Attachment 2002CAI Data Petitio

2002CAI Data Petitio

PETITION submitted by CAI Data

Petition for Waiver or an Extension

2002-06-26

This document pretains to SAT-AMD-19990930-00093 for Amended Filing on a Satellite Space Stations filing.

IBFS_SATAMD1999093000093_1071965

McGuireWoods LLP Washington Square 1050 Connecticut Avenue N.W. Suite 1200 Washington, DC 20036—5317 Phone: 202.857.1700 @;?/G% Fax: 202.057.1737 www.meguirewoods.com M32% B9en .L , MeGUIREWOODS June 26, 2002 RECEIVED By Hand Delive JUN 2 6 2002 Marlene H. Dortch Secretary FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Federal Communications Commission OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY 445 12th Street, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 Re: CAl Data Systems, Inc.‘s Petition for Waiver or Extension of Milestone, File Nos. ‘88—SAT—P/LA—97; 32—SAT—AMEND—98; IBFS Nos. SAT—LOA—19970702—00057; SAT— AMD—19971219—00199; SAT—AMD—19990930—00093 Dear Ms. Dortch: CAl Data Systems, Inc. ("CAI"), by its attorneys, hereby submits an original and four copies of its petition for a waiver or an extension of the milestone requirements associated with its license to operate a Ka—band satellite at the 125 degrees W.L. orbital location, file numbers 88—SAT—P/LA—97; 32—SAT—AMEND—98; IBFS numbers SAT—LOA—19970702—00057; SAT—AMD— 19971219—00199; SAT—AMD—19990930—00093. Please date—stamp and return the enclosed extra copy of this filing. Should you have any questions concerning this filing, do not hesitate to contact the undersigned. Respectfully submitted, James U. Troup Adrian B. Copiz Counsel for CAl Data Systems, Inc. Enclosures Co: attached service list

Before the RECEIVED Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 jUN 3 6 2002 s0G RAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMIS In the Matter of J eeoe orrice or THE SECRETARY ) CA Data Systems, Inc. ) File Nos. 88—SAT—P/LA—97; 32—SAT— ) AMEND—98; IBFS Nos. SAT—LOA— Application for Authority to Construct, ) 19970702—00057; SAT—AMD— Launch, and Operate a Ka—Band Satellite ) 19971219—00199; SAT—AMD— System in the Fixed—Satellite Service ) 19990930—00093 PETITION FOR WAIVER OR EXTENSION OF MILESTONE 1. Introduction Pursuant to Section 1.3 of the Federal Communications Commission‘s ("FCC" or the "Commission") rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.3, CAI Data Systems, Inc. ("CAI Data") hereby respectfully requests that the Commission grant CAI Data a waiver or an extension of its first construction milestone. The basis for the requested extension or waiver is that there is uncertainty for which orbital location CAI Data will be constructing and deploying a satellite. Additionally, Ka—band satellite systems are a nascent technology and, therefore, CAI Data requires more certainty as to the orbital location for which it will develop a satellite system so as to efficiently use its resources and effectively develop a sophisticated and competitive service. CAI Data‘s situation comprises ~ special circumstances and grant of a waiver or an extension will serve the public interest. II. Background CAI Data filed its application to launch and operate a satellite system in geostationary— satellite orbit to provide fixed—satellite services in the Ka—band on July 2, 1997.‘ As described in ! CAI Data Application, File Nos. 88—SAT—P./LA—97 and 32—SAT—AMEND—98; IBFS Nos. SAT— LOA—19970702—00057, SAT—AMD—19971219—00199, and SAT—AMD—19990930—00093 (July 2, 1997) ("CAI Data Application").

its application, CAI Data plans to provide high—quality two—way video, voice, and data services to business and residential customers throughout the United States on a non—common carrier basis. In its application, CAI Data originally requested an orbital assignment to deploy a single satellite at either 93 degrees W.L., 95 degrees W.L., or 103 degrees W.L.. These orbital locations were selected because they would ensure that satellite service could be effectively provided to the entire country using a single satellite. Orbital locations that would require CAI Data to build more than one satellite would make it significantly more costly for CAI to enter the market. Subsequent to filing its application and during the process of negotiating with other second—round applicants, CAI signed both a majority plan and an alternative plan, each providing CAI with different orbital locations. In the majority plan, as updated on November 1, 2000, it was proposed that CAI Data be assigned the 107 degrees orbital location." In the alternative plan, it was proposed that CAI be assigned the 79 degrees orbital location.* During the first round Ka—band assignments, the Commission assigned Motorola, Inc. ("Motorola") the 87 degrees orbital location." On January 9, 2001, Motorola filed an application ("Motorola‘s Application") for consent to assignment to Teledesic, LLC ("Teledesic"), of its first round licenses, which includes the 87 degrees W.L. orbital location.©" On May 7, 2001, Pegasus Development Corporation ("Pegasus"), one of the second round applicants, filed a petition to dismiss or deny Motorola‘s application on the basis that Motorola has abandoned its license, is barred from assigning it, and making Motorola‘s orbital locations available to second round 2 CAI Data Application at p. 1. 3 Letter from the majority plan signatories to Magalie Roman Salas, Secretary, FCC (November 1, 2000). * Letter from the alternative plan signatories to Magalie Roman Salas, Secretary, FCC (August 11, 2000). 5 See In the Matter of Comm, Inc. Application for Authority to Construct, Launch, and Operate a Ka—band Satellite System in the Fixed—Satellite Service, 12 FCC Red 23001 (May 9, 1997) (authorizing GSO satellites at 91 degrees W.L., 87 degrees W.L., 77 degrees W.L., and 75 degrees W.L.). 6 See Public Notice, Report No. SAT—00068 (April 6, 2001).

licensing applicants would better serve the public interest.‘ On June 4, 2001, CAI Data filed comments supporting Pegasus‘ petition to dismiss or deny. The record clearly supports denying the assignment of Motorola‘s orbital locations to Teledesic. Granting the assignment would be contrary to the Commission‘s precedent of not allowing the assignment of an abandoned license." Such an assignment would also violate the Commission‘s prohibitions against trafficking in licenses, warehousing orbit—spectrum resources, and trading in bare applications." Expecting Motorola‘s orbital locations to become available for second—round applicants, CAI Data requested that the FCC assign the 87 degrees W.L. orbital location to CAI Data." From the beginning CAI has sought a more centrally located Ka—band orbital location between 82 to 99 degrees W.L. A related company, World Satellite Network, Inc. ("WSNet"), currently provides wholesale capacity for multichannel video programming from a Ku—band satellite at 93 degrees W.L."‘ By locating CAI Data‘s Ka—band satellite near the Ku—band satellite currently being used by WSNet, CAI Data and WSNet will be able to cooperatively provide a single dish solution to companies providing multichannel video programming to consumers in rural America. The Commission, however, has not rendered a decision on Motorola‘s Application or on Pegasus‘ Petition. Rather, in the second round assignments, the Commission assigned CAI Data the 125 degrees W.L. orbital location." CAI has never contemplated using an orbital location as 7 See Pegasus‘ Petition to Dismiss, File Nos. 94 through 98—SAT—P/LA—97, 163 through 166—SAT— P/LA—95 (March 26). 8 See Application ofAmerican Telephone and Telegraph Company and Ford Aerospace Satellite Services Corporation, 2 FCC Red 4431 (1987). ° See 47 C.F.R. § 25.145(d)(2) and 47 C.F.R § 25.145(d)(3). 10 Letter from James U. Troup, Counsel for CAI Data, to Magalie Roman Salas, Secretary, FCC (June 8, 2001). M WSNet has also filed earth station applications to use Canadian DBS satellites at 82 and 91 degrees W.L. to provide services in the United States. WSNet Fixed Earth Station Application, SES—LIC— 20011121—02186 and WSNet Blanket Earth Station Application, SES—LIC—20020111—00075, Public Notice, Report No. SES—00364, February 6, 2002. 12 See In the Matter of CAI Data Systems, Inc.; Application for Authority to Construct, Launch, and Operate a Ka—band Satellite System in the Fixed—Satellite Service, 16 FCC Red 14269 (August 2, 2001) ("CAI Assignment Order").

far west as 125 degrees W.L. because its business plan, which depends on the construction of a single satellite, can not be economically implemented without a more central continental U.S. orbital location. L. THE COMMISSION SHOULD GRANT A WAIVER OR AN EXTENSION Pursuant to Section 1.3 of the Commission‘s rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.3, the Commission may, on its own motion or upon a showing of good cause, suspend or waive its rules." For a waiver to be appropriate there must be 1) special circumstances that warrant a deviation from a general rule, and 2) the deviation would better serve the public interest than would strict adherence to the general rule." CAI Data hereby requests a waiver of Section 25.145(f) of the Commission‘s rules, 47 C.F.R. § 25.145(f) and the condition placed on CAI Data‘s authority that CAI Data begin construction on a satellite one year after the grant of authority. CAI Data respectfully requests that its first milestone be extended to the earlier of one additional year or 90 days after the FCC releases a decision with respect to CAI Data‘s request to operate a single satellite at the 87 degrees W.L. orbital location. CAI Data‘s ability to meet its first milestone (entering into a non—contingent contract for constructing a Ka—band satellite to be deployed in geostationary orbit) is highly dependent on the Commission‘s rendering of a decision on Motorolla‘s application. Should the 87 degrees W.L. orbital location become available through an FCC decision and then be assigned to CAI Data after CAI Data has already begun construction on a satellite for the 125 degrees W.L. orbital location, significant loss of time and financial resources would be experienced by CAI Data in converting its resources to constructing a satellite for the 87 degrees W.L. orbital location. Furthermore, because Ka—band satellite technology is still in its early stages of development, it is 13 See also WAIT Radio v. Federal Communications Commission, 418 F.2d 1153 (D.C. Cir. 1969); Northeast Cellular Radio Telephone Co. v. Federal Communications Commission, 897 F.2d4 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990) ("Northeast Cellular"). 14 See In the Matter ofNetSat 28 Company, L.L.C.; for Authority to Construct, Launch, and Operate a Ka—Band Communications Satellite in the Fixed—Satellite Service in Orbital Location 95 Degrees W.L., 16 FCC Red 11025 (released May 25, 2001); Northeast Cellular, 897 F.2d at 1166.

particularly important that CAI Data be able to develop its satellite within a framework of certainty as to which orbital location will be used for the satellite system. CAI Data, through no choice of its own and under circumstances beyond its control, is in a unique situation that comprises special circumstances. If the Commission assigns CAI Data the use of the 87 degrees W.L. orbital location in the next few days, CAI Data believes that it will be able to satisfy the first construction milestone and this extension request will be rendered moot. CAI Data is submitting this extension request in an abundance of caution in the event the Commission‘s decision on the 87 degrees W.L orbital location assignment is not issued until after the deadline for the first construction milestone. The Commission has previously granted an extension due to the necessity of reconfiguring and redesigning a proposed system."" By granting an extension at this time, the Commission can avoid any extension of the second milestone that might be required for redesigning the satellite system should the 87 degrees W.L. orbital location become available to CAI Data. The Commission must reach a decision soon on the assignment of the 87 degrees W.L. orbital location to protect the date priority of the U.S. to that orbital location. The Commission has far less flexibility in granting an extension for the second milestone. As discussed by the Commission in its order assigning the 125 degrees W.L. orbital location to CAI Data, the second milestone is slightly over one year shorter than is normally provided to Ka—band assignees so as to protect the date priority of the U.S. ITU filing for 125 degrees W.L.‘* If CAI Data is granted an extension of the first milestone, it will not seek any kind of extension of the launch and operate milestone of June 25, 2005. Under these special circumstances it is reasonable, appropriate, and in the public interest for the Commission to take advantage of the flexibility it now has to extend CAI Data‘s first construction milestone. 15 See Re Application and Request ofDominion Video Satellite, Inc., for an Extension of its Direct Broadcast Satellite Permit andfor Assignment of Orbital Positions and Channels, 8 FCC Red 6680 (released September 13, 1993). 16 CAI Assignment Order at 21.

Deviation from the one—year construction milestone would better serve the public interest than would strict adherence to the general rule. By tolling the first construction milestone, the anti—warehousing purpose of the milestone rules would not be frustrated."" CAI Data will not be seeking any kind of extension of the launch and operate milestone and plans on meeting that deadline so that a satellite is providing service as scheduled, whether it be at 125 degrees W.L. or the preferred orbital location of 87 degrees W.L. Furthermore, the public interest will be better served by ensuring that a new market entrant, CAI Data, is able to efficiently develop, construct, and implement its satellite system in the emerging Ka—band and provide American customers with a choice of innovative satellite services that are competitive with the incumbent satellite providers. On the other hand, it would go against the public interest to not waive or extend CAI Data‘s first milestone, as this would exclude from the market the new and innovative high—speed, advanced services that CAI Data is seeking to offer at affordable prices and that the public wants. Rather than cancel CAI Data‘s Ka—band license, the public interest would be far better served by giving CAI Data the opportunity to construct a satellite that would operate at the 87 degrees W.L. orbital location. This orbital location would allow for the implementation of CAI Data‘s original business plan, which in turn would result in a new market entrant and ensure that the U.S. date priority for that orbital location is preserved. By contrast, assigning that orbital location to Teledesic would provide no public benefit as Teledesic has already been assigned numerous Ka—band orbital locations. 17 Assigning the 87 degrees W.L. orbital location to Teledesic LLC, by contrast, would put numerous Ka—band orbital locations under the control of a single entity.

IV. Conclusion For the foregoing reasons, as there are special circumstances beyond the control of CAI Data and as the public interest will be served, CAI Data respectfully requests that the Commission waive or extend the first construction commencement milestone associated with the CAI Data license to operate a Ka—band satellite at the 125 degrees W.L. orbital location. Respectfully submitted, ames U. Troup /’/fl Adrian B. Copiz McGuireWoods LLP Washington Square 1050 Connecticut Avenue, N.W. Suite 1200 Washington, D.C. 20036—5317 Tel: 202—857—1700 Fax: 202—857—1737 Counsel for CAI Data Systems, Inc. Date: June 26, 2002

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Linda Neilson, hereby certify that on this 26th day of June, 2002, a true and correct copy of the foregoing Petition for Waiver or Extension of Milestone was hereby either delivered by hand (*) or sent by first—class mail, postage prepaid, to the following: Don Abelson* Philip L. Malet Chief, International Bureau Steptoe & Johnson LLP Federal Communications Commission 1330 Connecticut Avenue, NW. 445 Twelfth Street, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20036 Washington, D.C. 20554 Counselfor Motorola, Inc. Jennifer Gilsenan* Brian D. Weimer Satellite Policy Branch Skadden Arps Slate Meagher & Flom LLP International Bureau 1440 New York Avenue Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20005 445 Twelfth Street, S.W. Counselfor Celsat America, Inc. Washington, D.C. 20554 Alyssa Roberts* Todd M. Stansbury Satellite Policy Branch Wiley, Rein & Fielding International Bureau 1776 K Street, N.W. Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20006 445 Twelfth Street, S.W. Counselfor DirectCom Networks, Inc. Washington, D.C. 20554 Mark A. Grannis Tara K. Giunta Kelly S. McGinn Coudert Brothers Harris, Wiltshire & Grannis LLP 1627 I Street, N.W., Suite 1200 1200 Eighteenth Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20006 Washington, D.C. 20036 Counselfor Pacific Century Group, Inc. Counselfor Teledesic LLC Bruce D. Jacobs Norman P. Leventhal Kathryn R. Schmeltzer Stephen D. Baruch Tony Lin David S. Kier Shaw Pittman LLP Philip A. Bonomo 2300 N Street, NW. Leventhal, Senter & Lerman P.L.L.C. Washington, D.C. 20037—1128 2000 K Street, NW., Suite 600 Counselfor Pegasus Development Washington, D.C. 20006 Corporation Counselfor TRW Inc. Leo Mondale Gary M. Epstein President John P. Janka @Contact LLC Latham & Watkins 1233 20th Street, NW. 555 Eleventh Street, NW. Washington, D.C. 20036 Washington, D.C. 20004 Counselfor Hughes Communications, Inc.

Raymond Bender Stephen E. Coran Dow, Lohnes & Albertson, PLLC Rini, Coran & Lancellotta 1200 New Hampshire Avenue, N.W. 1350 Connecticut Ave., NW., Suite 900 Washington, D.C. 20036—6802 Washington, D.C. 20036 Counselfor Lockheed Martin Corporation Counselfor KaStarcom World Satellite LLC Joseph A. Godles Stephen R. Bell W. Kenneth Ferree Jennifer D. McCarthy Goldberg, Godles, Wiener & Wright Willkie Farr & Gallagher 1229 19th Street, N.W. Three Lafayette Centre Washington, D.C. 20036 1155 21st Street, N.W. Counselfor PanAmSat Corporation Washington, D.C. 20036—3384 Counselfor Loral Cyberstar, Inc.


Document Created: 2014-12-23 16:11:29
Document Modified: 2014-12-23 16:11:29
© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC