INM EX-parte letter

LETTER submitted by Inmarsat Inc.

Inmarsat Letter

2017-11-20

This document pretains to SAT-PDR-20161115-00120 for Petition for Declaratory Ruling on a Satellite Space Stations filing.

IBFS_SATPDR2016111500120_1305533

                                                                         1101 Connecticut Ave, NW
                                                                                        Suite 1200
                                                                            Washington, DC 20036
                                                                                               USA

                                                                              T +1 202 248 5150
                                                                              F +1 202 248 5177
                                                                              W    inmarsat.com



                                                                      20 November 2017


Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary
Federal Communications Commission
445 Twelfth Street, SW
Washington, DC 20554


Re: Written Ex Parte Presentation
ViaSat, Inc. Petition for Declaratory Ruling Granting Access to the U.S. Market for a
Non-geostationary Orbit (“NGSO”) Satellite Network, IBFS File No. SATPDR-
20161115-00120

Dear Ms. Dortch:

Pursuant to 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, Inmarsat, Inc (“Inmarsat”) submits this ex parte letter
regarding the above-referenced ViaSat, Inc. (“ViaSat”) petition for U.S. market access
for a non-geostationary satellite orbit (“NGSO”) fixed-satellite service (“FSS”) system in
the Ka and V bands.1 The ViaSat application seeks market access to the United States for
a NGSO satellite system operating under the authority of the government of the
Netherlands.2

In this proceeding, Inmarsat filed a Petition to Deny3 that urged the Commission to deny
ViaSat’s request to use certain portions of Ka-band spectrum for inter-satellite links
(ISLs) for various reasons that still remain unresolved. In a letter filed by Hughes4
addressing this specific matter Hughes reiterates its position that the Commission dismiss
ViaSat’s request for ISL use of the Ka-band or alternatively defer consideration of
ViaSat’s proposed ISLs. Hughes also indicated that if the Commission grants ViaSat’s
ISL operations it should at least impose conditions to prevent harmful interference to
geostationary orbit (“GSO”) FSS operations. Inmarsat fully appreciates and agrees with

1
  See IBFS File No. SATPDR-20161115-00120.
2
  See ITU fling DREBBELSAT BR IFIC 2825/02/08/2016.
3
  See Inmarsat Petition to Deny filed on 26 June 2017
4
  See Letter from Jennifer A. Manner, Hughes, to Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary, FCC, IBFS File
No. SAT-PDR-20161115-00120 (Nov. 3, 2017).


Hughes that any operation of ISLs in the Ka-band, or any FSS band, would need to be
operated in such a manner as not to cause interference to GSO FSS operations or any
other services in those bands.

However, the Commission does not have jurisdiction to authorize or place conditions on
ViaSat’s proposed NGSO to GSO transmissions and it is unclear why ViaSat is seeking
authority for these operations from the Commission. The Netherlands, not the United
States, is the filing administration of the proposed ViaSat NGSO system5, and although
the Commission is well within its rights to impose conditions on how that NGSO system
will provide services in the U.S. and its territories, it is not clear how transmissions from
a non-US licensed NGSO system to GSO satellites fall under the authority of the
Commission. The Commission cannot authorize a foreign licensed NGSO space station
in the same manner as it licenses FSS earth stations, including earth stations in motion
that operate in US territories and on US aircraft and ships, which the Commission has full
jurisdiction to place conditions on. For example a condition that the Appendix 4 NGSO
FSS system filing to the ITU include the ISL links and acknowledgment that the
operations are under RR No. 4.4 can only be accomplished through the ITU filing
administration. Moreover, the filing administration is responsible for addressing potential
interference that may arise from its filed space station transmissions not an administration
where the system seeks authorization to operate.

Therefore, above and beyond the reasons outlined in Inmarsat’s Petition to Deny, the lack
of Commission jurisdiction to authorize and place conditions on a NGSO system,
operating under the authority of the government of the Netherlands, to communicate with
a GSO space station renders ViaSat’s request moot and it should be denied.



                                                Respectfully submitted,

                                                /s/ Giselle G. Creeser
                                                Giselle G. Creeser
                                                Director, Regulatory




5
  The Netherlands NGSO filing DREBBELSAT does not indicate operation of inter-satellite
links.



Document Created: 2017-11-20 12:16:58
Document Modified: 2017-11-20 12:16:58

© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC