DFS Report

FCC ID: XKB-M5000CLWIBT

Test Report

Download: PDF
FCCID_3362086

CETECOM ICT Services is now TEST REPORT Test report no.: 1-2648/16-01-05 Testing laboratory Applicant CTC advanced GmbH Ingenico Group Untertuerkheimer Strasse 6 – 10 9 Avenue de la Gare Rovaltain 66117 Saarbruecken / Germany 26958 Valence Cedex 9 / FRANCE Phone: + 49 681 5 98 - 0 Contact: Jean-Baptiste Palisse Fax: + 49 681 5 98 - 9075 e-mail: jean-baptiste.palisse@ingenico.com Internet: http://www.ctcadvanced.com Phone: +33 4 75 84 21 74 e-mail: mail@ctcadvanced.com Accredited Testing Laboratory: The testing laboratory (area of testing) is accredited Manufacturer according to DIN EN ISO/IEC 17025 (2005) by the Ingenico Group Deutsche Akkreditierungsstelle GmbH (DAkkS) 9 Avenue de la Gare Rovaltain The accreditation is valid for the scope of testing 26958 Valence Cedex 9 / FRANCE procedures as stated in the accreditation certificate with the registration number: D-PL-12076-01-01 Test standard/s 47 CFR Part 15 Title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations; Chapter I; Part 15 - Radio frequency devices RSS - 247 Issue 2 Digital Transmission Systems (DTSs), Frequency Hopping Systems (FHSs) and Licence - Exempt Local Area Network (LE-LAN) Devices For further applied test standards please refer to section 3 of this test report. Test Item Kind of test item: Mobile Payment Terminal Model name: Move/5000 FCC ID: XKB-M5000CL3GWIBT IC: 2586D-M50CL3GWIBT Frequency: 5150 MHz to 5350 MHz & 5470 MHz to 5805 MHz Technology tested: WLAN Antenna: Integrated antenna Power supply: 5 V DC Temperature range: 10°C to +50°C This test report is electronically signed and valid without handwriting signature. For verification of the electronic signatures, the public keys can be requested at the testing laboratory. Test report authorized: Test performed: cn=Rene Oelmann, o=CTC Advanced David Lang GmbH, ou=OEL-161129, cn=David Lang, o=CTC advanced GmbH, email=rene.oelmann@ctcadvanced.com, ou=LNG-161129, c=DE email=david.lang@ctcadvanced.com, c=DE 2017.03.20 06:41:54 +01'00' 2017.03.17 13:33:35 +01'00' Rene Oelmann David Lang Lab Manager Lab Manager Radio Communications & EMC Radio Communications & EMC

CETECOM ICT Services is now Test report no.: 1-2648/16-01-05 1 Table of contents 1 Table of contents ............................................................................................................................................2 2 General information .......................................................................................................................................3 2.1 Notes and disclaimer .........................................................................................................................3 2.2 Application details .............................................................................................................................3 2.3 Test laboratories sub-contracted .....................................................................................................3 3 Test standard/s and references ....................................................................................................................4 4 Test environment ............................................................................................................................................5 5 Test item ..........................................................................................................................................................5 5.1 General description ...........................................................................................................................5 5.2 Additional information ......................................................................................................................5 6 Measurement uncertainty ..............................................................................................................................6 7 Summary of measurement results ...............................................................................................................7 8 Additional comments .....................................................................................................................................8 9 RF measurements ..........................................................................................................................................9 9.1 Description of test setup ...................................................................................................................9 9.1.1 Conducted measurements...................................................................................................................9 9.2 Parameters of DFS test signals ......................................................................................................10 9.2.1 DFS Detection Thresholds for Master Devices as well as Client Devices With Radar Detection .....10 9.2.2 DFS Response Requirement Values .................................................................................................10 9.2.3 Radar Test Waveforms ......................................................................................................................11 9.3 Test preparation ...............................................................................................................................14 9.3.1 Channel loading .................................................................................................................................14 9.3.2 99% Bandwidth to determine the U-NII-bandwidth............................................................................15 9.4 Test results (prior to use of a channel) .........................................................................................16 9.5 Test results (during normal operation) .........................................................................................16 9.5.1 Channel move time / channel closing transmission time ...................................................................16 9.5.2 Non-Occupancy Period ......................................................................................................................18 10 Observations ............................................................................................................................................19 Annex A Document history ............................................................................................................................19 Annex B Further information .........................................................................................................................19 Annex C Accreditation Certificate .................................................................................................................20 Page 2 of 20

CETECOM ICT Services is now Test report no.: 1-2648/16-01-05 2 General information 2.1 Notes and disclaimer The test results of this test report relate exclusively to the test item specified in this test report. CTC advanced GmbH does not assume responsibility for any conclusions and generalizations drawn from the test results with regard to other specimens or samples of the type of the equipment represented by the test item. The test report may only be reproduced or published in full. Reproduction or publication of extracts from the report requires the prior written approval of CTC advanced GmbH. The testing service provided by CTC advanced GmbH has been rendered under the current "General Terms and Conditions for CTC advanced GmbH". CTC advanced GmbH will not be liable for any loss or damage resulting from false, inaccurate, inappropriate or incomplete product information provided by the customer. Under no circumstances does the CTC advanced GmbH test report include any endorsement or warranty regarding the functionality, quality or performance of any other product or service provided. Under no circumstances does the CTC advanced GmbH test report include or imply any product or service warranties from CTC advanced GmbH, including, without limitation, any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for purpose, or non-infringement, all of which are expressly disclaimed by CTC advanced GmbH. All rights and remedies regarding vendor’s products and services for which CTC advanced GmbH has prepared this test report shall be provided by the party offering such products or services and not by CTC advanced GmbH. In no case this test report can be considered as a Letter of Approval. This test report is electronically signed and valid without handwritten signature. For verification of the electronic signatures, the public keys can be requested at the testing laboratory. 2.2 Application details Date of receipt of order: 2016-12-08 Date of receipt of test item: 2017-02-07 Start of test: 2017-03-16 End of test: 2017-03-16 Person(s) present during the test: -/- 2.3 Test laboratories sub-contracted None Page 3 of 20

CETECOM ICT Services is now Test report no.: 1-2648/16-01-05 3 Test standard/s and references Test standard Date Description 47 CFR Part 15 Title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations; Chapter I; Part 15 - Radio frequency devices RSS - 247 Issue 2 February Digital Transmission Systems (DTSs), Frequency Hopping 2017 Systems (FHSs) and Licence - Exempt Local Area Network (LE- LAN) Devices RSS - Gen Issue 4 November Spectrum Management and Telecommunications Radio Standards 2014 Specifications - General Requirements and Information for the Certification of Radio Apparatus Guidance Version Description Guidelines for Compliance Testing of Unlicensed National UNII: KDB 789033 D02 v01r03 Information Infrastructure (U-NII) Devices - Part 15, Subpart E American national standard of procedures for compliance testing ANSI C63.10-2013 -/- of unlicensed wireless devices Compliance measurement procedures for unlicensed - national information infrastructure devices operating in the 5250 - 5350 UNII: KDB 905462 D02 v02 MHz and 5470 - 5725 MHz bands incorporating dynamic frequency selection UNII: KDB 905462 D03 v01r02 Client Without DFS New Rules UNII: KDB 905462 D04 v01 Operational Modes for DFS Testing New Rules Page 4 of 20

CETECOM ICT Services is now Test report no.: 1-2648/16-01-05 4 Test environment Tnom +22 °C during room temperature tests Temperature : Tmax no extreme condition tests required Tmin no extreme condition tests required Relative humidity content : 55 % Barometric pressure : 1021 hpa Vnom 5 V DC Power supply : Vmax no extreme condition tests required Vmin no extreme condition tests required 5 Test item 5.1 General description Kind of test item : Mobile Payment Terminal Type identification : Move/5000 HMN : Move/Series PMN : -/- Move/5000 CL/3G/WiFi/BT HVIN : Move/3500 CL/3G/WiFi/BT FVIN : -/- S/N serial number : 163007333191035601212543 (Conducted Sample) HW hardware status : 01 SW software status : Not provided. Frequency band : 5150 MHz to 5350 MHz & 5470 MHz to 5805 MHz Type of radio transmission : OFDM Use of frequency spectrum : Type of modulation : BPSK, QPSK, 16 – QAM, 64 – QAM Antenna : Integrated antenna Power supply : 5 V DC Temperature range : 10°C to +50°C 5.2 Additional information The content of the following annexes is defined in the QA. It may be that not all of the listed annexes are necessary for this report, thus some values in between may be missing. Test setup- and EUT-photos are included in test report: 1-2648/16-01-01_AnnexA 1-2648/16-01-01_AnnexB Page 5 of 20

CETECOM ICT Services is now Test report no.: 1-2648/16-01-05 6 Measurement uncertainty Measurement uncertainty Test case Uncertainty Frequency accuracy (radar burst) 0.1 Hz Level accuracy (radar burst) ± 0.8 dB Page 6 of 20

CETECOM ICT Services is now Test report no.: 1-2648/16-01-05 7 Summary of measurement results ☐ No deviations from the technical specifications were ascertained ☐ There were deviations from the technical specifications ascertained This test report is only a partial test report. ☒ The content and verdict of the performed test cases are listed below. TC Identifier Description Verdict Date Remark DFS-Testing CFR Part 15, FCC 06-96 Pass 2017-03-17 DFS only Test Standard Test Case Bandwidth C NC NA NP Remark Clause 7.8.1*3 U-NII Detection Bandwidth -/- ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐ *1*2*3 §15.407 (h)(2) DFS Detection Threshold -/- ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐ *1*2*3 §15.407 (h)(2) (ii) & Channel Availability Check Time -/- ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐ *1*3 7.8.2*3 §15.407 (h)(2) (iv) & Non-Occupancy Period 40 MHz ☒ ☐ ☐ ☐ *1 7.8.3*3 §15.407 (h)(2) (iii) Channel Move Time / Channel Closing & Transmission Time 40 MHz ☒ ☐ ☐ ☐ *2 7.8.2*3 In-Service Monitoring / 7.8.3 & 7.8.4*3 Statistical Performance Check -/- ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐ *2*3 Abbreviations/References: C Compliant NC Not compliant NA Not applicable NP Not performed *1 Prior to use of a channel *2 During normal operation *3 Not applicable for Client Devices without radar detection. Page 7 of 20

CETECOM ICT Services is now Test report no.: 1-2648/16-01-05 8 Additional comments Reference documents: None Special test descriptions: All tests are conducted with Pulse Type 0. A sample with temporary antenna connector was provided to perform the measurements in a conducted way. An ASUS Access Point was used as a companion device (FCC ID: MSQ- RTAC68U) Configuration descriptions: Iperf was used to generate the required channel load (duty cycle greater 17 percent). DFS functionality: ☐ Master device ☐ Client with radar detection ☒ Client without radar detection Page 8 of 20

CETECOM ICT Services is now Test report no.: 1-2648/16-01-05 9 RF measurements 9.1 Description of test setup 9.1.1 Conducted measurements Setup Figure 1 shows a setup whereby the UUT is a RLAN device operating in slave mode, without Radar Interference Detection function. This setup also contains a RLAN device operating in master mode. The radar test signals are injected into the master device. The UUT (slave device) is associated with the master device. Figure 1 shows an example Figure 1: Setup RPP = SG - CA (RPP-radar pulse power; SG-signal generator power; CA-loss signal path) Example calculation: RPP [dBm] = -30.0 [dBm] – 33.0 [dB] = -63.0 [dBm] Equipment table: Lab / Kind of Last Next No. Equipment Type Manufacturer Serial No. INV. No. Item Calibration Calibration Calibration Vector Signal 1 A SMU200A R&S 101633 300003496 k 24.01.2017 23.01.2020 Generator Spectrum Analyzer 2 A 9kHz to 30GHz - FSP30 R&S 100886 300003575 k 24.01.2017 23.01.2019 140..+30dBm div. Splitter, Cables, 3 A DFS-test site Mini-Circuits na 300004557 ev -/- -/- Attenuators Dual Band Gigabit 4 A* RT-AC68U Asus F1IMOH056666 400001244 ne -/- -/- Router 5 A PC ExOne F+W 2890296v001 300005102 ne -/- -/- RF-Cable DFS- Batch no. 6 A Enviroflex 316 D Huber & Suhner 400001257 ev -/- -/- Tester No. 1 1560522 RF-Cable DFS- Batch no. 7 A Enviroflex 316 D Huber & Suhner 400001262 ev -/- -/- Tester No. 6 1560522 8 A Shielding Box JRE2218 JRE Test LLC 0001110 400001265 ne -/- -/- * FCC ID: MSQ-RTAC68U Agenda: Kind of Calibration k calibration / calibrated EK limited calibration ne not required (k, ev, izw, zw not required) zw cyclical maintenance (external cyclical maintenance) ev periodic self verification izw internal cyclical maintenance Ve long-term stability recognized g blocked for accredited testing vlkI! Attention: extended calibration interval NK! Attention: not calibrated *) next calibration ordered / currently in progress Page 9 of 20

CETECOM ICT Services is now Test report no.: 1-2648/16-01-05 9.2 Parameters of DFS test signals 9.2.1 DFS Detection Thresholds for Master Devices as well as Client Devices With Radar Detection Value Maximum Transmit Power EIRP (see note) ≥ 200 mW -64 dBm < 200 mW and -62 dBm power spectral density < 10 dBm/MHz < 200 mW and -64 dBm That do not meet the power spectral density < 10 dBm/MHz Note 1: This is the level at the input of the receiver assuming a 0 dBi receive antenna. Note 2: Throughout these test procedures an additional 1 dB has been added to the amplitude of the test transmission waveforms to account for variations in measurement equipment. This will ensure that the test signal is at or above the detection threshold level to trigger a DFS response. Note3: EIRP is based on the highest antenna gain. For MIMO devices refer to KDB Publication 662911 D01. 9.2.2 DFS Response Requirement Values Parameter Value Non-occupancy period minimum 30 minutes Channel Availability Check Time 60 seconds 10 seconds Channel Move Time See Note 1. 200 milliseconds + an aggregate of 60 milliseconds Channel Closing Transmission Time over remaining 10 second period. See Notes 1 and 2. Minimum 100% of the U-NII 99% transmission U-NII Detection Bandwidth power bandwidth. See Note 3. Note 1: Channel Move Time and the Channel Closing Transmission Time should be performed with Radar Type 0. The measurement timing begins at the end of the Radar Type 0 burst. Note 2: The Channel Closing Transmission Time is comprised of 200 milliseconds starting at the beginning of the Channel Move Time plus any additional intermittent control signals required to facilitate a Channel move (an aggregate of 60 milliseconds) during the remainder of the 10 second period. The aggregate duration of control signals will not count quiet periods in between transmissions. Note 3: During the U-NII Detection Bandwidth detection test, radar type 0 should be used. For each frequency step the minimum percentage of detection is 90 percent. Measurements are performed with no data traffic. Page 10 of 20

CETECOM ICT Services is now Test report no.: 1-2648/16-01-05 9.2.3 Radar Test Waveforms This section provides the parameters for required test waveforms, minimum percentage of successful detections, and the minimum number of trials that must be used for determining DFS conformance. Short Pulse Radar Test Waveforms Radar Type Pulse Width PRI (µsec) Number of Minimum Minimum (µsec) Pulses Percentage of Number of Successful Trials Detection 0 1 1428 18 See Note 1 See Note 1 1 1 Test A: 15 unique Roundup 60% 30 PRI values randomly selected from the list of 23 PRI values in Table 5a Test B: 15 unique PRI values randomly selected within the range of 518- 3066 μsec, with a minimum increment of 1 μsec, excluding PRI values selected in Test A 2 1-5 150-230 23-29 60% 30 3 6-10 200-500 16-18 60% 30 4 11-20 200-500 12-16 60% 30 Aggregate (Radar Types 1-4) 80% 120 Note 1: Short Pulse Radar Type 0 should be used for the detection bandwidth test, channel move time, and channel closing time tests. A minimum of 30 unique waveforms are required for each of the Short Pulse Radar Types 2 through 4. Page 11 of 20

CETECOM ICT Services is now Test report no.: 1-2648/16-01-05 Pulse Repetition Intervals Values for Test A Pulse Repetition Frequency Pulse Repetition Frequency Pulse Repetition Interval Number (Pulses Per Second) (Microseconds) 1 1930.5 518 2 1858.7 538 3 1792.1 558 4 1730.1 578 5 1672.2 598 6 1618.1 618 7 1567.4 638 8 1519.8 658 9 1474.9 678 10 1432.7 698 11 1392.8 718 12 1355 738 13 1319.3 758 14 1285.3 778 15 1253.1 798 16 1222.5 818 17 1193.3 838 18 1165.6 858 19 1139 878 20 1113.6 898 21 1089.3 918 22 1066.1 938 23 326.2 3066 Long Pulse Radar Test Waveform Radar Pulse Chirp Width PRI Number of Number Minimum Minimum Type Width (MHz) (µsec) Pulses per of Percentage of Number (µsec) Burst Bursts Successful of Trails Detection 5 50-100 5-20 1000- 1-3 8-20 80% 30 2000 The parameters for this waveform are randomly chosen. Thirty unique waveforms are required for the Long Pulse Radar Type waveforms. Page 12 of 20

CETECOM ICT Services is now Test report no.: 1-2648/16-01-05 Frequency Hopping Radar Test Waveform Radar Pulse Chirp Pulses Hopping Hopping Minimum Minimum Type Width Width per Hop Rate (kHz) Sequence Percentage of Number (µsec) (MHz) Length Successful of Trails (msec) Detection 6 1 333 9 0.333 300 70% 30 For the Frequency Hopping Radar Type, the same Burst parameters are used for each waveform. The hopping sequence is different for each waveform and a 100-length segment is selected from the hopping sequence defined. The first frequency in a hopping sequence is selected randomly from the group of 475 integer frequencies from 5250 – 5724 MHz. Next, the frequency that was just chosen is removed from the group and a frequency is randomly selected from the remaining 474 frequencies in the group. This process continues until all 475 frequencies are chosen for the set. Page 13 of 20

CETECOM ICT Services is now Test report no.: 1-2648/16-01-05 9.3 Test preparation 9.3.1 Channel loading Timing plots are required with calculations demonstrating a minimum channel loading of approximately 17% or greater. For example, channel loading can be estimated by setting the spectrum analyzer for zero span and approximate the Time On/ (Time On + Off Time). This can be done with any appropriate channel BW and modulation type. HT40-Mode: Calculated duty cycle = 18.2% RBW 10 MHz * VBW 10 MHz Ref -9 dBm * Att 20 dB SWT 100 ms -10 A -15 SGL 1 PK MAXH -20 -25 -30 TH -32.3 dBm -35 3DB -40 -45 -50 -55 -60 Center 5.31 GHz 10 ms/ Date: 16.MAR.2017 11:39:35 Plot 1 Page 14 of 20

CETECOM ICT Services is now Test report no.: 1-2648/16-01-05 9.3.2 99% Bandwidth to determine the U-NII-bandwidth HT40-Mode: 36.8 MHz * RBW 1 MHz Marker 1 [T1 ] * VBW 3 MHz -68.14 dBm Ref -10 dBm * Att 0 dB SWT 20 ms 5.270000000 GHz -10 OBW 36.800000000 MHz Temp 1 [T1 OBW] -35.32 dBm A -20 5.291600000 GHz 1 PK Temp 2 [T1 OBW] VIEW T2 -30 -32.79 dBm T1 5.328400000 GHz -40 -50 -60 1 3DB -70 -80 -90 -100 -110 Center 5.31 GHz 8 MHz/ Span 80 MHz Date: 16.MAR.2017 11:40:09 Plot 2 Page 15 of 20

CETECOM ICT Services is now Test report no.: 1-2648/16-01-05 9.4 Test results (prior to use of a channel) Not applicable. 9.5 Test results (during normal operation) 9.5.1 Channel move time / channel closing transmission time After a radar’s presence is detected, all transmissions shall cease on the operating channel within 10 seconds. Transmissions during this period shall consist of normal traffic for a maximum of 200 ms after detection of the radar signal. In addition, intermittent management and control signals can be sent during the remaining time to facilitate vacating the operating channel not exceeding 60ms. The test is performed during normal operation with the highest bandwidth supported by the DUT. Channel Closing Time RBW 3 MHz Marker 2 [T1 ] * VBW 3 MHz -35.07 dBm Ref -10 dBm * Att 0 dB SWT 15 s 4.113750 s -10 Marker 1 [T1 ] -30.51 dBm 0.000000 s A -20 1 PK * CLRWR TRG 1 -30 2 -40 -50 3DB -60 -70 -80 Center 5.31 GHz 1.5 s/ Date: 16.MAR.2017 11:41:33 Plot 3 Note: With Marker 1 at the end of the radar pulse (t = 0ms) the Channel Closing Time is determined by setting Marker 2 to the point where the last transmission occurred. The Channel Closing Time is 4113.75ms. Page 16 of 20

CETECOM ICT Services is now Test report no.: 1-2648/16-01-05 Channel Closing Transmission Time RBW 3 MHz Marker 1 [T1 ] * VBW 3 MHz -32.00 dBm Ref -10 dBm * Att 0 dB SWT 5 s 0.000000 s -10 Marker 2 [T1 ] -33.27 dBm 3.995625 s A -20 1 PK * CLRWR TRG -30 1 2 -40 -50 3DB -60 -70 -80 Center 5.31 GHz 500 ms/ Date: 16.MAR.2017 11:50:34 Plot 4 Note: The accumulated transmission time is calculated by the number of bins occurring after t = 200ms multiplied with the Time-per-sweep point-factor resulting from the Sweep Time and number of Sweep Points of the Spectrum Analyser. The accumulated Channel Closing Transmission Time after 200ms is 40.6ms. Page 17 of 20

CETECOM ICT Services is now Test report no.: 1-2648/16-01-05 9.5.2 Non-Occupancy Period A channel that has been flagged as containing a radar system, either by a channel availability check or in- service monitoring, is subject to a non-occupancy period of at least 30 minutes. The non-occupancy period starts at the time when the radar system is detected. RBW 3 MHz Marker 1 [T1 ] * VBW 3 MHz -30.53 dBm Ref -10 dBm * Att 0 dB SWT 1820 s 0.000000 s -10 A -20 1 PK * VIEW TRG 1 -30 -40 -50 3DB -60 -70 -80 Center 5.31 GHz 182 s/ Date: 16.MAR.2017 12:27:19 Plot 5 Page 18 of 20

CETECOM ICT Services is now Test report no.: 1-2648/16-01-05 10 Observations No observations except those reported with the single test cases have been made. Annex A Document history Version Applied changes Date of release Initial release 2017-03-17 Annex B Further information Glossary AVG - Average DUT - Device under test EMC - Electromagnetic Compatibility EN - European Standard EUT - Equipment under test ETSI - European Telecommunications Standard Institute FCC - Federal Communication Commission FCC ID - Company Identifier at FCC HW - Hardware IC - Industry Canada Inv. No. - Inventory number N/A - Not applicable PP - Positive peak QP - Quasi peak S/N - Serial number SW - Software PMN - Product marketing name HMN - Host marketing name HVIN - Hardware version identification number FVIN - Firmware version identification number OBW Occupied Bandwidth OC Operating Channel OCW Operating Channel Bandwidth OOB Out Of Band Page 19 of 20

CETECOM ICT Services is now Test report no.: 1-2648/16-01-05 Annex C Accreditation Certificate first page last page Note: The current certificate including annex can be received on request. Page 20 of 20


Document Created: 2017-03-20 06:41:54
Document Modified: 2017-03-20 06:41:54
© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC