SAR Report

FCC ID: U4G004W

RF Exposure Info

Download: PDF
FCCID_1577837

DAT-P-152/98-02 Report Dosimetric Assessment of the Portable Device Datalogic ELF (FCC ID: U4G0040) According to the FCC Requirements June 22, 2011 IMST GmbH Carl-Friedrich-Gauß-Str. 2 D-47475 Kamp-Lintfort Customer 7layers AG Borsigstrasse 11 D-40880 Ratingen The test results only relate to the items tested. This report shall not be reproduced except in full without the written approval of the testing laboratory. SAR_Report_7layers_6620_852_FCC_2450_5GHz_ELF_CONFIDENTIAL_2 Page 1 of 34

SAR_Report_7layers_6620_852_FCC_2450_5GHz_ELF_CONFIDENTIAL_2 Page 2 of 34 Executive Summary The ELF is a new handheld from Datalogic operating in the 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz frequency range. The device has different integrated antennas and the system concepts used are the RFID, Bluetooth and IEEE 802.11 a/b/g standards. The objective of the measurements done by IMST was the dosimetric assessment of one device in worst case body worn position in the IEEE 802.11 a/b/g standards. The used worst case configurations are based on worst case configuration as determined in SAR report: “SAR_Report_7layers_6620_798_FCC_Body_2450_5GHz_Datalogic_CONFIDENTIAL” [IMST Report] The handheld was set in a test mode during the measurements, which allowed separate settings of frequency and data rate. The examinations have been carried out with the dosimetric assessment system „DASY4“. Based on the KDB 648474 [KDB 648474] measurements with Bluetooth are not required since the output power is below the threshold for Bluetooth. The measurements were made according to the Supplement C to OET Bulletin 65 of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Guidelines [OET 65] for evaluating compliance of mobile and portable devices with FCC limits for human exposure (general population) to radiofrequency emissions and IC RSS 102 Issue 4 and the following specific FCC Procedures: • KDB 248227 D01 SAR meas. for 802.11 abg v01r02 All measurements have been performed in accordance to the recommendations given by SPEAG. Compliance Statement For the used worst case positions, the portable device ELF from Datalogic (FCC ID: U4G0040) is in compliance with the IC RSS 102 Issue 4 [RSS 102] and Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Guidelines [OET 65] for uncontrolled exposure. SAR assessment in body worn was conducted with a distance of Dasy_Report_FCC_DECT_1900_1.1.doc/22.05.2006/CH 15 mm between the housing of the handheld and the flat phantom. Maximum SAR1g = 0.081 W/kg (IEEE 802.11 a, Channel 36, display towards the ground) prepared by: ........................................... reviewed by: .............................................. Alexander Rahn André van den Bosch test engineer quality assurance engineer

SAR_Report_7layers_6620_852_FCC_2450_5GHz_ELF_CONFIDENTIAL_2 Page 3 of 34 Table of Contents 1 SUBJECT OF INVESTIGATION .......................................................................................................... 4 2 THE IEEE STANDARD C95.1-1999 AND THE FCC EXPOSURE CRITERIA.................................... 4 2.1 DISTINCTION BETWEEN EXPOSED POPULATION, DURATION OF EXPOSURE AND FREQUENCIES ........... 5 2.2 DISTINCTION BETWEEN MAXIMUM PERMISSIBLE EXPOSURE AND SAR LIMITS .................................... 5 2.3 SAR LIMIT ..................................................................................................................................... 5 3 THE FCC MEASUREMENT PROCEDURE ......................................................................................... 6 3.1 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS .............................................................................................................. 6 3.2 PHANTOM REQUIREMENTS .............................................................................................................. 6 3.3 TEST TO BE PERFORMED ................................................................................................................ 6 3.4 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FOR 802.11 A/B/G TRANSMITTERS ........................................................... 9 4 THE MEASUREMENT SYSTEM........................................................................................................ 11 4.1 PHANTOM .................................................................................................................................... 13 4.2 PROBE ......................................................................................................................................... 13 4.3 MEASUREMENT PROCEDURE ........................................................................................................ 14 4.4 UNCERTAINTY ASSESSMENT ......................................................................................................... 15 5 OUTPUT POWER VALUES ............................................................................................................... 16 6 SAR RESULTS................................................................................................................................... 17 7 EVALUATION..................................................................................................................................... 18 8 APPENDIX.......................................................................................................................................... 19 8.1 ADMINISTRATIVE DATA.................................................................................................................. 19 8.2 DEVICE UNDER TEST AND TEST CONDITIONS ................................................................................. 19 8.3 TISSUE RECIPES .......................................................................................................................... 20 Dasy_Report_FCC_DECT_1900_1.1.doc/22.05.2006/CH 8.4 MATERIAL PARAMETERS ............................................................................................................... 21 8.5 SIMPLIFIED PERFORMANCE CHECKING .......................................................................................... 22 8.6 ENVIRONMENT..............................................................................................................................28 8.7 TEST EQUIPMENT ......................................................................................................................... 28 8.8 CERTIFICATES OF CONFORMITY .................................................................................................... 30 8.9 PICTURES OF THE DEVICE UNDER TEST ......................................................................................... 32 8.10 TEST POSITIONS FOR THE DEVICE UNDER TEST.............................................................................. 33 8.11 PICTURES TO DEMONSTRATE THE REQUIRED LIQUID DEPTH ........................................................... 33 9 REFERENCES ................................................................................................................................... 34

SAR_Report_7layers_6620_852_FCC_2450_5GHz_ELF_CONFIDENTIAL_2 Page 4 of 34 1 Subject of Investigation The ELF is a new handheld from Datalogic operating in the 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz frequency range. The device has different integrated antennas and the system concepts used are the RFID, Bluetooth and IEEE 802.11 a/b/g standards. Fig. 1: Pictures of the ELF. The objective of the measurements done by IMST was the dosimetric assessment of one device in worst case body worn position in the IEEE 802.11 a/b/g standards. The used worst case configurations are based on worst case configuration as determined in SAR report: “SAR_Report_7layers_6620_798_FCC_Body_2450_5GHz_Datalogic_CONFIDENTIAL” [IMST Report] The handheld was set in a test mode during the measurements, which allowed separate settings of frequency and data rate. The examinations have been carried out with the dosimetric assessment system „DASY4“. 2 The IEEE Standard C95.1-1999 and the FCC Exposure Criteria In the USA the FCC exposure criteria [OET 65] are based on the withdrawn IEEE Standard C95.1-1999 [IEEE C95.1-1999]. This version was replaced by the IEEE Std C95.1-2005 in October, 2005. Both IEEE standards sets limits for human exposure to radio frequency electromagnetic fields in the frequency range 3 kHz to 300 GHz. One of the major differences in the Dasy_Report_FCC_DECT_1900_1.1.doc/22.05.2006/CH newly revised C95.1 is the change in the basic restrictions for localized exposure, from 1.6 W/kg averaged over 1 g tissue to 2.0 W/kg averaged over 10 g tissue, which is now identical to the ICNIRP guidelines [ICNIRP 1998].

SAR_Report_7layers_6620_852_FCC_2450_5GHz_ELF_CONFIDENTIAL_2 Page 5 of 34 2.1 Distinction Between Exposed Population, Duration of Exposure and Frequencies The American Standard [IEEE C95.1-1999] distinguishes between controlled and uncontrolled environment. Controlled environments are locations where there is exposure that may be incurred by persons who are aware of the potential for exposure as a concomitant of employment or by other cognizant persons. Uncontrolled environments are locations where there is the exposure of individuals who have no knowledge or control of their exposure. The exposures may occur in living quarters or workplaces. For exposure in controlled environments higher field strengths are admissible. In addition the duration of exposure is considered. Due to the influence of frequency on important parameters, as the penetration depth of the electromagnetic fields into the human body and the absorption capability of different tissues, the limits in general vary with frequency. 2.2 Distinction between Maximum Permissible Exposure and SAR Limits The biological relevant parameter describing the effects of electromagnetic fields in the frequency range of interest is the specific absorption rate SAR (dimension: power/mass). It is a measure of the power absorbed per unit mass. The SAR may be spatially averaged over the total mass of an exposed body or its parts. The SAR is calculated from the r.m.s. electric field strength E inside the human body, the conductivity σ and the mass density ρ of the biological tissue: E2 ∂T SAR = σ =c . ρ ∂t t →0 + (1) The specific absorption rate describes the initial rate of temperature rise ∂ T / ∂ t as a function of the specific heat capacity c of the tissue. A limitation of the specific absorption rate prevents an excessive heating of the human body by electromagnetic energy. As it is sometimes difficult to determine the SAR directly by measurement (e.g. whole Dasy_Report_FCC_DECT_1900_1.1.doc/22.05.2006/CH body averaged SAR), the standard specifies more readily measurable maximum permissible exposures in terms of external electric E and magnetic field strength H and power density S, derived from the SAR limits. The limits for E, H and S have been fixed so that even under worst case conditions, the limits for the specific absorption rate SAR are not exceeded. For the relevant frequency range the maximum permissible exposure may be exceeded if the exposure can be shown by appropriate techniques to produce SAR values below the corresponding limits. 2.3 SAR Limit In this report the comparison between the FCC exposure limits and the measured data is made using the spatial peak SAR; the power level of the device under test guarantees that the whole body averaged SAR is not exceeded.

SAR_Report_7layers_6620_852_FCC_2450_5GHz_ELF_CONFIDENTIAL_2 Page 6 of 34 Having in mind a worst case consideration, the SAR limit is valid for uncontrolled environment and mobile respectively portable transmitters. According to Table 1 the SAR values have to be averaged over a mass of 1 g (SAR1g) with the shape of a cube. Standard Status SAR limit [W/kg] IEEE C95.1-1999 Replaced 1.6 Table 1: Relevant spatial peak SAR limit averaged over a mass of 1 g. 3 The FCC Measurement Procedure The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has published a report and order on the 1st of August 1996 [FCC 96-326], which requires routine dosimetric assessment of mobile telecommunications devices, either by laboratory measurement techniques or by computational modeling, prior to equipment authorization or use. In 2001 the Commission’s Office of Engineering and Technology has released Edition 01-01 of Supplement C to OET Bulletin 65. This revised edition, which replaces Edition 97-01, provides additional guidance and information for evaluating compliance of mobile and portable devices with FCC limits for human exposure to radiofrequency emissions [OET 65]. 3.1 General Requirements The test shall be performed in a laboratory with an environment which avoids influence on SAR measurements by ambient EM sources and any reflection from the environment itself. The ambient temperature shall be in the range of 20°C to 26°C and 30-70% humidity. 3.2 Phantom Requirements For body-worn and other configurations a flat phantom shall be used which is comprised of material with electrical properties similar to the corresponding tissues. 3.3 Test to be Performed Dasy_Report_FCC_DECT_1900_1.1.doc/22.05.2006/CH For purpose of determining test requirements, accessories may be divided into two categories: those that do not contain metallic components and those that do. For multiple accessories that do not contain metallic components, the device may be tested only with that accessory which provides the closest spacing to the body. For multiple accessories that contain metallic components, the device must be tested with each accessory that contains a unique metallic component. If multiple accessories share an identical metallic component, only the accessory that provides the closest spacing to the body must be tested. If the manufacturer provides none body-worn accessories a separation distance of 1.5 cm between the back of the device and the flat phantom is recommended. Other separation distances may be used, but they shall not exceed 2.5 cm. In these cases,

SAR_Report_7layers_6620_852_FCC_2450_5GHz_ELF_CONFIDENTIAL_2 Page 7 of 34 the device may use body-worn accessories that provide a separation distance greater than that tested for the device provided however that the accessory contains no metallic components. For devices with retractable antenna the SAR test shall be performed with the antenna fully extended and fully retracted. Other factors that may affect the exposure shall also be tested. For example, optional antennas or optional battery packs which may significantly change the volume, lengths, flip open/closed, etc. of the device, or any other accessories which might have the potential to considerably increase the peak spatial-average SAR value. The SAR test shall be performed at the high, middle and low frequency channels of each operating mode. If the SAR measured at the middle channel for each test configuration is at least 3.0 dB lower than the SAR limit, testing at the high and low channels is optional. Fig. 2: Lap-held position, bottom of the computer is touching the phantom. If the host product provides antennas within the screen antenna, the device should be measured with the screen touching the phantom Dasy_Report_FCC_DECT_1900_1.1.doc/22.05.2006/CH Fig. 3: Lap-held position, back of the screen is touching the phantom.

SAR_Report_7layers_6620_852_FCC_2450_5GHz_ELF_CONFIDENTIAL_2 Page 8 of 34 The typical measurement positions of a tablet PC are given below. For measurements of antennas which are mounted within the base of the PC, the base of the device is touching the phantom. Those antennas which are mounted within the edge of the PC were measured with the edge of the device touching the phantom. Fig. 4: Tablet PC, base and edge are touching the phantom. Fig. . 5 Test positions for body worn devices. For devices with multiple transmitters and antennas, the requirements of the KDB 648474 [KDB 648474] and / or KDB 616217 [KDB 616217] should be met. Dasy_Report_FCC_DECT_1900_1.1.doc/22.05.2006/CH

SAR_Report_7layers_6620_852_FCC_2450_5GHz_ELF_CONFIDENTIAL_2 Page 9 of 34 3.4 Additional information for 802.11 a/b/g transmitters In May 2007 the FCC published the revised issue of the SAR Measurement Procedures for 802 a/b/g transmitters to support the SAR measurements for demonstrating compliance with the FCC RF exposure guidelines. Additional information were required to establish specific device operating configurations to use during the measurements since the specific signal modulations, data rates, network conditions and other parameters were not considered within the current SAR measurement procedures (FCC, IEEE-1528). Following the most important differences compared to the common SAR measurements of e.g. mobile phones working in the GSM or PCS standards were listed: ƒ Using of chipset based test mode software to ensure consistent and reliable results ƒ If the device supports switched diversity, the SAR should be measured with only one antenna transmitting (with fixed modulation and data rate) at a time ƒ The SAR is measured for the “default test channels” listed below as given by the FCC ƒ SAR measurements for 802.11 g channels when the maximum avg output power is less than ≥ 0.25 dB higher than the values for the corresponding 802.11b channels ƒ The avg. output power for 802.11a should be measured on all channels in each frequency band ƒ If the channel with the maximum avg. output power is not included in the default test channels, this channel should be tested instead of an adjacent default test channel ƒ For multiple channel bandwidth configurations, the configuration with the highest output power limit should be tested. ƒ Each channel should be tested at the lowest data rate in each a/b/g mode ƒ When the extrapolated maximum peak SAR for the maximum output channel is ≤ Dasy_Report_FCC_DECT_1900_1.1.doc/22.05.2006/CH 1.6 W/kg and the 1g avg SAR is ≤ 0.8 W/kg, testing of other channels in the default test channel configuration is optional. ƒ If the device supports MIMO capability and the antennas are in close proximity to each other (within 3 cm – 5 cm), it is necessary to summarize the SAR1g values of the antennas. ƒ If the peak SAR locations from different antennas are more than 5 cm apart, spatial summing is optional. ƒ Each channel should be tested at the lowest data rate in each a-b/g mode.

SAR_Report_7layers_6620_852_FCC_2450_5GHz_ELF_CONFIDENTIAL_2 Page 10 of 34 Default Test Channels Mode Frequency Turbo Channel § 15.247 802.11 [MHz] Channel UNII b g 2412 1° x ^ b/g 2437 6 6 x ^ 2462 11° x ^ 5180 36 x 5200 40 42 * 5220 44 (5.21 GHz) * 5240 48 50 x 5260 52 (5.29 GHz) x 5280 56 58 * 5300 60 (5.29 GHz) * 5320 64 x 5500 100 * UNII 5520 104 x 5540 108 * 5560 112 * a 5580 116 x 5600 120 Unknown * 5620 124 x 5640 128 * 5660 132 * 5680 136 x 5700 140 * 5745 149 x x UNII or 5765 153 152 (5.76 GHz) * * §15.247 5785 157 x * 5805 161 160 (5.80 GHz) * x Dasy_Report_FCC_DECT_1900_1.1.doc/22.05.2006/CH §15.247 5825 165 x Table 2: Default Test channels given by the FCC. X: default test channels *: possible 802.11a channels with maximum avg output > the default test channels ^: possible 802.11g channels with maximum avg output ¼ dB ≥ the default test channels °: when output power is reduced for channel 1 and / or 11 to meet restricted band requirements the highest output channels closet to each of these channels should be tested

SAR_Report_7layers_6620_852_FCC_2450_5GHz_ELF_CONFIDENTIAL_2 Page 11 of 34 4 The Measurement System DASY is an abbreviation of „Dosimetric Assessment System“ and describes a system that is able to determine the SAR distribution inside a phantom of a human being according to different standards. The DASY4 system consists of the following items as shown in Fig: 6. Additional Fig: 7 shows the equipment, similar to the installations in other laboratories. • Fully compliant with all current measurement standards as stated in Fig. 13 • High precision robot with controller • Measurement server (for surveillance of the robot operation and signal filtering) • Data acquisition electronics DAE (for signal amplification and filtering) • Field probes calibrated for use in liquids • Electro-optical converter EOC (conversion from the optical into a digital signal) • Light beam (improving of the absolute probe positioning accuracy) • Two SAM phantoms filled with tissue simulating liquid • DASY4 software • SEMCAD Dasy_Report_FCC_DECT_1900_1.1.doc/22.05.2006/CH Fig. 6: The DASY4 measurement system.

SAR_Report_7layers_6620_852_FCC_2450_5GHz_ELF_CONFIDENTIAL_2 Page 12 of 34 Fig. 7: The measurement set-up with two SAM phantoms containing tissue simulating liquid. The mobile phone operating at the maximum power level is placed by a non metallic device holder (delivered from Schmid & Partner) in the above described positions at a shell phantom of a human being. The distribution of the electric field strength E is measured in the tissue simulating liquid within the shell phantom. For this miniaturised field probes with high sensitivity and low field disturbance are used. Afterwards the corresponding SAR values are calculated with the known electrical conductivity σ and the mass density ρ of the tissue in the SEMCAD FDTD software. The software is able to determine the averaged SAR values (averaging region 1 g or 10 g) for compliance testing. Dasy_Report_FCC_DECT_1900_1.1.doc/22.05.2006/CH The measurements are done by two scans: first a coarse scan determines the region of the maximum SAR, afterwards the averaged SAR is measured in a second scan within the shape of a cube. The measurement time takes about 20 minutes.

SAR_Report_7layers_6620_852_FCC_2450_5GHz_ELF_CONFIDENTIAL_2 Page 13 of 34 4.1 Phantom For the measurements the Specific Anthropomorphic Mannequin (SAM Twin Phantom V4.0) defined by the IEEE SCC-34/SC2 group and delivered by Schmid & Partner Engineering AG is used. The phantom is a fibreglass shell integrated in a wooden table. The thickness of the phantom amounts to 2 mm ± 0.2 mm. It enables the dosimetric evaluation of left and right hand phone usage and includes an additional flat phantom part for the system performance check and body worn measurements. The phantom set-up includes a coverage (polyethylene), which prevents the evaporation of the liquid. The details and the Certificate of conformity can be found in Fig. 14. 4.2 Probe For the measurements the Dosimetric E-Field Probes ET3DV6 or EX3DV4 with following specifications are used. They are manufactured and calibrated in accordance with FCC [OET 65] and IEEE [IEEE 1528-2003] recommendations annually by Schmid & Partner Engineering AG. ET3DV6: • Dynamic range: 5μW/g to > 100mW/g • Tip diameter: 6.8 mm • Probe linearity: ± 0.2 dB (30 MHz to 3 GHz) • Axial isotropy: ± 0.2 dB • Spherical isotropy: ± 0.4 dB • Distance from probe tip to dipole centers: 2.7 mm • Calibration range: 900MHz / 1850MHz for head and body simulating liquid • Angle between probe axis (evaluation axis) and surface normal line: less than 30° EX3DV4: • Dynamic range: 10μW/g to > 100mW/g (noise typically < 1μW/g) Dasy_Report_FCC_DECT_1900_1.1.doc/22.05.2006/CH • Tip diameter: 2.5 mm • Probe linearity: ± 0.2 dB (30 MHz to 6 GHz) • Axial isotropy: ± 0.2 dB • Spherical isotropy: ± 0.4 dB • Distance from probe tip to dipole centers: 1.0 mm • Calibration range: 1950 MHz / 2450MHz / 3500 MHz / 5200 MHz / 5500 MHz / 5800 MHz for head and body simulating liquid • Angle between probe axis (evaluation axis) and surface normal line: less than 30°

SAR_Report_7layers_6620_852_FCC_2450_5GHz_ELF_CONFIDENTIAL_2 Page 14 of 34 4.3 Measurement Procedure The following steps are used for each test position: • Establish a call with the maximum output power with a base station simulator. The connection between the mobile phone and the base station simulator is established via air interface. • Measurement of the local E-field value at a fixed location (P1). This value serves as a reference value for calculating a possible power drift. • Measurement of the SAR distribution with a grid spacing of 15 mm x 15 mm and a constant distance to the inner surface of the phantom. Since the sensors can not directly measure at the inner phantom surface, the values between the sensors and the inner phantom surface are extrapolated. With this values the area of the maximum SAR is calculated by a interpolation scheme (combination of a least-square fitted function and a weighted average method). Additional all peaks within 2 dB of the maximum SAR are searched. • Around this points, a cube of 30 mm x 30 mm x 30 mm is assessed by measuring 7 x 7 x 7 points whereby the first two measurement points are within the required 10 mm of the surface. With these data, the peak spatial-average SAR value can be calculated within the SEMCAD software. • The used extrapolation and interpolation routines are all based on the modified Quadratic Shepard´s method [DASY4]. • Repetition of the E-field measurement at the fixed location (P1) and repetition of the whole procedure if the two results differ by more than ± 0.21dB. Dasy_Report_FCC_DECT_1900_1.1.doc/22.05.2006/CH

SAR_Report_7layers_6620_852_FCC_2450_5GHz_ELF_CONFIDENTIAL_2 Page 15 of 34 4.4 Uncertainty Assessment Table 3 includes the worst case uncertainty budget suggested by the [IEEE 1528-2003] and determined by Schmid & Partner Engineering AG. The expanded uncertainty (K=2) is assessed to be ± 21.7% and is valid up to 3.0 GHz. Uncertainty Probability Standard vi² or Error Sources Divisor ci Value Distribution Uncertainty veff Measurement System Probe calibration ± 5.9 % Normal 1 1 ± 5.9 % ∞ Axial isotropy ± 4.7 % Rectangular √3 0.7 ± 1.9 % ∞ Hemispherical isotropy ± 9.6 % Rectangular √3 0.7 ± 3.9 % ∞ Boundary effects ± 1.0 % Rectangular √3 1 ± 0.6 % ∞ Linearity ± 4.7 % Rectangular √3 1 ± 2.7 % ∞ System detection limit ± 1.0 % Rectangular √3 1 ± 0.6 % ∞ Readout electronics ± 1.0 % Normal 1 1 ± 1.0 % ∞ Response time ± 0.8 % Rectangular √3 1 ± 0.5 % ∞ Integration time ± 2.6% Rectangular √3 1 ± 1.5 % ∞ RF ambient conditions ± 3.0 % Rectangular √3 1 ± 1.7 % ∞ Probe positioner ± 0.4 % Rectangular √3 1 ± 0.2 % ∞ Probe positioning ± 2.9 % Rectangular √3 1 ± 1.7 % ∞ Algorithm for max SAR ∞ ± 1.0 % Rectangular √3 1 ± 0.6 % eval. Test Sample Related Device positioning ± 2.9 % Normal 1 1 ± 2.9 % 145 Device holder ± 3.6 % Normal 1 1 ± 3.6 % 5 Power drift ± 5.0 % Rectangular √3 1 ± 2.9 % ∞ Dasy_Report_FCC_DECT_1900_1.1.doc/22.05.2006/CH Phantom and Set-up Phantom uncertainty ± 4.0 % Rectangular √3 1 ± 2.3 % ∞ Liquid conductivity (target) ± 5.0 % Rectangular √3 0.64 ± 1.8 % ∞ Liquid conductivity (meas.) ± 2.5 % Normal 1 0.64 ± 1.6 % ∞ Liquid permittivity (target) ± 5.0 % Rectangular √3 0.6 ± 1.7 % ∞ Liquid permittivity (meas.) ± 2.5 % Normal 1 0.6 ± 1.5 % ∞ Combined Uncertainty ± 10.8 % Table 3: Uncertainty budget of DASY4.

SAR_Report_7layers_6620_852_FCC_2450_5GHz_ELF_CONFIDENTIAL_2 Page 16 of 34 5 Output Power Values Frequency Mode Channel Data Rate Output Power [dBm] [MHz] 2.45 GHz Range 1 2412 802.11 b 6 2437 1 Mbps 16.4 11 2462 1 2412 802.11 g 6 2437 6 Mbps 20.5 11 2462 36 5180 10.6 40 5200 5.2 GHz Range 44 5220 48 5240 52 5260 56 5280 60 5300 64 5320 100 5500 104 5520 108 5540 112 5560 5.5 GHz Range 802.11 a 6 Mbps 116 5580 120 5600 124 5620 8.7 128 5640 132 5660 136 5680 Dasy_Report_FCC_DECT_1900_1.1.doc/22.05.2006/CH 140 5700 149 5745 153 5765 5.8 GHz Range 157 5785 161 5805 9.1 165 5825 Table 4: Maximum output power values for IEEE 802.11 a/b/g for the used Datalogic ELF

SAR_Report_7layers_6620_852_FCC_2450_5GHz_ELF_CONFIDENTIAL_2 Page 17 of 34 6 SAR Results With special test software it was possible to conduct the tests with specific output power and channel. The tables below contain the measured SAR values averaged over a mass of 1 g. The used worst case configurations are based on worst case configuration as determined in SAR report: “SAR_Report_7layers_6620_798_FCC_Body_2450_5GHz_Datalogic_CONFIDENTIAL [IMST Report] SAR1g [W/kg] (Drift[dB]) Temperature Test Position (Liquid depth 16.8 cm) CH 1 CH 6 CH 11 Ambient Liquid 2412 MHz 2437 MHz 2462 MHz [° C] [° C] Display towards the 0.030 21.9 21.5 ground, 15 mm distance (0.121) Table 5: Measurement results for IEEE 802.11 g in body worn worst case configuration for the Datalogic ELF. SAR1g [W/kg] (Drift[dB]) Temperature Test Position (Liquid depth 15.5 cm) CH 36 CH 48 CH 52 CH 64 Ambient Liquid 5180 MHz 5240 MHz 5260 MHz 5320 MHz [° C] [° C] Display towards the 0.081 22.0 21.7 ground, 15 mm distance (0.115) Table 6: Measurement results for IEEE 802.11 a (5200 MHz range) in body worn worst case configuration for the Datalogic ELF. SAR1g [W/kg] (Drift[dB]) Temperature Test Position (Liquid depth 15.5 cm) CH 104 CH 116 CH 124 CH 136 Ambient Liquid 5520 MHz 5580 MHz 5620 MHz 5680 MHz [° C] [° C] Dasy_Report_FCC_DECT_1900_1.1.doc/22.05.2006/CH Display towards the 0.055 22.0 21.7 ground, 15 mm distance (0.018) Table 7: Measurement results for IEEE 802.11 a (5500 MHz range) in body worn worst case configuration for the Datalogic ELF.

SAR_Report_7layers_6620_852_FCC_2450_5GHz_ELF_CONFIDENTIAL_2 Page 18 of 34 SAR1g [W/kg] (Drift[dB]) Temperature Test Position (Liquid depth 15.5 cm) CH 149 CH 161 Ambient Liquid 5745 MHz 5805 MHz [° C] [° C] Display towards the 0.032 22.0 21.7 ground, 15 mm distance (0.054) Table 8: Measurement results for IEEE 802.11 a (5800 MHz range) in body worn worst case configuration for the Datalogic ELF. To control the output power stability during the SAR test the used DASY4 system calculates the power drift by measuring the e-field at the same location at the beginning and at the end of the measurement for each test position. These drift values can be found in the above tables labeled as: (Drift[dB]). This ensures that the power drift during one measurement is within 5%. 7 Evaluation In figure 8 the SAR results for IEEE 802.11 a/g standards given in table 5 - 8 are summarized and compared to the limit. CH 6 CH 36 CH 124 CH 161 2,5 2 FCC Guideline SAR 1g [W/kg] 1,5 1 Dasy_Report_FCC_DECT_1900_1.1.doc/22.05.2006/CH 0,5 0 Worst Case Body Worn Configuration Fig. 8: The measured body SAR values for the Datalogic ELF, for IEEE 802.11 a/g in worst case body worn configuration, in comparison to the FCC exposure limit.

SAR_Report_7layers_6620_852_FCC_2450_5GHz_ELF_CONFIDENTIAL_2 Page 19 of 34 8 Appendix 8.1 Administrative Data Date of validation: 2450 MHz: June 21, 2011 5200 MHz: June 21, 2011 5500 MHz: June 21, 2011 5800 MHz: June 21, 2011 Date of measurement: June 21, 2011 Data stored: 7layers_6620_852 Contact: IMST GmbH Carl-Friedrich-Gauß-Str. 2 D-47475 Kamp-Lintfort, Germany Tel.: +49- 2842-981 378 Fax: +49- 2842-981 399 email: vandenBosch@imst.de 8.2 Device under Test and Test Conditions MTE: Datalogic ELF Date of receipt: June 14, 2011 SN: D11D03297 FCC ID: U4G0040 Equipment class: Portable device Power Class: IEEE 802.11 a/g (max output power) RF exposure environment: General Population/ Uncontrolled Power supply: internal battery Antenna: integrated Measured Standards: IEEE 802.11 g: data rate: 6 Mbps; IEEE 802.11 a: data rate: 6 Mbps; Method to establish a call: IEEE 802.11 a/g: test Mode Modulation: IEEE 802.11a/g: OFDM, DSSS; Used Phantom: SAM Twin Phantom V4.0, as defined by the IEEE SCC-34/SC2 group and delivered by Schmid & Dasy_Report_FCC_DECT_1900_1.1.doc/22.05.2006/CH Partner Engineering AG

SAR_Report_7layers_6620_852_FCC_2450_5GHz_ELF_CONFIDENTIAL_2 Page 20 of 34 Datalogic Used Used Channels TX Range [MHz] RX Range [MHz] Crest ELF [low, middle, high] Factor IEEE 802.11 g 2412.0 – 2462.0 2412.0 – 2462.0 6 1 IEEE 802.11 a 5180.0 – 5320.0 5180.0 – 5320.0 36 1 IEEE 802.11 a 5520.0 – 5680.0 5520.0 – 5680.0 124 1 IEEE 802.11 a 5745.0 - 5805.0 5745.0 - 5805.0 161 1 Table 9: Used channels and crest factors during the test. 8.3 Tissue Recipes The following recipes are provided in percentage by weight. 2450 MHz. Body: 31.40% Diethylenglykol-monobutylether 68.60% De-Ionized Water The tissue simulating liquids for the frequency range from 3.5 GHz up to 5.8 GHz were delivered by SPEAG, therefore the detailed compositions are not available and only the included ingredients were listed and shown in Figure 13. 3500 MHz – 5800 MHz, Head / Body: 11.0 % - 36 % Mineral Oil 0.5 % - 15 % Emulsifiers 60.0 % - 78 % Water 0.4 % - 3.0 % Additives and salt Dasy_Report_FCC_DECT_1900_1.1.doc/22.05.2006/CH

SAR_Report_7layers_6620_852_FCC_2450_5GHz_ELF_CONFIDENTIAL_2 Page 21 of 34 8.4 Material Parameters For the measurement of the following parameters the HP 85070B dielectric probe kit is used, representing the open-ended coaxial probe measurement procedure. The measured values should be within ± 5% of the recommended values given by the FCC. Frequency εr σ [S/m] 2450 MHz Body. Recommended Value 52.70 ± 2.63 1.95 ± 0.09 (IEEE 802.11 b/g) Measured Value (Ch. 6) 52.50 2.01 5200 MHz Body Recommended Value (5200 MHz) 49.00 ± 2.40 5.30 ± 0.26 (IEEE 802.11 a) Measured Value, 5180 MHz (Ch. 36) 48.80 5.22 5500 MHz Body Recommended Value (5500 MHz) 48.60 ± 2.40 5.65 ± 0.28 (IEEE 802.11 a) Measured Value, 5620 MHz (Ch. 124) 47.90 5.88 5800MHz Body Recommended Value (5800 MHz) 48.20 ± 2.40 6.00 ± 0.30 (IEEE 802.11 a) Measured Value, 5805 MHz (Ch. 161) 47.50 6.18 Table 10: Parameters of the tissue simulating liquid. Dasy_Report_FCC_DECT_1900_1.1.doc/22.05.2006/CH

SAR_Report_7layers_6620_852_FCC_2450_5GHz_ELF_CONFIDENTIAL_2 Page 22 of 34 8.5 Simplified Performance Checking The simplified performance check was realized using the dipole validation kits. The input power of the dipole antennas were 250 mW and they were placed under the flat part of the SAM phantoms. The target and measured results are listed in the table 11 - 12 and shown in figure 9 - 12. The target values were adopted from the calibration certificates. Available Dipoles SAR1g [W/kg] εr σ [S/m] D2450MHz, SN #709 13.20 51.70 2.00 D5200 MHz, SN #1028 Target 20.10 47.30 5.38 D5500 MHz, SN #1028 Values Body 21.20 46.80 5.84 D5800 MHz, SN #1028 19.10 46.10 6.29 Table 11: Dipole target results. Used Dipoles SAR1g [W/kg] εr σ [S/m] 2450 MHz, SN: 709 14.00 52.30 2.02 (Validation 802.11 b/g) 5200 MHz, SN: 1028 20.90 48.80 5.24 (Validation 802.11 a) Measured 5500 MHz, SN: 1028 Values Body 20.50 48.20 5.57 (Validation 802.11 a) 5800 MHz, SN: 1028 19.20 47.50 6.17 (Validation 802.11 a) Table 12: Measured dipole validation results. Dasy_Report_FCC_DECT_1900_1.1.doc/22.05.2006/CH

SAR_Report_7layers_6620_852_FCC_2450_5GHz_ELF_CONFIDENTIAL_2 Page 23 of 34 Test Laboratory: Imst GmbH, DASY Yellow (II); File Name: 210611_y_3536_2450.da4 DUT: Dipole 2450 MHz SN: 709; Type: D2450V2; Serial: D2450V2 - SN:709 Program Name: System Performance Check at 2450 MHz Communication System: CW; Frequency: 2450 MHz;Duty Cycle: 1:1 Medium parameters used: f = 2450 MHz; σ = 2.02 mho/m; εr = 52.3; ρ = 1000 kg/m3 Phantom section: Flat Section DASY4 Configuration: - Probe: EX3DV4 - SN3536; ConvF(7.39, 7.39, 7.39); Calibrated: 19.09.2008 - Sensor-Surface: 4mm (Mechanical Surface Detection) - Electronics: DAE4 Sn631; Calibrated: 17.09.2010 - Phantom: SAM Glycol 1340; Type: QD 000 P40 CB; Serial: TP-1340 - Measurement SW: DASY4, V4.7 Build 80; Postprocessing SW: SEMCAD, V1.8 Build 186 d=10mm, Pin=250mW/Area Scan (7x7x1): Measurement grid: dx=10mm, dy=10mm Maximum value of SAR (measured) = 16.0 mW/g d=10mm, Pin=250mW/Zoom Scan (7x7x7)/Cube 0: Measurement grid: dx=5mm, dy=5mm, dz=5mm Reference Value = 88.8 V/m; Power Drift = 0.030 dB Peak SAR (extrapolated) = 29.1 W/kg SAR(1 g) = 14 mW/g; SAR(10 g) = 6.39 mW/g Maximum value of SAR (measured) = 15.8 mW/g Dasy_Report_FCC_DECT_1900_1.1.doc/22.05.2006/CH Fig. 9: Validation measurement 2450 MHz Body (June 21, 2011) coarse grid. Ambient Temperature: 21.9°C. Liquid Temperature: 21.5°C.

SAR_Report_7layers_6620_852_FCC_2450_5GHz_ELF_CONFIDENTIAL_2 Page 24 of 34 Test Laboratory: IMST GmbH, DASY Blue (I); File Name: 210611_b_3536_5200.da4 DUT: Dipole 5GHz SN: 1028; Type: D5GHzV2; Serial: D5GHzV2 - SN:1028 Program Name: System Performance Check at 5200 MHz Communication System: CW; Frequency: 5200 MHz;Duty Cycle: 1:1 Medium parameters used: f = 5200 MHz; σ = 5.24 mho/m; εr = 48.8; ρ = 1000 kg/m3 Phantom section: Flat Section DASY4 Configuration: - Probe: EX3DV4 - SN3536; ConvF(4.36, 4.36, 4.36); Calibrated: 16.09.2010 - Sensor-Surface: 2mm (Mechanical Surface Detection) - Electronics: DAE4 Sn631; Calibrated: 17.09.2010 - Phantom: SAM Glycol 1176; Type: Speag; Serial: 1176 - Measurement SW: DASY4, V4.7 Build 80; Postprocessing SW: SEMCAD, V1.8 Build 186 d=10mm, Pin=250mW/Area Scan (14x14x1): Measurement grid: dx=7.5mm, dy=7.5mm Maximum value of SAR (measured) = 35.1 mW/g d=10mm, Pin=250mW/Zoom Scan (8x8x8)/Cube 0: Measurement grid: dx=4.3mm, dy=4.3mm, dz=3mm Reference Value = 91.2 V/m; Power Drift = 0.064 dB Peak SAR (extrapolated) = 72.3 W/kg SAR(1 g) = 20.9 mW/g; SAR(10 g) = 5.91 mW/g Maximum value of SAR (measured) = 39.2 mW/g Dasy_Report_FCC_DECT_1900_1.1.doc/22.05.2006/CH Fig. 10: Validation measurement 5200 MHz Body (June 21, 2011) coarse grid. Ambient Temperature: 21.9°C. Liquid Temperature: 21.7°C.

SAR_Report_7layers_6620_852_FCC_2450_5GHz_ELF_CONFIDENTIAL_2 Page 25 of 34 Test Laboratory: IMST GmbH, DASY Blue (I); File Name: 210611_b_3536_5500.da4 DUT: Dipole 5GHz SN: 1028; Type: D5GHzV2; Serial: D5GHzV2 - SN:1028 Program Name: System Performance Check at 5500 MHz Communication System: CW; Frequency: 5500 MHz;Duty Cycle: 1:1 Medium parameters used: f = 5500 MHz; σ = 5.57 mho/m; εr = 48.2; ρ = 1000 kg/m3 Phantom section: Flat Section DASY4 Configuration: - Probe: EX3DV4 - SN3536; ConvF(3.9, 3.9, 3.9); Calibrated: 16.09.2010 - Sensor-Surface: 2mm (Mechanical Surface Detection) - Electronics: DAE4 Sn631; Calibrated: 17.09.2010 - Phantom: SAM Glycol 1176; Type: Speag; Serial: 1176 - Measurement SW: DASY4, V4.7 Build 80; Postprocessing SW: SEMCAD, V1.8 Build 186 d=10mm, Pin=250mW/Area Scan (14x14x1): Measurement grid: dx=7.5mm, dy=7.5mm Maximum value of SAR (measured) = 34.9 mW/g d=10mm, Pin=250mW/Zoom Scan (8x8x8)/Cube 0: Measurement grid: dx=4.3mm, dy=4.3mm, dz=3mm Reference Value = 91.0 V/m; Power Drift = 0.073 dB Peak SAR (extrapolated) = 71.7 W/kg SAR(1 g) = 20.5 mW/g; SAR(10 g) = 5.73 mW/g Maximum value of SAR (measured) = 39.3 mW/g Dasy_Report_FCC_DECT_1900_1.1.doc/22.05.2006/CH Fig. 11: Validation measurement 5500 MHz Body (June 21, 2011) coarse grid. Ambient Temperature: 22.0°C. Liquid Temperature: 21.7°C.

SAR_Report_7layers_6620_852_FCC_2450_5GHz_ELF_CONFIDENTIAL_2 Page 26 of 34 Test Laboratory: IMST GmbH, DASY Blue (I); File Name: 210611_b_3536_5800.da4 DUT: Dipole 5GHz SN: 1028; Type: D5GHzV2; Serial: D5GHzV2 - SN:1028 Program Name: System Performance Check at 5800 MHz Communication System: CW; Frequency: 5800 MHz;Duty Cycle: 1:1 Medium parameters used: f = 5800 MHz; σ = 6.17 mho/m; εr = 47.5; ρ = 1000 kg/m3 Phantom section: Flat Section DASY4 Configuration: - Probe: EX3DV4 - SN3536; ConvF(4.1, 4.1, 4.1); Calibrated: 16.09.2010 - Sensor-Surface: 2mm (Mechanical Surface Detection) - Electronics: DAE4 Sn631; Calibrated: 17.09.2010 - Phantom: SAM Glycol 1176; Type: Speag; Serial: 1176 - Measurement SW: DASY4, V4.7 Build 80; Postprocessing SW: SEMCAD, V1.8 Build 186 d=10mm, Pin=250mW/Area Scan (14x14x1): Measurement grid: dx=7.5mm, dy=7.5mm Maximum value of SAR (measured) = 32.5 mW/g d=10mm, Pin=250mW/Zoom Scan (8x8x8)/Cube 0: Measurement grid: dx=4.3mm, dy=4.3mm, dz=3mm Reference Value = 83.0 V/m; Power Drift = 0.090 dB Peak SAR (extrapolated) = 72.9 W/kg SAR(1 g) = 19.2 mW/g; SAR(10 g) = 5.4 mW/g Maximum value of SAR (measured) = 36.9 mW/g Dasy_Report_FCC_DECT_1900_1.1.doc/22.05.2006/CH Fig. 12: Validation measurement 5800 MHz Body (June 21, 2011) coarse grid. Ambient Temperature: 21.9°C. Liquid Temperature: 21.7°C.

SAR_Report_7layers_6620_852_FCC_2450_5GHz_ELF_CONFIDENTIAL_2 Page 27 of 34 vi² Uncertainty Probability Standard Error Sources Divisor ci or Value Distribution Uncertainty veff Measurement System Probe calibration ± 4.8 % Normal 1 1 ± 4.8 % ∞ Axial isotropy ± 4.7 % Rectangular √3 1 ± 2.7 % ∞ Hemispherical isotropy ±0% Rectangular √3 1 ±0% ∞ Boundary effects ± 1.0 % Rectangular √3 1 ± 0.6 % ∞ Linearity ± 4.7 % Rectangular √3 1 ± 2.7 % ∞ System detection limit ± 1.0 % Rectangular √3 1 ± 0.6 % ∞ Readout electronics ± 1.0 % Normal 1 1 ± 1.0 % ∞ Response time ±0% Rectangular √3 1 ±0% ∞ Integration time ± 0% Rectangular √3 1 ±0% ∞ RF ambient conditions ± 3.0 % Rectangular √3 1 ± 1.7 % ∞ Probe positioner ± 0.4 % Rectangular √3 1 ± 0.2 % ∞ Probe positioning ± 2.9 % Rectangular √3 1 ± 1.7 % ∞ Algorithms for max SAR ∞ ± 1.0 % Rectangular √3 1 ± 0.6 % eval. Dipole Dipole Axis to Liquid ± 2.0 % Rectangular 1 1 ± 1.2 % ∞ Distance Input power and SAR drift ± 4.7 % Rectangular √3 1 ± 2.7 % ∞ mea. Phantom and Set-up Phantom uncertainty ± 4.0 % Rectangular √3 1 ± 2.3 % ∞ Dasy_Report_FCC_DECT_1900_1.1.doc/22.05.2006/CH Liquid conductivity (target) ± 5.0 % Rectangular √3 0.64 ± 1.8 % ∞ Liquid conductivity (meas.) ± 2.5 % Normal 1 0.64 ± 1.6 % ∞ Liquid permittivity (target) ± 5.0 % Rectangular √3 0.6 ± 1.7 % ∞ Liquid permittivity (meas.) ± 2.5 % Normal 1 0.6 ± 1.5 % ∞ Combined Uncertainty ± 8.4 % Table 13: Uncertainty budget for the system performance check.

SAR_Report_7layers_6620_852_FCC_2450_5GHz_ELF_CONFIDENTIAL_2 Page 28 of 34 8.6 Environment To comply with the required noise level (less than 12 mW/kg) periodically measurements without a DUT were conducted. Humidity: 40% ± 5 % 8.7 Test Equipment Last Next Test Equipment Model Serial Number Calibration Calibration DASY4 Systems Software Versions DASY4 V4.7 N/A N/A N/A Software Versions SEMCAD V1.8 N/A N/A N/A Dosimetric E-Field Probe EX3DV4 3536 09/2010 09/2011 Data Acquisition Electronics DAE 4 631 09/2010 09/2011 Phantom SAM 1059 N/A N/A Phantom SAM 1176 N/A N/A Phantom SAM 1340 N/A N/A Phantom SAM 1341 N/A N/A Dipoles Validation Dipole D2450V2 709 12/2009 12/2011 Validation Dipole D5GHzV2 1028 04/2010 04/2012 Material Measurement Network Analyzer E5071C MY46103220 08/2009 08/2011 Dielectric Probe Kit HP85070B US33020263 N/A N/A Table 14: SAR equipment. Dasy_Report_FCC_DECT_1900_1.1.doc/22.05.2006/CH

SAR_Report_7layers_6620_852_FCC_2450_5GHz_ELF_CONFIDENTIAL_2 Page 29 of 34 Last Next Test Equipment Model Serial Number Calibration Calibration Power Meters Power Meter, Agilent E4416A GB41050414 12/2010 12/2012 Power Meter, Agilent E4417A GB41050441 12/2010 12/2012 Power Meter, Anritsu ML2487A 6K00002319 02/2010 02/2012 Power Meter, Anritsu ML2488A 6K00002078 02/2010 02/2012 Power Sensors Power Sensor, Agilent E9301H US40010212 12/2010 12/2012 Power Sensor, Agilent E9301A MY41495584 12/2010 12/2012 Power Sensor, Anritsu MA2481B 031600 02/2010 02/2012 Power Sensor, Anritsu MA2490A 031565 02/2010 02/2012 RF Sources Network Analyzer E5071C MY46103220 08/2009 08/2011 Rohde & Schwarz SME300 100142 N/A N/A Amplifiers Mini Circuits ZHL-42 D012296 N/A N/A Mini Circuits ZHL-42 D031104#01 N/A N/A Mini Circuits ZVE-8G D031004 N/A N/A Radio Tester Rohde & Schwarz CMU200 835305/050 N/A N/A Table 15: Test equipment, General. Dasy_Report_FCC_DECT_1900_1.1.doc/22.05.2006/CH

SAR_Report_7layers_6620_852_FCC_2450_5GHz_ELF_CONFIDENTIAL_2 Page 30 of 34 8.8 Certificates of Conformity Dasy_Report_FCC_DECT_1900_1.1.doc/22.05.2006/CH Fig. 13: Certificate of conformity for the used DASY4 system

SAR_Report_7layers_6620_852_FCC_2450_5GHz_ELF_CONFIDENTIAL_2 Page 31 of 34 Dasy_Report_FCC_DECT_1900_1.1.doc/22.05.2006/CH Fig. 14: Certificate of conformity for the used SAM phantom.

SAR_Report_7layers_6620_852_FCC_2450_5GHz_ELF_CONFIDENTIAL_2 Page 32 of 34 8.9 Pictures of the Device under Test Figure 15 - 16 show the device under test. Fig. 15: Front and back view of the test device Datalogic ELF. Fig. 16: Side view of the test device Datalogic ELF. Dasy_Report_FCC_DECT_1900_1.1.doc/22.05.2006/CH

SAR_Report_7layers_6620_852_FCC_2450_5GHz_ELF_CONFIDENTIAL_2 Page 33 of 34 8.10 Test Positions for the Device under Test Figure 17 shows the test position for the SAR measurements. Fig. 17: Body worn configuration, display towards the ground, 15 mm distance. 8.11 Pictures to Demonstrate the Required Liquid Depth Figure 18 - 19 show the liquid depth in the used SAM phantom. Dasy_Report_FCC_DECT_1900_1.1.doc/22.05.2006/CH Fig. 18: Liquid depth for Fig. 19: Liquid depth for IEEE 802.11 g Body IEEE 802.11 a Body measurements measurements

SAR_Report_7layers_6620_852_FCC_2450_5GHz_ELF_CONFIDENTIAL_2 Page 34 of 34 9 References [OET 65] Federal Communications Commission: Evaluating Compliance with FCC Guidelines for Human Exposure to Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields, Supplement C (Edition 01-01) to OET Bulletin 65 (Edition 97-01), FCC, 2001. [IC RSS 102] Industry Canada, Radio Standards Specification, Radio Frequency (RF) Exposure Compliance of Radiocommunication Apparatus (All Frequency Bands); RSS-102 Issue 4 March 2010 [IEEE C95.1-1999] IEEE Std C95.1-1999: IEEE Standard for Safety Levels with Respect to Human Exposure to Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields, 3 kHz to 300 GHz, Inst. of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc., 1999. [IEEE C95.1-2005] IEEE Std C95.1-2005: IEEE Standard for Safety Levels with Respect to Human Exposure to Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields, 3 kHz to 300 GHz, Inst. of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc., 2005. [ICNIRP 1998] ICNIRP: Guidelines for Limiting Exposure to Time-varying Electric, Magnetic, and Electromagnetic Fields (up to 300 GHz), In: Health Physics, Vol. 74, No. 4, 494-522, 1998. [IEEE 1528-2003] IEEE Std 1528-2003: IEEE Recommended Practice for Determining the Peak Spatial-Average Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) in the Human Head from Wireless Communications Devices: Measurement Techniques. 1528-2003, December 19, 2003, The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers. [NIST 1994] NIST: Guidelines for Evaluating and Expressing the Uncertainty of NIST Measurement Results, Technical Note 1297 (TN1297), United States Department of Commerce Technology Administration, National Institute of Standards and Technology, 1994. [DASY4] Schmid & Partner Engineering AG: DASY4 Manual. April 2008 [FCC 96-326] FCC 96-326, ET Docket No. 93-62, Report and Order, August 1, 1996 Dasy_Report_FCC_DECT_1900_1.1.doc/22.05.2006/CH [IMST Report] SAR_Report_7layers_6620_798_FCC_Body_2450_5GHz_ Datalogic_CONFIDENTIAL”


Document Created: 2011-11-09 15:27:46
Document Modified: 2011-11-09 15:27:46
© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC