Attachment dismiss

dismiss

DECISION submitted by FCC,IB

dismiss

2004-05-18

This document pretains to SAT-AMD-20040322-00057 for Amended Filing on a Satellite Space Stations filing.

IBFS_SATAMD2004032200057_373357

                                Federal Communications Commission
                                      Washington, DC 20554
International Bureau


                                                                                         DA 04-1386
                                                  May 18,2004


  Mr. David M. Drucker
  Manager, contactMEO Communications, LLC
  2539 N. Highway 67
  Sedalia, CO 80135

                                    Re:      contactMEO Communications, LLC, Application for Authority
                                             to Launch and Operate a Non-Geostationary Orbit Fixed-
                                             Satellite System in the Ka-band, File No. SAT-AMD-20040322-
                                             00057, amending File No. SAT-LOA-19971222-00222 (Call
                                             Sign 2346).

  Dear Mr. Drucker:

           This letter refers to the above referenced application, as amended, filed by contactMEO
  Communications, LLC (“contactME0’) to operate a non-geostationary satellite, fixed-satellite service
  (NGSO FSS) system in the Ka-band. contactMEO proposes to operate a system using three NGSO
  highly-elliptical orbit (HEO) satellites in combination with four geostationary satellite orbit (GSO FSS)
  satellites using NGSO FSS Ka-band spectrum.’ As set forth below, we dismiss the amended application,
  without prejudice, as defective.

           The Commission requires all applications for space station licenses to be substantially complete
  when they are filed. The Commission’s Part 25 rules set forth various information requirements that
  applicants must provide in their space station applications. Applications that are not substantially
  complete are dismissed without further processing.2 We dismiss contactMEO’s application on two
  grounds. First, the NGSO portion of the application does not comply with Section 25.145(~)(3)of the
  Commission’s rules.3 The orbital debris mitigation plan submitted by contactMEO states that its HE0
  satellites “will have their perigee altitude lowered to less than 250 km such that the satellite will re-enter
  the atmosphere in less than 25 years.’A Under Section 25.145(~)(3)of our rules, each non-geostationary
  satellite orbit applicant must “submit a casualty risk assessment if planned post-mission disposal involves
  atmospheric re-entry of the spacecraft.”’ Because the orbital debris mitigation plan for contactMEO’s
  HE0 satellites include re-entry into the atmosphere, contactMEO was required to submit a casualty risk
  assessment plan. Failure to do so renders the application as defective under Section 25.1 12(a)(1) of the
  Commission’s rules.

   ‘
   contactMEO proposes to use, on a primary or secondary basis as discussed below, the 28.6-29.1 GHz and 29.5-
  30.0 GHz bands for its H E 0 uplink operations, and the 18.8-19.3 GHz and 19.7-20.2 GHz bands for its HE0
  downlink operations. contactMEO also proposes to use the 28.6-29.1GHz band for its GSO FSS uplink operations,
  and the 18.8-19.3 GHz band for its GSO FSS downllnk operations, both on a secondary basis. contactMEO
  Amended Application, p. 3.
  ’ 47 C.F.R. 9 25.1 12.
    47 C.F.R. 9 25.145(~)(3).
  4
    contactMEO application, Exhibit, FCC Form 3 12.
    47 C.F.R. 0 25.145(~)(3).


         Second, the Commission's two-degree spacing policy for GSO satellites applies to space stations
in the Ka-band. Section 25.140(b)(2)of the Commission's rules requires an interference analysis
demonstrating that the proposed GSO FSS satellite system will be compatible with the Commission's
two-degree orbital spacing environment.6 This analysis shows the potential for interference into and from
carriers of adjacent satellites spaced two-degrees away from the proposed satellite. The International
Bureau recently released a public notice clarifying the types of showings that must be provided, and
stated that applications filed after December 3, 2003 that do not contain this analysis will be dismissed as
incomplete.' Therefore, contactMEO should have submitted an interference analysis with its March 2004
amended application. Because this information was not provided, contactMEO's application is defective.

         We also note, however, that contactMEO proposes to operate its GSO FSS satellites using NGSO
FSS spectrum, on a secondary, non-harmful interference basis to other NGSO satellite systems.
contactMEO's proposed uplink band, 28.6-29.1 GHz, is designated to NGSO FSS on a primary basis, and
GSO FSS on a secondary basis.* In considering requests to operate on a secondary basis, the
Commission has always required applicants to demonstrate that their proposed secondary operations are
not likely to cause interference to primary operations. contactME0 did not submit any technical showing
demonstrating that its proposed GSO FSS satellites can operate compatibly with other NGSO FSS
systems.

         contactMEO requested a waiver to operate GSO FSS satellites in the 18.8-19.3 GHz band. This
spectrum is designated for NGSO FSS use only. A request to waive this rule and operate GSO satellites
in this spectrum must, among other things, show that the proposed use would not undermine the policy
objective of the rule in question, which establishes a dedicated band for NGSO FSS use on a primary
basis to encourage the development of such systems. contactMEO did not submit such showings. To
date, no GSO applicant has demonstrated that it can operate on a non-harmful interference basis to NGSO
operations and, consequently, the Commission has not authorized GSO FSS operations in spectrum
designated for NGSO FSS services.'

        Because contactMEO failed to submit information as required by the Commission's rules, and did
not request a waiver of the rules requiring it to submit this information, we find that the application, as
amended, is defective. Consequently, contactMEO Communications, LLC's application for Authority to




'7 47 C.F.R. 6 25.140(b)(2).
  Clarification of 47 C.F.R. 6 25.140(b)(2), Space Station Application Interference Analysis, Public Notice, No.
SPB-195, DA 03-3863) (Dec. 3,2003).
  Stations operating in primary services are protected from interference from stations of secondary services. Stations
operating in the secondary service cannot cause hannful interference to claim protection from harmful interference
from stations of a primary service. 47 C.F.R. 6 2.104(d).
9
  See EchoStar Satellite LLC, Applications for Authority to Construct, Launch and Operate Geostationary Satellites
in the Fixed-Satellite Service using the Ka andor Extended Ku-bands at the 83" W.L., 105" W.L., 113" W.L. and
121" W.L. Orbital Locations, Memorandum Opinion and Order, DA 04-1 167 (rel. April 29,2004), and cases cited
therein.


                                                          2


Launch and Operate a Non-Geostationary Orbit Fixed-Satellite System in the Ka-band, File No. SAT-
LOA-1997 1222-00222,as amended, File No. SAT-AMD-20040322-00057, is dismissed without
prejudice to refiling."

        This action is taken pursuant to the Commission's rules on delegated authority, 47 C.F.R.
5 0.261.


                                                               Sincerely,
                                                                 /I              rn


                                                               Thomas S. Tycz
                                                               Chief
                                                               Satellite Division




IO
   Applications returned to applicants for additional information will not require an additional fee when resubmitted,
if the resubmitted application is identical to the returned application except for the missing information. See 47
C.F.R. 5 1.1109.


                                                          3



Document Created: 2004-05-18 11:02:42
Document Modified: 2004-05-18 11:02:42

© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC