Attachment Reply

Reply

LETTER submitted by FCC

Reply

2009-01-09

This document pretains to SAT-MOD-20080813-00155 for Modification on a Satellite Space Stations filing.

IBFS_SATMOD2008081300155_687796

                                 Federal Communications Commission
                                        Washington, DC 20554
International Bureau
                                                  January 9, 2009




       James M. Talens
       Counsel for ATCONTACT Communications, LLC
       6017 Woodley Road
       McLean, VA 22101
                                                  Re:      ATCONTACT Communications, LLC
                                                          File No. SAT—MOD—20080813—00155
                                                          Call Sign $2346
       Dear Mr. Talens:

                This letteris in response to the above referenced modification application and
       ATCONTACT Communications LLC‘s (ATCONTACT‘s) request for an extension oftime to
       modify its authorization forits non—geostationary satellite orbit (NGSO) satellites specifying end—
       of—life operations.

                Section 25.114(d) of the Commission‘s rules require an applicant for a space station
       authorization to submit a description ofthe design and operationalstrategies that it will use to
       mitigate orbital debris, including a statement detailing post mission disposal plans for space
       stations at the end oftheir operating life.‘ Post—missiondisposal consists of measures taken at the
       end of a spacecraft‘s useful life that results in the removal of the spacecraft from the earth‘s orbit,
       or relocation ofthe spacecraft to a long term orbit that reduces the risk ofinterference with
       operational spacecraft." The mitigation of orbital debris serves the public interest by preserving
       the United States‘ continued affordable access to space, the continued provisionof reliable U.S.
       space—based services, and the continued safety of persons and property in space and on Earth.‘

               As indicated in its authorization for its highly—elliptical orbit (HEOQ) NGSO satellites,
       ATCONTACT planned to de—orbit the satellites through controlled re—entry." Because
       ATCONTACT‘s system was still in the design process, its application did not provide detailed
       information such as operational plans, methods for coordination with relevant government
       agencies, and insurance arrangements. Accordingly, ATCONTACT was directed to file a
       modification application providing detailed information concerning all aspects of the proposed
       disposal plan by May 30, 2008.

            On May 29, 2008, ATCONTACT filed a request for extension oftime." Inits request,
       ATCONTACT states there were a number of technical and procedural changes "in the process of

       47 C.FR.§25.114(d)(14).
       * Mitigation of Orbital Debris, Second Report and Order, 19 FCC Red 11567, 11591, $ 58 (2004) (Orbital
       Debris Order).
       * Orbital Debris Order, 19 FCC Red at 11567, 51.
       * contactMEO Communications, LLC, Order and Authorization, 21 FCC Red 4035, 4052, «46 (Int‘l Bur.
       2006). In June 2006, contactMEO Communications, LLCnotified the Commission ofits name change to
       ATCONTACT Communications, LLC. Letter to Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary, FCC, from James M.
       Talens, Counsel for ATCONTACT Communications, LLC (June 5, 2006).
       * Letter to Robert Nelson, Chief, Satellite Division, from James Talens, Counsel for ATCONTACT
       Communications, LLC (May 29, 2008) (4TCONTACT Extension Request),


development ... each of which will directlyor indirectly affect the fashion by which end—of—life
operations are implemented."" ATCONTACT concluded thatit was "not technically feasible at
this time" to submit the details required for the modification application as directed in its license."
ATCONTACT requested an additional six months to provide a detailed disposal plan, but
indicated it may be necessary to seek a further extension."

          In August 2008, however, ATCONTACT filed a modification application specifying the
end—of—life disposal plan for its HEO satellites." In the application, ATCONTACT states thatit
intends to use a disposal orbit rather than controlled re—entry as previously specified."
ATCONTACT acknowledges that controlled atmospheric re—entry has been employed for end—of—
life operations for HEO satellites with perigee altitudes similar to ATCONTACT‘s satellites, and
states that if atmospheric re—entry is determined to be more appropriate, it could be implemented
later in the program.""    ATCONTACT indicates that atmospheric re—entry was not selected due to
"eoordination activities"required.""

         To assist the Commission in determining whether ATCONTACT‘s orbital debris
mitigation plan serves the public interest, ATCONTACT must provide greater detail concerning
the rational underlying the change ofits post—mission disposal plan from atmospheric re—entry to a
disposal orbit. ATCONTACT should specify the nature of the "coordination activities"identified
in its extension request. ATCONTACT should detail what, if any, burden is associated with such
activities that led ATCONTACT to change the end—of—life method for its HEO satellites. In
addition, please explain how the use of a disposal orbit serves the public interest, considering
ATCONTACT‘s statement that less fuel is required for atmospheric re—entry, and the fact that this
method will result in the permanent removal of debris from the orbit.

         To provide ATCONTACT adequate time to respond to this request, we defer action on
ATCONTACT‘s modification application and grant ATCONTACT‘s request for an extension of
time to respond to the condition in its authorization to file an amendment detailing its proposed
re—entry at end—of—life.

         Accordingly, ATCONTACT Communications, LLC must respond to the above questions
concerning its proposed orbital debris mitigation plan before April 30, 2009. Alternatively,
ATCONTACT may file an application to modify its authorization for its NGSO satellites to
include all aspects of the proposed atmospheric re—entry end—of—life operations as initially set
forth in its authorization. Failure to respond by April 30, 2009 may render the authorization null
and void.




* ATCONTACT Extension Request.
" ATCONTACT Extension Request.
* ATCONTACT Extension Request.
° ATCONTACT Communications, LLC, File No. SAT—MOD—20080813—00155 (4TCONTACT
Modification).
" 4TCONTACTModification, Attachmentat 1.
" ATCONTACT Modification, Attachment at 1.
" 4TCONTACT Modification, Attachment at 1.


     This request is made without prejudice to any Commission action regarding
ATCONTACT‘s compliance with its milestone to commence physical construction ofits first
NGSO Ka—band satellite."
        Please contact Kal Krautkramer at (202) 418—1335 if you have any questions.


                                                         Sincerely,

                                                                £° &z
                                                        Robert G. Nelson
                                                         Chief, Satellite Division
                                                         International Bureau




cc: Mr. David M. Drucker
    Manager, ATCONTACT Communications, LLC




" Letter to Mariene H. Dortch, Secretary, FCC, from James M. Talens, Counsel for ATCONTACT
Communications, LLC (October 15, 2008).



Document Created: 2009-01-09 11:12:39
Document Modified: 2009-01-09 11:12:39

© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC