Attachment petition

This document pretains to SAT-AMD-20040928-00192 for Amended Filing on a Satellite Space Stations filing.

IBFS_SATAMD2004092800192_442425

                                                                             ORiGlNAL
                                            Before the                             RECEIVED
                                 Federal Communications Commission
                                       Washington, D.C. 20554                        JUN 2 2 2005
In the Matter of                                                               Federal Communicatlons Commlssion
                                                                                        M i c e of S e c r W

Mobile Satellite Ventures Subsidiary LLC               )   File No. SAT-LOA-19980702-00066
                                                       )   File No. SAT-AMD-20001214-00171
Application for Authority to Launch and                )   File No. SAT-AMD-200 10302-00019
Operate an L-band Mobile Satellite Service             )   File No. SAT-AMD-2003 1118-00335
Satellite at 101” W.L.                                 )   File No. SAT-AMD-20040209- 014
                                                       )   File No. SAT-AMD-20040928-       8m@ived
                      Petition for Clarification or Partial Reconsideration                JUN 2 8 2005
         Mobile Satellite Ventures Subsidiary LLC (“MSV”) hereby files this Petitimkr
                                                                                    O b ‘ Brmch
                                                                                            ~    A


                                                                                                a h a 1D     U     ~   ~

Clarification or Partial Reconsideration of the International Bureau’s (“Bureau”) decision

granting MSV a license for a next-generation L-band Mobile Satellite Service (“MSS”) satellite

at 101”W (“MSV-l”).’ The Bureau’s grant is an important step in MSV’s development of a

next-generation MSS system that will offer new and innovative services and that will far exceed

the capabilities of current-generation MSS systems.2 To ensure that MSV has the regulatory

certainty and flexibility needed to fulfill this vision, the Bureau should clarify that the rule
~~




     1
  See Mobile Satellite Ventures Subsidiary LLC, Order and Authorization, DA 05-1492 (May 23,
2005) (“Decision”). In its application as originally filed in 1998, MSV applied to operate MSV-
1 using up to 14 MHz (x2) of U.S.-coordinated L-band spectrum, consistent with the license for
AMSC-1 at the time. See MSV, Application, File No. SAT-LOA-19980702-00066 (July 2,
1998), at 9. Subsequently, in February 2002, the Commission modified the license for AMSC- 1
by limiting it to 10 MHz (x2) of U.S.-coordinated L-band spectrum. See Upper and Lower L-
band, Order, IB Docket No. 96-132 (2002). In September 2002, MSV filed a Petition for
Reconsideration of this decision, which is pending. See MSV, Petition for Clarification and
Partial Reconsideration, IB Docket No. 96-132 (September 6,2002). In its decision granting the
MSV-1 license, the Bureau limited MSV-1 to operate using up to 10 MHz (x2) of U.S-
coordinated L-band spectrum and failed to mention MSV’s pending petition for reconsideration
of the February 2002 decision. Decision at 7 14. MSV assumes that this was an oversight and
that MSV-1, as a replacement for AMSC-1, will be permitted to operate on the full amount of
spectrum for which AMSC-1 is permitted to operate.
  On June 17,2005, MSV posted a $3 million bond for this satellite as required by the
 Commission’s rules. See Letter from Jennifer A. Manner, Vice President, MSV, to Ms. Marlene
 H. Dortch, FCC, File No. SAT-LOA-19980702-00066 et a1 (June 17,2005).


                                                   1


requiring Fixed Satellite Service ("FSS") satellites to operate with a zt0.05" East-West station-

keeping box does not apply to MSS satellites such as MSV-1 and, accordingly, MSV is

permitted to operate MSV- 1 with a %O. 1" East-West station-keeping box subject to coordination

with other operators at 101"W.' To the extent that the Bureau deems this request to be for

reconsideration rather than clarification, MSV asks that the Bureau treat it as such and reconsider

its decision consistent with the views expressed herein.

                                             Discussion

I.     The Bureau Should Clarify that MSV May Operate Its Satellite With a Wider
       Station-Keeping Box

       In MSV's application, as amended in February 2004, MSV stated that it would operate

MSV- 1 with a zt0. 1" East-West station-keeping           At the time this application was filed, the

Commission was considering a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking proposing to apply to MSS

satellites the rule requiring FSS satellites to operate with a h0.05" East-West station-keeping

      MSV accordingly requested a waiver of this rule only to the extent that the Commission

were to amend the rule to apply to MSS satellites. See MSVFebruary 2004 Amendment at 6,

Technical Appendix at 16-17.5 In June 2004, the Commission adopted a decision in which it



  See MSV, Amendment, File No. SAT-AMD-20040209-00014 (filed February 9,2004), at 16
("MS V February 2004 Amendment").
4
 See Mitigation of Orbital Debris, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, IB Docket No. 02-54, FCC
02-80 (March 18,2002).
  MSV's application was opposed by DIRECTV, Inc. and a group of FSS operators that claimed
that operation of MSV-1 with a wider station-keepingbox than other satellites at 101"W would
make it more difficult to collocate satellites at this orbital location. See Comments of
DIRECTV, Inc., File No. SAT-AMD-20040928-00192 (November 8,2004); Opposition of
PanAmSat Corporation, Intelsat LLC, SES Americom, Inc., File No. SAT-AMD-20040928-
00192 (November 8,2004). In response, MSV noted that it did not require a waiver of any
Commission rule to operate its MSS satellite with a ztO.1" East-West station-keeping box and
that, in any case, the unique mass of its satellite and the significant solar pressure on the satellite
necessitated a wider station keeping box than other satellites. See MSV, Response, File No.

                                                   2


refrained from imposing a zt0.05" East-West station-keeping box on MSS satellites.6 As such,

there is no rule requiring MSS satellites to operate with a h0.05" East-West station-keeping box.

In its decision granting a license for MSV- 1, however, the Bureau held incorrectly that MSV
requires a waiver of Section 25.210(j) of the Commission's rules (which mandates a *0.05" East-

West station-keeping box only for FSS satellites) in order to operate MSV- 1 with a *O. l o East-

West station-keeping box. Decision at 7 2 1. The Bureau should clarify that MSV does not

require a waiver of any Commission rule in order to operate MSV-1 with a kO.1O East-West

station-keeping box and that MSV can operate MSV-1 with this wider station-keeping box

subject to coordination with other operators at 101OW.

                                           Conclusion

         MSV requests that the Bureau act consistently with the views expressed herein.

                                     Respectfully submitted,



                                                     L

    Bruce D. Jacobs                                  Jennifer A. Manner
    David S. Konczal                                 Vice President, Regulatory
    PILLSBURY WINTHROP                               MOBILE SATELLITE VENTURES
           SHAW PITTMAN LLP                           SUBSIDIARY LLC
    2300 N Street, NW                                10802 Parkridge Boulevard
    Washington, DC 20037-1 128                       Reston, Virginia 20 191
    (202) 663-8000                                   (703) 390-2700


Dated: June 22,2005


SAT-AMD-20040928-00192 (January 10,2005)' at 3-4 and Technical Appendix ("MSY
Response to DIRECTV et al").
6
    See Mitigation of Orbital Debris, Second Report and Order, IB Docket No. 02-54, FCC 04- 130
(June 21,2004), at 7 44. MSV notes that all MSS satellites include an FSS payload for feeder
link operations. The fact that the Commission specifically refrained from imposing a h0.05"
East-West station-keeping box on MSS satellites must necessarily include both the MSS and FSS
payloads.


                                                 3


                                CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

       I, Sylvia A. Davis, a secretary with the law firm of Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman
LLP, hereby certify that on this 22nd day of June 2005, served a true copy of the foregoing by
first-class United States mail, postage prepaid, upon the following:


Thomas Tycz*                                      Cassandra Thomas*
International Bureau                              International Bureau
Federal Communications Commission                 Federal Communications Commission
445 12'~Street, S.W.                              445 12* Street, S.W.
Washington, DC 20554                              Washington, DC 20554

Fern Jarmulnek*                                   Robert Nelson*
International Bureau                              International Bureau
Federal Communications Commission                 Federal Communications Commission
445 1 2 ' ~Street, S.W.                           445 1 2 ' ~Street, S.W.
Washington, DC 20554                              Washington, DC 20554

Steve Spaeth*                                      William M. Wiltshire
International Bureau                               Michael D. Nilsson
Federal Communications C o d ssion                 Harris, Wiltshire & Grannis LLP
445 1 2 ' ~Street, S.W.                            1200 Eighteenth Street, N.W.
Washington, DC 20554                               Washington, D.C. 20036

James Buttenvorth                                  Kalpak Gude
Senior Vice President                              Vice President & Associate General Counsel
DIRECTV, Inc.                                      PanAmSat Corporation
2230 E. Imperial Highway                           1801 K Street, N.W., Suite 440
El Segundo, CA 90245                               Washington, DC 20006

Humberto Henriques                                 Nancy J. Eskenazi
Director, Telecomm Policy and Regulations          Vice President & Associate General Counsel
INTELSAT LLC                                       SES Americom, Inc.
3400 International Drive, N.W.                     Four Research Way
Washington, DC 20008                               Princeton, NJ 08540

Pantelis Michalopoulos
Steptoe & Johnson LLP
1330 Connecticut Avenue N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20036

Counsel for EchoStar Satellite LLC




*By hand delivery




                                                 1



Document Created: 2005-07-05 13:24:12
Document Modified: 2005-07-05 13:24:12

© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC