DFS Test Report

FCC ID: ZNFLS885

Test Report

Download: PDF
FCCID_2324711

PCTEST ENGINEERING LABORATORY, INC. 7185 Oakland Mills Road, Columbia, MD 21045 USA Tel. 410.290.6652 / Fax 410.290.6654 http://www.pctestlab.com MEASUREMENT REPORT FCC PART 15.407 DFS Company Name: Date of Testing: LG Electronics MobileComm U.S.A 6/9-6/20/2014 1000 Sylvan Avenue Test Site/Location: Englewood Cliffs, NJ 07632 PCTEST Lab. Columbia, MD, USA United States Test Report Serial No.: 0Y1406091178.ZNF FCC ID: ZNFLS885 COMPANY: LG Electronics MobileComm U.S.A Model(s): LS885, LG-LS885, LS885 EUT Type: Portable Handset Type of Device: Client Only Device, No Radar Detection Capability Frequency Range: 5260 – 5320 MHz (UNII-2A Band) 5500 – 5700 MHz (UNII-2C Band) FCC Classification: Unlicensed National Information Infrastructure (UNII) FCC Rule Part(s): Part 15.407(UNII) Class II Permissive Change: Please see FCC change document Original Grant Date: 6/9/2014 This equipment has been shown to be capable of compliance with the applicable technical standards as indicated in the measurement report and was tested in accordance with the measurement procedures specified in FCC 06-96 Appendix B Compliance Measurement Procedures for Unlicensed-National Information Infrastructure Devices Operating in the 5.25 – 5.35 GHz and 5.47 – 5.725 GHz Bands Incorporating Dynamic Frequency Selection. Test results reported herein relate only to the item(s) tested. I attest to the accuracy of data. All measurements reported herein were performed by me or were made under my supervision and are correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I assume full responsibility for the completeness of these measurements and vouch for the qualifications of all persons taking them. FCC Pt. 15.407 DFS TEST REPORT Reviewed by: FCC ID: ZNFLS885 (CLASS II PERMISSIVE CHANGE) Quality Manager Test Report S/N: Test Dates: EUT Type: Page 1 of 15 0Y1406091178.ZNF 6/9-6/20/2014 Portable Handset © 2014 PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. V 1.2 06/03/2014

T A B L E O F C O N T E N T S FCC PART 15.407 MEASUREMENT REPORT .................................................................................................. 3 1.0 INTRODUCTION......................................................................................................................................4 1.1 SCOPE ........................................................................................................................................................... 4 1.2 EVALUATION PROCEDURE ......................................................................................................................... 4 1.3 SUMMARY OF TEST RESULTS ................................................................................................................... 4 2.0 PRODUCT INFORMATION .....................................................................................................................5 2.1 EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION......................................................................................................................... 5 2.2 EUT CAPABILITIES ....................................................................................................................................... 5 2.3 MODIFICATIONS ........................................................................................................................................... 5 3.0 DESCRIPTION OF DYNAMIC FREQUENCY SELECTION TEST .........................................................6 3.1 APPLICABILITY ............................................................................................................................................. 6 3.2 REQUIREMENTS .......................................................................................................................................... 7 3.3 DFS DETECTION THRESHOLD VALUES .................................................................................................... 8 3.4 PARAMETERS OF DFS TEST SIGNALS ...................................................................................................... 8 3.5 PROCEDURE ................................................................................................................................................ 9 4.0 TEST EQUIPMENT................................................................................................................................10 4.1 ADDITIONAL EQUIPMENT ......................................................................................................................... 10 5.0 TEST RESULTS ....................................................................................................................................11 6.0 CONCLUSION .......................................................................................................................................15 FCC Pt. 15.407 DFS TEST REPORT Reviewed by: FCC ID: ZNFLS885 (CLASS II PERMISSIVE CHANGE) Quality Manager Test Report S/N: Test Dates: EUT Type: Page 2 of 15 0Y1406091178.ZNF 6/9-6/20/2014 Portable Handset © 2014 PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. V 1.2 06/03/2014

DFS MEASUREMENT REPORT FCC Part 15.407 § 2.1033 General Information APPLICANT: LG Electronics MobileComm U.S.A APPLICANT ADDRESS: 1000 Sylvan Avenue Englewood Cliffs, NJ 07632, United States TEST SITE: PCTEST ENGINEERING LABORATORY, INC. TEST SITE ADDRESS: 7185 Oakland Mills Road, Columbia, MD 21046 USA FCC RULE PART(S): Part 15.407(h) BASE MODEL: LS885 FCC ID: ZNFLS885 Test Device Serial No.: 6JUNE-1 Production Pre-Production Engineering DEVICE CLASSIFICATION: Client Only, No Radar Detection DATE(S) OF TEST: 6/9-6/20/2014 TEST REPORT S/N: 0Y1406091178.ZNF Test Facility / Accreditations Measurements were performed at PCTEST Engineering Lab located in Columbia, MD 21045, U.S.A.  PCTEST facility is an FCC registered (PCTEST Reg. No. 159966) test facility with the site description report on file and has met all the requirements specified in Section 2.948 of the FCC Rules and Industry Canada (2451B-1).  PCTEST Lab is accredited to ISO 17025 by U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) under the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP Lab code: 100431-0) in EMC, FCC and Telecommunications.  PCTEST Lab is accredited to ISO 17025-2005 by the American Association for Laboratory Accreditation (A2LA) in Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) testing, Hearing Aid Compatibility (HAC) testing, CTIA Test Plans, and wireless testing for FCC and Industry Canada Rules.  PCTEST Lab is a recognized U.S. Conformity Assessment Body (CAB) in EMC and R&TTE (n.b. 0982) under the U.S.-EU Mutual Recognition Agreement (MRA).  PCTEST TCB is a Telecommunication Certification Body (TCB) accredited to ISO/IEC Guide 65 by the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) in all scopes of FCC Rules and Industry Canada Standards (RSS).  PCTEST facility is an IC registered (2451B-1) test laboratory with the site description on file at Industry Canada.  PCTEST is a CTIA Authorized Test Laboratory (CATL) for AMPS, CDMA, and EvDO wireless devices and for Over-the-Air (OTA) Antenna Performance testing for AMPS, CDMA, GSM, GPRS, EGPRS, UMTS (W-CDMA), CDMA 1xEVDO, and CDMA 1xRTT. FCC Pt. 15.407 DFS TEST REPORT Reviewed by: FCC ID: ZNFLS885 (CLASS II PERMISSIVE CHANGE) Quality Manager Test Report S/N: Test Dates: EUT Type: Page 3 of 15 0Y1406091178.ZNF 6/9-6/20/2014 Portable Handset © 2014 PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. V 1.2 06/03/2014

1.0 I N T R O D U C T I O N 1.1 Scope This report has been prepared to demonstrate compliance with the requirements for Dynamic Frequency Selection (DFS) as stated in FCC 06-96. Testing was performed on the LG Portable Handset FCC ID: ZNFLS885 in accordance with the measurement procedure described in Appendix B of FCC 06-96. As of July 20, 2007 all devices operating in the 5250 – 5350 MHz and/or the 5470 – 5725 MHz bands must comply with the DFS requirements. As the EUT does not have radar detection capability it was evaluated as a Client Only Device. All test results reported herein are applicable to the sample selected for testing. The unit used for testing was supplied by LG Electronics MobileComm U.S.A. 1.2 Evaluation Procedure Conducted test methodology was used for the DFS evaluation procedure of the Portable Handset. No deviations to the test procedure and test methods occurred during the evaluation of the EUT. 1.3 Summary of Test Results The Portable Handset was found to be compliant with the requirements for DFS as required for a Client Device per Part 15.407(h) and FCC 06-96. The following table lists the measured parameters. The actual data and plots can be found in Section 5 and 6 of this report. Parameter Measured Limit Result Channel Move Time 615.991 ms 10 seconds Pass 5260 – 5320 MHz UNII – 2A Band < 200ms 200ms + aggregate of Channel Closing Transmission Time + 0.025 ms 60ms over remaining Pass (aggregate) 10 second period Monitored > 30 minutes Non-occupancy Period 30 minutes Pass (No transmission occurred) Channel Move Time 640.832 ms 10 seconds Pass 5470 – 5725 MHz UNII – 2C Band < 200ms 200ms + aggregate of Channel Closing Transmission Time + 0.012 ms 60ms over remaining Pass (aggregate) 10 second period Monitored > 30 minutes Non-occupancy Period 30 minutes Pass (No transmission occurred) Table 1-1. DFS Test Results Summary FCC Pt. 15.407 DFS TEST REPORT Reviewed by: FCC ID: ZNFLS885 (CLASS II PERMISSIVE CHANGE) Quality Manager Test Report S/N: Test Dates: EUT Type: Page 4 of 15 0Y1406091178.ZNF 6/9-6/20/2014 Portable Handset © 2014 PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. V 1.2 06/03/2014

2.0 P R O D U C T I N F O R M A T I O N 2.1 Equipment Description The Equipment Under Test (EUT) is the LG Portable Handset FCC ID: ZNFLS885. Mode of Operation: Master Device Client Device (No radar detection) Client Device with Radar Detection Parameters of EUT: 5260 – 5320 MHz Frequency 5500 – 5700 MHz 21.086 mW (13.24 dBm) Conducted (802.11a UNII Band 2A) Output Power: 23.605 mW (13.73 dBm) Conducted (802.11a UNII Band 2C) Modulation: OFDM Channel Bandwidth: 20, 40 MHz 2.2 EUT Capabilities This device contains the following capabilities: 850/1900 CDMA (BC0, BC1, BC10), Multi-band LTE, 802.11a/b/g/n WLAN, 802.11a/n UNII, Bluetooth (1x, EDR, LE) 2.3 Modifications No modifications to the EUT were required in order to comply with the DFS specifications. FCC Pt. 15.407 DFS TEST REPORT Reviewed by: FCC ID: ZNFLS885 (CLASS II PERMISSIVE CHANGE) Quality Manager Test Report S/N: Test Dates: EUT Type: Page 5 of 15 0Y1406091178.ZNF 6/9-6/20/2014 Portable Handset © 2014 PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. V 1.2 06/03/2014

3.0 D E S C R I P T I O N O F D Y N A M I C F R E Q U E N C Y S E L E C T I O N T E S T 3.1 Applicability The following table from FCC 06-96 lists the applicable requirements for the DFS testing. The device evaluated in this report is considered a client device without radar detection capability. Requirement Operational Mode Client Without Client With Radar Master Radar Detection Detection Non-Occupancy Period Yes Not required Yes DFS Detection Threshold Yes Not required Yes Channel Availability Check Time Yes Not required Not required Uniform Spreading Yes Not required Not required U-NII Detection Bandwidth Yes Not required Yes Table 3-1. DFS Applicability Requirement Operational Mode Client Client Master Without Radar With Radar Detection Detection DFS Detection Threshold Yes Not required Yes Channel Closing Transmission Time Yes Yes Yes Channel Move Time Yes Yes Yes U-NII Detection Bandwidth Yes Not required Yes Client Beacon Test N/A Yes Yes Table 3-2. DFS Applicability During Normal Operation FCC Pt. 15.407 DFS TEST REPORT Reviewed by: FCC ID: ZNFLS885 (CLASS II PERMISSIVE CHANGE) Quality Manager Test Report S/N: Test Dates: EUT Type: Page 6 of 15 0Y1406091178.ZNF 6/9-6/20/2014 Portable Handset © 2014 PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. V 1.2 06/03/2014

3.2 Requirements Per FCC 06-96 the following are the requirements for Client Devices: a) A Client Device will not transmit before having received appropriate control signals from a Master Device. b) A Client Device will stop all its transmissions whenever instructed by a Master Device to which it is associated and will meet the Channel Move Time and Channel Closing Transmission Time requirements. The Client Device will not resume any transmissions until it has again received control signals from a Master Device. c) If a Client Device is performing In-Service Monitoring and detects a Radar Waveform above the DFS Detection Threshold, it will inform the Master Device. This is equivalent to the Master Device detecting the Radar Waveform and d) through f) of section 5.1.1 apply. d) Irrespective of Client Device or Master Device detection the Channel Move Time and Channel Closing Transmission Time requirements remain the same. Channel Move Time and Channel Closing Transmission Time requirements are listed in the following table. Parameter Value Non-occupancy period Minimum 30 minutes Channel Availability Check Time 60 seconds 10 seconds Channel Move Time See Note 1. Channel Closing Transmission Time 200 milliseconds + an aggregate of 60 milliseconds over remaining 10 second period. See Notes 1 and 2. Minimum 80% of the U- U-NII Detection Bandwidth NII 99% transmission power bandwidth. See Note 3. Note 1: The instant that the Channel Move Time and the Channel Closing Transmission Time begins is as follows: • For the Short Pulse Radar Test Signals this instant is the end of the Burst. • For the Frequency Hopping radar Test Signal, this instant is the end of the last radar Burst generated. • For the Long Pulse Radar Test Signal this instant is the end of the 12 second period defining the Radar Waveform. Note 2: The Channel Closing Transmission Time is comprised of 200 milliseconds starting at the beginning of the Channel Move Time plus any additional intermittent control signals required to facilitate a Channel move (an aggregate of 60 milliseconds) during the remainder of the 10 second period. The aggregate duration of control signals will not count quiet periods in between transmissions. Note 3: During the U-NII Detection Bandwidth detection test, radar type 1 is used and for each frequency step the minimum percentage of detection is 90 percent. Measurements are performed with no data traffic. Table 3-3: DFS Response Requirements FCC Pt. 15.407 DFS TEST REPORT Reviewed by: FCC ID: ZNFLS885 (CLASS II PERMISSIVE CHANGE) Quality Manager Test Report S/N: Test Dates: EUT Type: Page 7 of 15 0Y1406091178.ZNF 6/9-6/20/2014 Portable Handset © 2014 PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. V 1.2 06/03/2014

3.3 DFS Detection Threshold Values The DFS detection thresholds are defined for Master devices and Client Devices with In-service monitoring. These detection thresholds are listed in the following table. Value Maximum Transmit Power (See Notes 1 and 2) ≥ 200 milliwatt -64 dBm < 200 milliwatt -62 dBm Note 1: This is the level at the input of the receiver assuming a 0 dBi receive antenna. Note 2: Throughout these test procedures an additional 1 dB has been added to the amplitude of the test transmission waveforms to account for variations in measurement equipment. This will ensure that the test signal is at or above the detection threshold level to trigger a DFS response. Table 3-4: Detection Thresholds for Master Devices and Client Devices with Radar Detection 3.4 Parameters of DFS Test Signals As the EUT is a Client Device with no Radar Detection only one type radar pulse is required for the testing. Radar Pulse type 1 was used in the evaluation of the Client device for the purpose of measuring the Channel Move Time and the Channel Closing Transmission Time. Table 3-5 lists the parameters for the Short Pulse Radar Waveforms. A plot of the Radar Pulse Type 1 used for testing is included in Section 5.0 of this report. Minimum Number Minimum Pulse Width PRI Percentage of Radar Type of Number of (μsec) (μsec) Successful Pulses Trials Detection 1 1 1428 18 60% 30 2 1-5 150-230 23-29 60% 30 3 6-10 200-500 16-18 60% 30 4 11-20 200-500 12-16 60% 30 Aggregate (Radar Types 1-4) 80% 120 Table 3-5: Parameters for Short Pulse Radar Waveforms Minimum Pulse Chirp Number Minimum Radar PRI Number Percentage of Width Width of Pulses Number of Type (μsec) of Bursts Successful (μsec) (MHz) per Burst Trials Detection 5 50 - 100 5 - 20 5 – 20 1-3 8 - 20 60% 30 Table 3-6. Parameters for Long Pulse Radar Waveforms FCC Pt. 15.407 DFS TEST REPORT Reviewed by: FCC ID: ZNFLS885 (CLASS II PERMISSIVE CHANGE) Quality Manager Test Report S/N: Test Dates: EUT Type: Page 8 of 15 0Y1406091178.ZNF 6/9-6/20/2014 Portable Handset © 2014 PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. V 1.2 06/03/2014

Hopping Minimum Minimum Pulse Pulses Hopping Radar PRI Sequence Percentage of Number Width per Rate Type (μsec) Length Successful of (μsec) Hop (kHz) (msec) Detection Trials 6 1 333 9 0.333 300 70% 30 Table 3-7. Parameters for Frequency Hopping Radar Waveforms 3.5 Procedure The FCC 06-96 describes a radiated test setup and a conducted test setup. The conducted test setup was used for this testing. Figure 3-1 shows the typical test setup. In Band 2A, one channel selected between 5260 and 5350 MHz is chosen for the testing. In Band 2C, one channel selected between 5500 and 5700 MHz was chosen for testing. Figure 3-1. Conducted Test Setup for DFS 1. The “Aeroflex PXI DFS Radar Simulator and Analyzer Test Suite” is setup to provide a simulated radar pulse at the frequency that the Master and Client are operating. A Type 1 radar pulse was used. 2. The Client Device (EUT) is set up per the diagram in Figure 3-1 and communications between the Master device and the Client is established. 3. The MPEG file specified by the FCC (“6 ½ Magic Hours”) is streamed from the “file computer” through the Master to the Slave Device and played in full motion video using Media Player Classic Ver. 6.4.8.6 in order to properly load the network. 4. The “Aeroflex PXI DFS Radar Simulator and Analyzer Test Suite” is set to record and display 12 seconds of time, starting from where the simulated radar is generated. This time domain plot captures any transmissions occurring up to and after 10sec. Aggregate time is also computed per FCC 06-98 to ensure compliance. (Note: the channel may be different since the Master and Client have changed channels due to the detection of the initial radar pulse.) 5. After the initial radar burst the channel is monitored for 30 minutes to ensure no transmissions or beacons occur. A second monitoring setup is used to verify that the Master and Client have both moved to different channels. FCC Pt. 15.407 DFS TEST REPORT Reviewed by: FCC ID: ZNFLS885 (CLASS II PERMISSIVE CHANGE) Quality Manager Test Report S/N: Test Dates: EUT Type: Page 9 of 15 0Y1406091178.ZNF 6/9-6/20/2014 Portable Handset © 2014 PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. V 1.2 06/03/2014

4.0 T E S T E Q U I P M E N T Test Equipment Calibration is traceable to the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). Manufacturer Model Description Cal Date Cal Interval Cal Due Serial Number Agilent E4448A PSA (3Hz‐50GHz) Spectrum Analyzer 4/16/2014 Annual 4/16/2015 US42510244 Agilent E8267C Vector Signal Generator 10/31/2013 Biennial 10/31/2015 US42340152 Aeroflex PXI 82531 PXI DFS Radar Simulator & Analyzer 12/20/2013 Annual 12/20/2014 1082329 Table 4-1. Annual Test Equipment Calibration Schedule 4.1 Additional Equipment The following equipment was used in support of the DFS testing. Device Manufacturer Model/Description Description S/N: FCC ID: Aironet AIR- Master Cisco Systems Access Point FTX1114B151 LDK102056 AP1242AG-A-K9 Table 4-2. Support Equipment FCC Pt. 15.407 DFS TEST REPORT Reviewed by: FCC ID: ZNFLS885 (CLASS II PERMISSIVE CHANGE) Quality Manager Test Report S/N: Test Dates: EUT Type: Page 10 of 15 0Y1406091178.ZNF 6/9-6/20/2014 Portable Handset © 2014 PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. V 1.2 06/03/2014

5.0 T E S T R E S U L T S Move Time and Aggregate Time Notes: 1. Trigger Threshold was configured to only capture client pulses. The pulses shown in the plots below have been determined to be from the Master AP. 2. Marker Info and Aggregate time results are shown on the right side of the plots below. Figure 5-1. Band 2A Move Time and Aggregate Time FCC Pt. 15.407 DFS TEST REPORT Reviewed by: FCC ID: ZNFLS885 (CLASS II PERMISSIVE CHANGE) Quality Manager Test Report S/N: Test Dates: EUT Type: Page 11 of 15 0Y1406091178.ZNF 6/9-6/20/2014 Portable Handset © 2014 PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. V 1.2 06/03/2014

Figure 5-2. Band 2C Move Time and Aggregate Time FCC Pt. 15.407 DFS TEST REPORT Reviewed by: FCC ID: ZNFLS885 (CLASS II PERMISSIVE CHANGE) Quality Manager Test Report S/N: Test Dates: EUT Type: Page 12 of 15 0Y1406091178.ZNF 6/9-6/20/2014 Portable Handset © 2014 PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. V 1.2 06/03/2014

Figure 5-3. Band 2A Non-occupancy Period - Monitoring live spectrum - Elapse time 30 minutes FCC Pt. 15.407 DFS TEST REPORT Reviewed by: FCC ID: ZNFLS885 (CLASS II PERMISSIVE CHANGE) Quality Manager Test Report S/N: Test Dates: EUT Type: Page 13 of 15 0Y1406091178.ZNF 6/9-6/20/2014 Portable Handset © 2014 PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. V 1.2 06/03/2014

Figure 5-4. Band 2C Non-occupancy Period - Monitoring live spectrum - Elapse time 30 minutes FCC Pt. 15.407 DFS TEST REPORT Reviewed by: FCC ID: ZNFLS885 (CLASS II PERMISSIVE CHANGE) Quality Manager Test Report S/N: Test Dates: EUT Type: Page 14 of 15 0Y1406091178.ZNF 6/9-6/20/2014 Portable Handset © 2014 PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. V 1.2 06/03/2014

6.0 C O N C L U S I O N The data collected relate only to the item(s) tested and show that the LG Portable Handset FCC ID: ZNFLS885 is in compliance with the DFS requirements for a Client Device without radar detection in accordance with Part 15.407 of the FCC Rules. FCC Pt. 15.407 DFS TEST REPORT Reviewed by: FCC ID: ZNFLS885 (CLASS II PERMISSIVE CHANGE) Quality Manager Test Report S/N: Test Dates: EUT Type: Page 15 of 15 0Y1406091178.ZNF 6/9-6/20/2014 Portable Handset © 2014 PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. V 1.2 06/03/2014


Document Created: 2019-10-24 12:55:00
Document Modified: 2019-10-24 12:55:00
© 2025 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC