O3b Request for Clar

REQUEST submitted by O3b Limited

O3b Request for Clarification

2010-06-03

This document pretains to SAT-LOI-20091110-00119 for Letter of Intent on a Satellite Space Stations filing.

IBFS_SATLOI2009111000119_820818

03b Limited
St. John‘s Manor Offices
Le Neuf Chemin                                                                                        -_—__
St. John, Jersey JE3 4EH                                                                              v
Channel Islands
T +44 (0) 1534 865 000
F144 0) 18 hod 301                                                                                               Networks
www.o3bnetworks.com




          Via INTERNATIONAL BUREAU FILING SYSTEM

          June 3, 2010

          Marlene H. Dortch
          Secretary
          Federal Communications Commission
          445 12th Street S.W.
          Washington, D.C. 20554


          Dear Ms. Dortch:

          Re:        Request for Clarification and/or Reconsideration of Stamp Grant
                     Hughes Network Systems, LLC
                     File No. SAT—LOI—20091110—00119, Call Sign $2753

                 O3b Limited ("O3b") respectfully requests clarification and/or reconsideration of
          the Stamp Grant of the Letter of Intent for the SPACEWAY 4 satellite filed by Hughes
          Network Systems, LLC ("Hughes").‘ O3b Limited is a United Kingdom—based company
          preparing to launch a non—geostationary Ka—band satellite system that will use some of
          same frequencies as SPACEWAY 4.

                Specifically, O3b requests that the International Bureau ("Bureau") clarify that
          Hughes‘s authority to operate SPACEWAY 4 using the 28.6—29.1 GHz frequency band is
          on a secondary basis with respect to non—geostationary satellite orbit ("NGSO‘") fixed—
          satellite service ("FSS") operations. As the Bureau is aware, the 28.6—29.1 GHz
          frequency band is allocated to the NGSO FSS on a primary basis, and to the
          geostationary satellite orbit ("GSO") FSS on a secondary basis." As a result, Hughes‘s
          use of those frequencies on the geostationary SPACEWAY 4 satellite must be on a non—
          protected, non—harmful interference basis relative to NGSO FSS systems in the same
          band." Indeed, Hughes itself requested authority to use this band "on a secondary, non—
          harmful interference basis" only.*

          ‘ See Stamp Grant, File No. SAT—LOI—20091110—00119, Call Sign $2753 (granted May 5, 2010; corrected
          Jun. 1, 2010) ("SPACEWAY 4 Grant‘); Public Notice, SAT—00687, Policy Branch Information: Actions
          Taken, DA—10—785 (May 7, 2010).
          * See Rulemaking to Amend Parts 1. 2. 21. and 25 ofthe Commission‘s Rules to Redesignate the 27.5—29.5
          GHz Frequency Band, to Reallocate the 29.5—30.0 GHz Frequency Band, to Establish Rules and Policies
          for Local Multipoint Distribution Service andfor Fixed Satellite Services, FCC 96—3 11, First Report and
          Order and Fourth Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 11 FCC Red 19005, at 19024, 19030—31 (1996).
          3 See 47 C.F.R. § 2.104(d).
          * Letter of Intent at 12, File No. SAT—LOI—20091110—00119 (filed Nov. 10, 2009).


Marlene H. Dortch
Federal Communications Commission
June 3, 2010                                                                              Page 2 of 3


       In previous grants of authority to GSO FSS systems to use the primary NGSO
FSS frequencies, the International Bureau has expressly reminded the GSO FSS licensee
that operations in those frequencies are on a secondary basis only." Oddly, however, the
SPACEWAY 4 Grant contains no language regarding secondary operations in the 28.6—
29.1 GHz frequency band, even though it contains protective language for the other non—
primary GSO FSS bands in which SPACEWAY 4 will be operating.© In this regard, the
omission of language regarding the secondary status of Hughes‘s use of the 28.6—29.1
GHz band appears to be an oversight.

        On this basis, O3b respectfully requests that the International Bureau clarify
and/or reconsider the SPACEWAY 4 Grant by:

         (1)     inserting a reminder in the Preamble that use of the 28.6—29.1 GHz band is
                 on a secondary basis;"‘ and

         (2)     adding the following express condition:

                         Hughes is authorized to use the 28.6—29.1 GHz frequency
                         band, which is designated for GSO FSS use on a secondary
                         basis with respect to primary NGSO FSS operations. 47
                         C.F.R. § 2.104(d). As a secondary user, Hughes‘s
                         operations cannot cause harmful interference to or claim
                         protection from harmful interference from stations on a
                         primary service. Hughes shall immediately cease
                         operations upon notification of such harmful interference
                         resulting from its operations."

         As explained above, clarifying the SPACEWAY 4 Grant in the requested manner
would be consistent with the Commission‘s Ka—band Band Plan, and is indeed compelled
by it. Such a clarification would also be consistent with Hughes‘s request to operate in
the 28.6—29.1 GHz band on a secondary basis only. Finally, the requested clarification
would best serve the public interest by removing any uncertainty as to the basis upon

* See ViaSat, Inc., Stamp Grant at Preamble (use of 28.6—29.1 GHz on secondary basis), condition 5
(express condition regarding use of 28.6—29.1 GHz on a secondary basis), File No. SAT—MOD—20091127—
00129 (granted Apr. 20, 2010) ("ViaSat—77.3"); ViaSat, Inc. Stamp Grant at Preamble (use of 28.6—29.1
GHz on secondary basis), File No. SAT—LOI—20080107—00006, et al. (granted Aug. 18, 2009) ("ViaSat—
IOM").
© See SPACEWAY 4 Grant at Preamble, condition 5 (authorizing the use of the 18.8—19.3 GHz band on a
non—interference basis relative to primary NGSO FSS operations in that band).
‘ See ViaSat—77.3 and ViaSat—IOM.
8 See ViaSat—IOM at condition 5.


Marlene H. Dortch
Federal Communications Commission
June 3, 2010                                                                                    Page 3 of 3


which Hughes is authorized to operate in the 28.6—29.1 GHz band for all interested
     fae
parties.
           9

           Please contact the undersigned if you have any questions regarding this letter.

                                                       Respectfully submitted,




                                             be      _z _ is
                                                   "~ Brian Holz
                                                       Executive Vice President and Chief
                                                         Technology Officer
                                                      O3b Limited
                                                      Tel: (720) 961—4454


cc: (by electronic mail)

Stephen Baruch, Lerman Senter PLLC, sbaruch@lermansenter.com
Steven Doiron, Hughes Network Systems, Inc., steven.doiron@hughes.com
Robert Nelsen, International Bureau, robert.nelson@fee.gov
Stephen Duall, International Bureau, stephen.duall@fec.gov




°   See Star One S.4., DA 08—1645, Order on Reconsideration, 23 FCC Red 10896, at «| 5 (2008). As noted
above, 03b is preparing to launch a next—generation NGSO FSS satellite network that uses the Ka—band
frequencies, including the 28.6—29.1 GHz band allocated for primary NGSO FSS operations. See
hitp://www.o3bnetworks.com. O3b is therefore adversely affected by any uncertainty as to the basis upon
which Hughes has been granted authority to operate SPACEWAY 4 in the 28.6—29.1 GHz frequency band.
O3b did not intervene at an earlier stage of this proceeding because it reasonably expected the International
Bureau to process the SPACEWAY 4 Letter of Intent consistent with precedent and Hughes‘s statement
that it would operate the 28.6—29.1 GHz band "on a secondary, non—harmful interference basis." Letter of
Intent at 12.



Document Created: 2019-04-20 22:23:03
Document Modified: 2019-04-20 22:23:03

© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC