RF Exposure Info

FCC ID: ZNFH932

RF Exposure Info

Download: PDF
FCCID_3611242

PCTEST ENGINEERING LABORATORY, INC. 7185 Oakland Mills Road, Columbia, MD 21046 USA Tel. +1.410.290.6652 / Fax +1.410.290.6654 http://www.pctest.com SAR EVALUATION REPORT Applicant Name: Date of Testing: LG Electronics MobileComm U.S.A., Inc. 10/5/2017 1000 Sylvan Avenue Test Site/Location: Englewood Cliffs, NJ 07632 PCTEST Lab, Columbia, MD, USA United States Document Serial No.: 1M1710060269-01.ZNF F CC I D: ZNFH932 APPL I C A NT : LG ELECTRONICS MOBILECOMM U.S.A., INC. DUT Type: Portable Handset Application Type: Class II Permissive Change FCC Rule Part(s): CFR §2.1093 Model: LG-H932 Additional Model(s): LGH932, H932, LG-H932PR, LGH932PR, H932PR Permissive Change(s): Enabling TDWR channels Note: The following test data was evaluated for the current test report. Please refer to RF Exposure Technical Report S/N 1M1707110215-01-R1.ZNF for original compliance evaluation. This wireless portable device has been shown to be capable of compliance for localized specific absorption rate (SAR) for uncontrolled environment/general population exposure limits specified in ANSI/IEEE C95.1-1992 and has been tested in accordance with the measurement procedures specified in Section 1.4 of this report; for North American frequency bands only. I attest to the accuracy of data. All measurements reported herein were performed by me or were made under my supervision and are correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I assume full responsibility for the completeness of these measurements and vouch for the qualifications of all persons taking them. Test results reported herein relate only to the item(s) tested. The SAR Tick is an initiative of the Mobile Manufacturers Forum (MMF). While a product may be considered eligible, use of the SAR Tick logo requires an agreement with the MMF. Further details can be obtained by emailing: sartick@mmfai.info. Approved by: FCC ID: ZNFH932 SAR EVALUATION REPORT Quality Manager Document S/N: Test Dates: DUT Type: Page 1 of 11 1M1710060269-01.ZNF 10/5/2017 Portable Handset © 2017 PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. REV 19.0 M 09/15/2017 © 2017 PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. All rights reserved. Unless otherwise specified, no part of this report may be reproduced or utilized in any part, form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and microfilm, without permission in writing from PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. If you have any questions about this international copyright or have an enquiry about obtaining additional rights to this report or assembly of contents thereof, please contact INFO@PCTEST.COM.

T A B L E O F C O N T E N T S 1 DEVICE UNDER TEST ................................................................................................................................ 3 2 FCC MEASUREMENT PROCEDURES ....................................................................................................... 5 3 RF CONDUCTED POWERS ........................................................................................................................ 6 4 EQUIPMENT LIST ........................................................................................................................................ 8 5 CONCLUSION .............................................................................................................................................. 9 6 REFERENCES ........................................................................................................................................... 10 Approved by: FCC ID: ZNFH932 SAR EVALUATION REPORT Quality Manager Document S/N: Test Dates: DUT Type: Page 2 of 11 1M1710060269-01.ZNF 10/5/2017 Portable Handset © 2017 PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. REV 19.0 M 09/15/2017 © 2017 PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. All rights reserved. Unless otherwise specified, no part of this report may be reproduced or utilized in any part, form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and microfilm, without permission in writing from PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. If you have any questions about this international copyright or have an enquiry about obtaining additional rights to this report or assembly of contents thereof, please contact INFO@PCTEST.COM.

1 DEVICE UNDER TEST 1.1 Device Overview Band & Mode Operating Modes Tx Frequency GSM/GPRS/EDGE 850 Voice/Data 824.20 - 848.80 MHz GSM/GPRS/EDGE 1900 Voice/Data 1850.20 - 1909.80 MHz UMTS 850 Voice/Data 826.40 - 846.60 MHz UMTS 1750 Voice/Data 1712.4 - 1752.6 MHz UMTS 1900 Voice/Data 1852.4 - 1907.6 MHz LTE Band 71 Voice/Data 665.5 - 695.5 MHz LTE Band 12 Voice/Data 699.7 - 715.3 MHz LTE Band 5 (Cell) Voice/Data 824.7 - 848.3 MHz LTE Band 66 (AWS) Voice/Data 1710.7 - 1779.3 MHz LTE Band 4 (AWS) Voice/Data 1710.7 - 1754.3 MHz LTE Band 2 (PCS) Voice/Data 1850.7 - 1909.3 MHz LTE Band 41 Voice/Data 2498.5 - 2687.5 MHz 2.4 GHz WLAN Voice/Data 2412 - 2462 MHz U-NII-1 Voice/Data 5180 - 5240 MHz U-NII-2A Voice/Data 5260 - 5320 MHz U-NII-2C Voice/Data 5500 - 5720 MHz U-NII-3 Voice/Data 5745 - 5825 MHz Bluetooth Data 2402 - 2480 MHz NFC Data 13.56 MHz Approved by: FCC ID: ZNFH932 SAR EVALUATION REPORT Quality Manager Document S/N: Test Dates: DUT Type: Page 3 of 11 1M1710060269-01.ZNF 10/5/2017 Portable Handset © 2017 PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. REV 19.0 M 09/15/2017 © 2017 PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. All rights reserved. Unless otherwise specified, no part of this report may be reproduced or utilized in any part, form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and microfilm, without permission in writing from PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. If you have any questions about this international copyright or have an enquiry about obtaining additional rights to this report or assembly of contents thereof, please contact INFO@PCTEST.COM.

1.2 Nominal and Maximum Output Power Specifications This device operates using the following maximum and nominal output power specifications for 5 GHz WLAN. See RF Exposure Technical Report S/N 1M1707110215-01-R1.ZNF for complete maximum and nominal output power specifications. Modulated Average ‐ Single Tx Chain Modulated Average ‐ MIMO (dBm) (dBm) 40 MHz Bandwidth Mode / Band Antenna 1 Antenna 2 MIMO Ch 62, Ch 110 ‐ Ch 62, Ch 110 ‐ Ch 62, Ch 110 ‐ Ch 38 Ch 46, 54 Ch 38 Ch 46, 54 Ch 38 Ch 46, 54 102 159 102 159 102 159 Maximum 14.0 16.0 14.0 16.0 13.5 15.5 13.5 15.5 16.7 18.7 16.7 18.7 IEEE 802.11n (5 GHz) Nominal 13.0 15.0 13.0 15.0 12.5 14.5 12.5 14.5 15.7 17.7 15.7 17.7 Maximum 14.0 16.0 14.0 16.0 13.5 15.5 13.5 15.5 16.7 18.7 16.7 18.7 IEEE 802.11ac (5 GHz) Nominal 13.0 15.0 13.0 15.0 12.5 14.5 12.5 14.5 15.7 17.7 15.7 17.7 Modulated Average ‐ Single Tx Chain Modulated Average ‐ MIMO (dBm) (dBm) 80 MHz Bandwidth Mode / Band Antenna 1 Antenna 2 MIMO Ch 106 ‐ Ch 106 ‐ Ch 106 ‐ Ch 42 Ch 58 Ch 42 Ch 58 Ch 42 Ch 58 155 155 155 Maximum 13.0 11.0 13.0 12.5 10.5 12.5 15.7 13.7 15.7 IEEE 802.11ac (5 GHz) Nominal 12.0 10.0 12.0 11.5 9.5 11.5 14.7 12.7 14.7 1.3 SAR Test Exclusion Additional SAR measurements were not required based on the conducted power measurements and the SAR Test configuration and channel selection requirements outlined in FCC KDB 248227 D01v02r02, Section 5. Please see RF Exposure Technical Report S/N 1M1707110215-01-R1.ZNF for full SAR compliance evaluation. 1.4 Guidance Applied  IEEE 1528-2013  FCC KDB Publication 248227 D01v02r02 (SAR Considerations for 802.11 Devices)  FCC KDB Publication 447498 D01v06 (General SAR Guidance)  FCC KDB Publication 865664 D01v01r04, D02v01r02 (SAR Measurements up to 6 GHz) Approved by: FCC ID: ZNFH932 SAR EVALUATION REPORT Quality Manager Document S/N: Test Dates: DUT Type: Page 4 of 11 1M1710060269-01.ZNF 10/5/2017 Portable Handset © 2017 PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. REV 19.0 M 09/15/2017 © 2017 PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. All rights reserved. Unless otherwise specified, no part of this report may be reproduced or utilized in any part, form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and microfilm, without permission in writing from PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. If you have any questions about this international copyright or have an enquiry about obtaining additional rights to this report or assembly of contents thereof, please contact INFO@PCTEST.COM.

2 FCC MEASUREMENT PROCEDURES 2.1 SAR Testing with 802.11 Transmitters The normal network operating configurations of 802.11 transmitters are not suitable for SAR measurements. Unpredictable fluctuations in network traffic and antenna diversity conditions can introduce undesirable variations in SAR results. The SAR for these devices should be measured using chipset based test mode software to ensure the results are consistent and reliable. See KDB Publication 248227 D01v02r02 for more details. 2.1.1 General Device Setup Chipset based test mode software is hardware dependent and generally varies among manufacturers. The device operating parameters established in test mode for SAR measurements must be identical to those programmed in production units, including output power levels, amplifier gain settings and other RF performance tuning parameters. A periodic duty factor is required for current generation SAR systems to measure SAR. When 802.11 frame gaps are accounted for in the transmission, a maximum transmission duty factor of 92 - 96% is typically achievable in most test mode configurations. A minimum transmission duty factor of 85% is required to avoid certain hardware and device implementation issues related to wide range SAR scaling. The reported SAR is scaled to 100% transmission duty factor to determine compliance at the maximum tune-up tolerance limit. 2.1.2 U-NII-1 and U-NII-2A For devices that operate in both U-NII-1 and U-NII-2A bands, when the same maximum output power is specified for both bands, SAR measurement using OFDM SAR test procedures is not required for U-NII-1 unless the highest reported SAR for U-NII-2A is > 1.2 W/kg. When different maximum output powers are specified for the bands, SAR measurement for the U-NII band with the lower maximum output power is not required unless the highest reported SAR for the U-NII band with the higher maximum output power, adjusted by the ratio of lower to higher specified maximum output power for the two bands, is > 1.2 W/kg. When 10g SAR measurement is considered, a factor of 2.5 is applied to the thresholds above. 2.1.3 U-NII-2C and U-NII-3 The frequency range covered by U-NII-2C and U-NII-3 is 380 MHz (5.47 – 5.85 GHz), which requires a minimum of at least two SAR probe calibration frequency points to support SAR measurements. When Terminal Doppler Weather Radar (TDWR) restriction applies, the channels at 5.60 – 5.65 GHz in U-NII-2C band must be disabled with acceptable mechanisms and documented in the equipment certification. Unless band gap channels are permanently disabled, SAR must be considered for these channels. Each band is tested independently according to the normally required OFDM SAR measurement and probe calibration frequency points requirements. Approved by: FCC ID: ZNFH932 SAR EVALUATION REPORT Quality Manager Document S/N: Test Dates: DUT Type: Page 5 of 11 1M1710060269-01.ZNF 10/5/2017 Portable Handset © 2017 PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. REV 19.0 M 09/15/2017 © 2017 PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. All rights reserved. Unless otherwise specified, no part of this report may be reproduced or utilized in any part, form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and microfilm, without permission in writing from PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. If you have any questions about this international copyright or have an enquiry about obtaining additional rights to this report or assembly of contents thereof, please contact INFO@PCTEST.COM.

3 RF CONDUCTED POWERS 3.1 WLAN Conducted Powers Table 3-1 5 GHz WLAN Ant 1 Maximum RF Power 5GHz (20MHz) Conducted Power [dBm] IEEE Transmission Mode Freq [MHz] Channel 802.11a 802.11n 802.11ac 5180 36 16.85 16.71 16.70 5200 40 16.84 16.69 16.65 5220 44 16.84 16.65 16.61 5240 48 16.71 16.59 16.52 5260 52 16.73 16.62 16.50 5280 56 16.90 16.74 16.71 5300 60 16.72 16.57 16.48 5320 64 16.76 16.63 16.53 5500 100 16.57 16.38 16.33 5580 116 16.38 16.17 16.19 5600 120 16.49 16.33 16.33 5620 124 16.57 16.35 16.36 5640 128 16.44 16.33 16.31 5660 132 16.48 16.33 16.34 5720 144 16.49 16.32 16.29 5745 149 16.55 16.39 16.40 5785 157 16.28 16.13 16.12 5825 165 16.30 16.14 16.14 Table 3-2 5 GHz WLAN Ant 2 Maximum RF Power 5GHz (20MHz) Conducted Power [dBm] IEEE Transmission Mode Freq [MHz] Channel 802.11a 802.11n 802.11ac 5180 36 16.06 15.85 15.81 5200 40 16.19 16.03 15.98 5220 44 16.10 15.92 15.91 5240 48 16.31 16.17 16.15 5260 52 16.27 16.11 16.07 5280 56 16.07 15.92 15.86 5300 60 16.25 16.07 16.09 5320 64 16.16 16.00 16.02 5500 100 16.01 15.87 15.85 5580 116 16.24 16.08 16.08 5600 120 16.01 15.83 15.81 5620 124 15.97 15.68 15.67 5640 128 15.75 15.57 15.55 5660 132 16.20 16.05 16.02 5720 144 16.16 15.98 16.00 5745 149 16.29 16.13 16.13 5785 157 16.31 16.13 16.12 5825 165 16.25 16.13 16.11 Approved by: FCC ID: ZNFH932 SAR EVALUATION REPORT Quality Manager Document S/N: Test Dates: DUT Type: Page 6 of 11 1M1710060269-01.ZNF 10/5/2017 Portable Handset © 2017 PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. REV 19.0 M 09/15/2017 © 2017 PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. All rights reserved. Unless otherwise specified, no part of this report may be reproduced or utilized in any part, form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and microfilm, without permission in writing from PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. If you have any questions about this international copyright or have an enquiry about obtaining additional rights to this report or assembly of contents thereof, please contact INFO@PCTEST.COM.

Table 3-3 5 GHz WLAN MIMO 802.11n Maximum Average RF Power 5GHz (20MHz) Conducted Power [dBm] Freq [MHz] Channel ANT1 ANT2 MIMO 5180 36 16.71 15.85 19.31 5200 40 16.69 16.03 19.38 5220 44 16.65 15.92 19.31 5240 48 16.59 16.17 19.40 5260 52 16.62 16.11 19.38 5280 56 16.74 15.92 19.36 5300 60 16.57 16.07 19.34 5320 64 16.63 16.00 19.34 5500 100 16.38 15.87 19.14 5580 116 16.17 16.08 19.14 5600 120 16.33 15.83 19.10 5620 124 16.35 15.68 19.04 5640 128 16.33 15.57 18.98 5660 132 16.33 16.05 19.20 5720 144 16.32 15.98 19.16 5745 149 16.39 16.13 19.27 5785 157 16.13 16.13 19.14 5825 165 16.14 16.13 19.15 Justification for test configurations for WLAN per KDB Publication 248227 D01v02r02:  Power measurements were performed for the transmission mode configuration with the highest maximum output power specified for production units.  For transmission modes with the same maximum output power specification, powers were measured for the largest channel bandwidth, lowest order modulation and lowest data rate.  For transmission modes with identical maximum specified output power, channel bandwidth, modulation and data rates, power measurements were required for all identical configurations.  For each transmission mode configuration, powers were measured for the highest and lowest channels; and at the mid-band channel(s) when there were at least 3 channels supported. For configurations with multiple mid-band channels, due to an even number of channels, both channels were measured. Additional channels were evaluated for conducted power measurements per manufacturer request. Figure 3-1 Power Measurement Setup Approved by: FCC ID: ZNFH932 SAR EVALUATION REPORT Quality Manager Document S/N: Test Dates: DUT Type: Page 7 of 11 1M1710060269-01.ZNF 10/5/2017 Portable Handset © 2017 PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. REV 19.0 M 09/15/2017 © 2017 PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. All rights reserved. Unless otherwise specified, no part of this report may be reproduced or utilized in any part, form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and microfilm, without permission in writing from PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. If you have any questions about this international copyright or have an enquiry about obtaining additional rights to this report or assembly of contents thereof, please contact INFO@PCTEST.COM.

4 EQUIPMENT LIST Manufacturer Model Description Cal Date Cal Interval Cal Due Serial Number Mini‐Circuits BW‐N20W5 Power Attenuator CBT N/A CBT 1226 Anritsu ML2495A Power Meter 10/16/2015 Biennial 10/16/2017 941001 Anritsu MA2411B Pulse Power Sensor 2/10/2017 Annual 2/10/2018 1339018 Seekonk NC‐100 Torque Wrench 11/6/2015 Biennial 11/6/2017 22313 CBT (Calibrated Before Testing). Prior to testing, the measurement paths containing a cable, amplifier, attenuator, coupler or filter were connected to a calibrated source (i.e. a signal generator) to determine the losses of the measurement path. The power meter offset was then adjusted to compensate for the measurement system losses. This level offset is stored within the power meter before measurements are made. This calibration verification procedure applies to the system verification and output power measurements. The calibrated reading is then taken directly from the power meter after compensation of the losses for all final power measurements. Approved by: FCC ID: ZNFH932 SAR EVALUATION REPORT Quality Manager Document S/N: Test Dates: DUT Type: Page 8 of 11 1M1710060269-01.ZNF 10/5/2017 Portable Handset © 2017 PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. REV 19.0 M 09/15/2017 © 2017 PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. All rights reserved. Unless otherwise specified, no part of this report may be reproduced or utilized in any part, form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and microfilm, without permission in writing from PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. If you have any questions about this international copyright or have an enquiry about obtaining additional rights to this report or assembly of contents thereof, please contact INFO@PCTEST.COM.

5 CONCLUSION 5.1 Measurement Conclusion The SAR evaluation indicates that the EUT complies with the RF radiation exposure limits of the FCC and Innovation, Science, and Economic Development Canada, with respect to all parameters subject to this test. These measurements were taken to simulate the RF effects of RF exposure under worst-case conditions. Precise laboratory measures were taken to assure repeatability of the tests. The results and statements relate only to the item(s) tested. Please note that the absorption and distribution of electromagnetic energy in the body are very complex phenomena that depend on the mass, shape, and size of the body, the orientation of the body with respect to the field vectors, and the electrical properties of both the body and the environment. Other variables that may play a substantial role in possible biological effects are those that characterize the environment (e.g. ambient temperature, air velocity, relative humidity, and body insulation) and those that characterize the individual (e.g. age, gender, activity level, debilitation, or disease). Because various factors may interact with one another to vary the specific biological outcome of an exposure to electromagnetic fields, any protection guide should consider maximal amplification of biological effects as a result of field-body interactions, environmental conditions, and physiological variables. [3] Approved by: FCC ID: ZNFH932 SAR EVALUATION REPORT Quality Manager Document S/N: Test Dates: DUT Type: Page 9 of 11 1M1710060269-01.ZNF 10/5/2017 Portable Handset © 2017 PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. REV 19.0 M 09/15/2017 © 2017 PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. All rights reserved. Unless otherwise specified, no part of this report may be reproduced or utilized in any part, form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and microfilm, without permission in writing from PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. If you have any questions about this international copyright or have an enquiry about obtaining additional rights to this report or assembly of contents thereof, please contact INFO@PCTEST.COM.

6 REFERENCES [1] Federal Communications Commission, ET Docket 93-62, Guidelines for Evaluating the Environmental Effects of Radiofrequency Radiation, Aug. 1996. [2] ANSI/IEEE C95.1-2005, American National Standard safety levels with respect to human exposure to radio frequency electromagnetic fields, 3kHz to 300GHz, New York: IEEE, 2006. [3] ANSI/IEEE C95.1-1992, American National Standard safety levels with respect to human exposure to radio frequency electromagnetic fields, 3kHz to 300GHz, New York: IEEE, Sept. 1992. [4] ANSI/IEEE C95.3-2002, IEEE Recommended Practice for the Measurement of Potentially Hazardous Electromagnetic Fields - RF and Microwave, New York: IEEE, December 2002. [5] IEEE Standards Coordinating Committee 39 –Standards Coordinating Committee 34 – IEEE Std. 1528-2013, IEEE Recommended Practice for Determining the Peak Spatial-Average Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) in the Human Head from Wireless Communications Devices: Measurement Techniques. [6] NCRP, National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements, Biological Effects and Exposure Criteria for RadioFrequency Electromagnetic Fields, NCRP Report No. 86, 1986. Reprinted Feb. 1995. [7] T. Schmid, O. Egger, N. Kuster, Automated E-field scanning system for dosimetric assessments, IEEE Transaction on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 44, Jan. 1996, pp. 105-113. [8] K. Pokovic, T. Schmid, N. Kuster, Robust setup for precise calibration of E-field probes in tissue simulating liquids at mobile communications frequencies, ICECOM97, Oct. 1997, pp. 1 -124. [9] K. Pokovic, T. Schmid, and N. Kuster, E-field Probe with improved isotropy in brain simulating liquids, Proceedings of the ELMAR, Zadar, Croatia, June 23-25, 1996, pp. 172-175. [10] Schmid & Partner Engineering AG, Application Note: Data Storage and Evaluation, June 1998, p2. [11] V. Hombach, K. Meier, M. Burkhardt, E. Kuhn, N. Kuster, The Dependence of EM Energy Absorption upon Human Modeling at 900 MHz, IEEE Transaction on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 44 no. 10, Oct. 1996, pp. 1865- 1873. [12] N. Kuster and Q. Balzano, Energy absorption mechanism by biological bodies in the near field of dipole antennas above 300MHz, IEEE Transaction on Vehicular Technology, vol. 41, no. 1, Feb. 1992, pp. 17-23. [13] G. Hartsgrove, A. Kraszewski, A. Surowiec, Simulated Biological Materials for Electromagnetic Radiation Absorption Studies, University of Ottawa, Bioelectromagnetics, Canada: 1987, pp. 29-36. [14] Q. Balzano, O. Garay, T. Manning Jr., Electromagnetic Energy Exposure of Simulated Users of Portable Cellular Telephones, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 44, no.3, Aug. 1995. [15] W. Gander, Computermathematick, Birkhaeuser, Basel, 1992. [16] W.H. Press, S.A. Teukolsky, W.T. Vetterling, and B.P. Flannery, Numerical Recipes in C, The Art of Scientific Computing, Second edition, Cambridge University Press, 1992. [17] N. Kuster, R. Kastle, T. Schmid, Dosimetric evaluation of mobile communications equipment with known precision, IEEE Transaction on Communications, vol. E80-B, no. 5, May 1997, pp. 645-652. Approved by: FCC ID: ZNFH932 SAR EVALUATION REPORT Quality Manager Document S/N: Test Dates: DUT Type: Page 10 of 11 1M1710060269-01.ZNF 10/5/2017 Portable Handset © 2017 PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. REV 19.0 M 09/15/2017 © 2017 PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. All rights reserved. Unless otherwise specified, no part of this report may be reproduced or utilized in any part, form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and microfilm, without permission in writing from PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. If you have any questions about this international copyright or have an enquiry about obtaining additional rights to this report or assembly of contents thereof, please contact INFO@PCTEST.COM.

[18] CENELEC CLC/SC111B, European Prestandard (prENV 50166-2), Human Exposure to Electromagnetic Fields High- frequency: 10kHz-300GHz, Jan. 1995. [19] Prof. Dr. Niels Kuster, ETH, Eidgenössische Technische Hoschschule Zürich, Dosimetric Evaluation of the Cellular Phone. [20] IEC 62209-1, Measurement procedure for the assessment of specific absorption rate of human exposure to radio frequency fields from hand-held and body-mounted wireless communication devices - Part 1: Devices used next to the ear (Frequency range of 300 MHz to 6 GHz), July 2016. [21] Innovation, Science, Economic Development Canada RSS-102 Radio Frequency Exposure Compliance of Radiocommunication Apparatus (All Frequency Bands) Issue 5, March 2015. [22] Health Canada Safety Code 6 Limits of Human Exposure to Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields in the Frequency Range from 3 kHz – 300 GHz, 2015 [23] FCC SAR Test Procedures for 2G-3G Devices, Mobile Hotspot and UMPC Devices KDB Publications 941225, D01-D07 [24] SAR Measurement Guidance for IEEE 802.11 Transmitters, KDB Publication 248227 D01 [25] FCC SAR Considerations for Handsets with Multiple Transmitters and Antennas, KDB Publications 648474 D03-D04 [26] FCC SAR Evaluation Considerations for Laptop, Notebook, Netbook and Tablet Computers, FCC KDB Publication 616217 D04 [27] FCC SAR Measurement and Reporting Requirements for 100MHz – 6 GHz, KDB Publications 865664 D01-D02 [28] FCC General RF Exposure Guidance and SAR Procedures for Dongles, KDB Publication 447498, D01-D02 [29] Anexo à Resolução No. 533, de 10 de Septembro de 2009. [30] IEC 62209-2, Human exposure to radio frequency fields from hand-held and body-mounted wireless communication devices - Human models, instrumentation, and procedures - Part 2: Procedure to determine the specific absorption rate (SAR) for wireless communication devices used in close proximity to the human body (frequency range of 30 MHz to 6 GHz), Mar. 2010. Approved by: FCC ID: ZNFH932 SAR EVALUATION REPORT Quality Manager Document S/N: Test Dates: DUT Type: Page 11 of 11 1M1710060269-01.ZNF 10/5/2017 Portable Handset © 2017 PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. REV 19.0 M 09/15/2017 © 2017 PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. All rights reserved. Unless otherwise specified, no part of this report may be reproduced or utilized in any part, form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and microfilm, without permission in writing from PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. If you have any questions about this international copyright or have an enquiry about obtaining additional rights to this report or assembly of contents thereof, please contact INFO@PCTEST.COM.


Document Created: 2017-10-19 13:35:24
Document Modified: 2017-10-19 13:35:24
© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC