SAR Report

FCC ID: ZFT-K107

RF Exposure Info

Download: PDF
FCCID_1451761

Report No.: KS110407B02-SF FCC ID: ZFT-K107 Date of Issue: April 13, 2011 NSI/IEEE Std. C95.1-1992 In accordance with the requirements of FCC Report and Order: ET Docket 93-62, and OET Bulletin 65 Supplement C FCC SAR TEST REPORT For Product Name：Mobile Phone Brand Name：B-mobile Model Name: K107, P30D FCC ID: ZFT-K107 Report No.: KS110407B02-SF Issued for Global Mobile Communication (HK) Ltd., 7/F,Kin On Commercial Building,49-51 Jervois Street,Sheung Wan,HongKong,China Issued by Compliance Certification Services Inc. Kun shan Laboratory No.10 Weiye Rd., Innovation park, Eco&Tec, Development Zone, Kunshan City, Jiangsu, China TEL: 86-512-57355888 FAX: 86-512-57370818 Issued Date:April 13, 2011 Note: This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of Compliance Certification Services Inc. This document may be altered or revised by Compliance Certification Services Inc. personnel only, and shall be noted in the revision section of the document. The client should not use it to claim product endorsement by A2LA,NIST or any government agencies. The test results in the report only apply to the tested sample. Page 1 of 32 Rev. 00 This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of Compliance Certification Services.

Report No.: KS110407B02-SF FCC ID: ZFT-K107 Date of Issue: April 13, 2011 Revision History Rev. Issue Date Revisions Effect Page Revised By 00 April 13, 2011 Initial Issue ALL Hadiif Hoo Page 2 of 32 Rev. 00 This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of Compliance Certification Services.

Report No.: KS110407B02-SF FCC ID: ZFT-K107 Date of Issue: April 13, 2011 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE (SAR EVALUATION).....................................................................4 2. EUT DESCRIPTION ......................................................................................................................................5 3. REQ UIREMENTS FOR COMPLIANCE TESTING DEFINED BY THE FCC .....................................6 4. TEST METHODOLOGY ..............................................................................................................................6 5. Test Configuration ..........................................................................................................................................6 6. DOSIMETRIC ASSESSMENT SETUP........................................................................................................6 6.1 MEASUREMENT SYSTEM DIAGRAM ......................................................................................................................7 6.2 SYSTEM COMPONENTS ..........................................................................................................................................8 7. EVALUATION PROCEDURES .................................................................................................................10 8. MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY ..........................................................................................................13 9. EXPOSURE LIMIT ......................................................................................................................................14 10. EUT ARRANGEMENT............................................................................................................................14 10.1 ANTHROPOMORPHIC HEAD PHANTOM ..............................................................................................................14 10.2 DEFINITION OF THE “CHEEK/TOUCH” POSITION ...............................................................................................15 10.3 DEFINITION OF THE “TILTED” POSITION .............................................................................................................16 11. MEASUREMENT RESULTS..................................................................................................................17 11.1 TEST LIQUIDS CONFIRMATION ............................................................................................................................17 11.2 SYSTEM PERFORMANCE CHECK ........................................................................................................................18 11.3 EUT TUNE-UP PROCEDURES AND TEST MODE.................................................................................................20 11.4 CONDUCTED OUTPUT POWER ............................................................................................................................21 SAR MEASUREMENT RESULTS...................................................................................................................................22 EUT PHOTO .........................................................................................................................................................26 12. EQUIPMENT LIST & CALIBRATION STATUS ................................................................................30 13. FACILITIES..............................................................................................................................................31 14. REFERENCES..........................................................................................................................................31 15. ATTACHMENTS .....................................................................................................................................32 CONTENT .......................................................................................................................................................................32 Page 3 of 32 Rev. 00 This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of Compliance Certification Services.

Report No.: KS110407B02-SF FCC ID: ZFT-K107 Date of Issue: April 13, 2011 1. CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE (SAR EVALUATION) Product name: Mobile Phone Model No.: K107, P30D Trade name: B-mobile Device Category: PORTABLE DEVICES Exposure GENERAL POPULATION/UNCONTROLLED EXPOSURE Category: Date of Test: April 13, 2011 Global Mobile Communication (HK) Ltd., Applicant: 7/F,Kin On Commercial Building,49-51 Jervois Street,Sheung Wan,HongKong,China Water World Technology Co., Ltd Manufacturer: 6 Floor, Block B, Digital Building, Garden City,No.1079.Nanhai Road, NanshanDistrict, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China Application Type: Certification APPLICABLE STANDARDS AND TEST PROCEDURES STANDARDS AND TEST PROCEDURES TEST RESULT 47 CFR Part 2 ( 2.1093) Radiofrequency Radiation Exposure Evaluation: Portable Devices FCC OET Bulletin 65 (Edition 97-01), Supplement C (Edition 01-01) Evaluating Compliance with FCC Guidelines for Human Exposure to Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields IEEE 1528 - 2003 IEEE Recommended Practice for Determining the Peak Spatial-Average Specific Pass Absorption Rate (SAR) in the Human Head from Wireless Communications Devices: Measurement Technique and the following specific Test Procedures: o KDB 248227 D01 SAR measurement procedures for 802.11 a/b/g transmitters o KDB 648474 D01 SAR evaluation considerations for handsets with multiple transmitters and antennas Deviation from Applicable Standard None The device was tested by Compliance Certification Services Inc. in accordance with the measurement methods and procedures specified in OET Bulletin 65 Supplement C(Edition 01-01). The test results in this report apply only to the tested sample of the stated device/equipment. Other similar device/equipment will not necessarily produce the same results due to production tolerance and measurement uncertainties. Approved by: Reviewed by: Hadiif Hoo Sean Yu RF Manager Test Engineer Compliance Certification Service Inc. Compliance Certification Service Inc. Page 4 of 32 Rev. 00 This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of Compliance Certification Services.

Report No.: KS110407B02-SF FCC ID: ZFT-K107 Date of Issue: April 13, 2011 2. EUT DESCRIPTION Product Mobile Phone Model Number K107, P30D Trade Name B-mobile Description Only a market differentiation GSM 850: 824.2 ~ 848.8 MHz Frequency Range GSM 1900: 1850.2 ~ 1909.8 MHz Operating Mode Maximum continuous output GSM850 Band: Transmit GSM 850: 3.dBm Power(Average) GSM1900 Band: GSM 1900: . dBm GSM 850: 0.88W/kg Max. SAR GSM 1900: 0.56W/kg Network Support GSM only Modulation GSM: GMSK, Technique Li-ion Battery: Accessories 3.7V 600mAh Page 5 of 32 Rev. 00 This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of Compliance Certification Services.

Report No.: KS110407B02-SF FCC ID: ZFT-K107 Date of Issue: April 13, 2011 3. REQ UIREMENTS FOR COMPLIANCE TESTING DEFINED BY THE FCC The US Federal Communications Commission has released the report and order “Guidelines for Evaluating the Environmental Effects of RF Radiation", ET Docket No. 93-62 in August 1996. The order requires routine SAR evaluation prior to equipment authorization of portable transmitter devices, including portable telephones. For consumer products, the applicable limit is 1.6 mW/g for an uncontrolled environment and 8.0 mW/g for an occupational/controlled environment as recommended by the ANSI/IEEE standard C95.1- 1992. According to the Supplement C of OET Bulletin 65 “Evaluating Compliance with FCC Guide-lines for Human Exposure to Radio frequency Electromagnetic Fields", released on Jun 29, 2001 by the FCC, the device should be evaluated at maximum output power (radiated from the antenna) under “worst-case” conditions for normal or intended use, incorporating normal antenna operating positions, device peak performance frequencies and positions for maximum RF energy coupling. 4. TEST METHODOLOGY The Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) testing specification, method and procedure for this Mobile Phone is in accordance with the following standards: 47 CFR Part 2 ( 2.1093) IEEE C95.1-1999 IEEE 1528 – 2003 IEEE Recommended Practice for Determining the Peak Spatial-Average Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) in the Human Head from Wireless Communications Devices: Measurement Technique KDB 248227 D01 SAR measurement procedures for 802.11 a/b/g transmitters KDB 648474 D01 SAR evaluation considerations for handsets with multiple transmitters and antennas OET Bulletin 65 Supplement C (Edition 01-01) 5. TEST CONFIGURATION The device was controlled by using a base station emulator R&S CMU200. Communication between the device and the emulator was established by air link. The distance between the DUT and the antenna of the emulator is larger than 50 cm and the output power radiated from the emulator antenna is at least 30 dB smaller than the output power of DUT. The DUT was set from the emulator to radiate maximum output power during all tests. Measurements were performed on the lowest, middle, and highest channel for each testing position. For SAR testing, EUT is in GSM/GPRS link mode. In GSM link mode, its crest factor is 8, In GPRS link mode, its crest factor is 2, because EUT is set in GPRS multi-slot class 12 with 4 uplink slots. EUT is in WIFI link mode, its crest factor is 1. 6. DOSIMETRIC ASSESSMENT SETUP These measurements were performed with the automated near-field scanning system OPENSAR from ATTENNESSA. The system is based on a high precision robot (working range greater than 0.9 m), which positions the probes with a positional repeatability of better than ± 0.02 mm. Special E- and H-field probes have been developed for measurements close to material discontinuity, the sensors of which are directly loaded with a Schottky diode and connected via highly resistive lines to the data acquisition unit. The SAR measurements were conducted with the dosimetric probe EP100 1109 (manufactured by SATIMO), designed in the classical triangular configuration and optimized for dosimetric evaluation. The probe has been calibrated according to the procedure described in [7] with accuracy of better than ±10%. The spherical isotropy was evaluated with the procedure described in [8] and found to be better than ±0.25 dB. The phantom used was the SAM Twin Phantom as described in FCC supplement C, IEEE1528 and CENELEC EN50361. Page 6 of 32 Rev. 00 This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of Compliance Certification Services.

Report No.: KS110407B02-SF FCC ID: ZFT-K107 Date of Issue: April 13, 2011 The Tissue simulation liquid used for each test is in according with the FCC OET65 supplement C as listed below. Frequency Ingredients (MHz) (% by weight) 450 835 915 1900 2450 Tissue Type Head Body Head Body Head Body Head Body Head Body Water 38.56 51.16 41.45 52.4 41.05 56.0 54.9 40.4 62.7 73.2 Salt (NaCl) 3.95 1.49 1.45 1.4 1.35 0.76 0.18 0.5 0.5 0.04 Sugar 56.32 46.78 56.0 45.0 56.5 41.76 0.0 58.0 0.0 0.0 HEC 0.98 0.52 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.21 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 Bactericide 0.19 0.05 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.27 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 Triton X-100 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 36.8 0.0 DGBE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 44.92 0.0 0.0 26.7 Dielectric 43.42 58.0 42.54 56.1 42.0 56.8 39.9 54.0 39.8 52.5 Constant Conductivity 0.85 0.83 0.91 0.95 1.0 1.07 1.42 1.45 1.88 1.78 (S/m) 6.1 MEASUREMENT SYSTEM DIAGRAM The OPENSAR system for performing compliance tests consist of the following items: 1. A standard high precision 6-axis robot (KUKA) with controller and software. 2. KUKA Control Panel (KCP). 3. A dosimetric probe, i.e., an isotropic E-field probe optimized and calibrated for usage in tissue simulating liquid. The probe is equipped with an optical surface detector system. 4. The functions of the PC plug-in card are to perform the time critical task such as signal filtering, surveillance of the robot operation fast movement interrupts. 5. A computer operating Windows 95. 6. OPENSAR software. 7. Remote control with teaches pendant and additional circuitry for robot safety such as warning lamps, etc. 8. The SAM phantom enabling testing left-hand right-hand and body usage. Page 7 of 32 Rev. 00 This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of Compliance Certification Services.

Report No.: KS110407B02-SF FCC ID: ZFT-K107 Date of Issue: April 13, 2011 9. The Position device for handheld EUT. 10. Tissue simulating liquid mixed according to the given recipes (see Application Note). System validation dipoles to validate the proper functioning of the system. 6.2 SYSTEM COMPONENTS Photograph of the Probe SN11/09 EP100 Probe Specification Construction Symmetrical design with triangular core Built-in optical fiber for surface detection System Built-in shielding against static charges Calibration in air from 100 MHz to 2.5 GHz In brain and muscle simulating tissue at frequencies of 835 MHz, 897MHz ,1747 MHz,1880 MHz,1950 MHz and 1.8 GHz (accuracy of ± 8%) Frequency 100 MHz to > 30GHz; Linearity: ± 0.25 dB (100 MHz to 30 GHz) Directivity ± 0.25 dB in brain tissue (rotation around probe axis) Inside View of ± 0.5 dB in brain tissue (rotation normal probe axis) SN11/09 EP100 E-field Dynamic 0.001W/kg to > 100 W/kg; Probe Range Linearity: ± 0.25 dB Surface ± 0.2 mm repeatability in air and clear liquids Detection over diffuse reflecting surfaces Dimensions Overall length: 330 mm Tip length: 16 mm Body diameter: 8 mm Tip diameter: 6.5 mm Distance from probe tip to dipole centers: <2.7 mm Application General dosimetric up to 3 GHz Compliance tests of mobile phones Fast automatic scanning in arbitrary phantoms The SAR measurements were conducted with the dosimetric probe SN11/09 EP100designed in the classical triangular configuration and optimized for dosimetric evaluation. The probe is constructed using the thick film technique, with printed resistive lines on ceramic substrates. The probe is equipped with an optical multi-fiber line ending at the front of the probe tip. It is connected to the KRC box on the robot arm and provides an automatic detection of the phantom surface. Half of the fibers are connected to a pulsed infrared transmitter, the other half to a synchronized receiver. As the probe approaches the surface, the reflection from the surface produces a coupling from the transmitting to the receiving fibers. This reflection increases first during the approach, reaches maximum and then decreases. If the probe is flatly touching the surface, the coupling is zero. The distance of the coupling maximum to the surface is independent of the surface reflectivity and largely independent of the surface to probe angle. The OPENSAR software reads the reflection during a software approach and looks for the maximum using a 2nd order fitting. The approach is stopped when reaching the maximum. Page 8 of 32 Rev. 00 This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of Compliance Certification Services.

Report No.: KS110407B02-SF FCC ID: ZFT-K107 Date of Issue: April 13, 2011 E-Field Probe Calibration Process Each probe is calibrated according to a dosimetric assessment procedure described in [6] with accuracy better than +/- 10%. The spherical isotropy was evaluated with the procedure described in [7] and found to be better than +/-0.25dB. The sensitivity parameters (NormX, NormY, NormZ), the diode compression parameter (DCP) and the conversion factor (ConvF) of the probe are tested. The free space E-field from amplified probe outputs is determined in a test chamber. This is performed in a TEM cell for frequencies bellow 1 GHz, and in a waveguide above 1 GHz for free space. For the free space calibration, the probe is placed in the volumetric center of the cavity and at the proper orientation with the field. The probe is then rotated 360 degrees. E-field temperature correlation calibration is performed in a flat phantom filled with the appropriate simulated brain tissue. The measured free space E-field in the medium correlates to temperature rise in dielectric medium. For temperature correlation calibration a RF transparent thermistor-based temperature probe is used in conjunction with the E-field probe. SAM Phantom The SAM Phantom SAM29 is constructed of a fiberglass shell integrated in a wooden table. The shape of the shell is in compliance with the specification set in IEEE P1528 and CENELEC EN62209-1. The phantom enables the dosimetric evaluation of left and right hand phone usage as well as body mounted usage at the flat phantom region. A cover prevents the evaporation of the liquid. Reference markings on the Phantom allow the complete setup of all predefined phantom positions and measurement grids by manually teaching three points in the robot. SAM Phantom Shell Thickness: 2 ± 0.2 mm Filling Volume: Approx. 25 liters Dimensions (H x L x W): 810 x 1000 x 500 mm Device Holder for Transmitters In combination with the Generic Twin Phantom V3.0, the Mounting Device enables the rotation of the mounted transmitter in spherical coordinates whereby the rotation points is the ear opening. The devices can be easily, accurately, and repeatedly positioned according to the FCC and CENELEC specifications. The device holder can be locked at different phantom locations (left head, right head, flat phantom). Note: A simulating human hand is not used due to the complex anatomical and geometrical structure of the hand that may produced infinite number of configurations [10]. To produce the worst-case condition (the hand absorbs antenna output power), Device Holder the hand is omitted during the tests. Page 9 of 32 Rev. 00 This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of Compliance Certification Services.

Report No.: KS110407B02-SF FCC ID: ZFT-K107 Date of Issue: April 13, 2011 7. EVALUATION PROCEDURES DATA EVALUATION The OPENSAR4 post processing software automatically executes the following procedures to calculate the field units from the microvolt readings at the probe connector. The parameters used in the evaluation are stored in the configuration modules of the software: Probe parameters: - Sensitivity Normi, ai0, ai1, ai2 - Conversion factor ConvFi - Diode compression point dcpi Device parameters: - Frequency f - Crest factor cf Media parameters: - Conductivity σ - Density ρ These parameters must be set correctly in the software. They can be found in the component documents or be imported into the software from the configuration files issued for the OPENSAR components. In the direct measuring mode of the multi-meter option, the parameters of the actual system setup are used. In the scan visualization and export modes, the parameters stored in the corresponding document files are used. The first step of the evaluation is a linearization of the filtered input signal to account for the compression characteristics of the detector diode. The compensation depends on the input signal, the diode type and the DC- transmission factor from the diode to the evaluation electronics. If the exciting field is pulsed, the crest factor of the signal must be known to correctly compensate for peak power. The formula for each channel can be given as: cf V =U +U ⋅ 2 i i i dcpi with Vi = Compensated signal of channel i (i = x, y, z) Ui = Input signal of channel i (i = x, y, z) cf = Crest factor of exciting field (OPENSAR parameter) dcpi = Diode compression point (OPENSAR parameter) From the compensated input signals the primary field data for each channel can be evaluated: E-field probes: V E = i i Norm • ConvF i a +a f +a f 2 H-field probes: i10 i11 i12 H i = Vi ⋅ f with Vi = Compensated signal of channel i (i = x, y, z) Normi = Sensor sensitivity of channel i (i = x, y, z) μV/(V/m)2 for E0field Probes ConvF = Sensitivity enhancement in solution aij = Sensor sensitivity factors for H-field probes f = Carrier frequency (GHz) Ei = Electric field strength of channel i in V/m Hi = Magnetic field strength of channel i in A/m The RSS value of the field components gives the total field strength (Hermitian magnitude): = E +E +E 2 2 2 E tot x y z The primary field data are used to calculate the derived field units. Page 10 of 32 Rev. 00 This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of Compliance Certification Services.

Report No.: KS110407B02-SF FCC ID: ZFT-K107 Date of Issue: April 13, 2011 σ SAR = E ⋅ 2 tot ρ ⋅1000 with SAR = local specific absorption rate in mW/g Etot = total field strength in V/m σ = conductivity in [mho/m] or [Siemens/m] ρ = equivalent tissue density in g/cm3 Note that the density is normally set to 1 (or 1.06), to account for actual brain density rather than the density of the simulation liquid. The power flow density is calculated assuming the excitation field as a free space field. 2 E or P = H tot ⋅ 37.7 2 P pwe = tot pwe 3770 with Ppwe = Equivalent power density of a plane wave in mW/cm2 Etot = total electric field strength in V/m Htot = total magnetic field strength in A/m SAR EVALUATION PROCEDURES The procedure for assessing the peak spatial-average SAR value consists of the following steps: • Power Reference Measurement The reference and drift jobs are useful jobs for monitoring the power drift of the device under test in the batch process. Both jobs measure the field at a specified reference position, at a selectable distance from the phantom surface. The reference position can be either the selected section’s grid reference point or a user point in this section. The reference job projects the selected point onto the phantom surface, orients the probe perpendicularly to the surface, and approaches the surface using the selected detection method. • Area Scan The area scan is used as a fast scan in two dimensions to find the area of high field values, before doing a finer measurement around the hot spot. The sophisticated interpolation routines implemented in OPENSAR software can find the maximum locations even in relatively coarse grids. The scan area is defined by an editable grid. This grid is anchored at the grid reference point of the selected section in the phantom. When the area scan’s property sheet is brought-up, grid was at to 15 mm by 15 mm and can be edited by a user. • Zoom Scan Zoom scans are used to assess the peak spatial SAR values within a cubic averaging volume containing 1 g and 10 g of simulated tissue. The default zoom scan measures 5 x 5 x 7 points within a cube whose base faces are centered around the maximum found in a preceding area scan job within the same procedure. If the preceding Area Scan job indicates more then one maximum, the number of Zoom Scans has to be enlarged accordingly (The default number inserted is 1). • Power Drift measurement The drift job measures the field at the same location as the most recent reference job within the same procedure, and with the same settings. The drift measurement gives the field difference in dB from the reading conducted within the last reference measurement. Several drift measurements are possible for one reference measurement. This allows a user to monitor the power drift of the device under test within a batch process. In the properties of the Drift job, the user can specify a limit for the drift and have OPENSAR software stop the measurements if this limit is exceeded. Page 11 of 32 Rev. 00 This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of Compliance Certification Services.

Report No.: KS110407B02-SF FCC ID: ZFT-K107 Date of Issue: April 13, 2011 SPATIAL PEAK SAR EVALUATION The procedure for spatial peak SAR evaluation has been implemented according to the IEEE1529 standard. It can be conducted for 1 g and 10 g. The OPENSAR4 system allows evaluations that combine measured data and robot positions, such as: • maximum search • extrapolation • boundary correction • peak search for averaged SAR During a maximum search, global and local maximum searches are automatically performed in 2-D after each Area Scan measurement with at least 6 measurement points. It is based on the evaluation of the local SAR gradient calculated by the Quadratic Shepard’s method. The algorithm will find the global maximum and all local maxima within -2 dB of the global maxima for all SAR distributions. Extrapolation Extrapolation routines are used to obtain SAR values between the lowest measurement points and the inner phantom surface. The extrapolation distance is determined by the surface detection distance and the probe sensor offset. Several measurements at different distances are necessary for the extrapolation. Extrapolation routines require at least 10 measurement points in 3-D space. They are used in the Cube Scan to obtain SAR values between the lowest measurement points and the inner phantom surface. The routine uses the modified Quadratic Shepard’s method for extrapolation. For a grid using 5x5x7 measurement points with 5mm resolution amounting to 343 measurement points, the uncertainty of the extrapolation routines is less than 1% for 1 g and 10 g cubes. Boundary effect For measurements in the immediate vicinity of a phantom surface, the field coupling effects between the probe and the boundary influence the probe characteristics. Boundary effect errors of different dosimetric probe types have been analyzed by measurements and using a numerical probe model. As expected, both methods showed an enhanced sensitivity in the immediate vicinity of the boundary. The effect strongly depends on the probe dimensions and disappears with increasing distance from the boundary. The sensitivity can be approximately given as: Since the decay of the boundary effect dominates for small probes (a<<λ), the cos-term can be omitted. Factors Sb (parameter Alpha in the OPENSAR software) and a (parameter Delta in the OPENSAR software) are assessed during probe calibration and used for numerical compensation of the boundary effect. Several simulations and measurements have confirmed that the compensation is valid for different field and boundary configurations. This simple compensation procedure can largely reduce the probe uncertainty near boundaries. It works well as long as: • the boundary curvature is small • the probe axis is angled less than 30_ to the boundary normal • the distance between probe and boundary is larger than 25% of the probe diameter • the probe is symmetric (all sensors have the same offset from the probe tip) Since all of these requirements are fulfilled in a OPENSAR system, the correction of the probe boundary effect in the vicinity of the phantom surface is performed in a fully automated manner via the measurement data extraction during post processing. Page 12 of 32 Rev. 00 This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of Compliance Certification Services.

Report No.: KS110407B02-SF FCC ID: ZFT-K107 Date of Issue: April 13, 2011 8. MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY Tol Prob. Ci 1g Ui 10g Ui Uncertainty Component Sec. Div. Ci (1g) Vi (+- %) Dist. (10g) (+-%) (+-%) Measurement System Probe calibration E.2.1 4.7 N 1.0 1.0 1.0 4.7 4.7 Axial Isotropy E.2.2 2.5 R 1.0 1.0 Hemispherical Isotropy E.2.2 4.0 R 1.6 1.6 Boundary effect E.2.3 1.0 R 1.0 1.0 0.6 0.6 Linearity E.2.4 5.0 R 1.0 1.0 2.9 2.9 System detection limits E.2.5 1.0 R 1.0 1.0 0.6 0.6 Readout Electronics E.2.6 1.0 N 1 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Reponse Time E.2.7 0.8 R 1.0 1.0 0.5 0.5 Integration Time E.2.8 2.0 R 1.0 1.0 1.2 1.2 RF ambient Conditions-Noise E.6.1 3.0 R 1.0 1.0 1.7 1.7 RF ambient Conditions-Reflections E.6.1 3.0 R 1.0 1.0 1.7 1.7 Probe positioner Mechanical Tolerance E.6.2 2.0 R 1.0 1.0 1.2 1.2 Probe positioning with respect to Phantom E.6.3 0.4 R 1.0 1.0 0.2 0.2 Shell Extrapolation, interpolation and integration E.5 1.0 R 1.0 1.0 0.6 0.6 Algoritms for Max. SAR Evaluation Test sample Related Test Sample Positioning E.4.2 1.1 N 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.1 N-1 Device Holder Uncertainty E.4.1 5.0 N 1.0 1.0 V 5.0 5.0 N-1 Output Power Variation - SAR drift measurement 6.6.2 1.0 R 1.0 1.0 1.7 1.7 Phantom and Tissue Parameters Phantom Uncertainty (Shape and thickness E.3.1 4.0 R 1.0 1.0 2.3 2.3 tolerances) Liquid conductivity - deviation from target E.3.2 5.0 R 0.6 0.4 1.8 1.2 value Liquid conductivity - measurement uncertainty E.3.3 5.0 N 1.0 0.6 0.4 3.2 2.2 M Liquid permitivity - deviation from target value E.3.2 3.0 R 0.6 0.5 1.0 0.9 Liquid permitivity - measurement uncertainty E.3.3 2.5 N 1.0 0.6 0.5 1.5 1.2 M Combined Standard Uncertainty RSS 9.8 9.5 Expanded Uncertainty K=2 19.6 19.0 (95% Confidence interval) Page 13 of 32 Rev. 00 This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of Compliance Certification Services.

Report No.: KS110407B02-SF FCC ID: ZFT-K107 Date of Issue: April 13, 2011 9. EXPOSURE LIMIT (A). Limits for Occupational/Controlled Exposure (W/kg) Whole-Body Partial-Body Hands, Wrists, Feet and Ankles 0.4 8.0 20.0 (B). Limits for General Population/Uncontrolled Exposure (W/kg) Whole-Body Partial-Body Hands, Wrists, Feet and Ankles 0.08 1.6 4.0 Note: Whole-Body SAR is averaged over the entire body, partial-body SAR is averaged over any 1 gram of tissue defined as a tissue volume in the shape of a cube. SAR for hands, wrists, feet and ankles is averaged over any 1 grams of tissue defined as a tissue volume in the shape of a cube. Population/Uncontrolled Environments are defined as locations where there is the exposure of individuals who have no knowledge or control of their exposure. Occupational/Controlled Environments are defined as locations where there is exposure that may be incurred by people who are aware of the potential for exposure, (i.e. as a result of employment or occupation). NOTE GENERAL POPULATION/UNCONTROLLED EXPOSURE PARTIAL BODY LIMIT 1.6 W/kg 10. EUT ARRANGEMENT Please refer to IEEE P1528 illustration below. 10.1 ANTHROPOMORPHIC HEAD PHANTOM Figure 7-1a shows the front, back and side views of SAM. The point “M” is the reference point for the center of mouth, “LE” is the left ear reference point (ERP), and “RE” is the right ERP. The ERPs are 15 mm posterior to the entrance to ear canal (EEC) along the B-M line (Back-Mouth), as shown in Figure 7-1b. The plane passing through the two ear reference points and M is defined as the Reference Plane. The line N-F (Neck-Front) perpendicular to the reference plane and passing through the RE (or LE) is called the Reference Pivoting Line (see Figure 7-1c). Line B-M is perpendicular to the N-F line. Both N-F and B-M lines should be marked on the external phantom shell to facilitate handset positioning. Posterior to the N-F line, the thickness of the phantom shell with the shape of an ear is a flat surface 6 mm thick at the ERPs. Anterior to the N-F line, the ear is truncated as illustrated in Figure 7-1b. The ear truncation is introduced to avoid the handset from touching the ear lobe, which can cause unstable handset positioning at the cheek. Figure 7-1a Front, back and side view of SAM (model for the phantom shell) Page 14 of 32 Rev. 00 This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of Compliance Certification Services.

Report No.: KS110407B02-SF FCC ID: ZFT-K107 Date of Issue: April 13, 2011 Figure 7-1b Figure 7-1c Close up side view of phantom showing the ear region Side view of the phantom showing relevant markings and the 7 cross sectional plane locations Figure 7-1b Figure 7-1c Close up side view of phantom showing the ear region Side view of the phantom showing relevant markings and the 7 cross sectional plane locations 10.2 DEFINITION OF THE “CHEEK/TOUCH” POSITION The “cheek” or “touch” position is defined as follows: a. Ready the handset for talk operation, if necessary. For example, for handsets with a cover piece, open the cover. (If the handset can also be used with the cover closed both configurations must be tested.) b. Define two imaginary lines on the handset: the vertical centerline and the horizontal line. The vertical centerline passes through two points on the front side of the handset: the midpoint of the width wt of the handset at the level of the acoustic output (point A on Figures 7-2a and 7-2b), and the midpoint of the width wb of the bottom of the handset (point B). The horizontal line is perpendicular to the vertical centerline and passes through the center of the acoustic output (see Figure 7-2a). The two lines intersect at point A. Note that for many handsets, point A coincides with the center of the acoustic output. However, the acoustic output may be located elsewhere on the horizontal line. Also note that the vertical centerline is not necessarily parallel to the front face of the handset (see Figure 7-2b), especially for clamshell handsets, handsets with flip pieces, and other irregularly-shaped handsets. c. Position the handset close to the surface of the phantom such that point A is on the (virtual) extension of the line passing through points RE and LE on the phantom (see Figure 7-2c), such that the plane defined by the vertical center line and the horizontal line of the handset is approximately parallel to the sagittal plane of the phantom. d. Translate the handset towards the phantom along the line passing through RE and LE until the handset touches the pinna. Page 15 of 32 Rev. 00 This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of Compliance Certification Services.

Report No.: KS110407B02-SF FCC ID: ZFT-K107 Date of Issue: April 13, 2011 e. e) While maintaining the handset in this plane, rotate it around the LE-RE line until the vertical centerline is in the plane normal to MB-NF including the line MB (called the reference plane). f. Rotate the handset around the vertical centerline until the handset (horizontal line) is symmetrical with respect to the line NF. g. While maintaining the vertical centerline in the reference plane, keeping point A on the line passing through RE and LE and maintaining the handset contact with the pinna, rotate the handset about the line NF until any point on the handset is in contact with a phantom point below the pinna (cheek). See Figure 7-2c. The physical angles of rotation should be noted. Figure 7.2c Phone “cheek” or “touch” position. The reference points for the right ear (RE), left ear (LE) and mouth (M), which define the reference plane for handset positioning, are indicated. Figure 7.2a Figure 7.2b 10.3 DEFINITION OF THE “TILTED” POSITION The “tilted” position is defined as follows: a. Repeat steps (a) – (g) of 7.2 to place the device in the “cheek position.” b. While maintaining the orientation of the handset move the handset away from the pinna along the line passing through RE and LE in order to enable a rotation of the handset by 15 degrees. c. Rotate the handset around the horizontal line by 15 degrees. d. While maintaining the orientation of the handset, move the handset towards the phantom on a line passing through RE and LE until any part of the handset touches the ear. The tilted position is obtained when the contact is on the pinna. If the contact is at any location other than the pinna (e.g., the antenna with the back of the phantom head), the angle of the handset should be reduced. In this case, the tilted position is obtained if any part of the handset is in contact with the pinna as well as a second part of the handset is contact with the phantom (e.g., the antenna with the back of the head). Page 16 of 32 Rev. 00 This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of Compliance Certification Services.

Report No.: KS110407B02-SF FCC ID: ZFT-K107 Date of Issue: April 13, 2011 Figure 7-3 Phone “tilted” position. The reference points for the right ear (RE), left ear (LE) and mouth (M), which define the reference plane for handset positioning, are indicated. 11. MEASUREMENT RESULTS 11.1 TEST LIQUIDS CONFIRMATION SIMULATED TISSUE LIQUID PARAMETER CONFIRMATION The dielectric parameters were checked prior to assessment using the Agilent E5071B dielectric probe kit. The dielectric parameters measured are reported in each correspondent section. IEEE SCC-34/SC-2 P1528 RECOMMENDED TISSUE DIELECTRIC PARAMETERS The head tissue dielectric parameters recommended by the IEEE SCC-34/SC-2 in P1528 have been incorporated in the following table. These head parameters are derived from planar layer models simulating the highest expected SAR for the dielectric properties and tissue thickness variations in a human head. Other head and body tissue parameters that have not been specified in P1528 are derived from the tissue dielectric parameters computed from the 4-Cole-Cole equations and extrapolated according to the head parameters specified in IEEE1528 Target Frequency Head Body (MHz) εr σ (S/m) εr σ (S/m) 150 52.3 0.76 61.9 0.80 300 45.3 0.87 58.2 0.92 450 43.5 0.87 56.7 0.94 835 41.5 0.90 55.2 0.97 900 41.5 0.97 55.0 1.05 915 41.5 0.98 55.0 1.06 1450 40.5 1.20 54.0 1.30 1610 40.3 1.29 53.8 1.40 1800-2000 40.0 1.40 53.3 1.52 2450 39.2 1.80 52.7 1.95 3000 38.5 2.40 52.0 2.73 5800 45.3 5.27 48.2 6.00 (εr = relative permittivity, σ = conductivity and ρ = 1000 kg/m ) 3 Page 17 of 32 Rev. 00 This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of Compliance Certification Services.

Report No.: KS110407B02-SF FCC ID: ZFT-K107 Date of Issue: April 13, 2011 LIQUID MEASUREMENT RESULTS Ambient condition: Temperature: 21 °C Relative humidity: 58% Date: April 13,2011 Liquid Type Frequency Temp. [°C] Depth [cm] Parameters Target Measured Deviation[%] Limited[%] 20 15 Permitivity 41.50 41.42 -0.19 ±5 Head850 835 MHz 20 15 Conductivity 0.90 0.94 4.44 ±5 20 15 Permitivity 55.20 57.51 4.18 ±5 Body850 835 MHz 20 15 Conductivity 0.97 1.01 4.12 ±5 20 15 Permitivity 40.00 40.33 0.82 ±5 Head1900 1900 MHz 20 15 Conductivity 1.40 1.4 0.00 ±5 20 15 Permitivity 53.30 52.23 -2.01 ±5 Body1900 1900 MHz 20 15 Conductivity 1.52 1.48 -2.63 ±5 11.2 SYSTEM PERFORMANCE CHECK The system performance check is performed prior to any usage of the system in order to guarantee reproducible results. The system performance check verifies that the system operates within its specifications of ±10%. The system performance check results are tabulated below. And also the corresponding SAR plot is attached as well in the SAR plots files. SYSTEM PERFORMANCE CHECK MEASUREMENT CONDITIONS • The measurements were performed in the flat section of the SAM twin phantom filled with head and body simulating liquid of the following parameters. • The OPENSAR system with an E-field probe EP_100 SN:1109 was used for the measurements. • The dipole was mounted on the small tripod so that the dipole feed point was positioned below the center marking of the flat phantom section and the dipole was oriented parallel to the body axis (the long side of the phantom). The standard measuring distance was 15 mm (below 1 GHz) and 10 mm (above 1 GHz) from dipole center to the simulating liquid surface. • The coarse grid with a grid spacing of 10mm was aligned with the dipole. • Special 7x7x7 fine cube was chosen for cube integration (dx= 5 mm, dy= 5 mm, dz= 5 mm). • Distance between probe sensors and phantom surface was set to 2.5 mm. • The dipole input power was 1W±3%. • The results are normalized to 1 W input power. Reference SAR values The reference SAR values were using measurement results indicated in the dipole calibration document (see table below) Local SAR at Surface Frequency Local SAR at Surface 1g SAR 10g SAR (y = 2cm offset from feed (MHz) (Above Feed Point) point) 835 Head 9.41 6.27 14.1 4.9 835 Body 9.79 6.63 1950 Head 41.35 21.39 67.6 6.6 1950 Body 38.95 20.51 Page 18 of 32 Rev. 00 This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of Compliance Certification Services.

Report No.: KS110407B02-SF FCC ID: ZFT-K107 Date of Issue: April 13, 2011 SYSTEM PERFORMANCE CHECK RESULTS Ambient conduction Temperature: 21 °C Relative humidity: 58% System Validation Dipole: DIPOLE850 SN:SN 48/05 DIPC32 Date: April 13,2011 Medium Deviation Limit Temp Parameter Target Measured Depth (± 0.5 (%) (%) Type (°C) cm) Head 1g SAR 9.41 9.54 1.38 ± 10 835 20.00 15.00 MHz 10g SAR 6.27 6.33 1.75 ± 10 Temperature: 21 °C Relative humidity: 58% System Validation Dipole: DIPOLE850SN:SN 48/05 DIPC32 Date: April 13,2011 Medium Deviation Limit Temp Parameter Target Measured Depth (± 0.5 (%) (%) Type (°C) cm) Body 1g SAR 9.79 10.17 3.88 ± 10 835 20.00 15.00 MHz 10g SAR 6.63 6.85 3.31 ± 10 Temperature: 21 °C Relative humidity: 58% System Validation Dipole: DIPOLE1900 SN:SN 48/05 DIPG35 Date: April 13,2011 Medium Deviation Limit Temp Parameter Target Measured Depth (± 0.5 (%) (%) Type (°C) cm) Head 1g SAR 41.35 39.89 -3.53 ± 10 1900 20.00 15.00 MHz 10g SAR 21.39 21.24 -0.71 ± 10 Temperature: 21 °C Relative humidity: 58% System Validation Dipole: DIPOLE1900 SN: SN 48/05 DIPG35 Date: April 13,2011 Medium Deviation Limit Temp Parameter Target Measured Depth (± 0.5 (%) (%) Type (°C) cm) Body 1g SAR 38.95 38.56 -1.00 ± 10 1900 20.00 15.00 MHz 10g SAR 20.51 20.32 -0.93 ± 10 Page 19 of 32 Rev. 00 This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of Compliance Certification Services.

Report No.: KS110407B02-SF FCC ID: ZFT-K107 Date of Issue: April 13, 2011 11.3 EUT TUNE-UP PROCEDURES AND TEST MODE The following procedure had been used to prepare the EUT for the SAR test. a. To setup the desire channel frequency and the maximum output power. A Radio Communication Tester “CMU200 ” was used to program the EUT. GSM 850 : Main Service: Circuit Switched Power Setting: 33dBm GSM 1900: Main Service: Circuit Switched Power Setting: 30dBm b. Maximum conducted power was measured by replacing the antenna with an adapter for conductive measurement. The depth of Liquid must above 15cm. Page 20 of 32 Rev. 00 This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of Compliance Certification Services.

Report No.: KS110407B02-SF FCC ID: ZFT-K107 Date of Issue: April 13, 2011 11.4 CONDUCTED OUTPUT POWER Conducted output power (Average): Band GSM850 GSM1900 （dBm） （dBm） Channel Mode Ch 128 Ch 190 Ch 251 Ch 512 Ch 661 Ch 810 GSM 30. 31.1 31. 28. 28.0 27. Page 21 of 32 Rev. 00 This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of Compliance Certification Services.

Report No.: KS110407B02-SF FCC ID: ZFT-K107 Date of Issue: April 13, 2011 SAR MEASUREMENT RESULTS Left head / Right Head mode: Left Cheek position Right Cheek position Left Tilted position Right Tilted position Test mode: GSM 850, Duty Cycle: 12.5%, Crest Factor: 8 Depth of liquid: 15.0 cm Frequency Liquid SAR (1g) Limit EUT Position Antenna Channel MHz Temp_°C (W/kg) (W/kg) Right Cheek Fixed 128 824.2 20.0 0.85 Right Cheek Fixed 190 836.6 20.0 0.88 Right Cheek Fixed 251 848.8 20.0 0.84 Right Tilted Fixed 128 824.2 20.0 0.54 Right Tilted Fixed 190 836.6 20.0 0.51 Right Tilted Fixed 251 848.8 20.0 0.62 1.6 Left Cheek Fixed 128 824.2 20.0 0.83 Left Cheek Fixed 190 836.6 20.0 0.84 Left Cheek Fixed 251 848.8 20.0 0.81 Left Tilted Fixed 128 824.2 20.0 0.45 Left Tilted Fixed 190 836.6 20.0 0.54 Left Tilted Fixed 251 848.8 20.0 0.52 Notes: 1) Please refer to attachment for the result presentation in plot format. Page 22 of 32 Rev. 00 This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of Compliance Certification Services.

Report No.: KS110407B02-SF FCC ID: ZFT-K107 Date of Issue: April 13, 2011 Left head / Right Head mode: Left Cheek position Right Cheek position Left Tilted position Right Tilted position Test mode: GSM1900, Duty Cycle: 12.5%, Crest Factor: 8 Depth of liquid: 15.0 cm Frequency Liquid SAR (1g) Limit EUT Position Antenna Channel MHz Temp_°C (W/kg) (W/kg) Right Cheek Fixed 512 1850.2 20.0 0.44 Right Cheek Fixed 661 1880.0 20.0 0.48 Right Cheek Fixed 810 1910.0 20.0 0.56 Right Tilted Fixed 512 1850.2 20.0 0.47 Right Tilted Fixed 661 1880.0 20.0 0.46 Right Tilted Fixed 810 1910.0 20.0 0.51 1.6 Left Cheek Fixed 512 1850.2 20.0 0.38 Left Cheek Fixed 661 1880.0 20.0 0.44 Left Cheek Fixed 810 1910.0 20.0 0.42 Left Tilted Fixed 512 1850.2 20.0 0.44 Left Tilted Fixed 661 1880.0 20.0 0.43 Left Tilted Fixed 810 1910.0 20.0 0.42 Notes: 1) Please refer to attachment for the result presentation in plot format. Page 23 of 32 Rev. 00 This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of Compliance Certification Services.

Report No.: KS110407B02-SF FCC ID: ZFT-K107 Date of Issue: April 13, 2011 Body position mode： 15mm Body position face down(Bottom) Frequency Liquid SAR (1g) Limit EUT Position Antenna Channel MHz Temp_°C (W/kg) (W/kg) Test mode: GSM 850, Duty Cycle: 12.5%, Crest Factor: 8 Depth of liquid: 15.0 cm Face Down Fixed 190 836.6 20.0 0.39 1.6 Test mode: GSM 1900, Duty Cycle: 12.5%, Crest Factor: 8 Depth of liquid: 15.0 cm Face Down Fixed 661 1880.0 20.0 0.40 1.6 Notes: 1) Please refer to attachment for the result presentation in plot format. Page 24 of 32 Rev. 00 This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of Compliance Certification Services.

Report No.: KS110407B02-SF FCC ID: ZFT-K107 Date of Issue: April 13, 2011 15mm Body position face up(Top) Frequency Liquid SAR (1g) Limit EUT Position Antenna Channel MHz Temp_°C (W/kg) (W/kg) Test mode: GSM 850, Duty Cycle: 12.5%, Crest Factor: 8 Depth of liquid: 15.0 cm Face Down Fixed 190 836.6 20.0 0.28 1.6 Test mode: GSM 1900, Duty Cycle: 12.5%, Crest Factor: 8 Depth of liquid: 15.0 cm Face Down Fixed 661 1880.0 20.0 0.26 1.6 Notes: 1) Please refer to attachment for the result presentation in plot format. Page 25 of 32 Rev. 00 This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of Compliance Certification Services.

Report No.: KS110407B02-SF FCC ID: ZFT-K107 Date of Issue: April 13, 2011 EUT PHOTO Page 26 of 32 Rev. 00 This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of Compliance Certification Services.

Report No.: KS110407B02-SF FCC ID: ZFT-K107 Date of Issue: April 13, 2011 Page 27 of 32 Rev. 00 This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of Compliance Certification Services.

Report No.: KS110407B02-SF FCC ID: ZFT-K107 Date of Issue: April 13, 2011 Page 28 of 32 Rev. 00 This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of Compliance Certification Services.

Report No.: KS110407B02-SF FCC ID: ZFT-K107 Date of Issue: April 13, 2011 Page 29 of 32 Rev. 00 This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of Compliance Certification Services.

Report No.: KS110407B02-SF FCC ID: ZFT-K107 Date of Issue: April 13, 2011 12. EQUIPMENT LIST & CALIBRATION STATUS Name of Equipment Manufacturer Type/Model Serial Number Calibration Due N/A PC HP PV 3.06GHz 375052-AA1 Signal Generator Agilent E8257C MY43321570 03/24/2012 MultiMeter Keithley 2000 1015843 05/25/2011 S-Parameter Network Analyzer Agilent E5071B MY42301382 03/24/2012 Wireless Communication Test R&S CMU200 SN:B23-03291 05/25/2011 Set Power Meter Agilent E4416A QB41292714 03/24/2012 E-field PROBE ANTENNESSA EP_100 SN1109 05/04/2011 DIPOLE 835 ANTENNESSA DIPC32 SN 48/05 02/09/2012 DIPOLE 900 ANTENNESSA DIPD33 SN 48/05 02/09/2012 DIPOLE 1800 ANTENNESSA DIPF34 SN 48/05 02/09/2012 DIPOLE 1900 ANTENNESSA DIPG35 SN 48/05 02/09/2012 DIPOLE 2450 ANTENNESSA DIPJ37 SN 48/05 10/09/2011 N/A POSITIONING DEVICE ANTENNESSA MSH_14 SN 41_05 N/A DUMMY PROBE ANTENNESSA DP_12 SN 39_05 N/A SAM PHANTOM ANTENNESSA SAM29 SN 41_05 N/A N/A N/A PHANTON WOOD TABLE ANTENNESSA N/A 6 AXIS ROBOT KUKA KR3 846428 N/A ROBOT KRC KUKA KCP2 01436 N/A CHANELS SCAN CARD KEITHLEY 2000 2000-172-01B PROBE/ROBOT N/A ANTENNESSA MSH14 SN 41_05 POSITIONING DEVICE N/A LIQUID CALIBRATION KIT ANTENNESSA 41/05 OCP9 00425167 Page 30 of 32 Rev. 00 This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of Compliance Certification Services.

Report No.: KS110407B02-SF FCC ID: ZFT-K107 Date of Issue: April 13, 2011 13. FACILITIES All measurement facilities used to collect the measurement data are located at No.10, Weiye Rd., Innovation Park, Eco & Tec. Development Part, Kunshan City, Jiangsu Province, China. 14. REFERENCES [1] FCC 47 CFR Part 2 “Frequency Allocations and Radio Treaty Matters; General Rules and Regulations” [2] IEEE Std. C95.1-1999, “IEEE Standard for Safety Levels with Respect to Human Exposure to Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields, 3 kHz to 300 GHz”, 1999 [3] IEEE Std. 1528-2003, “Recommended Practice for Determining the Peak Spatial-Average Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) in the Human Head from Wireless Communications Devices: Measurement Techniques”, December 2003 [4] FCC OET Bulletin 65 (Edition 97-01) Supplement C (Edition 01-01), “Evaluating Compliance with FCC Guidelines for Human Exposure to Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields”, June 2001 [5] SATIMO ANTENNESSA System Handbook [6] FCC KDB 248227 D01 v01r02, “SAR Measurement Procedures for 802.11 a/b/g Transmitters”, May 2007 [7] FCC KDB 447498 D01 v04, “Mobile and Portable Device RF Exposure Procedures and Equipment Authorization Policies”, November 2009 [8] FCC KDB 447498 D02 v02, “SAR Measurement Procedures for USB Dongle Transmitters”, November 2009 [9] FCC KDB 616217 D01 v01r01, “SAR Evaluation Considerations for Laptop Computers with Antennas Built-in on Display Screens”, November 2009 [10] FCC KDB 616217 D03 v01, “SAR Evaluation Considerations for Laptop/Notebook/Notebook and Tablet Computers”, November 2009 [11] FCC KDB 648474 D01 v01r05, “SAR Evaluation Considerations for Handsets with Multiple Transmitters and Antennas”, September 2008 [12] FCC KDB 941225 D01 v02, “SAR Measurement Procedures for 3G Devices – CDMA 2000 / Ev-Do / WCDMA / HSDPA / HSPA”, October 2007 [13] FCC KDB 941225 D03 v01, “Recommended SAR Test Reduction Procedures for GSM / GPRS / EDGE”, December 2008 [14] FCC KDB 941225 D04 v01, “Evaluating SAR for GSM/(E)GPRS Dual Transfer Mode”, January 27 2010 Page 31 of 32 Rev. 00 This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of Compliance Certification Services.

Report No.: KS110407B02-SF FCC ID: ZFT-K107 Date of Issue: April 13, 2011 15. ATTACHMENTS Exhibit Content 1 System Validation Plots 2 SAR Test Plots 3 Dipole calibration report (850MHz/1900MHz) 4 E-field calibration report END OF REPORT Page 32 of 32 Rev. 00 This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of Compliance Certification Services.


Document Created: 2011-04-19 01:50:59
Document Modified: 2011-04-19 01:50:59
© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC