HAC RF Report

FCC ID: V65S3150

Test Report

Download: PDF
FCCID_2143690

FCC CFR47 PART 20.19 ANSI C63.19-2011 HAC RF EMISSIONS TEST REPORT For Tri-Band 1xRTT CDMA with Bluetooth Model: S3150 FCC ID: V65S3150 Report Number: 13U16201-4A Issue Date: 11/12/2013 Prepared for Kyocera Communications 8611 Balboa Avenue, San Diego, CA 92126 Prepared by UL VERIFICATION SERVICES INC. 47173 BENICIA STREET FREMONT, CA 94538, U.S.A. TEL: (510) 771-1000 FAX: (510) 661-0888

Report No.: 13U16201-4A Issue Date: 11/12/2013 FCC ID: V65S3150 Revision History Rev. Issue Date Revisions Revised By -- 10/24/2013 Initial Issue -- A 11/12/2013 Changed ANSI C63.19-2.11 to ANSI C63.19-2011 in Section 1 Roy Chen Page 2 of 19 UL Verification Service Inc. FORM NO: CCSUP4031G 47173 BENICIA STREET, FREMONT, CA 94538, USA TEL: (510) 771-1000 FAX: (510) 661-0888 This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of UL Verification Services Inc.

Report No.: 13U16201-4A Issue Date: 11/12/2013 FCC ID: V65S3150 Table of Contents 1. Attestation of Test Results ............................................................................................................. 4 2. Test Methodology ........................................................................................................................... 5 3. Facilities and Accreditation ........................................................................................................... 5 4. Calibration and Uncertainty ........................................................................................................... 6 4.1. Measuring Instrument Calibration .............................................................................................. 6 4.2. Measurement Uncertainty .......................................................................................................... 7 5. Device Under Test........................................................................................................................... 8 5.1. Air Interfaces and Operating Mode ............................................................................................ 8 6. System Specifications .................................................................................................................... 9 7. System Validation ......................................................................................................................... 10 7.1. System Validation Results ....................................................................................................... 11 8. Modulation Interference Factor (MIF) .......................................................................................... 12 9. Average Antenna Input Power ..................................................................................................... 13 10. Evaluation for Low-power Exemption ......................................................................................... 13 11. HAC RF Emissions Test Procedure ............................................................................................. 14 12. RF Emissions Measurement Criteria ........................................................................................... 17 13. HAC (RF Emissions) Test Results ............................................................................................... 17 14. UID 10081-CAA CDMA Specification ........................................................................................... 18 Page 3 of 19 UL Verification Service Inc. FORM NO: CCSUP4031G 47173 BENICIA STREET, FREMONT, CA 94538, USA TEL: (510) 771-1000 FAX: (510) 661-0888 This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of UL Verification Services Inc.

Report No.: 13U16201-4A Issue Date: 11/12/2013 FCC ID: V65S3150 1. Attestation of Test Results Applicant name Kyocera Communications DUT description Tri-Band 1xRTT CDMA with Bluetooth Model name S3150 Test device is An identical prototype Device category Portable Exposure category General Population/Uncontrolled Exposure Test Dates N/A HAC Rating M4 Applicable Standards ANSI C63.19-2011 Test Results Pass UL Verification Services Inc. tested the above equipment in accordance with the requirements set forth in the above standards. All indications of Pass/Fail in this report are opinions expressed by UL Verification Services Inc. based on interpretations and/or observations of test results. Measurement Uncertainties were not taken into account and are published for informational purposes only. The test results show that the equipment tested is capable of demonstrating compliance with the requirements as documented in this report. Note: The results documented in this report apply only to the tested sample, under the conditions and modes of operation as described herein. This document may not be altered or revised in any way unless done so by UL Verification Services Inc. and all revisions are duly noted in the revisions section. Any alteration of this document not carried out by UL Verification Services Inc. will constitute fraud and shall nullify the document. This report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST, any agency of the Federal Government, or any agency of any government (NIST Handbook 150, Annex A). This report is written to support regulatory compliance of the applicable standards stated above. Approved & Released By: Prepared By: Bobby Bayani Roy Chen WiSE Engineer WiSE Laboratory Technician UL Verification Services Inc. UL Verification Services Inc. Page 4 of 19 UL Verification Service Inc. FORM NO: CCSUP4031G 47173 BENICIA STREET, FREMONT, CA 94538, USA TEL: (510) 771-1000 FAX: (510) 661-0888 This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of UL Verification Services Inc.

Report No.: 13U16201-4A Issue Date: 11/12/2013 FCC ID: V65S3150 2. Test Methodology The tests documented in this report were performed in accordance with ANSI C63.19-2011 Methods of Measurement of Compatibility between Wireless Communications Devices and Hearing Aids, FCC published KDB 285076 D01 HAC Guidance v03r02 and TCB workshop updates. 3. Facilities and Accreditation The test sites and measurement facilities used to collect data are located at 47173 Benicia Street, Fremont, California, USA. UL Verification Services Inc. is accredited by NVLAP, Laboratory Code 200065-0. The full scope of accreditation can be viewed at http://www.ccsemc.com. Page 5 of 19 UL Verification Service Inc. FORM NO: CCSUP4031G 47173 BENICIA STREET, FREMONT, CA 94538, USA TEL: (510) 771-1000 FAX: (510) 661-0888 This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of UL Verification Services Inc.

Report No.: 13U16201-4A Issue Date: 11/12/2013 FCC ID: V65S3150 4. Calibration and Uncertainty 4.1. Measuring Instrument Calibration The measuring equipment utilized to perform the tests documented in this report has been calibrated in accordance with the manufacturer's recommendations, and is traceable to recognized national standards. Cal. Due date Name of Equipment Manufacturer Type/Model Serial No. MM DD Year Synthesized Signal Generator HP 8665B 3546A00784 5 7 2014 Power Meter HP 437B 3125U12345 3 26 2014 Power Sensor A HP 8481A 1926A16917 8 28 2014 Power Sensor B Agilent E9323A US40411556 8 9 2014 Amplifier Sorensen XT 20-3 1318A00529 N/A Directional coupler Werlatone C8060-102 2711 N/A Robot - Six Axes Stäubli TX90 XL N/A N/A Robot Remote Control Stäubli CS8C N/A N/A DASY5 Measurement Server SPEAG SEUMS001BA 1041 N/A Probe Alignment Unit SPEAG LB (V2) 261 N/A Data Acquisition Electronics SPEAG DAE4 1258 3 6 2014 Radio Communication Tester R &S CMU 200 106301 7 3 2014 E-Field Probe SPEAG ER3DV6* 2509 5 29 2014 Calibration Dipole SPEAG CD835V3 1175 5 21 2014 Calibration Dipole SPEAG CD1880V3 1159 5 21 2014 Amplifier MITEQ 4D00400600-50-30P 1620606 N/A Directional coupler Werlatone C8060-102 2141 N/A Note(s): *: According to SPEAG’s Technical Report, “MIF Verification”, Doc # TR-FB-12.09.04-1, issued date: 9/4/2012. E-field probes are calibrated with specified uncertainty according to ISO 17025 as described in their calibration certificate. The MIF according to the definition in ANSI C63.19 is specific for a modulation and can therefore be used as a constant value if the probe has been PMR calibrated. Page 6 of 19 UL Verification Service Inc. FORM NO: CCSUP4031G 47173 BENICIA STREET, FREMONT, CA 94538, USA TEL: (510) 771-1000 FAX: (510) 661-0888 This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of UL Verification Services Inc.

Report No.: 13U16201-4A Issue Date: 11/12/2013 FCC ID: V65S3150 4.2. Measurement Uncertainty HAC Uncertainty Budget According to ANSI C63.19 Uncertainty Std. Unc.(±%) Error Description Probe Dist. Div. (Ci) E (Ci) H value (±%) E H Measurement System Probe Calibration 5.1 N 1 1 1 5.1 5.10 Axial Isotropy 4.7 R 1.732 1 1 2.7 2.71 Sensor Displacement 16.5 R 1.732 1 0.145 9.5 1.38 Boundary Effects 2.4 R 1.732 1 1 1.4 1.39 Phantom Boundary Effects 7.2 R 1.732 1 0 4.1 0.00 Linearity 4.7 R 1.732 1 1 2.7 2.71 Scaling to PMR Calibration 10.0 R 1.732 1 1 2.8 5.77 System Detection Limit 1.0 R 1.732 1 1 0.6 0.58 Readout Electronics 0.3 N 1 1 1 0.3 0.30 Response Time 0.8 R 1.732 1 1 0.5 0.46 Integration Time 2.6 R 1.732 1 1 1.5 1.50 RF Ambient Conditions 3.0 R 1.732 1 1 1.7 1.73 RF Reflections 12.0 R 1.732 1 1 6.9 6.93 Probe Positioner 1.2 R 1.732 1 0.67 0.7 0.46 Probe Positioning 4.7 R 1.732 1 0.67 2.7 1.82 Extrapolation and Interpolation 1.0 R 1.732 1 1 0.6 0.58 Test sample Related Test Positioning Vertical 4.7 R 1.732 1 0.67 2.7 1.82 Test Positioning Lateral 1.0 R 1.732 1 1 0.6 0.58 Device Holder and Phantom 2.4 R 1.732 1 1 1.4 1.39 Power Drift 5.0 R 1.732 1 1 2.9 2.89 Phantom and Setup Related Phantom Thickness 2.4 R 1.732 1 0.67 1.4 0.93 Combined Std. Uncertainty 15.4 12.2 Expanded Std. Uncertainty on Power 30.8 24.4 Expanded Std. Uncertainty on Field 15.4 12.2 Notesfor table 1. N - Nomal 2. R - Rectangular 3. Div. - Divisor used to obtain standard uncertainty 4. Ci - is te sensitivity coefficient Page 7 of 19 UL Verification Service Inc. FORM NO: CCSUP4031G 47173 BENICIA STREET, FREMONT, CA 94538, USA TEL: (510) 771-1000 FAX: (510) 661-0888 This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of UL Verification Services Inc.

Report No.: 13U16201-4A Issue Date: 11/12/2013 FCC ID: V65S3150 5. Device Under Test Tri-Band 1xRTT CDMA with Bluetooth 5.1. Air Interfaces and Operating Mode Voice over Additional Concurrent digital WiFi Air- Bands Type HAC Simultaneous but not GSM HAC Tested or not Transport Low Interface (MHz) Transport Tested Tested Power Tested OTT Power Reduction Capability BC0 CDMA VD Yes Yes – BT Not tested1 NA NA NA (850) BC1 CDMA VD Yes Yes – BT Not tested1 NA NA NA (1900) BC10 CDMA VD Yes Yes – BT Not tested1 NA NA NA (850) Type Transport Note: VO = Voice only 1. No concurrent mode was found to be the Worst Case mode DT = Digital Transport VD = CMRS and Data transport (HAC Tested) Note(s): 1. All interfaces with “Yes” indication under the “HAC Tested” column were further evaluated for exemption from HAC testing on the basis of antenna input power under Section 10. Page 8 of 19 UL Verification Service Inc. FORM NO: CCSUP4031G 47173 BENICIA STREET, FREMONT, CA 94538, USA TEL: (510) 771-1000 FAX: (510) 661-0888 This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of UL Verification Services Inc.

Report No.: 13U16201-4A Issue Date: 11/12/2013 FCC ID: V65S3150 6. System Specifications E-field measurements are performed using the DASY5 automated dosimetric assessment system. The DASY5 is made by Schmid & Partner Engineering AG (SPEAG) in Zurich, Switzerland. The DASY5 HAC Extension consists of the following parts: Test Arch Phantom The specially designed Test Arch allows high precision positioning of both the device and any of the validation dipoles. ER3DV6 Isotropic E-Field Probe Construction: One dipole parallel, two dipoles normal to probe axis Built-in shielding against static charges PEEK enclosure material (resistant to organic solvents, e.g., glycolether) Calibration: In air from 100 MHz to 3.0 GHz (absolute accuracy ±6.0%, k=2) Frequency: 100 MHz to > 6 GHz; Linearity: ± 0.2 dB (100 MHz to 3 GHz) Directivity: ± 0.2 dB in air (rotation around probe axis) ± 0.4 dB in air (rotation normal to probe axis) Dynamic Range: 2 V/m to > 1000 V/m; Linearity: ± 0.2 dB Dimensions: Overall length: 330 mm (Tip: 16 mm) Tip diameter: 8 mm (Body: 12 mm) Distance from probe tip to dipole centers: 2.5 mm The closest part of the sensor element is 1.1 mm closer to the tip Application: General near-field measurements up to 6 GHz Field component measurements Page 9 of 19 UL Verification Service Inc. FORM NO: CCSUP4031G 47173 BENICIA STREET, FREMONT, CA 94538, USA TEL: (510) 771-1000 FAX: (510) 661-0888 This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of UL Verification Services Inc.

Report No.: 13U16201-4A Issue Date: 11/12/2013 FCC ID: V65S3150 7. System Validation The test setup was validated when first configured and verified periodically thereafter to ensure proper function. The procedure provided in this section is a validation procedure using dipole antennas for which the field levels were computed by numeric modeling. Procedure Place a dipole antenna meeting the requirements given in ANSI C63.19-2011 in the normally occupied by the WD. The dipole antenna serves as a known source for an electrical and magnetic output. Position the E-field probe so that the following occurs: ‧ The probes and their cables are parallel to the coaxial feed of the dipole antenna ‧ The probe cables and the coaxial feed of the dipole antenna approach the measurement area from opposite directions ‧ The center point of the probe element(s) is 15 mm from the closest surface of the dipole elements. Scan the length of the dipole with the E-field probe and record the two maximum values found near the dipole ends. Average the two readings and compare the reading to the expected value in the calibration certificate or the expected value in this standard. Setup diagram Page 10 of 19 UL Verification Service Inc. FORM NO: CCSUP4031G 47173 BENICIA STREET, FREMONT, CA 94538, USA TEL: (510) 771-1000 FAX: (510) 661-0888 This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of UL Verification Services Inc.

Report No.: 13U16201-4A Issue Date: 11/12/2013 FCC ID: V65S3150 7.1. System Validation Results Not applicable Page 11 of 19 UL Verification Service Inc. FORM NO: CCSUP4031G 47173 BENICIA STREET, FREMONT, CA 94538, USA TEL: (510) 771-1000 FAX: (510) 661-0888 This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of UL Verification Services Inc.

Report No.: 13U16201-4A Issue Date: 11/12/2013 FCC ID: V65S3150 8. Modulation Interference Factor (MIF) The HAC Standard ANSI C63.19-2011 defines a new scaling using the Modulation Interference Factor (MIF) which replaces the need for the Articulation Weighting Factor (AWF) during the evaluation and is applicable to any modulation scheme. The Modulation Interference factor (MIF, in dB) is added to the measured average E-field (in dBV/m) and converts it to the RF Audio Interference level (in dBV/m). This level considers the audible amplitude modulation components in the RF E-field. CW fields without amplitude modulation are assumed to not interfere with the hearing aid electronics. Modulations without time slots and low fluctuations at low frequencies have low MIF values, TDMA modulations with narrow transmission and repetition rates of few 100 Hz have high MIF values and give similar classifications as ANSI C63-2007. Definitions ER3D, E-field probes have a bandwidth <10 kHz and can therefore not evaluate the RF envelope in the full audio band. DASY52 is therefore using the “indirect" measurement method according to ANSI C63.19-2011 which is the primary method. These near field probes read the averaged E-field measurement. Especially for the new high peak-to-average (PAR) signal types, the probes shall be linearized by probe modulation response (PMR) calibration in order to not overestimate the field reading. The evaluation method or the MIF is defined in ANSI C63.19-2011 section D.7. An RMS demodulated RF signal is fed to a spectral filter (similar to an A weighting filter) and forwarded to a temporal filter acting as a quasi-peak detector. The averaged output of these filtering is called to a 1 kHz 80% AM signal as reference. MIF measurement requires additional instrumentation and is not well suited for evaluation by the end user with reasonable uncertainty. It may alternatively be determined through analysis and simulation, because it is constraint and characteristic for a communication signal. DASY52 uses well defined signals for PMR calibration. The MIF of these signals has been determined by simulation and is automatically applied. MIF values were not tested by a probe or as specified in the standards but are based on analysis provided by SPEAG for the following User Identifiers and air interfaces. UID Communication System Name MIF (dB) 10081-CAA CDMA2000 (1xRTT, RC3) -19.71 A PMR calibrated probe is linearized for the selected waveform over the full dynamic range within the uncertainty specified in its calibration certificate. ER3D, EF3D and EU2D E-field probes have a bandwidth <10 kHz and can therefore not evaluate the RF envelope in the full audio band. DASY52 is therefore using the \indirect" measurement method according to ANSI C63.19-2011 which is the primary method. These near field probes read the averaged E-field measurement. Especially for the new high peak-to-average (PAR) signal types, the probes shall be linearized by PMR calibration in order to not overestimate the field reading. The MIF measurement uncertainty is estimated as follows, for modulation frequencies from slotted waveforms with fundamental frequency and at least 2 harmonics within 10 kHz:  0.2 dB for MIF -7 to +5 dB,  0.5 dB for MIF -13 to +11 dB  1 dB for MIF > -20 dB Page 12 of 19 UL Verification Service Inc. FORM NO: CCSUP4031G 47173 BENICIA STREET, FREMONT, CA 94538, USA TEL: (510) 771-1000 FAX: (510) 661-0888 This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of UL Verification Services Inc.

Report No.: 13U16201-4A Issue Date: 11/12/2013 FCC ID: V65S3150 9. Average Antenna Input Power Average Power (dBm) Air-Interface Target Max. Tune-up Limit CDMA BC0 24.8 25.5 CDMA BC1 24.5 25.2 CDMA BC10 24.5 25.2 10. Evaluation for Low-power Exemption An RF air interface technology of a device is exempt from testing when its average antenna input power plus its MIF is ≤17 dBm for any of its operating modes. If a device supports multiple RF air interfaces, each RF air interface shall be evaluated individually. Average Antenna Input Power Air-Interface MIF (dB) HAC Tested Input Power (dBm)1 plus its MIF (dBm) CDMA BC0 25.5 -19.71 5.79 No CDMA BC1 25.2 -19.71 5.49 No CDMA BC10 25.2 -19.71 5.49 No Note(s): 1. Max tune-up limit Conclusions RF Emission testing for this device is exempt. Page 13 of 19 UL Verification Service Inc. FORM NO: CCSUP4031G 47173 BENICIA STREET, FREMONT, CA 94538, USA TEL: (510) 771-1000 FAX: (510) 661-0888 This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of UL Verification Services Inc.

Report No.: 13U16201-4A Issue Date: 11/12/2013 FCC ID: V65S3150 11. HAC RF Emissions Test Procedure The following are step-by-step test procedures. a) Confirm proper operation of the field probe, probe measurement system and other instrumentation and the positioning system. b) Position the WD in its intended test position. c) Set the WD to transmit a fixed and repeatable combination of signal power and modulation characteristic that is representative of the worst case (highest interference potential) encountered in normal use. Transiently occurring start-up, changeover, or termination conditions, or other operations likely to occur less than 1% of the time during normal operation, may be excluded from consideration. d) The center sub-grid shall be centered on the T-Coil mode perpendicular measurement point or the acoustic output, as appropriate. Locate the field probe at the initial test position in the 50 mm by 50 mm grid, which is contained in the measurement plane, refer to illustrated in Figure 1. If the field alignment method is used, align the probe for maximum field reception. e) Record the reading at the output of the measurement system f) Scan the entire 50 mm by 50 mm region in equally spaced increments and record the reading at each measurement point. The distance between measurement points shall be sufficient to assure the identification of the maximum reading. g) Identify the five contiguous sub-grids around the center sub-grid whose maximum reading is the lowest of all available choices. This eliminates the three sub-grids with the maximum readings. Thus, the six areas to be used to determine the WD’s highest emissions are identified. h) Identify the maximum reading within the non-excluded sub-grids identified in step g). i) Convert the highest field reading within identified in step h) to RF audio interference level, in V/m, by taking the square root of the reading and then dividing it by the measurement system transfer function, established in 5.5.1.1 Convert this result to dB(V/m) by taking the base-10 logarithm and multiplying by 20. Indirect measurement method Replacing step i), the RF audio interference level in dB (V/m) is obtained by adding the MIF (in dB) to the maximum steady-state rms field-strength reading, in dB(V/m), from step h). Use this result to determine the category rating j) Compare this RF audio interference level with the categories in Clause 8 (ANSI C63.19-2011) and record the resulting WD category rating k) For the T-Coil mode M-rating assessment, determine whether the chosen perpendicular measurement point is contained in an included sub-grid of the first scan. If so, then a second scan is not necessary. The first scan and resultant category rating may be used for the T-Coil mode M rating. Otherwise, repeat step a) through step i), with the grid shifted so that it is centered on the perpendicular measurement point. Record the WD category rating. Page 14 of 19 UL Verification Service Inc. FORM NO: CCSUP4031G 47173 BENICIA STREET, FREMONT, CA 94538, USA TEL: (510) 771-1000 FAX: (510) 661-0888 This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of UL Verification Services Inc.

Report No.: 13U16201-4A Issue Date: 11/12/2013 FCC ID: V65S3150 Figure 1 - WD reference and plane for RF emission measurements Page 15 of 19 UL Verification Service Inc. FORM NO: CCSUP4031G 47173 BENICIA STREET, FREMONT, CA 94538, USA TEL: (510) 771-1000 FAX: (510) 661-0888 This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of UL Verification Services Inc.

Report No.: 13U16201-4A Issue Date: 11/12/2013 FCC ID: V65S3150 Test flowchart Per ANSI-PC63.19 2011 Test Instructions • Confirm proper operation of probes and instrumentation • Position WD • Configure WD Tx Operation (Step a-c) • Initialize field probe and take first reading • Scan Area (Step d-f) • Identify exclusion area • Rescan or reanalyze open area todetermine maximum • Indirect method: Add the MIF to the maximum steady state rms field strength and record RF Audio Interference Level, in dB (V/m) (Step g-i) Identify & Record Category (Step j) Page 16 of 19 UL Verification Service Inc. FORM NO: CCSUP4031G 47173 BENICIA STREET, FREMONT, CA 94538, USA TEL: (510) 771-1000 FAX: (510) 661-0888 This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of UL Verification Services Inc.

Report No.: 13U16201-4A Issue Date: 11/12/2013 FCC ID: V65S3150 12. RF Emissions Measurement Criteria WD RF audio interference level caterories in logarithmic units E-field emissions Emission Categories < 960 MHz > 960 MHz Category M1 50 to 55 dB (V/m) 40 to 45 dB (V/m) Category M2 45 to 50 dB (V/m) 35 to 40 dB (V/m) Category M3 40 to 45 dB (V/m) 30 to 35 dB (V/m) Category M4 <40 dB (V/m) <30 dB (V/m) 13. HAC (RF Emissions) Test Results Not applicable. Page 17 of 19 UL Verification Service Inc. FORM NO: CCSUP4031G 47173 BENICIA STREET, FREMONT, CA 94538, USA TEL: (510) 771-1000 FAX: (510) 661-0888 This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of UL Verification Services Inc.

Calibration Laboratory of Schmid & Partner Engineering AG Zoughausstrasse 43, 8004 Zurich, Switzerland Name: comaz000 (xatt, rc3) Group: comaz000 uip: 10081—cA pan: a07 as mie:2 —19.71 a8 Standard Reference: SGPP2 ©.50002:G—1, Chapter 2.1.3.92.9 ECC OET KDB941225 DO1 SAR test for 3G devices (v02) Category: Random ampiiude modulation Modulation: srsk Frequency Band: Band Class 0 (824.0—840.0 MHz, 20039) Band Class 1 (1850.0—1910.0 MHz, 20040) Band Class 2 (872.0—915.0 MHz, 20041) Band Class 3 (887.0—025.0 MHz, 20042) Band Class 4 (1750.0—1780.0 MHz, 20043) Band Class 5 (411.7—483.5 MHz, 20044) Band Class 6 (1920.0—1080.0 MHz, 20045) Band Class 7 (776.0—794.0 MHz, 20048) Band Class 8 (1710.0—1785.0 MHz, 20047) Band Class 9 (£80.0—915.0 MHz, 20048) Band Class 10 (208.0—001.0 MHz, 20049) Band Class 11 (410.0—462.5 MHz, 20050) Band Class 12 (870.0—876.0 MHz, 20051) Detailed Specification: Radio Conigurations 3 (RC3) Output Slot: PICH, FCH 9.6 kpbs R—PITGH: Walsh Gode 0, Code Power: 5.278 dB, Data Rate: NA, Data: All"0" R—FCH: Walsh Code 4, Code Power —1.528 dB, Data Rate 9.6kpbs, Data: PN9Nx Bandwicth: 12 Mz Integration Time: 80.0 ms T~ FAR (0150 in accordance win FGG Kb a71162,Seeton .0 "Moaswrement of the Peato—Average Pover Rato (PAPRY® 2 Modlatin Interlrence Factor (VIF) valuevald onl in coninction wih advanced probe response Incarizaton calbraton or the san communieaton systam (same UID and version}. UID Specification Shoot UID 10081—CAA page 1/2 20.02.2013 Hee reprvn oner rivcue reprvravex envign m ram envivue ons es eppnuvee ur ow exrmusiiit oi ud i

Report No.: 13U16201-4A Issue Date: 11/12/2013 FCC ID: V65S3150 END OF REPORT Page 19 of 19 UL Verification Service Inc. FORM NO: CCSUP4031G 47173 BENICIA STREET, FREMONT, CA 94538, USA TEL: (510) 771-1000 FAX: (510) 661-0888 This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of UL Verification Services Inc.


Document Created: 2013-11-12 14:54:38
Document Modified: 2013-11-12 14:54:38
© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC