Attachment SES Americom - Grant

This document pretains to SAT-MOD-20110621-00115 for Modification on a Satellite Space Stations filing.

IBFS_SATMOD2011062100115_913874

hn rememnymereron nemgomyteme m # SflT» Filc MODzonoem oons $2434 SAT—MOD—20110621—00115 1B2011002281 SES Americom, Inc. AMC—9 cnnsign 32434 GrantDate_O8 /26 /11 (or other identifier) on Pacy Approved by OMB 3060—0678 .Boestie P . |— oanmiape nes | Fah Date & Time Filed: Jun 21 2011 2:40:20:736PM | International Bureau Al)pm\'cd: File Number: SAT—MOD—20110621—00115 ;’m conditiors _ . Chieff Satellite Policy Branch FCC APPLICATION FOR SPACE AND EARTH STATION:MOD OR AMD — MAIN FORM FCC Use Only FCC 312 MAIN FORM FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY APPLICANT INFORMATION Enter a description of this application to identify it on the main menu: §$2434 (AMC—9) MOD to Alter C—Band Coverage Pattern 6/2011 1—8. Legal Name ofApplicant Name: SES Americom, Inc. Phone Number: 202—478—7137 DBA Fax Number: 202—478—7101 Name: Street: 1129 20th Street NW E—Mail: daniel.mah@ses.com Suite 1000 City: Washington State: DC Country: USA Zipcode: 20036 — Attention: Daniel C.H. Mah

Attachment to Grant IBFS File No. SAT—MOD—20110621—00115 Call Sign $2434 The application of SES Americom, Inc. (SES Americom), IBFS File No. SAT—MOD—20110621—00115, to modify its authorization to operate the AMC—9 space station (Call Sign $2434) at the 83° W.L. orbital location in the 3700—4200 MHz (space—to—Earth), 5925—6425 MHz (Earth—to—space), 11.7—12.2 GHz (space—to—Earth), and 14.0—14.5 GHz (Earth—to—space) frequency bands IS GRANTED. Specifically, SES Americom is authorized to operate the AMC—9 space station with a 0.4—degree change in the north/south orientation of the satellite‘s C—band reflector from the orientation previously authorized. This authorization shall be in accordance with the technical specifications set forth in SES Americom‘s application, Federal Communication Commission (Commission) rules, and is subject to the conditions previously placed on operations of the AMC—9 space station at $3° W.L.‘, and the following additional conditions: 1. We grant the request of SES Americom for waivers of Sections 25.114(d)(14)(ii) and 25.283(c) of the Commission‘s rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 25.114(d)(14)(ii) and 25.283(c). These rules require an applicant to demonstrate that all stored energy will be vented at the spacecraft‘s end of life. AMC—9 is a Thales Alenia (formerly, Alcatel) Spacebus 3000B3 spacecraft that is not designed to vent all of its pressurized systems. Following launch of the spacecraft in June, 2003, three helium pressurant tanks were permanently sealed by firing pyrotechnic valves. As a result, SES Americom states that at the end of AMC—9‘s operational life, there will be helium remaining in the tanks that cannot be vented. SES Americom states that the residual helium in AMC—9‘s three helium tanks have masses of 0.54, 0.54, and 0.55 kg and volumes of 51.6, 51.6, and 51.7 liters at a temperature of 12° Celsius. The pressure of each of the helium tanks is 64.4 bar at a temperature of 12° Celsius. We grant the requested waiver because AMC—9 was launched before Section 25.283(c) became effective and compliance would require direct retrieval of the spacecraft, which is not currently possible. In making this determination, however, we note that the information submitted in the application is not sufficient to support a finding that the intent of the rule would be satisfied by the described procedure for sealing the helium tanks. 2. Grant of this modification application does not change the expiration date of the authorization for AMC—9, which is June 29, 2018. 3. SES Americom is afforded thirty days from the date of release of this grant and authorization to decline this authorization as conditioned. Failure to respond within this period will constitute formal acceptance of the authorization as conditioned. 4. This action is issued pursuant to Section 0.261 of the Commission‘s rules on delegated authority, 47 C.F.R. § 0.261, and is effective immediately. Petitions for reconsideration under Section 1.106 or applications for review under Section 1.115 of the Commission‘s rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.106, 1.115, may be filed within 30 days of the date of the public notice indicating that this action was taken. File # SBT mobp— 20116621 — oo 115 Call Sign 82434 Grant Date os|2s/1) (or other identifier) Torm Dates From O8/25)) o. O6/29/18 International Approved: «with Condifions _ Stephdy/ J. Duall Chief, Satellite Fbfir@ Branch \ See IBFS File Nos. SAT—LOA—20020114—00008 & SAT—AMD—20030722—00133 (grant stamp June 15, 2004); SAT—AMD—20040319—00041& SAT—AMD—20040421—00084 (grant stamp Sept. 3, 2004).

9—16. Name of Contact Representative Name: Karis A. Hastings, Esq. Phone Number: 202—637—5767 Company: Hogan Lovells US LLP Fax Number: 202—637—5910 Street: 555 Thirteenth Street, NW E—Mail: karis.hastings@hoganlovells.com City: Washington State: DC Country: USA Zipcode: 20004—1109 Attention: Relationship: Legal Counsel CLASSIFICATION OF FILING

17. Choose the button next to the classification that applies to this filing for (N/A) b1. Application for License of New Station both questions a. and b. Choose only one (N/A) b2. Application for Registration of New Domestic Receive—Only Station for 17a and only one for 17b. £4 b3. Amendment to a Pending Application & b4. Modification of License or Registration 4 al. Earth Station b5. Assignment of License or Registration @ a2. Space Station b6. Transfer of Control of License or Registration £y b7. Notification of Minor Modification (N/A) b8. Application for License of New Receive—Only Station Using Non—U.S. Licensed Satellite (N/A) b9. Letter of Intent to Use Non—U.S. Licensed Satellite to Provide Service in the United States (N/A) b10. Other (Please specify) (N/A) b11. Application for Earth Station to Access a Non—U.S.satellite Not Currently Authorized to Provide the Proposed Service in the Proposed Frequencies in the United States (N/A) b12. Application for Database Entry gz b13. Amendment to a Pending Database Entry Application g4 b14. Modification of Database Entry 17¢. Is a fee submitted with this application? & IfYes, complete and attach FCC Form 159. If No, indicate reason for fee exemption (see 47 C.FR.Section 1.1114). 3 Governmental Entity C3 Noncommercial educational licensee q4 Other(please explain): 17d. Fee Classification BFY — Space Station Modification(Geostationary)

18. If this filing is in reference to an 19. If this filing is an amendment to a pending application enter both fields, if this filing is a existing station, enter: modification please enter only the file number: (a) Call sign of station: (a) Date pending application was filed: (b) File number: $2434 SATLOA2002011400008 TYPE OF SERVICE 20. NATURE OF SERVICE: This filing is for an authorization to provide or use the following type(s) of service(s): Select all that apply: E a. Fixed Satellite D b. Mobile Satellite l:l c. Radiodetermination Satellite D d. Earth Exploration Satellite E e. Direct to Home Fixed Satellite D £. Digital Audio Radio Service D g. Other (please specify) 21. STATUS: Choose the button next to the applicable status. Choose |22. If earth station applicant, check all that apply. only one. D Using U.S. licensed satellites q73 Common Carrier giy Non—Common Carrier D Using Non—U.S. licensed satellites 23. If applicant is providng INTERNATIONAL COMMON CARRIER service, see instructions regarding Sec. 214 filings. Choose one. Are these facilities: C Connected to a Public Switched Network C3 Not connected to a Public Switched Network € N/A

24. FREQUENCY BAND(S): Place an ‘X" in the box(es) next to all applicable frequency band(s). E a. C—Band (4/6 GHz) E b. Ku—Band (12/14 GHz) [:l c.Other (Please specify upper and lower frequencies in MHz.) Frequency Lower: Frequency Upper: (Please specify additional frequencies in an attachment) TYPE OF STATION 25. CLASS OF STATION: Choose the button next to the class of station that applies. Choose only one. 3 a Fixed Earth Station C3 b. Temporary—Fixed Earth Station «34 c. 12/14 GHz VSAT Network 4 d. Mobile Earth Station , e. Geostationary Space Station £74 £. Non—Geostationary Space Station {74 g. Other (please specify) 26. TYPE OF EARTH STATION FACILITY: «34 Transmit/Receive C3 Transmit—Only 3 Receive—Only ) N/A "For Space Station applications, select N/A."

PURPOSE OF MODIFICATION 27. The purpose of this proposed modification is to: (Place an °X" in the box(es) next to all that apply.) D a —— authorization to add new emission designator and related service D b —— authorization to change emission designator and related service D c —— authorization to increase EIRP and EIRP density D d —— authorization to replace antenna D e —— authorization to add antenna E] f —— authorization to relocate fixed station D g —— authorization to change frequency(ies) D h — authorization to add frequency D i —— authorization to add Points of Communication (satellites & countries) D j —— authorization to change Points of Communication (satellites & countries) k —— authorization for facilities for which environmental assessment and radiation hazard reporting is required D 1 —— authorization to change orbit location D m —— authorization to perform fleet management [j n —— authorization to extend milestones E o —— Other (Please specify)

ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY 28. Would a Commission grant of any proposal in this application or amendment have a significant environmental 3 Yes @ No impact as defined by 47 CFR 1.13077? IfYES, submit the statement as required by Sections 1.1308 and 1.1311 of the Commission‘s rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.1308 and 1.1311, as an exhibit to this application.A Radiation Hazard Study must accompany all applications for new transmitting facilities, major modifications, or major amendments. ALIEN OWNERSHIP Earth station applicants not proposing to provide broadcast, common carrier, aeronautical en route or aeronautical fixed radio station services are not required to respond to Items 30—34. 29. Is the applicant a foreign government or the representative of any foreign government? Cp Yes fod No 30. Is the applicant an alien or the representative of an alien? 4 Yes ®@ No 54 N/A 31. Is the applicant a corporation organized under the laws of any foreign government? C Yes @ No o N/A 32. Is the applicant a corporation of which more than one—fifth of the capital stock is owned of record or voted by £3 Yes g No 54 N/A aliens or their representatives or by a foreign government or representative thereof or by any corporation organized under the laws of a foreign country?

33. Is the applicant a corporation directly or indirectly controlled by any other corporation of which more than @ Yes q3 No ;3 N/A one—fourth of the capital stock is owned of record or voted by aliens, their representatives, or by a foreign government or representative thereof or by any corporation organized under the laws of a foreign country? 34. If any answer to questions 29, 30, 31, 32 and/or 33 is Yes, attach as an exhibit an identification of the aliens or Exhibit A foreign entities, their nationality, their relationship to the applicant, and the percentage of stock they own or vote. BASIC QUALIFICATIONS 35. Does the Applicant request any waivers or exemptions from any of the Commussion‘s Rules? . Yes «y No IfYes, attach as an exhibit, copies of the requests for waivers or exceptions with supporting documents. 36. Has the applicant or any party to this application or amendment had any FCC station authorization or license £4 Yes @ No revoked or had any application for an initial, modification or renewal of FCC station authorization, license, or construction permit denied by the Commission? IfYes, attach as an exhibit, an explination of circumstances.

37. Has the applicant, or any party to this application or amendment, or any party directly or indirectly controlling C3 Yes @NO the applicant ever been convicted of a felony by any state or federal court? IfYes, attach as an exhibit, an explination of circumstances. 38. Has any court finally adjudged the applicant, or any person directly or indirectly controlling the applicant, .D Yes @No guilty of unlawfully monopolizing or attemptiing unlawfully to monopolize radio communication, directly or indirectly, through control of manufacture or sale of radio apparatus, exclusive traffic arrangement or any other means or unfair methods of competition?IfYes, attach as an exhibit, an explanation of circumstances 39. Is the applicant, or any person directly or indirectly controlling the applicant, currently a party in any pending .D Yes @.No matter referred to in the preceding two items? If yes, attach as an exhinit, an explanation of the circumstances. 40. If the applicant is a corporation and is applying for a space station license, attach as an exhibit the names, address, and citizenship of those stockholders owning a record and/or voting 10 percent or more of the Filer‘s voting stock and the percentages so held. In the case of fiduciary control, indicate the beneficiary(ies) or class of Exhibit B beneficiaries. Also list the names and addresses of the officers and directors of the Filer.

41. By checking Yes, the undersigned certifies, that neither applicant nor any other party to the application is Yes £3 No subject to a denial of Federal benefits that includes FCC benefits pursuant to Section 5301 of the Anti—Drug Act of 1988, 21 U.S.C. Section 862, because of a conviction for possession or distribution of a controlled substance. See 47 CFR 1.2002(b) for the meaning of "party to the application&gquot; for these purposes. 42a. Does the applicant intend to use a non—U.S. licensed satellite to provide service in the United States? IfYes, «4 Yes ) No answer 42b and attach an exhibit providing the information specified in 47 C.F.R. 25.137, as appropriate. If No, proceed to question 43. 42b. What administration has licensed or is in the process of licensing the space station? If no license will be issued, what administration has coordinated or is in the process of coordinating the space station? 43. Description. (Summarize the nature of the application and the services to be provided). (If the complete description does not appear in this box, please go to the end of the form to view it in its entirety.) SES Americom, Inc. hereby seeks a modification of the license for AMC—9, call sign $2434, to reflect a slightly altered C—band coverage pattern than what was originally authorized for the satellite at this orbital location. Narrative 10

43a. Geographic Service Rule Certification @ A By selecting A, the undersigned certifies that the applicant is not subject to the geographic service or geographic coverage requirements specified in 47 C.F.R. Part 25. y B By selecting B, the undersigned certifies that the applicant is subject to the geographic service or geographic coverage requirements specified in 47 C.FE.R. Part 25 and will comply with such requirements. «y C By selecting C, the undersigned certifies that the applicant is subject to the geographic service or geographic coverage requirements specified in 47 C.F.R. Part 25 and will not comply with such requirements because it is not feasible as a technical matter to do so, or that, while technically feasible, such services would require so many compromises in satellite design and operation as to make it economically unreasonable. A narrative description and technical analysis demonstrating this claim are attached. CERTIFICATION The Applicant waives any claim to the use of any particular frequency or of the electromagnetic spectrum as against the regulatory power of the United States because of the previous use of the same, whether by license or otherwise, and requests an authorization in accordance with this application. The applicant certifies that grant of this application would not cause the applicant to be in violation of the spectrum aggregation limit in 47 CFR Part 20. All statements made in exhibits are a material part hereof and are incorporated herein as if set out in full in this application. The undersigned, individually and for the applicant, hereby certifies that all statements made in this application and in all attached exhibits are true, complete and correct to the best of his or her knowledge and belief, and are made in good faith. 11

44. Applicant is a (an): (Choose the button next to applicable response.) £3 Individual g34 Unincorporated Association «4 Partnership &gy Corporation C Governmental Entity g4 Other (please specify) 45. Name of Person Signing 46. Title of Person Signing Daniel C.H. Mah Regulatory Counsel ——> WILLFUL FALSE STATEMENTS MADE ON THIS FORM ARE PUNISHABLE BY FINE AND / OR IMPRISONMENT (U.S. Code, Title 18, Section 1001), AND/OR REVOCATION OF ANY STATION AUTHORIZATION (U.S. Code, Title 47, Section 312(a)(1)), AND/OR FORFEITURE (U.S. Code, Title 47, Section 503). 12

FCC NOTICE REQUIRED BY THE PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT The public reporting for this collection of information is estimated to average 2 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the required data, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. If you have any comments on this burden estimate, or how we can improve the collection and reduce the burden it causes you, please write to the Federal Communications Commission, AMD—PERM, Paperwork Reduction Project (3060—0678), Washington, DC 20554. We will also accept your comments regarding the Paperwork Reduction Act aspects of this collection via the Internet if you send them to PRA@fcec.gov. PLEASE DO NOT SEND COMPLETED FORMS TO THIS ADDRESS. Remember — You are not required to respond to a collection of information sponsored by the Federal government, and the government may not conduct or sponsor this collection, unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number or if we fail to provide you with this notice. This collection has been assigned an OMB control number of 3060—0678. THE FOREGOING NOTICE IS REQUIRED BY THE PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT OF 1995, PUBLIC LAW 104—13, OCTOBER 1, 1995, 44 U.S.C. SECTION 3507. 13

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of N/ N/ N/ NZ/NZ/NZ SES AMERICOM, INC. File No. SAT—MOD— Call Sign $2434 Application for Modification of AMC—9 Fixed—Satellite Space Station License REQUEST OF SES AMERICOM, INC. SES Americom, Inc. ("SES Americom"), hereby respectfully requests modification of its license for the AMC—9 fixed—satellite space station at 83° W.L. to reflect a slightly altered C—band coverage pattern than what was originally authorized for the satellite at this orbital location. Grant of the requested authority will enable SES Americom to provide enhanced service to the Southern United States, Mexico and Central America in response to customer demand. A completed FCC Form 312 is attached, and SES Americom incorporates by reference the technical information previously provided in support of AMC—9.‘ In addition, SES Americom is providing information relating to the proposed modification to the AMC—9 license in the attached Technical Appendix. ! See File Nos. SAT—LOA—20020114—00008; SAT—AMD—20030722—00133; SAT—AMD— 20040319—00041; & SAT—AMD—20040421—00084.

MODIFICATION AMC—9 is a C/Ku—band hybrid spacecraft launched in 2003 and operating at 83° W.L.‘ In response to the service requirements of a potential customer, SES Americom seeks modification of the AMC—9 license to reflect a repointing of the satellite‘s C—band reflector slightly southward. SES Americom has already implemented this change pursuant to a grant of Special Temporary Authority," and now seeks modification of the AMC—9 license in order to retain the altered coverage configuration on a long—term basis. As SES Americom described in the AMC—9 STA Request, the repointing involved a .4 degree change in the north/south orientation of the C—band reflector from what was previously authorized in order to strengthen the C—band signal levels over the southern United States, Mexico and Central America." The AMC—9 C—band and Ku—band reflectors are on different gimbals, and SES Americom has reoriented only the C—band reflector. No change in the satellite‘s Ku—band footprint is planned. Retaining the revised orientation of the AMC—9 C—band reflector will not adversely affect any other operators. Contour maps showing the AMC—9 C—band coverage area with the proposed reorientation are included in the attached Technical Appendix. As the Technical Appendix demonstrates, the small shift in AMC—9‘s C—band antenna coverage has a negligible effect on the interference environment in which adjacent satellites operate. The closest operational C—band satellite to the west of AMC—9 is the Brazilian—licensed Brasilsat B4 2 See Call Sign $2434, File Nos. SAT—LOA—20020114—00008 & SAT—AMD—20030722— 00133 (grant—stamped June 15, 2004); SAT—AMD—20040319—00041 & SAT—AMD—20040421— 00084 (grant—stamped Sept. 3, 2004). 3 See Call Sign $2434, File No. SAT—STA—20110301—00043 ("AMC—9 STA Request"), grant—stamped Mar. 25, 2011. 4 iSee id., Natrative at 1—2.

spacecraft at 84° W.L., which has coverage of Brazil and parts of South America, but not of Central America, Mexico, or the U.S." To the east of AMC—9, the closest C—band satellite is Intelsat 3R, which has been authorized by the Commission to operate temporarily at 81° W.L. pursuant to the International Telecommunication Union ("ITU") filings of the Administration of Argentina." The operations of AMC—9 with the slight change in pointing discussed herein continue to be consistent with SES Americom‘s coordination agreements, including its agreements with Brazil and Argentina. The Commission has generally permitted satellite operators the flexibility to design and modify their networks in response to customer requirements, absent compelling countervailing public interest considerations.‘ Here, grant of the requested modification will allow SES Americom to operate AMC—9 with a C—band coverage pattern that has been adjusted to respond to customer demand. WAIVER REQUEST SES Americom seeks any necessary waiver of Sections 25.114(d)(14)(ii) and 25.283(c) of the Commussion‘s rules in connection with the requested AMC—9 modification. Grant of the waiver is consistent with Commission policy: The Commission may waive a rule for good cause shown. Waiver is appropriate if special circumstances warrant a deviation from the general rule and such deviation would * See http://www.lyngsat—maps.com/maps/brasilb4_national.html; http://www.satbeams.com/footprints. 6 See Call Sign PAS—2R, File No. SAT—STA—20100402—00063 (grant—stamped Aug. 3, 2010). 7 See, e.g. AMSC Subsidiary Corporation, 13 FCC Red 12316 at «| 8 (IB 1998) (the Commission generally leaves space station design decisions to the licensee "because the licensee is in a better position to determine how to tailor its system to meet the particular needs of its customers.") (footnote omitted).

better serve the public interest than would strict adherence to the general rule. Generally, the Commuission may grant a waiver of its rules in a particular case if the relief requested would not undermine the policy objective of the rule in question and would otherwise serve the public interest." Sections 25.114(d)(14)(i1i) and 25.283(c) address requirements relating to venting stored energy sources at the spacecraft‘s end of life." AMC—9 is a Thales Alenia (formerly Alcatel) Spacebus 3000B3 model spacecraft and was constructed and launched before the venting requirement in Section 25.283(c) came into effect. As described in more detail in the attached Technical Appendix, the Spacebus 3000B3 has three helium tanks that were sealed following completion of the launch phase and will therefore retain residual pressure at end of life. Given the spacecraft design, it is physically impossible for SES Americom to vent these tanks in order to comply with Section 25.283(c). Under Commission precedent, grant of a waiver is warranted. In a number of cases involving various spacecraft models with similar limitations, the Commission has waived Section 25.283(c) to permit launch and operation of spacecraft that do not allow for full venting of pressure vessels at end of life, based on a finding that modifying the space station design at a late stage of construction would pose an undue hard.ship.10 In the case of AMC—9, which was 8 PanAmSat Licensee Corp., 17 FCC Red 10483, 10492 (Sat. Div. 2002) (footnotes omitted). ' 9 Section 25.283(c) contains the substantive venting requirement, and Section 25.114(d)(14)(ii) requires applicants to submit information that addresses "whether stored energy will be removed at the spacecraft‘s end of life." 47 C.F.R. § 25.114(d)(14)(ii). !0 See, eg., DIRECTYEnterprises LLC, File No. SAT—LOA—20090807—00086, Call Sign $2797, grant—stamped Dec. 15, 2009, Attachment at «[ 4 (granting a partial waiver of Section 25.283(c) for DIRECTV 12, a Boeing 702 model spacecraft, on grounds that requiring modification of satellite would present an undue hardship); Pand4mSat Licensee Corp., File Nos. SAT—MOD—20070207—00027, SAT—AMD—20070716—00102, Call Sign $2237, grant—stamped Oct. 4, 2007, Attachment at [ 7 (granting a partial waiver of Section 25.283(c) for Intelsat 11 on grounds of undue hardship).

launched and operational before the venting requirements came into effect, there is no question of bringing the satellite into compliance with the rule. The Commission has expressly recognized this, finding a waiver of Section 25.283(c) to be justified for in—orbit spacecraft that cannot satisfy the rule‘s requirements. For example, in a decision involving the SES Americom AMC—5 satellite, which like AMC—9 was launched before Section 25.283(c) took effect, the Commission waived the rule on its own motion, observing that venting the spacecraft‘s sealed helium tanks "would require direct retrieval of the spacecraft.""‘ The same practical obstacle is present here. Because AMC—9 is already in orbit, SES Americom can do nothing to enable full venting of residual pressure in the helium tanks. Given this reality, waiver is clearly warranted; there is no possible public interest benefit in requiring strict adherence to a rule with which the licensee is incapable of complying. The inability to vent all residual helium will not compromise safe disposal of the spacecraft. The pressure remaining in the tanks will be well below their tolerances, and the residual helium is inert, posing no risk of chemical energy release. Under these circumstances, grant of any necessary waiver of Section 25.283(c) is warranted. U File No. SAT—MOD—20100706—00154, Call Sign $2156, grant—stamped Jan. 20, 2011, Attachment at [ 4. See also XMRadio Inc., File No. SAT—MOD—20100722—00165, Call Sign $2616, grant—stamped Oct. 14, 2010, Attachment at 2 (waiving Section 25.283(c) for XM—4, a Boeing 702 model spacecraft, because "modification of the spacecraft would present an undue hardship, since XM—4 is an in—orbit space station and venting XM—4‘s helium and xenon tanks would require direct retrieval of the satellite, which is not currently possible").

CONCLUSION For the foregoing reasons, SES Americom respectfully requests modification of the AMC—9 license to reflect repointing of the C—band reflector as described herein. Respectfully submitted, SES AMERICOM, INC. By: /s/ Daniel C.H. Mah Of Counsel Daniel C. H. Mah Karis A. Hastings Regulatory Counsel Hogan Lovells US LLP SES Americom, Inc. 555 13"" Street, N.W. Four Research Way Washington, D.C. 20004—1109 Princeton, NJ 08540 Tel: (202) 637—5600 Dated: June 20, 2011

TECHNICAL APPENDIX 1. Introduction This technical appendix is submitted in support of the application of SES Americom, Inc. ("SES Americom") for a modification of its license for the AMC—9 spacecraft at 83° W.L. to reflect a slightly altered C—band coverage pattern than what was originally authorized for the satellite at this orbital location. SES Americom incorporates by reference herein the technical information it has already provided with respect to AMC—9," and provides here technical information that is changing as a result of the proposed modification. 2. Gain Contours SES Americom is attaching contour maps (Figures 1 to 4) showing the revised C—band EIRP and G/T patterns for typical horizontally and vertically polarized transponders of AMC—9 at 83° W.L.* 3. Link Budgets and Interference Analysis An interference analysis was submitted to the Commission in connection with the initial operation of AMC—9 at 83° W.L. demonstrating that operation of AMC—9 was compatible with adjacent satellites and with the Commission‘s two—degree spacing requirements.* The analysis herein shows that the revised pointing of the AMC—9 C—band antenna has a negligible impact on the interference environment for adjacent satellites. The C—band EIRP for AMC—9 over Mexico with the original pointing ranged from 36 to 40 dBW; with the revised pointing the range is 38 to 40.9 dBW. As a result, AMC—9‘s C— band EIRP over Mexico increased by a typical value of 1 dB, with an increase of 2 dB at the edge of Mexican coverage (from 36 to 38 dBW). To determine the effect of this 2 dB increase in the EIRP at the edge of coverage we have computed the C/I in a non— SES carrier from an orbital location that is two degrees away from 83° W.L., serving Mexico. The C/I computation is based on the following parameters: a) EIRP of the wanted (i.e., non—SES) satellite: 37 dBW b) EIRP of the interfering (SES) satellite: 36 dBW with original configuration of AMC—9, and 38 dBW with repointing c) Receiver earth station diameter: 4.5 m d) Wanted carrier threshold C/N: 8 dB e) C/I in the victim carrier with interference from AMC—9 current configuration: 23.1 dB ! See File Nos. SAT—LOA—20020114—00008; SAT—AMD—20030722—00133; SAT—AMD— 20040319—00041; & SAT—AMD—20040421—00084. " As discussed above, no change is proposed in the AMC—9 Ku—band coverage pattern. ° See Call Sign $2434, File No. SAT—AMD—20040421—00084, Technical Appendix, Attachment B.

f) C/l in the victim carrier with interference from AMC—9 after repointing: 21.1 dB g) C/N in victim carrier with interference from AMC—9 with original configuration: 7.87 dB h) C/N in victim carrier with interference from AMC—9 with re—pointing: 7.79 dB The increase in the victim‘s system noise temperature due to AMC—9 with the original configuration is 0.13 dB, or 3%. With the revised pointing, the noise temperature increase is slightly degraded to 0.21 dB, or 5%. In both of these cases, the system noise temperature increase is less than the 6% Delta T/T ITU coordination trigger criteria; 7.e., internationally, if a 6% increase in noise temperature is not exceeded, then coordination is not needed between the concerned networks. As discussed above in the narrative, the closest adjacent C—band satellites to 83° W.L. are the Brazilian—licensed Brasilsat B4 spacecraft at 84° W.L. and Intelsat 3R, which has been authorized by the Commission to operate temporarily at 81° W.L. pursuant to the ITU filings of the Administration of Argentina. Operation of AMC—9 with the repointing discussed herein is consistent with the terms of the existing coordination agreements applicable to operation of AMC—9 and the Brazilian and Argentinean networks. 4. Schedule S As discussed above, the proposed modification of the AMC—9 license will not result in any material changes to the spacecraft‘s operating characteristics or to the interference environment. As a result, the information requested in Schedule S duplicates information that is already on file with the Commission concerning the technical parameters of AMC—9‘s operation. In similar cases involving requests for minor operational changes, such as slight offsets from the nominal orbital position, the Satellite Division has not required the submission of a new Schedule S.* Accordingly, SES Americom is not filing a new Schedule S with this application. SES Americom will nevertheless prepare and submit a Schedule S if requested to do so by the Satellite Division. 5. Orbital Debris Mitigation Statement This section provides the information required under Section 25.114(d)(14) of the Commission‘s Rules. §25.114(d)(14)(i): SES Americom has assessed and limited the amount of debris released in a planned manner during normal operations of AMC—9. No debris is generated during normal on—station operations, and the spacecraft will be in a stable configuration. On—station operations require stationkeeping within the +/— 0.05 degree N—S and E—W control box, thereby ensuring adequate collision avoidance distance from other satellites in geosynchronous orbit. In the event that co—location of this and another satellite is required, use of the proven Inclination—Eccentricity (I—E) separation * See, e.g., File No. SAT—MOD—20040405—00076 (PanAmSat request for authority to operate SBS—6 at 74.05° W.L. rather than 74.0° W.L.). 2

method can be employed. This strategy is presently in use by SES to ensure proper operation and safety of multiple satellites within one orbital box.. SES Americom has also assessed and limited the probability of the space station becoming a source of orbital debris by collisions with small debris or meteoroids that could cause loss of control and prevent post—mission disposal. The design of AMC—9 locates all sources of stored energy within the body of the structure, which provides protection from small orbital debris. SES Americom requires that spacecraft manufacturers assess the probability of micrometeorite damage that can cause any loss of functionality. This probability is then factored into the ultimate spacecraft probability of success. Any significant probability of damage would need to be mitigated in order for the spacecraft design to meet SES Americom‘s required probability of success of the mission. SES Americom has taken steps to limit the effects of any collisions through shielding, the placement of components, and the use of redundant systems. §25.114(d)(14)(ii): SES Americom has assessed and limited the probability of accidental explosions during and after completion of mission operations. As part of the Safety Data Package submission for SES Americom spacecraft, an extensive analysis is completed by the spacecraft manufacturer, reviewing each potential hazard relating to accidental explosions. A matrix is generated indicating the worst—case effect, the hazard cause, and the hazard controls available to minimize the severity and the probability of occurrence. Each subsystem is analyzed for potential hazards, and the Safety Design Package is provided for each phase of the program running from design phase, qualification, manufacturing and operational phase of the spacecraft. Also, the spacecraft manufacturer generates a Failure Mode Effects and Criticality Analysis for the spacecraft to identify all potential mission failures. The risk of accidental explosion is included as part of this analysis. This analysis indicates failure modes, possible causes, methods of detection, and compensating features of the spacecraft design. The design of the AMC—9 spacecraft is such that the risk of explosion is minimized both during and after mission operations. In designing and building the spacecraft, the manufacturer took steps to ensure that debris generation will not result from the conversion of energy sources on board the satellite into energy that fragments the satellite. All propulsion subsystem pressure vessels, which have high margins of safety at launch, have even higher margins in orbit, since use of propellants and pressurants during launch decreases the propulsion system pressure. Burst tests are performed on all pressure vessels during qualification testing to demonstrate a margin of safety against burst. Bipropellant mixing is prevented by the use of valves that prevent backwards flow in propellant and pressurization lines. All pressures, including those of the batteries, are monitored by telemetry. At the end of operational life, after the satellite has reached its final disposal orbit, onboard sources of stored energy will be depleted or secured, and the batteries will be discharged. However, at the end of AMC—9‘s operational life, there will be helium remaining in the tanks that cannot be vented. Following insertion of the spacecraft into

orbit, the spacecraft manufacturer permanently sealed the helium tanks by firing pyrotechnic valves. Information regarding the residual helium in the tanks is as follows: ank Volume [1] ressure [bar emp. [deg C Helium mass He1 51.6 4 12 54 He2 51.6 A 12 0.54 He3 1.7 64.4 12 .55 The residual helium is inert, posing no risk of chemical energy release. Furthermore, the tanks are well shielded, and the residual pressure in the tanks will be well below their maximum rating. In the narrative portion of this application, SES Americom requests any necessary waiver of Sections 25.114(d)(14)(ii) and 25.283(c) in connection with the residual helium that will remain in these tanks at the end of the satellite‘s life. §25.114(d)(14)(iii): SES Americom has assessed and limited the probability of the space station becoming a source of debris by collisions with large debris or other operational space stations. Specifically, SES Americom has assessed the possibility of collision with satellites located at, or reasonably expected to be located at, the requested orbital location or assigned in the vicinity of that location. Regarding avoidance of collisions with controlled objects, in general, if a geosynchronous satellite is controlled within its specified longitude and latitude stationkeeping limits, collision with another controlled object (excluding where the satellite is collocated with another object) is the direct result of that object entering the allocated space. The instant application seeks authority for continued operation of AMC—9 at the 83° W.L. orbital location. SES Americom is not aware of any other FCC— or non—FCC licensed spacecraft that are operational or planned to be deployed at 83° W.L. or to nearby orbital locations such that there would be an overlap with the requested stationkeeping volume of AMC—9. SES Americom uses the Space Data Center ("SDC") system from the Space Data Association to monitor the risk of close approach of its satellites with other objects. Any close encounters (separation of less than 10 km) are flagged and investigated in more detail. If required, avoidance maneuvers are performed to eliminate the possibility of collisions. During any relocation, the moving spacecraft is maneuvered such that it is at least 30 km away from the synchronous radius at all times. In most cases, much larger — deviation from the synchronous radius is used. In addition, the SDC system is used to ensure no close encounter occurs during the move. When de—orbit of a spacecraft is

required, the initial phase is treated as a satellite move, and the same precautions are used to ensure collision avoidance. §25.114(d)(14)(iv): Post—mission disposal of the satellite from operational orbit will be accomplished by carrying out maneuvers to a higher orbit. The upper stage engine remains part of the satellite, and there is no re—entry phase for either component. The fuel budget for elevating the satellite to a disposal orbit is included in the satellite design. SES Americom plans to maneuver AMC—9 to a disposal orbit at end of life with a minimum perigee of 294.8 km above the normal operational altitude. The proposed disposal orbit altitude complies with the altitude resulting from application of the IADC formula based on the following calculation: Area of the satellite (average aspect area): 68 m Mass of the spacecraft: 1705.7 kg CR (solar radiation pressure coefficient): 1.5 Therefore the minimum disposal orbit perigee altitude as calculated under the IADC formula is: ‘ 36,021 km + (1000 x CR x A/m) = 36080.8 km, or 294.8 km above the GSO arc (35,786 km). SES Americom intends to reserve 42.7 kg of fuel in order to account for post—mission disposal of AMC—9. SES Americom has assessed fuel—gauging uncertainty and has provided an adequate margin of fuel reserve to address the assessed uncertainty.

CONTOUR MAPS FOR PROPOSED REORIENTATION OF C—BAND ANTENNA ON AMC—9 SPACECRAFT AT 83° W.L. Figure 1: EIRP contour (dBW) for typical transponder with vertical downlink polarization Figure 2: G/T contour (dB/K) for typical transponder with horizontal uplink polarization Figure 3: EIRP contour (dBW) for typical transponder with horizontal downlink polarization Figure 4: G/T contour (dB/K) for typical transponder with vertical uplink polarization



Figure 3 60.00 [=> 40.00 |— ~160.00 ~140.00 ~120.00 ~100.00 —80.00 —60.00

80.00 t ‘ T t . ~w \‘1 D T ‘ l 3 se wl <—> =< —~* <— \ 60.00|— < * 40.00 5* 20.00—) O41g+ 0.00 i 1 1 1 1 1 "na 1 | | —160.00 ~140.00 ~120.00 ~100.00 —80.00 —60.00 ~40.00

DECLARATION OF KRISH JONNALAGADDA |, Krish Jonnalagadda, hereby certify under penalty of perjury that | am the technically qualified person responsible for preparation of the technical information contained in the foregoing exthibit; that I am familiar with the technical requirements of Part 25; and that | either prepared or reviewed the technical information contained in the exhibit and that it is complete and accurate to the best of my knowledge, information and belief. /s/ Krish Jonnalagadda SES Americom, Inc. Dated: June 20, 2011


Document Created: 2011-08-26 11:37:19
Document Modified: 2011-08-26 11:37:19
© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC