Attachment SES-DA 10-1259 rel J

SES-DA 10-1259 rel J

DECISION submitted by IB,FCC

a

2010-07-02

This document pretains to SAT-MOD-20100525-00110 for Modification on a Satellite Space Stations filing.

IBFS_SATMOD2010052500110_827962

                               Federal Communications Commission
                                         Washington, D.C. 20554




                                                                                                   DA 10—1259
                                                 July 2, 2010
Mr. Daniel C. H. Mah
Vice President, Regulatory Affairs
SES Americom, Inc.
2001 L Street, NW.
Suite 800
Washington, DC 20036


         Re:      SES Americom, Inc., IBFS File No. SAT—MOD—20100525—00110 (Call Sign:
                  $2156)

Dear Mr. Mah:

This letter returns, as unacceptable for filing, the application of SES Americom, Inc. (SES
Americom) that seeks to modify the authorization of the in—orbit, Ku—band AMC—5 space station
(Call Sign $2156). In its modification application, SES Americom seeks to change the
authorized location of AMC—5 from the 78.95° W.L. orbital location to the 79.05° W.L. orbital
location and to operate, if necessary, at the new location using the 11.7—12.2 GHz (space—to—
Earth) and 14.0—14.5GHz (Earth—to—space) frequency bands. We find that SES Americom did
not disclose, as part of its application, the orbital debris mitigation plans for the AMC—5 space
station, as required by Section 25.114 of the Commussion‘s rules.‘

Section 25.112(a) of the Commussion‘s rules provides that the Commussion will return an
application as unacceptable for filing if the application is defective with respect to completeness
of answers or informational showings, is internally inconsistent, or does not substantially comply
with the Commission‘s rules unless a waiver of the rules is requested."

The Commission‘s orbital debris mitigation disclosure rules became effective on October 19,
2005." An orbital debris mitigation plan must include a narrative statement that addresses four
elements of orbital debris mitigation: (1) spacecraft hardware design; (2) minimizing accidental


147 C.F.R. § 25.114(d)(14).

47 CFR. § 25.112(a). In the First Space Station Reform Order, the Commission affirmed the policies embodied
in this rule by continuing to require applications to be substantially complete when filed. See Amendment of the
Commission‘s Space Station Licensing Rules and Policies, First Report and Order and Further Notice ofProposed
Rulemaking, 1B Docket No. 02—34, 18 FCC Red 10760, 10852 (2003).
*‘ See 70 Fed. Reg. 59,276 (October 12, 2005).


                                   Federal Communications Commission                                  DA 10—1259


elements of orbital debris mitigation: (1) spacecraft hardware design; (2) minimizing accidental
explosions; (3) safe flight profiles; and (4) post—mission disposal. The statement must identify
particular methods by which a satellite system will mitigate orbital debris, rather than presenting
a generalized commitment to address orbital debris mitigation at a future date or a catalogue of
potential options. If an applicant‘s orbital debris mitigation plans change after authorization, the
changes must be submitted to the Commussion by means of a request to modify the
authorization.* Applications filed after October 19, 2005, that required submission of Section
25.114 information must include an orbital mitigation disclosure as part of the application."

In its modification request, SES Americom does not provide an orbital debris mitigation
disclosure, but states that it "incorporates by reference the technical information previously
provided in support of AMC—5."° Prior applications for authorization of AMC—5, did not
disclose orbital debris mitigation plans as part of the applications.‘ As a result, the Commission
lacks sufficient information on which to make a public interest determination regarding the
orbital debris mitigation plans for the AMC—5 space station.©

Accordingly, pursuant to Section 25.112(a)(1) of the Commussion‘s rules, 47 C.F.R. §
25.112(a)(1) and Section 0.261 of the Commission‘s rules on delegated authority, 47 C.F.R. §
0.261, we return SES Americom‘s application as unacceptable for filing without prejudice to
refiling."

                                                                 Sincerely,

                                                               //L‘/’#W"mc
                                                                     ze



                                                                Robert G. Nelson
                                                                Chief, Satellite Division
                                                                International Bureau

co:      Karis A. Hastings, Esq.
         Hogan Lovells US LLP
         555 Thirteenth Street, N.W.
         Washington, DC 20004


* Federal Communications Commission International Bureau Satellite Division Information, Public Notice, Report
No. SPB—112, DA 05—2698 (Oct. 13, 2005).

° Id.

° See Application ofSES Americom For Modification ofAMC—5 Fixed—Satellite Space Station License (May 25,
2010)(SAT—MOD—20100525—00110).

‘ See, eg., SAT—MOD—19980113—00002 and SAT—MOD—20050609—00117.

® We note that all prior modification applications for the AMC—5 space station were granted prior to the October 19,
2005, effective date of the orbital debris mitigation disclosure requirement.

° If SES Americom refiles an application identical to the one dismissed, with the exception of supplying the
corrected information, it need not pay an application fee. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1111(d).



Document Created: 2019-04-15 12:01:43
Document Modified: 2019-04-15 12:01:43

© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC