Attachment DA 03-1510

DA 03-1510

ORDER submitted by FCC, IB

Order

2003-05-07

This document pretains to SAT-LOA-19880128-00046 for Application to Launch and Operate on a Satellite Space Stations filing.

IBFS_SATLOA1988012800046_352581

                                     Federal Communications Commission                                   DA 03-1510



                                                       Before the
                                    Federal Communications Commission
                                          Washington, D.C. 20554


In the Matter of                                            1
                                                        1   )

EchoStar Satellite Corporation                              1
                                                            1        File No. DBS-88-01
                                                            )
For Assignment of Direct Broadcast                          )
Satellite Orbital Position and Channels                     1
                                                            1
                                                            )



                                                      ORDER

    Adopted: May 7,2003                                                  Released: May 7,2003

By the Chief, Satellite Division, International Bureau:

                                            I.       INTRODUCTION

          1.      In this Order we grant EchoStar Satellite Corporation's (Echostar) outstanding
assignment for 11 channels for a Direct Broadcast Satellite (DBS) system. As described below, EchoStar
is entitled to use 11 DBS channels pursuant to its 1989 permit. Specifically, we authorize EchoStar to
operate a satellite using three channels at the 157" W.L. orbital location and eight channels at the 148"
W.L. orbital location.

                                             11.      BACKGROUND

         2.      This action follows a Memorandum Opinion and Order (EchoStar Order) in which the
Satellite Division concluded that EchoStar had satisfied the first due diligence condition of its permit to
operate a DBS system at a western orbital location.' In the EchoStar Order, the Division found that
EchoStar had demonstrated that it has contracted for the construction of a satellite to be located at a
western orbital location.2 As explained in the EchoStar Order, particular orbital positions and channels
are not assigned to a DBS permittee unless and until a permittee has demonstrated that it has fulfilled this
component of the due diligence requirements. Pursuant to its permit, EchoStar is entitled to use 11 DBS
channels at a western orbital 10cation.~EchoStar requested an assignment of eight channels at 148" W.L.
and three channels at 175" W.L.4 The Division concluded, however, that Echostar's due diligence

' EchoStar Satellite Corporation, For Assignment of Direct Broadcast Satellite Orbital Position and Channels,
Memorandum Opinion and Order, 17 FCC Rcd 8827 (Int'l Bur. 2002) (Echostar Order). Compass System, Inc.
filed an Application for Review of this Order on June 17,2002. We will address this application in a separate order.
* EchoStar Order, 17 FCC Rcd at 8829.
    Continental Satellite Corporation, et al., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 4 FCC Rcd 6292, 6300 (1989).
4
  Letter to Magalie Roman Salas, Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, from David K. Moskowitz,
Senior Vice President and General Counsel, EchoStar Satellite Corporation (January 8, 2002). At the time the
EchoStar DBS permit was granted the eastlwest pairing rule was in effect. Under this rule, DBS channels would be
assigned in eastlwest pairs with service to the eastern half of the United States permitted from the 6 1.5" W.L., I O 1O
                                                                                                         (continued....)


                                    Federal Communications Commission                                  DA 03-1510


showing demonstrated its intent to construct only one satellite. Consequently, the Division ordered
EchoStar to select one western orbital location and provided EchoStar 10 days to specify a revised
preference for an orbital location and channel a~signment.~

          3.      On May 28,2002, EchoStar submitted its request for 11 odd-numbered channels, 1-2 1, at
the 157" W.L. orbital location! EchoStar explained that the 148' W.L. orbital location was no longer a
feasible option because it was entitled to 11 channels, and only eight channels were available at the 148"
W.L. orbital location. Further, the 175' W.L. orbital location was no longer viable because its prior
authorization for 22 channels at that location had been cancelled, making an assignment at the
westernmost orbit slot unattractive.' Thereafter, the Division nonetheless directed EchoStar to select one
of its original orbital location selections, either 148" W.L. or 175" W.L.' In response, EchoStar requested
to use the eight remaining channels at 148" W.L. subject to a request for further review of its entitlement
to its full compliment of 11 channels.'

          4.      Subsequently, on February 1 1,2003, EchoStar advised the Commission that the "ideal
placement" of its 11 frequencies would be eight channels at 148" W.L. and three channels at 157" W.L."
EchoStar is presently using the eight channels at 148" W.L. pursuant to a grant of special temporary
authority. As a result, EchoStar asserts it would be able to continue to provide service to the public at that
location under a permanent authorization." With respect to the three channels at 157" W.L., EchoStar
states it would bring the channels into timely use by moving an existing satellite, EchoStar 4,to that
orbital location.I2 EchoStar observes that although EchoStar 4 is not operating at full capacity, it has
enough functioning transponders to operate over three channels. As a result, according to Echostar,
EchoStar 4 is well suited to operate at 157" W.L.13

       5.       In further support of its request for three channels at the 157" W.L. orbital location,
EchoStar indicates that the tilt or "slew" angle to transmit to the United States is attainable by EchoStar 4
from 157" W.L. but not likely from 175" W.L.14 EchoStar explains that the slew angle is the degree of tilt

(...continued from previous page)
W.L., 110" W.L. and 1 19" W.L. orbital locations, and service to the western half of the United States permitted from
the 148" W.L., 157" W.L., 166" W.L. and 175" W.L. orbital locations. Subsequently the east/west pairing policy
was eliminated because full coverage of the contiguous United States (CONUS) is technically possible from several
of the eastern locations.
     EchoStur Order, 17 FCC Rcd at 8830.
6
 Letter to Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, from Pantelis Michalopoulos,
Counsel for EchoStar Satellite Corporation (May 28,2002).
'Id.
* Letter to Pantelis Michalopoulas, Counsel for EchoStar Satellite Corporation, from Cassandra C. Thomas, Deputy
Chief, Satellite Division (December 24,2002).
9
 Letter to Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, from David R. Goodfriend,
Director, Legal and Business Affairs, EchoStar Satellite Corporation (Jan. 3, 2003); see also, EchoStar Satellite
Corporation, Application for Review, Filed January 23,2003.
loLetter to Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, from David R. Goodfriend,
Director, Legal and Business Affairs, EchoStar Satellite Corporation (February 1 1,2003) (EchoStur Feb. I I Letter).
I'   Id.
l2   Id.
l3   Id.
l4   Id. at p. 2.

                                                         2


                                       Federal Communications Commission                            DA 03-1510


 to which a satellite's control system must be to orient the spacecraft in space, to effectively transmit to the
 United States. EchoStar states it is more capable of maintaining the slew angle for EchoStar 4 from the
 157" W.L. orbital location. This is because EchoStar 4's design specifications limit the capability of
 maintaining the higher slew angle required at 175" W.L. Thus, EchoStar 4 would require the use of more
 station keeping fuel at 175" W.L. than would be needed to maintain the slew angle and keep the satellite
 in place at 157O W.L.I5 In addition, EchoStar states that customers receiving service from 148" W.L. will
 also be able to receive service from 157" W.L. utilizing existing receive dishes, but would not be able to
.do so from a satellite located at 175" W.L.16


                                                 111.     DISCUSSION

          6.     Echostar's 1989 permit entitled it to operate 1 1 channels in the western portion of the
orbital arc.17 EchoStar requested authority to operate its 1 1 channels at two orbital locations. The
Division found that while EchoStar had satisfied it due diligence showing, it had contracted for only one
satellite. The Division, therefore, requested EchoStar to implement all of its channels at one orbital
location. EchoStar responded, however, that under a revised business plan it could provide service to the
public most expeditiously by utilizing two orbital locations. Specifically, EchoStar indicates that it can
implement this plan by moving an in-orbit satellite to 157" W.L. and by operating the channels at 148"
W.L., on a regularly-licensed basis, that it is now operating pursuant to special temporary authority.

          7.     The purpose of the Commission's DBS due diligence rules, and its policy of assigning
orbit locations and channels only after a construction contract is in place, is to ensure that permittees
implement services to the public in a timely manner and do not warehouse spectrum." We see no reason
to preclude EchoStar from operating its 11 channels at two orbit locations because it can do so
immediately. Limiting EchoStar to one orbit location because its initial contract involved only one
satellite would frustrate its business plans and undermine the purpose of our due diligence requirement.
Indeed, EchoStar can meet its ultimate due diligence milestone - providing service to the public -
immediately upon grant of these assignments. Thus, we assign EchoStar to operate on three channels at
the 157" W.L. orbital location, and eight channels at the 148" W.L. orbital location.

         8.      With respect to the three channels at the 157" W.L. orbital location, EchoStar states that it
intends to move EchoStar 4 to this lo~ation.'~   This will allow EchoStar to provide timely service to the
public. We note, however, Echostar's acknowledgement that EchoStar 4 is not operating at full capacity
because of several transponder anomalies.*' As a result, we require EchoStar to ensure continuity of
service by filing a timely application for a replacement satellite before EchoStar 4 is no longer able to
provide service from 157" W.L.

       9.      With respect to 148" W.L., there are eight unassigned channels at this orbital location.
Under the circumstances in this case, we will assign EchoStar to these eight channels. EchoStar has had a

l5   Id.
'6   Id.
l7 Continental Satellite Corporation, 4 FCC Rcd at 6299. In 1992 EchoStar was assigned 11 channels at the 119"
W.L. orbital location and granted additional time to demonstrate due diligence for its proposed western satellite.
EchoStar Satellite Corporation, Assignment of Direct Broadcast Satellite Orbital Positions and Channels,
Memorandum Opinion and Order, 7 FCC Rcd 1765, 1770 (1 992).
l8   Dominion Video Satellite, Order, 14 FCC Rcd 8 182 (Int'l Bur. 1999).
19
     The EchoStar 4 satellite is presently at the 119" W.L. orbital location.
2o   EchoStar Feb. I I Letter, at 1.

                                                              3


                                     Federal Communications Commission                                    DA 03-1510


longstanding interest in DBS channels at 148" W.L.21 It is currently licensed and operating on the other
twenty-four channels at 148" W.L. and is providing service on the remaining eight channels under special
temporary authority. 22 There are no pending requests for DBS frequencies at 148" W.L. EchoStar is able
to provide immediate service to the public from these channels. As the only entity licensed to operate
from the 148" W.L. orbital location, EchoStar can use the additional channels to provide continued and
enhanced service to its customers from a single space station platform.23

                              IV. CONCLUSION AND ORDERING CLAUSES

        10.      Based on the foregoing, we assign EchoStar Satellite Corporation 11 DBS channels
pursuant to its western DBS permit, File No. DBS-88-01, eight channels at the 148" W.L. orbital location
and three channels at the 157" W.L. orbital location.

         1 1.   Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the authorization of EchoStar Satellite Corporation is
modified to allow EchoStar to move the EchoStar 4 satellite to the 157" W.L. orbital location and provide
service from channels 1 , 3 and 5.

         12.      IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that EchoStar Satellite Corporation has 120 days from the
release date of this Order to move EchoStar 4 from the 119" W.L. orbital location to the 157" W.L. orbital
location and must notify the Commission within 10 days of the relocation.

       13.     IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that during the drift of EchoStar 4 from 119' W.L. to the
157" W.L. orbital location, EchoStar Satellite Corporation shall coordinate its tracking, telemetry, and
control (TT&C) operations with existing geostationary satellites to ensure that no unacceptable
interference results from EchoStar 4's TT&C operations.

           14.   IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the authorization granted in this Order is subject to the
following conditions: (1) until the International Telecommunication Union (ITU) Region 2 Broadcasting
Satellite Service (BSS) Plan and its associated Feeder Link Plan are modified to include the technical
parameters of EchoStar 4 and its associated feeder links, this satellite system shall not cause greater
interference than that which would occur from the current U.S. assignments in the Region 2 BSS Plan at
157" W.L. to other BSS or other services or satellite systems operating in accordance with the ITU Radio
Regulations; and (2) no protection from interference caused by radio stations authorized by other
administrations is guaranteed to EchoStar 4 unless and until Appendices 30 and 30A plan modification
procedures are successfully and timely completed.

       15.      IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that EchoStar Satellite Corporation is authorized to operate
EchoStar 2 to provide DBS service from channels 18-32 (even) at the 148" W.L. orbital location.

         16.     IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the authorization granted in this Order is subject to the
following conditions: (1) until the International Telecommunication Union (ITU) Region 2 Broadcasting
Satellite Service (BSS) Plan and its associated Feeder Link Plan are modified to include the technical
parameters of EchoStar 2 and its associated feeder links, this satellite system shall not cause greater
interference than that which would occur from the current U.S. assignments in the Region 2 BSS Plan at

21   Continental Satellite Corp., 4 FCC Rcd at 6295; EchoStar Satellite Corporation, 7 FCC Rcd at 1770.
22   EchoStar Satellite Corporation, Order andduthorization, DA 03- 1263 (released April 25,2003).
23 See Letter to David Moskowitz, Senior Vice President and General Counsel, EchoStar Satellite Corporation,
Request for STA (SAT-STA-20011025-0009l), from Thomas S. Tycz, Chief, Satellite and Radiocommunication
Division (December 28, 2001) (requiring EchoStar to notify its customers that service may .be diminished or
discontinued at any time).

                                                          4


                                 Federal Communications Commission                           DA 03-1510


148" W.L. to other BSS or other services or satellite systems operating in accordance with the ITU Radio
Regulations; and (2) no protection from interference caused by radio stations authorized by other
administrations is guaranteed to EchoStar 2 unless and until Appendices 30 and 30A plan modification
procedures are successfully and timely completed.

        17.     IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that EchoStar Satellite Corporation is no longer required to
submit a revised construction milestone schedule as set forth in paragraph 1 1 in EchoStar Satellite
Corporation, For Assignment of Direct Broadcast Satellite Orbital Position and Channels, Memorandum
Opinion and Order, 17 FCC Rcd 8827 (Int'l Bur. 2002).

        18.     This action is taken pursuant to Section 0.261 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R.
5 0.261 and is effective upon release.

                                                 FEYERAL COMMUNICATIONS
                                                                  _.-   COMMISSION
                                                                              ~




                                                 Chief                        Y
                                                 Satellite Division




                                                    5



Document Created: 2004-01-14 17:25:13
Document Modified: 2004-01-14 17:25:13

© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC