SES and O3b Comments

COMMENT submitted by SES S.A. and O3b Limited

Comments of SES S.A and O3B LIMITED

2017-09-25

This document pretains to SAT-LOA-20170301-00027 for Application to Launch and Operate on a Satellite Space Stations filing.

IBFS_SATLOA2017030100027_1281524

                                       Before the
                        FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
                                 Washington, D.C. 20554

    In the Matter of                                       )
                                                           )
    Space Exploration Holdings, LLC                        )   SAT-LOA-20170301-00027; Call Sign S2992
                                                           )
    Telesat Canada                                         )   SAT-PDR-20170301-00023; Call Sign S2991
                                                           )
    NGSO-Like Satellite Applications or Petitions for      )
    U.S. Market Access in the 37.5-40.0 GHz, 40.0-         )
    42.0 GHz, 47.2-50.2 GHz and 50.4-51.4 GHz Bands        )


                         COMMENTS OF SES S.A. AND O3B LIMITED

                  SES S.A. (“SES”) and its subsidiary O3b Limited (“O3b”), hereby comment on

the above-captioned non-geostationary orbit (“NGSO”) satellite license application and request

for authority to serve the U.S. market (collectively, the “V-band NGSO Filings”). 1 As discussed

herein, SES and O3b urge the Commission to defer action on the V-band NGSO Filings until

appropriate standards to prevent interference to V-band geostationary orbit (“GSO”) systems are

in place. In addition, the Commission must impose clear requirements regarding any future

NGSO system’s obligation to share spectrum with other co-frequency NGSO operations.

Finally, any authorizations issued must include terms and conditions consistent with those

imposed in other bands on other NGSO operators, including O3b.

                                          BACKGROUND

                  SES, one of the world’s largest commercial communications satellite operators, is

uniquely positioned to address issues raised by the V-band NGSO Filings because its facilities

include both GSO and NGSO satellite fleets. SES entities operate more than 50 GSO satellites


1
 Space Exploration Holdings, LLC, File No. SAT-LOA-20170301-00027 (the “SpaceX
Application”); Telesat Canada, SAT-PDR-20170301-00023 (the “Telesat Petition”).


able to reach 99% of the world’s population, many of them pursuant to Commission authority.

SES subsidiary O3b provides high-throughput, low-latency connectivity via an NGSO satellite

network authorized to serve the U.S.2 that combines satellite reach with fiber optic speed,

delivering the performance of fiber in places terrestrial networks do not reach, and making

affordable broadband connectivity possible for billions of consumers and businesses in nearly

180 countries. O3b currently operates twelve satellites in a Medium Earth Orbit (“MEO”)

configuration, and has requested authority for additional spacecraft and spectrum in order to

accommodate growing demand for O3b’s high-performance connectivity. 3

               The V-band NGSO Filings seek Commission authority for new NGSO fixed-

satellite service (“FSS”) systems that would operate in the 37.5-40.0 GHz, 40.0-42.0 GHz, 47.2-

50.2 GHz and 50.4-51.4 GHz Bands (collectively the “V-band”). While the Commission does

not have service rules for the V-band, the band may also be used by GSO satellite systems. As

other FSS bands become increasingly saturated, access to V-band spectrum is critical to permit

expansion of existing GSO and NGSO satellite services in response to customer demand.

Accordingly, a Commission framework to ensure that proposed NGSO operations will be able to

successfully co-exist both with future GSO operations and with other NGSO systems must be in

place before the Commission can act on the V-band NGSO Filings. Any grants that are

ultimately issued must also include terms and conditions similar to those applied to O3b and

other NGSO FSS systems in other bands.




2
 O3b Limited, Call Sign S2935, File Nos. SAT-LOI-20141029-00118 & SAT-AMD-20150115-
00004, grant-stamped Jan. 22, 2015, corrected and re-issued June 2, 2015 (the “O3b Market
Access Grant”).
3
 O3b Limited, Call Sign S2935, File Nos. SAT-MOD-20160624-00060; SAT-AMD-20161115-
00116; & SAT-AMD-20170301-00026.


I.            THE COMMISSION MUST ADOPT RULES TO PROTECT GSO
              OPERATIONS BEFORE ACTING ON THE V-BAND NGSO FILINGS

                      As discussed above, the bands identified in the above-captioned proceedings are

     available for use by GSO and NGSO systems. The Commission cannot permit NGSO systems to

     operate in these bands unless it has adequate sharing mechanisms in place to ensure that the

     NGSO systems in the V-band will protect future GSO satellite networks from interference.

                      As both SpaceX and Telesat recognize, there are no Commission rules in place to

     facilitate sharing between GSO and NGSO systems in the V-band.4 Notably, there is a pending

     application with the Commission for a V-band GSO system, 5 which adds urgency to the need for

     clearly defined V-band service rules for sharing the band between GSO and NGSO systems.

                      Similarly, the International Telecommunication Union (“ITU”) has not yet

     defined a technical mechanism to facilitate V-band GSO and NGSO systems sharing

     frequencies, but recognizes the need to develop such a mechanism. Currently, No. 22.2 of the

     ITU Radio Regulations applies in V-band frequencies, specifying that NGSO systems shall not

     cause unacceptable interference to, or claim protection from, GSO networks. SES and O3b are

     supporting efforts pursuant to Resolution 159 (WRC-15) to develop approaches for spectrum

     sharing between GSO and NGSO satellite systems in these frequencies and believes the

     Commission should look to that process for guidance as it contemplates rules to protect V-band

     GSO systems from NGSO interference.6




     4
         See SpaceX Application, Attachment A at 32; Telesat Petition, Technical Exhibit at 15.
     5
         See Hughes Networks System, Call Sign S3017, File No. SAT-LOA-20170621-00092.
     6
      See O3b Limited, Call Sign S2935, File No. SAT-AMD-20170301-00026 (the “O3b V-Band
     Amendment”), Technical Annex at 10.


               Pending adoption of a comprehensive NGSO-GSO sharing framework, SES and

O3b urge the Commission to defer action on the V-band NGSO Filings. SES and O3b recognize

that in the Ku/Ka-band NGSO processing round, the Commission determined that it could act on

the OneWeb application in advance of completing the related rulemaking addressing Ka-band

NGSO operational matters.7 However, in those frequencies, the Commission could rely on

international EPFD limits already in place, and the OneWeb authorization specifically required

compliance with those international limits. 8 In addition, the Commission had already developed

a full record in response to its comprehensive set of proposals in the NGSO rulemaking

proceeding. 9 In contrast, the effort to develop protection criteria for V-band GSO systems is still

at a very early stage, with adoption of any ITU standards still years away and no pending

Commission rulemaking that is examining V-band NGSO-GSO sharing.

               In light of these differences, acting on the V-band NGSO Filings subject to the

outcome of future proceedings would create unnecessary uncertainty for NGSO and GSO

systems alike. A V-band NGSO applicant that received a grant would have to decide whether to

accept the authority conferred without any meaningful guidance regarding the requirements that

would ultimately apply to its system in order to prevent harmful interference to GSO networks.

Operators developing GSO systems in the V-band would similarly have no concrete assurances

regarding how and to what extent their future systems will be protected from interference.


7
 WorldVu Satellites Limited Petition for a Declaratory Ruling Granting Access to the U.S.
Market for the OneWeb NGSO FSS System, File No. SAT-LOI-20160428-00041, Order and
Declaratory Ruling, FCC 17-77 (rel. June 23, 2017) (“OneWeb Grant”) ¶ 12.
8
  See id., ¶ 23(h) (OneWeb’s authority is conditioned on its compliance with EPFD requirements
in Article 22 of the ITU Radio Regulations).
9
 Update to Parts 2 and 25 Concerning Non-Geostationary, Fixed-Satellite Service Systems and
Related Matters, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 31 FCC Rcd 13651 (2016) (“NGSO NPRM”).


                      As the Commission made clear in the OneWeb Grant, a Commission rulemaking

      is the appropriate proceeding in which to make “decisions of general applicability.” 10 Any

      Commission attempt to address NGSO-GSO sharing matters in the context of individual

      application proceedings would violate that principle and put the cart before the horse. Prior to

      authorizing V-band NGSO systems for operations in the U.S., the Commission must establish a

      framework for NGSO-GSO sharing based on a fully developed record. Until such a framework

      is in place, the Commission should hold the V-band NGSO Filings in abeyance.

II.            SHARING AMONG NGSO SYSTEMS CAN PRIMARILY BE ACHIEVED
               THROUGH COORDINATION, BUT BAND SEGMENTATION DURING
               IN-LINE EVENTS MAY BE NEEDED AS A LAST RESORT

                      In response to the Commission’s Notice of Proposed Rulemaking for NGSO

      satellite systems (“NGSO NPRM”),11 SES and O3b joined other commenters in supporting

      Commission proposals to facilitate sharing among NGSO systems by encouraging coordination

      agreements focused on avoiding in-line events, as described in Section 25.261 of the

      Commission’s rules.12 We agreed that band segmentation should not be the first recourse in

      accommodating multiple NGSO systems but noted that dividing up the spectrum for the duration

      of an in-line event would be necessary in certain instances. 13 Moreover, SES and O3b urged the

      Commission to reject arguments that ITU priority should determine sharing status among NGSO



      10
           OneWeb Grant, ¶ 12.
      11
        Update to Parts 2 and 25 Concerning Non-Geostationary, Fixed-Satellite Service Systems and
      Related Matters, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 31 FCC Rcd 13651 (2016).
      12
        Comments of SES S.A. and O3b Limited in IB Docket No. 16-408, filed Feb. 27, 2017
      (“SES/O3b NGSO NPRM Comments”) at 23-27; Reply Comments of SES S.A. and O3b
      Limited in IB Docket No. 16-408, filed Apr. 10, 2017 (“SES/O3b NGSO NPRM Reply
      Comments”) at 19-27 & n.85 (citing other comments).
      13
           SES/O3b NGSO NPRM Comments at 24-25.


       systems authorized to serve the U.S. market.14 The Commission should apply these policies for

       NGSO-to-NGSO sharing to the V-band NGSO Filings.

                       Section 25.261 currently only applies to the 18.8-19.3 GHz and 28.6-29.1 GHz

       frequency bands. In the NGSO NPRM, the Commission has proposed to expand the scope of

       Section 25.261 to apply to several other bands. 15 SES and O3b believe the Commission should

       also consider including V-band spectrum in Section 25.261 in order to facilitate NGSO-to-

       NGSO sharing in V-band frequencies.

III.            ANY GRANTS OF V-BAND NGSO FILINGS SHOULD INCLUDE
                STANDARD OPERATING CONDITIONS

                       If the Commission determines that grant of a V-band NGSO Filing is in the public

       interest, it should include in the authorization conditions designed to ensure that the planned

       operations will be consistent with Commission policies and rules as well as with international

       coordination obligations. The Commission can look to the O3b Market Access Grant and the

       OneWeb Grant for appropriate language on these matters. In particular, the following condition

       paragraphs from the O3b Market Access Grant should be applied to any grants of the V-band

       NGSO Filings:

                Preamble: Operations pursuant to the grant must comport with the legal and technical
                specifications set forth by the applicant or petitioner and with Federal Communications
                Commission rules not waived herein. 16


       14
            SES/O3b NGSO NPRM Reply Comments at 26-27 & nn.118 & 120.
       15
         NGSO NPRM, ¶ 23. See also Update to Parts 2 and 25 Concerning Non-Geostationary,
       Fixed-Satellite Service Systems and Related Matters, NGSO Draft Report and Order, released
       Sept. 7, 2017.
       16
         Under the specific circumstances presented, the Commission determined that including this
       language in the OneWeb Grant was unnecessary (see OneWeb Grant at 11 n.71), but SES and
       O3b note that this provision is standard in International Bureau space station license grants and
       market access authorizations. See, e.g., SES Americom, Inc., File No. SAT-MOD-20170316-


       Condition 2: Operations must comply with all coordination agreements.

       Condition 3: Requirement to maintain and make available to the North American
       Defense Command ephemeris data for each satellite.

       Condition 5: Requirement to comply with applicable PFD limits.

       Condition 6: Requirement to comply with applicable EPFD limits.

       Condition 12: Designation of the means by which the system will share spectrum with
       other NGSO constellations issued prior to or as part of this processing round.

Grants should also include a provision similar to paragraph 26 of the OneWeb Grant specifying

that authorizations granted are subject to modification in order to conform to future rules or

policies adopted by the Commission.

               The following conditions imposed on O3b should also be incorporated if the

Commission grants the Telesat Petition seeking U.S. market access for its foreign-licensed

NGSO network:

       Condition 1: Limitation of services that can be provided to include only those covered by
       the WTO agreement.

       Condition 11: Restrictions on the ability to reposition or activate satellites in the NGSO
       constellation without Commission approval.

       Condition 15: Specification regarding the orbital debris regulatory framework for
       applicants relying on the orbital debris mitigation rules of other jurisdictions.

               Incorporation of the above provisions is consistent with Commission rules and

precedent and is necessary to ensure that operations pursuant to the V-band NGSO Filings will

conform to applicable regulatory requirements.




00051, granted June 14, 2017, Attachment to Grant at 1; SES Satellites (Gibraltar) Ltd., File
No. SAT-PPL-20160512-0048, granted Dec. 7, 2016, Attachment to Grant at 2. Consistent with
this precedent, the language should be included in any grants of the V-band NGSO Filings.


IV.           CONCLUSION

                     For the foregoing reasons, the Commission should defer action on the V-band

      NGSO Filings pending adoption of rules and policies for sharing in this spectrum. The

      Commission should employ its standard condition language in any grants issued in response to

      the filings.

                                                 Respectfully submitted,

                                                 SES S.A. AND O3B LIMITED

                                                 By: /s/ Gerald E. Oberst
 Of Counsel                                      Senior Vice President, Global Regulatory and
 Karis A. Hastings                               Governmental Strategy, SES S.A.
 SatCom Law LLC                                  1129 20th Street N.W., Suite 1000
 1317 F Street, N.W., Suite 400                  Washington, D.C. 20036
 Washington, D.C. 20004
 karis@satcomlaw.com                             By: /s/ Suzanne H. Malloy
                                                 Vice President, Regulatory Affairs, O3b Limited
                                                 900 17th Street, N.W.
                                                 Washington, D.C. 20006
      September 25, 2017


                               CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

              I hereby certify that on this 25th day of September, 2017, I caused to be served a

true copy of the foregoing “Reply of SES S.A. and O3b Limited” by first class mail, postage

prepaid, upon the following:

 Henry Goldberg                                      Elisabeth Neasmith
 GOLDBERG, GODLES, WIENER & WRIGHT,                  Director, Spectrum Management and
 LLP                                                 Development
 1025 Connecticut Avenue, N.W.                       1601 Telesat Court
 Washington, DC 20036                                Ottawa, Ontario
 Counsel to Telesat                                  Canada, K1B 5P4



 William Wiltshire                                   Tim Hughes
 HARRIS, WILTSHIRE & GRANNIS LLP                     SPACE EXPLORATION TECHNOLOGIES
 1919 M Street, N.W. Suite 800                       CORP.
 Washington, DC 20036                                1030 15th Street, NW Suite 220E
 Counsel to SpaceX                                   Washington, DC 20005



                                            /s/
                                            Alicia Tambe



Document Created: 2017-09-25 16:32:34
Document Modified: 2017-09-25 16:32:34

© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC