Power Density TER

FCC ID: ZNFV450VM

RF Exposure Info

Download: PDF
FCCID_4310301

APPENDIX D: TOTAL EXPOSURE RATIO NEAR-FIELD POWER DENSITY Approved by: FCC ID: ZNFV450VM EVALUATION REPORT Quality Manager Test Dates: DUT Type: Appendix D 03/21/19 – 05/01/19 Portable Handset Page 1 of 17

The total exposure ratio (TER) is calculated by combining all SAR measurements and power density measurements after normalizing to their respective limits. The general expression is below. The TER shall be less than unity to ensure compliance with the limits. (*) For test positions that were not required to be evaluated for WLAN SAR per FCC KDB publication 248227, the worst case WLAN SAR result for the applicable exposure conditions was used for simultaneous transmission analysis. Worst-case power density results for each test configuration among all antenna arrays (QTM-0 and QTM-1) were considered for TER analysis. Table D-1 Head SAR and n261 Power Density TER Analysis 2.4 GHz 2.4 GHz LTE SAR WLAN Ant WLAN Ant Σ SAR S Exposure SAR/1.6 S/10 TER (W/kg) 1 SAR 2 SAR (W/kg) (W/m^2) Mode Condition (W/kg) (W/kg) 1 2 3 1+2+3 a 4 b a+b LTE Band 13 0.135 0.403 0.230 0.768 0.480 1.250 0.125 0.605 LTE Band 5 (Cell) 0.137 0.403 0.230 0.770 0.481 1.250 0.125 0.606 Head LTE Band 66 (AWS) 0.186 0.403 0.230 0.819 0.512 1.250 0.125 0.637 LTE Band 2 (PCS) 0.135 0.403 0.230 0.768 0.480 1.250 0.125 0.605 2.4 GHz 5 GHz LTE SAR WLAN Ant WLAN Ant Σ SAR S Exposure SAR/1.6 S/10 TER (W/kg) 1 SAR 2 SAR (W/kg) (W/m^2) Mode Condition (W/kg) (W/kg) 1 2 3 1+2+3 a 4 b a+b LTE Band 13 0.135 0.403 0.168 0.706 0.441 1.250 0.125 0.566 LTE Band 5 (Cell) 0.137 0.403 0.168 0.708 0.443 1.250 0.125 0.568 Head LTE Band 66 (AWS) 0.186 0.403 0.168 0.757 0.473 1.250 0.125 0.598 LTE Band 2 (PCS) 0.135 0.403 0.168 0.706 0.441 1.250 0.125 0.566 5 GHz 5 GHz LTE SAR WLAN Ant WLAN Ant Bluetooth Σ SAR S Exposure SAR/1.6 S/10 TER (W/kg) 1 SAR 2 SAR SAR (W/kg) (W/kg) (W/m^2) Mode Condition (W/kg) (W/kg) 1 2 3 4 1+2+3+4 a 5 b a+b LTE Band 13 0.135 0.450 0.168 0.108 0.861 0.538 1.250 0.125 0.663 LTE Band 5 (Cell) 0.137 0.450 0.168 0.108 0.863 0.539 1.250 0.125 0.664 Head LTE Band 66 (AWS) 0.186 0.450 0.168 0.108 0.912 0.570 1.250 0.125 0.695 LTE Band 2 (PCS) 0.135 0.450 0.168 0.108 0.861 0.538 1.250 0.125 0.663 Note: Power density front side 2mm test results were used for TER analysis of head exposure condition. Note: Some WLAN configurations were evaluated at a higher power level as a more conservative evaluation. Note: NR Band n261 was evaluated using MIMO (H+V) polarization. NEAR-FIELD POWER DENSITY Approved by: FCC ID: ZNFV450VM EVALUATION REPORT Quality Manager Test Dates: DUT Type: Appendix D 03/21/19 – 05/01/19 Portable Handset Page 2 of 17

Table D-2 Head SAR and n260 Power Density TER Analysis 2.4 GHz 2.4 GHz S S LTE SAR WLAN Ant WLAN Ant Σ SAR ΣS Exposure SAR/1.6 [H] [V] S/10 TER (W/kg) 1 SAR 2 SAR (W/kg) (W/m^2) Mode (W/m^2) (W/m^2) Condition (W/kg) (W/kg) 1 2 3 1+2+3 a 4 5 4+5 b a+b LTE Band 13 0.135 0.403 0.230 0.768 0.480 2.040 1.110 3.150 0.315 0.795 LTE Band 5 (Cell) 0.137 0.403 0.230 0.770 0.481 2.040 1.110 3.150 0.315 0.796 Head LTE Band 66 (AWS) 0.186 0.403 0.230 0.819 0.512 2.040 1.110 3.150 0.315 0.827 LTE Band 2 (PCS) 0.135 0.403 0.230 0.768 0.480 2.040 1.110 3.150 0.315 0.795 2.4 GHz 5 GHz S S LTE SAR WLAN Ant WLAN Ant Σ SAR ΣS Exposure SAR/1.6 [H] [V] S/10 TER (W/kg) 1 SAR 2 SAR (W/kg) (W/m^2) Mode (W/m^2) (W/m^2) Condition (W/kg) (W/kg) 1 2 3 1+2+3 a 4 5 4+5 b a+b LTE Band 13 0.135 0.403 0.168 0.706 0.441 2.040 1.110 3.150 0.315 0.756 LTE Band 5 (Cell) 0.137 0.403 0.168 0.708 0.443 2.040 1.110 3.150 0.315 0.758 Head LTE Band 66 (AWS) 0.186 0.403 0.168 0.757 0.473 2.040 1.110 3.150 0.315 0.788 LTE Band 2 (PCS) 0.135 0.403 0.168 0.706 0.441 2.040 1.110 3.150 0.315 0.756 5 GHz 5 GHz S S LTE SAR WLAN Ant WLAN Ant Bluetooth Σ SAR ΣS Exposure SAR/1.6 [H] [V] S/10 TER (W/kg) 1 SAR 2 SAR SAR (W/kg) (W/kg) (W/m^2) Mode (W/m^2) (W/m^2) Condition (W/kg) (W/kg) 1 2 3 4 1+2+3+4 a 5 6 5+6 b a+b LTE Band 13 0.135 0.450 0.168 0.108 0.861 0.538 2.040 1.110 3.150 0.315 0.853 LTE Band 5 (Cell) 0.137 0.450 0.168 0.108 0.863 0.539 2.040 1.110 3.150 0.315 0.854 Head LTE Band 66 (AWS) 0.186 0.450 0.168 0.108 0.912 0.570 2.040 1.110 3.150 0.315 0.885 LTE Band 2 (PCS) 0.135 0.450 0.168 0.108 0.861 0.538 2.040 1.110 3.150 0.315 0.853 Note: Power density front side 2 mm test results were used for TER analysis of head exposure condition. Note: Some WLAN configurations were evaluated at a higher power level as a more conservative evaluation. Note: Due to SW and HW limitations, NR Band n260 was evaluated using SISO H polarization and SISO V polarization. NEAR-FIELD POWER DENSITY Approved by: FCC ID: ZNFV450VM EVALUATION REPORT Quality Manager Test Dates: DUT Type: Appendix D 03/21/19 – 05/01/19 Portable Handset Page 3 of 17

Table D-3 Body-worn SAR and n261 Power Density TER Analysis 2.4 GHz 2.4 GHz LTE SAR WLAN Ant WLAN Ant Σ SAR S Exposure SAR/1.6 S/10 TER (W/kg) 1 SAR 2 SAR (W/kg) (W/m^2) Mode Condition (W/kg) (W/kg) 1 2 3 1+2+3 a 4 b a+b LTE Band 13 0.673 0.061 0.174 0.908 0.568 0.741 0.074 0.642 LTE Band 5 (Cell) 0.969 0.061 0.174 1.204 0.753 0.741 0.074 0.827 Body-worn LTE Band 66 (AWS) 0.584 0.061 0.174 0.819 0.512 0.741 0.074 0.586 LTE Band 2 (PCS) 0.554 0.061 0.174 0.789 0.493 0.741 0.074 0.567 2.4 GHz 5 GHz LTE SAR WLAN Ant WLAN Ant Σ SAR S Exposure SAR/1.6 S/10 TER (W/kg) 1 SAR 2 SAR (W/kg) (W/m^2) Mode Condition (W/kg) (W/kg) 1 2 3 1+2+3 a 4 b a+b LTE Band 13 0.673 0.061 0.163 0.897 0.561 0.741 0.074 0.635 LTE Band 5 (Cell) 0.969 0.061 0.163 1.193 0.746 0.741 0.074 0.820 Body-worn LTE Band 66 (AWS) 0.584 0.061 0.163 0.808 0.505 0.741 0.074 0.579 LTE Band 2 (PCS) 0.554 0.061 0.163 0.778 0.486 0.741 0.074 0.560 5 GHz 5 GHz LTE SAR WLAN Ant WLAN Ant Bluetooth Σ SAR S Exposure SAR/1.6 S/10 TER (W/kg) 1 SAR 2 SAR SAR (W/kg) (W/kg) (W/m^2) Mode Condition (W/kg) (W/kg) 1 2 3 4 1+2+3+4 a 5 b a+b LTE Band 13 0.673 0.113 0.163 0.020 0.969 0.606 0.741 0.074 0.680 LTE Band 5 (Cell) 0.969 0.113 0.163 0.020 1.265 0.791 0.741 0.074 0.865 Body-worn LTE Band 66 (AWS) 0.584 0.113 0.163 0.020 0.880 0.550 0.741 0.074 0.624 LTE Band 2 (PCS) 0.554 0.113 0.163 0.020 0.850 0.531 0.741 0.074 0.605 Note: worst case back side power density at 2mm was used for body-worn TER analysis. Note: Some WLAN configurations were evaluated at a higher power level as a more conservative evaluation. Note: NR Band n261 was evaluated using MIMO (H+V) polarization. NEAR-FIELD POWER DENSITY Approved by: FCC ID: ZNFV450VM EVALUATION REPORT Quality Manager Test Dates: DUT Type: Appendix D 03/21/19 – 05/01/19 Portable Handset Page 4 of 17

Table D-4 Body-worn SAR and n260 Power Density TER Analysis 2.4 GHz 2.4 GHz S S LTE SAR WLAN Ant WLAN Ant Σ SAR ΣS Exposure SAR/1.6 [H] [V] S/10 TER (W/kg) 1 SAR 2 SAR (W/kg) (W/m^2) Mode (W/m^2) (W/m^2) Condition (W/kg) (W/kg) 1 2 3 1+2+3 a 4 5 4+5 b a+b LTE Band 13 0.673 0.061 0.174 0.908 0.568 0.758 0.682 1.440 0.144 0.712 LTE Band 5 (Cell) 0.969 0.061 0.174 1.204 0.753 0.758 0.682 1.440 0.144 0.897 Body-worn LTE Band 66 (AWS) 0.584 0.061 0.174 0.819 0.512 0.758 0.682 1.440 0.144 0.656 LTE Band 2 (PCS) 0.554 0.061 0.174 0.789 0.493 0.758 0.682 1.440 0.144 0.637 2.4 GHz 5 GHz S S LTE SAR WLAN Ant WLAN Ant Σ SAR ΣS Exposure SAR/1.6 [H] [V] S/10 TER (W/kg) 1 SAR 2 SAR (W/kg) (W/m^2) Mode (W/m^2) (W/m^2) Condition (W/kg) (W/kg) 1 2 3 1+2+3 a 4 5 4+5 b a+b LTE Band 13 0.673 0.061 0.163 0.897 0.561 0.758 0.682 1.440 0.144 0.705 LTE Band 5 (Cell) 0.969 0.061 0.163 1.193 0.746 0.758 0.682 1.440 0.144 0.890 Body-worn LTE Band 66 (AWS) 0.584 0.061 0.163 0.808 0.505 0.758 0.682 1.440 0.144 0.649 LTE Band 2 (PCS) 0.554 0.061 0.163 0.778 0.486 0.758 0.682 1.440 0.144 0.630 5 GHz 5 GHz S S LTE SAR WLAN Ant WLAN Ant Bluetooth Σ SAR ΣS Exposure SAR/1.6 [H] [V] S/10 TER (W/kg) 1 SAR 2 SAR SAR (W/kg) (W/kg) (W/m^2) Mode (W/m^2) (W/m^2) Condition (W/kg) (W/kg) 1 2 3 4 1+2+3+4 a 5 6 5+6 b a+b LTE Band 13 0.673 0.113 0.163 0.020 0.969 0.606 0.758 0.682 1.440 0.144 0.750 LTE Band 5 (Cell) 0.969 0.113 0.163 0.020 1.265 0.791 0.758 0.682 1.440 0.144 0.935 Body-worn LTE Band 66 (AWS) 0.584 0.113 0.163 0.020 0.880 0.550 0.758 0.682 1.440 0.144 0.694 LTE Band 2 (PCS) 0.554 0.113 0.163 0.020 0.850 0.531 0.758 0.682 1.440 0.144 0.675 Note: worst case back side power density at 2mm was used for body-worn TER analysis. Note: Some WLAN configurations were evaluated at a higher power level as a more conservative evaluation. Note: Due to SW and HW limitations, NR Band n260 was evaluated using SISO H polarization and SISO V polarization. NEAR-FIELD POWER DENSITY Approved by: FCC ID: ZNFV450VM EVALUATION REPORT Quality Manager Test Dates: DUT Type: Appendix D 03/21/19 – 05/01/19 Portable Handset Page 5 of 17

Table D-5 Hotspot SAR and n261 Power Density TER Analysis 2.4 GHz 2.4 GHz LTE Band WLAN Ant WLAN Ant Σ SAR S 13 SAR SAR/1.6 S/10 TER 1 SAR 2 SAR (W/kg) (W/m^2) Simult Tx Configuration (W/kg) (W/kg) (W/kg) 1 2 3 1+2+3 a 4 b a+b Back 0.673 0.100* 0.174 0.947 0.592 0.741 0.074 0.666 Front 0.516 0.100* 0.174* 0.790 0.494 1.250 0.125 0.619 Hotspot Top 0.000 0.100 0.174* 0.274 0.171 0.469 0.047 0.218 SAR Bottom 0.209 0.000 0.000 0.209 0.131 0.000 0.000 0.131 Right 0.331 0.100* 0.174* 0.605 0.378 3.500 0.350 0.728 Left 0.185 0.000 0.000 0.185 0.116 4.340 0.434 0.550 2.4 GHz 2.4 GHz LTE Band 5 WLAN Ant WLAN Ant Σ SAR S (Cell) SAR SAR/1.6 S/10 TER 1 SAR 2 SAR (W/kg) (W/m^2) Simult Tx Configuration (W/kg) (W/kg) (W/kg) 1 2 3 1+2+3 a 4 b a+b Back 0.969 0.100* 0.174 1.243 0.777 0.741 0.074 0.851 Front 0.711 0.100* 0.174* 0.985 0.616 1.250 0.125 0.741 Hotspot Top 0.000 0.100 0.174* 0.274 0.171 0.469 0.047 0.218 SAR Bottom 0.235 0.000 0.000 0.235 0.147 0.000 0.000 0.147 Right 0.381 0.100* 0.174* 0.655 0.409 3.500 0.350 0.759 Left 0.120 0.000 0.000 0.120 0.075 4.340 0.434 0.509 2.4 GHz 2.4 GHz LTE Band WLAN Ant WLAN Ant Σ SAR S 66 (AWS) SAR/1.6 S/10 TER 1 SAR 2 SAR (W/kg) (W/m^2) Simult Tx Configuration SAR (W/kg) (W/kg) (W/kg) 1 2 3 1+2+3 a 4 b a+b Back 0.584 0.100* 0.174 0.858 0.536 0.741 0.074 0.610 Front 0.603 0.100* 0.174* 0.877 0.548 1.250 0.125 0.673 Hotspot Top 0.000 0.100 0.174* 0.274 0.171 0.469 0.047 0.218 SAR Bottom 1.227 0.000 0.000 1.227 0.767 0.000 0.000 0.767 Right 0.179 0.100* 0.174* 0.453 0.283 3.500 0.350 0.633 Left 0.282 0.000 0.000 0.282 0.176 4.340 0.434 0.610 2.4 GHz 2.4 GHz LTE Band 2 WLAN Ant WLAN Ant Σ SAR S (PCS) SAR SAR/1.6 S/10 TER 1 SAR 2 SAR (W/kg) (W/m^2) Simult Tx Configuration (W/kg) (W/kg) (W/kg) 1 2 3 1+2+3 a 4 b a+b Back 0.554 0.100* 0.174 0.828 0.518 0.741 0.074 0.592 Front 0.600 0.100* 0.174* 0.874 0.546 1.250 0.125 0.671 Hotspot Top 0.000 0.100 0.174* 0.274 0.171 0.469 0.047 0.218 SAR Bottom 1.149 0.000 0.000 1.149 0.718 0.000 0.000 0.718 Right 0.137 0.100* 0.174* 0.411 0.257 3.500 0.350 0.607 Left 0.169 0.000 0.000 0.169 0.106 4.340 0.434 0.540 Note: Worst case back and front side, left, right, and top edge power density at 2mm was used for hotspot TER analysis. Note: Some WLAN configurations were evaluated at a higher power level as a more conservative evaluation. Note: Per FCC guidance, the device edges that are not required to be evaluated are indicated 0 for TER analysis. Note: NR Band n261 was evaluated using MIMO (H+V) polarization. NEAR-FIELD POWER DENSITY Approved by: FCC ID: ZNFV450VM EVALUATION REPORT Quality Manager Test Dates: DUT Type: Appendix D 03/21/19 – 05/01/19 Portable Handset Page 6 of 17

2.4 GHz 5 GHz LTE Band WLAN Ant WLAN Ant Σ SAR S 13 SAR SAR/1.6 S/10 TER 1 SAR 2 SAR (W/kg) (W/m^2) Simult Tx Configuration (W/kg) (W/kg) (W/kg) 1 2 3 1+2+3 a 4 b a+b Back 0.673 0.100* 0.144 0.917 0.573 0.741 0.074 0.647 Front 0.516 0.100* 0.144* 0.760 0.475 1.250 0.125 0.600 Hotspot Top 0.000 0.100 0.144* 0.244 0.153 0.469 0.047 0.199 SAR Bottom 0.209 0.000 0.000 0.209 0.131 0.000 0.000 0.131 Right 0.331 0.100* 0.144* 0.575 0.359 3.500 0.350 0.709 Left 0.185 0.000 0.000 0.185 0.116 4.340 0.434 0.550 2.4 GHz 5 GHz LTE Band 5 WLAN Ant WLAN Ant Σ SAR S (Cell) SAR SAR/1.6 S/10 TER 1 SAR 2 SAR (W/kg) (W/m^2) Simult Tx Configuration (W/kg) (W/kg) (W/kg) 1 2 3 1+2+3 a 4 b a+b Back 0.969 0.100* 0.144 1.213 0.758 0.741 0.074 0.832 Front 0.711 0.100* 0.144* 0.955 0.597 1.250 0.125 0.722 Hotspot Top 0.000 0.100 0.144* 0.244 0.153 0.469 0.047 0.199 SAR Bottom 0.235 0.000 0.000 0.235 0.147 0.000 0.000 0.147 Right 0.381 0.100* 0.144* 0.625 0.391 3.500 0.350 0.741 Left 0.120 0.000 0.000 0.120 0.075 4.340 0.434 0.509 2.4 GHz 5 GHz LTE Band WLAN Ant WLAN Ant Σ SAR S 66 (AWS) SAR/1.6 S/10 TER 1 SAR 2 SAR (W/kg) (W/m^2) Simult Tx Configuration SAR (W/kg) (W/kg) (W/kg) 1 2 3 1+2+3 a 4 b a+b Back 0.584 0.100* 0.144 0.828 0.518 0.741 0.074 0.592 Front 0.603 0.100* 0.144* 0.847 0.529 1.250 0.125 0.654 Hotspot Top 0.000 0.100 0.144* 0.244 0.153 0.469 0.047 0.199 SAR Bottom 1.227 0.000 0.000 1.227 0.767 0.000 0.000 0.767 Right 0.179 0.100* 0.144* 0.423 0.264 3.500 0.350 0.614 Left 0.282 0.000 0.000 0.282 0.176 4.340 0.434 0.610 2.4 GHz 5 GHz LTE Band 2 WLAN Ant WLAN Ant Σ SAR S (PCS) SAR SAR/1.6 S/10 TER 1 SAR 2 SAR (W/kg) (W/m^2) Simult Tx Configuration (W/kg) (W/kg) (W/kg) 1 2 3 1+2+3 a 4 b a+b Back 0.554 0.100* 0.144 0.798 0.499 0.741 0.074 0.573 Front 0.600 0.100* 0.144* 0.844 0.528 1.250 0.125 0.653 Hotspot Top 0.000 0.100 0.144* 0.244 0.153 0.469 0.047 0.199 SAR Bottom 1.149 0.000 0.000 1.149 0.718 0.000 0.000 0.718 Right 0.137 0.100* 0.144* 0.381 0.238 3.500 0.350 0.588 Left 0.169 0.000 0.000 0.169 0.106 4.340 0.434 0.540 Note: Worst case back and front side, left, right, and top edge power density at 2mm was used for hotspot TER analysis. Note: Some WLAN configurations were evaluated at a higher power level as a more conservative evaluation. Note: Per FCC guidance, the device edges that are not required to be evaluated are indicated 0 for TER analysis. Note: NR Band n261 was evaluated using MIMO (H+V) polarization. NEAR-FIELD POWER DENSITY Approved by: FCC ID: ZNFV450VM EVALUATION REPORT Quality Manager Test Dates: DUT Type: Appendix D 03/21/19 – 05/01/19 Portable Handset Page 7 of 17

5 GHz 5 GHz LTE Band WLAN Ant WLAN Ant Bluetooth Σ SAR S 13 SAR SAR/1.6 S/10 TER 1 SAR 2 SAR SAR (W/kg) (W/kg) (W/m^2) Simult Tx Configuration (W/kg) (W/kg) (W/kg) 1 2 3 4 1+2+3+4 a 5 b a+b Back 0.673 0.108 0.144 0.020 0.945 0.591 0.741 0.074 0.665 Front 0.516 0.108* 0.144* 0.016 0.784 0.490 1.250 0.125 0.615 Hotspot Top 0.000 0.108* 0.144* 0.049 0.301 0.188 0.469 0.047 0.235 SAR Bottom 0.209 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.209 0.131 0.000 0.000 0.131 Right 0.331 0.108* 0.144* 0.006 0.589 0.368 3.500 0.350 0.718 Left 0.185 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.185 0.116 4.340 0.434 0.550 5 GHz 5 GHz LTE Band 5 WLAN Ant WLAN Ant Bluetooth Σ SAR S (Cell) SAR SAR/1.6 S/10 TER 1 SAR 2 SAR SAR (W/kg) (W/kg) (W/m^2) Simult Tx Configuration (W/kg) (W/kg) (W/kg) 1 2 3 4 1+2+3+4 a 5 b a+b Back 0.969 0.108 0.144 0.020 1.241 0.776 0.741 0.074 0.850 Front 0.711 0.108* 0.144* 0.016 0.979 0.612 1.250 0.125 0.737 Hotspot Top 0.000 0.108* 0.144* 0.049 0.301 0.188 0.469 0.047 0.235 SAR Bottom 0.235 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.235 0.147 0.000 0.000 0.147 Right 0.381 0.108* 0.144* 0.006 0.639 0.399 3.500 0.350 0.749 Left 0.120 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.120 0.075 4.340 0.434 0.509 5 GHz 5 GHz LTE Band WLAN Ant WLAN Ant Bluetooth Σ SAR S 66 (AWS) SAR/1.6 S/10 TER 1 SAR 2 SAR SAR (W/kg) (W/kg) (W/m^2) Simult Tx Configuration SAR (W/kg) (W/kg) (W/kg) 1 2 3 4 1+2+3+4 a 5 b a+b Back 0.584 0.108 0.144 0.020 0.856 0.535 0.741 0.074 0.609 Front 0.603 0.108* 0.144* 0.016 0.871 0.544 1.250 0.125 0.669 Hotspot Top 0.000 0.108* 0.144* 0.049 0.301 0.188 0.469 0.047 0.235 SAR Bottom 1.227 0.000 0.000 0.000 1.227 0.767 0.000 0.000 0.767 Right 0.179 0.108* 0.144* 0.006 0.437 0.273 3.500 0.350 0.623 Left 0.282 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.282 0.176 4.340 0.434 0.610 5 GHz 5 GHz LTE Band 2 WLAN Ant WLAN Ant Bluetooth Σ SAR S (PCS) SAR SAR/1.6 S/10 TER 1 SAR 2 SAR SAR (W/kg) (W/kg) (W/m^2) Simult Tx Configuration (W/kg) (W/kg) (W/kg) 1 2 3 4 1+2+3+4 a 5 b a+b Back 0.554 0.108 0.144 0.020 0.826 0.516 0.741 0.074 0.590 Front 0.600 0.108* 0.144* 0.016 0.868 0.543 1.250 0.125 0.668 Hotspot Top 0.000 0.108* 0.144* 0.049 0.301 0.188 0.469 0.047 0.235 SAR Bottom 1.149 0.000 0.000 0.000 1.149 0.718 0.000 0.000 0.718 Right 0.137 0.108* 0.144* 0.006 0.395 0.247 3.500 0.350 0.597 Left 0.169 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.169 0.106 4.340 0.434 0.540 Note: Worst case back and front side, left, right, and top edge power density at 2mm was used for hotspot TER analysis. Note: Some WLAN configurations were evaluated at a higher power level as a more conservative evaluation. Note: Per FCC guidance, the device edges that are not required to be evaluated are indicated 0 for TER analysis. Note: NR Band n261 was evaluated using MIMO (H+V) polarization. NEAR-FIELD POWER DENSITY Approved by: FCC ID: ZNFV450VM EVALUATION REPORT Quality Manager Test Dates: DUT Type: Appendix D 03/21/19 – 05/01/19 Portable Handset Page 8 of 17

Table D-6 Hotspot SAR and n260 Power Density TER Analysis 2.4 GHz 2.4 GHz LTE Band S S WLAN Ant WLAN Ant Σ SAR ΣS 13 SAR SAR/1.6 [H] [V] S/10 TER 1 SAR 2 SAR (W/kg) (W/m^2) Simult Tx Configuration (W/kg) (W/m^2) (W/m^2) (W/kg) (W/kg) 1 2 3 1+2+3 a 4 5 4+5 b a+b Back 0.673 0.100* 0.174 0.947 0.592 0.758 0.682 1.440 0.144 0.736 Front 0.516 0.100* 0.174* 0.790 0.494 2.040 1.110 3.150 0.315 0.809 Hotspot Top 0.000 0.100 0.174* 0.274 0.171 0.386 0.353 0.739 0.074 0.245 SAR Bottom 0.209 0.000 0.000 0.209 0.131 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.131 Right 0.331 0.100* 0.174* 0.605 0.378 2.230 2.240 4.470 0.447 0.825 Left 0.185 0 0.000 0.000 0.185 0.116 2.600 2.140 4.740 0.474 0.590 2.4 GHz 2.4 GHz LTE Band 5 S S WLAN Ant WLAN Ant Σ SAR ΣS (Cell) SAR SAR/1.6 [H] [V] S/10 TER 1 SAR 2 SAR (W/kg) (W/m^2) Simult Tx Configuration (W/kg) (W/m^2) (W/m^2) (W/kg) (W/kg) 1 2 3 1+2+3 a 4 5 4+5 b a+b Back 0.969 0.100* 0.174 1.243 0.777 0.758 0.682 1.440 0.144 0.921 Front 0.711 0.100* 0.174* 0.985 0.616 2.040 1.110 3.150 0.315 0.931 Hotspot Top 0.000 0.100 0.174* 0.274 0.171 0.386 0.353 0.739 0.074 0.245 SAR Bottom 0.235 0.000 0.000 0.235 0.147 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.147 Right 0.381 0.100* 0.174* 0.655 0.409 2.230 2.240 4.470 0.447 0.856 Left 0.120 0.000 0.000 0.120 0.075 2.600 2.140 4.740 0.474 0.549 2.4 GHz 2.4 GHz LTE Band S S WLAN Ant WLAN Ant Σ SAR ΣS 66 (AWS) SAR/1.6 [H] [V] S/10 TER 1 SAR 2 SAR (W/kg) (W/m^2) Simult Tx Configuration SAR (W/kg) (W/m^2) (W/m^2) (W/kg) (W/kg) 1 2 3 1+2+3 a 4 5 4+5 b a+b Back 0.584 0.100* 0.174 0.858 0.536 0.758 0.682 1.440 0.144 0.680 Front 0.603 0.100* 0.174* 0.877 0.548 2.040 1.110 3.150 0.315 0.863 Hotspot Top 0.000 0.100 0.174* 0.274 0.171 0.386 0.353 0.739 0.074 0.245 SAR Bottom 1.227 0.000 0.000 1.227 0.767 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.767 Right 0.179 0.100* 0.174* 0.453 0.283 2.230 2.240 4.470 0.447 0.730 Left 0.282 0.000 0.000 0.282 0.176 2.600 2.140 4.740 0.474 0.650 2.4 GHz 2.4 GHz LTE Band 2 S S WLAN Ant WLAN Ant Σ SAR ΣS (PCS) SAR SAR/1.6 [H] [V] S/10 TER 1 SAR 2 SAR (W/kg) (W/m^2) Simult Tx Configuration (W/kg) (W/m^2) (W/m^2) (W/kg) (W/kg) 1 2 3 1+2+3 a 4 5 4+5 b a+b Back 0.554 0.100* 0.174 0.828 0.518 0.758 0.682 1.440 0.144 0.662 Front 0.600 0.100* 0.174* 0.874 0.546 2.040 1.110 3.150 0.315 0.861 Hotspot Top 0.000 0.100 0.174* 0.274 0.171 0.386 0.353 0.739 0.074 0.245 SAR Bottom 1.149 0.000 0.000 1.149 0.718 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.718 Right 0.137 0.100* 0.174* 0.411 0.257 2.230 2.240 4.470 0.447 0.704 Left 0.169 0.000 0.000 0.169 0.106 2.600 2.140 4.740 0.474 0.580 Note: Worst case back and front side, left, right, and top edge power density at 2mm was used for hotspot TER analysis. Note: Some WLAN configurations were evaluated at a higher power level as a more conservative evaluation. Note: Per FCC guidance, the device edges that are not required to be evaluated are indicated 0 for TER analysis. Note: Due to SW and HW limitations, NR Band n260 was evaluated using SISO H polarization and SISO V polarization. NEAR-FIELD POWER DENSITY Approved by: FCC ID: ZNFV450VM EVALUATION REPORT Quality Manager Test Dates: DUT Type: Appendix D 03/21/19 – 05/01/19 Portable Handset Page 9 of 17

2.4 GHz 5 GHz LTE Band S S WLAN Ant WLAN Ant Σ SAR ΣS 13 SAR SAR/1.6 [H] [V] S/10 TER 1 SAR 2 SAR (W/kg) (W/m^2) Simult Tx Configuration (W/kg) (W/m^2) (W/m^2) (W/kg) (W/kg) 1 2 3 1+2+3 a 4 5 4+5 b a+b Back 0.673 0.100* 0.144 0.917 0.573 0.758 0.682 1.440 0.144 0.717 Front 0.516 0.100* 0.144* 0.760 0.475 2.040 1.110 3.150 0.315 0.790 Hotspot Top 0.000 0.100 0.144* 0.244 0.153 0.386 0.353 0.739 0.074 0.226 SAR Bottom 0.209 0.000 0.000 0.209 0.131 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.131 Right 0.331 0.100* 0.144* 0.575 0.359 2.230 2.240 4.470 0.447 0.806 Left 0.185 0 0.000 0.000 0.185 0.116 2.600 2.140 4.740 0.474 0.590 2.4 GHz 5 GHz LTE Band 5 S S WLAN Ant WLAN Ant Σ SAR ΣS (Cell) SAR SAR/1.6 [H] [V] S/10 TER 1 SAR 2 SAR (W/kg) (W/m^2) Simult Tx Configuration (W/kg) (W/m^2) (W/m^2) (W/kg) (W/kg) 1 2 3 1+2+3 a 4 5 4+5 b a+b Back 0.969 0.100* 0.144 1.213 0.758 0.758 0.682 1.440 0.144 0.902 Front 0.711 0.100* 0.144* 0.955 0.597 2.040 1.110 3.150 0.315 0.912 Hotspot Top 0.000 0.100 0.144* 0.244 0.153 0.386 0.353 0.739 0.074 0.226 SAR Bottom 0.235 0.000 0.000 0.235 0.147 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.147 Right 0.381 0.100* 0.144* 0.625 0.391 2.230 2.240 4.470 0.447 0.838 Left 0.120 0.000 0.000 0.120 0.075 2.600 2.140 4.740 0.474 0.549 2.4 GHz 5 GHz LTE Band S S WLAN Ant WLAN Ant Σ SAR ΣS 66 (AWS) SAR/1.6 [H] [V] S/10 TER 1 SAR 2 SAR (W/kg) (W/m^2) Simult Tx Configuration SAR (W/kg) (W/m^2) (W/m^2) (W/kg) (W/kg) 1 2 3 1+2+3 a 4 5 4+5 b a+b Back 0.584 0.100* 0.144 0.828 0.518 0.758 0.682 1.440 0.144 0.662 Front 0.603 0.100* 0.144* 0.847 0.529 2.040 1.110 3.150 0.315 0.844 Hotspot Top 0.000 0.100 0.144* 0.244 0.153 0.386 0.353 0.739 0.074 0.226 SAR Bottom 1.227 0.000 0.000 1.227 0.767 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.767 Right 0.179 0.100* 0.144* 0.423 0.264 2.230 2.240 4.470 0.447 0.711 Left 0.282 0.000 0.000 0.282 0.176 2.600 2.140 4.740 0.474 0.650 2.4 GHz 5 GHz LTE Band 2 S S WLAN Ant WLAN Ant Σ SAR ΣS (PCS) SAR SAR/1.6 [H] [V] S/10 TER 1 SAR 2 SAR (W/kg) (W/m^2) Simult Tx Configuration (W/kg) (W/m^2) (W/m^2) (W/kg) (W/kg) 1 2 3 1+2+3 a 4 5 4+5 b a+b Back 0.554 0.100* 0.144 0.798 0.499 0.758 0.682 1.440 0.144 0.643 Front 0.600 0.100* 0.144* 0.844 0.528 2.040 1.110 3.150 0.315 0.843 Hotspot Top 0.000 0.100 0.144* 0.244 0.153 0.386 0.353 0.739 0.074 0.226 SAR Bottom 1.149 0.000 0.000 1.149 0.718 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.718 Right 0.137 0.100* 0.144* 0.381 0.238 2.230 2.240 4.470 0.447 0.685 Left 0.169 0.000 0.000 0.169 0.106 2.600 2.140 4.740 0.474 0.580 Note: Worst case back and front side, left, right, and top edge power density at 2mm was used for hotspot TER analysis. Note: Some WLAN configurations were evaluated at a higher power level as a more conservative evaluation. Note: Per FCC guidance, the device edges that are not required to be evaluated are indicated 0 for TER analysis. Note: Due to SW and HW limitations, NR Band n260 was evaluated using SISO H polarization and SISO V polarization. NEAR-FIELD POWER DENSITY Approved by: FCC ID: ZNFV450VM EVALUATION REPORT Quality Manager Test Dates: DUT Type: Appendix D 03/21/19 – 05/01/19 Portable Handset Page 10 of 17

5 GHz 5 GHz LTE Band S S WLAN Ant WLAN Ant Bluetooth Σ SAR ΣS 13 SAR SAR/1.6 [H] [V] S/10 TER 1 SAR 2 SAR SAR (W/kg) (W/kg) (W/m^2) Simult Tx Configuration (W/kg) (W/m^2) (W/m^2) (W/kg) (W/kg) 1 2 3 4 1+2+3+4 a 5 6 5+6 b a+b Back 0.673 0.108 0.144 0.020 0.945 0.591 0.758 0.682 1.440 0.144 0.735 Front 0.516 0.108* 0.144* 0.016 0.784 0.490 2.040 1.110 3.150 0.315 0.805 Hotspot Top 0.000 0.108* 0.144* 0.049 0.301 0.188 0.386 0.353 0.739 0.074 0.262 SAR Bottom 0.209 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.209 0.131 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.131 Right 0.331 0.108* 0.144* 0.006 0.589 0.368 2.230 2.240 4.470 0.447 0.815 Left 0.185 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.185 0.116 2.600 2.140 4.740 0.474 0.590 5 GHz 5 GHz LTE Band 5 S S WLAN Ant WLAN Ant Bluetooth Σ SAR ΣS (Cell) SAR SAR/1.6 [H] [V] S/10 TER 1 SAR 2 SAR SAR (W/kg) (W/kg) (W/m^2) Simult Tx Configuration (W/kg) (W/m^2) (W/m^2) (W/kg) (W/kg) 1 2 3 4 1+2+3+4 a 5 6 5+6 b a+b Back 0.969 0.108 0.144 0.020 1.241 0.776 0.758 0.682 1.440 0.144 0.920 Front 0.711 0.108* 0.144* 0.016 0.979 0.612 2.040 1.110 3.150 0.315 0.927 Hotspot Top 0.000 0.108* 0.144* 0.049 0.301 0.188 0.386 0.353 0.739 0.074 0.262 SAR Bottom 0.235 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.235 0.147 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.147 Right 0.381 0.108* 0.144* 0.006 0.639 0.399 2.230 2.240 4.470 0.447 0.846 Left 0.120 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.120 0.075 2.600 2.140 4.740 0.474 0.549 5 GHz 5 GHz LTE Band S S WLAN Ant WLAN Ant Bluetooth Σ SAR ΣS 66 (AWS) SAR/1.6 [H] [V] S/10 TER 1 SAR 2 SAR SAR (W/kg) (W/kg) (W/m^2) Simult Tx Configuration SAR (W/kg) (W/m^2) (W/m^2) (W/kg) (W/kg) 1 2 3 4 1+2+3+4 a 5 6 5+6 b a+b Back 0.584 0.108 0.144 0.020 0.856 0.535 0.758 0.682 1.440 0.144 0.679 Front 0.603 0.108* 0.144* 0.016 0.871 0.544 2.040 1.110 3.150 0.315 0.859 Hotspot Top 0.000 0.108* 0.144* 0.049 0.301 0.188 0.386 0.353 0.739 0.074 0.262 SAR Bottom 1.227 0.000 0.000 0.000 1.227 0.767 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.767 Right 0.179 0.108* 0.144* 0.006 0.437 0.273 2.230 2.240 4.470 0.447 0.720 Left 0.282 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.282 0.176 2.600 2.140 4.740 0.474 0.650 5 GHz 5 GHz LTE Band 2 S S WLAN Ant WLAN Ant Bluetooth Σ SAR ΣS (PCS) SAR SAR/1.6 [H] [V] S/10 TER 1 SAR 2 SAR SAR (W/kg) (W/kg) (W/m^2) Simult Tx Configuration (W/kg) (W/m^2) (W/m^2) (W/kg) (W/kg) 1 2 3 4 1+2+3+4 a 5 6 5+6 b a+b Back 0.554 0.108 0.144 0.020 0.826 0.516 0.758 0.682 1.440 0.144 0.660 Front 0.600 0.108* 0.144* 0.016 0.868 0.543 2.040 1.110 3.150 0.315 0.858 Hotspot Top 0.000 0.108* 0.144* 0.049 0.301 0.188 0.386 0.353 0.739 0.074 0.262 SAR Bottom 1.149 0.000 0.000 0.000 1.149 0.718 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.718 Right 0.137 0.108* 0.144* 0.006 0.395 0.247 2.230 2.240 4.470 0.447 0.694 Left 0.169 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.169 0.106 2.600 2.140 4.740 0.474 0.580 Note: Worst case back and front side, left, right, and top edge power density at 2mm was used for hotspot TER analysis. Note: Some WLAN configurations were evaluated at a higher power level as a more conservative evaluation. Note: Per FCC guidance, the device edges that are not required to be evaluated are indicated 0 for TER analysis. Note: Due to SW and HW limitations, NR Band n260 was evaluated using SISO H polarization and SISO V polarization. NEAR-FIELD POWER DENSITY Approved by: FCC ID: ZNFV450VM EVALUATION REPORT Quality Manager Test Dates: DUT Type: Appendix D 03/21/19 – 05/01/19 Portable Handset Page 11 of 17

Table D-7 Phablet SAR and n261 Power Density TER Analysis 5 GHz LTE Band WLAN Ant Σ SAR S 66 (AWS) SAR/4 S/10 TER Configuratio 1 SAR (W/kg) (W/m^2) Simult Tx SAR (W/kg) n (W/kg) 1 2 1+2 a 3 b a+b Back 1.695 0.368 2.063 0.516 0.741 0.074 0.590 Front 1.846 0.140 1.986 0.497 1.250 0.125 0.622 Phablet Top 0.000 0.368* 0.368 0.092 0.469 0.047 0.139 SAR Bottom 2.655 0.000 2.655 0.664 0.000 0.000 0.664 Right 0.260 0.368* 0.628 0.157 3.500 0.350 0.507 Left 0.747 0.000 0.747 0.187 4.340 0.434 0.621 5 GHz LTE Band 2 WLAN Ant Σ SAR S (PCS) SAR SAR/4 S/10 TER Configuratio 1 SAR (W/kg) (W/m^2) Simult Tx (W/kg) n (W/kg) 1 2 1+2 a 3 b a+b Back 1.574 0.368 1.942 0.486 0.741 0.074 0.560 Front 1.877 0.140 2.017 0.504 1.250 0.125 0.629 Phablet Top 0.000 0.368* 0.368 0.092 0.469 0.047 0.139 SAR Bottom 2.367 0.000 2.367 0.592 0.000 0.000 0.592 Right 0.289 0.368* 0.657 0.164 3.500 0.350 0.514 Left 0.755 0.000 0.755 0.189 4.340 0.434 0.623 Note: Some WLAN configurations were evaluated at a higher power level as a more conservative evaluation. Note: Per FCC guidance, the device edges that are not required to be evaluated are indicated 0 for TER analysis. Note: Per FCC guidance, the bands/modes that are not required to be evaluated for phablet SAR are not considered for TER analysis. Note: Per FCC guidance, power density measurements at test separation distance of 2mm was used for phablet configuration due to probe restraints. Note: NR Band n261 was evaluated using MIMO (H+V) polarization. Note: The most conservative SAR value across distances was used for TER evaluation. NEAR-FIELD POWER DENSITY Approved by: FCC ID: ZNFV450VM EVALUATION REPORT Quality Manager Test Dates: DUT Type: Appendix D 03/21/19 – 05/01/19 Portable Handset Page 12 of 17

5 GHz LTE Band WLAN Ant Σ SAR S 66 (AWS) SAR/4 S/10 TER Configuratio 2 SAR (W/kg) (W/m^2) Simult Tx SAR (W/kg) n (W/kg) 1 2 1+2 a 3 b a+b Back 1.695 0.875 2.570 0.643 0.741 0.074 0.717 Front 1.846 0.050 1.896 0.474 1.250 0.125 0.599 Phablet Top 0.000 0.875* 0.875 0.219 0.469 0.047 0.266 SAR Bottom 2.655 0.000 2.655 0.664 0.000 0.000 0.664 Right 0.260 0.875* 1.135 0.284 3.500 0.350 0.634 Left 0.747 0.000 0.747 0.187 4.340 0.434 0.621 5 GHz LTE Band 2 WLAN Ant Σ SAR S (PCS) SAR SAR/4 S/10 TER Configuratio 2 SAR (W/kg) (W/m^2) Simult Tx (W/kg) n (W/kg) 1 2 1+2 a 3 b a+b Back 1.574 0.875 2.449 0.612 0.741 0.074 0.686 Front 1.877 0.050 1.927 0.482 1.250 0.125 0.607 Phablet Top 0.000 0.875* 0.875 0.219 0.469 0.047 0.266 SAR Bottom 2.367 0.000 2.367 0.592 0.000 0.000 0.592 Right 0.289 0.875* 1.164 0.291 3.500 0.350 0.641 Left 0.755 0.000 0.755 0.189 4.340 0.434 0.623 Note: Some WLAN configurations were evaluated at a higher power level as a more conservative evaluation. Note: Per FCC guidance, the device edges that are not required to be evaluated are indicated 0 for TER analysis. Note: Per FCC guidance, the bands/modes that are not required to be evaluated for phablet SAR are not considered for TER analysis. Note: Per FCC guidance, power density measurements at test separation distance of 2mm was used for phablet configuration due to probe restraints. Note: NR Band n261 was evaluated using MIMO (H+V) polarization. Note: The most conservative SAR value across distances was used for TER evaluation. NEAR-FIELD POWER DENSITY Approved by: FCC ID: ZNFV450VM EVALUATION REPORT Quality Manager Test Dates: DUT Type: Appendix D 03/21/19 – 05/01/19 Portable Handset Page 13 of 17

5 GHz LTE Band WLAN Σ SAR S 66 (AWS) SAR/4 S/10 TER Configuratio MIMO SAR (W/kg) (W/m^2) Simult Tx SAR (W/kg) n (W/kg) 1 2 1+2 a 3 b a+b Back 1.695 0.986 2.681 0.670 0.741 0.074 0.744 Front 1.846 0.179 2.025 0.506 1.250 0.125 0.631 Phablet Top 0.000 0.986* 0.986 0.247 0.469 0.047 0.293 SAR Bottom 2.655 0.000 2.655 0.664 0.000 0.000 0.664 Right 0.260 0.986* 1.246 0.312 3.500 0.350 0.662 Left 0.747 0.000 0.747 0.187 4.340 0.434 0.621 5 GHz LTE Band 2 WLAN Σ SAR S (PCS) SAR SAR/4 S/10 TER Configuratio MIMO SAR (W/kg) (W/m^2) Simult Tx (W/kg) n (W/kg) 1 2 1+2 a 3 b a+b Back 1.574 0.986 2.560 0.640 0.741 0.074 0.714 Front 1.877 0.179 2.056 0.514 1.250 0.125 0.639 Phablet Top 0.000 0.986* 0.986 0.247 0.469 0.047 0.293 SAR Bottom 2.367 0.000 2.367 0.592 0.000 0.000 0.592 Right 0.289 0.986* 1.275 0.319 3.500 0.350 0.669 Left 0.755 0.000 0.755 0.189 4.340 0.434 0.623 Note: Some WLAN configurations were evaluated at a higher power level as a more conservative evaluation. Note: Per FCC guidance, the device edges that are not required to be evaluated are indicated 0 for TER analysis. Note: Per FCC guidance, the bands/modes that are not required to be evaluated for phablet SAR are not considered for TER analysis. Note: Per FCC guidance, power density measurements at test separation distance of 2mm was used for phablet configuration due to probe restraints. Note: NR Band n261 was evaluated using MIMO (H+V) polarization. Note: The most conservative SAR value across distances was used for TER evaluation. NEAR-FIELD POWER DENSITY Approved by: FCC ID: ZNFV450VM EVALUATION REPORT Quality Manager Test Dates: DUT Type: Appendix D 03/21/19 – 05/01/19 Portable Handset Page 14 of 17

Table D-8 Phablet SAR and n260 Power Density TER Analysis 5 GHz LTE Band S S WLAN Ant Σ SAR ΣS 66 (AWS) SAR/4 [H] [V] S/10 TER Configuratio 1 SAR (W/kg) (W/m^2) Simult Tx SAR (W/kg) (W/m^2) (W/m^2) n (W/kg) 1 2 1+2 a 3 4 3+4 b a+b Back 1.695 0.368 2.063 0.516 0.758 0.682 1.440 0.144 0.660 Front 1.846 0.140 1.986 0.497 2.040 1.110 3.150 0.315 0.812 Phablet Top 0.000 0.368* 0.368 0.092 0.386 0.353 0.739 0.074 0.166 SAR Bottom 2.655 0.000 2.655 0.664 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.664 Right 0.260 0.368* 0.628 0.157 2.230 2.240 4.470 0.447 0.604 Left 0 0.747 0.000 0.747 0.187 2.600 2.140 4.740 0.474 0.661 5 GHz LTE Band 2 S S WLAN Ant Σ SAR ΣS (PCS) SAR SAR/4 [H] [V] S/10 TER Configuratio 1 SAR (W/kg) (W/m^2) Simult Tx (W/kg) (W/m^2) (W/m^2) n (W/kg) 1 2 1+2 a 3 4 3+4 b a+b Back 1.574 0.368 1.942 0.486 0.758 0.682 1.440 0.144 0.630 Front 1.877 0.140 2.017 0.504 2.040 1.110 3.150 0.315 0.819 Phablet Top 0.000 0.368* 0.368 0.092 0.386 0.353 0.739 0.074 0.166 SAR Bottom 2.367 0.000 2.367 0.592 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.592 Right 0.289 0.368* 0.657 0.164 2.230 2.240 4.470 0.447 0.611 Left 0.755 0.000 0.755 0.189 2.600 2.140 4.740 0.474 0.663 Note: Some WLAN configurations were evaluated at a higher power level as a more conservative evaluation. Note: Per FCC guidance, the device edges that are not required to be evaluated are indicated 0 for TER analysis. Note: Per FCC guidance, the bands/modes that are not required to be evaluated for phablet SAR are not considered for TER analysis. Note: Per FCC guidance, power density measurements at test separation distance of 2mm was used for phablet configuration due to probe restraints. Note: Due to SW and HW limitations, NR Band n260 was evaluated using SISO H polarization and SISO V polarization. Note: The most conservative SAR value across distances was used for TER evaluation. NEAR-FIELD POWER DENSITY Approved by: FCC ID: ZNFV450VM EVALUATION REPORT Quality Manager Test Dates: DUT Type: Appendix D 03/21/19 – 05/01/19 Portable Handset Page 15 of 17

5 GHz LTE Band S S WLAN Ant Σ SAR ΣS 66 (AWS) SAR/4 [H] [V] S/10 TER Configuratio 2 SAR (W/kg) (W/m^2) Simult Tx SAR (W/kg) (W/m^2) (W/m^2) n (W/kg) 1 2 1+2 a 3 4 3+4 b a+b Back 1.695 0.875 2.570 0.643 0.758 0.682 1.440 0.144 0.787 Front 1.846 0.050 1.896 0.474 2.040 1.110 3.150 0.315 0.789 Phablet Top 0.000 0.875* 0.875 0.219 0.386 0.353 0.739 0.074 0.293 SAR Bottom 2.655 0.000 2.655 0.664 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.664 Right 0.260 0.875* 1.135 0.284 2.230 2.240 4.470 0.447 0.731 Left 0 0.747 0.000 0.747 0.187 2.600 2.140 4.740 0.474 0.661 5 GHz LTE Band 2 S S WLAN Ant Σ SAR ΣS (PCS) SAR SAR/4 [H] [V] S/10 TER Configuratio 2 SAR (W/kg) (W/m^2) Simult Tx (W/kg) (W/m^2) (W/m^2) n (W/kg) 1 2 1+2 a 3 4 3+4 b a+b Back 1.574 0.875 2.449 0.612 0.758 0.682 1.440 0.144 0.756 Front 1.877 0.050 1.927 0.482 2.040 1.110 3.150 0.315 0.797 Phablet Top 0.000 0.875* 0.875 0.219 0.386 0.353 0.739 0.074 0.293 SAR Bottom 2.367 0.000 2.367 0.592 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.592 Right 0.289 0.875* 1.164 0.291 2.230 2.240 4.470 0.447 0.738 Left 0.755 0.000 0.755 0.189 2.600 2.140 4.740 0.474 0.663 Note: Some WLAN configurations were evaluated at a higher power level as a more conservative evaluation. Note: Per FCC guidance, the device edges that are not required to be evaluated are indicated 0 for TER analysis. Note: Per FCC guidance, the bands/modes that are not required to be evaluated for phablet SAR are not considered for TER analysis. Note: Per FCC guidance, power density measurements at test separation distance of 2mm was used for phablet configuration due to probe restraints. Note: Due to SW and HW limitations, NR Band n260 was evaluated using SISO H polarization and SISO V polarization. Note: The most conservative SAR value across distances was used for TER evaluation. NEAR-FIELD POWER DENSITY Approved by: FCC ID: ZNFV450VM EVALUATION REPORT Quality Manager Test Dates: DUT Type: Appendix D 03/21/19 – 05/01/19 Portable Handset Page 16 of 17

5 GHz LTE Band S S WLAN Σ SAR ΣS 66 (AWS) SAR/4 [H] [V] S/10 TER Configuratio MIMO SAR (W/kg) (W/m^2) Simult Tx SAR (W/kg) (W/m^2) (W/m^2) n (W/kg) 1 2 1+2 a 3 4 3+4 b a+b Back 1.695 0.986 2.681 0.670 0.758 0.682 1.440 0.144 0.814 Front 1.846 0.179 2.025 0.506 2.040 1.110 3.150 0.315 0.821 Phablet Top 0.000 0.986* 0.986 0.247 0.386 0.353 0.739 0.074 0.320 SAR Bottom 2.655 0.000 2.655 0.664 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.664 Right 0.260 0.986* 1.246 0.312 2.230 2.240 4.470 0.447 0.759 Left 0 0.747 0.000 0.747 0.187 2.600 2.140 4.740 0.474 0.661 5 GHz LTE Band 2 S S WLAN Σ SAR ΣS (PCS) SAR SAR/4 [H] [V] S/10 TER Configuratio MIMO SAR (W/kg) (W/m^2) Simult Tx (W/kg) (W/m^2) (W/m^2) n (W/kg) 1 2 1+2 a 3 4 3+4 b a+b Back 1.574 0.986 2.560 0.640 0.758 0.682 1.440 0.144 0.784 Front 1.877 0.179 2.056 0.514 2.040 1.110 3.150 0.315 0.829 Phablet Top 0.000 0.986* 0.986 0.247 0.386 0.353 0.739 0.074 0.320 SAR Bottom 2.367 0.000 2.367 0.592 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.592 Right 0.289 0.986* 1.275 0.319 2.230 2.240 4.470 0.447 0.766 Left 0.755 0.000 0.755 0.189 2.600 2.140 4.740 0.474 0.663 Note: Some WLAN configurations were evaluated at a higher power level as a more conservative evaluation. Note: Per FCC guidance, the device edges that are not required to be evaluated are indicated 0 for TER analysis. Note: Per FCC guidance, the bands/modes that are not required to be evaluated for phablet SAR are not considered for TER analysis. Note: Per FCC guidance, power density measurements at test separation distance of 2mm was used for phablet configuration due to probe restraints. Note: Due to SW and HW limitations, NR Band n260 was evaluated using SISO H polarization and SISO V polarization. Note: The most conservative SAR value across distances was used for TER evaluation. Simultaneous Transmission Conclusion The above numerical summed PD and SAR for all the worst-case simultaneous transmission conditions were below the TER limit. Therefore, the above analysis is sufficient to determine that simultaneous transmission cases will not exceed the TER limit and no further test cases are required. NEAR-FIELD POWER DENSITY Approved by: FCC ID: ZNFV450VM EVALUATION REPORT Quality Manager Test Dates: DUT Type: Appendix D 03/21/19 – 05/01/19 Portable Handset Page 17 of 17


Document Created: 2019-06-15 12:06:01
Document Modified: 2019-06-15 12:06:01
© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC