Attachment Spectrum Five - Comm

Spectrum Five - Comm

LETTER submitted by IB, FCC

Commission letter June 29 2015

2015-06-29

This document pretains to SAT-LOI-20150416-00025 for Letter of Intent on a Satellite Space Stations filing.

IBFS_SATLOI2015041600025_1094084

                              Federal Communications Commission
                                       Washington, D.C. 20554


                                               June 29, 2015


David Wilson
Spectrum Five LLC
1776 K Street, NW, Suite 200
Washington D.C. 20006

                                                   Re:     Spectrum Five LLC
                                                           IBFS File No.: SAT—LOI—20150416—00025
                                                           Call Sign: $2940

Dear Mr. Wilson:

        This letter requests additional information regarding Spectrum Five‘s above captioned Letter of
Intent to provide service to the United States using a 17/24 GHs broadcasting—satellite service (BSS)
space station authorized by the Netherlands, to be known as BSSNET2A—111W, from the 110.9° W.L.
orbital location. To assist the Satellite Division with the processing of this application, we request,
pursuant to Section 25.111(a) of the Commission‘s rules, that Spectrum Five provide the following
information, explanations, and clarifications:

        1. Section 25.114(c)(4)(ii) of the Commission‘s rules requires applicants to specify the maximum
        EIRP and maximum EIRP density for each space station transmitting antenna beam. Spectrum
        Five has provided maximum EIRP values for transmitting beams CONL and CONR in Table
        $7(m) of Schedule S, but no maximum EIRP density values for these beams. Please provide
        maximum EIRP density values for both of these beams.‘

        2. Section 25.114(c)(4)(v) of the Commission‘s rules requires applicants to specify both the
        minimum and maximum saturation flux density at beam peak for each space station receiving
        beam (other than command beams). Although Spectrum Five‘s application has provided the
        minimum saturation flux density values in Table $7(p) of Schedule S, we do not find a maximum
        value. Please provide this information.

        3. Section 25.114(d)(18) of the Commission‘s rules requires applicants for 17/24 GHz BSS space
        stations to specify a maximum orbital eccentricity value. Spectrum Five did not include this
        information in its current application. Please provide this information.

        4. In its application and in Table S3(a) of Schedule S, Spectrum Five indicates that it will operate
        at the 110.9° W.L. orbital location. However, in Table S8(d) of Schedule S, Spectrum Five
        provides an orbital longitude of 115° W.L. Please confirm that 110.9° W.L. is the intended
        orbital location.



‘ In the PFD discussion found in Section 7.2 of the technical narrative, Spectrum Five includes a row labeled
"Density."The entry for 0 degrees elevation angle and peak EIRP of 60.2 dBW is —117.3 dBW/m*/MHz. This value,
however, is given for a single downlink beam named "US CONU+", which does not correspond to either of the
downlink beams named in Table $7 of Schedule S. Moreover, as there are two downlink beams provided in
Schedule S, there should be two maximum EIRP density values provided, evenif they are the same for each beam.


           5. Please explain what is meant by Spectrum Five‘s statement that "all TWTAs will be outgassed
           prior to post—mission disposal.""

           6. Please clarify the basis for the conclusion that no operational systems would operate within +/—
           0.05 degrees of 110.9° W.L., particularly when the 0.05 degree stationkeeping excursions for the
           BSSNET2A—1 11W and space stations located at 111.0° W.L. are taken into consideration.‘ If
           these conclusions are based on contact with other operators or publicly available data, please
           specify the basis for the conclusions.

           7. Please confirm that Spectrum Five will provide a contact point for receiving Joint Space
           Operations Center (JSPOC) conjunction notifications, and describe any further measures
           Spectrum Five will take with respect to collision avoidance procedures. _

        _ 8. Spectrum Five states that it has not yet settled upon exact specifications for the physical
          characteristics of the satellite.* Accordingly, please confirm that, when these parameters are
          finalized, Spectrum Five "will" assess fuel gauging uncertainty and ensure that the budgeted
          propellant, taking into account such uncertainty, provides an adequate margin of fuel reserve so—
          that the disposal orbit will be achieved."

          9. Please clarify the arrangements for telemetry, tracking, and command (TT&C) operations.
          Spectrum Five states that it is required to perform TT&C operations from a control center in the
          Netherlands Antilles." Spectrum Five also states that "command signals from the TT&C control
          center are received via a dual antenna system: (1) a narrow beam antenna located in the
          Southwest US for GSO operations..."" Spectrum Five includes a link budget that refers to a
          "space station to LA" TT&C center.° Please clarify how TT&C operations will be conducted,
          specifying the location of TT&C antennas and control center.

          10. Please clarify Spectrum Five‘s statements regarding compliance with the foreign licensing
          requirements in Section 25.137 of the Commission‘s rules. 47 C.F.R. § 25.137. Spectrum Five
          states that the Netherlands and the Netherland Antilles have granted it the right to use 17/24 GHz
          BSS frequencies at the 110.9° W.L. orbital location pursuant to a 2007 agreement between the
          State of the Netherlands, the Government of the Netherland Antilles, and Spectrum Five.®
          According to Spectrum Five, the agreement also states that the Netherland Antilles will provide


2 Spectrum Five LLC, IBFS File No. SAT—LOI—20150416—00025 (Spectrum Five Application), Exhibit A at 21.

3 Id. at 22.             |
4 Id. at 15, 16.
5 Id. at 24.

6 Id., Narrative at 5.

7 Id., Exhibit A at 9.

8 Id. at 32.

* Id., Narrative at 4.


              licenses for Spectrum Five‘s telemetry, tracking, and command operations. Spectrum Five
              further states that in 2006 it satisfied the Commission‘s ECO—Sat test using the Netherlands and
          Netherland Antilles as the relevant markets, and that "there have been no changes in relevant
          Netherlands law or policy since the agency‘s ECO—Sat finding."" We note, however, that the
          Netherlands Antilles was dissolved in 2010 and that the constituent islands now have different
          governments and status with the Netherlands. As a result, we are not able to determine whether
          Spectrum Five has satisfied the Commission‘s ECO—Sat test or Spectrum Five‘s rights and
          obligations regarding space station operations at the 110.9° W.L. orbital location. Please provide
          any updated information regarding Spectrum Five‘s rights to use the 17/24 GHz frequencies at
          the 110.9° W.L. orbital location and licensing for its TT&C operations.

        The information, clarifications, and explanations requested above must be submitted by July 29,
2015.    Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of Spectrum Five‘s application pursuant to Section
25.112(c) of the Commission‘s rules, 47 C.F.R. § 25.112(c).

                                                      Sincerely,



                                                    %wfx\bkqud
                                                      P Albuque
                                                             que
                                                      Chief, Satellite Division
                                                      International Bureau




9 TJ, at 7.



Document Created: 2015-06-29 18:03:23
Document Modified: 2015-06-29 18:03:23

© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC