Attachment surrender

surrender

SURRENDER OF AUTHORIZATION submitted by EchoStar

surrender

2007-10-01

This document pretains to SAT-MOD-20050617-00127 for Modification on a Satellite Space Stations filing.

IBFS_SATMOD2005061700127_598248

                                       STE P TO E &Jo H N s o N          LLP

                                            A T T O R N E Y S AT   LAW



Pantelis Michalopoulos                                                         1330 Connecticut Avenue, NW
202.429.6494                                                                    Washington, DC 20036-1795
pmichalo@steptoe.com                                                                     Tel 202.429.3000
                                                                                          Fax 202.429.3902
                                                                                               steptoe.com




October 1,2007                                  OCT   - I2007

Marlene H. Dortch
Secretary
Federal Communications Commission
445 12th Street S.W.
Washington, D.C. 20554

Re:     EchoStar Satellite Operating Corporation, File No. SAT-LOA-20031211-00350, SAT-
        MOD-20050930-00195, SAT-AMD-20051118-00249; Call Sign S2607

        EchoStar Satellite Operating Corporation, File No. SAT-LOA-20031215-00355,SAT-
        MOD-20041102-00206, SAT-MOD-20050617-00127;Call Sign S2609


Dear Ms. Dortch,

               EchoStar Satellite L.L.C. ("Echostar") hereby surrenders its above-referenced extended
Ku-band and hybrid extended Ku-/Ka-band authorizations at the 109" and 121" W.L. orbital locations.
This surrender is not related to, and does not affect, Echostar's separate authorization for a Ka-band
payload on EchoStar 9 at the 121" W.L. orbital location.' In addition, EchoStar respectfully requests
that the Commission grant an unconditional release of the performance bond submitted for each




         See Call Sign 2179; IBFS File Nos. SAT-LOA-19950929-00119, SAT-MOD-20000222-00062,
SAT-MOD-20010608-00055; SAT-AMD-20030127-00004, SAT-MOD-20060830-00092; see also
EchoStar Satellite Corp., 18 FCC Rcd 15862 (2003) (authorizing launch and operation of the hybrid Ku-
Ka-band EchoStar 9 satellite), as modified by EchoStar Satellite Operating Corp., 21 FCC Rcd 14780
(2006) (authorizing operation of the EchoStar 9 satellite on the lower Ka-band).




WASHINGTON               NEW Y O R K        PHOENIX           LOS   ANGELES    LONDON            BRUSSELS


                                                                                ST E P T O E &-Jo H N s o N    LLP




Marlene H. Dortch
October 1,2007
Page 2


authorization2and, to the extent required, a waiver in light of the Commission’s statement that such
bonds “will be payable if the licensee surrenders its license voluntarily before a milestone date.”3

                 EchoStar has decided to surrender these licenses at this time for legitimate and good
reasons. While EchoStar continues to need additional spectrum to keep up with the video offerings of
terrestrial rivals and to provide High Definition and local digital signals to its subscribers, the extended
Ku-band spectrum remains a compromised band for direct-to-home (“DTH”) services because of the
lack of interference protection. EchoStar had hoped to deploy receive-only earth stations in the band on
a non-protected, non-harmful interference basis, but recent regulatory developments have made that
prospect both more difficult and less economic. In particular, the Commission’s recent decision to allow
smaller antennas in the Fixed Service that shares this band will likely worsen the interference
environment into which EchoStar would have to deploy non-protected extended Ku-band ~ e r v i c e . ~
While EchoStar may revisit the possibility of deploying DTH service in this band in the future, it does
not wish to tie up Commission-managedorbital and spectrum resources in the face of such uncertainty.
The decision not to proceed at this time with the extended Ku-band payload at 121O W .L. also means
that it no longer makes economic sense to deploy a separate satellite to operate on just the lower Ka-
band at that location, especially when EchoStar has already been authorized to operate on 800 MHz of
the Ka-band in each direction using the EchoStar 9 satellite?


         Letter from Pantelis Michalopoulos, Counsel to EchoStar to Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary,
FCC,fiZed in SAT-LOA-20031211-00350 and SAT-LOA-20031215-00355 (Nov. 1,2004); Letter from
Pantelis Michalopoulos, Counsel to EchoStar to Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary, FCC,JiZed in SAT-LOA-
2003 1211-00350 (Sept. 21,2006); Letter from Pantelis Michalopoulos, Counsel to EchoStar to Marlene
H. Dortch, Secretary, FCC,JiZed in SAT-LOA-20031215-00355, SAT-MOD-20041102-00206, SAT-
MOD-20050617-00127 (Sept. 21, 2006); Letter from Pantelis Michalopoulos, Counsel to EchoStar to
Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary, FCC,fiZed in SAT-LOA-20031215-00355, SAT-MOD-20041102-00206,
SAT-MOD-20050617-00 127 (Jan. 5,2007); Letter from Pantelis Michalopoulos, Counsel to Echostar to
Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary, FCC,JiZed in SAT-LOA-20031211-00350, SAT-MOD-20050930-00195,
SAT-AMD-20051118-00249 (Mar. 2,2007).

        Amendment of Commission ’s Space Station Licensing Rules and Policies, First Report and
Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 18 FCC Rcd 10760, at T[ 171 (2003).

         See Amendment of Part IO1 of the Commission ’sRules to Modzfi Antenna Requirementsfor the
IO.7 - I I . 7 GHz Band, FCC 07-163, Report and Order, WT 07-54 (rel. Sep. 10,2007). Even though the
smaller antennas are not permitted to cause any more interference than existing Category A antennas,
the lower cost of the smaller small antennas is likely to lead to more extensive deployment and therefore
a worse interference environment for ubiquitously deployed receive-only antennas in the extended Ku-
band.

         See supra note 1.


                                                                               ST E P T O E &J O H N s o N   LLI'




Marlene H. Dortch
October 1,2007
Page 3


                The purpose of the bond is to deter speculation and warehousing of valuable spectrum
and orbital resources. This purpose would not be served by a forfeiture of the bond in the present case.
EchoStar has diligently complied with all prior milestones for the construction of the proposed satellite
under the Commission's rules and the conditions of its authorization.6 Thus, there has been no
speculation or warehousing in this case. For these reasons, the Commission should grant an
unconditional release of the performance bonds submitted for Echostar's extended Ku-band and hybrid
extended Ku-Ka-band satellite authorizations at 109" and 121O W.L., respectively, together with a
waiver to the extent required to permit such release.

               Please contact the undersigned if you have any questions regarding this letter.

                                                     Respectfully submitted,
                                                                        c
                                                                        *n
                                                                         ;
                                                     Pantelis Michalopoulos
                                                     Counselfor EchoStar Satellite Operating Corp.

cc:
Robert Nelson, International Bureau




       6
        See Public Notice DA 07-813 (rel. Feb. 23,2007) (confirming CDR completion for S2607);
Public Notice, DA 06-2520 (rel. Dec. 15,2006) (confirming CDR completion for S2609); Public Notice,
DA 06-1752 (rel. Sept. 1,2006) (confirming contract execution for S2607 and S2609).



Document Created: 2007-10-05 11:40:20
Document Modified: 2007-10-05 11:40:20

© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC