Attachment letter

letter

LETTER submitted by EchoStar Satellite

letter

2003-04-04

This document pretains to SAT-PDR-20020315-00025 for Petition for Declaratory Ruling on a Satellite Space Stations filing.

IBFS_SATPDR2002031500025_718152

 STEPTOE & JOHNSON ur                                                                   Washington,0C20000.—tr0s—
                                                                                        Telephone 202.429.3000
                ATTORNEYS AT LAW                                                        Facsimile 202.429.3902
                                                                                        WWW.Steptoe.com

Pantelis Michalopoulos                           APR 0 8 2003
202.429.6494
pmichalo@steptoe.com                              Policy Branch

                                               international Bureati

April 4, 2003
                                                            rECEIVED
VIA HAND DELIVERY
                                                               APR ~ 4 2003
                                                                              5      commsaiond
Marlene H. Dortch        _                                        commumcntions CC
Secretr;.ry                                               *opage ofmt 500.
Federal Communications Commission
455 12th Street, S.W.
Washington, DC 20554

Re:     EchoStar Satellite Corporation, File Nos. 167—SAT—P/LA—95; 168—SAT—P/LA—95; 54—
        SAT—AMEND—96; SAT—MOD—20010608—00055; SAT—AMD—20030127—00003; 36—
        DSS—LA—94; 37—DSS—P/LA—94; 154—SAT—AMEND—95; SAT—MOD—20010608—00054;
        SAT—AMD—20030127—00004

        Loral SpaceCom Corporation, File No. SAT—PDR—20020315—00025

Dear Ms. Dortch:

         EchoStar Satellite Corporation ("EchoStar") hereby respectfully requests that the
Commission place on expedited public notice and grant as soon as possible EchoStar‘s above—
captioned applications, which relate to the Ku—band and Ka—band payloads on the soon—to—be—
launched EchoStar IX satellite, notwithstanding that certain issues concerning foreign licensing
for the satellite‘s C—band payload (to be operated by Loral) may remain unresolved. EchoStar
fears that any further delay of this proceeding could cause yet another postponement of the
EchoStar IX launch, preventing consumers from receiving the benefits from prompt use of the
spectrum and imposing great cost on EchoStar. As discussed below, the Commission may grant
the Ku—band and Ka—band authorizations and permit launch and operation of EchoStar IX, even
if it determines that it requires additional information that is in the custody of Loral and/or the
Papua New Guinea administration regarding the licensing of the C—band payload. The foreign
licensing issues can and should be resolved in the context of the Commission‘s evaluation of
Loral‘s above—captioned petition, without any need to hold up the licensing of the domestic
payloads and launch of the satellite.

        As the Commission is aware, the EchoStar IX satellite is a hybrid Ku—band and Ka—band
Fixed—Satellite Service ("FSS") satellite that will operate at the 121° W.L. orbit location, and that




   WASHINGTON                      PHOENIX                   LOS ANGELES                             LONDON


Marlene H. Dortch
April 4, 2003
Page 2


is set for launch in May 2003. EchoStar will operate the Ku—band and Ka—band payloads on the
satellite pursuant to the modifications to its space station authorizations that are requested in the
above—captioned applications. As for the C—band payload, known to the Commission as Telstar
13, Loral has received an authorization for that payload from Papua New Guinea using that
country‘s PACSTAR—L4 network ITU filing at the 121° W.L. orbit location. Loral has filed a
petition requesting inclusion of the foreign—licensed C—band payload in the Permitted Space
Station list.‘
         On March 14, 2003, EchoStar submitted detailed information to the Commission
regarding the relationship between EchoStar and Loral concerning operation of the various
communications payloads of the EchoStar IX satellite." That submission established, among
other things, that: (1) EchoStar IX will be operated under the direction and control of EchoStar;
(ii) TT&C operations of the EchoStar IX satellite will be performed by Loral with EchoStar‘s
control, pursuant to a 1996 TT&C services contract, in Ku—band frequencies licensed to EchoStar
by the Commission;" and (iii) the Commission has previously authorized a spacecraft sharing
arrangement similar to that contemplated here."

       In addition, correspondence to the Commission from the Papua New Guinea
Telecommunication Authority ("PANGTEL"), Papua New Guinea‘s sole regulatory for
telecommunications (including satellites and ITU filings), confirms that Loral‘s authority to
implement the C—band PACSTAR—L4 filing at 121° W.L. has no effect on EchoStar‘s ability to
exercise direction and control over EchoStar IX, including compliance with an FCC order to




         ‘ See Loral SpaceCom Corporation Petition for Declaratory Ruling for Inclusion of
Telstar 13 C—Band Satellite at 121° W.L. on the Permitted Space Station List, File No. SAT—
PDR—20020315—00025 (filed March 15, 2002).

          See Letter from Pantelis Michalopoulos to Marlene H. Dortch, File Nos. 167—SAT—
P/LA—95; 168—SAT—P/LA—95; 54—SAT—AMEND—96; SAT—MOD—20010608—00055; SAT—AMD—
20030127—00003; 36—DSS—LA—94; 37—DSS—P/LA—94; 154—SAT—AMEND—95; SAT—MOD—
20010608—00054; SAT—AMD—20030127—00004 (dated March 14, 2003) ("EchoStar IX Letter‘).

       3 Some tracking functions will occur in the C—band to facilitate communications with C—
band earth stations, if the Commission authorizes the C—band payload to serve the United States.

         * See generally EchoStar IX Letter.


Marlene H. Dortch
April 4, 2003
Page 3


relocate EchoStar IX from 121° W.L. or cease operations at that location, even if the
Commission were to grant Loral‘s petition.5

      The Commission is seeking additional information that is in the custody of Loral and
Papua New Guinea concerning the licensing of the C—band payload. Grant of EchoStar‘s
application, however, does not in the least implicate any Commission concerns regarding foreign
licensing of the C—band payload, even at a purely theoretical level. This is because, unless the
Commission grants Loral‘s pending petition, the C—band payload on the satellite will not be on
the Permitted Space Station list, meaning that no earth station in the United States will have
permission to communicate with the foreign—licensed satellite. Specifically with respect to the
TT&C frequencies on the satellite, Loral would not be able to conduct TT&C communications
from its Hawley, Pennsylvania unlink center under its license from PNG unless and until the
Commission grants Loral‘s petition. Therefore, EchoStar‘s domestic license would be the only
conceivable authority under which TT&C communications with the satellite could be conducted,
and Loral‘s TT&C operations would be exclusively governed by the TT&C contract with
EchoStar. In other words, the PNG license would simply be irrelevant beyond any doubt to the
operations of the satellite, including the TT&C operations.

         The record in the proceeding already establishes that, even when Loral receives the
requested authority, EchoStar will control the EchoStar IX satellite and that the PNG license
would not at all detract from that control. Nevertheless, if the Commission needs additional
assurances in that regard, it can receive them in the context of evaluating Loral‘s petition,
without need to hold up EchoStar‘s applications.

         EchoStar also notes that, should the Commission timely grant its applications, the launch
of the satellite can and will occur, even as the Commission continues to consider Loral‘s petition
based on the information to be received from Loral and for PNG.

         In sum, EchoStar supports grant of Loral‘s petition to place Telstar 13 on the Permitted
Space Station List. At the same time, there is no reason to delay grant of EchoStar‘s Ku—band
and Ka—band authorizations during the pendency of that separate proceeding. Accordingly,
EchoStar respectfully requests that the Commission place the above—referenced satellite
applications on expedited public notice and grant them as soon as possible to permit the timely
launch and operation of the EchoStar IX satellite, and realization of the significant public interest
benefits associated with that operation.




         * See Letter from Charles S. Punaha, Director General, PANGTEL, to Thomas S. Tycz,
Chief, Satellite Division, FCC International Bureau (dated March 19, 2003).


Marlene H. Dortch
April 4, 2003
Page 4


         Please do not hesitate to contact us if you have any questions concerning this submission.

                                                      Respectfully submitted,




David K. Moskowitz                                    Pantelis MichalopoulGS
Senior Vice President and General Counsel             Carlos M. Nalda
EchoStar Satellite Corporation                        Steptoe & Johnson LLP
5701 South Santa Fe                                   1330 Connecticut Avenue, N.W.
Littleton, CO 80120                                   Washington, DC 20036
(303) 723—1000                                        (202) 429—3000

David R. Goodfriend                                   Counsel for EchoStar Satellite
Director, Legal and Business Affairs                   Corporation
EchoStar Satellite Corporation
1233 20"" Street, N.W., Suite 701
Washington, DC 20036
(202) 293—0981


ce:      All Counsel of Record



Document Created: 2019-04-14 17:40:28
Document Modified: 2019-04-14 17:40:28

© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC