Attachment Narrative

This document pretains to SAT-PPL-20160304-00024 for Permitted List on a Satellite Space Stations filing.

IBFS_SATPPL2016030400024_1129152

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, DC 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Empresa Argentina de Soluciones ) Satelitales S.A. Petition for Declaratory Ruling ) File No. To Add ARSAT-2 to the ) Call Sign Permitted Space Station List ) ) ) PETITION FOR DECLARATORY RULING Empresa Argentina de Soluciones Satelitales S.A. (“ARSAT”), an Argentine corporation, respectfully files this Petition for a Declaratory Ruling pursuant to Section 25.137(c) of the Federal Communications Commission (“Commission”) Rules to add the ARSAT-2 satellite at 81ºW to the Permitted Space Station List (“Permitted List”).1 ARSAT-2 will serve the United States in the C- and Ku- band. The Commission allows non-U.S.-licensed satellites to be included on the Permitted List upon demonstrating compliance with Sections 25.114 and 25.137 of the Commission’s Rules, assuming there are no other public interest concerns. This Petition and its associated attachments, including FCC Form 312 and Schedule S, provide the information required for the 1 ARSAT-2 will be permanently located 81º W. However, the satellite is temporarily positioned at 81.1º W because satellite AMC-2 is currently located at 80.85º W. In order to ensure safe stationkeeping volume, ARSAT-2 will be maintained at 81.1º W until AMC-2 is repositioned in June 2016. ARSAT has coordinated stationkeeping and power levels with SES to ensure there is no possibility of collision or harmful interference during this period.

Commission to determine that the ARSAT-2 satellite meets the requirements of Sections 25.114 and 25.137 and is thus eligible to be on the Permitted List. I. REQUIREMENT OF SECTION 25.114 AND 25.137 OF THE COMMISSION’S RULES ARSAT-2 is licensed by Argentina and will be located at the 81º W orbital location. The 81º W orbital location is assigned to Argentina. Therefore, the Commission cannot license U.S. satellites in these frequency bands at this orbital location. Argentina is a member country of the WTO. In addition, Argentina and the United States have reached a bilateral agreement that allows Argentine satellites to offer FSS service in the United States, after those satellites have been coordinated with the United States.2 ARSAT is requesting to provide Fixed-Satellite Services (“FSS”) covered by the WTO Telecom Agreement and “other FSS services” covered by the US-Argentina Bilateral Agreement. Given Argentina’s membership in the WTO and the existing Bilateral Agreement with the United States, Argentina is not required to make the effective competitive opportunities showing 3 pursuant to Section 25.137 of the Commission’s Rules. The relevant International 2 Protocol Concerning the Transmission and Reception of Signals From Satellites for the Provision of Direct-to-Home Satellite Services and Fixed-Satellite Services in the United States of American and the Argentine Republic (June 5, 1998) (available at http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/112469.pdf) (“US-Argentina Bilateral Agreement”). 3 See 47 C.F.R. § 25.137(a)(2); see also Amendment of the Commission’s Regulatory Policies to Allow Non-U.S. Licensed satellites Providing Domestic and International Service in the United States, Report and Order, IB Docket No. 96-111, 12 FCC Rcd 24094, ¶ 39 (1997) (“We adopt our proposal to apply a presumption in favor of entry in considering applications to access non- U.S. satellites licensed by WTO members to provide services covered by the U.S. commitments under the WTO Basic Telecom Agreement.”); Id., ¶ 64 (“[W]e will not evaluate the effective competitive opportunities in the route market for non-U.S. satellites licensed by a WTO Member providing WTO covered services. Thus, we will not perform an ECO-Sat test on any route, whether a WTO route market or a non-WTO route market.”). 2

Telecommunications Union (“ITU”) network for the ARSAT-2 satellite has been notified under Article 11 of the ITU Radio Regulations and is recorded in the ITU Master Register. ARSAT-2 is already on orbit and operating, and is the second geostationary satellite launched and operated by ARSAT. Therefore, it is not necessary for ARSAT to provide financial information for the Commission to determine that ARSAT is financially capable of building, launching, and operating its satellite.4 II. REQUEST FOR WAIVER OF SECTION 25.210(A)(3) OF THE COMMISSION’S RULES ARSAT requests a waiver of Section 25.210(a)(3) of the Commission’s Rules, which requires that the C-band payload on the space station providing service to the U.S. be capable of switching polarity upon ground command. The ARSAT-2 C-band transmission polarization sense is not switchable from the ground. The Commission has previously waived this rule in several cases for good cause for other non-U.S. licensed FSS operators requesting to add space stations to the Permitted Space Station List. Section 1.3 of the Commission’s Rules provides that the Commission may waive any of its rules if the petitioner shows “good cause,” for example, circumstances in which waiver would better serve the public interest than would application of the rule. 5 In this case, the Commission’s satellite policies are well served by the omission of payload polarization 4 Amendment of the Commission’s Regulatory Policies To Allow Non-U.S.-Licensed Space Stations To Provide Domestic and International Satellite Service in the United States, Report and Order, IB Docket No. 96-111, 12 FCC Rcd 24094, ¶ 191 (1997) (“DISCO II Order”) (explaining that the presence of in-orbit satellites satisfies concerns about an operator’s capabilities of building and operating a satellite). 5 47 C.F.R. § 1.3; WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153 (D.C. Cir. 1969); appeal after remand, 459 F.2d 1203 (D.C. Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1027 (1972); Northeast Cellular Tel. Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164 (D.C. Cir. 1990). 3

switching capabilities. First, this design decision reduces the technical risk by avoiding a single point of failure in each transponder’s polarization. It also reduces the mass and cost of the satellite, as well as reducing input and output losses resulting in better performance. Furthermore, such capability is unnecessary because ARSAT-2 has completed coordination with operators of adjacent satellites and will operate in accordance with those agreements, which take into account the fixed polarization of its C-band transmissions. The Commission has granted this same waiver to several other non-U.S. satellite operators who have applied to be on the Permitted Space Station List under similar circumstances.6 In these Orders, the Commission concluded that waiving Section 25.210(a)(3) will not undercut the policies underlying the Commission’s adoption of the rule and the Commission placed appropriate conditions on the waiver.7 Consistent with relevant precedent, granting this waiver under Section 1.3 of the Commission’s Rules is appropriate and would serve the public interest. III. ADDING ARSAT-2 TO THE PERMITTED SPACE STATION LIST IS IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST The Commission has found on several previous occasions that adding Central and South American satellites to the Permitted Space Station List was in the public interest.8 For these 6 See Telesat Canada, Petition for Declaratory Ruling, Order, DA 00-2835, 15 FCC Rcd 24828, ¶¶ 16-17 (2000) (“Telesat Canada Order”); see also SAT-PPL-20060329-00030 and SAT- AMD-20060724-00080 (2006). 7 Telesat Canada Order, ¶ 17. 8 See, e.g., Satélites Mexicanos, S.A. de C.V. Petition for Rulemaking, Order, DA 00-1793, 15 FCC Rcd 19311 (2000) (adding Solidaridad 2 and Satmex 5 to the Permitted Space Station List at 113˚W and 116.8˚W, respectively); SAT-PPL-20060329-00030 and SAT-AMD-20060724- 00080 (2006) (adding Satmex 6 to the Permitted Space Station List at 113º W); SAT-PDR- 19991214-00131 and SAT-MOD-20060821-00090 (2006) (modifying orbital location of Solidaridad 2 to 114.9ºW on the Permitted Space Station List). 4

same reasons the public interest will be served by also adding the ARSAT-2 satellite to the Permitted Space Station List. Allowing the ARSAT-2 satellite to offer FSS will enhance competition in the United States. Thus, inclusion of ARSAT-2 on the Permitted Space Station List is in the public interest. IV. CONCLUSION For the reasons stated herein, ARSAT respectfully requests that the Commission add the ARSAT-2 satellite to the Permitted Space Station List. Respectfully submitted, EMPRESA ARGENTINA DE SOLUCIONES SATELITALES S.A. By: Bruce A. Olcott Preston N. Thomas Jones Day 51 Louisiana Ave. NW Washington, D.C. 20001 (202) 879-3630 Its Attorneys March 4, 2016 5

Attachment A Regulatory Compliance Index FCC Rule Rule Summary (This column will be deleted Application/Exhibit Section No. prior to filing) 25.114(c)(4)(i) For each transmitting and receiving antenna Schedule S beam, provide center frequencies, bandwidth, and polarization. 25.114(c)(4)(vi) Map of the proposed coverage area and Gain Attachment B § 5 or (vii) contours (numbers and maps) 25.114(c)(8) Calculated maximum power flux density levels Attachment B - Annex 1 § 2 (supplemental within each coverage area and energy dispersal information to Schedule S) bandwidths, if any, needed for compliance with §25.208, for the angles of arrival specified in the applicable paragraph(s) of §25.208; 25.114(d)(1) Overall description of system facilities, Narrative Statement; Attachment B, § 2 operations and services and explanation of how uplink frequency bands would be connected to downlink frequency bands 25.224(d)(6) Public interest considerations in support of Narrative Statement at III. grant 25.114(d)(7) (Refers to §25.140(a)) Provide interference Attachment B - Annex 1§ 1 analysis showing compatibility with satellites within 2 degrees. 25.114(d)(14)(i- Orbital Debris Mitigation plan Attachment B – Annex 2 iv) 25.137(a)(1) Demonstrate that that U.S.-licensed satellite Narrative at I systems have effective competitive opportunities to provide analogous services in Argentina 25.137(b) Provide legal and technical information Form 312; Narrative Statement; consistent with §25.114 Attachment B 25.202(e) Demonstrate frequency tolerance of 0.002 or Attachment B, § 7 better 25.202(f)(1-3) Out of band emissions limits Attachment B, § 7 25.208 Power Flux Density limits Attachment B, Annex 1, § 2.0 25.210(a)(3) Polarization requirements Narrative Statement at II (Waiver Requested) 25.283 End of life disposal Attachment B - Annex 2 6

ATTACHMENT B Technical Information to Supplement Schedule S 1 SCOPE This Attachment contains additional information required by §25.114(c) and other sections of the FCC §25 rules that cannot be entered into the Schedule S submission. 2 GENERAL DESCRIPTION (§25.114(d)(1)) The ARSAT-2 satellite will operate at 81° W orbital location (with a temporary location of 81.1° W until June 2016). The ARSAT-2 will provide FSS services to the United States using the conventional C- and Ku-band frequencies. The satellite employs 6 C-band transponders and 10 Ku-band transponders using both linear polarizations thereby providing dual frequency re-use. The satellite has one C-band beam which provides coverage of most of the Americas, and two Ku-band beams: a North American beam and a South America beam. There is inter-connectivity between the two Ku beams. 7

3 FREQUENCY PLAN Figures 3-1 and 3-2 show the C-band and Ku-band frequency plans, respectively. Figure 3-1. C-Band Frequency Plan UPLINK DOWNLINK LO BW Channel Coverage MIN. CENTER MAX. POL. Coverage MIN. CENTER MAX. POL. [MHz] [MHz] [MHz] [V / H] [MHz] [MHz] [MHz] [V / H] [MHz] [MHz] BC1 HEMI - - - - HEMI - 3700.25 - V - - BC2 HEMI - - - - HEMI - 3701.25 - H - - 3 HEMI 6010.00 6046.00 6082.00 V HEMI 3785.00 3821.00 3857.00 H 2225 72 4 HEMI 6010.00 6046.00 6082.00 H HEMI 3785.00 3821.00 3857.00 V 2225 72 7 HEMI 6170.00 6206.00 6242.00 V HEMI 3945.00 3981.00 4017.00 H 2225 72 8 HEMI 6170.00 6206.00 6242.00 H HEMI 3945.00 3981.00 4017.00 V 2225 72 11 HEMI 6332.00 6376.00 6420.00 V HEMI 4107.00 4151.00 4195.00 H 2225 88 12 HEMI 6332.00 6376.00 6420.00 H HEMI 4107.00 4151.00 4195.00 V 2225 88 Figure 3-2. Ku-Band Frequency Plan UPLINK DOWNLINK LO BW Channel Coverage MIN. CENTER MAX. POL. Coverage MIN. CENTER MAX. POL. [MHz] [MHz] [MHz] [V / H] [MHz] [MHz] [MHz] [V / H] [MHz] [MHz] 17 SA 13840.000 13858.000 13876.000 V SA 11541.000 11559.000 11577.000 H 2299.00 36.000 18 SA 13840.000 13858.000 13876.000 H SA 11541.000 11559.000 11577.000 V 2299.00 36.000 19 SA 13880.000 13898.000 13916.000 V SA 11581.000 11599.000 11617.000 H 2299.00 36.000 20 SA 13880.000 13898.000 13916.000 H SA 11581.000 11599.000 11617.000 V 2299.00 36.000 21 SA 13920.000 13938.000 13956.000 V SA 11621.000 11639.000 11657.000 H 2299.00 36.000 22 SA 13920.000 13938.000 13956.000 H SA 11621.000 11639.000 11657.000 V 2299.00 36.000 23 SA 13960.000 13978.000 13996.000 V SA 11661.000 11679.000 11697.000 H 2299.00 36.000 24 SA 13960.000 13978.000 13996.000 H SA 11661.000 11679.000 11697.000 V 2299.00 36.000 TM 1 SA & NA - - - - SA & NA 11701.625 11701.750 11701.875 V - 0.250 TC 1 SA 14001.350 14001.750 14002.150 H SA - - - - - 0.800 1 SA 14014.000 14050.000 14086.000 V SA 11715.000 11751.000 11787.000 H 2299.00 72.000 2 SA 14014.000 14050.000 14086.000 H SA 11715.000 11751.000 11787.000 V 2299.00 72.000 3 SA or NA 14094.000 14130.000 14166.000 V SA or NA 11795.000 11831.000 11867.000 H 2299.00 72.000 4 SA or NA 14094.000 14130.000 14166.000 H SA or NA 11795.000 11831.000 11867.000 V 2299.00 72.000 5 SA or NA 14174.000 14210.000 14246.000 V SA or NA 11875.000 11911.000 11947.000 H 2299.00 72.000 6 SA or NA 14174.000 14210.000 14246.000 H SA or NA 11875.000 11911.000 11947.000 V 2299.00 72.000 7 SA or NA 14254.000 14290.000 14326.000 V SA or NA 11955.000 11991.000 12027.000 H 2299.00 72.000 8 SA or NA 14254.000 14290.000 14326.000 H SA or NA 11955.000 11991.000 12027.000 V 2299.00 72.000 9 SA or NA 14334.000 14370.000 14406.000 V SA or NA 12035.000 12071.000 12107.000 H 2299.00 72.000 10 SA or NA 14334.000 14370.000 14406.000 H SA or NA 12035.000 12071.000 12107.000 V 2299.00 72.000 11 NA 14414.000 14450.000 14486.000 V NA 12115.000 12151.000 12187.000 H 2299.00 72.000 12 NA 14414.000 14450.000 14486.000 H NA 12115.000 12151.000 12187.000 V 2299.00 72.000 TC 2 SA 14499.200 14499.600 14500.000 V SA - - - - - 0.800 TM 2 SA & NA - - - - SA & NA 12198.125 12198.250 12198.375 H - 0.250 4 PREDICTED SPACE STATION ANTENNA GAIN CONTOURS (§25.114(d)(3)) The ARSAT-2 antenna gain contours for the receive and transmit beams, as required by §25.114(d)(3), are given in GXT format and embedded in the associated Schedule S submission. 8

5 MAP OF COVERAGE AREA SA1 HEMIUH SA1 HEMIUV SA2 NAMUH 9

SA2 NAMUV 10

SA3 HEMIDH SA3 HEMIDV SA4 NAMDH 11

SA4 NAMDV 12

6 SERVICES TO BE PROVIDED (§25.114(d)(4)) The ARSAT-2 satellite will provide digital FSS services. Representative link budgets, which include details of the transmission characteristics, performance objectives and earth station characteristics, are provided in the associated Schedule S submission. 7 TT&C CHARACTERISTICS (§25.114(c)(4)(i) & §25.114(c)(9)) The ARSAT-2 TT&C sub-system provides for communications during pre-launch, transfer orbit and on-station operations, as well as during spacecraft emergencies. Ku-band telecommand transmissions are received by the spacecraft through a near omni-directional antenna during both transfer orbit and emergency operations. When on-station, TC is conducted via the Ku-band South America beam while TM is conducted via a global horn. TT&C operations will be conducted from Argentine territory. ARSAT does not seek Commission authorization for TT&C transmissions. Contact details for the control stations are provided below: Nominal station Av. Juan Domingo Peron 7934 Benavidez, Buenos Aires Argentina B1621BGZ +54 11 58112600 Backup station Ruta Provincial E96 Km10 Departamento de Punilla, Bosque Alegre Coordinates: -31.606319, -64.568644 Cordoba, Argentina 5187 +54 11 58112600 13

8 SATELLITE TRANSPONDER FREQUENCY RESPONSES (§25.114(c)(4)(vii)) The transponder frequency responses specified over the various channel bandwidths are shown in Tables 7-1 through 7-3. In addition, the frequency tolerances of §25.202(e) and the out-of- band emission limits of §25.202(f)(1), (2) and (3) will be met. Table 7-1. 72 MHz C-Band Transponder Frequency Response Maximum Amplitude Variation relative to maximum Frequency Offset from gain (dBpp) Comments channel center Receive Transmit CF +/‐ 20 MHz 0.3 0.39 CF +/‐ 28 MHz 0.3 0.51 In Band CF +/‐ 32 MHz 0.5 0.57 CF +/‐ 36 MHz 0.7 0.63 Frequency Offset from IMUX Rejection (dB) OMUX Rejection (dB) Comments channel center Receive Transmit CF +/‐ 44 MHz 19.1 19.6 CF +/‐ 45 MHz 25.0 21.1 Out of Band CF +/‐ 80 MHz 49.4 33.3 Table 7-2. 88 MHz C-Band Transponder Frequency Response Maximum Amplitude Variation relative to maximum Frequency Offset from gain (dBpp) Comments channel center Receive Transmit CF +/‐ 24.4 MHz 0.3 0.42 CF +/‐ 34.2 MHz 0.3 0.55 In Band CF +/‐ 39.1 MHz 0.4 0.62 CF +/‐ 44 MHz 0.7 0.69 Frequency Offset from IMUX Rejection (dB) OMUX Rejection (dB) Comments channel center Receive Transmit CF +/‐ 54 MHz 22.7 20.0 CF +/‐ 55 MHz 30.7 23.1 Out of Band CF +/‐ 90 MHz 51.1 33.1 14

Table 7-3. 72 MHz Ku-Band Transponder Frequency Response Maximum Amplitude Variation relative to maximum Frequency Offset from gain (dBpp) Comments channel center Receive Transmit CF +/‐ 24 MHz 0.4 0.45 CF +/‐ 28 MHz 0.5 0.48 In Band CF +/‐ 32 MHz 0.9 0.51 CF +/‐ 36 MHz 1.3 0.64 Frequency Offset from IMUX Rejection (dB) OMUX Rejection (dB) Comments channel center Receive Transmit CF +/‐ 44 MHz 21.4 22.6 CF +/‐ 45 MHz 27.4 19.5 Out of Band CF +/‐ 80 MHz 51.4 28.7 9 INTERFERENCE AND PFD ANALYSES (§25.140(b)(2) & (§25.114(c)(8)) The interference and PFD analyses are contained in Annex 1 to this Attachment. 10 ORBITAL DEBRIS MITIGATION PLAN (§ 25.114(d)(5)) The Orbital Debris Mitigation Plan is contained in Annex 2 to this Attachment. 11 ESTIMATED OPERATIONAL LIFETIME AND RELIABILITY The satellite is designed for a lifetime of 15 years. The probability of the entire satellite successfully operating to that date is estimated at 0.7 based upon a bus reliability of better than 0.78 and a payload reliability better than 0.9. These numbers are based on a detailed reliability analysis performed by the spacecraft manufacturer of all critical components in the satellite bus and payload. 15

11 ITU FILING The ARSAT-2 has been notified and recorded in the ITU’s Master Register as P-P-SAT-1.9 9 ITU SNL Part B Query Result for P-P-SAT-1 (available at http://www.itu.int/net/ITU- R/space/snl/bresult/radvance.asp?sel_satname=P-P-SAT-1). 16

ANNEX 1 INTERFERENCE AND PFD ANALYSES 1.0 Interference Analyses (§§ 25.114(d)(7), 25.140(a)) There are 3 C-/Ku-band operational satellites within two degrees away from the 81° W orbital location to be occupied by ARSAT-2. As previously mentioned, AMC-2 currently operates at the 80.85° W, but will be relocated in June 2016. Table 1-1 below summarizes the nearby satellites. The purpose of this section is to demonstrate compatibility between the operations of networks within two degrees. Table 1. Satellites within Two Degrees of ARSAT-2 Loc. Status Name Operator 24 Ku-band transponders 83 W active AMC 9 SES S.A. 32 Ku-band transponders 82 W active Nimiq 4 Telesat Canada Ltd. 24 Ku-band and 24 C-band transponders. 80.85 26 Ku-band (2 beams) and 10 C-band (hemi active AMC 2 (GE 2) SES S.A. W beam) equivalent transponders 81.1 active ARSAT 2 ARSAT W 81 W planned ARSAT 3 ARSAT 24 active Ku-band transponders 79 W active Sky-Mexico 1 DirecTV, Inc. 24 Ku-band transponders Tables 2 through 3 provide a summary of the C-band and Ku-band transmission parameters, respectively, derived from the ARSAT-2 link budgets that are embedded in the Schedule S form. Table 4 provides a summary of the C-band and Ku-band transmission parameters (antenna envelope, power densities, etc.) coordinated with adjacent satellites in the frame of generic agreements. 17

Table 2. ARSAT-2 Typical C-Band Transmission Parameters Assigned Emission Tx E/S Gain Uplink EIRP Downlink Rx E/S Gain C/I Criterion Carrier ID Bandwidth Designator (dBi) (dBW) EIRP (dBW) (dBi) (dB) (MHz) 1 60K0G7W 0.06 45.3 9.08 7.7 38 18.5 2 4M50G7W 4.5 45.3 27.83 26.8 38.0 19.2 3 9M00G7W 9.0 45.3 30.83 29.8 38.0 19.2 4 18M0G7W 18.0 45.3 33.83 32.8 38.0 19.2 7 36M0G7W 36.0 45.3 36.83 35.8 38.0 19.2 8 72M0G7W 72.0 51.4 39.84 41.9 38.0 21.9 9 88M0G7W 88.0 51.4 40.74 41.9 40.0 21.9 Table 3. ARSAT-2 Typical Ku-Band Transmission Parameters Assigned Emission Tx E/S Gain Uplink EIRP Downlink Rx E/S Gain C/I Criterion Carrier ID Bandwidth Designator (dBi) (dBW) EIRP (dBW) (dBi) (dB) (MHz) 1 60K0G7W 0.06 49.5 ‐2.22 18.1 41.3 18.5 2 4M50G7W 4.5 49.5 16.48 36.8 41.3 19.2 3 9M00G7W 9.0 49.5 19.48 39.8 41.3 19.2 4 18M0G7W 18.0 49.5 22.48 42.8 41.3 19.2 7 36M0G7W 36.0 49.5 25.48 45.8 41.3 20.9 8 72M0G7W 72.0 56.9 27.17 51.9 41.3 23.2 Table 4. Transmission Parameters agreed with adjacent slots for generic coordination Ground station antenna envelope: 29 – 25 log C band EIRP downlink density: -33 dBW/Hz C band uplink power density (at antenna flange): -38.7 dBW/Hz Ku band EIRP downlink density: -22.6 dBW/Hz Ku band uplink power density (at antenna flange): -50 dBW/Hz 2.0 C-Band PFD Analyses (§ 25.114(d)(5)) ARSAT will operate the ARSAT-2 satellite such that all C-band downlink transmissions will comply with the PFD limits of §25.208(a). The maximum C-band downlink EIRP density that 18

will be transmitted is -36.6 dBW/Hz. Table Z shows the maximum PFD levels that will occur at various angles of arrival using a downlink EIRP density of -32 dBW/Hz and demonstrates compliance with §25.208. Table Z. Maximum C-Band PFD Levels on ground of ARSAT-2 Applicable PFD Limit for Spreading Gain Worst Case PFD Level at Angle of PFD Margin Angle of Arrival Loss Contour Angle of Arrival Arrival (dB) (dBW/m2/4 KHz) (dBW/m2) (dB) (dBW/m2/4 KHz) 0° ‐152.0 ‐163.4 ‐2.5 ‐159.9 7.9 5° ‐152.0 ‐163.3 ‐2.4 ‐159.8 7.8 10° ‐149.5 ‐163.2 ‐2.3 ‐159.5 10.0 15° ‐147.0 ‐163.0 ‐2.0 ‐159.1 12.1 20° ‐144.5 ‐162.9 ‐1.7 ‐158.7 14.2 25° ‐142.0 ‐162.8 ‐1.3 ‐158.2 16.2 72° (Peak) ‐142.0 ‐162.1 ‐0.2 ‐156.4 14.4 19


Document Created: 2016-03-04 16:35:01
Document Modified: 2016-03-04 16:35:01
© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC