Redacted Filing.PDF

SUPPLEMENT submitted by EchoStar Satellite Operating Corporation

STA Amendment (Redacted Filing)

2011-07-07

This document pretains to SAT-STA-20110627-00122 for Special Temporal Authority on a Satellite Space Stations filing.

IBFS_SATSTA2011062700122_904565

Pantelis Michalopoulos                                                           1330 Connecticut Avenue, NW
202.429.6494                                                                      Washington, DC 20036-1795
pmichalo@steptoe.com                                                                        Tel 202.429.3000
                                                                                            Fax 202.429.3902
                                                                                                  steptoe.com




July 6, 2011

Via IBFS

Marlene H. Dortch
Secretary
Federal Communications Commission
445 12th Street, S.W.
Washington, D.C. 20554

Re:     EchoStar Satellite Operating Corporation, File Nos. SAT-STA-20110627-00122, SAT-
        AMD-20110706-_____, Call Sign S2621

Dear Ms. Dortch:

         EchoStar Satellite Operating Corporation hereby submits for the public file a redacted version of
the amendment1 to its existing application for Special Temporary Authority to deorbit the EchoStar 4
satellite from its current orbital location at 76.85º W.L.,2 along with redacted attachments providing
information regarding the planned deorbiting. Unredacted versions are being submitted separately with
a request for confidential treatment pursuant to 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.457 and 0.459.

                                                     Respectfully submitted,


                                                     /s/
                                                     Pantelis Michalopoulos
                                                     Christopher Bjornson
                                                     Counsel for EchoStar Satellite Operating
                                                     Corporation

cc: Karl Kensinger – International Bureau (via e-mail)
        1
            See File No. SAT-AMD-20110706-_____ (filed July 6, 2011).
        2
            See File No. SAT-STA-20110627-00122 (filed June 27, 2011).


REDACTED
FOR PUBLIC INSPECTION

                                   Before the
                      FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
                                     Washington, D.C. 20554

                                                  )
                                                  )
In the Matter of                                  )
                                                 )
ECHOSTAR SATELLITE OPERATING                     )    File No. SAT—AMD—2011___—
CORPORATION                                      )    File No. SAT—STA—20110627—00122
                                                 )    Call Sign S2621
Special Temporary Authority to Deorbit           )
EchoStar 4 from 76.85° W.L.                      )
                                                 )

    AMENDMENT TO APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL TEMPORARY AUTHORITY

       Through this amendment to its existing application for Special Temporary Authority

(“STA”),l and pursuant to Section 25.120(b)(4) of the Commission‘s rules," EchoStar Satellite

Operating Corporation ("EchoStar") respectfully requests STA for 30 days to deorbit the

EchoStar 4 satellite from its current orbital location at 76.85° W.L., where it is operating as a

Mexican—licensed Direct Broadcast Satellite ("DBS"). The satellite will be transferred to a

disposal orbit at least 300 kim above the geostationary orbit. The grant of this application will

not cause harmful interference to any authorized user of the spectrum and is in the public

interest. To the extent necessary, EchoStar also requests a limited waiver of Sections

25.114(d)(14)(ii) and 25.283(c) of the Commussion‘s rules."

       EchoStar respectfully requests action on this request by July 11, 2011. The "full—motion"

antennas — E980005, E070014 and E070275 — that will be required for the deorbiting are also

       ‘ See File No. SAT—STA—20110627—00122. This amendment provides additional
information and clarifies the technical issues provided in the original STA application. All of the
information contained in the original application is included in this amendment as well.

       247 C.F.R. § 25.120(b)(4).
       * Id. §§ 25.114(d)(14)(ii), 25.283(0).


REDACTED
FOR PUBLIC INSPECTION

needed to conduct transfer orbit operations for Quetzsat—1, which is set to be launched on or

about August 12. Grant of the instant request by July 11, 2011 will allow this recommissioning

of the full—motion antennas.

1.      BACKGROUND AND INTRODUCTION

        EchoStar 4 is currently a Mexican—licensed satellite stationed at the 76.85° W.L. orbital

location. The satellite‘s operation at that slot under Mexican authority was made subject to an

exchange of letters between the Commission and the Mexican Administration.* EchoStar 4‘s

stay at the nominal 77° W.L. orbital location is further governed by the license granted to

EchoStar‘s partner, QuetzSat, S. de R.L. de C.V. ("QuetzSat"), to use the nominal 77° W.L.

orbital location, and by agreements among EchoStar, SES Global Latin America, S.A. ("SES"),

and QuetzSat." As the Commission is aware, EchoStar 4, having reached the end of its useful

life, has been retired from commercial service and now must be deorbited. EchoStar has shared

the specifics of its deorbiting plans with Commission staff through previous confidential filings.

During deorbiting, EchoStar 4 will vacate the nominal 77° W.L. orbital location, thereby

triggering the need for this request in accordance with existing ag,reements.6 EchoStar,

moreover, understands that neither the Mexican Administration nor QuetzSat objects to the

satellite‘s deorbit.




       * See EchoStar Satellite LLC Application for Special Temporary Authority to Conduct
Telemetry, Tracking, and Command Operations during the Relocation of EchoStar 4 to the 77°
W.L. Orbital Location, Order and Authorization, 21 FCC Red. 4077, Appendix A (2006) ("77°
W.L. Order‘).
       ° See Satellite Relocation and Use Agreement for the 77° W.L. Orbital Location, (77°
W.L. Agreement), filed in File No. SAT—STA—20080616—00121, Attachment 3 (granted Oct. 31,
2008) ("EchoStar 8 STA Application").
        © 77° W.L. Order, Appendix A at 8.
                                                ba


REDACTED
FOR PUBLIC INSPECTION

L.     GRANT OF THIS APPLICATION IS IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST AND WILL
       NOT CAUSE HARMFUL INTERFERENCE

       The deorbiting of EchoStar 4 will not cause harmful interference to any other satellite

operator, and will serve the public interest, convenience and necessity.7 The satellite‘s

communications payload has already been switched off, with only telemetry, tracking and

control ("TT&C") operations being performed, and the satellite will continue to operate in this

manner until it achieves its disposal orbit. During the deorbit maneuvers, EchoStar will

coordinate its TT&C operations with all potentially affected operating satellite networks.

EchoStar 4 also will not cause harmful interference to other authorized satellites during its

deorbit because EchoStar 4 will operate on an unprotected, non—harmful interference basis. In

the event that the satellite causes harmful interference, EchoStar will cease operations

immediately.

       EchoStar‘s objectives for the deorbiting are to achieve a 350 km minimum perigee above

the geostationary orbit, permanently isolate the oxidizer tank, and dispose of the remaining

hydrazine propellant to maximum extent possible.




       ‘ See, e.g., Newcomb Communs., Inc., 8 FCC Red. 3631, 3633 (1993); Columbia Comms.
Corp., 11 FCC Red. 8639, 8640 (1996); Am. Tel. & Tel. Co., 8 FCC Red. §742 (1993).

                                                 3


REDACTED
FOR PUBLIC INSPECTION




        The public interest will be served by the grant of this application, as it will allow

EchoStar to safely deorbit the satellite and will allow other operational satellites to be better

accommodated in the vicinity of 77° W.L. Removing satellites that have reached the end of their

life from the GSO reduces the risk that those satellites will cause collisions and frees up valuable

orbital locations for new satellites.

III.    LIMITED WAIVER OF THE ORBITAL DEBRIS MITIGATION RULES

        Section 25.283(c) of the Commission‘s rules requires space station licensees to ensure, at

spacecraft end—of—life, "that all stored energy sources on board the satellite are discharged, by

venting excess propellant, discharging batteries, relieving pressure vessels, and other appropriate

measures."* Similarly, Section 25.114(d)(14)(11) requires space station applicants to address in

their applications "whether stored energy will be removed at the spacecraft‘s end of life, by

depleting residual fuel and leaving all fuel line valves open, venting any pressurized system,

leaving all batteries in a permanent discharge state, and removing any remaining source of stored

energy, or through other equivalent procedures specifically disclosed."" The purpose of these



       8 47 C.F.R. § 25.283(c).
       ° Id. §25.114(d)(14)Gi).


REDACTED
FOR PUBLIC INSPECTION

rules, as is evident from Section 25.114(d)(14)(ii), is to "limit the probability of accidental

explosions . . . after completion of mission operations."""

          The EchoStar 4 satellite was launched in 1998, before the Notice ofProposed

Rulemaking that led to the orbital debris mitigation rules was published."‘ Nevertheless, the

satellite is substantially compliant with these rules, with one qualification. At the satellite‘s end

of life, the batteries will be left in a permanent state of discharge and all sources of stored energy,

with the exception of the helium and oxidizer will be removed so that the fuel will be expended

to depletion to the fullest extent possible.. i

i coomhsed Martin, the satellite‘s manufacturer,

strongly recommends against venting this residual oxidize, Mn




m cocsnced Martin has also confirmed
that these risks are a function of a design aspect common to all Lockheed A2100 spacecraft

buses. Instead, Lockheed Martin proposes that this residual oxidizer be securely sealed using

pyrotechnic valves upon the completion of the satellite‘s transfer to its disposal orbit.




          5 14.
          ‘‘ Mitigation of Orbital Debris, Notice ofProposed Rulemaking, 17 FCC Red. 5586
(2002).


REDACTED
FOR PUBLIC INSPECTION

        EchoStar hereby requests a waiver of Sections 25.283(c) and 25.114(d)(14)(ii) to the

extent necessary. The Commission has authority to grant waivers of its rules for "good cause

shown. * In general, good cause exists if grant of a waiver would not undermine the purposes

of the rule and would otherwise serve the public interest."" A waiver of the Commission‘s rules

is appropriate in the circumstances once "considerations of hardship, equity, or more effective

implementation of overall policy" have been taken into account."" The Commission has

previously granted waivers of the venting requirement in recognition of circumstances where

venting would either not be possible or would be problematic.‘* The plan EchoStar and

Lockheed have put forth provides the most efficient means for depleting the remaining fuel and

minimizing the risk of debris generation through structural failure or explosive reaction.

IV.     WAIVER PURSUANT TO SECTION 304 OF THE ACT

        In accordance with Section 304 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47

U.S.C. § 304, EchoStar hereby waives any claim to the use of any particular frequency or of the

electromagnetic spectrum as against the regulatory power of the United States because of the

previous use of the same, whether by license or otherwise.

v.      REQUEST FOR EXPEDITED TREATMENT

        Because EchoStar will only have a limited amount of time to complete the deorbiting due

to ground antenna resource constraints, EchoStar respectfully requests expedited processing for

this request.

        * See 47 C.F.R. § 1.3; WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153 (1969).
        13 See, e.g., WAIT Radio, 418 F.2d at 1157; Intelsat North America LLC, 22 FCC Red.
11989 [ 6 (2007); Dominion Video Satellite, Inc., 14 FCC Red. 8182 «[ 5 (1999).
        " WAIT Radio, 418 F.2d at 1159.
        ‘5 See, e.g., Stamp Grant, SES Americom, Inc., File No. SAT—MOD—20100324—00056,
Condition 8 (granted Jun. 21, 2010); Stamp Grant, EchoStar Satellite Operating Corporation, File
No. SAT—LOA—20071221—00183, Condition 4 (granted Mar. 12, 2008).

                                                 6


REDACTED
FOR PUBLIC INSPECTION

VI._   CONCLUSION

       For the foregoing reasons, EchoStar requests that the Bureau grant STA to deorbit

EchoStar 4 from 76.85° W.L. and to grant the requested waiver.

                                            Respectfully submitted,

                                                       Is/

Pantelis Michalopoulos                       Alison Minea
Christopher R. Bjornson                      Corporate Counsel
L. Lisa Sandoval                             EchoStar Satellite Operating Corporation
Steptoe & Johnson LLP                        1110 Vermont Avenue, NW, Suite 750
1330 Connecticut Avenue, NW                  Washington, D.C. 20005
Washington, D.C. 20036                       (202) 293—0981
(202) 429—3000


July 6, 2011


REDACTED
FOR PUBLIC INSPECTION




                        ATTACHMENT

                         REDACTED




                            8



Document Created: 2011-07-06 17:50:30
Document Modified: 2011-07-06 17:50:30

© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC