Attachment petition

petition

PETITION submitted by PanAmSat

petition

2009-05-20

This document pretains to SAT-MOD-20090520-00075 for Modification on a Satellite Space Stations filing.

IBFS_SATMOD2009052000075_725324

                                   Before the
                      FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
                                    Washington, D.C. 20554


                                                                         KA 2
In the Matter of
                                                                                           Oommisson
                                                                  Federal Communications
PanAmSat Licensee Corp.                                                  Office of the Secretary

Petition for Specific Authority Under Section
25.161(c) For C— and Ku—band Frequencies at
the Nominal 77° W.L. Orbital Location



         PETITION FOR SPECIFIC AUTHORITY UNDER SECTION 25.161(C)


       PanAmSat Licensee Corp. ("PanAmSat"), by its attorneys and pursuant to Section

25.161(c) of the rules of the Federal Communications Commission ("FCC or Commission"),‘

herein requests authority to retain its license to the C— and Ku—band frequencies at the nominal

77° W.L. orbital location which, of necessity, will be vacant for a reasonable period of time

greater than 90 days. On April 21, 2009, a shorter than expected life span caused PanAmSat to

de—orbit the Galaxy 4R satellite (call sign $2377) from the 76.85° W.L. orbital location." Due to

multiple unforeseen circumstances affecting the combined PanAmSat and Intelsat North

America LLC ("Intelsat") satellite constellations," neither PanAmSat nor Intelsat is able to

deploy a satellite capable of providing C— and Ku—band service at the nominal 77° W.L. orbital



|      47 C.F.R. § 25.161(c).

2      See PanAmSat Licensee Corp. Request for Special Temporary Authority to De—Orbit the
Galaxy 4R Satellite, IBFS File No. SAT—STA—20090123—00008 (filed Jan. 23, 2009) (grant
stamped with conditions on Mar. 25, 2009); Letter from Susan H. Crandall, Intelsat Corporation,
to Marlene H. Dortch, FCC, Re: Galaxy 4R De—Orbit (filed Apr. 22, 2009) (notifying the
Commission that de—orbiting of the Galaxy 4R satellite was completed on April 21, 2009).

3     Intelsat North America LLC is a sister company to, and under common ownership with,
PanAmSat.


location until the relocation of the Galaxy 11 satellite (call sign $2253), currently expected to be

in the first quarter of 2011. As demonstrated below, however, continuing PanAmSat‘s license in

effect would serve the public interest and would not undermine the purpose of Section 25.161(c).

        Section 25.161(c) of the Commission‘s rules provides that a license will automatically

terminate upon "removal or modification of the facilities which renders the station not

operational for more than 90 days, unless specific authority is requested."" As permitted by the

rule, Intelsat herein requests specific authority to leave the 77° W.L. orbital location vacant until

the relocation of the Galaxy 11 satellite, currently expected to be in the first quarter of 2011.

Following the launch of the Intelsat New Dawn satellite (call sign $2751), PanAmSat‘s Galaxy

11 satellite (call sign $2253), which is currently operating at 32.80° E.L., will be available for

relocation to 77° W.L. By granting this Petition to accommodate unexpected health issues with

several PanAmSat satellites, the Commission will not cause a lapse in service, and will permit

PanAmSat a reasonable time to replace failed facilities."

       The temporary vacancy in the 77° W.L. C— and Ku—band orbital location was caused by

the earlier than normal de—orbit of the Galaxy 4R satellite. As described in PanAmSat‘s

application for Special Temporary Authority ("STA") to de—orbit, the Galaxy 4R satellite

experienced unanticipated health issues that shortened its expected useful life." As a result, the



4      47 C.F.R. § 25.161(c).

5      For the same reasons that grant of this petition is in the public interest, good cause exists
for granting the requested authority even under the Commission‘s waiver standards. See, eg.,
PanAmSat Licensee Corp., 17 FCC Red 10,483, 10,492 (€ 22) (Sat. Div. 2002) ("Generally, the
Commission may grant a waiver of its rules in a particular case if the relief requested would not
undermine the policy objective of the rule in question and would otherwise serve the public
interest.").

6     See PanAmSat Licensee Corp. Request for Special Temporary Authority to De—Orbit the
Galaxy 4R Satellite, IBFS File No. SAT—STA—20090123—00008 (filed Jan. 23, 2009).
                                                  bJ


satellite‘s nine yearlife span was significantly shorter than the expected fifteen or more years."

       Moreover, the de—orbiting of several other satellites, some unforeseen and others routine,

precludes PanAmSat and Intelsat from re—deploying another satellite to the nominal 77° W.L.

orbital location within 90 days from the date Galaxy 4R reached its end of life. PanAmSat‘s

original deployment plan provided for the relocation of the SBS—6 satellite (call sign $2707) to

the nominal 77° W.L. orbital location." However, on February 20, 2009, PanAmSat was

required to de—orbit SBS—6 due to technical health issues." Within the last two years, Intelsat and

PanAmSat have also de—orbited four other satellites, including the Intelsat 605 satellite which

briefly operated at the nominal 77° W.L. orbital location a few years ago."" The Intelsat 704

satellite (call sign $2397) is scheduled to be de—orbited in May 2009."‘

       Additionally, satellites that were replaced were not viable options to relocate to 77° W.L.,

again, due to unforeseen circumstances and the need to ensure service continuity. Specifically,

Galaxy 25, after being replaced by Galaxy 19, was redeployed in late 2008 to 93.1° W.L. in order

to ensure continuity of service at that location given the health concerns related to Galaxy 26,


7       See Amendment ofthe Comm‘ns Space Station Licensing Rules and Policies, Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking and First Report and Order, 17 FCC Red 3847, [ 143 (2000) ("The useful
Tives of most GSO satetiites today are tonger than the current 10—year satellite Heense term." ;.

8      See Modification of Authorization to Relocate SBS—6 from 80.90° W.L. to 76.85° W.L.,
IBFS File No. SAT—MOD—20081222—00236 (filed Dec. 22, 2008).

°      See PanAmSat Licensee Corp. Request for Special Temporary Authority to De—Orbit the
SBS—6 Satellite, IBFS File No. SAT—STA—20090210—00020 (filed Feb. 10, 2009).

10      Intelsat 605 (call sign $2394) was de—orbited in February 2009. Marisat (call sign KS35)
was de—orbited in October 2008. Galaxy 10R (call sign $2378) was de—orbited in June 2008.
Intelsat 6B (call sign $2359) was de—orbited in March 2008.

U       See Intelsat North America LLC, Request for Special Temporary Authority to De—Orbit
the Intelsat 704 Satellite, IBFS File No. SAT—STA—20090212—00021 (filed Feb. 12, 2009) (grant
stamped with conditions on May 13, 2009).
                                                 Lid


which had been operating at 93.0° W.L." Galaxy 26 was subsequently relocated to 50.75° E.L.

in orderto satisfy an urgent demand for capacity by a U.S. Government customer seeking to

ensure service continuity."

       During this same two—year time period, PanAmSat and Intelsat have made good faith

efforts to replenish their satellite fleet. Since July 2007, Intelsat and PanAmSat have launched

four satellites."" The companies also plan to launch six more within the next two yeazrs.15

However, in order to ensure continuity of service at other locations and taking into account the

ability to service 77° W.L. customers from 93.10° W.L., PanAmSat has determined that its

customers will be best served by allocating these launches to other locations. Indeed, all

customers that received services on Galaxy 4R prior to its de—orbit were transferred successfully

to Galaxy 25 at 93.10° W.L. or to Horizons 2 at 74° W.L. Thus, no lapse in service will arise




12     iSee Intelsat North America LLC, Application to Modify Authorization to Relocate
Galaxy 25 to 93.10° W.L., IBFS File No. SAT—MOD—20080825—00159 (filed Aug. 25, 2008);
Policy Branch Information; Actions Taken, Report No. SAT—00566, File No. SAT—MOD—
20080825—00159 (Nov. 21, 2008) (Public Notice).

3       See Intelsat North America LLC, Request for SpeC1a1 Temporary Authority to Operate
Galaxy 26 at 50.:75° E—4L—, IBFS Frle No.: SAT=—ST A=200900303—000360—(fried—Mar—3—29009}—Ehis
application was granted on March 16, 2009. Policy Branch Information; Actions Taken, Report
No. SAT—00590, File No. SAT—STA—20090303—00030 (Mar. 20, 2009, effective Mar. 16, 2009)
(Public Notice). See also Intelsat North America LLC, Extension of Special Temporary
Authority to Operate Galaxy 26 at 50.75° E.L., IBFS File No. SAT—STA—20090505—00051 (filed
May 5, 2009); Intelsat North America LLC, Application to Modify Authorization to Relocate
Galaxy 26 to 50.75° E.L., IBFS File No. SAT—MOD—20090309—00034 (filed Mar. 9, 2009).

14      Galaxy 18 (call sign $2733) commenced service in June 2008. Horizons 2 (call sign
$2423 ) commenced service in February 2008. Intelsat 11 (call sign $2237) commenced service
in January 2008. Galaxy 17 (call sign $2715) commenced service in July 2007.

15      The satellites to be launched in the next two years are Intelsat 14 (call sign S$2785),
Intelsat 15 (call sign S2789), Intelsat 16 (call sign S$2750) and Intelsat New Dawn (call sign
$2751), plus Intelsat 17 and Intelsat 18, applications for which have not yet been filed.


from grant of this Petition."°

        Grant of this Petition conforms to Commussion precedent. The FCC has previously

granted authority under Section 25.161(c) and allowed a licensee to vacate an orbital location for

more than 90 days where—as here—the licensee demonstrated that no customers would be

adversely affected."" The Commission also has removed a continuity of service license

condition—which is designed to protect customers just like Section 25.161(c)—and allowed an

orbital location to remain vacant where the licensee needed to de—orbit a failing satellite.""

       Moreover, the proposed vacancy of two years is reasonable for satellite orbital locations.

Unlike earth stations licensed under Part 25 that typically can be purchased from manufacturers‘

shelves and installed within 90 days, replacing satellites takes much longer. Indeed, certain other

of the Commission‘s rules recognize this distinction. For example, the FCC‘s milestones afford

satellite operators approximatelyfive years to fill an orbital location whereas earth stations must

become operational within one year of license grant.‘" In this case, grant of this Petition will

ensure the restoration of facilities to the nominal 77° W.L. location years in advance of the date


16     See, e.g., VisionStar Inc., Application for Modification ofAuthority to Construct, Launch
and Operate a Ka—band Satellite Sys. in the Fixed Satellite Serv., Memorandum Opinion and
Order. 19 FEE Red14;820, 14825 {4 12 n—34) {(2004y

17      See SES Americom, Application for Modification of the AMC—16 Fixed—Satellite Serv.
Space Station to Temporarily Vacate the 85° W.L. Orbital Location andfor Telemetry, Tracking
and Control Operations during the Drift of the AMC—16 to andfrom the 118.75° W.L. Orbital
Location, Order and Authorization, 21 FCC Red 3430 (Int‘l Bur. 2006) (granting authority under
Section 25.161(c) to vacate the Ka—band frequencies at 85° W.L. for more than 90 days); SES
Americom, Application for Modification ofAMC—16 Fixed Satellite Space Station License,
Memorandum Opinion and Order, 21 FCC Red 14,785 (Int‘l Bu. 2006) (extending authority
under Section 25.161(c) to leave the Ka—band frequencies at 85° W.L. vacant).

18     See Skynet Satellite Corporation, Application for Modification of License Condition,
IBFS File No. SAT—MOD—20060306—00024 (grant stamp Dec. 11, 2007).

19     47 C.F.R. § § 25.164(a)(4) and 25.133(a)(1).


by which a newly licensed satellite could be constructed and launched. As a result, grant of this
                                                                                         nominal
Petition is the most expedient means of ensuring satellite service to customers from the

                                                                                     on to
77° W.L. orbital location. Indeed, PanAmSat is today withdrawing a pending applicati
                                                                                           to
place Galaxy 11 at a different orbital location" in order to confirm the company‘s newplan
                                                                                  t intends
redeploythe satellite to 77° W.L. upon the successful launch of New Dawn. PanAmSa

shortly to file a license modification application reflecting this planned redeployment.

        For the reasons set forth herein, PanAmSat respectfully requests that the Commission

                                                                                      rules.
grant this request for specific authority under Section 25.161(c) of the Commission‘s


                                                   Respectfully submitted,

                                                   PanAmSat Licensee Corp.



                                                   B y:    \;y\f“"i)if;g;t %fl%flfi

                                                          BertW . Rein
                                                          Jennifer D. Hindin
                                                          Wiley Rein LLP
                                                          1776 K Street NW
                                                          Washington, DC 20006
May 20, 2009                                              Its Attorneys




 20     See Application to Modify Authorization for Galaxy 11 to Provide C—band Satellite
 Service at $4.9° W.L.. IBFS File No. SAT—MOD—20080523—00113 (filed May 23, 2008).



Document Created: 2009-05-21 09:41:59
Document Modified: 2009-05-21 09:41:59

© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC