same, whether by license or otherwise.

IV.    CONCLUSION

       For the foregoing reasons, ESOC respectfully requests the grant of its application for

special temporary authority under Section 25.120(b)(2) of the Commission’s rules to operate

EchoStar 6 at the 76.95° W.L. orbital location for a period of 180 days.


                                             Respectfully submitted,



                                                      /s/
Pantelis Michalopoulos                        Alison Minea
Christopher Bjornson                          Corporate Counsel
Steptoe & Johnson LLP                         EchoStar Satellite Operating Corporation
1330 Connecticut Avenue, NW                   1110 Vermont Avenue, NW, Suite 750
Washington, D.C. 20036                        Washington, D.C. 20005
(202) 429-3000                                (202) 293-0981
Counsel for EchoStar Satellite Operating
Corporation


September 24, 2012




                                               -5-



Document Created: 2012-09-24 15:50:21
Document Modified: 2012-09-24 15:50:21

© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC