Attachment GRANT

GRANT

DECISION submitted by IB,FCC

GRANT

2006-04-28

This document pretains to SAT-STA-20060303-00023 for Special Temporal Authority on a Satellite Space Stations filing.

IBFS_SATSTA2006030300023_499009

                                                          Appemediy oun
                                                               Wten
bu & Ti riat e same racouim
Pichonicr saroty—2ooatscoums                                      a
omm § 72232                        Echo Stor 6 reloutte +o HOAUW L.
                                repow commucmows commson
                     amucamon ror sc annon screawomnar armionmy
                                        roromei. use y
 rruconnrommnoy
Soee seav o e entowten tooteniy ons eabnmins
ApiicatonforSpecl Tnporiy Aubortyto Move Ew 0 114
Eappicam
        Nume: ttoSurSaclteOpeming ProneNimber            am—m—i00
                  Ress
        Dikhime                           SeeSune:       socms—im
        Stact. 901 SohMeitantosioont E—ntae
           Entonet          Sm              co
           us               Hiote           win   —
           band K Matowia



t                                   is            a6y. q16—206008—
                                                                ces
                                                      Brasz,       »

                                                                          £

                                                      pee~—
                                W/roudren, Polrca Branch Chie?t


                                     ATTACHMENT
                 Conditions of Authorization: SAT—$TA—20060303—00023
                                  SAT— $TA—20060425—00049
                                      Call Sign: $2232
                                   Grant Date: April 28, 2006

EchoStar Satellite Operating Corporation‘s (EchoStar) request for special temporary
authority (STA), File No. SAT—STA—20060303—00023, 18 GRANTED. Accordingly,
EchoStaris authorized on a non harmfulinterference basis for a period of 180 days,
commencing on April 28, 2006, (1) to conduct Telemetry, Tracking and Control (TT&C)
operations related to the relocation of the direct broadcast satellite (DBS), EchoStar 6
(Call Sign: $2232) from the 110.35° W.L. orbital location to the 110.4° W.L. orbital
location and (2) to continue TT&C operations atthe 110.4° W.L. orbitallocation
sufficient to maintain the EchoStar 6 satellte as an in—orbit spare with +/ 0.05
Jongitudinal stationkeeping, in accordance with the terms, conditions, and technical
specifications set forth in its application, Federal Communication Commission
(Commission) rules, and this Atachment
    1. During the drif to the 110.4° W.L. orbital location, and while maintaining an orbit
       at the 110.4° W.L. orbital location, EchoStar shall not operate the main
       communications payload on EchoStar 6.
    2.. EchoStar shall coordinate all drift orbit operations with other potentially affected
        in orbit operators
    3.. During the drift to and while operating at the 110.4° W.L. orbital location, no
        harmfulinterference shall be caused by EchoStar 6 to any other lawfully
        operating space station or other radiocommunication system.
    4.. In the event of any harmful interference as a result of EchoStar 6‘s operations
        during the relocation to or while operating at the 110.4° W.L. orbital location,
        EchoStar shall cease operations immediately upon notifcation ofsuch
        interference and shall inform the Commission, in writing, immediately of such an
        event

    5.. EchoStar is required to accept interference from other lawully operating space
        stations or other radiocommunication systems.
    6. Any action taken or expense incurred as a result of operations pursuant to this
        special temporary authority is solely at EchoStar‘s own risk.


‘ This application vas acceptedfor Aiingand placed on public noticeon March 10, 2006. Satlite Space
Applicatons Accepted forFling, Policy BranchInformation, Public Ntice, Report No. SAT—00%47 (rel
March 10, 2006). No comments were filed.


    7..   EchoStar‘s request, File No. SAT— STA—20060425—00049, for a 30—day extension
          ofthe previously granted authority to operate at 11035° W.L. orbital location 18
          GRANTED, to the extent necessary subject to the safwc conditions as those
          attached to SAT—STA—20060303—00022 and is othervise dismissed as moot.
    8.    EchoStar is afforded thirty days from the date of release of this action to decline
          this authorization as conditioned. Failure to respond within this period will
          consttute formal acceptance of the authorization as conditioned.

    9.. This Grant is issued pursuant to Section 0.261 ofthe Commission‘s rules on
        delegated authority, 47 C.F.R. § 0.261, and is effective immediately.




                                                           .4 S@N—STR zeoscso3.mer3

                                                                 $2282. Gampue_ 44| 24|06

                                                                              mbat
                                                                                 o + “‘N"‘f




* On March 28, 200,the SatelteDivisiongranted withconditions EchoSur‘sappleation, File No. SAT—
$TA—20060303—00023 fora period of30 days commencing on March 20, 2006,to (1 relocte its
EchaStar 6 satlitefrom th110.2° W.L. orbital locationto the 110.352‘ orbitl locationand (2)
operit hesatlite at 110.35°WIL. wit; > 0.longitudinal sutionEcping.


l
       Name:    IiiciMfcinopods        Prose Nember:           an—m—son
       Compay:| Sepociktnwnli?         FrsNember:              an—wszm
       Strats   1100Coemstcn tNW       Poatat                  pritnic@sepeccon
                Watinpon               S                       be
                 us                    itc                     aame <rms
                                       noatentin:              tepiGome
   i ysuarpicinn nlacd n ryicanB uil in Goninion, oc cifer e ie menieo e 1 Saminic D f e ud
beatcaion ce enery o)
   5) Refence ie Nunter orSubninioniD
   i Te e smined wi i aepicamen
 (@ 1¥oconpice an atch FCG To19. IiNoinfcuewon orfeceurmptan e 27 CFRSecion 1114
 9 Goemmenal taiy @ NonmmmenialcndonIoene
 9 Otntiemccutin
[® recoaitcase OW — Snee Suime Goouman)
[E ireremes
@ ClingeSai Lcaion             @ Evend Epimicn ue             9 0«

Efeomay Otacam                                 T RepodiEnaidinam be
    noaw


f Dcrpim i conpice dncipic ienet o n ihnplpo i ndl h fom n w in ced
    ze actacied rarrative and tecinicat appendin




9. y ctekin o todenigncrfestatveer applcntna y aterpry t t pplaio is uen g Y   No
10 adidoPedeevistatincades PC bentispariat tSecion 0 of h Ant—e Actof 198
21 0C coton 2tm ofacomiton o pnenio ouio oacomre utvarce Se 4CBR
120020o t mewing offqacrayto tapplaiontunfr tw papcs
10 NemotFeom Sm                             T micotPewSn
baid Matomiz                                Bcvuiv Vie is inGrentComnet
12 Fewe wmy med achnons
  Rucinen1 SmNeane            Rixtnent Aadnenn             Aestemas
      wirricmise snmmbos wabe on ns romn nrousinne mme ww on mraboment
           (Us,cate Ti1tSem 100 ANDOR Revockmiow oAvy station aurtontzxmon
            0S cade Ti Saien 112ix1),ANDOR FOREITUIRE 0S CodeTi 7,Secion stt


ree nomcr reoumen m nnirrxwonk kenverion acr
Te uic epringfor tcolbeion finformaioiscvinat t nerae2 horperrepons ncltig h tne o micving nsrctce.
anctingeising da usepatrig ad minning h rquire das onconpleng on evieving t cilecionoinfunaton. i you
haxean comnent onturie nina o how wcan nprne h cllescn an rndice t hk icame on plene wrte o t
Fednl ConnicatonsComminion AMD—PERIA PperotkReducton Proet 00070Watingon, DC 20L We uillakn ce
your cunnent esaing t Prevwa RedctonAt pets ofi colccionva h mm ou snd tm tioOfec . PLEASE
bo nor sexn courezen rorns tomis anowess
Heneniter—Yo m equie t repant t acllctim finfoemadon ponend y t Fedalgovennenand h povennennay ns
contietor apomor is cllestin nte t ltacorey vald OMconrt nunter o if w ul to rovide you wih h ndce. Tc
cotecion s teanigndan OME comrt nunber o0—007%
in romrcome yomier is reoumen iy mie rurrrork kepvcrios acr or ims, restic caw 10—13,ocronee
1ms sc usc stcmion asn.


                                     Before the
                      FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
                               Washington, D.C. 20554

                                                      )
                                                      ))
In the Mater of
EenoStar Sarecume Orerannc
Comporation                                           )          File No. SAT—STA—2006
                                                      )
For Special Temporary Authority to Relocate           )
EchoStar 6 to 110.4° W.L. as an In—orbit Spare        )
hane


                   APPLICATION For SPECIAL TEMPORARY AUTHORITY
        By this application, EchoStar Satellite Operating Corporation ("EchoStar")respectfully
requests a special temporary authority ("STA®) to move EchoStar 6 to 110.4° W.L., where
EchoStar will store the satelite as an in—orbit spare for 180 days starting on or about April 4,
2006. Today, EchoStar has also applied to move EchoStar 6 from its current position at110.2°
WLL. to 10.35° W.L., where it will operate temporarily while trafic is being transferted to the
new EchoStar 10 satelite. The instant applicationis a request to move the EchoStar 6 satelite
from 110.35° W.L. to 110.4° W.L. oncetraffic transfer is complete, where it will be operated
only on its TT&C frequencis as an in—orbit spare. ‘The proposed move to 110.4° W.L. and the
maintenance ofthe satellite atthat location as an in—orbit spare will not use harmful
interference to any authorized spectrum user. EchoStar will also coordinate alldrit orbit
operations with other potentially affected in—orbit operators.
1.     DISCUssION
       EchoStaris currently operating two satelitesat 110° W.L.. EchoStar 8 is a spot— and
CONUS—beam satelite operating on 20 of EchoStar‘s 29 assigned channels at the 110.0° W.L.


orbital location." EchoStar 6 is a CONUS—beam satelite operating on nine of those frequencies
at the 110.2° W.L. orbiallocation." EchoStar has requested authority to provide DBS service
from the nominal 110° W.L. orbitalposition using the EchoStar 10 satelite,and plans t locate
the stelliteat the 110.2° W.L.orbitalocation. On Febmuary 3, 2006, EchoStar received Special
Temporary Authority to launch EchoStar 10 and to test it at the 138.5° W.L. orbitallocation."
Testing is due to be completed on March 21, 2006.
       OnceEchoStar 10 moves to the 110.2° W.L.orbital location with the Commission‘s
approval, EchoStar plans to transition spot beam operations from EchoStar 8 to EchoStar 10.
This will free up capacity on EchoStar 8 for CONUS operations, and in turn will permit
EchoStar to ransferthe EchoStar 6 traffi to EchoStar 8. EchoStar has separately applied for an
STA to operate EchoStar 6 at 110.35° W.L. during traffic transfer. EchoStar expects that traffic
transfer operations will take no more than 30 days. Upon completion of traffic transfer,
EchoStar 6 will cease operation of ts communications payload. ‘The instant application is for
temporary authority to move the satelite to 110.4° W.L.and to maintain it there as anin—orbit
spare once traffic transfer is complete
       EchoStarrecognizes thatits plan willresultin operating EchoStar 6 outside ofthe 110°
W.LDBS "cluster"allotted to the United States by the Intermational Telecommunication Union


        ‘ EchoStar Satellite Corporation, Applicationfor Minor Modification ofDirect
Broadeast Satelite Authorization, Launch and Operating Authorityfor EchoStar VIlL, Order and
Authorization, 17 FCC Red 11326 (2002).
        ° RchoStar Satelite Corporation, Applicationfor Minor Modification ofFour DBS Space
Station Authorizations To Operate on 11 Channels at 119° WL, To Operate on 10 Channels at
119° WL, To Operate on 28 Channels at 110° WL, To Operate on 1 Channel at 110° WL,
Applicationfor Renewal ofSpecial Temporary Authority to Operate a Direct Rroadcast Satellite
at the 110° WL Orbital Location, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 18 ECC Red 15211 (2003).
       * See Stamp Grant, File No. SAT—STA—20060104—00004 (granted Feb. 3, 2006).


(‘TTU®)" Under the current TTU Region 2 BSS Plan,the United States has the authority to allow
satelite operators to provide Broadeast SatelliteService ("BSS") (Ze., DBS service in the United
States) at orbitl locations within plus/minus 0.2° of the designated orbitallocation, known as
clusters. Under this plan,the United States has sole authority over the BSS frequencies    located
at the 110° W.L. cluster. This eluster consists of orbital locations from 109.8° W.L. to 110.2°
W.L. In order t operate its satelite permanently outside ofthe authorized cluster, an operator
must seck to modify the ITU Region 2 BSS Plan."

       However, EchoStaris not secking to operate permancntly on the DBS frequencies at
110.4° WLL. Ratheritis only secking authoritytorelocate the satellite to 110.4° W.L. for a
period of 180 days, where it will operate as an in—orbit spare with ts communications payload
tumed off utilizing only its TT&C frequencis.
       "The Commission has previously granted temporary authority to operate outside of an
orbital location cluster on the condition that operations do not cause harmfulinterference to
lawfully operating satellitesystems and that the satellte system operate without protection from
lawful systems,® In fact,in very similar circumstances, the Bureau recently approved a similar




         See ITU Regulations, Appendix 30, Annex 7, Section B.
       w
       *ITU Regulations, Appendix 30, Art. 10.
       " ITU Regulations, Appendix 30, Art. 4.2.
       * See Letter from Thomas S. Tyez, Chicf, Satelite and Radio Communications Division,
FCC, to David K. Moskowit, Senior Viee President and General Counsel for EchoStar Satelite
Corporation, at 2, dated Jan. 14, 2000 (granting authority to operate the EchoStar 4 satelite at
119.35° W.L., outside of he 119° W.L. clusten).


request by DIRECTV for relocation ofthe DIRECTV 6 satellite outside ofthe 110° W.L.cluster
(east of the cluster)?
        For the reasons set forth below, the temporary operation of EchoStar 6 at 110.4° W.L.
will not cause harmful nterference to any authorized user ofthe spectrum, and would be in the
public interest. Accordingly, the Commission should grantthe requested temporary authority.
11.    GRANT OR THIS APPLICATION IS IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST
       "The Commission has long—standing policy ofgranting Special Temporary Authority
where such authorization will not cause harmful intrference and will serve the public interest,
convenience and necessity. See eg. Jn the Matter ofNewcomb Communications, Inc., 8 FCC
Red. 3631, 3633 (1993); /n the Marter ofColumbia Communications Corp, 11 FCC Red. $639,
8640 (1996); In the Marter ofAmerican Telephone & Telegraph Co., Order, 8 ECC Red. 8742
(1993). The requested operations meet both ofthese tests.
       Temporary operation ofthe EchoStar 6 at 110.4° W.L. as an in—orbit spare will not cause
harmful interference to any other U.S—licensed satellte operator. Moving EchoStar 6 o this
orbitallocation and limiting operations to TT&C would., if anything, reduce any potentil for
interference with DIRECTV 5 at109.8° W.L.and any BSS satelites further cast. In addition,
the closest operational BSS satelites to the west ofEchoStar 6‘s proposed location (except other
EchoStar satellites) are two DIRECTV satelites located at 119° W.L. Locating the EchoStar 6
satellite with only ts TT&C beams operating a mere 0.2° closer to 119° W.L. will not
appreciably increase the interference experienced by the sateliteslocated atthat orbita location.
This is demonstrated in thetechnical showing in Artachment 4.

       * See, eg. DIRECTV Enterprises, LLC, DA—05—2654, Order and Authorization, File Nos.
SAT—A/O—20050504—00093 and SAT—STA—20050518—00105, at 9 10, 15—16 (rel. Oct.5, 2005
(‘DIRECTV 6 STA®)


       Finally, EchoStar notes again thatthe Intemational Bureau recently granted temporary
authority to DIRECTV for a similar move for the same purpose, subject to certain conditions,
which are acceptable to EchoSta.""
       EchoStar accordingly secks authority to move EchoStar 6 to the 110.4° W.L. orbital

location and to maintain the satelite atthat location as an in—orbit spare, subject to the fllowing
conditions:

       a) During the drif t the 110.4° W.L. orbitallocation, and while maintaining an orbit at
             thatlocation, EchoStar shall not operate the main communications payload on
             EchoStar6.

       ) EchoStar shall coordinate all dift orbit TT&C operations with other potentialy
         affected in—orbit operators.
       ) During relocation ofthe EchoStar 6 satelite, operations shall be on a non—harmiful
             interference basis, meaning that EchoStar shall not cause interference to, and shall not
             claim protection from interference caused to it by any other lawfully operating
             satellites.

       4) In the event that any harmfulinterference is caused as a result of operations during the
          relocation ofthe EchoStar 6 satelite or while the satellit iat110.4° W.L., EchoStar
          shall cease operations immediately upon notification of such interference and shall
          inform the Commission immedistely, in writing, of such event.
       EchoStar requests that the STA begin on or about April 4, 2006 for a period of 180 days.
u.     SECTION 304 WAIVER
       In accordance with Section 304 of the Communications Act of 1934, 47 U.S.C. § 304,

EchoStar hereby waives any claim to the use ofany particular frequency or ofthe
electromagnetic spectrum because of the previous use ofthe same, whether by license or
otherwise.




       ‘" See DIRECTV 6 STA at ¥f 15—16.


1.     concLuston
       For the foregoing reasons, EchoStar respectfully requests special temporary authority to
relocate the satellte to 110.4° W.L.and to maintain it there as an in—orbit spare.
                                              Respectfully submitted,
                                              EchoStar Satellite Operating Corporation

                                                         Is!
Pantelis Michalopoulos                        David K. Moskowitz
Chung Hsiang Mah                              Excentive Vice President and General Counsel
Steptoe & Johnson tir                         EchoStar Satellite Operating Corporation
1330 Comnecticut Avenue N.W.                  9601 South Meridian Boulevard
Washington, D.C. 20036                        Englewood, CO 80112
(202) 429—3000                                (303) 723—1000

Counselfor EchoStar Satellite Operating Corporation
March 3, 2006


                                     ATTACHMENTA

Potential Interference Issues
The EchoStar—6 satelite operates in the frequency bands covered by Appendices 30 and
30A of the Radio Regulations. These bands are 12.2 — 12.7 GHz (space—to—Earth) and
17.3 — 17.8 GHz (Rarth—to—space). Operational co—frequency satelites within 10 degrees
of the 110°W orbital location, aside from EchoStar‘s,are the DIRECTV DBS satellitesat
101°W and 119°W.>*
"The resultofthe requested shif for the EchoStar—6 satelite from 110.2"W to 110.35°W
and then to 110.4°W provides a greater orbitalseparation from the DIRECTV satelitesat
the 101°W location and therefore there is no negative impact to these operations.. With
the proposed shif, the EchoStar—6 satellte will move closer to the US—assigned 1 19W
ofbitallocation where both EchoStar and DIRECTV satellites operate within a + 0.2
degree cluster. Currently, there are two operationalsatellitesat the 1 19W cluster —
EchoStar—7 located at118.9°W and DIRECTV—78 located at 119.2@W. Currently the
ofbitalseparation between the EchoStar—6 satelite and the DIRECTV—78 satellite is
therefore nominally 9 degrees, o 8.9 degrecs taking into account station—keeping
tolerances of both satelites. Withthe requested shift ofEchoStar—6 to 110.35°W and
then 110.4°W the orbitalseparation would be nominally 8.85 to .8 degrees, or 8.75 to
8.7 degrees taking into account the station—keeping tolerances ofboth satelites. Taking
the worst case of EchoStar 6 at 110.4°W, the result ofthe shift in terms ofreceive carth
station offaxis gain is a difference ofless than 0.25 dB and the offaxis discrimination of
the receiving earth station is still greaterthan 29 dB. Similarly the large feeder ink arth
stations used by EchoStar provide suffiient solation atthese orbital separations to
prevent any uplink interference effects. Therefore, he proposed shif of EchoStar—6 from
110.2°W to 110.35 and then to 1 10.4°W willresult in negligible impact to the DIRECTV
operations atthe 119°W location.
In addition to these operational satelites, a search using the TTU‘s on—line databases show
there are several AP30/30A BSS filings at"tweener" orbitl locations, e¢. 105.5°W and
114.5°W. There is no indication, however, that these satelites wl be operational in the
time—frame ofthe requested temporary operation of EchoStar—6 satelie at the 110.35°W
orbital location. At the 110.4 °W orbital location, the EchoStar 6 satelite will be closer
to the 114.5°W orbitallocation. However, the EchoStar6 satelite will not be providing
service from this location so only ts TT&C frequencics will be operating. If in the future
 ! Orhropenitional o—requency DBS sateltes, . the Canadian networkat 91°W arefarher removed
‘Theoffis diseriminationofthreceiv cah siatonsatsepurtionsareterthan10 degreo is 31 B or
aseater(assaming an equivalent 45 em dish anterna that meets TVR B0.1213refeence patem). Thus,
therequeted shiof02 degreesforthe EchoStar—6 stlite would havean even moreatomated impuct
on opervions fDBS sitelitesopenting more thin 10 degrees avay thin what willb seon o e a
nealible effect on the stlitesat 119°W
* This ames coversboth he proposed ransitonal operaon ofEchoStar 6 at 110.35° W L.and the
snbsequent proposed temporaryoperation t 1104° W L or simplicis, we will us the104° WL.
postionin hianalyis.


a satelftis located at the 114.5°W orbitallocation, successful coordination of the TT&C
frequencies should be possible given the narrow bandwidihs and the larger carth station
used by EchoStar for is TT&C operations. There are also many flings for use ofthe
Region 2 17.3 17.8 GHz BSS downlink allocation. These satelites carnot be brought
into use until 1 April 2007. Moreaver, the issue with these networks is 17 GHz feeder
link earth station interference into receiving earth stations, and this would be unaffected
by the precise orbital location ofthe EchoStar 6 satelite. Similarly, there are FSS Ka—
band filigsthat include the 17 GHz spectrum in the space—to—Earthdirection. The TU
databases also includes FSS filings for the 12 GHe band in Regions 1 and 3. Because of
the large geographic separation of the service areas the up to 0.2° shift of EchoStar6
would notimpact these networks cither.
Collsion Avoidance Issues
In considering current and planned satellites that may have a station—keeping volume that
overlapping the EchoStar—6 satelite‘s new proposed locations at 110.35°W and 110.4°W,
we have reviewed the lsts of FCC Hicensed satellte networks, as well as those thatare
currently under consideration by the FCC. In addition, non—USA networks for which a
filing has been submited to the TTin the vicinity of 1 10° W have also been reviewed.
Only those networks that either operate, or are planned to operate, and have an
overlapping station—keeping volume with the EchoStar—6 satellite, have been taken into
account in the analysis. For purposes ofcalculating potential station—keeping volume
overlap, US satelltes have been assumed to have a maximum east—west excursion of
+0,05° from their nominal location, while non—US satelite networks have been assumed
to have a maximum excursion of +0.1° from their nominallocation
Currently there are four operational US liensed satellites within +0.5° of 1 10°W.L.
These are the DIRECTV—6 satellite at 109.5°W, the DIRECTV—5 satellite at109.4°W, the
EchoStar—6 sateliteat 110.2°W and the EchoStar—8 satellteat 110.0°W. Addiionally,
EchoStar has requested authority t provide DBS service from the nominal 110° W.L
orbital position using the EchoStar—10 satelite, and plans to locate the satelliteat the
110.2° W.L. orbital location. Taking into account the maximum east—west excursion of
+0.05®,none of these satelites have the potential to overlap with the station—keeping
volume of the EchoStar—6 satellteatthe 110.35°W or 110.4°W orbital locations.
in addition to these operationalstelltesa review ofthe ITU on—line databases include
the following non—USA flings at the 110°W orbital location: EMARSAT—5B/M from
the United Arab Emirates, INMARSAT—S7 from the United Kingdom and PAS—
ENDEAVOUR—1IOW from Australi. A review of the FAA Quarterly Launch Report
does not indicate that these satelites willbe launched in the near future. In adition to
theseflings there are US filings for Region 2 17 GHz BSS operations. The carliest these
networks can be brought into use is 1 April 2007, however.. t is noted that, with the
assumed station—keeping maximum excursions stated above, there would be no
overlapping station—keeping volume with the EchoStar 6 satelite at 110.35°W and
110.4°W orbital locations.


             CERTIFICATION OF PERSON RESPONSIBLE
          FOR PREPARING ENGINEERING INFORMATION

       I hereby declare under penalty ofperjury that1 am the technically qualified
person responsible for preparation of the enginecring information contained in the
foregoing submission, thatI am familiar with Part 25 of the Commission‘s rules, that
have either prepared or reviewed the engineering information submitted in this pleading,
and that iis true and correct o the best of my knowledge and beliet



                                                                      /sl
                                                    RRichard J. Bamen, PhD, BS
                                                    Telecomm Stategies, Ic.
                                                    6404 Highland Drive
                                                    Chevy Chase, Maryland 20815
                                                    (301) 656—8969

Dated: March 3, 2006



Document Created: 2006-05-01 16:26:18
Document Modified: 2006-05-01 16:26:18

© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC