55234RAN.004 - RF exposure evaluation

FCC ID: UKCWRD0B

RF Exposure Info

Download: PDF
FCCID_4313370

DEKRA Testing and Certification, S.A.U. Parque Tecnológico de Andalucía, c/ Severo Ochoa nº 2 · 29590 Campanillas · Málaga · España C.I.F. A29 507 456 Test report No: NIE: 55234RAN.004 Assessment report RF EXPOSURE REPORT ACCORDING TO FCC 47 CFR Part 2.1091 ISED RSS-102 Issue 5:2015 Identification of item tested Electronic Reader Series including all mechanical variants Trademark XS4 Wall Reader 2.0 Model and /or type reference WRD0B, WRD0J, WRD0S (type reference: P1619) Other identification of the product FCC ID: UKCWRD0B IC: 10088A-WRD0B Hw version: 1.0 Sw version: WRD0B: 0152 (Control Firmware) + 0136 (BGM111 Firmware) WRD0J: 0153 (Control Firmware) + 0136 (BGM111 Firmware) WRD0S: 0130 (Control Firmware) Features WRD0B and WRD0J contain a certified Bluetooth module (BGM111) WRD0S contains a certified Bluetooth module (DirectKey) Manufacturer SALTO Systems, S.L. Arkotz 9, Polígono Lanbarren 20180, Oiartzun, Gipuzkoa, SPAIN Test method requested, standard FCC 47 CFR Part 2.1091 Radiofrequency radiation exposure evaluation: mobile devices. ISED RSS-102 Issue 5 (2015-03) – Radio Frequency Exposure Compliance of Radiocommunication Apparatus (All Frequency Bands) Summary IN COMPLIANCE Approved by (name / position & signature) Miguel Lacave MIGUEL LACAVE Antennas Lab Manager GARCÍA 2018.12.17 10:17:08 +01'00' Date of issue 2018-12-17 Report template No FAN24_01 Report No: (NIE) 55234RAN.004 2018-12-17

DEKRA Testing and Certification, S.A.U. Parque Tecnológico de Andalucía, c/ Severo Ochoa nº 2 · 29590 Campanillas · Málaga · España C.I.F. A29 507 456 Index Competences and guarantees .................................................................................................... 3 General conditions ...................................................................................................................... 3 Identification of the client............................................................................................................. 3 General description of the device under evaluation ..................................................................... 4 Assessment summary................................................................................................................. 5 Appendix A: FCC RF Exposure................................................................................................... 6 FCC RF Exposure evaluation for mobile devices.................................................................... 7 FCC MPE Evaluation Results ................................................................................................. 8 Appendix B: ISED RF Exposure................................................................................................ 13 ISED RF Exposure evaluation for mobile devices................................................................. 14 ISED MPE Evaluation Results .............................................................................................. 15 Report No: (NIE) 55234RAN.004 Page 2 of 19 2018-12-17

DEKRA Testing and Certification, S.A.U. Parque Tecnológico de Andalucía, c/ Severo Ochoa nº 2 · 29590 Campanillas · Málaga · España C.I.F. A29 507 456 Competences and guarantees In order to assure the traceability to other national and international laboratories, DEKRA has a calibration and maintenance program for its measurement equipment. DEKRA guarantees the reliability of the data presented in this report, which is the result of the measurements and the tests performed to the item under test on the date and under the conditions stated on the report and, it is based on the knowledge and technical facilities available at DEKRA at the time of performance of the test. DEKRA is liable to the client for the maintenance of the confidentiality of all information related to the item under test and the results of the test. The results presented in this Assessment Report apply only to the particular item under test established in this document. IMPORTANT: No parts of this report may be reproduced or quoted out of context, in any form or by any means, except in full, without the previous written permission of DEKRA. General conditions 1. This report is only referred to the item that has undergone the assessment. 2. This report does not constitute or imply on its own an approval of the product by the Certification Bodies or competent Authorities. 3. This document is only valid if complete; no partial reproduction can be made without previous written permission of DEKRA. 4. This assessment report cannot be used partially or in full for publicity and/or promotional purposes without previous written permission of DEKRA and the Accreditation Bodies. Identification of the client SALTO Systems, S.L. Arkotz 9, Polígono Lanbarren 20180, Oiartzun, Gipuzkoa, SPAIN Report No: (NIE) 55234RAN.004 Page 3 of 19 2018-12-17

DEKRA Testing and Certification, S.A.U. Parque Tecnológico de Andalucía, c/ Severo Ochoa nº 2 · 29590 Campanillas · Málaga · España C.I.F. A29 507 456 General description of the device under evaluation The device under evaluation consists of an electronic reader series XS4 Wall Reader 2.0, with Bluetooth smart (BGM111 module for models WRD0B and WRD0J and DirectKey for model WRD0S) and ISO14443A & ISO15693 standard based technology. During its normal use the separation distance between the antenna and the user will be greater than 20 cm. Supported Features Bluetooth Bluetooth Model NFC ISO 14443-A NFC ISO 15693 module BGM111 module DirectKey WRD0B Yes Yes Yes No WRD0J Yes Yes Yes No WRD0S Yes Yes No Yes Table 1: Equipment variants and supported features The equipment specifications declared by the manufacturer for each supported feature are: Maximum Maximum radiated Band Maximum RF Technology antenna gain power (E.I.R.P.) (MHz) output power (dBm) (dBi) (dBm) 13.553-13.567 NFC 25.0 N/A 25.0 2402.0-2480.0 Bluetooth BGM111 8.0 1.0 9.0 2402.0-2480.0 Bluetooth DirectKey 2.8 0.5 3.3 Table 2: Equipment specifications Report No: (NIE) 55234RAN.004 Page 4 of 19 2018-12-17

DEKRA Testing and Certification, S.A.U. Parque Tecnológico de Andalucía, c/ Severo Ochoa nº 2 · 29590 Campanillas · Málaga · España C.I.F. A29 507 456 Assessment summary Radiofrequency radiation exposure limits FCC 47 CFR § 2.1091 & ISED RSS-102 Issue 5 (2015-03) Band VERDICT Assessment Technology (MHz) (Pass/Fail) 1 13.5 NFC Pass 2 2450 Bluetooth BGM111 Pass 3 2450 Blutooth DirectKey Pass Table 3: Assessment summary Report No: (NIE) 55234RAN.004 Page 5 of 19 2018-12-17

DEKRA Testing and Certification, S.A.U. Parque Tecnológico de Andalucía, c/ Severo Ochoa nº 2 · 29590 Campanillas · Málaga · España C.I.F. A29 507 456 Appendix A: FCC RF Exposure Report No: (NIE) 55234RAN.004 Page 6 of 19 2018-12-17

DEKRA Testing and Certification, S.A.U. Parque Tecnológico de Andalucía, c/ Severo Ochoa nº 2 · 29590 Campanillas · Málaga · España C.I.F. A29 507 456 FCC RF Exposure evaluation for mobile devices Devices operating in standalone mobile device exposure conditions may contain a single transmitter or multiple transmitters that do not transmit simultaneously. A minimum test separation distance ≥ 20 cm is required between the antenna and radiating structures of the device and nearby persons to apply mobile device exposure limits. The distance must be at least 20 cm and fully supported by the operating and installation configurations of the transmitter and its antenna(s), according to the source-based time-averaged maximum power requirements of § 2.1091(d)(2). In cases where cable losses or other attenuations are applied to determine compliance, the most conservative operating configurations and exposure conditions must be evaluated. The minimum test separation distance required for a device to comply with mobile device exposure conditions must be clearly identified in the installation and operating instructions, for all installation and exposure conditions, to enable users and installers to comply with RF exposure requirements. For mobile devices that have the potential to operate in portable device exposure conditions, similar to the configurations described in § 2.1091(d)(4), a KDB inquiry is required to determine the SAR test requirements for demonstrating compliance. When a device qualifies for the categorical exclusion provision of § 2.1091(c), the minimum test separation distance may be estimated, when applicable, by simple calculations according to plane-wave equivalent conditions, to ensure the transmitter and its antenna(s) can operate in manners that meet or exceed the estimated distance. The source-based time-averaged maximum radiated power, according to the maximum antenna gain, must be applied to calculate the field strength and power density required to establish the minimum test separation distance. When the estimated test separation distance becomes overly conservative and does not support compliance, MPE measurement or computational modeling may be used to determine the required minimum separation distance. According to §1.1310 Radiofrequency radiation exposure limits, paragraph (e), the limits for Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields are: Report No: (NIE) 55234RAN.004 Page 7 of 19 2018-12-17

DEKRA Testing and Certification, S.A.U. Parque Tecnológico de Andalucía, c/ Severo Ochoa nº 2 · 29590 Campanillas · Málaga · España C.I.F. A29 507 456 FCC MPE Evaluation Results Each supported transmission technology will be evaluated to determine if it is in compliance with limits for Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields. In order to perform the assessment, the following equations have been used for the calculations; these equations are accurate in the far-field of an antenna and will over-predict power density in the near field, where they could be used for making a "worst case" or conservative prediction: PE .I .R.P. [mW ] Power density: S[mW / cm 2 ]  4R[cm]2 PE .I .R.P. [mW ] Minimum compliance distance: R min [cm]  4S[mW / cm 2 ] Where: S = power density PE . I . R.P. = Equivalent isotropically radiated power R = distance to the center of radiation of the antenna (evaluation distance) Rmin = distance to the center of radiation of the antenna Report No: (NIE) 55234RAN.004 Page 8 of 19 2018-12-17

DEKRA Testing and Certification, S.A.U. Parque Tecnológico de Andalucía, c/ Severo Ochoa nº 2 · 29590 Campanillas · Málaga · España C.I.F. A29 507 456 Assessment 1 – NFC – 13.5 MHz Band Maximum output power (dBm): 25.0 Maximum antenna Gain (dBi): N/A Minimum use distance (cm): 20.0 Worst Case Frequency (MHz): 13.56 Maximum EIRP (dBm): 25.0 Maximum EIRP (mW): 316.23 General population - Power density limit (mW/cm 2): 0.98 Power density at minimum use distance: Power density (mW/cm 2): 0.063 General population - Power density limit (mW/cm 2): 0.98 Verdict for general population: PASS The power density level for this transmission mode is below general population exposure power density limit. Minimum compliance distance for this technology: Minimum compliance distance for general population (cm): 5.07 Minimum use distance (cm): 20.0 Verdict for general population: PASS The minimum use distance is greater than general population exposure minimum compliance distance. Report No: (NIE) 55234RAN.004 Page 9 of 19 2018-12-17

DEKRA Testing and Certification, S.A.U. Parque Tecnológico de Andalucía, c/ Severo Ochoa nº 2 · 29590 Campanillas · Málaga · España C.I.F. A29 507 456 Assessment 2 – Bluetooth BGM111 – 2450 MHz Band Maximum output power (dBm): 8.0 Maximum antenna Gain (dBi): 1.0 Minimum use distance (cm): 20.0 Worst Case Frequency (MHz): 2402.0 Maximum EIRP (dBm): 9.0 Maximum EIRP (mW): 7.94 General population - Power density limit (mW/cm 2): 1.0 Power density at minimum use distance: Power density (mW/cm2): 0.0016 General population - Power density limit (mW/cm 2): 1.0 Verdict for general population: PASS The power density level for this transmission mode is below general population exposure power density limit. Minimum compliance distance for this technology: Minimum compliance distance for general population (cm): 0.80 Minimum use distance (cm): 20.0 Verdict for general population: PASS The minimum use distance is greater than general population exposure minimum compliance distance. Report No: (NIE) 55234RAN.004 Page 10 of 19 2018-12-17

DEKRA Testing and Certification, S.A.U. Parque Tecnológico de Andalucía, c/ Severo Ochoa nº 2 · 29590 Campanillas · Málaga · España C.I.F. A29 507 456 Assessment 3 – Bluetooth DirectKey – 2450 MHz Band Maximum output power (dBm): 2.8 Maximum antenna gain (dBi): 0.5 Minimum use distance (m): 0.20 Worst Case Frequency (MHz): 2402.0 Maximum E.I.R.P (dBm): 3.3 Maximum E.I.R.P (W): 0.0021 Power density reference level (W/m 2): 10.0 Power density at minimum use distance: Power density (W/m 2): 0.00425 Power density reference level (W/m 2): 10.0 Verdict: PASS The power density level for this transmission mode is below power density reference level. Minimum compliance distance for this technology: Minimum compliance distance to meet reference level (m): 0.0041 Minimum use distance (m): 0.20 Verdict: PASS The minimum use distance for the device is greater than minimum compliance distance to meet the reference level. Report No: (NIE) 55234RAN.004 Page 11 of 19 2018-12-17

DEKRA Testing and Certification, S.A.U. Parque Tecnológico de Andalucía, c/ Severo Ochoa nº 2 · 29590 Campanillas · Málaga · España C.I.F. A29 507 456 Multiple frequencies assessment When multiple sources are introduced into an environment, it becomes necessary to address the sources interdependently, since each source will contribute some percentage of the maximum exposure toward the total exposure at a fixed location. The sum of the ratios of the exposure from each source to the corresponding maximum exposure for the frequency of each source must be evaluated. The exposure complies with the maximum permissible exposure if the sum of the ratios is less than unity: n Si  <1 i 1 MPE i Where Si is the power density of each source; MPEi is the power density basic restriction of each source. The worst case of simultaneous transmission for all model variants is found for the WRD0B and WRD0J models. These models are able to transmit simultaneously using NFC and Bluetooth module BGM111. The multiple frequencies calculation will be as follow: 0.063 0.002 + = 0.064 + 0.002 = 0.066 < 1 Limit 0.98 1 Report No: (NIE) 55234RAN.004 Page 12 of 19 2018-12-17

DEKRA Testing and Certification, S.A.U. Parque Tecnológico de Andalucía, c/ Severo Ochoa nº 2 · 29590 Campanillas · Málaga · España C.I.F. A29 507 456 Appendix B: ISED RF Exposure Report No: (NIE) 55234RAN.004 Page 13 of 19 2018-12-17

DEKRA Testing and Certification, S.A.U. Parque Tecnológico de Andalucía, c/ Severo Ochoa nº 2 · 29590 Campanillas · Málaga · España C.I.F. A29 507 456 ISED RF Exposure evaluation for mobile devices According to RSS-102 Issue 5, Paragraph “4. Exposure Limits”, Industry of Canada has adopted the RF field strength limits established in Health Canada’s RF exposure guideline, Safety code 6: Report No: (NIE) 55234RAN.004 Page 14 of 19 2018-12-17

DEKRA Testing and Certification, S.A.U. Parque Tecnológico de Andalucía, c/ Severo Ochoa nº 2 · 29590 Campanillas · Málaga · España C.I.F. A29 507 456 ISED MPE Evaluation Results Each supported transmission technology will be evaluated to determine if it is in compliance with RSS-102 Issue 5, RF Field Strength Limits for devices used by the General Public. In order to perform the assessment, the following equations have been used for the calculations; these equations are accurate in the far-field of an antenna and will over-predict power density in the near field, where they could be used for making a "worst case" or conservative prediction: PE .I .R. P.[W ] Power density: S [W / m 2 ]  4R[m]2 PE . I . R. P. [W ] Minimum compliance distance: Rmin [ m]  4 S [W / m 2 ] Where: S = power density PE . I . R.P. = Equivalent isotropically radiated power R = distance to the center of radiation of the antenna (evaluation distance) Rmin = distance to the center of radiation of the antenna Report No: (NIE) 55234RAN.004 Page 15 of 19 2018-12-17

DEKRA Testing and Certification, S.A.U. Parque Tecnológico de Andalucía, c/ Severo Ochoa nº 2 · 29590 Campanillas · Málaga · España C.I.F. A29 507 456 Assessment 1 – NFC – 13.5 MHz Band Maximum output power (dBm): 25.0 Maximum antenna gain (dBi): N/A Minimum use distance (m): 0.2 Worst Case Frequency (MHz): 13.56 Maximum EIRP (dBm): 25.0 Maximum EIRP (W): 0.32 General public - Power density limit (W/m 2): 2.0 Power density at minimum use distance: Power density (W/m 2): 0.63 General public - Power density limit (W/m 2): 2.0 Verdict for general public: PASS The power density level for this transmission mode is below general public power density limit. Minimum compliance distance for this technology: Minimum compliance distance for general public (m): 0.112 Minimum use distance (m): 0.2 Verdict for general public: PASS The minimum use distance is greater than general public minimum compliance distance. Report No: (NIE) 55234RAN.004 Page 16 of 19 2018-12-17

DEKRA Testing and Certification, S.A.U. Parque Tecnológico de Andalucía, c/ Severo Ochoa nº 2 · 29590 Campanillas · Málaga · España C.I.F. A29 507 456 Assessment 2 – Bluetooth BGM111 – 2450 MHz Band Maximum output power (dBm): 8.0 Maximum antenna gain (dBi): 1.0 Minimum use distance (m): 0.2 Worst Case Frequency (MHz): 2402.0 Maximum EIRP (dBm): 9.0 Maximum EIRP (W): 0.01 General public - Power density limit (W/m 2): 5.35 Power density at minimum use distance: Power density (W/m 2): 0.016 General public - Power density limit (W/m 2): 5.35 Verdict for general public: PASS The power density level for this transmission mode is below general public power density limit. Minimum compliance distance for this technology: Minimum compliance distance for general public (m): 0.011 Minimum use distance (m): 0.2 Verdict for general public: PASS The minimum use distance is greater than general public minimum compliance distance. Report No: (NIE) 55234RAN.004 Page 17 of 19 2018-12-17

DEKRA Testing and Certification, S.A.U. Parque Tecnológico de Andalucía, c/ Severo Ochoa nº 2 · 29590 Campanillas · Málaga · España C.I.F. A29 507 456 Assessment 3 – Bluetooth DirectKey – 2450 MHz Band Maximum output power (dBm): 2.8 Maximum antenna gain (dBi): 0.5 Minimum use distance (m): 0.20 Worst Case Frequency (MHz): 2402.0 Maximum E.I.R.P (dBm): 3.3 Maximum E.I.R.P (W): 0.0021 Power density reference level (W/m 2): 10.0 Power density at minimum use distance: Power density (W/m 2): 0.00425 Power density reference level (W/m 2): 10.0 Verdict: PASS The power density level for this transmission mode is below power density reference level. Minimum compliance distance for this technology: Minimum compliance distance to meet reference level (m): 0.0041 Minimum use distance (m): 0.20 Verdict: PASS The minimum use distance for the device is greater than minimum compliance distance to meet the reference level. Report No: (NIE) 55234RAN.004 Page 18 of 19 2018-12-17

DEKRA Testing and Certification, S.A.U. Parque Tecnológico de Andalucía, c/ Severo Ochoa nº 2 · 29590 Campanillas · Málaga · España C.I.F. A29 507 456 Multiple frequencies assessment When multiple sources are introduced into an environment, it becomes necessary to address the sources interdependently, since each source will contribute some percentage of the maximum exposure toward the total exposure at a fixed location. The sum of the ratios of the exposure from each source to the corresponding maximum exposure for the frequency of each source must be evaluated. The exposure complies with the maximum permissible exposure if the sum of the ratios is less than unity: n Si  <1 i 1 MPE i Where Si is the power density of each source; MPEi is the power density basic restriction of each source. The worst case of simultaneous transmission for all model variants is found for the WRD0B and WRD0J models. These models are able to transmit simultaneously using NFC and Bluetooth module BGM111. The multiple frequencies calculation will be as follow: 0.63 0.016 + = 0.315 + 0.003 = 0.318 < 1 Limit 2 5.35 Report No: (NIE) 55234RAN.004 Page 19 of 19 2018-12-17


Document Created: 2018-12-17 10:17:08
Document Modified: 2018-12-17 10:17:08
© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC