Attachment letter

letter

LETTER

letter

2006-06-05

This document pretains to SAT-MOD-20060501-00052 for Modification on a Satellite Space Stations filing.

IBFS_SATMOD2006050100052_504787

C
pifisbu{y                                                  :      2300 N Street, N.W.           Tel   202.663.8000
7 3t                                                            Washington, D.C. 20037—1128    Fax   202.663.8007
Wlfith“}p                           .                              asnmgion                     w?w.giflsbu;ylaw.com

Shaw
Pittman.




       June 5, 2006           "                                                               David Konczal
                                                                                                202—663—8432
                                                                               david.konczal@pillsburylaw.com




       Via Hand Delivery
       Ms. Marlene H. Dortch
       Secretary
       Federal Communications Commission
       445 12th Street, S.W.
       Washington, D.C. 20554

              Re:     XM Radio Inc.
                      Application for Modification of Space Station License for XM—1
                      File No. SAT—MOD—20060501—00052

       Dear Ms. Dortch:

              On May 1, 2006, XM Radio‘Inc. ("XM") filed the above—captioned request to
       modify the license for its XM—1 satellite to specify operation at the 85.20°W.L. orbital
       location. See File No. SAT—MOD—20060501—00052. Page 2 of the Technical Appendix
       to this application, under the heading "Interference Analysis," incorrectly stated that a 0.2
       degree change in the orbital location of XM—1 from 85°W.L. to §5.20°W.L. would result
       in a worst—case interference increase of about 0.5 dB for a hypothetical satellite operating
       at 87.00°W.L. assuming the earth station antenna axis is repointed 0.2 degree west.
       Attached hereto is an amended paragraph which correctly states that the worst—case
       interference increase would be 1.1 dB, not 0.5 dB as previously indicated.

              Please contact the undersigned with any questions.

                                                     Very truly yours,


                                                 <[x _
                                                     David S. Konczal

       co:    Stephen Duall
              Shabnam Javid


     — Interference Analysis. Other than XM—3 at 85.10°W.L., there are no satellites using
either S—band or X—band frequencies within 2 degrees of the 85.20°W .L. orbital location.

        XM does not share S—band spectrum with other satellite systems, thus the precise location
of the satellite has no impact on interference among the systems.

      ~ In the X—band, the signal transmitted from XM‘s feeder link earth station site in
Washington, DC depends on the characteristics of that station‘s antenna. At worst, the gain roll—
off of that antenna is bounded by 29—25log(0). Assuming a hypothetical X—band satellite
operating at 87.00°W.L., a 0.20° change in the orbital location of XM—1 from 85°W .L. to

satellite operating at 87.00°W.L. assuming the earth station antenna axis is repointed 0.2 degree
west.


                                 Techaical Certification

        I, Jeffrey S. Snyder, Senior Vice President, Space Systems, of XM Radio Inc.,
certify under penalty of perjury that:

        I am the technically qualified person with overall responsibility for preparation of
the technical information contained in the foregoing. I am familiar with the requirements
ofPart 25 ofthe Commission‘s rules, and the information contained in the application is
true and correct to the best ofmy knowledge and belief.



                                                           y S./Snyder


Dated: June 5 2006



Document Created: 2006-06-09 12:01:23
Document Modified: 2006-06-09 12:01:23

© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC