C2PC SAR report

FCC ID: V65C5155

RF Exposure Info

Download: PDF
FCCID_1783395

Applicant: Kyocera FCC ID: V65C5155 Report #: CT-C5156-9-0712-R1 Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) FCC 47 CFR Part 2 Test Report For Kyocera Corporation c/o Kyocera Communication, Inc. Product: Dual-Band CDMA Mobile Phone Model: C5156 © 2012 Comptest Services LLC Page 1 of 33 SAR Report This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written consent of CompTest Services LLC.

Applicant: Kyocera FCC ID: V65C5155 Report #: CT-C5156-9-0712-R1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 SUMMARY OF TESTING ................................................................................................................. 4 2 EQUIPMENT UNDER TEST INFORMATION ................................................................................... 5 3 ACCESSORIES ................................................................................................................................ 5 3.1 BODY W ORN ACCESSORIES ........................................................................................................ 5 3.2 BATTERIES ................................................................................................................................. 5 4 TEST CONDITIONS ......................................................................................................................... 6 4.1 TEST FACILITIES ......................................................................................................................... 6 4.2 AMBIENT CONDITIONS ................................................................................................................. 6 4.3 RF CHARACTERISTICS OF THE TEST SITE ...................................................................................... 6 4.4 TEST SIGNAL, FREQUENCIES AND OUTPUT POWER ....................................................................... 7 4.5 DEVICE TEST CONDITIONS........................................................................................................... 9 4.6 MULTIPLE TRANSMITTERS AND ANTENNAS SAR EVALUATIONS..................................................... 10 4.7 ROUTER SAR EVALUATIONS...................................................................................................... 12 4.8 HAND SAR EVALUATIONS.......................................................................................................... 12 4.9 SAR TESTS IN MOUTH AND JAW REGIONS OF THE SAM PHANTOM .............................................. 13 5 DESCRIPTION OF THE TEST EQUIPMENT ................................................................................. 14 5.1 DOSIMETRIC SYSTEM ................................................................................................................ 14 5.2 ADDITIONAL EQUIPMENT NEEDED IN VALIDATION.......................................................................... 16 5.3 TISSUE STIMULANTS ................................................................................................................. 16 5.4 PHANTOMS DESCRIPTION .......................................................................................................... 17 5.5 ISOTROPIC E-FIELD PROBE ....................................................................................................... 18 6 SYSTEM VALIDATION .................................................................................................................. 19 7 DESCRIPTION OF THE TEST PROCEDURE ................................................................................ 21 7.1 TEST POSITIONS ....................................................................................................................... 21 7.2 SCAN PROCEDURES .................................................................................................................. 23 7.3 SAR AVERAGING METHODS ...................................................................................................... 23 8 MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY.................................................................................................. 24 9 TEST DATA.................................................................................................................................... 25 9.1 HEAD SAR TEST RESULTS ........................................................................................................ 25 9.2 BODY-W ORN SAR TEST RESULTS ............................................................................................. 28 10 SIMULTANEOUS SAR EVALUATION ........................................................................................... 31 10.1 SUMMATION OF HIGHEST MEASURED SAR VALUES .................................................................... 31 10.2 SUMMATION OF HIGHEST SCALED SAR VALUES ......................................................................... 32 11 LIST OF APPENDIX ....................................................................................................................... 33 © 2012 Comptest Services LLC Page 2 of 33 SAR Report This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written consent of CompTest Services LLC.

Applicant: Kyocera FCC ID: V65C5155 Report #: CT-C5156-9-0712-R1 ATTESTATION The tested device complies with the requirements in respect of all parameters subject to the test. The test results and statements relate only to the items tested. The test equipment used was suitable for the tests performed and within manufacturer’s published specifications and operating parameters. The test methods were consistent with the methods described in the relevant standards. Product: Dual-Band CDMA Mobile Phone with Bluetooth and WLAN Model #: C5156 FCC ID: V65C5155 Tested in accordance with: FCC §2.1093/OET-65 Supplement C IEEE P2528/D1.2 – 2003 FCC KDB 248227 D01 v01r02 FCC KDB 648474 D01 v01r05 FCC KDB 941225 v2 Test Requested by: KYOCERA Corporation C/o KYOCERA Communication Inc. 8611 Balboa Avenue San Diego, CA 92123 United States Test performed by: CompTest Services LLC Date of Test: July 11 – August 7, 2012 Responsible Engineer Reviewed and approved by: Benjamin Nguyen Benjamin Nguyen Tammy To Test Engineer Quality Manager © 2012 Comptest Services LLC Page 3 of 33 SAR Report This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written consent of CompTest Services LLC.

Applicant: Kyocera FCC ID: V65C5155 Report #: CT-C5156-9-0712-R1 1 SUMMARY OF TESTING The equipment is deemed to fulfill the requirements if the measured values are less than or equal to the limit. Measured Standalone FCC Limit Mode-Band Position Result SAR (W/kg) (W/kg, 1g) CDMA-800 Head 0.98 PASSED Body – 15 mm 0.70 PASSED CDMA-1900 Head 1.36 1.6 PASSED Body – 15 mm 0.75 PASSED Head 0.13 PASSED WLAN-2450 Body – 15 mm 0.09 PASSED © 2012 Comptest Services LLC Page 4 of 33 SAR Report This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written consent of CompTest Services LLC.

Applicant: Kyocera FCC ID: V65C5155 Report #: CT-C5156-9-0712-R1 2 EQUIPMENT UNDER TEST INFORMATION Product: Dual-Band CDMA Mobile Phone with Bluetooth and WLAN FCC ID: V65C5155 Model Number: C5156 EUT Serial Number: 268435457816727796 Type: [ ] Identical Prototype, [X] Pre-Production, [ ] Production Device Category: Portable RF Exposure Environment: General Population / Uncontrolled CDMA Antenna: Internal Detachable: No WiFi/Bluetooth Antenna: Internal Detachable: No External Input: Audio/Digital Data Quantity: Quantity production is planned CDMA CDMA Mode: 1X & EvDo 1x & EvDo 802.11 Bluetooth Rev0, A Rev0, A b/g/n Band: BC-0 BC-1 -- -- TX Frequency (MHz): 824.7 -848.3 1850 -1910 2412 -2462 2400 -2483.5 3 ACCESSORIES 3.1 Body Worn Accessories The device has been tested with the following body worn accessories that contains metal parts and separation distance between the device and the user’s body is listed in the table below. Accessory Model Separation (mm) Air N/A 15.0 3.2 Batteries The device was tested with the following battery packs: Battery Model Specifications Standard SCP-46LBPS 3.7V, 1500mAh © 2012 Comptest Services LLC Page 5 of 33 SAR Report This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written consent of CompTest Services LLC.

Applicant: Kyocera FCC ID: V65C5155 Report #: CT-C5156-9-0712-R1 4 TEST CONDITIONS 4.1 Test Facilities The test sites and measurement facilities used to collect data are located at 8611 Balboa Avenue, San Diego, CA 92123, USA 4.2 Ambient Conditions All tests were performed under the following environmental conditions: Ambient Temperature: 22  1 Degrees C Tissue simulating liquid temperature: 22  1 Degrees C Humidity: 38 % Pressure: 1015 mB 4.3 RF characteristics of the test site All SAR measurements were performed inside a shielded room that provides isolation from external EM fields. External fields are minimizing by the shielded room, leaving the phone as the dominant radiation source. Two 2-foot square ferrite panels are placed on the floor of the room beneath the phantom area of the DASY system to minimize reflected energy that would otherwise re-enter the phantom and combine constructively or destructively with the desired fields. These ferrite panels provide roughly 12 to 13 dB of attenuation in the frequency range of 900 MHz, and 7 to 8 dB of attenuation in the frequency range of 1.9 GHz. © 2012 Comptest Services LLC Page 6 of 33 SAR Report This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written consent of CompTest Services LLC.

Applicant: Kyocera FCC ID: V65C5155 Report #: CT-C5156-9-0712-R1 4.4 Test Signal, Frequencies and Output Power In all operating bands, the measurements were performed on low, mid and high channels. The phone was set to nominal maximum power level during all tests and at the beginning of each test. DASY4 system measures power drift during SAR testing by comparing E-field in the same location at the beginning and at the end of measurement. These records were used to monitor stability of power output. 4.4.1 CDMA2000/EVDO Test conditions The device supports CDMA2000 in 1X (Phase I, Protocol revision 6) and 1x EvDo Rev 0, A modes. CDMA2000 1X includes TIA/EIA-95B as a subset and was approved for publishing in July 1999. It provides voice and data capabilities within a standard 1.25 MHz CDMA channel. This RF bandwidth is identical to the legacy IS-95 B system standard. 4.4.1.1 SAR Test Reduction When maximum output variation across channels of each band/mode is < ½ dB, either maximum output or middle channels may be used to determine test reduction for each mode in a cellphone; otherwise, the maximum output channel was used to determine test reduction for each band/mode. If the SAR measured at the reduction tested channel is at least 3dB lower than the SAR limit, testing at other channels were optional. 4.4.1.2 Head SAR Measurements SAR for head exposure configurations was measured in RC3 with the EUT configured to transmit at full rate using Loopback Service Option SO55. SAR for RC1 was not required when the maximum average output of each channel was less than ¼ dB higher than that measured in RC3. Otherwise, SAR was measured on the maximum output channel in RC1 using the exposure configuration that results in the highest SAR for that channel in RC3. © 2012 Comptest Services LLC Page 7 of 33 SAR Report This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written consent of CompTest Services LLC.

Applicant: Kyocera FCC ID: V65C5155 Report #: CT-C5156-9-0712-R1 4.4.1.3 Body SAR Measurements SAR for body exposure configurations was measured in RC3 with the DUT configured to transmit at full rate on FCH with all other code channels disabled using TDSO / SO32. SAR for multiple code channels (FCH + SCHn) was not required when the maximum average output of each RF channel was less than ¼ dB higher than that measured with FCH only. Otherwise, SAR was measured on the maximum output channel (FCH + SCHn) with FCH at full rate and SCH0 enabled at 9600 bps using the exposure configuration that results in the highest SAR for that channel with FCH only. When multiple code channels were enabled, the DUT output may shift by more than 0.5 dB and lead to higher SAR drifts and SCH dropouts. Body SAR in RC1 was not required when the maximum average output of each channel was less than ¼ dB higher than that measured in RC3. Otherwise, SAR was measured on the maximum output channel in RC1; with Loopback Service Option SO55, at full rate, using the body exposure configuration that resulted in the highest SAR for that channel in RC3. 4.4.1.4 Devices with Ev-Do For devices with Ev-Do capabilities, when the maximum average output of each channel in Rev. 0 was less than ¼ dB higher than that measured in RC3 (1x RTT), body SAR for Ev-Do was not required. Otherwise, SAR for Rev. 0 was measured on the maximum output channel at 153.6 kbps using the body exposure configuration that resulted in the highest SAR for that channel in RC3. SAR for Rev. A was not required when the maximum average output of each channel was less than that measured in Rev. 0 or less than ¼ dB higher than that measured in RC3. Otherwise, SAR was measured on the maximum output channel for Rev. A using a Reverse Data Channel payload size of 4096 bits and a Termination Target of 16 slots defined for Subtype 2 Physical Layer configurations. A Forward Traffic Channel data rate corresponding to the 2-slot version of 307.2 kbps with the ACK Channel transmitting in all slots should be configured in the downlink for both Rev. 0 and Rev. A 4.4.1.5 Power Reduction (PR) The device does: not implement power reduction. implement power reduction only at the following conditions: Configuration: Band: Mode: Power Reduction: © 2012 Comptest Services LLC Page 8 of 33 SAR Report This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written consent of CompTest Services LLC.

Applicant: Kyocera FCC ID: V65C5155 Report #: CT-C5156-9-0712-R1 4.4.1.6 RF Conducted Power Data Table 4.4 below shows the maximum power level vs RCs: CONFIGURATION CONDUCTED POWER (dBm) (Full Rate) CDMA 800 BC-0 CDMA 1900 BC-1 Ch Ch Ch Ch Ch Ch 1013 384 777 25 600 1175 RC1 24.70 24.70 24.60 24.54 24.62 24.65 SO2 RC3 24.65 24.73 24.60 24.55 24.56 24.66 RC1 24.60 24.68 24.58 24.61 24.70 24.50 SO55 RC3 24.63 24.73 24.61 24.62 24.72 24.62 RC3 24.60 24.71 24.61 24.58 24.69 24.60 TDSO (SCH) SO32 RC3 24.69 24.68 24.59 24.59 24.69 24.59 (+FCH-SCH) RTAP 24.72 24.70 24.68 24.61 24.70 24.68 EvDo Rev 0 FTAP 24.63 24.70 24.67 24.68 24.70 24.76 RTAP 24.72 24.74 24.72 24.66 24.79 24.78 EvDo Rev A FTAP 24.69 24.73 24.70 24.67 24.76 24.77 Maximum output variation < ½ dB < ½ dB across channels: Table 4.4 RC Configuration tested at “all up” power control bit. 4.5 Device Test Conditions The EUT was tested with a fully charged battery as supplied with the handset. Conducted RF power measurements were performed before and after each SAR measurements to confirm the output power. © 2012 Comptest Services LLC Page 9 of 33 SAR Report This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written consent of CompTest Services LLC.

Applicant: Kyocera FCC ID: V65C5155 Report #: CT-C5156-9-0712-R1 4.6 Multiple Transmitters and Antennas SAR evaluations Licensed transmitters required routine SAR evaluation as followed by IEEE 1528 Supplement C 3G FCC SAR Procedures. Guidelines provided in FCC “SAR Evaluation Considerations for Handsets with Multiple Transmitters and antennas, February 2008” were followed for evaluation of the need for simultaneous transmission SAR testing. If the sum of measured 1g SAR is < 1.6 W/kg for all simultaneous transmitting antennas, or If the SAR-to-Peak-Location-Separation-Ratio for two simultaneous transmitting antennas is < 0.3, SAR evaluation for simultaneous transmission is not required. For an unlicensed transmitter such as 802.11 a/b/g and Bluetooth devices that does not transmit simultaneously with other transmitters and its output conducted power is < 60/f(GHz) mW, SAR evaluation is not required. If the handset contains unlicensed transmitters, which may simultaneously transmit with the licensed transmitter, the conducted output power of the unlicensed transmitter was measured and compared with the power reference (Pref) as shown in table 4.6. The antenna separation was determined by the closest distance between the antennas. Both criteria were evaluated to determine whether stand-alone SAR or simultaneous transmission SAR testing is required. Freq. Band: 2.45 GHz 5.15-5.35 GHz 5.47-5.85 GHz Pref (mW): 12 6 5 Table 4.6aUnlicensed Transmitter Output Power Threshold When there is simultaneous transmission - Standalone SAR not required when Output Power Antenna Separation (cm) ≤ Pref < 2.5 with other transmitters output power ≤ Pref or 1g SAR <1.2 W/kg ≤ Pref ≥ 2.5 and ≤ 5.0 ≤ 2*Pref ≥ 5.0 Table 4.6b Standalone SAR requirements When Stand-alone SAR measurements is required. SAR is tested on highest output channel for each wireless mode and exposure condition. If SAR for highest output channel is > 50% of SAR limit, all channels will be evaluated according to normal procedures. Simultaneous SAR not required when Unlicensed only: Standalone SAR is not required and antenna is > 5cm from other antennas Licensed & Sum of SAR is < 1.6 W/kG for each pair of simultaneous transmitting antennas Unlicensed: SAR to peak location separation ratio of simultaneous transmitting antenna pair is <0.3 Table 4.6c Simultaneous SAR requirements © 2012 Comptest Services LLC Page 10 of 33 SAR Report This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written consent of CompTest Services LLC.

Applicant: Kyocera FCC ID: V65C5155 Report #: CT-C5156-9-0712-R1 4.6.1 Bluetooth/WLAN Test Conditions 4.6.1.1 Bluetooth/WLAN RF Conducted Power Data Unlicensed transmitters are controlled by chipset based test mode software to establish maximum output power. Mode Data Rate CONDUCTED POWER (dBm) (Mbps) Ch 01 Ch 06 Ch 11 2412 MHz 2437 MHz 2462 MHz 802.11b 1 13.87 14.51 12.38 11 13.89 14.68 12.52 802.11g 6 12.57 13.35 10.78 54 10.32 10.70 9.02 802.11n MSC0 12.57 13.51 10.87 MSC7 9.97 10.28 8.69 WLAN supported: Yes No 1) Per KDB 248227, highest average output power channel for the lowest data rate are selected for SAR evaluation. Other IEEE802.11 modes (including 802.11n) are not investigated if the average output powers are not greater than 0.25dB than that of the corresponding channel in the lowest data rate IEEE802.11b mode. 2) SAR measurements were tested at the bolded data rate. Mode bolded in blue resulted in the highest SAR data. Based on the Antenna separation and output power, Stand-Alone and Simultaneous Transmission SAR testing requirements are listed below: MEASURED PARAMETERS (UNLICENSED TRANSMITTER) Transmitter: Bluetooth 802.11 Antenna Separation 4.5 cm 4.5 cm 3) Output Power 1 mW 71 mW 4) Standalone SAR No Yes Simultaneous TX SAR No No 5) Highest 1g SAR value, Body -- 0.84 (CDMA + WLAN) 3) Rounded to the nearest mW 4) Only highest power transmitter was tested, if applicable. 5) Voice call in head configuration is not supported with Bluetooth mode. © 2012 Comptest Services LLC Page 11 of 33 SAR Report This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written consent of CompTest Services LLC.

Applicant: Kyocera FCC ID: V65C5155 Report #: CT-C5156-9-0712-R1 4.7 Router SAR Evaluations For portable devices equipped with wireless router (Hotspot) feature, additional SAR evaluation is performed per interim guidelines provided at the October 2010 TCB Workshop. This device is not capable of functioning as a WiFi to Cellular mobile hotspot. Testing was not performed at 10 mm. 4.8 Hand SAR Evaluations When applicable, Hand SAR was evaluated with following test procedures:  Test separation distance: 0 (zero) mm  SAR is averaged over 10g of tissue Hand SAR required: Yes No © 2012 Comptest Services LLC Page 12 of 33 SAR Report This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written consent of CompTest Services LLC.

Applicant: Kyocera FCC ID: V65C5155 Report #: CT-C5156-9-0712-R1 4.9 SAR Tests in Mouth and Jaw Regions of the SAM Phantom Antennas located near the bottom of a phone may require SAR measurements around the mouth and jaw regions of the SAM head phantom. This typically applies to clam-shell style phones that are generally longer in the unfolded normal use positions or to certain older style long rectangular phones. It has been known for some time that there are SAR measurement difficulties in these regions of the SAM phantom. SAR probes are calibrated in tissue-equivalent liquids with sufficient separation between the probe sensors and nearby physical boundaries to ensure scattering does not affect probe calibration. When the probe tip is moved into tight regions with multiple boundaries surrounding its sensors, probe calibration and measurement accuracy can become questionable. In addition, these measurement locations often require a probe to be tilted at steep angles, where it may no longer comply with calibration requirements and measurement protocols, or satisfy the required measurement uncertainty. In some situations it is not feasible to tilt the probe or rotate the phantom, as suggested by measurement standards, to conduct these measurements. In order to ensure there is sufficient conservativeness for ensuring compliance until practical solutions are available, additional measurement considerations are necessary to address these technical difficulties. When measurements are required near the mouth, nose, jaw or similar tight regions of the SAM phantom, area or zoom scans are often unable to fully enclose the peak SAR location as required by IEEE 1528 and Supplement C, due to probe orientation and positioning difficulties. Even when limited measurements are possible, the test results could be questionable due to probe calibration and measurement uncertainty issues. Under these circumstances, the following procedures apply: The SAR required in these regions of SAM should be measured using a flat phantom.  Rectangular shaped phones should be positioned with its bottom edge positioned from the flat phantom with the same distance provided by the cheek touching position using SAM. The ear reference point (ERP, as defined for SAM) of the phone should be positioned ½ cm from the flat phantom shell.  Clam-shell phones should be positioned with the hinge against a smooth edge of the flat phantom where the upper half of the phone is unfolded and extended beyond the phantom side wall. The lower half of the phone is secured in the test device holder at a fixed distance below the flat phantom determined by the minimum separation along the lower edge of the phone in the cheek touching position using SAM. If there is substantial variation in separation distance along the lower edge of a clam- shell phone when placed in the cheek touching position using SAM, the FCC Laboratory may be contacted for additional guidance to position the phone for testing. The flat phantom data should allow test results to be compared uniformly across measurement systems, until suitable solutions are available in measurement standards to address certain probe calibration and positioning issues, due to implementation differences between horizontal and up- right SAM configurations. These flat phantom procedures are only applicable to stand-alone SAR evaluation in tight regions of the SAM phantom, where measurement is not feasible or test results can be questionable due to probe calibration and accessibility issues. Details on device positioning and photos showing how separation distances are determined should be included in the SAR report. SAR for other regions of the head must be evaluated using SAM; therefore, a phone with antennas at different locations may require flat and SAM phantom evaluation for the different antennas. When simultaneous transmission SAR evaluation is necessary in these regions of SAM and until practical solutions are available, the FCC Laboratory should be contacted for interim guidance. © 2012 Comptest Services LLC Page 13 of 33 SAR Report This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written consent of CompTest Services LLC.

Applicant: Kyocera FCC ID: V65C5155 Report #: CT-C5156-9-0712-R1 5 DESCRIPTION OF THE TEST EQUIPMENT 5.1 Dosimetric System The measurements were performed with an automated near-field scanning system (as shown in Figure 5.1), DASY4, manufactured by Schmid & Partner Engineering AG (SPEAG) of Zurich, Switzerland. The system is comprised of high precision robot, robot controller, computer, near-field probe, probe alignment sensor and the SAM phantom containing brain or muscle equivalent material. The measurement uncertainty budget is given in section 8. Below is a list of the calibrated equipment used for the measurements: Test Equipment Serial Number Cal. Due Date Used DASY4 DAE4 603 09-27-12 DASY4 DAE4 675 05-23-13 DASY4 DAE4 530 05-30-13 E-field Probe ET3DV6 1618 09-19-12 E-field Probe ES3DV3 3035 02-22-13 E-field Probe ES3DV3 3036 05-11-12 E-field Probe ES3DV3 3078 09-19-12 Dipole Validation kit, D835V2 467 09-02-12 Dipole Validation kit, D1900V2 5d016 09-07-12 Dipole Validation kit, D2450V2 776 07-09-13 The calibration records of E-field probe and dipoles are attached in Appendix C and Appendix D respectively. Figure 5.1 DASY 4 System © 2012 Comptest Services LLC Page 14 of 33 SAR Report This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written consent of CompTest Services LLC.

Applicant: Kyocera FCC ID: V65C5155 Report #: CT-C5156-9-0712-R1 5.1.1 Extended SAR Dipole Calibrations Dipoles are calibrated on a 2-year intervals. Return-loss and input impedances are measured annually to confirm in maintaining requirements per KDB Publication 450824 DO2, Dipole SAR Validation Verification v01:  Return Loss is <-20dB or within 20% of calibrated measurement  Impedance is within 5 of calibrated measurement 835 MHz - HEAD Dipole Return Loss Impedance () Date Description Comments S/N (dB) Real Img 09/02/10 Target -37.1 49.8 -1.4 Within 1 year of calibration 467 10/20/11 Measured -25.5 46.3 2.0 No physical damage found Delta 1900 MHz - HEAD Dipole Return Loss Impedance () Date Description Comments S/N (dB) Real Img 09/07/10 Target -27.0 51.2 4.4 Within 1 year of calibration 5d016 10/20/11 Measured -30.6 51.1 1.0 No physical damage found Delta © 2012 Comptest Services LLC Page 15 of 33 SAR Report This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written consent of CompTest Services LLC.

Applicant: Kyocera FCC ID: V65C5155 Report #: CT-C5156-9-0712-R1 5.2 Additional equipment needed in validation Test Equipment Serial Number Cal. Due Date Communication Test Set Agilent 8960 US41070147 10-20-12 Signal Generator, Agilent E4438C MY44270167 08-12-12 Power meter, Giga-tronics 8541C 1833762 11-21-12 Power Sensor, Giga-tronics 80601A 1831776 11-21-12 Network Analyzer, Agilent E5062A MY44100250 05-16-12 Electronic Calibration Module, Agilent 1763 05-16-12 Thermometer 186700 08-03-13 Dielectric Probe, HP 85070E -- No cal required 5.3 Tissue Stimulants All dielectric parameters of tissue stimulants were measured within 24 hours of SAR measurements. The depth of the tissue stimulant in the ear reference point and flat reference point of the phantom were at least 15 cm. during all the tests. The depth of the liquid is measured by running a program that brings the probe to the bottom surface of the phantom then raise it up 15 centimeters. The operator at this point performs a visual inspection and makes sure that the liquid level is at or above the probe tip. The list of ingredients and the percent composition used for the Head and Muscle tissue simulates are listed in the table below: 835 MHz 1700 MHz 1900 MHz 2450 MHz INGREDIENT HEAD MUSCLE HEAD MUSCLE HEAD MUSCLE HEAD MUSCLE Water 51.07% 65.45% 56.6% 68% 54% 69.91% 55 % 68.64% Cellulose 0.23% -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Glycol monobuthyl -- -- 43% 31.5% 44.91% 29.96% 45% 31.37% Sugar 47.31% 34.31% -- -- -- -- -- -- Preventol 0.24% 0.1% -- -- -- -- -- -- Salt 1.15% 0.62% 0.4% 0.5% 0.21% 0.13% -- -- The ingredients above are adopted from Application Note: Recipes for Head/Muscle Tissue Simulating Liquid by SPEAG. © 2012 Comptest Services LLC Page 16 of 33 SAR Report This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written consent of CompTest Services LLC.

Applicant: Kyocera FCC ID: V65C5155 Report #: CT-C5156-9-0712-R1 5.4 Phantoms Description SAM v4.0 phantom, manufactured by SPEAG, was used during the measurement. It has fiberglass shell integrated in a wooden table. The shape of the shell corresponds to the phantom defined in IEEE 1528/D1.2. It enables the dosimetric evaluation of left and right hand phone usage as well as body mounted usage at the flat phantom region. Reference markings on the phantom allow the complete set-up of all predefined phantom positions and measurement grids by manually teaching three points in the robot. The thickness of phantom shell is 2mm except for the ear, where an integrated ear spacer provides 6mm spacing from the tissue boundary. Manufacturer reports tolerance in shell thickness to be ± 0.1mm. Figure 5.4 SAM Twin Phantom © 2012 Comptest Services LLC Page 17 of 33 SAR Report This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written consent of CompTest Services LLC.

Applicant: Kyocera FCC ID: V65C5155 Report #: CT-C5156-9-0712-R1 5.5 Isotropic E-Field Probe Model:  ET3DV6  Symmetrical design with triangular core  Built-in optical fiber for surface detection system Construction:  Built-in shielding against static charges  PEEK enclosure material (resistant to organic solvents, e.g., glycol) Calibration:  Calibration certificate in Appendix C  10MHz to 3GHz (dosimetry); Linearity:  0.2dB (30MHz to Frequency: 3GHz) Optical Surface:   0.2mm repeatability in air and clear liquid over diffuse reflecting Detection:  Surface   0.2dB in HSL (rotation around probe axis) Directivity:   0.4dB in HSL (rotation normal to probe axis) Dynamic Range:  5 uW/g to > 100 mW/g; Linearity:  0.2dB  Overall length: 330mm  Tip length: 16mm Dimensions:  Body diameter: 12mm  Tip diameter: 6.8mm  Distance from probe tip to dipole centers: 2.7mm  General dosimetry up to 3GHz Application:  Compliance tests of mobile phones  Fast automatic scanning in arbitrary phantoms. © 2012 Comptest Services LLC Page 18 of 33 SAR Report This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written consent of CompTest Services LLC.

Applicant: Kyocera FCC ID: V65C5155 Report #: CT-C5156-9-0712-R1 6 SYSTEM VALIDATION The probes are calibrated annually by the manufacturer. Dielectric parameters of the stimulating liquids are measured with an automated Hewlett Packard 85070E dielectric probe in conjunction with an Agilent E5062A ENA serial network analyzer. The SAR measurements of the device were done within 24 hours of system accuracy verification, which was done using the dipole validation kit. Power level of 20dBm was supplied to a dipole antenna placed under the flat section of SAM phantom. The validation results are in the table below and printouts of the validation test are attached in Appendix A. All the measured parameters are within the specification. The system validation with head tissues was used for the device testing in muscle. Based on OET 65 Supplement C EAB Part 22/27/24 SAR review Reminder Sheet 01/2002, this is a valid test. System/Tissue Verification - HEAD Validation Dielectric SAR Parameters Freq. Temp. Comments Date Description (mW/g), εr σ (S/m) o (MHz) ( C) 1g FCC Reference*: 41.50 0.90 20-26 04/20/09 Target 0.967 From Speag Certificate 835 07/16/12 Measured 0.97 43.00 0.91 22±1 For device testing in Head. 07/17/12 Measured 0.98 42.70 0.91 22±1 For device testing in Head. FCC Reference*: 40.00 1.40 20-26 09/07/10 Target 3.96 From Speag Certificate 1900 07/11/12 Measured 4.01 38.60 1.40 22±1 For device testing in Head. 07/12/12 Measured 4.07 39.20 1.43 22±1 For device testing in Head. 07/16/12 Measured 3.92 38.60 1.41 22±1 For device testing in Head. FCC Reference*: 39.20 1.80 20-26 09/07/10 Target 5.32 From Speag Certificate 2450 08/06/12 Measured 5.15 38.70 1.86 22±1 For device testing in Head. 08/07/12 Measured 5.11 38.80 1.87 22±1 For device testing in Head. © 2012 Comptest Services LLC Page 19 of 33 SAR Report This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written consent of CompTest Services LLC.

Applicant: Kyocera FCC ID: V65C5155 Report #: CT-C5156-9-0712-R1 System/Tissue Verification - BODY Validation Dielectric Freq. SAR Parameters Temp. Comments Date Description o (MHz) (mW/g), 1g εr σ (S/m) ( C) FCC Reference*: 55.2 0.97 20-26 835 04/20/09 Target 0.995 From Speag Certificate 07/18/12 Measured 0.94 54.60 0.94 22±1 For device testing in Muscle FCC Reference*: 53.3 1.52 20-26 1900 09/07/10 Target 4.01 From Speag Certificate 07/17/12 Measured 4.08 51.70 1.52 22±1 For device testing in Muscle FCC Reference*: 52.7 1.95 20-26 2450 07/09/12 Target 5.28 From Speag Certificate 08/07/12 Measured 4.83 52.80 1.92 22±1 For device testing in Muscle *FCC reference values are adopted from OET Bulletin 65 (97-01) Supplement C (01-01). When applicable, the measured 10g SAR were verified within 10% of the expected target values for Hand SAR measurements. © 2012 Comptest Services LLC Page 20 of 33 SAR Report This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written consent of CompTest Services LLC.

Applicant: Kyocera FCC ID: V65C5155 Report #: CT-C5156-9-0712-R1 7 DESCRIPTION OF THE TEST PROCEDURE Measurements were made on both left hand side and right hand side of the phantom. The device was position against phantom according to OET Bulletin 65 (97-01) Supplement C (01-01). Definitions of terms used in aligning the device to a head phantom are available in IEEE Standard P1528/D1.2 “Recommended Practice for Determining the Spatial-Peak Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) in the Human Body Due to Wireless Communications Devices: Experimental Techniques” 7.1 Test Positions The device was placed in the holder. The bottom of the device aligns with the bottom of the holder clamp to provide a standard positioning and ensure enough free space for antenna. Device holder was provided by SPEAG together with DASY4. 7.1.1 Initial Ear Position The device was initially positioned with the earpiece region pressed against the ear spacer of a head phantom parallel to the “Neck-Front” (N-F) line defined along the base of the ear spacer that contains the “Ear Reference Point” (ERP). The “test device reference point” (point A) is aligned to the ERP on the head phantom and the “vertical centerline” is aligned to the “phantom reference plane”. vertical center line wt/2 wt/2 . horizonta l line A acousti c output B bottom of handset wb/2 wb/2 Figure 7-1a – Handset vertical and Figure 7-1b - Close up side view of horizontal reference lines. phantom showing the ear region. © 2012 Comptest Services LLC Page 21 of 33 SAR Report This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written consent of CompTest Services LLC.

Applicant: Kyocera FCC ID: V65C5155 Report #: CT-C5156-9-0712-R1 7.1.2 Cheek Position “Initial ear position” alignments are maintained and the device is brought toward the mouth of the head phantom by pivoting along the “Neck-Front” line until any point on the display, keypad or mouthpiece portions of the handset is in contact with the phantom or when any portion of a foldout, sliding or similar keypad cover opened to its intended self-adjusting normal use position is in contact with the cheek or mouth of the phantom. Figure 7.1c - Phone position 1, “cheek” or “touch” position. 7.1.3 Tilt Position In the “cheek position”, if the earpiece of the device is not in full contact with the phantom’s ear spacer and the peak SAR location for the “cheek position” is located at the ear spacer region or corresponds to the earpiece region of the handset, the device is returned to the “initial ear position” by rotating it away from the mouth until the earpiece is in full contact with the ear spacer. Otherwise, the device is moved away from the cheek perpendicular to the line passes through both “ear reference points” for approximate 2-3cm. While it is in this position, the device is tilted away from the mouth with respect to the “test device reference point” by 15o. After the tilt, it is then moved back toward the head perpendicular to the line passes through both “ear reference point” until the device touches the phantom or the ear spacer. If the antenna touches the head first, the positioning process is repeated with a tilt angle less than 15o so that the device and its antenna would touch the phantom simultaneously. Figure 7.1d - Phone position 2, “tilted” position. © 2012 Comptest Services LLC Page 22 of 33 SAR Report This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written consent of CompTest Services LLC.

Applicant: Kyocera FCC ID: V65C5155 Report #: CT-C5156-9-0712-R1 7.1.4 Body Worn Configuration Body worn accessories, when available, were tested for the FCC RF exposure compliance. The device was positioned into the carrying case and placed below the flat phantom. Hands-free headset was connected during measurements. The SAR levels were also measured with air space for the hands-free application, which allow user to use other body-worn accessories that contains no metal and provides at least specified separation from the closest point of the handset to the body. 7.2 Scan Procedures First, coarse scans are used for a quick determination of the field distribution. Then an area scan measures all reachable points, it computes all of the field maxima found in the scanned area, within a range of 2dB as specified in IEEE P1528, (see the configuration below). For cases where multiple maxima were detected, the number of zoom scans could be increased accordingly. Next a cube scan, 7x7x7 points (spacing between each point is 5x5x5mm), is performed around the highest E-field value to determine the averaged SAR-distribution over 1g. If two peaks are within 2dB of the highest one, two zoom scans are performed to provide the evaluations. A fine resolution volume scan determines the one-gram average SAR for both peaks. 7.3 SAR Averaging Methods The maximum SAR value is average over its volume using interpolation and extrapolation. The interpolation of the points is done with a 3d-Spline. The 3d-Spline is composed of three one- dimensional splines with the “Not a knot” –condition [W. Gander, Computermathematik, p. 141-150] (x, y and z – directions) [numerical Recipes in C, Second Edition, p 123]. The extrapolation is based on least square algorithm [W. Gander, Computermathematik, p. 168- 180]. Through the points in the first 30mm in all z-axis, polynomials of order four are calculated. This polynomial is then used to evaluate the points between the surface and the probe tip. The points, calculated from the surface, have a distance of 1mm from one another. © 2012 Comptest Services LLC Page 23 of 33 SAR Report This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written consent of CompTest Services LLC.

Applicant: Kyocera FCC ID: V65C5155 Report #: CT-C5156-9-0712-R1 8 MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY Table 8.1 shows the uncertainty budget for SAR assessment according to IEEE P1528. Stand. Uncert Prob 1 2 Ci Uncert Vi or Uncertainty Description . Value . Div 1g (1g) Veff ( %) Dist. (%) Measurement system Probe calibration 5.9 N 1 1 5.9 ∞ Axial isotropy 4.7 R √3 0.7 1.9 ∞ Hemispherical Isotropy 9.6 R √3 0.7 3.9 ∞ Boundary effects 1.0 R √3 1 0.6 ∞ Linearity 4.7 R √3 1 2.7 ∞ System Detection limit 1.0 R √3 1 0.6 ∞ Readout Electronics 0.3 N 1 1 0.3 ∞ Response Time 0.8 R √3 1 0.5 ∞ Integration Time 2.6 R √3 1 1.5 ∞ RF ambient conditions 3.0 R √3 1 1.7 ∞ Mech. Constrains of robot 0.4 R √3 1 0.2 ∞ Probe positioning 2 9 R √3 1 1.7 ∞ Max. SAR Evaluation (ext., int., avg.) 1.0 R √3 1 0.6 ∞ Test Sample Related Device positioning 3.0 N 1 1 .0 ∞ Device Holder 3.6 N 1 1 3.6 ∞ Power drift 5.0 N √3 1 2.9 ∞ Phantom and setup Phantom uncertainty 4.0 R √3 1 2.3 ∞ Liquid conductivity (target) 5.0 R √3 0.64 1.8 ∞ Liquid conductivity (meas.) 3.5 N 1 0.64 2.2 ∞ Liquid permittivity (target) 5 0 √3 0.6 1.7 ∞ Liquid permittivity (meas.) 3.5 N 1 0.6 2.1 ∞ Combined Standard Uncertainty: 11.0 Extended Standard Uncertainty ( =2): 22.1 N: Normal R: Rectangular Table 8.1 Worst-Case uncertainty budget for SAR assessment © 2012 Comptest Services LLC Page 24 of 33 SAR Report This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written consent of CompTest Services LLC.

Applicant: Kyocera FCC ID: V65C5155 Report #: CT-C5156-9-0712-R1 9 TEST DATA The following tables list the SAR results in each configuration and operating mode. The channels tested for each configuration have similar SAR distributions. Highest SAR (bold blue color) plots for each configuration is provided in Appendix B. 9.1 Head SAR Test Results 9.1.1 Cellular BC-0 CDMA 800 Channel: 1013 384 777 BC-0 HEAD Frequency (MHz): 824.70 836.49 848.31 Phone Mode Test Position Battery SAR, 1g (W/kg) Configuration Left Cheek Standard -- 0.55 -- Left Tilt Standard -- 0.29 -- Closed Right Cheek Standard -- 0.48 -- Right Tilt Standard -- 0.29 -- RC3- SO55 Left Cheek Standard 0.98 0.96 0.91 Left Tilt Standard -- 0.26 -- Open Right Cheek Standard -- 0.44 -- Right Tilt Standard -- 0.19 -- Note: 1. All modes of operation were evaluated and the worst case results are reported. 2. SAR Test Reduction procedures applied, marking “--“ 3. SAR measurements in open configuration next to ear are additional data for use conditions that could be possible but not expected to be a normal use configuration. © 2012 Comptest Services LLC Page 25 of 33 SAR Report This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written consent of CompTest Services LLC.

Applicant: Kyocera FCC ID: V65C5155 Report #: CT-C5156-9-0712-R1 9.1.2 PCS BC-1 CDMA 1900 Channel: 25 600 1175 BC-1 HEAD Frequency (MHz): 1851.25 1880 1908.75 Phone Mode Test Position Battery SAR, 1g (W/kg) Configuration Left Cheek Standard 1.17 1.36 1.36 Left Tilt Standard 0.76 0.90 0.77 Closed Right Cheek Standard 0.73 0.93 0.93 Right Tilt Standard 0.75 0.90 0.71 RC3- SO55 Left Cheek Standard 0.96 1.10 1.08 Left Tilt Standard - 0.47 - Open Right Cheek Standard - 0.51 - Right Tilt Standard - 0.55 - Note: 1. All modes of operation were evaluated and the worst case results are reported. 2. SAR Test Reduction procedures applied, marking “--“ 3. SAR measurements in open configuration next to ear are additional data for use conditions that could be possible but not expected to be a normal use configuration. © 2012 Comptest Services LLC Page 26 of 33 SAR Report This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written consent of CompTest Services LLC.

Applicant: Kyocera FCC ID: V65C5155 Report #: CT-C5156-9-0712-R1 9.1.3 WLAN Band WLAN 2450 Channel: 1 6 11 HEAD Frequency (MHz): 2412 2437 2462 Phone Mode Test Position Battery SAR, 1g (W/kg) Configuration Left Cheek Standard -- 0.06 -- Left Tilt Standard -- 0.07 -- Closed Right Cheek Standard -- 0.07 -- Right Tilt Standard -- 0.13 -- 802.11b Left Cheek Standard -- 0.01 -- Left Tilt Standard -- 0.05 -- Open Right Cheek Standard -- 0.04 -- Right Tilt Standard -- 0.06 -- Note: 1. All modes of operation were evaluated and the worst case results are reported. 2. SAR Test Reduction procedures applied, marking “--“ 3. SAR measurements in open configuration next to ear are additional data for use conditions that could be possible but not expected to be a normal use configuration. © 2012 Comptest Services LLC Page 27 of 33 SAR Report This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written consent of CompTest Services LLC.

Applicant: Kyocera FCC ID: V65C5155 Report #: CT-C5156-9-0712-R1 9.2 Body-Worn SAR Test Results 9.2.1 Cellular BC-0 CDMA 800 Channel: 1013 384 777 BC-0 BODY Frequency (MHz): 824.70 836.49 848.31 Spacing Phone Mode Accessory Side SAR, 1g (W/kg) (mm) Config. Back -- 0.70 -- Closed Front -- 0.44 -- RC3 – Air 15 SO55 Back -- 0.70 -- Open Front -- 0.52 -- Note: 1. Battery used: Standard Extended 2. All modes of operation were evaluated and the worst case results are reported. 3. SAR Test Reduction procedures applied, marking “--“ © 2012 Comptest Services LLC Page 28 of 33 SAR Report This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written consent of CompTest Services LLC.

Applicant: Kyocera FCC ID: V65C5155 Report #: CT-C5156-9-0712-R1 9.2.2 PCS Band CDMA 1900 Channel: 25 600 1175 BODY Frequency (MHz): 1851.25 1880 1908.75 Spacing Phone Mode Accessory Side SAR, 1g (W/kg) (mm) Config. Back -- 0.75 -- Closed Front -- 0.49 -- RC3 – Air 15 SO55 Back -- 0.48 -- Open Front -- 0.31 -- Note: 1. Battery used: Standard Extended 2. All modes of operation were evaluated and the worst case results are reported. 3. SAR Test Reduction procedures applied, marking “--“ © 2012 Comptest Services LLC Page 29 of 33 SAR Report This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written consent of CompTest Services LLC.

Applicant: Kyocera FCC ID: V65C5155 Report #: CT-C5156-9-0712-R1 9.2.3 WLAN Band WLAN 2450 Channel: 1 6 11 BODY Frequency (MHz): 2412 2437 2462 Spacing Phone Mode Accessory Side SAR, 1g (W/kg) (mm) Config. Back -- 0.09 -- Closed Front -- 0.02 -- 802.11b Air 15 Back -- 0.03 -- Open Front -- 0.03 -- Note: 1. Battery used: Standard Extended 2. All modes of operation were evaluated and the worst-case results are reported. 3. SAR Test Reduction procedures applied, marking “--“ 4. The device does not support held-to-ear operation in WLAN/BT mode. Only Body-worn conditions apply. © 2012 Comptest Services LLC Page 30 of 33 SAR Report This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written consent of CompTest Services LLC.

Applicant: Kyocera FCC ID: V65C5155 Report #: CT-C5156-9-0712-R1 10 SIMULTANEOUS SAR EVALUATION 10.1 Summation of Highest Measured SAR Values Phone CLOSED, Head, 1g SAR (W/kg) Configuration CDMA WLAN SAR Left Cheek 1.36 0.06 1.42 Left Tilt 0.90 0.07 0.97 Right Cheek 0.93 0.07 1.00 Right Tilt 0.90 0.13 1.03 Phone OPEN, Head, 1g SAR (W/kg) Configuration CDMA WLAN SAR Left Cheek 1.10 0.01 1.11 Left Tilt 0.47 0.05 0.52 Right Cheek 0.51 0.04 0.55 Right Tilt 0.55 0.05 0.60 Note: 1. SAR Test was not required due to exclusions listed in section 4.7, marking “ ** “ 2. Volumetric SAR summation is not required since the numerical Sums are below the limits. © 2012 Comptest Services LLC Page 31 of 33 SAR Report This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written consent of CompTest Services LLC.

Applicant: Kyocera FCC ID: V65C5155 Report #: CT-C5156-9-0712-R1 10.2 Summation of Highest Scaled SAR Values Phone CLOSED, Head, 1g SAR (W/kg) CDMA at WLAN at Configuration SAR 25.1 dBm 18.5 dBm Left Cheek 1.52 0.06 1.58 Left Tilt 0.99 0.07 1.06 Right Cheek 1.01 0.07 1.08 Right Tilt 0.98 0.13 1.11 Phone OPEN, Head, 1g SAR (W/kg) CDMA at WLAN at Configuration SAR 25.1 dBm 18.5 dBm Left Cheek 1.20 0.01 1.21 Left Tilt 0.51 0.05 0.56 Right Cheek 0.55 0.04 0.59 Right Tilt 0.60 0.05 0.65 Note: 1. SAR Test was not required due to exclusions listed in section 4.7, marking “ ** “ 2. Volumetric SAR summation is not required since the numerical Sums are below the limits. 3. The highest measured SAR values are scaled to maximum rated output power (using formula: Scaled_ SAR = Measured_SAR*10^(Power Delta/10)) at following modes:  CDMA: 25.1 dBm,  WLAN: 18.5dBm. © 2012 Comptest Services LLC Page 32 of 33 SAR Report This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written consent of CompTest Services LLC.

Applicant: Kyocera FCC ID: V65C5155 Report #: CT-C5156-9-0712-R1 11 LIST OF APPENDIX Appendix Description Note A Validation Test Plots Please see separate attachment B SAR Distribution Plots Please see separate attachment C Probe Calibration Certificate Please see separate attachment D Dipole Calibration Certificate Please see separate attachment E EUT Setup Photos Please see separate attachment © 2012 Comptest Services LLC Page 33 of 33 SAR Report This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written consent of CompTest Services LLC.


Document Created: 2012-08-28 14:40:40
Document Modified: 2012-08-28 14:40:40
© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC