Attachment NTIA May 25 2005 ltr

This document pretains to SAT-AMD-20031118-00332 for Amended Filing on a Satellite Space Stations filing.

IBFS_SATAMD2003111800332_1172919

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Telecommunications and Information Administration Washington, D.C. 20230 MaAY 2 5 2005 Mr. Donald Abelson s2358 BAT—AMD—20031118—003232 12200 Mobile° Sateitit + PW 200300233 . Chief, International Bureau ‘* '\/'Q\‘-" atelfite Vontures Subsidiary LLC Federal Communications Commission ‘ th 445 12" Street, SW AMsc—1 sat—mobp.2003iti8—00333 1B200300233: Washington, DC 20554 . Mobile Satellite Ventures Subsidiary LLC AMSC—1 Dear Mr. Abelson: On April 15, 2005, the Federal Communications Commission (Commission) released two Public Notices listing applications for Globalstar LLC (GLLC) requesting the authority to implement an Ancillary Terrestrial Component (ATC) for the Globalstar above 1 GHz mobile satellite service (MSS) system.‘ In the applications GLLC seeks to modify its: 1) space station license for blanket authority to construct and operate an unlimited number of ATC base stations (BSs); and 2) earth station license to offer dual—mode MSS ATC mobile earth terminals (METs)." The proposed GLLC ATC BS will transmit in the 2487.5—2493 MHz band and the proposed MET‘s will transmit in the 1610—1615.5 MHz band. The National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA) has reviewed the GLLC applications and would like to provide comments on the proposed emission limits of GLLC ATC BSs and MET‘s in the radionavigation satellite service (RNSS) bands used by the Global Positioning System (GPS), the protection of radio astronomy service (RAS) operations, and the use of transportable ATC BSs." The GLLC applications describe the protection requirements ofRNSS receivers from the emissions of their ATC BSs and METs.* Specifically, under 47 C.F.R. Section 25.254(a)(4), GLLC is required to demonstrate that its ATC BSs operating in the 2487.5—2493 MHz band shall not generate an equivalent isotropically radiated power (EIRP) density of greater than —70 dBW/MHz in the 1559—1610 MHz band. The level of discrete emissions (less than 700 Hz) shall not exceed an EIRP of —80 dBW in the 1559—1610 MHz band. Similarly, under 47 C.F.R. 1. Federal Communications Commission, Public Notice, Repor No. SAT—00284 (April 15, 2005); Federal Communications Commission, Public Notice, Report No. SES—00704 (April 15, 2005). 2. Globalstar LLC Applications for Modification to Add Authority to Operate an ATC, SATMOD—20050301— 00054 (filed March 1, 2005) (GLLC ATC BS Application); Globalstar USA, LLC Application for Modification to Add Authority to Operate an ATC, SES—MOD—20050301—00261 (filed March 1, 2005) (GUSA ATC MET Application}. 3. The bands 1164—1215 MHz, 1215—1300 MHz, and 1559—1610 MHz are allocated to RNSS. GPS operates in the 1574.397—1576.433 MHz, 1164—1188 MHz, and 1215—1240 MHz portions of the RNSS bands. 4. GLLC ATC BS Application, at Exhibit B—6; GUSA ATC MET Applications, at Exhibit B—6.

Section 25.254(b)(4), GLLC is required to demonstrate that its ATC MET‘s (in addition to its . MSS METs) operating in the 1610—1615.5 MHz band shall notgenerate an EIRP density greater than —70 dB W/MHz in the 1559—1605 MHz band or greater than a level determined by linear interpolation in the 1605—1610 MHz band from —70 dBW/MHz at 1605 MHz to —10 dBW/MHz at 1610 MHz. The level of discrete emissions (less than 700 Hz) shall not exceed an EIRP of —80 dBW in the 1559—1605 MHz band or exceed a level determined by linear interpolation from —80 dBW at 1605 MHz to —20 dBW at 1610 MHz. In the MSS ATC proceeding, the Commission decided that ATC BSs and MET‘s will operate in compliance with the same limits on emissions in the 1559—1610 MHz band that were adopted for MSS MET‘s in the Global Mobile Personal Communications by Satellite (GMPCS) proceeding." The NTIA comments in the MSS ATC rulemaking proceeding identified several problems associated with using the GMPCS emission limits for ATC BSs and METs. First, the EIRP limit of —70 dBW/MHz for GMPCS terminals was based on the protection of aviation GPS receivers used for precision approaches. Many of the factors considered in the analysis of aviation receivers do not apply to GPS receivers used in terrestrial applications." Second, the type of GPS receiver used in the development of the GMPCS emission limits was based on a conventional coarse/acquisition (C/A) code architecture. However, the use of assisted—GPS receiver technology has emerged as a critical terrestrial application that can be more sensitive to interference compared to a C/A code receiver, particularly in urban areas where the GPS received signals could be degraded and ATC use is likely to be higher.‘ Finally, the —70 dBW/MHz was a compromise reached between the aviation and MSS communities, driven by the limitations on the filters that could be practically implemented in GMPCS MET‘s to reduce the levels of emissions in the 1559—1610 MHz band. Since the ATC MET‘s will operate at lower power levels than MSS or GMPCS MET‘s, it should be possible to reduce the emissions in the RNSS frequency bands without significantly impacting ATC operations. In the MSS ATC Report and Order (R&O), Mobile Satellite Ventures (MSV), an L—Band MSS ATC provider, and the GPS Industry Council (IC) reached an agreement in which MSV 5. See Flexibilityfor Delivery ofCommunications by Mobile Satellite Service Providers in the 2 GHz Band, the L— Band, and the 1.6/2.4 GHz Bands; Review ofthe Specirum Sharing Plan Among Non—Geostationary Satellite Orbit Mobile Satellite Service Systems in the 1.6/2.4 GHz Bands, IB Docket No. 01—185 and 02—364, Report and Order and Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, FCC 03—15, 18 FCC Red 1962, at 2028—29, {€ 124—126; 2051—53,«0 180—184 (2003), (MSS Flexibility R&O). . 6. For example, GPS terrestrial receivers do not have the protection provided to the GPS aviation receive antenna that is mounted on top of the aircraft, and thus is shielded to some extent from the mobile METs below the aircraft. Terrestrial GPS receivers operate under handicaps such as signal attenuation due to destructive multipath, folage, or building shadowing. It is also possible that the separation distance between a MET and a GPS terrestrial receiver can be much less than the 100 feet used in the aviation receiver analysis. 7. Assisted—GPS describes a system where outside sources, such as an assistance server and reference network, help a GPS receiver perform tasks required to make range measurements and position solutions. AssistedGPS modules for applications in cell phones can detect signals at—182 dBW, which is 22 dB below the GPS minimum guaranteed signal level of —160 dBW.

committed to ensure that the EIRP density of emissions from its ATC BSs do not exceed —100 dBW/MHz in the 1559—1610 MHz band and the EIRP of discrete ATC BS emissions do not exceed —110 dBW in that band. MSV also agreed that all MET‘s accessing its ATC network would restrict the EIRP density of emissions in the 1559—1605 MHz band to —90 dBW/MHz, restrict the EIRP of discrete emissions to —100 dBW in that band, restrict the EIRP density of emissions in the 1605—1610 MHz band toa level determined by linear interpolation from —90 dBW/MHz at 1605 MHz to —66 dBW/MHz at 1610 MHz, and restrict the EIRP of discrete emissions in the 1605—1610 MHz band to a level determined by linearinterpolation, from —100 dBW at 1605 MHz to —76 dBW at 1610 MHz. Further, MSV agreed that all new MET‘s placed in service more than five years after it commences ATC operation would restrict the EIRP density of emissions to —95 dBW/MHz in the 1559—1605 MHz band, restrict the EIRP of discrete emissions to —105 dBW in that band, restrict in the 1605—1610 MHz band to a level determined by linear interpolation from —95 dBW/MHz at 1605 MHz to —71 dBW/MHz at 1610 MHz, and restrict the EIRP of discrete emissions to a level determined by linear interpolation from —105 dBW at 1605 MHz to—81 dBW at 1610 MHz.° These EIRP limits apply to ATC BSs and METs that employ either Time Division Multiple Access (TDMA) or Code Division Multiple Access (CDMA). | NTIA performed an analysis proposing out—of—band emission levels that were consistent with those agreed to by MSV and the GPS IC." NTIA also performed an analysis to determine the effect that various EIRP limits would have on the ability of a GPS receiver to meet the Commission‘s Enhanced 911 performance accuracy requirement of 150 meters with 95 percent availability. The analysis showed that at an EIRP of—70 dBW/MHz there would be a significant degradation in performance availability. However, at the EIRP levels agreed by MSV and the GPS IC, the performance availability would be high."" The Commission declined to adopt the more stringent emission limits endorsed by NTIA, GPS IC, and MSV because they believed that there was not a sufficient basis in the public record to support adoption of the stricter emission limits."" The GPS IC has also filed a petition for reconsideration requesting that the more 8. See Mobile Satellite Ventures Subsidiary LLC Applicationfor Minor Modifications ofSpace Station Licensefor AMSC—1; Minor Amendment to Applicationfor Authority to Launch and Operate a Next—Generation Replacement MSS Satellite, Applicationfor Minor Modification ofBlanket Licensefor Authority to Operate Mobile Earth Terminals with MSAT—1, Files Nos. SAT—MOD—20031118—00333, SAT—AMD—2003—1118—00332, SES—MOD— 20031118—01879, Order and Authorization, DA 04—3553 (released November 8, 2004). 9. Letter from Fredrick R. Wentland, Acting Associate Administrator, Office of Spectrum Management, National Telecommunications and Information Administration to Donald Abelson, Chief, International Bureau, Fedeal Communications Commission (November 12, 2002). 10. Letter from Fredrick R. Wentland, Acting Associate Administrator, Office of Spectrum Management, National Telecommunications and Information Administration to Edmond Thomas, Chief, Office of Engineerig and Technology, Federal Communications Commission (January 24, 2003). 11. See Flexibilityfor Delivery ofCommunications by Mobile Satellite Service Providers in the 2 GHz Band, the L— Band, and the 1.6/2.4 GHz Bands, IB Docket No. 01—185, Memorandum Opinion and Order and Second Order on Reconsideration, FCC 05—30, at [ 69 (April 13, 2005), (MSS Flexibility MO&O). 3

stringent emission limits be adopted for MSS ATC BSs and MET‘s, but the Commission has not acted on it at this time."" On December 8, 2004, President Bush authorized a new national poli¢y that establishes guldance and implementation actions for space—based positioning, navigation, and timing (PNT) programs, augmentations, and activities for U.S. national and homeland security, civil, scientific, and commercial purposes." The PNT policy directs the Secretary of Commerce to protect the radio frequency spectrum used by GPS and its augmentations through appropriate domestic and international spectrum management regulatory practices.‘* The PNT policyfurther directs the Secretary of Commerce, in cooperation with the Chairman of the Commission to take the appropriate and legally permissible actions required to mitigate interference to GPS."" The President‘s PNT policy also calls for the establishment of an inter—agency Executive Committee, on which the Chairman of the Commission is invited to participate as a liaison, and a National Space—Based PNT Coordination Office.‘" The MSS ATC Memorandum Opinion and Order (MO&O) states that the Commission intends to establish discussions with other agencies, through the PNT Executive Committee and Coordination Office, to better understand what levels are necessary to protect GPS operations.‘" — Since there are inherent differences between GMPCS equipment and ATC equipment such as power (higher power for MSS MET‘s and lower power for ATC MET‘s) and deployment (low density for MSS MET versus high density for ATC METs), NTIA believes that it is appropriate to establish different emission limits for ATC MET‘s in the 1559—1610 MHz RNSS frequency band. Moreover, the applications of GPS and the technologies used to process lower received signal levels have evolved and must be taken into consideration when establishing emission limits to protect GPS operations. The analysis performed by NTIA was based in part on proposals made by MSV for its ATC implementation. However, the NTIA analysis is general in nature and can be applied to ATC MET‘s operating in the 1610—1615.5 MHz band. There has been no information provided in the public record of the MSS ATC rulemaking proceeding that would indicate the levels proposed by NTIA and the GPS IC are not achievable using existing technology. The only MSS ATC licensee, MSV, has agreed to comply with the emission limits recommended by NTIA and supported by the GPS IC, and the Commission has made compliance with those limits a condition of their license, thereby establishing current best practices for the industry. The lower emission limits are necessary to protect existing and future GPS operations 12. U.S. GPS Industry Council, Petition for Reconsideration, IB Docket No. 01—185 (June 11, 2003). 13. Sée U.S. Space—Based Positioning, Navigation, and Timing Policy, December 15, 2004, Fact Sheet, available at www.ostp.gov/html/FactSheetSPACFBASEDPOSITIONINGNAVIGATIONTIMING.pdf. 14. Id. at 9. 15. 1d. at 11. 16. 1Id. at 4. 17. MSS Flexibility MO&O, at «[ 70.

and will not restrict the deployment of GLLC‘s ATC services. Also, establishing these emission | limits in the RNSS frequency band is consistent with the PNT policy established by the President. ‘ Unlike MSV‘s ATC BSs that operate in the 1525—1559 MHz band, the GLLC ATC BSs operating in the 2487.5—2493 MHz band are separated in frequency by over 800 MHz from the RNSS frequency band used by GPS. Given this amount of frequency separation, the frequency response of typical filters, and the low radiating efficiency of the ATC BS antennas for signals in the 1559—1610 MHz range, the attenuation of the GLLC BS signals should be at a level consistent with that agreed to by MSV. Furthermore, since the ATC BSs are at fixed known locations (e.g., not unlicensed with unknown device densities and locations), the risk of potential interference is limited. Therefore, NTIA fully expects that GLLC ATC BSs will meet the —100 dBW/MHz in the 1559—1610 MHz band; NTIA is not recommending that the Commission require measurements to confirm compliance with this emission limit. However, the issue of emission limits for potential interference sources considering the difference between the operating frequency of the source and the GPS frequency bands will be addressed as part of a more detailed study to be performed under the President‘s PNT policy. In Exhibit B—6 of the GLLC applications, it is stated that ATC METs must comply with International Telecommunication Union Radio Regulation $5.372 and 47 C.F.R. Sections 25.203(e), 25.203(f), 25.213, and 25.254(b)(1) which are intended to protect RAS observations in the 1610.6—1613.8 MHz band. GLLC ATC BSs must comply with the Commission‘s radio quiet zone requirements in 47 C.F.R. Section 1.924 and Section 25.203 (e) and (f). Finally ATC MET‘s used on aircraft must adhere to the existing National Science Foundation and Globalstar coordination agreement for the 1610.6—1613.8 MHz band."* In the GLLC applications, it is also stated that their future ATC system will have the capability to avoid assigning frequencies to MET‘s in the 1610.6—1613.8 MHz band when they are located within certain distances of RAS sites listed in 47 C.F.R. Section 25.213(a)(1)(i) and (ii). NTIA recommends that the requirements to protect RAS operations should be included in the authorization for GLLC to implement ATC service. The GLLC ATC BS application describes a transportable ATC BS that can be used to provide communication services to customers in areas that are currently unserved or underserved by existing wireline and wireless service providers.19 In the MSS ATC R&O, the Commission explained that the purpose of ATC is to extend the communications services of the MSS systems to urban areas and in buildings where the satellite signals are attenuated."" Outside ofthe urban _ areas the satellite component of the MSS ATC system is to be used. Globalstar‘s proposal for a 18. Technical Operational Coordination Agreementfor the Joint Usage ofthe Band 1610.6—1613.8 MHz Between the National Science Foundation and Globalstarfor Airborne Mobile Earth Stations Operating in its MSS Network (November 29, 2001). 19. GLLC ATC BS Application, Exhibit A at 4. 20. MSS Flexibility R&O, at { 14.

transportable ATC BS seems to be in conflict with the Commission‘s intention for the MSS ATC. However, NTIA believes that the transportable ATC BSs could provide an important communications capability during emergency situations. Therefore, NTIA recommends that the Commission limit the use of transportable ATC BSs to federal and non—federal public safety entities. The MSS ATC MO&O states that if additional ATC applications are filed, the Commission will coordinate any ATC authority grant with NTIA, pursuant to the general notification process to assure that GPS operations are adequately protected.*‘ We therefore strongly recommend that the Commission limit the EIRP density, in the 1559—1605 MHz band, from the GLLC MSS ATC MET‘s to —90 dBW/MHz (and eventually —95 dBW/MHz) and limit the EIRP density in the 1605—1610 MHz band to a level determined by linear interpolation from —90 dBW/MHz (—95 dBW/MHz) at 1605 MHz to —42 dBW/MHz (—47 dBW/MHz) at 1610 MHz." Unless these emission levels are met, the Commission should delay acting on the GLLC MSS ATC MET application until the issue concerning protection of GPS is resolved via follow— up work to the President‘s directive to protect GPS. We also recommend that the requirements to protect RAS operations should be included in the authorization for GLLC to implement ATC service and that the use of transportable ATC BSs be limited to federal and non—federal public safety entities. If you have any questions about our recommendations, please feel free to contact me at 202—482—1850. Sincerely, AA»Tow Fredrick R. Wentland Associate Administrator Office of Spectrum Management 21. Id. at 71. 22. 47 C.F.R. Section 25.254(b)(3) specifies that the ATC METs must meet an out—of—channel EIRP limit of—57.1 dBW/30 kHz (—41.87 dBW/MHz) at the edge of the licensed MSS frequency assignment. 6

REC Before the El VED FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION MaAYy 1 6 2005 Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of g FederalCommunica Office of sgg"msh?yflmmlsshn MSS Systems at 1.6/2.4 GHz p IB Docket Q2—364 ) DOCKET Informal Objection to the Globalstar FILE Chpy ORIGIMAIplication for MSS ATC, ) E970381 To: The Commission Informal Objection of the Society of Broadcast Engineers, inc. The Society of Broadcast Engineers, Incorporated (SBE), the national association of broadcast engineers and technical communications professionals, with more than 5,000 members world wide, hereby respectfully submits its Informal Objection to the March 1, 2005, application of Globalstar USA, LLC (Globalstar) for Mobile Satellite Service (MSS) Ancillary Terrestrial Component (ATC) stations, E970381. 1. MSS ATC is Mutually Exclusive with TV BAS Channel A10 Operations 1. In IB Dockets 01—185 and 02—364, the Commission assigned 2,487.5—2,493 MHz to MSS for ATC, to supplement coverage problems that MSS handsets have in "urban canyons" and high rise buildings. However, these frequencies are co—channel with grandfathered TV Broadcast Auxiliary Services (BAS) Channel A10 (2,483.5—2,500 MHz).! Because of this obvious allocation 1 All TV BAS licensees with Channel A1O authority as of July 25, 1985, were granted indefinite "grandfather" rights on a co—equal basis, by the July 25, 1985, General Docket 84—689 R&O. These grandfather rights were re—affirmed in the July 16, 2004, ET Docket 00—258 Fourth R&O, and is further documented in non— government footnote 147, as follows: NON—FEDERAL GOVERNMENT (NG) FOOTNOTES Hpoe ts o NG147 In the band 2483.5—2500 MHz, stations in the fixed and mobile services that are licensed under Part 74 (Television Broadcast Auxiliary Stations), Part 90 (Private Land Mobile Radio Services), or Part 101 (Fixed Microwave Services) of the Commission‘s Rules, which were licensed as of July 25, 1985, and those whose initial applications were filed on or before July 25, 1985, may continue to operate on a primary basis with the mobile—satellite and radiodetermination satellite services, and in the segment 2495—2500 MHz, these grandfathered stations may also continue to operate on a primary basis with stations in the fixed and mobile except acronautical mobile services that are licensed under Part 27 (Miscellaneous Wirsless Communication Services) of the Commission‘s Rules. bio. of Coning roati_fid Z List ABCOE 050312.2 SBE PAGE 1 ba m

SBE Informal Objection to the Globalstar MSS ATC Application (E970381) conflict, on September 8, 2004, SBE filed its Petition for Reconsideration of the IB Docket 02—364 Report and Order (R&O), pointing out the mutually exclusive nature of MSS ATC and TV BAS Channel A1O operations. That SBE filing proposed re—farming the three 2.5—GHz TV BAS Channels, A8 (2,450—2,467 MHz), A9 (2,467—2,483.5 MHz) and A10 to 12—MHz wide digital channels, occupying 2,450—2,486 MHz, and thus eliminating the spectrum overlap with MSS ATC. See the attached Figure 1, from the SBE Petition for Reconsideration. 2. The SBE 2.5 GHz TV BAS band plan was subsequently refined, in a November 19, 2004, IB Docket 02—364 ex parte filing, to address concerns by Nextel Corporation that the SBE proposal not delay the refarming of the 2 GHz TV BAS band, a necessary component of solving the public safety interference problem in the 800 MHz Specialized Mobile Radio {SMR) band (WT Docket 02—55). See the attached Figure 2, from the SBE ex parte filing. 3. In ET Docket 95—18 (MSS), the Commission concluded that TV BAS operations and MSS operations were mutually exclusive uses of the same spectrum. In ET Docket 00—258 {Advanced Wireless Services (AWS), aka Third Generation (3G) Wireless Services), the Commission similarly concluded that TV BAS operations and high—density cellular commercial mobile radio services (CMRS) operations were also mutually exclusive uses of the same spectrum. It is for these reasons that the 2 GHz TV BAS band is in the process of being refarmed, from 1,990—2,110 MHz, to 2,025—2,1 10 MHz, representing a loss of 35 MHz of 2 GHz TV BAS spectrum (presently TV BAS Channels A1 (1,990—2,008 MHz) and A2 (2,008—2,025 MHz)). 4. Thus, the proposed construction of MSS ATC in the ten largest U.S. cities, and Washington, D.C., is simply premature and mutually exclusive with the existing, indefinitely grandfathered, co— equal use of that spectrum by TV BAS Channel A1O licensees. See the attached Figure 3. The Universal Liceasing System (ULS) additionally shows Channel A10 TVPU stations in: Baton Rouge, LA Biloxi, MS Charlotte, NC Corpus Christi, TX Fort Myers, FL Fort Wayne, IN Hartford, CT Honolulu, HI Jacksonville, FL Las Vegas, NV Lawton, OK Louisville, KY Moline, IL Nashville, TN Miami, FL 050312.2 SBE PAQGE 2

SBE Informal Objection to the Globalstar MSS ATC Application (E970381) Minneapolis, MN Phoenix/Mesa, AZ Salt Lake City, UT San Diego, CA Stockton, CA Visalia, CA West Palm Beach, FL. However, Figure 3, and the above list, still understate the nature of the problem, since each TVPU. Kicense can authorize multiple mobile/itinerant transmitters. 5. Further, because of the policy establishedin ET Docket 98—142 (7 GHz MSS downlinks, sharing the 7 GHz TV BAS band), and re—affirmed in ET Docket 03—254 (Frequency Coordination Rules for 7 GHz MSS uplinks and downlinks, and 13 GHz MSS Gateway Uplinks, and Terrestrial 7 & 13 GHz TV BAS, CARS and POFS), namely that between co—equal users the first—in—time user must be protected by the newcomer user, it is clear that MSS ATC would be required to protect Channel A10 TV BAS operations. But, the primary TV Channel A10 use in the major metropolitan areas is by mobile/itinerant TV Pickup (TVPU) stations, whose location continuously varies. Although some of this grandfathered Channel A1O use is for known—in—advance, scheduled events, such as car races, golf tournaments, marathons, and large sporting events, Channel A1O also includes the coverage of un—scheduled news events. Because it would be impractical for Globalstar to simply shut down its later—in—time ATC operation when an eatlier—in—time grandfathered TVPU station needed to operate in the same area, it is clear that for at least seven of the ten largest U.S. cities, the Globalstar ATC application is grossly premature, and must not be granted until such time as grandfathered Channel A10 TV BAS operations have been moved out of 2,483.5—2,500 MHz. 1. Globalstar Application Does Not Even Acknowledge the Existence of Channel A10 TV BAS Stations! 6. Although the Globalstar application addresses how its proposed ATC would protect the Radio Astronomy Service (Exhibits B and B—5); the Radio—Navigation—Satellite/Aeronautical Radio— Navigation Services (Exhibits B and B—6); the Table Mountain Radio Receiving Zone at Boulder County, Colorado (Exhibit B); the National Radio Astronomy Observatories at Green Bank, WV and Sugar Grove, WV (Exhibit B); and all FCC Monitoring Stations (Exhibit B), no where in the application does Globalstar mention the existence of co—channel TV BAS Channel A10 operations, with their co—equal priority, and earlier—in—time status. Perhaps this is because Globalstar realized that TV BAS Channel A10 operations\ and MSS ATC are mutually exclusive, and that there can be no successful frequency coordination between fundamentally incompatible uses of the same spectrum. In any event, this failure to address a co—equal and earlier—in—time user of the spectrum 050312.2 SBE PAGE 3 = z= z> eAnvernulmmillaooilcre

SBE Informal Objection to the Globalstar MSS ATC Application (E970381) makes the Globalstar application fundamentally flawed and un—grantable until TV BAS operations have first been cleared from 2,483.5—2,500 MHz. Of course, under the ET Docket 92—9 "Emerging Technologies" policy, Globalstar is obligated to re—imburse TV BAS Channel A10, A8 and A9 licenses for their relocation costs (all three channels must be converted in order to maintain the present three—channel capability for 2.5—GHz TV BAS). Additionally, there may be Part 101 Private Operational Fixed Service (POFS) and Part 21 Local Television Transmission Service (LTTS) that will also have to be converted. ' III. Summary 7. The Globalstar application for MSS ATC authority in the top—ten U.S. cities is grossly premature and must not be granted until grandfathered operations on TV BAS Channel A1O0 have first been cleared from 2,483.5—2,500 MHz, by converting the three 2.5 GHz TV BAS channels to 12—MHz wide digital channels, and re—packing those channels to 2,450—2,486 MHz, as shown in Figure 2. This work must be properly coordinated with the 2 GHz transition being done by Nextel, Inc. and with POFS and LTTS licensees sharing the 2,450—2,483.5 MHz band. Until that work is completed, MSS ATC cannot operate in at least seven of the ten largest U.S. cities, and would further have to restrict any temporary deployment of MSS ATC to areas not near the other twenty— two cities listed in Paragraph 4 of these coramenits. 050312.2 SBE PAGE 4

SBE Informal Objection to the Globaistar MSS ATC Application (E970381) List of Figures 8. The following figures or exhibits have been prepared as a part of this SBE Informal Objection to the Globalstar E970381 application for MSS ATC: 1. 2.5 GHz TV BAS band plan from the September 8, 2004, SBE IB Docket 02—364 Petition for Reconsideration 2. Revised SBE 2.5 GHz TV BAS band plan, from the November 19, 2005, SBE ex parte filing to IB Docket 02—364 3. Channel A10 TV Pickup stations in the ten largest U.S, cittes. Respectfully submitted, Society of Broadcast Engineers, Inc. is! Ray Benedict, CPBE SBE President is! Dane E. Ericksen, P.E., CSRTE Chairman, SBE FCC Liaison Committee Is?f Christopher D. Imlay, Esq. General Counsel May 16, 2005 Booth, Freret, Imlay & Tepper 14356 Cape May Road Silver Spring, Maryland 20904 301/384—5525 v ©50312.2 SBE PAGE 5

SBE Informal Objection to the Globalstar MSS ATC Application (E970381) Originally Proposed SBE 2.5 GHz TV BAS Band Plan (From the September 8, 2004, SBE IB 02—364 Petition for Reconsideration) Existing -4»—-»——-..-1’7__—_.‘.4 ~ 165 —~ +{¢ ~16.50 ——» — A8 A9 A1O : | J 2450 2467 2483.5 2500 MHz f io 30 [ e 3o, "o 1 | 3 1 pa o d § 4 : % ob phd Ks o. { Pof g ; MA K4 1 i | : i e o2se 2ses 1200 a55» 0| 6 »-»:i‘s.sj;s.s—" Agd A9d § Aldd _0( | v ; o0 | | 1(50 | + §8§ stt §7 OB7 guw j | O NNA O o eA ! ! § ; C i | i e | ! 11 i| | | < BRSYEBS—> —% ——» 3 & C 3 t o & x d 3 5 C | i Proposed New 2.5 GHz TV Band Plan All frequencies and bandwidths are in MHz. © 2005 SBE, Inc. SociEty or BROADCAST ENGINEERS, Inc. Indianapolis, Indiana 050312 Figure 1

SBE informal Objection to the Globalstar MSS ATC Application (E970381) Revised Proposed SBE 2.5 GHz TV BAS Band Plan {From the November 19, 2004, SBE 1B 02—364 ex parte Filing) Existing 17 w—i« 16,5 ———»/« AS A9 2450 2467 2483.5 2500 MHz :.% lE‘ |__._2.25 MHz downward 3 T 1 shift in center frequency e 1J es c 1230 or—| e digital digital digital ASdl Addl A10d 1 C + oy a : m § L2 +]| MA m es 12 =——»mfé———1 2 m——12 ——w| S,5— 6 w5 5ei+5.5 | | | A8d2 Add2 A10d2 . 5o §@28 sB o A A 84 &A A 3 o o < &o & © & 3 3A c 3 3 o t a 8 8. 3 3 3 3 3 — BRS/EBS §$$90 * Proposed New 2.5 GHz TV Band Plan All frequencies and bandwidths are in MHz. © 2005 SBE, Inc. SocIETYy oF BROADCAST ENGINEERS, Inc. Indianapolis, Indiana 050312 Figure 2

SBE Informal Objection to the Globalstar MSS ATC Application (E970381) TV BAS Channel A10 TV Pickup Stations in the Top—Ten U.S. Cities Top—ten U.S. Cities* 1. New York, NY KA—41459, American Broadcasting Companies, Inc. KA—41481, American Broadcasting Companies, Inc. KB—55010, CBS Broadcasting, Inc. KK—4431, American Broadcasting Companies, Inc. KK—5793, American Broadcasting Companies, Inc. Los Angeles, CA KA—88698, NBC Telemundo License Co. KA—88699, NBC Telemundo License Co. KA—88722, NBC Telemundo License Co. KA—88729, NBC Telemundo License Co. KA—88724, NBC Telemundo License Co. KA—88725, NBC Telemundo License Co. KA—88726, NBC Telemundo License Co. KA—88887, Fox Television Stations, Inc. KA—88952, CBS Broadcasting Inc. KA—88959, KTLA Inc. KB—97260, Viacom Television Stations Group of Los Angeles KB—55380, KTLA Inc. KB—55953, NBC Telemundo License Co. Chicago, IL KB—55038, CBS Broadcasting, Inc. KQ—8499, WGN Continental Broadcasting Company Washington, DC/Baltimore, MD KK—7854, Viacom Inc. San Francisco/Oakland/San Jose, CA KA—35181, CBS Broadcasting Inc. KA—74712, CBS Broadcasting Inc. KR—9941, CBS Broadcasting Inc. KR—9943, CBS Broadcasting Inc. KV—8015, CBS Broadcasting Inc. KV—8016, CBS Broadcasting Inc. * Source: http://www.govspot.com/lists/largestcities00.htm. SOCIETY OF BROADCAST ENGINEERS, INC. 050312 Indianapolis, Indiana Figure 3A

SBE Informal Objection to the Globalstar MSS ATC Application (E970381) TV BAS Channel A10 TV Pickup Stations in the Top—Ten U.S. Cities 6. Philadelphia, PA KB—55025, CBS Broadcasting, Inc. & Boston, MA 8. Detroit, MI KA—34502, Post—Newsweek Stations, Michigan, Inc. KA—34503, Post—Newsweek Stations, Michigan, Inc. KA—74900, Post—Newsweek Stations, Michigan, Inc. KE—5967, Post—Newsweek Stations, Michigan, Inc. KE—5968, Post—Newsweek Stations, Michigan, Inc. KZ—2672, Post—Newsweek Stations, Michigan, Inc. 9. Dallas/Fort Worth, TX 10, Houston, TX SOCIETY OF BROADCAST ENGINEERS, INC. 050312 Indianapolis, Indiana Figure 3B


Document Created: 2017-02-01 15:37:17
Document Modified: 2017-02-01 15:37:17
© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC