Attachment Attachments

This document pretains to ITC-STA-20151223-00304 for Special Temporal Authority on a International Telecommunications filing.

IBFS_ITCSTA2015122300304_1119537

                                                                    ,>>;~; HORSEY'"'

                                                                               KRISTIN K. BERKLAND
                                                                                           Associate
                                                                                       (612)492-6194
                                                                                   FAX (612) 395-5517
                                                                         berkland.kristin@dorsey.com



December 23, 2015

Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary
Federal Communications Commission
445 12th Street, S.W.
Washington, D.C. 20554

Attn:   Competition Policy Division
        Wireline Competition Bureau

        Adrienne McNeil
        International Bureau Policy Division

Re:     WC Docket No.

        and

        IBFS File No. ITC-214-20150918-00222

        Sangoma U.S., Inc. Request for Domestic Section 214 Transfers of Control
        Authority and International and Domestic Special Temporary Authority


Dear Ms. Dortch:

In this filing, Sangoma U.S., Inc. ("Sangoma U.S.") requests international Section 214 Special
Temporary Authority ("STA"), domestic Section 214 STA, and domestic Section 214 Authority.

On January 1, 2015, Sangoma U.S. acquired SIPStation, Inc. ("SIPStation") and Rockbochs Inc.
("Rockbochs"). Sangoma U.S. was unaware at the time of the transfers of control described in
this letter that Federal Communications Commission ("FCC" or "Commission") approval was
required for the transactions. Sangoma U.S. subsequently merged the two acquired companies
leaving a single company. It was only when that remaining company (Sangoma U.S.) received
DOJ Triage questions related to its international Section 214 application that the error was
realized. Accordingly, Sangoma U.S. now seeks such authority and international and domestic
STAs while its domestic Section 214 application, included as part of this STA, and its previously
filed international Section 214 application are pending. Specifically, Sangoma U.S. requests
international and domestic STAs to continue operations pending Commission action on
Sangoma U.S.'s previously filed international Section 214 authorization application and the
domestic Section 214 authorization application filed as Attachment 3 to this request for STA.




                   DORSEY &WHITNEY LLP WWW.DORSEY.COM • T 612.340.2600 F 612.340.2868
                   SUITE 1500 50 SOUTH SIXTH STREET •MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402-1498
                                                         USA   CANADA    EUROPE     ASIA -PACIFIC


                                                                                   ti~`~~ HORSEY'"



Sangoma U.S., Inc.
December 23, 2015
Page 2 of 4




Applicant

Sangoma U.S. is a Delaware based corporation whose parent entity is Sangoma Technologies
Corp. ("STC.V"), a Canadian publicly listed Company. Sangoma U.S.'s mailing address is 2414
Industrial Dr., Unit D, Neenah, WI 54956. Sangoma U.S. provides SIP dialtone service for
customer PBX connectivity, and store and forward FAX service to its international and domestic
customers.

Transfers of Control

Prior to the acquisitions of SIPStation and Rockbochs (the "Acquired Companies"), the Acquired
Companies were 100% U.S. owned and had not previously experienced a substantial transfer of
control. Thus, they had not been required to obtain domestic Section 214 licenses.' Pursuant
to the FCC's rules, however, prior to Sangoma U.S.'s acquisitions of SIPStation and
Rockbochs, applications should have been filed seeking FCC prior approval for the substantial
transfers of control.2 Nonetheless, because Sangoma U.S. was not aware that domestic
applications were required for each transfer of control, the required applications were not filed.

In reviewing the operations of the Acquired Companies as part of the DOJ Triage Question
preparation it was also noted that there was a de minimis amount of international long distance
traffic being carried. While both the Acquired Companies had a U.S. focus, they both resold
services from carriers that offer international long distance. A complete review of 2015
transactions for the period January 1 to September 30 found that the fees charged by the
Acquired Companies relating to international long distance were less than 1% of the Acquired
Companies' total billings. Nevertheless, the Acquired Parties had not obtained international
Section 214 authorizations,3 snd thus, there were no international Section 214 authorizations in
place at the time of the acquisitions for which Sangoma U.S. could have sought transfers of
control, even had Sangoma U.S. been aware of such an obligation.

Assignments

After acquiring the Acquired Parties, Sangoma U.S. subsequently merged SIPStation (July 1,
2015) and Rockbochs (October 1, 2015) into Sangoma U.S. and filed the international license
application for the merged companies. However, because there were no existing international
Section 214 authorizations at the time of the merger, there were no international Section 214

  See 47 C.F.R. § 63.01(a)("Any party that would be a domestic interstate communications common
carrier is authorized to provide domestic, interstate services to any domestic point and to construct or
operate any domestic transmission line as long as it obtains all necessary authorizations from the
Commission for use of radio frequencies.").
2 See 47 C.F.R. § 63.04 (describing the filing procedures for domestic and joint domestic/international
applications for transfers of control).
3 47 C.F.R. § 63.18 (requirement to apply for authority to provide international service).


                                                                                         DORSEY &WHITNEY LLP


                                                                             ~~'   ~~~f`~, D O R S E Y'"



Sangoma U.S., Inc.
December 23, 2015
Page 3 of 4


authorizations for Sangoma U.S. to assign. The Commission does not require notification for
the pro forma assignment of domestic Section 214 authorization.4 Throughout this period the
actual services offered to the customers of the Acquired Companies has not changed. Instead,
only the ownership of the companies has changed; they have been simplified into a single U.S.
operating entity. Sangoma U.S. continues to capture and remit all the required
telecommunications fees through its combined FCC Forms 499.

Public Interest Statement

Sangoma U.S. requests international and domestic STAs to permit continuation of its primary
interstate and very minor international telecommunication services to its longstanding
customers. This will avoid substantial harm and inconvenience to the business customers who
depend on Sangoma U.S.'s service on a daily basis. The transactions described in this letter
have not had, and will not have, any adverse impact on the quality and scope of the domestic
and international services provided. This is particularly true with respect to the pro forma
assignments, which are merely internal reorganizations meant to streamline Sangoma U.S.'s
operations.

Sangoma U.S. submits that a grant of its STA requests will not prejudice any action the
Commission may take on either Sangoma U.S.'s international or domestic Section 214
authorization applications. Sangoma acknowledges that a grant of STA may be revoked by the
Commission upon its own motion and without a hearing, and that a grant of these STA requests
and the corresponding Section 214 applications will not preclude enforcement action by the
Commission.

Granting Sangoma U.S.'s requests for STA serves the public interest by ensuring that there is
no interruption in the telecommunications services of Sangoma U.S.'s business customers, who
rely on the connectivity provided by the Acquired Companies' infrastructure and services for
their business operations. Some of these services are unique capabilities that allow remote
locations, in some cases offshore oil rigs, to communicate almost exclusively within the U.S.

Sangoma U.S. is simultaneously submitting this filing with the International Bureau and the
Wireline Competition Bureau, in accordance with the Commission's rules. This filing and the
applicable credit card payments are being submitted electronically through MyIBFS and ECFS.




4 See 47 C.F.R. §§ 63.03(d)(blanket authorization to transferor assign a domestic Section 214
authorization in case of a corporate restructuring that does not result in change in ultimate control),
63.24(f)(requirement to notify the Commission within 30 days of pro forma transfer or assignment of an
international Section 214 authorization).


                                                                                       DORSEY &WHITNEY LLP


                                                                          ~~~~,? HORSEY,"



Sangoma U.S., Inc.
December 23, 2015
Page 4 of 4


Please do not hesitate to contact us if you re   dditional information.


Respectfully submitted,



Kristin K. Berkland, Dorsey &Whitney LLP
Samir M. Islam, Dorsey &Whitney LLP
Erica R. Larson, Dorsey &Whitney LLP

Attorneys for Sangoma U.S., Inc.


cc:    Adrienne McNeil, FCC international Bureau Policy Division
       David Moore, CFO, Sangoma U.S., Inc.
       Philippe Lindheimer, Manager of Software Development, Sangoma U.S., Inc.
       Tony Lewis, General Manager, Sangoma U.S., Inc.
       Samantha Maqueo, Consultant, GSAssociates




                                                                             DORSEY &WHITNEY LLP


                                                                                               Attachment 1
                                                                                            Sangoma U.S., Inc..
                                                                                           December 23, 2015
                                                                                                  Page 1 of 4

                                                 Question 10

                                                 Introduction

Sangoma U.S., Inc.("Sangoma U.S."), by its attorneys and pursuant to Section 63.25 of the Commission's
Rules and Regulations,47 C.F.R. § 63.25, hereby respectfully requests Special Temporary Authority
("STA") to provide service to customers, pending consideration of and final Commission action on a
previously filed international Section 214 authorization application and a domestic Section 214
authorization application filed concurrently with this STA request. This STA and the concurrent domestic
Section 214 authorization application were filed to remedy recently discovered telecommunications
regulatory oversights; namely the failure to timely notify the Commission of Sangoma U.S.'s acquisition
of SIPStation Inc.("SIPStation") and Rockbochs Inc.("Rockbochs"), subsequent internal mergers of
SIPStation and Rockbochs into Sangoma U.S., and the failure of Rockbochs and SIPStation to seek prior
international Section 214 authorization. Accordingly, Sangoma U.S. seeks this STA to authorize its
continued operations while its Section 214 applications are considered by the Commission.

The STA is requested for a period of 180 days or until such time as the Commission has taken diapositive
action on the underlying applications for Section 214 authorization. Sangoma U.S. acknowledges that a
grant of this STA will not prejudice any action the Commission may take on the underlying Section 214
applications. Sangoma U.S. further acknowledges that this STA can be revoked by the Commission upon
its own motion and without a hearing.

                                                 Background

Sangoma U.S. is a Delaware based corporation whose parent entity is Sangoma Technologies Corp.
("STC.V"), a Canadian publicly listed Company. STC.V manufactures and sells hardware and software
components that enable or enhance IP Communication Systems for voice, data, and video applications.

On January 1, 2015, Sangoma U.S. acquired SIPStation and Rockbochs. SIPStation, based in Wisconsin,
was established to provide an integrated SIP trunking service. Rockbochs, based in Minnesota, offered
fax-over-IP service and supporting hardware. With the exception of Sangoma U.S.'s current
telecommunications service offerings (i.e., those telecommunications services formerly provided by
SIPStation and Rockbochs), which STC.V provides solely by virtue of its status as the ultimate parent
owner of Sangoma U.S., STC.V does not provide any telecommunications services in any country, nor is
STC.V affiliated with any other telecommunications providers. The international services provided by
each acquired company, and now by Sangoma U.S., are de minimis and Sangoma U.S. does not have
market power in any country.

Transfers of Control

Prior to the acquisitions of SIPStation and Rockbochs (the "Acquired Companies"), the Acquired
Companies were 100% U.S. owned and had not previously experienced a substantial transfer of control.
Thus, they had not been required to obtain domestic Section 214 licenses.l Pursuant to the FCC's rules,


1 See 47 C.F.R. § 63.01(a)("Any party that would be a domestic interstate communications common carrier is
authorized to provide domestic, interstate services to any domestic point and to construct or operate any


                                                                                                    Attachment 1
                                                                                                Sangoma U.S., Inc.
                                                                                               December 23, 2015
                                                                                                      Page 2 of 4

however, prior to Sangoma U.S.'s acquisitions of SIPStation and Rockbochs, applications should have
been filed seeking FCC prior approval for the substantial transfers of control.2 Nonetheless, because
Sangoma U.S. was not aware that domestic applications were required for each transfer of control, the
required applications were not filed.

In reviewing the operations of the Acquired Companies as part of the DOJ Triage Question preparation it
was also noted that there was a de minimis amount of international long distance traffic being carried.
While both the Acquired Companies had a U.S. focus, they both resold services from carriers that offer
international long distance. A complete review of 2015 transactions for the period January 1 to
September 30 found that the fees charged by the Acquired Companies relating to international long
distance were less than 1% of the Acquired Companies' total billings. Nevertheless, the Acquired Parties
had not obtained international Section 214 authorizations,3 and thus, there were no international
Section 214 authorizations in place at the time of the acquisitions for which Sangoma U.S. could have
sought transfers of control, even had Sangoma U.S. been aware of such an obligation.

Assignments

Sangoma U.S. also did not notify the Commission following what would have been proforma
assignments of international Section 214 authorization, had SIPStation and Rockbochs initially obtained
international Section 214 authority and approval for the substantial transfers of control.4 The
Commission does not require notification for the proforma assignment of domestic Section 214
authorizations

Sangoma U.S. regrets its part in the failure to seek prior Commission approval for the international and
domestic transfers of control of SIPStation and Rockbochs. Sangoma U.S. also regrets its failure to notify
the Commission of the international proforma assignments of authorization when it merged those
entities into Sangoma U.S. Failure to submit the required applications and notice in connection with
these transactions was an oversight that occurred due to lack of familiarity with the Commission's
Section 214 rules. Sangoma U.S. reports these transactions now, and seeks the requisite international
and domestic Section 214 authority, because it understands the importance of compliance with U.S.
telecommunications regulations and wants to assure the Commission of its intent to operate as a good
U.S. corporate citizen. Sangoma U.S. has worked diligently with counsel to gather the information
necessary to prepare the required international and domestic Section 214 applications and the
corresponding requests for STA. The company also intends to put in place internal monitoring controls
and to work with its current counsel to ensure full compliance with FCC licensing requirements in the
future.



domestic transmission line as long as it obtains all necessary authorizations from the Commission for use of radio
frequencies.").
Z See 47 C.F.R. § 63.04 (describing the filing procedures for domestic and joint domestic/international applications
for transfers of control).
3 See 47 C.F.R. § 63.18 (requirement to apply for authority to provide international service).
4 See 47 C.F.R. § 63.24(f).
5 See 47 C.F.R. §§ 63.03(d)(blanket authorization to transfer or assign a domestic Section 214 authorization in case
of a corporate restructuring that does not result in change in ultimate control), 63.24(f)(requirement to notify the
Commission within 30 days of proforma transfer or assignment of an international Section 214 authorization).


                                                                                                   Attachment 1
                                                                                               Sangoma U.S., Inc.
                                                                                              December 23, 2015
                                                                                                     Page 3 of 4

                                            Public Interest Statement

An STA to authorize continued operations would be in the public interest because it would avoid
disruption of service to Sangoma U.S.'s business'customers. In addition, granting Sangoma U.S.'s STA
request is consistent with Commission precedent.6 The Commission does not typically deny STAs where
they are the result of unintentional error, especially where such denial would mean disruption in
valuable services provided to the public. Rather, the FCC International Bureau has granted such
requests incases where previously undisclosed foreign ownership amounted to control of the licensee.'

Sangoma U.S.'s failure to seek and obtain the required international and domestic authorizations was
not done deliberately and no harm to customers has resulted from the transactions outlined in this
attachment. STC.V ,Sangoma U.S.'s ultimate parent owner, is a Canadian company and, until recently,
its senior officials had limited knowledge of U.S. telecommunications and licensing law.

As previously mentioned, Sangoma U.S. is taking steps to avoid such FCC regulatory compliance failures
in the future. It has engaged telecommunications counsel and has been briefed on the types of
transactions that require FCC notification and approval. Sangoma U.S. will consult telecommunications
counsel in the future regarding any sales and/or acquisitions of telecommunications assets and any
significant changes in company equity, ownership, or voting control.

                                            Questions 12 through 14

The answers to these questions are contained in Sangoma U.S.'s pending international Section 214
authorization application. See IBFS File No. ITC-214-20150918-00222. In accordance with the
instructions contained in item eleven of the STA application, we do not include the answers to these
questions again in this attachment.

                                                   Question 16

Sangoma U.S. provides the following responses to paragraphs (d),(e)(3), and (g) of Section 63.18:

63.18(d): Sangoma U.S. has not previously been granted authority under Section 214.


6 In two related actions, the FCC granted a domestic 214 STA to Diller Telephone Company ("Diller") and an
international 214 STA to its subsidiary Diode Telecom Inc.("Diode"). See Diller Telephone Co., Request for
Domestic Section 214 Special Temporary Authority, WC Docket No. 14-224 (filed Nov. 20, 2014)(stamped with
WCB grant of authority)("Diller Domestic Request"); Diller Telephone Co., International Section 214 Special
Temporary Authority Application, IBFS File No. ITC-STA-20141118-00301(FCC IB granted Nov. 26, 2014). These
applications were granted three years after Diller acquired Diode and failed to seek authorization for the transfer
or notify the Commission. See Diller Domestic Request at 1-2(underlying transactions took place in March, 2011).
~ See Public Notice, DA 12-543, at 3(FCC IB rel. Apr. 5, 2012)(granting application for assignment to One World
Telecom, LLC under IBFS File No. ITC-ASG-20110812-00261);see also Public Notice, DA 12-1842, at 3(FCC IB rel.
Nov. 15, 2012)(approving increased foreign investment transferring control of Verscom LLC under IBFS File No.
ITC-T/C-20120203-00040); Public Notice, Authorizations Granted, DA 07-3472, 22 FCC Rcd 13894(FCC IB rel. July
30, 2007)(granting applications of Satamatics, Inc., Satamatics Worldwide Limited, and Satamatics Global Limited
for consent to transfer control of licensees and authorizations, including a Section 214 authorization under IBFS
File No. ITC-T/C-20070319-00113).


                                                                                            Attachment 1
                                                                                        Sangoma U.S., Inc.
                                                                                       December 23, 2015
                                                                                              Page 4 of 4

63.18(e)(3): Sangoma U.S. will provide SIP dialtone service for customer PBX connectivity, and store and
forward FAX service. Sangoma U.S. thus requests Global Resale Authority to operate as a resale carrier
pursuant to Section 63.18(e)(2) of the Commission's rules. 47 C.F.R. § 63.18(e)(2). Sangoma U.S. will
comply with the terms and conditions contained in Sections 63.21 and 63.23 of the Commission's
regulations. 47 C.F.R. §§ 63.21, 63.23.

63.18(g): Not applicable. Sangoma U.S. does not seek facilities-based authorization.


                                                                                          Attachment 2
                                                                                       Sangoma U.S., Inc.
                                                                                      December 23, 2015
                                                                                             Page 1 of 1

The information requested for Attachment 2 has already been submitted to the Commission as part of
Sangoma U.S., Inc.'s pending international Section 214 authorization application. See IBFS File No. ITC-
214-20150918-00222. In accordance with the instructions contained in item eleven of the Special
Temporary Authority application, we do not resubmit this information.


                                                                                            Attachment 3
                                                                                         Sangoma U.S., Inc.
                                                                                        December 23, 2015
                                                                                               Page 1 of 4



Sangoma U.S., Inc.("Sangoma U.S.") hereby submits a request for domestic Section 214 authorization to
accompany its prior international Section 214 application. All required international information has
been provided in IBFS File No. ITC-214-20150918-00222 and the additional domestic information
required by FCC Rule 63.04(a) is set forth in the Application for Domestic Transfer or Control provided
immediately below.

                                            BEFORE THE
                               FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
                                       WASHINGTON,DC 20554

In the Matter of

Sangoma U.S., Inc.
                                                                  WC Docket No
Application for Authorization Pursuant to
Section 214 of the Communications Act of 1934,
As Amended,for Transfer of Control


                         APPLICATION FOR DOMESTIC TRANSFER OF CONTROL

        Sangoma U.S., Inc.("Sangoma U.S."), by its undersigned counsel, and pursuant to Section 214 of
the Communications Act of 1934, as amended,47 U.S.C. § 214, and Section 63.04 of the rules of the
Federal Communications Commission ("FCC" or the "Commission"),47 C.F.R. § 63.04, hereby requests
domestic Section 214 authority ("Application") as it relates to the prior transfers of control of SIPStation
Inc.("SIPStation")and Rockbochs Inc.("Rockbochs") to Sangoma U.S. Because the transfers of control
have previously taken effect, this Application is provided as an attachment to Sangoma U.S's
corresponding requests for Special Temporary Authority ("STA").

        Sangoma U.S. is a Delaware based corporation whose parent entity is Sangoma Technologies
Corp.("STC.V"), a Canadian publicly listed Company. On January 1, 2015, Sangoma U.S. acquired
SIPStation and Rockbochs. At the time of the acquisitions, two domestic Section 214 transfer of control
applications should have been submitted. 47 C.F.R. § 63.04. However, no such applications were
submitted because Sangoma U.S. was unaware that Commission approval was required for domestic
transfer of control transactions. Accordingly, Sangoma U.S. now seeks domestic Section 214 authority
from the Commission for the previous substantial transfers of control.




                                                                                         l~ORSkY h YVNI fNEY l Lf'


                                                                                          Attachment 3
                                                                                       Sangoma U.S., Inc.
                                                                                      December 23, 2015
                                                                                             Page 2 of 4


        Domestic Information Required to Supplement International Section 214 Application

       As previously noted in this Application, all of Sangoma U.S.'s required international information
has been provided in IBFS File No. ITC-214-20150918=00222. Sangoma U.S. provides the following
supplemental information in support of its request for domestic Section 214 authority: ~

        6.      Description of the transaction (§ 63.04(a)(6))

         On January 1, 2015, Sangoma U.S. acquired SIPStation and Rockbochs. Although domestic
Section 214 transfers of control were required for the two acquisitions, they were not obtained. See 47
C.F.R. § 63.04(a). Sangoma U.S. was unaware that Commission approval was required for the domestic
transfer of control transactions.

        7.      A description of the geographic areas in which the transferor and transferee (and their
                affiliates) offer domestic telecommunications services, and what services are provided
                in each area.(§ 63.04(a)(7))

Transferors

    Rockbochs: Rackbochs provided nationwide fax-over-IP monthly service, and telecommunications
    equipment and software to support that service.

    SIPStation: SIPStation was established to provide nationwide integrated SIP trunking service.

Transferee

    San~oma U.S.: Since the acquisition of SIPStation and Rockbochs and their subsequent merger into
    Sangoma U.S., Sangoma U.S. has provided nationwide, interstate telecommunications services
    including Fax-over-IP services and an integrated SIP trunking service. Specifically, Sangoma U.S.
    provides SIP dialtone service for customer PBX connectivity, and store and forward FAX service.

        8.      A statement as to how the application fits into one or more of the presumptive
                streamlined categories in this section or why it is otherwise appropriate for
                streamlined treatment. (§ 63.04(a)(8))

        Sangama U.S. does not seek streamlined treatment of this Application.

        9.      Identification of all other Commission applications related to the same transaction. (§
                63.04(a)(9))

         Sangoma U.S. is currently seeking international Section 214 authorization from the FCC. See
IBFS File No. ITC-214-2015Q918-00222.. Moreover, in connection with its requests for international and
domestic Section 214 authorization, Sangoma U.S. is seeking corresponding STA for both authorizations.


~ See 47 C.F.R. § 63.04(b)("In an attachment to the international application, the applicant should submit
the information described in paragraphs (a)(6) through (a)(12) of this section.")."

                                                    2
                                                                                        p01Z5E:Y A V✓HITNEY Ll~f'


                                                                                          Attachment 3
                                                                                       Sangoma U.S., Inc.
                                                                                      December 23, 2015
                                                                                             Page 3 of 4


        10.     A statement of whether the applicants are requesting special consideration because
                either party to the transaction is facing imminent business failure. (§ 63.04(a)(10))

       Although Sangoma U.S. does not currently face imminent business failure, it requires immediate
domestic Section 214 authority to prevent the disruption of service to its business customers.

        11.      Identification of any separately filed waiver requests being sought in conjunction
                 with the transaction. (§ 63.04(a)(11))

        Not applicable.

        12.     A statement showing how grant of the application will serve the public interest,
                convenience and necessity, including any additional information that may be
                necessary to show the effect of the proposed transaction on competition in domestic
                markets. (§ 63.04(a)(12))

        Grant of the instant Application will serve the public interest because it will rectify the
inadvertent oversight by Sangoma U.S. to obtain its domestic transfer of control authorizations.
Sangoma U.S.'s failure to seek and obtain the required FCC authorizations was not willful or intentional.
Rather, Sangoma U.S. was unfamiliar with the Commission's domestic Section 214 rules and now seeks
to remedy its prior oversight by requesting Commission approval. Sangoma U.S. has taken steps to
ensure compliance with FCC regulatory requirements in the future, including discussions with
telecommunications counsel regarding the FCC's rules for the transfer and assignment of domestic
Section 214 authorizations.

        Moreover, a grant of the instant Application will result in no harm to Sangoma U.S.'s customers.
To the contrary, absent the grant of the Application, Sangoma U.S.'s business customers, who rely on
the connectivity provided to them by Sangoma U.S.'s infrastructure and services for their business
operations, risk losing their services altogether. Granting Sangoma U.S.'s request for domestic Section
214 authority ensures continuity, allowing Sangoma U.S.'s customers to continue to provide reliable
business services.

        For the foregoing reasons, Sangoma U.S. respectfully requests that the Commission promptly
grant this Application.




                                                    3
                                                                                       DOR`~FY ~X 4VHITNEY I_l~N


                                                   Attachment 3
                                                Sangoma U.S., Inc.
                                               December 23, 2015
                                                      Page 4 of 4


Respectfully submitted,




Kristin K. Berkiand, Dorsey &Whitney LLP
Samir M. Islam, Dorsey &Whitney LLP
Erica R. Larson, Dorsey &Whitney LLP

Suite 1500, 50 South Sixth Street
Minneapolis, MN 55402-1498
612-492-6194

Attorneysfor Sangoma U.S., Inc.


Dated: December 23, 2015




                                           4
                                               t>o~skv ~ av~rrra~v t.i~r



Document Created: 2015-12-23 10:55:43
Document Modified: 2015-12-23 10:55:43

© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC