Attachment DA 06-121

DA 06-121

ORDER & AUTHORIZATION submitted by Globalstar

DA 06-121

2006-01-20

This document pretains to SAT-MOD-20050301-00054 for Modification on a Satellite Space Stations filing.

IBFS_SATMOD2005030100054_476851

                                  Federal Communications Commission                               naséar

                                             Before the
                                Federal Communications Commission
                                        Washington, D.C. 20554

 In the matter of                                     A
                                                      )
 Globalstar LLC                                       )
                                                      )
Request for authority to implement an ancillary ) File No. SAT—MOD—20050301—00054
terrestril component for the Globalstar Big LEO )
Mobile Satellite Service (MSS) system           )
(Call Sign ES2115)                              )


                                 ORDER AND AUTHORIZATION
Adopted: January 20, 2006                                                 Released: January 20, 2006
By the Chicf Intemational Bureau

                                         1.INTRODUCTION
        1.      In this order, we grant authority to Globalstar LLC ("GLLC") for operation of
ancillary terrestrial component (°ATC®) stations to provide services integrated with services
provided via the Globalstar?® Mobile Satellte Service (*MSS") system, using portions of the
spectrum bands assigned for Globalstar MSS operation.
                                          11. BACKGROUND

A. ATC Policyand Authorization Procedures
        2.      In 2003, the Commission adopted rules for Hicensing and operation of "ancillary
terrestrial components" or ATCs — £e., terrestrial base stations and mobile terminals licensed to
the operator of an MSS system for provision of radio communication services offered together
with MSS services, re—using frequencies previously assigned for the licensee‘s MSS operations."
The Commission concluded that authorizing such ATC operation would serve the public interest
by facilitating increased network capacity, more efficient use of spectrum, extension of coverage
for handset operation to places where MSS operators have previously been unable to offer
reliable service, improved emergency communications, enhanced competition, and economics of

‘ Flesblitfor Delivery of Communications by Mobile Setelite Service Providers in the 2 GHs Band, theL—Bond,
and the 162.4 GHiz Bands; Review oftheSpecirum Shoring Plan Among Non—Geostatinary Setelite OrkiMobile
SerelteService Systems in the 1.62.4 GHz Bands, Report and Order and Noticeof Proposed Rulemaking, FCC 03—
15, 18 ECC Red 1962 (2003) (‘A7C Repor: and Order®), modifed by Order on Reconsideation, 18 FCC Red
13590 (2002), reconsidered in part in Mem. Opinion and Order and Second Order on Reconsidertion, FCC 0.30,
20 FCC Red 4616 (2008) (ATC SecondReconsideration Order®)furter reconsidertion pending.


                                   Federal Communications Commission                               pa céin

 scale in handset manufacture that would be passed on to consumers. An MSS operator with an
 FCC—issued space—station license may request blanket authority for operation of ATC stations in
 the United States in an application for license modification." Equipment authorization must also
 be obtained for ATC mobile terminals pursuant to the test—based certification procedure specified
 in Part 2, Subpart J of the Commission‘s rules before the terminals are offered or imported for
 sale or lease in the United States."
         3.      In the A7C Report and Order, the Commission adopted rules establishing several
 prerequisites, or "gating criteia" that MSS operators must meet in order to be allowed to offer
 ATC. These gating criteria are set forth in Section 25.149 of the Commission‘s rules. To ensure
 that ATC will be ancillary to provision of MSS, the Commission adopted a requirement that
 MSS operators must provide substantial satellte service to be eligible for ATC authorization."
 The Commission defined substantial satellite service as the capability of providing continuous
satelite service over the entire geographic area of satellite coverage required in our rules,"
maintenance of spare satellites to expeditiously replace destroyed or degraded satellites," and
commercial availability of service throughout the mandatory coverage area. ° The Commission
also required the offer of MSS and ATC services to be integrated." An applicant for ATC
operating authority with an already—operational MSS system must demonstrate that it is in
compliance with the pertinent coverage, commercialservice availability, and. replacement—
sutellterequirements and will comply with the integration requirement."
B. Globalstar Big LEO MSS Operation
        4.    GLLC holds an FCC space—station license for the Globalstar "Big LEO® MSS
system,"" which provides service in the United States and abroad via non—geostationary—orbit


* ATC Report and Order ut ¥2, 20—15,and 210—11
* d at9240. An aubhorized provider of MSS n the United Sats viaa foreignicensed satelite can request blanket
authoriy forUATC operaton byapplying fr madifiation ofan FCC reservation ospectram or blanketlense
or mobile carth sttions.,/d.at $245, An individual, site—specifc Hcense mustbe obtained foany ATC bassation
that presens an aviationhazardissue or for which an Emvionmental Assssment must be prepared. 14 at $239; aso
see 47 CFR.§3 1.1307, 174, and 17.7.
447 CFR. § 25.149(6)0) and (2). Alsosee 47 CR §§2.803, 2901 ersep. and 2.1204,
* ATC Reportand Order§ 72
tarorgs 2s 1490)0)
Sn orns2s 10000
S ore s2s10900)
turor® 525 149090
" See 47 CFR § 25.1450) and Flexibliy for Delivery of Communications by Mobile Satelie Service Providers
in the 2 GHiz Band,the L—Band, and the 1424 GHiz ands; Review ofthe Spectrun Shoring Plan Among Non—
Geostattonary Stelite OrbiMobile SarelteServce Sistens n th 1.02.4 GHiz Rands, Order on Reconsideraton,
ECC 03—162, 18 FCC Red 13590 (2003)a yy10—11
" Sce Application of LoraliQualcomm Partnershp, LP. for Authority to Constract, Launch, and Operate
Globalsur, a Low Earth Orbis Sarelze System to Provide Moile Stelite Services in the 1610—16265
Altir2483 52500 Mis Bands, DA 95—128, 10 FCC Red 2333 (1999).. The tem "Big LEO MSS" denots MSS
systems that useassigned fequencis in the 1610—1626.5 MiHz band for transmissionfrom mobile carth sations to
                                                      2


                                 Federal Communications Commission                             pasérn

satelltes, using the 1610—1621.35 MHz band for transmissions from mobile earth stations to
satelltes and the 2483.5—2500 MHz band for transmissions from satellites to mobile earth
stations, An affiiated company, Globalstar USA LLC, holds an FCC blanket license for
operation of Globalstar mobile earth—station terminals and is responsible for provision of
Globalstar MSS services to end users in the United States."
       5.      The Globalstar Big LEO MSS system has been in continuous commercial
operation in the United States for more than five years, providing voice and data services. GLLC
reports that at the end of 2004 there were 133,000 Globalstar Big LEO MSS subscribers
worldwide and that the customer base for Globalstar Big LEO MSS has grown at an average
annual rate of 45 percent since the system‘s frst year of operation.""
C. ATC Application
     1. System Description
        6.      In an application for license modification filed in March 2008, GLLC requests
blanket authority to operate an unlimited number of ATC base stations and dual—mode MSS/ATC
user terminals."" A functional description of the proposed Globalstar ATC system, as given in
the application, is set forth in the following paragraphs.
        7.     Mobile Terminals Globalstar ATC mobile terminals will be dual—mode devices
that can also be used for communication via the Globalstar Big LEO satellite system._In MSS
mode, the mobile terminals will operate in frequency bands assigned for Globalstar Big LEO
MSS, transmitting in the 1610—1621.35 MHz band and receiving in the 2483.5—2500 MHz band.
As required by Section 25.149(a)(2) of the Commission‘s rules," terminal operation in ATC
mode will be confined to 1610—1615.5_MHz for transmission and 2487.5—2493 MHz for
reception. Handheld Globalstar MSS/ATC terminals will be equipped with two antennas: a
small stub antenna with peak gain of approximately 2.0 dBi for ATC—mode operation and a larger
extemal antenna with peak gain of approximately 3.0 dBi for operation in MSS mode."*. An
accessory adapter might be supplied to enable the handset to draw power from a motor vehicle‘s
battery and use an outside antenna for MSS—mode operation to avoid signal attenuation through
the vehicle‘s roof." Globalstar also seeks authority for operation of fixed and vehicular dual—
mode terminals with larger antennas and more powerful transmitters."
        8.      Users of Globalstar MSS/ATC terminals will be able to select either ATC or MSS

sateites
"* see AirTouch SatellteServces US,Inc. Appliation for Blanket Authoriation to Construt and Operate up to
500000 Mobile Sarelite Earth Terminals Through the GLOBALSTAR Mobile Satlite System, Order and
Authorization, DA 99—2010, 14 FCC Red 17328 (1999)
5 application File No. SAT—MOD—20050301—00084 (*GLLC ATC Application) Extibi A at 1
ue
"arcrR p31900)
!* GLLC ATC Appleation, Exh B4 ar3.
2 Euh. Betar2.
" ul ana


                                Federal Communications Commission                       paséim

 as the preferred mode ofoperation on power—up. Tterminal flls to acquire a pilot signal in the
 preferred mode or subsequently loses the signal, it will automatically switch modes and attempt
 to register in the other mode:"". Once the device acquires the pilot signal and registers on the
 Globalstar MSS or ATC network, the user can place a call by entering a phone number and
pressing a "send" button. Calls will be routed through the public switched telephone network or
 the Interet according to the user‘s instructions. A single phone number will be assigned to each
terminal for both MSS and ATC operation.®" Globalstar will ensure that manufacturers of mobile
terminals capable of accessing its ATC network apply for prior certification of the devices, as
required by Rule Section 25.149(c), and that the devices operate in compliance with all other
pertinent requirements in the Commission rules.""
         9.      Base Stations Transmitting in the 2487.5—2493 MHz band and receiving in the
 1610—1615.5 MHz band, Globalstar ATC base stations will link with mobile terminals through
an access network that will allow the mobile terminals to register, be paged and initiate calls.
Each base station will be connected through interfaces to a mobile switching center and a packet
data serving node for Internet Protocol connections." GLLC plans to deploy fixed ATC base
stations in underserved geographic regions and where reception of the Globalstar satellite signal
is largely impaired by path obstruction, particularly in urban areas." GLLC also proposes to
deploy transportable ATC base stations in rural or underserved areas to meet the needs of
customers requiring service on a short—term or emergency basis."". GLLC promises that, as
required by Section 25.254(@)(3), it will perform whatever frequency coordination may be
neeessary to avoid causing interference to other systems operating on assigned frequencies in the
2450—2500 MHz band before placing any ATC base station in service, and that ts base stations
will operate in compliance with all other pertinent requirements in the Commission‘s rules.""
        10. Air Interface Protocol The Globalstar ATC system will use a edma2000 air
interface protocol, which will support voice communication and data services with speeds up to
two million bits per second."
        11. Seffnterference Management There are thiee ways in which the Globalstar Big
LEO MSS system and the Globalstar ATC system could interfere with: each. other.
Transmissions from Globalstar ATC base stations in the 2487.5—2493 MHz band could interfere
with reception of co—frequency Globalstar MSS signals in the base—stations‘ coverage areas."
Likewise, Globalstar MSS—terminal transmissions in the 1610—1615.5 MHz band could interfere
with reception of co—frequency Globalstar ATC transmissions at the base stations." Moreover,
7 ui, Exk B—l a 12.
3 10, ExB—dar3
24 pacd
" 14 Exk B3 arl.
* 14, Exk B3 ar2.
"m
"14, Exk Bar 1—4, Exh B3 ar2.
"n, i Baal.
" 10 Exk B mr2.
" 1i ExkB ard


                                    Federal Communications Commission                                  na oerr

 simultaneous operation of a large number of Globalstar ATC mobile terminals in an ATC service
 area could block satellite reception of MSS signals in one or more channels from Globalstar
 terminals anywhere within the footprintof a satellite reception beam encompassing that area.""
         12. In order to limit such selffinterference and maximize overall capacity, Globalstar
network control centers will dynamically allocate channel frequencies and power to satellites and
ATC base stations on a beam—by—beam, minute—by—minute basis, aking into account base station
locations, varying demand for each type of service, and satellite beam coverage and movement
over the earth‘s surface."" The control centers will assign at least one channel in the 2487.5—2493
MHz band and one in the 1610—1615.5 MHz band exclusively for MSS transmission in satellite
beams overlying Globalstar ATC service areas to ensure that Globalstar customers with MSS—
only terminals can be served in those areas. The control centers will also limit the number of
simultaneous transmissions from terminals in such overlying beams to facilitte shared use of the
remaining spectrum in those bands for both MSS and ATC." The impact of ATC terminal
operation on a satellite‘s reception of MSS uplink transmissions will be alleviated by recovery of
blocked channels by other Globalstar satellites with reception beams that overiap the affected
beams but do not extend over the areas where the interfering ATC signals originate."                        When
beams from two satellites overlap each other in a rural region and separately extend over two
different cities where Globalstar ATC service is provided, the control centers will allocate ATC
channels between the service areas to ensure that in the area where the beams overlap any MSS
uplink channels blocked in one beam will be available in the other."
        13. GLLC calculates that approximately 490 Globalstar ATC calls can be supported
in the amount of bandwidth required for one Globalstar MSS call, Hence, GLLC contends that
its proposed implementation of ATC will enhance spectrum efficiency, as the resultant ATC
capacity will be much greater than the MSS capacity lost due to self—interference.
        2. Service
         14.     GLLC asserts that by offering ATC services along with Globalstar satelite
services it can better serve existing customers and meet additional, unmet needs for integrated
sutellite—terrestrial services with one—number convenience that will be especially useful for
subscribers who travel in both urban and rural areas. GLLC intends to improve the quality and
availability of Globalstar services in urban areas by deploying ATC base stations where buildings
and other structures block line—ofsight signal paths to the Globalstar satellites. GLLC estimates
that a carefully designed Globalstar MSS/ATC system could support approximately 4 million

" 1e ts B—t ars.
* Each Globalsar stelite projects multiple downlink beams with separate fotprints on th cat‘s surfice and
Hikewise diffeentiates uplink recepionin an equal nuriber of discrere geopraphicareas that arealso losely refered
to as‘beams." ‘The deployment of muliple downlink beams and corresponding gcounaphic diffrentaionin the
reception of erminal tansmisions, which is typical of MSS srelite sytem, enables multiple re—use of spectrum
assigned fortransmisionbetween saelites and mobil erminals, hence multilying sytem capucity.
5 tk, Bub Bet at2 and 4.
"1e, Ext Bars
" GLLC ATC Applcation, ExhB1 at 3.


                                   Federa! Communications Commission                       pa ocz

 MSS/ATC subscribers in the ten most populous US cities plus Washington, D.C. GLLC
 contends that deployment of Globalstar ATC base stations and dual—mode MSS/ATC terminals
 that can be used anywhere in the United States will facilitate provision of improved services for
 public safety, law enforcement, and emergency—response organizations, particularly following
 catastrophes that disrupt operation of local telecommunications infrastructure.
          15.     GLLC plans to deploy transportable ATC base stations that can be set up quickly
 and put into use at relatively low cost to provide telecommunications services to customers in
 rural and remote areas that are currently unserved or underserved by wireline and wireless
 telecommunications providers.. Globalstar MSS/ATC customers in such areas would be able to
 communicate locally via the Globalstar ATC base station and with the rest ofthe world using the
 satellite component of their dual—mode terminals. GLLC adds that such transportable base
 stations could also be used to meet short—term needs for public—safety, military, and other security
 communications in areas with no pre—existing communications infrastructure or where existing
 infrastructure is unreliable or temporarily disabled.
          16. GLLC contends that it is the only MSS operator capable ofintegrating ATC with
an existing, first—generation MSS system in full compliance with the Commission‘s ATC rules
and asserts that it can rapidlytake advantage of the additional Nexibility that grant of its ATC
application would afford. GLLC points out that it has conducted demonstrations, under an
experimental license, with a suitase—sized transportable base station that enabled users with
dual—mode Globalsta/GSM phones to place intemational calls through the public switched
network.       GLLC maintains that these experiments prove that Globalstar MSS/ATC can be
implemented with existing technology at low cost.
     3. Compliance with Radiation Limits
         17.     As required by Section 25.149(a)(5), GLLC guarantees that Globalstar ATC base
stations and MSS/ATC terminals will operate in compliance with the provisions of the National
Environmental Policy Act incorporated in the Commission‘s rules, including the provisions in
Sections 1.1307(b), 1.1310, 2.1091, and 2.1093 pertaining to radio—frequency radiation exposure.
The base—station antennas will typically be mounted atop tall masts and will be enclosed by
perimeter security fences. Standard radiation—hazard wamings will be posted, and access to areas
directly in a base station‘s main antenna beam will be barred except as required for maintenance
by authorized engincering personnel after amplifier input signals have beenblocked. GLLC will
submit an analysis for each ATC base station before placing it in operation, demonstrating that
levels of radiation above the maximum allowable exposure level will not exist in areas normally
occupied by humans. Globalstar MSS/ATC terminals will be designed to comply with the
pertinent limits specified in OET Bulletin 65 for Specific Absorption Rates and Maximum
Permissible Exposure in uncontrolled environments. GLLC acknowledges that compliance with
radiation—hazard limits applicable to mobile—terminal operation must be veriied by testing and
that the test results and a description of the testing procedures must be submitted in an
application for equipment certification pursuant to Part 2, Subpart J of the Commission Rules."*

"* See 47 USC. §§2.1003(0) and (d) and 25.149(0).


                                   Federal Communications Com                                      paséan

    Related Filings
         18.     The Commission‘s International Bureau, Satellite Division placed the Globalstar
 ATC application on public notice"" and subsequently granted a request to designate the ensuing
proceeding as "permit—but—disclose" for purposes of the Commission‘s ex parte fules." The
Wireless Communications Association International, Inc. ("WCA") filed comments on the
application, and the Society of Broadcast Engineers ("SBE") filed an "Informal Objection."""
GLLC filed a consolidated opposition to those pleadings, and WCA and SBE filed separate
replies." Informal comments on the application were also received from an Associate
Administrator of the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (°NTIA") in
a leter that was placed in the record."" In other letters of record, GLLC certified that there had
been no material change of its ownership or control since last report® and Mobile Satellite
Ventures Subsidiary LLC (‘MSV") urged the Commission to include a clarifying statement
concerning MSS data—transmission rates in any grant of authority based on the current
application."" Finally, GLLC filed a response to the NTIA‘s comments on October 17, 2005."
IHI. DISCUSSION

    Protection of Radionavigation—Satellite Services
        19. Section 25.254(a)(4) of the Commission‘s rules prescribes the following limits on
the radiated power of out—ofband emissions in the 1559—1610 MHz band from ATC base
stations licensed to transmit on assigned frequencies in the 2483.5—2500 MHz band:
        [Such base stations} shall not generate EIRP density, averaged over any two—
        millisecond active transmission interval, greater than 70 dBW/MHz in the 1559—
        1610 MHz band, and) (t}he EIRP, averaged over any two millisecond active

"" Publi Notie, Report No. SAT—00264 (Apr 15, 2005)
"® Publc Notie, Report No. SAT—0306 (luly $ 2008)
* Comments of the Wireless Communications Association Intemationl, Inc. fied May: 16, 2005; Informal
Objection of the Sociy ofBroadcast Engineers, Inc. ied May 16, 2005
** Reply of Globalstar LLC and Gobalsar USA, LLC ied May 26, 2005; Response to Reply of Globalstar to the
Informal ObjectionoftheSociey oBroadcast Enginees, Ic. filedJly 11,2005; Reply Comment ofthe Wieless
Communications Association Intemational, nc. ied June $, 2005. lso eeletert the FCC Secretry dated Aug
18, 2005 from Josh L. Roland, Counsel to Globalstar LLC (ex parte noice) and leter to the FCC Secretary dated
Aug. 26, 2005 from PaulJ Snderbrand, Counselforthe WOA
"* Leter to Donald Abelson, Chief, Iterational Bureau, from Frederick R. Wentland, Associte Administatr,
Oific oSpectrum Management, dated May 25, 2008 (NTIA Lerer‘).
® Leterto the FCC Secretay from WitiamT. Lake, Counsel to Globalstar LLC and Globalstar USA LLC, dted
Sept 9,2005.
" Leter to the FCC Secretiry from Jennifer A. Manner, Vice Preident, Repulatory Affair, dted Sept. 29, 2008
(MSV Lener®)
°* Leter to the FCC Seeretry from JoshL. Roland, Counselto Globalsar LLC, dted Oct.17, 2008, with atached
lener rom GLLC‘s president
                                                     3


                                 Federal Communications Commission                      paséan

        transmission interval, of discrete out—of band emissions of less than 700 Hz
        bandwidth from such base stations shall not exceed —80 dBW in ... [that] band.
 Section 25.254(b)(4) prescribes similar limits for ATC mobile terminals licensed to transmit in
 assigned frequencies in the 1610—1626.5 MHz band
        [Such mobile terminals] shall not generate EIRP density, averaged over any two—
        millisecond active transmission interval, greater thn —70 dBW/MHz in the 1559—
        1605 MHz band or greater than a level determined by linear interpolation in the
        1605—1610 MHz band, from —70 dBW/MH at 1605 MHz to —10 dBW/MHz at
        1610 MHz.. The EIRP, averaged over any two—millisecond active transmission
        interval, of discrete out—offband emissions of less than 700 Hz bandwidth from
        such mobile terminals shall not exceed —80 dBW in the 1550—1605 MHz band or
        exceed a level determined by linear interpolation in the 1605—1610 MHz band,
        from —80 dBW at 1605 MHz to —20 dBW at 1610 MHz.             The EIRP density of
        carrier—offstate emissions from such mobile terminals shall not exceed —80
        dBW/MHz in the 1559—1610 MHz band, averaged over a two—millisccond
        interval

Section 25.216(c) prescribes emission limite for new mobile earth stations with assigned
transmission frequencies between 1610 MHz and 1660.5 MHz that are identical to the limits
specified in Section 25.254(b)(4).
        20. The Commission adopted these emission limits to prevent interference with
reception of signals from radionavigation satellites in the 1550—1610 MHz band. The U
Government‘s Global Positioning System ("GPS®) satelltes operate in this band, transmitting
radionavigation signals for general civilian use in a one—megahertz band centered on 1575.42
MHz and a coded signal primarily for military use in a ten—megshertz band also centered on the
1575.42 MHz carrier frequency.
       21. In comments filed in the ATC rulemaking proceeding, the NTIA advocated
adoption of strieter Radionavigation Satellite Service (‘RNSS®) band emission limits for ATC
base stations and mobile terminals than the Commission had previousty prescribed for MSS
terminals in Section 25.216 of the rules.. The Commission declined to adopt such stricter limits
for ATC transmitters in the ATC Report and Order because it did not find a suficient basis in the
record for doing so." In response to a petition for reconsideration, however, the Commission
said that it intended to discuss protection requirements for GPS with other Federal agencies
through participation in an interagency Executive Committee." The Commission noted that
MSV, the only MSS operator that had previously received authority for ATC operation, had
voluntarily agreed to meet stricter emission limits for its ATC transmitters consistent with the
NTIA‘s recommendations.® The Commission said that if it received more ATC applications
prior to final resolution of GPS protection issues it would ensure adequate protection for GPS

"*.4TC Report and Order t § 126,182,and 199.
* ATC Second Reconsideration Order ut 470.
® n en


                                  Federal Communications Commission                               va céim

 through ad hoe coordination with the NTIA.®
         22. GLLC stated in its ATC application that the proposed Globalstar ATC base
 stations would operate in compliance with the emission limits currently prescribed in Section
 25.254(a)(4) and that Globalstar MSS/ATC mobile terminals would operate in compliance with
 the limits currently prescribed in Sections 25.216(c) and 25.254(b)(4):"_In his letter of May 25,
2005, the NTIA‘s Associate Administrator for Spectrum Management recommended that ATC
mobile terminals be required to meet stricter limits on RNSS—band emissions than the
Commission‘s rules currently prescribe in view ofthe likelihood that ATC mobile terminals will
be deployed in great numbers and because of the development of GPS technologies for
processing low—level signals."       Specifically, the Associate Administrator recommended that any
grant of authority for Globalstar ATC operation be conditioned to require suppression of
emissions from ATC mobile terminals to —90 dBW/MHz or less in the 1559—1605 MHz band and
to levels in the 1605—1610 MHz band determined by linear interpolation from —90 dBW/MHz at
1605 MHz to 42 dBW/MHz at 1610 MHz." Alternatively, the Associate Administrator
recommended that the Commission withhold authority for operation of Globalstar ATC mobile
terminals pending the outcome of interagency discussions regarding interference protection for
GPS and resolution ofany ensuing rulemaking."
         23.     In lettersfiled on October 17 and December 27, 2005,"" GLLC reported thatit had
agreed in discussions with the NTIA to meet stricter ATC mobile—terminal emission limitsthan it
had originally proposed, notwithstanding that the originally—proposed limits were consistent with
the Commission‘s current rules. Specifically, GLLC said that Globalstar ATC mobile terminals
placed into service before 2012 would meet the following limits on RNSS—band emissions:
     Frequency                     ATC Mobile Terminal EIRP Spectral Density
       pitls                        aswnine                                 abwhdt
| 1605—1610                          —85 to 42                               —95 to 52
                       determined by linear interpolation determined by linear interpolation
  1600—1605                             —85                                     95


  1590—1600                         —90 to —85                              +100 to —95
                       determined by linear interpolation determined by linear interpolation
  15591500                           o                                  100

*n
© GLLC ATC Appleation, Exh B—6.
"NTIA Lererard
* 1t a6.
n m6
©" Letert the FOC Secretry from Josh L. Roland, Countel to Globalstr LLC, dated Oct. 17, 2008 wth atached
leter from Anthony J. Navara, President leterto the FCC Sccretary fom Josh L. Roland dated Dec.27,2005.
                                                      o


                                Federal Communications Commission                       paséin

 Further, GLLC represented that Globalstar ATC mobile terminals placed into service after 2012
 would meet the following limits:
      Frequency                 ATC Mobile Terminal EIRP Spectral Density
 |       00M                       abwiine                              abwhie
     Teos—to10                    35 to 47                           105 to 37           §
                       determined by linear interpolation determined by linear interpolation
     1550—1605                       s                                  105


         24.     As it appears that these proposed emission limits for Globalstar ATC mobile
terminals are acceptable both to GLLC and the NTIA, we conclude that it will serve the public
interest to incorporate them in the terms ofthe license granted here.
 B. Transportable Base Stations
         25. As noted above, GLLC plans to deploy transportable ATC base stations to provide
 local and long—distance telephone service to customers in remote and rural areas where access to
 wireline or wireless telephone service is currently limited or nonexistent.. The NTIA contends
 that this plan seems inconsistent with the ostensible purpose of ATC.. According to the NTIA,
 the Commission indicated in the ATC Report and Order that the only appropriate uses for ATC
 are to supplement MSS coverage in urban areas and inside buildings where the satellite signals
are blocked by structural attenuation.. The NTIA therefore recommends that the Commission
authorize deployment of transportable Globalstar base stations only for provision of service to
public—safety organizations.""
         26. The Commission found in the AZC Report and Orider that MSS operators could
greatly increase their capacity to serve customers in urban areas by re—using their assigned MSS
spectrum for provision of integrated ATC services, and the Commission identified this as one of
the principal potential public—interest benefis of permitting ATC operation." The Commission
did mot prohibit deployment of ATC base stations in rural areas. Rather, the Commission
assumed that ATC base stations will be installed in places where reception of MSS satellte
signals is substantially affected by blocking or where there is unmet consumer demand for more
communication capacity than an MSS operator could provide via satellite."" The latter — i.
deployment in geographic markets that cannot be adequately served with available MSS capacity
— is consistent with GLLC‘s proposal to deploy transportable ATC base stations to provide local
and long distance voice and data services "to a relatively high density of users" in rural and
remote areas "that are unserved or underserved. by cxisting. wireline. and wircless
SNTIA Leterat £6.
5 4TC Report and Order sy23.
* ATC Second Reconsideraion Order s ¥27.
                                                10


                                    Federal Communications Commission                               na ce

. telecommunications providers.". Accordingly, GLLC may deploy base stations in rural areas for
  cither public—safety or non—public—safety communications provided that it complies with the
  requirements for geographic and temporal coverage and all other pertinent gating requirements.
  C. Protection of Television Broadcast AuniliaryService
         27.   The Commission has issued no new licenses for terrestrial radio operation in the
  2483,5—2500 MHz band since 1985, but stations in the Television Broadcast Auxiliary Service
  ("BAS") still operate in that band under grandfathered licenses." Section 25.254(a)(3) of the
  Commission‘s rules, adopted in the ATC rulemaking, provides that an applicant for Hicense
  authority for ATC operation in the Big LEO MSS bands must give assurance that it will "take
  [any] steps necessary ... through frequency coordination" to avoid causing interference to other
  services operating on assigned frequencies in the 2450—2500 MHz band." In response to a
  contention that ATC base—station operation could not be successfully coordinated with operation
  of co—frequency BAS stations in the same locality, the Commission concluded in the ATC Second
  Reconsideration Order that parties with grandfathered BAS licenses are entiled to operate free
  from harmful interference from ATC operation and hence that an ATC licensee must cither
  coordinate base station operation in the 2483.5—2500 MHz band with BAS operation or resoive
  relevant interference issues in some other manner through negotiation with BAS licensees."" As
  required by Section 25.254(a)(3), GLLC declares in its ATC application that it will take any steps
  necessary to ensure through frequency coordination that ts ATC base stations do not harmfully
  interfere with BAS operation."
          28.     SBE asserts in its Informal Objection that BAS Channel A10, which includes the
  2487.5—2403 MHz band that GLLC requests for ATC base—station transmission, is used in most
  of the largest U.S. cities by mobile/itinerant TV Pickup stations that are frequently deployed for
  on—the—spot coverage of unscheduled news events. SBE contends that it is infeasible for GLLC
  to coordinate operation of ATC base stations to prevent interference with co—frequeney operation
  of such TV pickup stations in the same Tocality. Therefore, SBE maintains that the Commission
  should refrain from granting authority for operation of Globalstar ATC base stations in cities
  where grandfathered TV pickup stations operate on Channel A10, unless and until such BAS
  operation is relocated to a frequency band below 1486 MHz, as SBE has proposed in a petition
  for reconsideration of the Big LEO Spectrum Sharing Order.""

  * See ATC Report and Order, Appendix C3, $42.1. Other grindfithered incumbent in the 2483.5—2500 Mit band
  include suatins in the fied and mobile services that areTcensed under Part 90 (Private Land Mobile Radio
  Services)orPart 101 (Fixed Microwae Services). See 47 CFR. §2.106,Foomote NGM7
  "aror® grs2900).
  °7 ATC Second Reconsideration Order a 94.
  * Globalsur ATC Application, Exh. B at4
  * iformal Objection of the Socity of Broadcast Enginees, Inc. filed May 16, 2005 (*SBE Objection") at 4. See
 SBE Pertion for Reconsideation in IB Docket No. 02—364, filed Sept.8,2004,and eview ofheSpectrum Shoring
 Plan Among Nor—Geostaionary Satelite Orbit Mobile Sarelite Service Systens in the 1624 GHz Bards;
 Amendiment ofPrt2 ofthe Commisson‘s Rules o Alloate Spectrum Below 3 GHtfor Mobile and Fixed Service o
 Support the Imrodsction of New Advanced Wirless Services, Including Third Generation Wieless Systens, 1B
                                                      n


                                 Federal Communications Commission                             paséan

        29. WCA agrees with SBE that it is infeasible for GLLC to protect BAS operation in
Channel A10 through coordination. WCA therefore urges us t hold GLLC‘s ATC application in
abeyance until the Commission rules on SBE‘s proposal for relocating BAS Channel A10.® In
the altermative, WCA contends that if authority for Globalstar ATC operation is granted prior to
disposition of the relocation proposal the authorization should be conditioned on compliance
with any pertinent band—clearing obligation subsequently established by the Commission.
        30. In response, GLLC reaffirms that it intends to "perform any required frequeney
coordination ... to avoid causing interference from an ATC base station to other services sharing
the 2450—2500 MHz band" and will comply with any pertinent rule amendment adopted
hereafter." GLLC contends that the pendency of SBE‘s petition for reconsideration of the Big
LEO Spectrum Sharing Order does not warrant postponement of action on GLLC‘s ATC
application. GLLC notes, in this regard, that the International Bureau granted MSV‘s ATC
application while petitions for reconsideration of relevant ATC rules were pending, with a
proviso that the authorization would be subject to any further restriction adopted. on
reconsideration." GLLC maintains that withholding grant of its ATC application would disserve
the public interest by delaying provision of new services to customers whose needs are currently
unmet

        31.     The Commission clearly indicated in the A7C Second Reconsideration Order that
BAS licenseesare entiled to operate grandfathered stations in the 2483.5—2500 MHz band free
from harmful interference from co—frequency ATC base stations that the BAS licensees have not
agreed to accept.. Thus, it is the ATC operator, not BAS licensees, that bears the risk of any
difficulty of coordinating base—station operation in the 2487.5—2493 MHz band with BAS stations
operating in the same vicinity under a grandfathered license. Should it prove infeasible for
GLLC to protect grandfathered BAS operation in a given locality through coordination, then
GLLC will have to refrain from operating any base station in a way that would harmfully
interfere with such BAS operation, unless the resultant interference is permissible under the
terms of an agreement with the affected BAS Hicensee(s). We therefore agree with GLLC that
there is no need to withhold grant of its ATC application to avoid prejudice to terrestral
licensees. Accordingly, we deny the reliefthat SBE and WCA request

Docket No. 02:364, ET Docket No, 00—256, Fourth Report and Order and Further Notceof Proposed Rulemaking,
ECC 04—134, 19 FCC Red 13386 (2004) (*Big L0 Spectum Sharing Order®), recon perding. Also se Pettionof
Wireless Communcation Ass‘n mt for Reconsideration, IB Docket No.02—364, iled Sept.8, 2004.
" Comment ot Wireess Communications AssociationIternational,Inc. fled on May 19,2005, at 67. WCA,
which descrbes iselfas "the tride association of the wreless broadband industy," agrees with SBE that BAS
Chanel A1O should be relocted, primariy because WCA believes that BRS lensees cannot compatibly shar the
2496—2500 MJtz band with grandfithered BAS lcensees. [dat2.3,
5 Reply of Globalsta LLC and Globalstar USA, LLC fled May 26, 2008,at 3
© 1. at 4, itng Mobile Sorellte Ventures Subsidiary LC Application forMinor Modfication of Space Stzion
Licensefor AMSC—; Applicationfor Minor Modifcation ofBlanker Licensefor Authority to Operate Mobile Earth
Zerminas with MAT—1 (Order and Authorization}, DA 04—3553, 19 ECC Red 22144 (2004) (CMSYATC Order")
195.
© See ATC Second Reconsideration Order at 194 (RTC licensees may cither coordinte wth BAS licensees or
negotiate wth them for some othersohitionto potetial inerference problemn)
                                                   12


                                  Federal Communications Commission                               paséinm

 D. Protection of Other Grandfathered Services, Including the Public Safety Service

         32.     In addition to BAS stations, there are other fixed and mobile facilitieslicensed on
 a grandfathered basis in the upper portions of the 2.4 GHz band where their receivers could
 potentially receive overload interference from ATC base stations operating in the 2487.5—2493
 MHz band.5*.Although no comment was filed in this proceeding conceming protection of these
 other grandfathered operations, we remind GLLC that it must, prior to commencing base—station
 operation, take such steps as may be necessary to prevent adjacent—channel and brute—force
 overload interference to any fixed or mobile facilities operating in the 2450—2500 MHz band
 under grandfathered licenses identifed in the FCC‘s Universal Licensing System.°"
 E. Performance Parameters for MSS—Mode Operation
        33.    As mentioned previously, GLLC proposes to deliver ATC services via dual—mode
user terminals that can also be used for MSS communication via the Globalstar satellte system.
Although GLLC‘s application includes specifications for maximum radiated power and antenna
gain for terminal operation in MSS mode, the application states that because the terminal design
was not fully developed at the time of fling the specified values merely represent expected
performance."* Noting this, MSV observes thatterminal performance in MSS mode could have a
material bearing on compliance with the Commission‘s requirement that provision of ATC
services be integrated with provision of MSS, as the Bureau recognized when granting MSV‘s
ATC authorization."        MSV therefore contends that an order granting GLLC‘s ATC application
should stipulate that GLLC may not provide ATC service via user terminals with MSS—mode
performance parameters different from those specified in the application without obtaining prior
approval from the Commission. MSV also contends that GLLC would have to obtain prior
approval before providing service via MSS/ATC terminals with a lower average MSS data—
transmission rate than 2.4 kbps, which was specified in link budgets in the application for the
Globalstar Big LEO MSS space—station license."
        34. The authority granted here does not sanction operation ofterminals with MSS—
mode performance parameters inconsistent with those specified in the application before us or
with other relevant parameters incorporated by reference in the Globalstar Big LEO MSS
Hicenses by the terms of the authorization orders." GLLC may subsequently request authority for
"* 4C Report and Order ay203
® See 47 CFR. § 25.254()() and ATC Report and Order at 203. GLLC ha           chnowledged this obligation in
general terms, GLLC ATC Appliation, ExhB at4; Reply of Globalstar LLC Giobalsar USA, LLC ied May
26, 2005, t 3 (confmning intertion to "perform any requzed feguency coordiation o avoid causing harmful
interference rom an ATC base sation o other servies sharingthe2450—2500 MJz band‘",
" GLLC ATC Appleation, Exh B—4 at1
© SV Lenerat 1. See S ATC Ondea9 28—33.
©* Application of LorlQualcomm Parnership,LP. for Authorty to Consirct, Launch, and Operare Globalsur, File
No.SAT—AMD—19941116—00077 (Nov. 15, 1999), Tables 4—2t 45.
" See Appliction of LoraliQualcomm Parmership, LP. for Authoriy to Construct, Launch, and Operaie
Globalsur, a LowEarth Orbir Sarelte System to Provide Mobile Satelite Services in the 1610—10263
Aftir2483 52500 Mis Bands, DA 95—128, 10 FCC Red 2333 (1998) at 425, and AirTouch Sarlite Sevices US,
                                               13


                                  Federal Communications Commission                            pacéan

 operation with such variant specifiations by fling an application for modification oflcense.
 F. In—Orbit Spare
         35. Section 25.149(b)2)G)of the Commission‘s rules provides that "[oJperational
NGSO [%e., non—geostationary—orbit} MSS ATC systems shall maintain an in—orbit spare
satelite." The space—segment license for the Globalstar Big LEO MSS system authorizes
operation of forty NGSO space stations. GLLC stated in its ATC application that the Globalstar
Big LEO constellation "consists of 40 operational satellites, of which 4 are temporarily out of
service while recovering from [technical) anomalies ... plus two in—plane spares that are
currently operational" and added that cight more Globalstar Big LEO satellites were in ground
storage." In an annual report filed in October 2005, GLLC disclosed that one of the operational
Globalstar Big LEO satellites failed in August 2005 and could not be repaired and that several
more of the Globalstar satellites currently in orbit were temporarily out of service while
undergoing diagnostic and recovery procedures." In a Tetter filed more recently, GLLC
acknowledged that it does not currently have an in—orbit spare but said that
        it is likely that satellites temporarily out of service will be recovered prior to the
       planned initition of ATC service during the latter part of 2006. Furthermore,
        Globalstar will launch at least four, and perhaps all eight, of its ground spares
       beginning in the first or second quarter of 2007, at which time it expects to have
       multiple in—orbit spares once again."
                         25.149(b) requires an applicant for ATC authority to "demonstrate ..
                         that it "does or will comply" with the pertinent spare—satellite rule."
GLLC has satisfied this requirement by indicating in its application and in the subsequent letter
on point that it does not intend to commence ATC operation before a serviceable in—orbit spare is
available for the Globalstar Big LEO MSS system." In the event that GLLC fails to achieve
compliance with the in—orbit—spare requirement prior to the planned insuguration ofATC service,
it will have to postpone commencement of ATC operation pending compliance or disposition of
a further waiver request.
G. Protection of Radio Astronomy
       37. ATC operators are subject to technical and procedural requirements prescribed in
Sections 1.924 and 25.203(e)—(g) of the Commission‘s rules for interference protection for FCC
Inc. Application for Blanket Auhorization to Construct and Operate up to $00,000 Mobile Serelte Barth
Terminals Tirough the GLOBALSTAR Mobile Sutelite System (Order and Auorization), DA 99—2010, 14 FCC
rea 1722 (1999)ar oc
" GLLC ATC Appliation, Exh B at2
"‘ Globalsar LLC Annual MSS Reportfor52115 (Ot. 17, 2005
"* Letter t the FCC Secretry dated Dec.13, 2008 from Willam F. Adler, Vice PresidentLegal & Repultory
Affiis. GLLC condionally requests an interim waiver, in the event we construe the NGS0—i—orbi—spore uleto
require that an in—orbitspare be available atth time when an ATC authorization is gramted.
? See 47 CFR$25.1490).
"* Accortingly, we neednot address GlobslStr‘s equestfor waiver ofSection 25,149(b)2)().
                                                    14


                                Federal Communications Commission                       naséan

 monitoring stations and radio—astronomy observation at sites in West Virginia, Colorado, and
 Puerto Rico. GLLC declares that it will comply with these requirements."
       38.    Section 25.213 of the rules prescribes technical requirements for operation of Big
 LEO mobile earth stations designed to protect radio astronomy observation in the 1610.6—1613.8
 MHz band.. Byincorporation in Section 25.254(b)(1), these requirements also apply to operation
 of ATC mobile terminals that transmit on assigned frequencies in the 1610—1626.5 MHz band.
 GLLC declares that"[{he Globalstar [MSS—JATC system" will operate in compliance with these
 requirements.
        39.     GLLC explains in the application that the Globalstar Big LEO System determines
 the location of Globalstar MSS terminals and controls channel assignments to terminals
 operating in the vicinity of protected radio astronomy sites so as to ensure compliance with
 Section 25.213."* GLLC asserts that terminal location information obtained when ATC calls are
 initiated will similarly be used to avoid assigning ATC channels in the 1610.6—1613.8 MHz band
 to terminals within 100 km from the radio astronomy sites lited in Section 25.213(a)(1)G), or 30
km from the sites listed in Section 25.213(@)(1)(i), during. scheduled. radio astronomy
observation in that band. Section 25.213(2)(1) precludes transmission in the 1610.6—1613.8 MHz
band, however, when mobile terminals are within 160 km of the sites listed in subparagraph () or
50 km of the sites listed in subparegraph (i). The distances that GLLC specifies pertain, rather,
to terminal. transmission in the adjacent 1613.8—1615.8 MHz band. GLLC‘s apporently
inadvertent mis—specification of the distances does not override the rule‘s requirements and will
not excuse non—compliance.
         40. GLCC reports that there is a binding coordination agreement in effect with the
National Science Foundation pertaining to transmission by Globalstar mobile earth stations in
aireraft.". The Agreement specifies power flux density limits, separation distances as a function
of aireraft altitude, and limits on out—ofband emissions for protection of scheduled radio
astronomy observation in the 1610.6—1613.8 MHz band atsites listed in Sections 25.213(@)(1)G)
and 25.213(a)(1)(i).. We construe GLLC‘s inclusion ofthis information in the ATC application
to mean that any Globalstar ATC terminals in aireraft will operate in conformance with the
requirements that the agreement specifies for operation of mobile earth stations aboard aireraf.




"* GLLC ATC Appleation, Exh B at3, Exh .$ at2
* n Exi Bs ar 1
7 i Exh B—Sar2
                                                is


                                  Federal Communi         ons Commission                           Da d1



 H. 911 Service
         41.     Globalstar proposes to provide CMRS services with its ATC base stations."*
 Accordingly, Globalstar‘s proposed ATC service is required by this Order and Authorization to
 meet the 911 requirements specified in Section 20.18 of the Commission‘s Rules."" The satellite
 component of Globalstar‘s integrated MSS/ATC service offering is subject to Section 25.284 of
 the Commission‘s Rules, requiring emergency call center service.""

                                         Iv.     CONCLUSION
       42.     Based on review of the appliation and other documents of record, we find,
subject to the reservation in Paragraph 36, above, that GLLC has made a satisfactory initial
showing of compliance with the Commission‘s pertinent gating requirements,"" that GLLC is
qualified to hold the requested authorization, and that grant of its application, subject to the
conditions specified herein,will serve the public interest, convenience, and necessity.

                                    ¥.      ORDERING CLAUSES

        43. Accordingly, pursuant to Section 309 of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. §
309; and Section 0.261 of the Commission‘s rules, 47 C.FR. §.0.261, IT 18 ORDERED that
Application File No. SAT—MOD—20050301—00054 1S GRANTED and GLLC IS AUTHORIZED
to operate ATC base stations and mobile terminals in accordance with the terms, conditions, and
technical specifieations set forth in its application, except as otherwise provided herein, and in
compliance with the Commission‘s rules.
        44. This authorization will expire concurrently with the space—station license for the
Globalstar Big LEO MSS system and is subject to the following conditions:
        The licensee shall file a report disclosing the number of currently—functional space
        stations and the number of currently serviceable in—orbit spares in the Globalstar MSS
        satellite constellation minety days prior to GlobalStar‘s planned. commencement of

" seedt CER.§203
* see 47 CFR. § 209(a¥(14)and ATC Report and Ordeat 1243 ("iIfMSS licenseesseek t provideterestrl
mobilservie in MSS bands,thenthterestial componentothe MSS ATC serviceshallb subject o thesame
regulatory treatmentasany othr operator providing the same orsimilarservies in any otherband"). Seealso 47
crrgzoi8.
"* See 47 CFR. § 25 284. Seealso Revision ofthe Commision‘s ues o Ensure Compatiblty With Enanced
911 Emergency Caling Systens, CC Docket No. 4—102,Report and Orderand Second Further Notee ofProposed
Rulemaking, 18 FCC Red 25340 (2003)(secking comment on furtherimproving 911 servie by satelite CMRS
providers) (‘E9L1 Seope Order and FNPRMY)
* See GLLC ATC Application, ExhB (cetifying compllance with specific provisions of47 CR. §25.149), Ex
B—1 (proposing use of dual—mode MSS/ATC terminals and explaining how selfinterference willbe managed) and
ExhB—4 (descrbingterminaloperation)
                                                     16


                                Federal Communications Commission                         na oerr1

        commercial operation pursuant to this authorization. GlobalStar shall not commence
        ATC operations until GlobalStar meets the in—orbit spare—satellite requirement in Section
        25.149(b)(2)() or obtains a waiver of that requirement.
        ATC mobile terminal operation pursuant to this authorization shall comport with the
        emission limits specified in Paragraph 23, above.
        ATC services offered as Commercial Mobile Redio Services shall be provided in
        compliance with the requirements specified in Section 20.18(b)—(m) of the Commission‘s
        Rules, 47 C.FR. § 20.18(b)—(m)
       45.    Grant of this application is without prejudice to any action in pending rule making
proceedings conceming 911 and E911 obligations, including the 297/ Scope Order and FNPRM,
supra, and E911 Requirements for IP—Enabled Service Providers, WC Docket No. 05—196, First
Report and Order and Noticeof Proposed Rulemaking, 20 FCC Red 10245 (2008).
        46.     GLLC may decline this authorization as conditioned within 30 days from the date
of release of this order. Failure to respond within that period will constitute formal acceptance of
the authorization as conditioned.
       47.    IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the requests in the Informal Objection of the
Society of Broadcast Engineers filed on May 16, 2005 and the Comments of the Wireless
Communications Association Intemational, Inc., also filed on May 16, 2003, ARE DENTED.
        48.     This order is effective upon release. Petitions for reconsideration or applications
for review may be filed within thity days of the release date."
                                              FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION


                                            %2,QBlk— f.
                                               onald Abelson
                                              Chicf, International Bureau




"" See 47 CFR 5§ 1400@), 1.106,and 1.113.
                                                17



Document Created: 2006-01-20 14:28:09
Document Modified: 2006-01-20 14:28:09

© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC