Attachment STA

This document pretains to SAT-STA-20011025-00091 for Special Temporal Authority on a Satellite Space Stations filing.

IBFS_SATSTA2001102500091_236233

                                                                     Privileged and Confidential




                                        October 25, 2001



BY HAND DELIVERY

Magalie Roman Salas
Secretary
Federal Communications Commission
International Bureau - Satellites
P.O. Box 358210
Pittsburgh, PA 15251-5210

               Re:    Application for Special Temporary Authority to Operate a
                      Direct Broadcast Satellite Over the Even-Numbered Channels
                      at the 148° W.L. Orbital Location, File No. _________________

                       EXPEDITED CONSIDERATION REQUESTED

Dear Ms. Salas:

               Pursuant to Section 309(f) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47
U.S.C. § 309(f), EchoStar Satellite Corporation (“EchoStar”) hereby requests Special Temporary
Authority (“STA”) to move its EchoStar 2 satellite from the 119° W.L. orbital location to the
148° W.L. orbital location and operate it over the 16 even-numbered channels at 148° W.L. (8 of
which are already licensed to EchoStar) for a period of 180 days. Enclosed is an FCC Form 159
and a check in the amount of $135.00 to cover applicable filing fees. Also enclosed is an
additional copy, which we ask that you date stamp and return with our messenger.

                EchoStar 2 is now operating as an in-orbit spare satellite at the 119° W.L. orbital
location. EchoStar has deployed other satellites (currently, EchoStar 4 and 6) that use all of the
21 DBS channels licensed to EchoStar at that location. The exigencies of the must-carry
requirements, which commence on January 1, 2002, will create an unprecedented strain on
EchoStar’s satellite and spectrum resources. As the Commission is aware, EchoStar must carry
all qualified broadcast stations in each and every market where EchoStar now offers local
network stations and in every new market that EchoStar may want to start serving. These rules
necessitate EchoStar activating as much satellite capacity as possible. Specifically, EchoStar can
no longer afford to maintain an in-orbit spare at 119° W.L., and under separate cover, concurrent
with this filing, has requested authority to move the EchoStar 2 satellite to the 148° W.L. orbital
location (“Modification Application”).


Ms. Magalie Roman Salas
October 25, 2001
Page 2


               EchoStar has operating authority for 24 DBS channels (all 16 odd-numbered
channels and even-numbered channels 2 through 16) at 148° W.L. EchoStar already operates the
16 odd-numbered channels with its EchoStar 1 satellite, which moved to 148° W.L. in the year
2000. The Modification Application requests authority for EchoStar 2 to operate over the even-
numbered channels 2 through 16. By the instant request, in order to expedite use of the
frequencies, EchoStar requests special temporary authority for these same channels as well as
even-numbered channels 18 through 32, which are not licensed to any entity.

               The proposed relocation of EchoStar 2 is part of a broader effort on EchoStar’s
part to comply with the must-carry rules. That effort includes the launch of EchoStar 7 and 8,
two new spot beam satellites. Circumstances beyond EchoStar’s control, however, could delay
the launch of EchoStar 7. Out of an abundance of caution, EchoStar seeks to realign its fleet to
ensure compliance with the must carry rules.

                The STA request is in the public interest, since it will move EchoStar 2 from in-
orbit spare status to fully operational status. It also will not cause harmful interference into any
authorized user of the spectrum. In fact, there is no other company that operates a DBS satellite
or is even licensed for such operation at or near the 148° W.L. orbital location. In any event,
EchoStar is ready to terminate its temporary operations immediately upon notification of harmful
interference by a licensed user of the spectrum.

               To be operational on January 1, 2002 while maintaining a sufficient supply of
fuel, EchoStar 2 must commence its move immediately. EchoStar therefore respectfully requests
Commission action at the earliest possible date, but no later than Friday, November 16, 2001.

                                    I.      BACKGROUND

                EchoStar has operated EchoStar 2 at 119° W.L. under a license granted on
November 25, 1996. See Letter from Donald H. Gips, Bureau Chief, Federal Communications
Commission, to DirectSat Corporation, DA 96-1982 (Nov. 26, 1996) (granting license for
EchoStar 2 and enclosing terms of license); File No. SAT-MOD-19990419-00043. EchoStar 2
initially operated over 10 DBS channels (even-numbered channels 2-20) at that orbital location.
It was eventually relegated to in-orbit spare status after the move of EchoStar 4 to 119° W.L. and
the launch of EchoStar 6 to that slot. See Letter to David K. Moskowitz, Senior Vice President
and General Counsel of EchoStar Satellite Corporation from Chief, FCC Satellite and
Radiocommunication Division (Aug. 10, 2000); see also EchoStar Satellite Corporation
Application for Authority to Make Minor Modifications to Direct Broadcast Satellite
Authorizations, Launch and Operation Authority; Request for Waiver of Section 100.21 of the
Commission’s Rules, 15 FCC Rcd. 23636 (2000).

               In January 1996, EchoStar was the winning bidder in a Commission auction for
24 channels at 148º W.L. See EchoStar DBS Corporation Wins 24 DBS Channels at the 148
Degree Orbital Location with a High Bid of $52,295,000, FCC Press Release (Jan. 26, 1996). In


Ms. Magalie Roman Salas
October 25, 2001
Page 3


December 1996, the Commission authorized EchoStar to construct, launch and operate its DBS
system at 148º W.L. See In Re Application of EchoStar DBS Corporation, 12 FCC Rcd. 11946
(1996); In Re Application of EchoStar DBS Corporation, 11 FCC Rcd. 16291 (1996). EchoStar
moved its 16-transponder EchoStar 1 satellite to 148° W.L. in 2000, and currently operates the
16 even-numbered channels at that orbital location authorized to EchoStar at 148º W.L. using
EchoStar 1.

                  II.    THE PROPOSAL IS IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST

                 This STA request is in the public interest. EchoStar 2 is not needed at 119° W.L.
except as an in-orbit spare, and is not operational at that location. This proposal will move it
from its now “dormant” status to full operational status for all of its 16 transponders. The instant
request will therefore result in the use of 16 currently unused DBS channels at a western orbital
location, to the benefit of U.S. consumers. In addition, the move is essential to EchoStar’s
efforts to provide local broadcast service to as many cities as feasible. Under the must-carry
scheme, the decision of a satellite carrier to provide even one popular local station in a particular
city carries with it a manifold burden on the spectrum available to the carrier – the obligation to
carry all qualified stations in that market. See 47 C.F.R. 76.66. This poses a daunting strain on
EchoStar’s satellite capacity. To meet this need for capacity, EchoStar plans to launch two new
satellites, EchoStar 7 and 8, at a cost of roughly a half billion dollars. While the earliest
EchoStar 7 will launch is late December of this year, certain factors beyond EchoStar’s control
could contribute to the delay of this launch, including delays in delivery of the satellite or
difficulties in procuring adequate launch insurance. The STA EchoStar seeks here will help it
meet its must carry obligation, especially in light of the risk that EchoStar 7’s launch may be
delayed. Specifically, EchoStar seeks to use the frequencies at 148° W.L. to support DBS
services and backhaul capacity allowing the transfer of programming streams between
EchoStar’s Gilbert, AZ and Cheyenne, WY uplink facilities.1 The unappealing alternative would
be to drop local service in markets where EchoStar currently carries local television stations,
something EchoStar hopes to avoid.

                This STA request, in addition to encompassing the frequencies won by EchoStar
at auction, extends to 8 channels for which EchoStar does not have a firm license. The only
alternative to use of these channels under an STA is to leave those frequencies fallow. Thus,
granting the STA would further the public interest. In fact, the Commission has resolved this
question dispositively by granting EchoStar an STA to operate at 61.5° W.L. over channels
licensed to another company as well as over unlicensed channels. See Direct Broadcasting
       1
         Backhaul operation is explicitly included in EchoStar’s DBS authorizations under the
Commission’s policy of flexibility in allowing “non-conforming uses” of DBS resources. See In
the Matter of Revision of Rules and Policies for the Direct Broadcast Satellite Service, 11 FCC
Rcd. 9712, 9717-18 (1995).


Ms. Magalie Roman Salas
October 25, 2001
Page 4


Satellite Corp., DA 98-544 (rel. Mar. 21, 1998). As in that case, shutting down the temporary
operations at issue here can be immediate. See id. at ¶ 8. Moreover, unlike in that case, the
channels in question here are not licensed to any one else, and are not likely to be used by any
one for several years, making the case for an STA here all the stronger.2

           III.   THE PROPOSED OPERATION WILL NOT CAUSE HARMFUL
                                  INTERFERENCE

                No entity other than EchoStar has authority to conduct DBS operations from the
148° W.L. slot. Therefore, the requested operational authority will not cause any harmful
interference to any authorized user of the spectrum. See, e.g., In the Matter of Newcomb
Communications, Inc., 8 FCC Rcd. 3631, 3633 (1993); In the Matter of Columbia
Communications Corporation, 11 FCC Rcd. 8639, 8640 (1996).

               EchoStar 2 and EchoStar 1 are technically identical DBS satellites, and the
Commission has already found that EchoStar 1 will not cause harmful interference from the 148°
W.L. orbital location. The attached Technical Annex provides additional evidence in that regard.

                As for EchoStar 2’s TT&C operations in the extended C-band, the move would, if
anything, alleviate any risk of interference, since it would place the satellite in a less congested
part of the geostationary arc. In any event, EchoStar 2 uses only a narrow sliver of that spectrum
for its TT&C communications, and coordination should be straightforward. EchoStar commits
to discontinuing any offending operations upon notification of harmful interference by an
authorized user of the spectrum.

                                IV.     SECTION 304 WAIVER

              In accordance with Section 304 of the Communications Act of 1934, 47 U.S.C. §
304, EchoStar hereby waives any claim to the use of any particular frequency or of the
electromagnetic spectrum because of the previous use of the same, whether by license or
otherwise.
                                   V.      CONCLUSION

               For the foregoing reasons, EchoStar respectfully requests Special Temporary
Authority to move its EchoStar 2 satellite to the 148° W.L. orbital location and operate it at 148°
W.L. for a period of 180 days.

       2
          Indeed, the practical experience from the STA given to EchoStar at 61.5° in 1998
provides additional reassurance for the Commission. Even though that STA has partially expired
for the channels licensed to Dominion, that expiration has caused no service disruption or
customer confusion whatsoever.


Ms. Magalie Roman Salas
October 25, 2001
Page 5




                          Respectfully submitted,



                          ______________________________
                          David K. Moskowitz
                          Senior Vice President and General Counsel
                          EchoStar Satellite Corporation
                          5701 South Santa Fe
                          Littleton, CO 80123
                          (303) 723-1000


cc:   Thomas S. Tycz
      Rosalee Chiara
      Jennifer Gilsenan
      Paul Locke
      Chris Murphy
      Rockie Patterson



Document Created: 2001-11-16 11:55:11
Document Modified: 2001-11-16 11:55:11

© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC