Attachment ex parte

This document pretains to SAT-MOD-20031118-00333 for Modification on a Satellite Space Stations filing.

IBFS_SATMOD2003111800333_415551

EX PARTE Of?U T E FILED 61 Remote Satellite Systems INTERNATIONAL January 6,2005 Via Hand Delivery Ms. Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary Federal Communications Commission 445 12th Street, S.W. ORIGINAL Washington, D.C. 20554 Re: Mobile Satellite Ventures Subsidiary LLC Ex Parte Presentation IB Docket No. 01-185 File No. SAT-MOD-20031118-00333 (ATC application) File No. SAT-AMD-20031118-00332 (ATC application) File No. SES-MOD-20031118-01879 (ATC application) Dear Ms. Dortch: Remote Satellite Systems Intl. hereby urges the Commission to afford L-band Mobile Satellite Service (“MSS”) operators greater flexibility in their provision of an Ancillary Terrestrial Component (“ATC”), as requested by Mobile Satellite Ventures LP (“MSV”) in the above-captioned proceedings. The increased flexibility requested by MSV will ensure that next-generation MSS systems in the L-band can finally achieve the ubiquitous coverage, capacity, and economies of scale needed for a true consumer service. In contrast, the restrictions on L-band ATC advocated by Inmarsat Ventures plc (“Inmarsat”) will only ensure that MSS forever remains a niche service catering to price- insensitive users operating in remote areas. Remote Satellite Systems has provided MSS since 1995 using the L-band satellites of MSV and Mobile Satellite Ventures (Canada) Inc. We currently provides satellite vice and data services to end user customers throughout the United States including military installations, travelers, explorers and world relief organizations. While Remote Satellite Systems has developed a viable business that includes current-generation MSS satellites to serve niche markets, we are excited about the future potential for MSS when supplemented with ATC. To date, MSS has been characterized by suitcase-sized user terminals, limited coverage, low &ita rates, and equipment and service prices far exceeding that offered by terrestrial wireless operators. Because the market for this type of service is small, the economies of scale needed to drive down equipment and service prices have not developed. With ATC, however, MSS has the potential to evolve into a true consumer service. ATC will provide the coverage, capacity, and economies of scale needed to bring MSS equipment and service prices to affordable levels. Moreover, by overcoming satellite signal blockage in urban areas, ATC will allow MSS to become a truly ubiquitous service, allowing service providers to market their products to customers not only in rural and remote areas but to customers in the most densely populated urban cores as well. Remote Satellite Systems understands that concerns of potential interference that could delay MSV’s development of a next-generation MS S system. These concerns are overstated and speculative. For example, our customers will continue to use their satellite-only terminals after MSV deploys ATC, but we me not concerned that these terminals will experience interference from MSV’s ATC base stations. This is because our Customers do not use tbir%atellite-only terminals in areas where MSV is expected to deploy base stations to overcome satellite signal blockw.. By definition, if MSV needs to deploy an ATC base station to overcome signal blockage, our satellite-onlyterminals will not work effectively in those areas. , , x - The Commission is at a crossroads in the development of MSS technology. Remote Satellite Systems International urges the Commission to follow the path dinnovation and better consumer service by adopting MSV’s proposals for increased flexibility for ATC in the L-band. Very truly yours, Robert B. Rosen, President REMOTE SATELLITE SYSTEMS m?~: 10 FOURTH STREET, SUITE 208, SANTA ROSA, CA 95401 TEL.707.!i45.8199 FAX.707.546.8198 WWW.REMOTESATELLITE.COM


Document Created: 2005-01-21 11:53:53
Document Modified: 2005-01-21 11:53:53
© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC