Attachment request

request

SUBMISSION FOR THE RECORD submitted by ICO

request

2006-06-29

This document pretains to SAT-MOD-20050110-00004 for Modification on a Satellite Space Stations filing.

IBFS_SATMOD2005011000004_510612

                                                W A S H I N G T O ND.C.
                                                                    ,                  NEW YORK, SAN FRANCISCO,
                                                                                       10s A N G E L E S , P A L 0 A L T O ,
                                                ZOOOG-1888                             S A N D I E G O , W A S H I N G T O N . D.C.

                                                       z oEz . 8 8 7 . 1 ~ 0 0
                                                TELEPHON                               DENVER. NORTHERN VIRGINIA,
                                                                                       ORANGE COUNTY, SACRAMENTO,
                                                             202.887’07G3              WALNUT CREEK, CENTURY CITY

                                                                                       TOKYO, LONDON, BEIIING.

                                                                                       S I N G A P O R E , BRUSSELS




     June 29,2006


                        REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT


     By Hand Delivcry

     Marlene H. Dortch
                                                                             RECEIVED
     Secretary
                                                                                JUN 2 9 2006
     Federal Communications Commission
     445 12‘h Street, S.W., Room TW-A325                                  Federal Communicatians Comrnisslon
     Washington, D.C. 20554                                                       M f i e of S e c r W

            Re: New I C 0 Satellite Services G.P.
                File No. SAT-MOD-20050110-00004
                Call Sign S2561

     Dear Ms. Dortch:

     Pursuant to Section 25.143(e)(3) of the Commission’s rules,’ New I C 0 Satellite Services
     G.P. (“KO”) submits a certification (attached as Attachment 1) of completion of the
     milestone to “complete bus integration.”2 The I C 0 certification is suitable for public
     inspection.

     Subject to the confidentiality request stated below, I C 0 also submits the following
     documents to the International Bureau: (1) a letter from its satellite manufacturer, Space
     Systems/Loral (“SS/L”), certifying completion of bus integration for ICO’s geostationary
     satellite and receipt of all payments due under the manufacturing contract as of the date
     of the lettcr (attached as Attachment 2); and (2) a chart summarizing payments made
     under the manufacturing contract (attached as Attachment 3). I C 0 offers these
     documents, along with its own milestone certification, as evidence that I C 0 is proceeding
     with timely implementation of its 2 GHz mobile satellite service (“MSS”) system under
     the milestone schedule set forth in its authorization.



            ’ 4 7 C.F.R. fj 25.143(e)(3).                                                         .__-
                                                                                                   I
                                                                                                          I    ~




            ’ S e e ICOSateIlite Services, G.P., 20 FCC Rcd 9797, 7 38 (IB 200Sj.“ ’b’-!l~‘‘’‘!i4L




                          2006 ANNUAL REPORT


------


Marlene H. Dortch
June 29,2006
Page Two

Additionally, pursuant to paragraph 39 of the I C 0 Modfleation Order,3I C 0 hereby
notifies the Commission that contract milestone #26, specified in Appendix F of its
satellite manufacturing contract, is expected to be completed by July 27,2006, more than
 14 calendar days following the scheduled completion date of June 15,2006. This
particular contract milestone is not a required FCC implementation milestone. As
indicated in the letter from SS/L (attached as Attachment 4) (together with Attachments 2
and 3, “Milestone Documents,” all of which are subject to the confidentiality request
statcd below), the brief delay in completion of this contract milestone will not impact
timely completion of the FCC implementation milestones.

The Milestone Documents contain highly sensitive commercial and financial information.
Specifically, they include information regarding amounts due, payment terms, and
technical information specified in ICO’s manufacturing contract. The disclosure of this
information likely would cause substantial competitive and financial harm to ICO, and is
therefore exempted from mandatory disclosure under Exemption 4 of the Freedom of
Information Act (“FOIA Exemption 4’7)4and Section 0.457(d) of the Commission’s
rules.’ Accordingly, pursuant to Sections 0.457 and 0.459 of the Commission’s rulesY6
I C 0 requests the Commission to withhold from public inspection and accord confidential
treatment to the Milestone Documents.

In support of its request for confidential treatment and pursuant to the requirements under
Section 0.459(b) of the Commission’s rules, I C 0 states the following:

1. I C 0 seeks confidential treatment of the Milestone Documents, which contains
    specific information regarding amounts due, payment terms, and technical criteria.

2. As noted above, the Milestone Documents are being submitted to support ICO’s
   milestone certification, filed pursuant to Section 25.143(e)(3) of the Commission’s
   rules.

3. The Milestone Documents contain information regarding amounts due, payment
   terms, and technical criteria, which constitutes trade secrets or sensitive commercial
   and financial information that “would customarily be guarded from competi tors,”7



       4
         5 U.S.C. $ 552(b)(4). See Public Citizen Health Research Group v. FDA, 704 F.2d
1280, 1290-91 (D.C. Cir. 1983).

           47 C.F.R. § 0.457(d).

       ‘ I d . $9 0.457, 0.459.

           Id. $ 0.457(d)(2).


Marlene H. Dortch
June 29,2006
Page Three

   and is therefore exempted from mandatory disclosure under FOIA Exemption 4 and
   Section 0.457(d) of the Commission's rules.*

4. The Milestone Documents are related to the implementation of a 2 GHz MSS system,
   which will be subject to competition from a number of other MSS systems.

5. Disclosure of information regarding amounts due, payment terms, and technical
   information likely would result in substantial competitive harm to ICO. For example,
   disclosure of this information would allow competing MSS licensees to use this
   information to their competitive advantage. Specifically, knowledge of financial
   terms and conditions under ICO's manufacturing contract could allow competitors to
   obtain comparable or more favorable terms from other manufacturers. Furthermore,
   disclosure could harm I C 0 in future negotiations regarding satellite construction by
   allowing manufacturers to extract more favorable terms.

6. Article 3 1 of ICO's manufacturing contract contains specific provisions requiring
   both parties to the contract to maintain confidentiality of information furnished in
   connection with the contract or the transactions contemplated under the contract.

7. Information regarding amounts due, payment terms, and technical specifications is
   not available to the public. Consistent with and except as provided under the
   confidentiality provisions of ICO's manufacturing contract, there has been no
   disclosure of such information to any third parties.

8. I C 0 requests confidential treatmcnt of the Milestone Documents for an indefinite
   period. During the operational life of the I C 0 system, satellite manufacturers and 2
   GHz MSS competitors could use the otherwise confidential information to their
   competitive advantage and to IC0's detriment.

9. The Commission has acknowledged that satellite construction contracts contain
   competitively sensitive information requiring protection from public disclo~ure.~
   Specifically, the Commission has found that financial and technical data contained in
   a satellite construction contract constitutes confidential information because its
   disclosure would cause substantial harm to the licensee's competitive position."
   Moreover, in requiring Big LEO and 2 GHz MSS licensees to submit annual reports
   and any requested additional contract and construction information to demonstrate
   compliance with the milestones, the Commission expressly contemplated that


       ti   5 U.S.C.   5 552(b)(4); 47 C.F.R. 5 0.457(d).
       9
            See, e.g., GE American Communications, Inc., 16 FCC Rcd 673 1, 673 1 (IB 200 1).
       IO
            See American Satellite Co., 1985 FCC Lexis 31 17, at *19 (1985).


                   Marlene H. Dortch
                   June 29,2006
                   Page Four

                        licensees could seek confidential treatment of “any portion of their report, pursuant to
                        Section 0.459 of the Commission’s rules.””

                   In order to provide adequate protection from public disclosure, the Commission should
                   strictly limit distribution of the Milestone Documents within the Commission on a “need
                   to know” basis. In the event that any person or entity outside the Commission requests
                   disclosure of the Milestone Documents, I C 0 requests that it be so notified immediately
                   so that it can oppose such request or take other action to safeguard its interests as it
                   deems necessary.

                   Please direct any questions regarding this submission to the undersigned.

                                                                    Respectfully submitted,



                                                                    CheryY A. Tritt
                                                                    Counsel for New I C 0 Satellite Services G.P.

                   Enclosures
                   cc: Robert Nelson
                       Cassandra Thomas
                       Karl Kensinger
                       Andrea Kelly




                              11
                            See Amendment of the Commission’s Rules to Establish Rules and Policies Pertaining
                  to a Mobile Satellite Service in the 1610-1626.5/2483.5-2500 MHz Frequency Bands, 9 FCC Rcd
                  5936, 601 0 (1 994) (emphasis added); see also The Establishment of Policies and Service Rules
                 for the Mobile Satellite Service in the 2 GHz Band, 15 FCC Rcd 16121, 1618 1 (2000).



                  dc-455611




-   L . -
            -r-mrr---   ---- - -*- - . --- ---        m   1
                                                              ---                                                   1


                                  CERTIFICATION

       Pursuant to Section 25.143(e)(3) of the Commission’s rules, I, Dennis Schmitt,

certify under penalty of perjury that:

    1. I am a Senior Vice President of I C 0 GIobal Communications (Holdings) Limited,

       the ultimate parent of New IC0 Satellite Services G.P.(“KO”).

   2. To the best of my knowledge, information, and belief, IC0 has completed bus

       integration for its 2 GHz geostationary satellite orbit mobile satellite service

       satellite.




Date: June 29, 2006


               PUBLIC INSPECTION COPY




ATTACHMENT 2

 REDACTED


               PUBLIC INSPECTION COPY




ATTACHMENT 3

 REDACTED


               PUBLIC INSPECTION COPY




ATTACHMENT 4

 REDACTED



Document Created: 2006-07-11 11:35:01
Document Modified: 2006-07-11 11:35:01

© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC