Attachment Narrative Attachment

This document pretains to SAT-AMD-20180131-00013 for Amended Filing on a Satellite Space Stations filing.

IBFS_SATAMD2018013100013_1332406

                                  Before the
                    FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
                             Washington, DC 20554


 In the Matter of                        )
                                         )
 THE BOEING COMPANY                      )   Call Sign: S2993
                                         )
 Application for Authority               )   File Nos. SAT-LOA-20170301-00028,
 to Launch and Operate a                 )   SAT-AMD-20170929-00137 &
 Non-Geostationary Satellite Orbit       )   SAT-AMD-2018____-_____
 System in the Fixed Satellite Service   )




                               AMENDMENT




 Audrey L. Allison                                    Bruce A. Olcott
 Senior Director, Frequency Management Services       Jones Day
 The Boeing Company                                   51 Louisiana Ave. NW
 929 Long Bridge Drive                                Washington, DC 20001
 Arlington, VA 22202                                  (202) 879-3630
 (703) 465-3215
                                                      Its Attorneys


January 31, 2018


                                        TABLE OF CONTENTS

I.   NARRATIVE INFORMATION REQUIRED BY PART 25 ...................................2

§ 25.114(c)(4) Minimum G/T and 3 dB Beamwidth .................................................... 2

§ 25.114(d)(1)(i)        System Facilities, Operations and Services and How Uplink
                         Frequency Bands Connect to Downlink Frequency Bands .............. 3

A.     System Frequency Usage and Frequency Plan ...................................................... 3

       6.    Inter-Satellite Links ........................................................................................ 3

§ 25.114(d)(6) Public Interest Considerations .............................................................. 4

§ 25.116       Amendments to Applications ...................................................................... 6

§ 25.157       Consideration of Applications for NGSO-like Satellite Operation ........... 10

§ 25.279       Inter-Satellite Service ................................................................................ 13




                                                          i


                                  Before the
                    FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
                             Washington, DC 20554

 In the Matter of                            )
                                             )
 THE BOEING COMPANY                          )    Call Sign: S2993
                                             )
 Application for Authority                   )    File Nos. SAT-LOA-20170301-00028,
 to Launch and Operate a                     )    SAT-AMD-20170929-00137 &
 Non-Geostationary Satellite Orbit           )    SAT-AMD-2018____-_____
 System in the Fixed Satellite Service       )


                                    AMENDMENT

       The Boeing Company (“Boeing”), pursuant to Sections 308 and 309 of the

Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 308 and 309, hereby amends its

above-captioned Application to add additional frequencies for inter-satellite link (“ISL”)

communications in the 65-71 GHz band. The information provided in this narrative

supplements the materials already filed by Boeing in support of its Application and does

not replace any of those prior materials. The Schedule S that is filed with this Amendment,

however, does replace the two previous Schedule S submissions that Boeing has made in

support of this Application.

       The narrative portion of this Amendment addresses those sections of the

Commission’s rules that are relevant to this Amendment and are required to be addressed

in narrative form. The section headers in this narrative are intended to match the related

section headers that were used in the narrative exhibit for Boeing’s underlying Application.

In addition, this narrative requests the Commission to grant waivers of Sections 25.116 and

25.157 of the rules to the extent that the Commission concludes that such waivers are

necessary in order to grant this Amendment.

                                             1


I.     NARRATIVE INFORMATION REQUIRED BY PART 25

                                    *      *       *

§ 25.114(c)(4) Minimum G/T and 3 dB Beamwidth

       Section 25.114(c)(4)(v) of the Commission’s rules requires satellite system

applicants to specify for each shapeable receive beam the minimum and maximum gain-

to-temperature ratio (“G/T”) within each shapeable beam’s proposed coverage area. In

addition, Section 25.114(c)(4)(vi)(B) of the Commission’s rules requires satellite system

applicants seeking to operate ISLs to provide the peak antenna gain and 3 dB beamwidth

for each ISL beam. The form Schedule S does not appear to include input fields for

minimum G/T or 3 dB beamwidth. The values for the receiving beams are therefore

provided in the table below using the same beam identification numbers (“IDs”) that are

included in the “Receiving Beams” and “Transmitting Beams” sections of the Schedule S.

In addition, the 3 dB beamwidth for the ISL transmit beams are provided in the subsequent

table below again using the same beam IDs that are included in the Schedule S.

           Receive Beam ID      Minimum G/T, dB/K       3 dB beamwidth, deg
                X4L0                  12.0                      1.7
                X5L0                  12.0                      1.7
                X4R0                  12.0                      1.7
                X5R0                  12.0                      1.7
                X6L0                  16.5                      0.9
                X7L0                  16.5                      0.9
                X6R0                  16.5                      0.9
                X7R0                  16.5                      0.9
                XAL1                  15.8                      1.0
                XBL1                  15.8                      1.0
                XAR1                  15.8                      1.0
                XBR1                  15.8                      1.0
                XCL1                  18.6                      0.7
                XDL1                  18.6                      0.7
                XCR1                  18.6                      0.7
                XDR1                  18.6                      0.7

                                          2


                        Transmit Beam ID         3 dB beamwidth, deg
                             X0L0                        1.2
                             X1L0                        1.2
                             X0R0                        1.2
                             X1R0                        1.2
                             X2L0                        0.7
                             X3L0                        0.7
                             X2R0                        0.7
                             X3R0                        0.7
                             X2L1                        1.0
                             X3L1                        1.0
                             X2R1                        1.0
                             X3R1                        1.0
                             X8L1                        0.7
                             X9L1                        0.7
                             X8R1                        0.7
                             X9R1                        0.7


§ 25.114(d)(1) System Facilities, Operations and Services and How Uplink
               Frequency Bands Connect to Downlink Frequency Bands

                                      *        *       *

       A.      System Frequency Usage and Frequency Plan

                                      *        *       *

               6.      Inter-Satellite Links

       As Boeing has explained in other filings associated with its Application, Boeing is

proposing to operate ISLs both between the satellites within its constellation and with

satellites in geostationary satellite orbit (“GSO”) and other non-geostationary satellite orbit

(“NGSO”) constellations. Boeing has requested authority to operate some of these ISLs

on a secondary basis in the Ka-band between its low Earth orbit (“LEO”) constellation and

the satellites of GSO networks and other NGSO systems.            Boeing has also requested

authority to operate ISLs and on a primary basis in the V-band frequencies of 47.2-50.2

GHz and 50.4-51.4 GHz between the LEO satellites within its constellation (i.e., LEO-to-

                                             3


LEO) and between its LEO constellation and Boeing inclined NGSO satellites, along with

the GSO and NGSO satellites of other operators.

         With this Amendment, Boeing is additionally requesting authority to operate ISLs

in the 65-71 GHz band, which is allocated on a primary basis for both GSO and NGSO ISL

transmissions. 1 Boeing proposes to use ISLs in the 65-71 GHz solely for transmissions

between its LEO satellites. This capability will increase the efficiency and functionality of

Boeing’s LEO constellation, while providing much greater flexibility in the geographic

location of gateway earth stations used to support Boeing’s NGSO satellite system.

§ 25.114(d)(6) Public Interest Considerations

         As Boeing explained in its Application, NGSO satellite systems are uniquely

capable of bringing essential Internet access to those regions of the world that are removed

from the fiber optic network or unreached by cell phone towers. Satellite broadband

coverage is ubiquitous. Unlike other broadband technologies, the power of satellite is

available to anyone with a clear line of sight to the sky overhead, whether they are on an

airplane in flight, a ship in the ocean, in mountainous America, or abroad. Its reach

potential and inherent technological capabilities make satellite broadband uniquely capable

of resolving the most complex connectivity problems and providing a robust competitive

alternative to terrestrial broadband distribution technologies.

         A critical component to a broadband satellite network is adequate backhaul

facilities to interconnect satellite communications with the internet backbone and end-user

data processing centers. For a LEO network without ISLs, this often requires the placement



1
    See 47 C.F.R. §§ 2.106, 25.202(a)(5).

                                             4


of gateway earth stations within sufficient proximity to each other so that each LEO

satellite is always within view of at least one gateway earth station, with additional

gateways in view to ensure signal diversity. The use of ISLs between LEO satellites

enables the system to route broadband transmissions from LEO satellites that may be

operating outside the view of a gateway earth station to other LEO satellites within view

of the desired gateway earth station.

       Boeing previously requested the use of ISLs for its LEO network using spectrum

in the V-band and Ka-band (the latter on a secondary basis). Boeing, however, is uncertain

whether it will be able to coordinate sufficient access to V-band and Ka-band frequencies

for ISL transmissions in order to ensure uninterrupted transmissions and data access to the

desired gateway earth station locations for specific transmissions.

       In contrast, the addition of very high capacity LEO-to-LEO ISLs in the 65-71 GHz

band could ensure that every LEO satellite in Boeing’s constellation will be able to route

selected broadband traffic to other LEO satellites to address situations in which the satellite

is outside the view of a gateway earth station, or in which user traffic destinations

ultimately lie within the coverage area of another LEO satellite. Therefore, the use of ISLs

in the 65-71 GHz band by Boeing’s NGSO system will serve the public interest by enabling

Boeing to use its satellite system to help close the digital divide with respect to consumer

groups that do not – and often cannot – be served adequately by terrestrial broadband

communications systems. The Commission should therefore grant Boeing’s NGSO system

application as amended herein.




                                             5


§ 25.116     Amendments to Applications

         In support of this Amendment, Boeing requests a determination by the

Commission that it may grant this Amendment without placing into question the inclusion

of Boeing’s underlying Application in the processing round that was initiated on

November 1, 2016 for NGSO applications seeking authority to operate in the V-band. 2

In the alternative, Boeing requests a waiver of Section 25.116 based on the public interest

benefits of its proposed Amendment. 3

         Section 25.116 of the Commission’s rules indicates that amendments to NGSO

system applications will be treated as major amendments if they change the proposed

frequencies to be used. 4 Except in certain circumstances, applications that are subject to

major amendments following the cut-off deadline for an application processing round are

treated by the Commission as newly filed applications. 5 The Commission can refrain

from treating an application as newly filed if the major amendment “resolves frequency




2
  Public Notice, Satellite Policy Branch Information, Boeing Application Accepted for
Filing in Part, IBFS File No. SAT-LOA-20160622-00058, DA 16-1244 (Nov. 1, 2016)
(“V-Band Processing Round Public Notice”).
3
  If the Commission concludes that it must treat this Amendment as a major amendment
pursuant to Section 25.116 and is unable to waive this requirement, then Boeing will seek
to withdraw this Amendment and will instead seek to modify its NGSO system license to
add ISL frequencies in the 65-71 GHz band once the underlying Application has been
granted by the Commission.
4
    47 C.F.R. § 25.116(b)(1).
5
    47 C.F.R. § 25.116(c).


                                            6


conflicts with authorized stations or other pending applications but does not create new

or increased frequency conflicts.” 6

         As a threshold point, Boeing questions whether the restrictions of Section 25.116

should be deemed applicable to Boeing’s Amendment. Although Boeing’s Amendment

seeks to add additional frequencies for ISLs, the additional frequencies are not among

those that were included in the cut-off notice that initiated the V-band processing round. 7

Instead, Boeing is making no changes in its Application with respect to the V-band

frequencies that were included in the cut-off public notice. A conclusion that Section

25.116 is not applicable to Boeing’s Amendment would also seem consistent with Section

25.156(d)(4) of the Commission’s rules, which explains that “[a]pplications for feeder-

link authority or inter-satellite link authority will be treated like an application separate

from its associated service band.” 8

          If the Commission concludes that Section 25.116 is applicable to Boeing’s

Amendment, Boeing urges the Commission to permit the Amendment without treating

the underlying Application as newly filed because the Amendment resolves frequency

conflicts with other pending applications but does not create new or increased frequency

conflicts. 9




6
    47 C.F.R. §25.116(c)(1).
7
  See V-Band Processing Round Public Notice (establishing a cut-off deadline for
applications seeking authority to use the 37.5-40.0 GHz, 40.0-42.0 GHz, 47.2-50.2 GHz
and 50.4-51.4 GHz band).
8
    47 C.F.R. § 25.156(d)(4).
9
    47 C.F.R. §25.116(c)(1).

                                             7


       Boeing’s addition of LEO-to-LEO ISLs in the 65-71 GHz band will permit Boeing

to operate LEO-to-LEO ISL transmissions independently of the 47.2-50.2 GHz and 50.4-

51.4 GHz bands. Such a change would enable Boeing to resolve potential frequency

conflicts that might otherwise exist with respect to the operation of Boeing’s LEO-to-

LEO ISL transmissions in the 47.2-50.2 GHz and 50.4-51.4 GHz bands on a co-frequency

basis with the other NGSO FSS satellite systems that have proposed to operate in these

frequencies.

       Second, the operation of very high capacity LEO-to-LEO ISLs in the 65-71 GHz

band will increase Boeing’s flexibility to locate its gateway earth stations for its NGSO

system outside heavily populated areas and therefore will help to resolve potential

frequency conflicts and avoid coordination obligations with licensees in the

Commission’s Upper Microwave Flexible Use Service (“UMFUS”). Boeing’s proposed

use of high capacity LEO-to-LEO ISLs in the 65-71 GHz band will serve to increase the

proportion of its gateway earth stations that can be located in very rural areas where

UMFUS licensees are unlikely to deploy.

       The Commission should also permit Boeing to maintain its Application in the

existing process round because Boeing’s Amendment will not create any new or increased

frequency conflicts. Currently, there are no satellite systems operating in the fixed-
                                                           10
satellite service (“FSS”) using the 65-71 GHz band.             One applicant, Audacy

Corporation, has requested Commission authority to operate ISLs in the 65-71 GHz



10
  See Use of Spectrum Bands Above 24 GHz For Mobile Radio Services, et al., GN Docket
No. 14-177, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, FCC 15-138, ¶ 55 (Oct. 23, 2015) (“Spectrum
Frontiers NPRM”).


                                           8


band. 11 Audacy has acknowledged that its proposed system can easily share the 65-71

GHz band with other NGSO satellite systems given “the small number (3) of Audacy’s

links and narrow beamwidth (<0.5°)” of its proposed ISL transmissions. 12 In addition,

the Commission has previously concluded that the six gigahertz of spectrum that is

available for ISLs in the 65-71 GHz band can accommodate the simultaneous operation

of ISL transmissions for a significant number of satellite systems. 13 Therefore, the

Commission can grant Boeing’s Amendment without creating frequency conflicts for

proposed satellite systems that may operate in the future in the 65-71 GHz frequencies.

          If, however, the Commission concludes that the exceptions to the major

amendment rule that are included in Sections 25.116(c) are not available to Boeing’s

Amendment, Boeing requests that the Commission grant Boeing a waiver of Section

25.116 in order to permit Boeing to pursue its Amendment while maintaining its

Application in the current processing round. Good cause exists to grant such a waiver.

          As noted above, Boeing’s Amendment seeks to add ISL frequencies that are

unrelated to the frequency bands that were the subject of the cut-off deadline. Further,

the addition of Boeing’s proposed ISLs in the 65-71 GHz band would relieve coordination


11
   Audacy Corporation, Application for Authority to Launch and Operate a Non-
Geostationary Medium Earth Orbit Satellite System in the Fixed- and Inter-Satellite
Services, IBFS FCC File No. SAT-LOA-20161115-00117 (March 1, 2017) (“Audacy
Application”).
12
     Id. at 79.
13
   See Amendment of Part 2 of the Commission’s Rules to Allocate Additional Spectrum to
the Inter-Satellite, Fixed, and Mobile Services and to Permit Unlicensed Devices to Use
Certain Segments in the 50.2-50.4 GHz and 51.4-71.0 GHz Bands, ET Docket No. 99-261,
Report and Order, FCC 00-442, ¶ 45 (Dec. 22, 2000) (“2000 ISL Order”) (concluding that
“the 65-71 GHz band can accommodate all pending requests by NGSO commercial
licensees for ISS spectrum,” which, at the time, included numerous proposed systems).

                                           9


pressure and potential frequency conflicts with respect to spectrum sharing between the

various GSO and NGSO systems that have proposed to operate in the 47.2-50.2 GHz and

the 50.4-51.4 GHz bands. The addition of Boeing’s proposed ISLs in the 65-71 GHz band

can also enable Boeing to locate more of its gateway earth stations in very rural areas,

thus enhancing the ability of Boeing’s NGSO satellite system to share the 37.5-40.0 GHz

and the 47.2-48.2 GHz band with UMFUS licensees. Each of these factors would promote

the most robust and efficient use of spectrum resources and thereby enhance the provision

of broadband services to consumers. Therefore, good cause exists for the Commission to

grant a waiver of Section 25.116 to Boeing.

§ 25.157 Consideration of Applications for NGSO-like Satellite Operation

          Boeing herein requests a waiver of Section 25.157(c) of the Commission’s rules,

which indicates that applications for authority to launch and operate “NGSO-like”

satellite systems must be evaluated using application cut-offs and processing rounds.52

As the Commission has acknowledged, the use of a cut-off and processing round is

unnecessary when the proposed operations of an NGSO satellite system will not preclude

entry by additional NGSO satellite systems. 14 Boeing’s proposed use of the 65-71 GHz

band for LEO-to-LEO ISLs will not preclude the use of this spectrum for ISLs by other

GSO or NGSO satellite operators.

          The Commission has granted waivers of the Section 25.157 requirement on a

number of occasions. For example, the Commission twice granted a waiver of Section

25.157(c) to O3b Limited (“O3b”) due to the “opportunities for additional entrants to


14
     See infra notes 15, 16 and 18.


                                           10


operate” on a co-frequency basis with O3b. 15 The Commission also granted a waiver of

this rule to Northrop Grumman for its proposed V-band NGSO system after

acknowledging that “Northrop Grumman’s NGSO satellites will employ a mechanism

designed to permit multiple NGSO systems to operate in the same spectrum by limited

the number of in-line interference events between NGSO systems and dividing the

spectrum among the affected NGSO systems during such events. 16 This approach, of

course, was eventually incorporated into the Commission’s rules to ensure that co-

frequency spectrum sharing can be achieved between all proposed NGSO systems. 17

Waivers of the Section 25.157(c) processing round requirement have additionally been

granted to other NGSO system applicants based on the Commission’s recognition that the

launch of these systems would “not preclude additional entry” by other satellite systems. 18

       In this case, Boeing is seeking a waiver of the processing round requirement for

ISL transmissions between LEO satellites operating in the 65-71 GHz band. As noted in

the previous section of this Amendment, there are currently no operational FSS satellite


15
  O3b Limited, Space Station Authorization, IBFS File Nos. SAT-LOI-20151029-00118
and SAT-AMD-20150115-00004, Attachment 1, ¶ 12 (Jan. 22, 2015); O3b Limited, Radio
Station Authorization, IBFS File No. SES-LIC-20100723-00952, at 4 (Sept. 25, 2012)
(Special Provision 90043).
16
  See Northrop Grumman Space & Missions Systems Corporation, IBFS File No. SAT-
LOA-19970904-00080 et al., DA 09-428, Order and Authorization, 24 FCC Rcd 2330,
2342, ¶ 33 (Int'l Bur. 2009).
17
  Update to Parts 2 and 25 Concerning Non-Geostationary, Fixed-Satellite Service
Systems and Related Matters, Report & Order and Further Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking, 32 FCC Rcd 7809, 7825, ¶ 49 (2017).
18
  Digital Globe, Inc., DA 05-2640, Order and Authorization, 20 FCC Rcd 15696, 15698-
99, ¶¶ 6-8 (Int’l Bur. 2005); Space Imaging, LLC, IB Docket No. 02-34, Declaratory Order
and Order and Authorization, 20 FCC Rcd 11964, ¶¶ 10, 11 (Int'l Bur. 2005).


                                           11


systems using the 65-71 GHz band. 19 One applicant, Audacy Corporation, has requested

Commission authority to operate ISLs in the 65-71 GHz band, but Audacy has

acknowledged that its spectrum requirements for ISLs will be modest. 20

         When the Commission designated the 65-71 GHz band for ISL transmissions to

support commercial satellite systems, it did so in response to applications that were filed

by numerous satellite operators. The Commission concluded that the six gigahertz of

spectrum that is available for ISLs in the 65-71 GHz band can accommodate the

simultaneous operation of ISL transmissions for a significant number of satellite

systems. 21 Based on the IBFS database, the Commission granted ISL authorizations for

20 individual GSO satellites, the Teledesic NGSO system, and also considered

applications for ISLs to support other NGSO satellite systems. None of these systems

were constructed, however, and the 65-71 GHz band remains available to support ISL

transmissions for a large number of satellite systems. Therefore, the Commission can

grant a waiver of the processing round requirement for Boeing’s Amendment without

jeopardizing the ability of numerous future satellite systems to also operate ISL

transmissions in the 65-71 GHz band.

         Boeing observes that Audacy also requested a waiver of the processing round

requirements with respect to its request to operate ISLs in the 65-71 GHz band. Although

the Commission has refrained thus far from making a decision on Audacy’s request, the


19
     See Spectrum Frontiers NPRM, ¶ 55.
20
  Audacy Application at 79 (acknowledging “the small number (3) of Audacy’s links and
narrow beamwidth (<0.5°)” of its proposed ISL transmissions”).
21
     See 2000 ISL Order, ¶ 45.


                                           12


Commission did place Audacy’s application on public notice for comment. 22 Numerous

parties filed petitions to deny and other comments addressing Audacy’s application. None

of those parties, however, raised any objection to Audacy’s proposal to operate ISLs in

the 65-71 GHz band or to Audacy’s request for a waiver of the processing round

requirement with respect to this aspect of Audacy’s application. The Commission should

therefore appropriately conclude that good cause exists to grant the ISL authorizations of

Audacy and Boeing with respect to the 65-71 GHz band without engaging in the

unnecessary administrative delay and burden of initiating a processing round for NGSO-

like applications seeking to also operate ISLs in the 65-71 GHz band.

§ 25.279 Inter-Satellite Service

       Boeing recognizes that portions of the 65-71 GHz band are also allocated on a co-

primary basis to other space services, including the Earth Exploration Satellite Service and

the Radionavigation-Satellite Service, and may be used for various purposes by the U.S.

Federal government. Consistent with Section 25.279 of the Commission’s rules, Boeing

will coordinate the operations of its ISL transmissions with Federal users through NTIA to

ensure that harmful interference does not result to Federal systems. In addition, as required

by Section 25.279(b)(1)(ii), Boeing will, at the Commission’s request, provide sufficient

information to evaluate the electromagnetic compatibility of its proposed ISLs with federal



22
  See Public Notice, Satellite Policy Branch Information, Applications Accepted for Filing,
Cut-off Established for Additional NGSO-Like Satellite Applications or Petitions for
Operations in the 12.75-13.25 GHz, 13.85-14.0 GHz, 18.6-18.8 GHz, 19.3-20.2 GHz, and
29.1-29.5 GHz Bands, DA 17-524, at 3 (May 26, 2917) (explaining that “we have made no
determination as to whether a processing round will be initiated” regarding Audacy’s
request for ISL frequencies in bands including the 65-71 GHz band).


                                           13


government users of the 65-71 GHz spectrum in order to show that Boeing’s ISL

transmissions will not cause harmful interference to authorized federal government users,

based upon existing system information provided by the government. 23




23
     47 C.F.R. § 25.279(b)(1)(ii).

                                         14



Document Created: 2018-01-31 09:33:55
Document Modified: 2018-01-31 09:33:55

© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC