Attachment Mintz Levin conf req

This document pretains to SAT-MOD-20101118-00239 for Modification on a Satellite Space Stations filing.

IBFS_SATMOD2010111800239_920932

                                                                                        wahnees5     C
                                                                                701 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
MINTZ LEVIN                                                                                    202—434—7300
                                      .                                                            202—434—7400 fax
Russell H. Fox | 202 434 7483 | rfox@mintz.com                                                     www.mintz.com




                FOR PUBLIC INSPECTION —— CONFIDENTIAL DATA EXCLUDED

    August 22, 2011


    By HAND
                                                                                 RECEIVED — FCC
    Julius P. Knapp
    fanl                                                                              AUG 2 2 20
    Office of Engineering and Technology                                                  f           11
    Federal Communications Commission                                          Federal Communications Commission
                                                                                          Bureau / Office
    445 12th Street, S.W.
    Washington, DC 20554

    Re:     Request for Additional Information

    Dear Mr. Knapp:

    This responds, on behalf of our client Trimble Navigation Limited ("Trimble"), to your letter of
    August 10, 2011 to Messrs. Jeffrey Carlisle and Charles Trimble regarding the Final Report of
    the Working Group ("WG") that was formed to study the GPS overload/desensitization issue
    described in the International Bureau‘s Order of January 26, 2011." Your letter outlines
    additional information that you believe will help the Commission better evaluate receiver
    performance.

    First, because the results of the WG testing were reported anonymously in the Final Report, you
    asked for the device key code which identifies the receivers that were tested. It is our
    understanding that LightSquared Subsidiary, LLC ("LightSquared") provided you with that
    information by letter dated August 15, 2011. The remainder of your letter asks for additional
    information about the devices tested. As the letter to you from the U.S. GPS Council, dated
    August 18, 2011 noted, all participants in the WG were provided a copy of your letter and in a
    joint communications from Messrs. Carlisle and Trimble, participants were directed to provide
    any information directly to the FCC.

    We are providing you with two copies of this letter. The first, for which confidential treatment is
    requested, contains publicly available specifications about the Trimble products that were tested
    and, in an associated spreadsheet, marketing and other confidential information about those
    products that is not publicly available. The second version of this letter, which may be made
    publicly available, does not contain the associated spreadsheet.



    4       LightSquared Subsidiary LLC Requestfor Modification of its Authorityfor an Ancillary
    Terrestrial Component, Order and Authorization, 26 FCC Red 566 (2011) ("January 2011 Order").


                          Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.
      BOsTON | WASHINGTON | NEW YORK | STAMFORD | LOS ANGELES | PaLO ALTO | SAN DIEGO | LONDON | IsRAEL


Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.

Julius P. Knapp
August 22, 2011
Page 2



Trimble wishes to continue to cooperate with the Commission to provide it with a better
understanding of the WG test results. While Trimble is prepared to provide you with data
beyond what is attached, it wants to be certain that it presents the type of data that will be
valuable in your analysis. As a next step, we propose having Trimble engineering personnel
meet with your staff to provide a more complete understanding of GPS receiver technical
characteristics, performance issues and design trade—offs. We anticipate that after such a
meeting, we will be able to identify additional information that will be most useful for Trimble to
provide to you in your analysis of the WG data. Please let us know when such a meeting would
be convenient.

In the interim, Trimble requests that you withhold from public inspection and treat as
confidential, pursuant to Section 0.457(d)(2) and 0.459 of the rules, the attached
spreadsheet. In the event that this confidentiality request is denied, Trimble respectfully
respects notification and immediate return of this data in accordance with section 0.459 of
the Commission‘s rules.*‘

Exemption 4 of the Freedom of Information Act ("FOIA") permits parties to withhold from
public inspection "trade secrets and commercial or financial information obtained from a person
and privileged or confidential categories of materials not routinely available for public
inspection.""‘ Commercial or financial information is confidential under FOIA if its disclosure
will cause substantial harm to the competitive position of the person from whom the information
was obtained."" Disclosure of the commercially sensitive information contained in the attached
spreadsheet is not routinely made available for public inspection and its disclosure would cause
substantial competitive injury if disclosed. Consequently, this data should be withheld from
disclosure under FOIA Exemption 4.

In particular, all of the information contained in the spreadsheet is proprietary to Trimble. This
information is sensitive proprietary information, containing commercial information about
Trimble‘s products. The data reveals information about Trimble‘s competitive strategies and the
technical components of Trimble‘s products. Such information constitute trade secrets and
would be useful to competitors in the highly competitive GPS receiver marketplace by providing
them with insight into Trimble‘s marketing and technical information and therefore would cause
substantial harm to Trimble if released to the public. This information is held confidential by all
Trimble employees and is never made available to the public by Trimble. The potential
economic and competitive harm to Trimble if the data is released would be substantial, and the
need for confidential treatment of this information outweighs any need for public disclosure at


*   47 C.F.R. § 0.459(e).
Y   5 U.S.C. § 552(b)(4).
4   See National Parks and Conservation Association v. Morton, 498 F.2d 765, 770 (D.C. Cir. 1974);
Critical Mass Energy Project v. NRC, 975 F.2d 871, $79—90 (D.C. Cir. 1992).


Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.

Julius P. Knapp
August 22, 2011
Page 3


this time. Therefore, the information should be withheld from public disclosure for an indefinite
period.

We look forward to hearing from you regarding our offer to provide your staff with additional
information about GPS receivers in general. In any case, if you have any questions, please let us
know.

Very truly yours,


Puu¥t~h
Russell H. Fox

Attachments



Document Created: 2011-10-11 14:05:08
Document Modified: 2011-10-11 14:05:08

© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC