Attachment request

request

REQUEST submitted by AtContact

request

2008-10-15

This document pretains to SAT-MOD-20080813-00155 for Modification on a Satellite Space Stations filing.

IBFS_SATMOD2008081300155_674971

                                                   6017 Woodley Road
                                                   McLean, VA 22101
                                                   October 15, 2008

Marlene H. Dortch
Secretary                                                               FILED/ACCEPTED
Federal Communications Commission
The Portals, Room TW—A325                                                   OCt 15 2008
455 12"" Street, * S.W.                                                        munications   Commission
Washington, DC 20554                                                   mm%mmmmm

              REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT
               ROUTE DIRECTLY TO INTERNATIONAL BUREAU

Re: AtContact Communications, LLC‘s Demonstration of Compliance With the
Third Milestone for its Ka—Band FSS NGSO Satellite System; File Nos. SAT—MOD—
20060511—00056, SAT—MOD—20080813—00155 (NGSO) (Callsign $2346)

Dear Ms. Dortch:

                AtContact Communications, LLC ("AtContact"), by its counsel, hereby
requests that the identified portions of the documents submitted herewith demonstrating
compliance with the commencement of construction milestone ("Construction
Demonstration") contained in AtContact‘s Ka—band license‘ and required by Section
25.164(e) of the Commission‘s rules" and the Commission‘s First Space Station
Licensing Reform Order," be held in confidence and not made available for pubic
inspection, pursuant to Section 0.459 of the Commission‘s rules.* Confidential treatment
in this circumstance is fully consistent with the Administrative Procedure Act and past
Commission practice.

1       Order and Authorization, in the Matter ofcontactMEO Communications, LLC,
For Authority to Launch and Operate a Non—Geostationary Orbit Fixed—Satellite System
in the Ka—band Frequencies, 21 FCC Red 4035 (2006) at €68.

4         47 C.F.R. § 25.164(e) (requiring demonstration of commencement of
construction).

>      In the Matter ofAmendment ofthe Commission‘s Space Station Licensing Rules
and Policies; Mitigation of Orbital Debris, First Report and Order and Further Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking in IB Docket No. 02—34, and First Report and Order in IB Docket
No. 02—54, 18 FCC Red 10760 at €192 (2003) ("First Space Station Licensing Reform
Order") (requiring that a licensee demonstrate compliance with the commencement of
construction milestone).

4    47 C.F.R. § 0.459; see also First Space Station Licensing Reform Order, id.,
187.


                             FOR NTERNAL USE ONLY


                                     NON—PUBLIC


               AtContact has filed through IBFS a public redacted version of the
Construction Demonstration for the above—referenced NGSO satellite system.

               AtContact is submitting under cover of this request an unredacted copy of
the Construction Demonstration, with exhibits, between Space Systems/Loral ("Loral")
and AtContact and Northrop Grumman Corp. ("Northrop"). This showing covers the
NGSO component of the AtContact system, $2346. Space Systems/Loral remains the
prime contractor and the components listed in the Asset Sales Agreement will be
delivered as instructed by AtContact. Also, in furtherance of this request, only one copy
of this document is being filed with the Commission. The contents of the Construction
Demonstration and all the exhibits are considered redacted and the subject of this request.

                AtContact hereby requests that the contents of the Construction
Demonstration and all its exhibits be treated as confidential and not routinely available
for public inspection pursuant to 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.457 and 0.459, and 5 U.S.C. § 552(b)(4).
These components contain highly sensitive information that qualifies as "commercial,
financial, or technical information that "would customarily be guarded from competitors‘    >



regardless of whether or not such materials are protected from disclosure by a privilege.
See 47 C.F.R. § 0.457(d); see also Critical Mass Energy Project v. NRC, 975 F.2d 871,
879 (D.C. Cir. 1992) ("Critical Mass Energy") (concluding that financial or commercial
information provided to the Government voluntarily is "confidential" for purposes of
Exemption 4 of the Freedom of Information Act, which applies to information
constituting "trade secrets and commercial or financial information" that "would not
customarily be released to the public‘). Revealing the information in the Construction
Demonstration if disclosed could place AtContact, Loral and Northrop at a competitive
disadvantage.

               In support of this request and pursuant to 47 C.F.R. § 0.459(d) of the
Commission‘s rules, AtContact provides the following information:

               1. Specific Information For Which Confidential Treatment is Sought
                  — §0.459(b)(1): AtContact seeks confidential treatment for those parts
                  of the Construction Demonstration, including all exhibits, between it
                  and Loral that relate to specific technical characteristics, financial
                  terms, payment plans and construction schedules and similar matters.
                  As noted, AtContact has also filed a public version of the attached
                  materials, which reflects redaction of these parts of the Construction
                  Demonstration.

               2. Circumstances Giving Rise to the Submission — § 0.459(b)(2): The
                  information is being submitted pursuant to 47 C.F.R. § 25.164(c) to
                  demonstrate compliance with the Construction Demonstration
                  contained at paragraph 68 of AtContact‘s Ka—band license.


3. Degree to Which The Information is Commercial or Financial, or
   Contains a Trade Secret or is Privileged — § 0.459(b)(3): The
   Construction Demonstration materials for which AtContact requests
   confidential treatment contain sensitive commercial, financial and
   technical information that would customarily be kept from
   competitors. This information includes confidential terms associated
   with technical information and characteristics, and operational and
   financial details. AtContact would be severely prejudiced in its ability
   to compete were such information released to become available to a
   competitor. It could also adversely impact future negotiations between
   AtContact and Loral, as well as between Loral and their potential
   contractors or customers. Disclosure of these terms would therefore
   be damaging to both companies.

4. Degree to Which The Information Concerns a Service That is
   Subject to Competition — § 0.459(b)(4): The commercial provision
   of Ka—band FSS is relatively new in the industry, and there are
   numerous AtContact applicants and competitors who would stand to
   benefit competitively from any knowledge of the materials for which
   AtContact requests confidential treatment.

5. How Disclosure of The Information Could Result in Substantial
   Competitive Harm — § 0.459(5): Disclosure of the information for
   which confidentiality treatment is requested could result in substantial
   harm to AtContact, Northrop and Loral by revealing to their
   competitors the satellite construction industry and the public
   information that would be useful in negotiating contracts to develop
   competing service offerings. "Buyers receive a clear competitive
   advantage if they know the prices that other buyers have been charged
   as a result of individual negotiations." See In re Application ofMobile
   Communications Holdings, Inc. for Authority to Construct the
   ELLIPSO Elliptical Orbit Mobile Satellite System, 10 FCC Red 1547,
   1548 (Int‘l Bur. 1994). In addition, AtContact would be adversely
   affected in any future negotiations for satellite construction if this
   information were available to other satellite manufacturers.

6. Measures Taken by AtContact to Prevent Unauthorized
   Disclosure — § 0.459(b)(6): By the terms of the contract and through
   non—disclosure agreements, AtContact and Loral go to great lengths to
   prevent unauthorized persons from having access to the sensitive
   technical and financial information for which confidential treatment is
   requested.


               7. The Information Submitted is Not Available to the Public and Has
                  Not Previously Been Disclosed to Third Parties, Except for
                  Appropriately Limited Circumstances — § 0.459(b)(7): No part of
                  the materials for which confidential treatment is requested has been or
                  is available to the public or any third party without direct "need to
                  know" involvement.

               8. Period During Which the Submitted Material Should Not be
                  Available for Public Disclosure— § 0.459(b)(8): AtContact requests
                  that the materials for which confidential treatment have been requested
                   remain withheld from public disclosure indefinitely.

               9. Other Information Supporting Request for Confidential
                  Treatment — § 0.459(b)(9): Denying AtContact‘s request for
                  confidential treatment would impair the Commission‘s ability to obtain
                  voluntarily this kind of information in the future. The Commission has
                  long recognized the need for respecting confidentiality of certain
                  materials, as shown by its discussion in its First Space Station
                  Licensing Reform Order at paragraphs 186—87, by §§ 0.457 and 0.459
                  of its rules, and by its and U.S Court of Appeals decisions." These
                  policies and practices apply fully to the enclosed materials.


               For the foregoing reasons, AtContact asks that the Commission




°       See Examination ofCurrent Policy Concerning the Treatment of Confidential
Information Submitted to the Commission, 13 FCC Red 24816, 8 (1998) (declining to
disclose competitively sensitive contracts "on the mere chance" that such disclosure
might be helpful to a third party in some fashion). See also Critical Mass Energy, supra,
at 878 ("Where, however, the information is provided to the Government voluntarily, the
presumption is that [the Government‘s] interest will be threatened by disclosure as the
persons whose confidences have been betrayed will, in all likelihood, refuse further
cooperation.")


extend confidential treatment to the attached information as requested herein.

               Please contact me if you have any questions concerning this submission.




                                                     James M. Talens
                                                     703.241.1144
                                                     italens@verizon.net
                                                     Counselfor AtContact
                                                        Communications, LLC

David M. Drucker
Manager
AtContact Communications, LLC
2539 North Highway 67
Sedalia, CO 80135
303.688.5162

Enclosures



Document Created: 2008-10-24 14:50:32
Document Modified: 2008-10-24 14:50:32

© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC