Sec. 1.65 Letter - I

Section 1.65 Notification submitted by Transtelco, Inc.

Section 1.65 Letter (1-27-2015)

2015-01-27

This document pretains to ITC-STA-20150112-00010 for Special Temporal Authority on a International Telecommunications filing.

IBFS_ITCSTA2015011200010_1074324

              LERMAN
              3ENTER
              PLLC


    WASHINGTON, DC                                                                      oP o(os
                                                                                        202.416.6782
                                                                                    dkeir@lermansenter.com


                                      January 27, 2015




BY ELECTRONIC POSTING

Ms. Marlene H. Dortch
Secretary
Federal Communications Commission
445 12" Street, S.W.
Washington, D.C. 20554

       Re:     Transtelco, Inc. — Request for Special Temporary Authority During
               Processing of Application for Transfer of Control of Section 214
               Authorization (FCC File No. ITC—STA—20150112—00010)

Dear Ms. Dortch:

        Transtelco, Inc. ("Transtelco"), by its attorneys and pursuant to Sections 1.65 and
63.21(a) of the Commission‘s Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.65 & 63.21(a), hereby supplements
the above—referenced request for Special Temporary Authority ("STA") in response to a
request for clarification from FCC staff. This letter seeks to clarify the STA Request in
three respects detailed below.

        First, the parties acknowledge that the grant of the requested STA would not
prejudice any action that the Commission may ultimately take on the underlying
application (FCC File No. ITC—T/C—20150112—00008). The parties further acknowledge
that any such STA, if granted, could subsequently be modified or revoked by the
Commission upon its own motion without prior hearing or notice.

       Second, Transtelco clarifies that in addition to the other circumstances supporting
grant of an STA, any outcome that would prevent Transtelco from operating under its
previously granted authority would have potentially severe negative consequences for
both the Transtelco and its customers. To the extent that continuation of the company‘s
current operations would be impaired by suspension ofits authority to operate
international carrier facilities, the consequent service interruptions would harm the
several dozen U.S. and Mexican companies that rely on the vital trans—border
communications links that the company provides. This, in turn, could have a significant

                  2000 K STREET, NW SurrE 600 | WasHINGTON, DC 20006—1809
                TeL 202.429.8970 | FAX 202.293.7783 | WWW.LERMANSENTER.COM


]_S      Ms. Marlene H. Dortch
         January 27, 2015
         Page 2




adverse impact on commerce in the border region, including the potential for job losses in
both the United States and Mexico.

       Finally, Transtelco respectfully requests that STA be granted for the maximum—
permitted 180—day duration. See 47 C.F.R. § 63.25(a)(1). In view of the likelihood that
it may take a matter of months for the Bureau to process the underlying application, an
STA of such duration would serve the public interest by minimizing the need for
additional extension requests that would be required if only a short—term 60—day STA
were granted.

        Please contact the undersigned counselif you have any questions or require any
additional information.

                                            /_Rn;pes%y submitted


                                                       6’,

                                             David S. Keit
                                             Counsel to Transtelco, Inc.



Document Created: 2015-01-27 16:58:11
Document Modified: 2015-01-27 16:58:11

© 2025 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC