Attachment request

request

REQUEST submitted by Ondas Spain SL

request

2006-01-13

This document pretains to SAT-LOA-20050311-00061 for Application to Launch and Operate on a Satellite Space Stations filing.

IBFS_SATLOA2005031100061_509478

                                                           ORIGINAL
VinsonElkins
         S2666        SAT-LOA-2005031 100061                18200500055:
         AfriSpace, Inc.
         AFRISTAR-2                                                          RECEIVED - FCC

                                                                                    JAN 1 3 2006
                                                                           MeralCommunicatjonCommission
     January 13,2006                                                              Bureau / Office

     Donald Abelson
     Chief, International Bureau
     Federal Communications Commission
     445 Twelfth Street, S.W., Room 6-C750
     Washington, D.C. 20554

              Re:        Request to Clarify Processing Rules for
                         Broadcast Satellite Service (sound) Applications
                         Interim Application Freeze

     Dear Mr. Abelson:

             We write on behalf of Ondas Spain, SL (Ondas) to req
     the processing rules for Broadcast Satellite Service (sound) (BSS (sound)) applications
     tendered following the Bureau's January 3, 2006 grant of authority to AfriSpace Inc.
     (Ahspace) to launch and operate a new BSS(sound) satellite, Afistar-2, at 21 degrees E.L.
     to serve Europe and Africa using 2.6 MHz of spectrum in the L-band (1452-1492 MHz).'

           Ondas, supported by its leading U S . investor, Delphi Corp., is developing a
     competing satellite radio system for Europe in the same BSS (sound) frequency band.

             As you are aware, even though the 2.3 GHz band Digital Audio Radio Satellite
     (DARS) service was excluded fiom the new processing rules adopted in the First Space
     Station Licensing Reform Order2, in a case of first impression, the Bureau applied those
     rules to the AfriSpace BSS satellite and classified it as a non-geostationary orbit (N.GS0)-
     like satellite. On its own motion, the Bureau then waived the modified processing round
     procedures applicable to such applications under Section 25.157 of the Rules apd granted
     AfriSpace's application. When a NGSO-like application is filed, Section 25.157 ordinarily
     requires the Bureau to issue a public notice to invite competing applications and to consider
     them concurrently.



     I
      AfrisDace. Inc.. Order and Authorization, DA-06-4, released January 3,2006 ("Afristar-2 Order").
      See Amendment of the Commission's Space Station Licensing Rules and Policies, First Report and Order and
     Further Notice of ProDosed Rulemalung, IB Docket No. 02-34,18 FCC Rcd 10760,10764 (Para. 3, n.4) (2003)
     (First SDace Station Licensing Reform Order).


     Vinson & Elkins LLP Attorneys at Law Austin Beijing Dallas Dubai      The Willard Office Building, 1455 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Suite 600
     Houston London Moscow New York Shanghai Tokyo Washington              Washington, DC 20004-1008 Tel202.639.6500 Fax 202.639.6604
                                                                           www.velaw.com


                                                                 Donald Abelson January 13,2006 Page 2




        The Afristar-2 Order also states that if AfriSpace wishes to operate Aftistar-2 on an
other spectrum in the 1452-1492 MHz band, it must file a modification application to do so .
                                                                                                    Y
However, the Bureau did not state how any such application would be treated under the
Commission’s Rules.

         It is our view that any new satellite license application or license modification
application seeking BSS (sound) service spectrum in the 1452-1492 MHz band must be
treated as a NGSO-like satellite application and subject to the modified processing
procedures contained in Section 25.157 of the Rules. Pursuant to this provision, we also think
that if any such license or license modification application for spectrum in this band were to
be docketed, the Bureau must first determine if the application is acceptable for filing and, if
so, the application must be placed on public notice as a “lead application”. Said public notice
would initiate a processing round, establish a cut-off date for competing NGSO-like satellite
applications, and provide interested parties an opportunity to file responsive pleadings
regarding the application pursuant to Section 25.154 of the Rules. Consistent with the
foregoing, we think that it would be inappropriate for the Bureau, on its own motion or in
response to the request of an applicant, to waive Section 25.157 of the Rules in order to
grant the application absent the issuance of such a public notice and without soliciting
competing applications (i.e., to issue a grant on a first-come, first-served basis).

        We would be grateful if you would confirm that our view of the applicable
BSS(sound) satellite application procedures going forward accords with that of the Bureau
and, if not, advise us in what respect the Bureau has a different view and the reasons
therefore.

       Finally, given the uncertainty as to applicable processing rules regarding future BSS
(sound) applications in the L-band (i.e., whether the NGSO-like processing rules will be
uniformly applied), we believe that the public interest requires the adoption of an interim
processing freeze on all such applications and request that the Bureau implement such a
freeze forthwith. By declining to accept such applications until the processing rules have
been clarified, the Bureau will permit all interested parties to have the same opportunity to
tender acceptable applications in the future and will not be viewed as favoring any particular
applicant or class of applicants.




 See Afiistar-2 Order, Para. 16.


                                                          Donald Abelson January 13,2006 Page 3




       We are also prepared to augment the foregoing by filing a formal request for a
declaratory ruling and such other petitions as may be appropriate. We look forward to
hearing from you at your earliest convenience.




                                        Robert A. Mazer          \




cc:   Cassandra Thomas
      Fern Jarmulnek
      Gardner Foster
      Robert Nelson
      Jim Ball



Document Created: 2006-07-10 11:04:49
Document Modified: 2006-07-10 11:04:49

© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC