Test Report

FCC ID: TV7WAPR2ND

Test Report

Download: PDF
FCCID_3498802

Page 1 of 18 FCC Test Report Report No.: AGC07428170301FE01 FCC ID : TV7WAPR2ND APPLICATION PURPOSE : Original Equipment PRODUCT DESIGNATION : RouterBOARD wAP R-2nD BRAND NAME : RouterBOARD MODEL NAME : wAP R, RBwAPR-2nD CLIENT : Mikrotikls SIA DATE OF ISSUE : June 29, 2017 STANDARD(S) : FCC Part 15 Rules : REPORT VERSION V1.0 Attestation of Global Compliance (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd CAUTION: This report shall not be reproduced except in full without the written permission of the test laboratory and shall not be quoted out of context.

Report No.: AGC07428170301FE01 Page 2 of 18 Report Revise Record Report Version Revise Time Issued Date Valid Version Notes V1.0 / June 29, 2017 Valid Original Report

Report No.: AGC07428170301FE01 Page 3 of 18 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. VERIFICATION OF CONFORMITY .............................................................................................................. 4 2. GENERAL INFORMATION ........................................................................................................................... 5 2.1. PRODUCT DESCRIPTION ................................................................................................................... 5 2.2. RELATED SUBMITTAL(S) / GRANT (S) ............................................................................................... 5 2.3. TEST METHODOLOGY ........................................................................................................................ 5 2.4. SPECIAL ACCESSORIES ..................................................................................................................... 5 2.5. EQUIPMENT MODIFICATIONS ............................................................................................................ 5 3. MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY................................................................................................................ 6 4. DESCRIPTION OF TEST MODES................................................................................................................ 6 5. SYSTEM TEST CONFIGURATION .............................................................................................................. 6 5.1. EQUIPMENT USED IN EUT SYSTEM .................................................................................................. 6 5.2. SUMMARY OF TEST RESULTS ........................................................................................................... 6 6. TEST FACILITY............................................................................................................................................. 7 7. RADIATED EMISSION.................................................................................................................................. 8 7.1. MEASUREMENT PROCEDURE ........................................................................................................... 8 7.2. TEST SETUP ....................................................................................................................................... 10 7.3. TEST RESULT ..................................................................................................................................... 11 8. FCC LINE CONDUCTED EMISSION TEST ............................................................................................... 13 8.1. LIMITS OF LINE CONDUCTED EMISSION TEST ............................................................................. 13 8.2. BLOCK DIAGRAM OF LINE CONDUCTED EMISSION TEST .......................................................... 13 8.3. PRELIMINARY PROCEDURE OF LINE CONDUCTED EMISSION TEST ........................................ 14 8.4. FINAL PROCEDURE OF LINE CONDUCTED EMISSION TEST ...................................................... 14 8.5. TEST RESULT OF LINE CONDUCTED EMISSION TEST ................................................................ 15 APPENDIX A: PHOTOGRAPHS OF TEST SETUP ....................................................................................... 17

Report No.: AGC07428170301FE01 Page 4 of 18 1. VERIFICATION OF CONFORMITY Applicant Mikrotikls SIA Address Pernavas 46 Riga Latvia LV-1009 Manufacturer Mikrotikls SIA Address Pernavas 46 Riga Latvia LV-1009 Product Designation RouterBOARD wAP R-2nD Brand Name RouterBOARD Test Model wAP R Serial Model RBwAPR-2nD Model Difference All the same except the model name. Date of test June 24, 2017~June 29, 2017 Deviation None Condition of Test Sample Normal Test Result Pass Report Template AGCRT-US-BR/RF (2013-03-01) We hereby certify that: The above equipment was tested by Dongguan Precise Testing Service Co., Ltd. The test data, data evaluation, test procedures, and equipment configurations shown in this report were made in accordance with the procedures given in ANSI C63.4 (2014) and the energy emitted by the sample EUT tested as described in this report is in compliance with radiated emission limits of FCC Rules Part 15 subpart B. Tested by Max Zhang(Zhang Yi) June 29, 2017 Reviewed by Bart Xie(Xie Xiaobin)) June 29, 2017 Approved by Solger Zhang(Zhang Hongyi) June 29, 2017 Authorized Officer

Report No.: AGC07428170301FE01 Page 5 of 18 2. GENERAL INFORMATION 2.1. PRODUCT DESCRIPTION A major technical description of EUT is described as following Hardware Version 2.0 Software Version 6.38.5 EUT Supply DC 24V by adapter 2.2. RELATED SUBMITTAL(S) / GRANT (S) This submittal(s) (test report) is intended for FCC ID: TV7WAPR2ND filing to comply with Section 15.107&109 of the FCC Part 15, Subpart B Rules. 2.3. TEST METHODOLOGY Both conducted and radiated testing was performed according to the procedures in ANSI C63.4 (2014). Radiated testing was performed at an antenna to EUT distance 3 meters. 2.4. SPECIAL ACCESSORIES Refer to section 5.1. 2.5. EQUIPMENT MODIFICATIONS Not available for this EUT intended for grant.

Report No.: AGC07428170301FE01 Page 6 of 18 3. MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY Conducted measurement: ±3.18dB Radiated measurement: ±3.91dB 4. DESCRIPTION OF TEST MODES NO. TEST MODE DESCRIPTION 1 Connected to PC for data exchange 5. SYSTEM TEST CONFIGURATION 5.1. EQUIPMENT USED IN EUT SYSTEM Item Equipment Model No. ID or Specification Remark 1 RouterBOARD wAP R-2nD wAP R TV7WAPR2ND EUT 2 PC SONY E1412AYCW Support 3 PC adapter SONY A13-040A3A Support 4 Adapter SAW30-240-0800U DC24V 0.8A Marketed 5.2. SUMMARY OF TEST RESULTS FCC RULES DESCRIPTION OF TEST RESULT §15.109 Radiated Emission Compliant §15.107 Conducted Emission Compliant

Report No.: AGC07428170301FE01 Page 7 of 18 6. TEST FACILITY Site Dongguan Precise Testing Service Co., Ltd. Building D, Baoding Technology Park, Guangming Road2, Dongcheng District, Location Dongguan, Guangdong, China FCC Registration 371540 No. The test site is constructed and calibrated to meet the FCC requirements in documents Description ANSI C63.4:2014. ALL TEST EQUIPMENT LIST Radiated Emission Test Site Model Last Due Name of Equipment Manufacturer Serial Number Number Calibration Calibration Rohde & EMI Test Receiver ESCI 101417 July 3, 2016 July 2, 2017 Schwarz Trilog Broadband Antenna SCHWARZBECK VULB9160 9160-3355 July 3, 2016 July 2, 2017 (25M-1GHz) Signal Amplifier SCHWARZBECK BBV 9475 9745-0013 July 3, 2016 July 2, 2017 RF Cable SCHWARZBECK AK9515E 96221 July 3, 2016 July 2, 2017 3m Anechoic Chamber CHENGYU 966 PTS-001 June 2, 2017 June 1, 2018 MULTI-DEVICE Positioning Max-Full MF-7802 MF780208339 N/A N/A Controller Active loop antenna Schwarzbeck FMZB1519 1519-038 June 2, 2017 June 1, 2018 (9K-30MHz) Spectrum analyzer Agilent E4407B MY46185649 June 2, 2017 June 1, 2018 Horn Antenna (1G-18GHz) SCHWARZBECK BBHA9120D 9120D-1246 June 2, 2017 June 1, 2018 Horn Ant (18G-40GHz) Schwarzbeck BBHA 9170 9170-181 June 2, 2017 June 1, 2018 Conducted Emission Test Site Model Last Name of Equipment Manufacturer Serial Number Due Calibration Number Calibration Rohde & EMI Test Receiver ESCI 101417 July 3, 2016 July 2, 2017 Schwarz Artificial Mains Network Narda L2-16B 000WX31025 July 3, 2016 July 2, 2017 Artificial Mains Network (AUX) Narda L2-16B 000WX31026 July 3, 2016 July 2, 2017 RF Cable SCHWARZBECK AK9515E 96222 July 3, 2016 July 2, 2017 Shielded Room CHENGYU 843 PTS-002 June 2, 2017 June 1, 2018

Report No.: AGC07428170301FE01 Page 8 of 18 7. RADIATED EMISSION 7.1. MEASUREMENT PROCEDURE 1. Configure the EUT according to ANSI C63.4. The EUT was placed on the top of the turntable 0.8 meter above ground. The phase center of the receiving antenna mounted on the top of a height-variable antenna tower was placed 3 meters far away from the turntable. 2. Power on the EUT and all the supporting units. The turntable was rotated by 360 degrees to determine the position of the highest radiation. 3. The height of the broadband receiving antenna was varied between one meter and four meters above ground to find the maximum emissions field strength of both horizontal and vertical polarization. 4. For each suspected emissions, the antenna tower was scan (from 1 M to 4 M) and then the turntable was rotated (from 0 degree to 360 degrees) to find the maximum reading. 5. Set the test-receiver system to Peak or CISPR quasi-peak Detect Function with specified bandwidth under Maximum Hold Mode. 6. For emissions below 1GHz, use 120KHz RBW and VBW>=3RBW for QP reading. 7. For emissions above 1GHz, use 1MHz VBW and RBW for peak reading. Then 1MHz RBW and 10Hz VBW for average reading in spectrum analyzer. 8. When the radiated emissions limits are expressed in terms of the average value of the emissions, and pulsed operation is employed, the measurement field strength shall be determined by averaging over one complete pulse train, including blanking intervals, as long as the pulse train does not exceed 0.1 seconds. As an alternative (provided the transmitter operates for longer than 0.1 seconds) or in cases where the pulse train exceeds 0.1 seconds, the measured field strength shall be determined from the average absolute voltage during a 0.1 second interval during which the field strength is at its maximum values. 9.If the emissions level of the EUT in peak mode was 3 dB lower than the average limit specified, then testing will be stopped and peak values of EUT will be reported, otherwise, the emissions which do not have 3 dB margin will be repeated one by one using the quasi-peak method for below 1GHz. 10. For testing above 1GHz, the emissions level of the EUT in peak mode was lower than average limit (that means the emissions level in peak mode also complies with the limit in average mode), then testing will be stopped and peak values of EUT will be reported, otherwise, the emissions will be measured in average mode again and reported. 11. In case the emission is lower than 30MHz, loop antenna has to be used for measurement and the recorded data should be QP measured by receiver. High - Low scan is not required in this case. 12. Only the worst case is reported.

Report No.: AGC07428170301FE01 Page 9 of 18 The following table is the setting of spectrum analyzer and receiver. Spectrum Parameter Setting Start ~Stop Frequency 9KHz~150KHz/RBW 200Hz for QP Start ~Stop Frequency 150KHz~30MHz/RBW 9KHz for QP Start ~Stop Frequency 30MHz~1000MHz/RBW 120KHz for QP 1GHz~26.5GHz Start ~Stop Frequency 1MHz/1MHz for Peak, 1MHz/10Hz for Average Receiver Parameter Setting Start ~Stop Frequency 9KHz~150KHz/RBW 200Hz for QP Start ~Stop Frequency 150KHz~30MHz/RBW 9KHz for QP Start ~Stop Frequency 30MHz~1000MHz/RBW 120KHz for QP

Report No.: AGC07428170301FE01 Page 10 of 18 7.2. TEST SETUP Radiated Emission Test-Setup Frequency Below 30MHz RADIATED EMISSION TEST SETUP 30MHz-1000MHz RADIATED EMISSION TEST SETUP ABOVE 1000MHz

Report No.: AGC07428170301FE01 Page 11 of 18 7.3. TEST RESULT RADIATED EMISSION BELOW 30MHz No emission found between lowest internal used/generated frequencies to 30MHz. RADIATED EMISSION BELOW 1GHZ-Horizontal

Report No.: AGC07428170301FE01 Page 12 of 18 RADIATED EMISSION BELOW 1GHZ-Vertical RESULT: PASS Note: 1. Factor=Antenna Factor + Cable loss - Amplifier gain, Margin=Measurement-Limit. 2. The “Factor” value can be calculated automatically by software of measurement system. 3. Emissions range from 1GHz to 12.5GHz have 20dB margin. No recording in the test report. 4. Only the data of the worst case would be record in this test report.

Report No.: AGC07428170301FE01 Page 13 of 18 8. FCC LINE CONDUCTED EMISSION TEST 8.1. LIMITS OF LINE CONDUCTED EMISSION TEST Maximum RF Line Voltage Frequency Q.P.( dBuV) Average( dBuV) 150kHz~500kHz 66-56 56-46 500kHz~5MHz 56 46 5MHz~30MHz 60 50 Note: 1. The lower limit shall apply at the transition frequency. 2. The limit decreases linearly with the logarithm of the frequency in the range 0.15 MHz to 0.50 MHz. 8.2. BLOCK DIAGRAM OF LINE CONDUCTED EMISSION TEST EUT & Support Units

Report No.: AGC07428170301FE01 Page 14 of 18 8.3. PRELIMINARY PROCEDURE OF LINE CONDUCTED EMISSION TEST 1. The equipment was set up as per the test configuration to simulate typical actual usage per the user’s manual. When the EUT is a tabletop system, a wooden table with a height of 0.8 meters is used and is placed on the ground plane as per ANSI C63.4 (see Test Facility for the dimensions of the ground plane used). When the EUT is a floor-standing equipment, it is placed on the ground plane which has a 3-12 mm non-conductive covering to insulate the EUT from the ground plane. 2. Support equipment, if needed, was placed as per ANSI C63.4. 3. All I/O cables were positioned to simulate typical actual usage as per ANSI C63.4. 4. All support equipments received AC120V/60Hz power from a LISN, if any. 5. The EUT received DC charging voltage by PC which received 120V/60Hzpower by a LISN.. 6. The test program was started. Emissions were measured on each current carrying line of the EUT using a spectrum Analyzer / Receiver connected to the LISN powering the EUT. The LISN has two monitoring points: Line 1 (Hot Side) and Line 2 (Neutral Side). Two scans were taken: one with Line 1 connected to Analyzer / Receiver and Line 2 connected to a 50 ohm load; the second scan had Line 1 connected to a 50 ohm load and Line 2 connected to the Analyzer / Receiver. 7. Analyzer / Receiver scanned from 150 kHz to 30MHz for emissions in each of the test modes. 8. During the above scans, the emissions were maximized by cable manipulation. 9. The test mode(s) were scanned during the preliminary test. Then, the EUT configuration and cable configuration of the above highest emission level were recorded for reference of final testing. 8.4. FINAL PROCEDURE OF LINE CONDUCTED EMISSION TEST 1. EUT and support equipment was set up on the test bench as per step 2 of the preliminary test. 2. A scan was taken on both power lines, Line 1 and Line 2, recording at least the six highest emissions. Emission frequency and amplitude were recorded into a computer in which correction factors were used to calculate the emission level and compare reading to the applicable limit. If EUT emission level was less –2dB to the A.V. limit in Peak mode, then the emission signal was re-checked using Q.P and Average detector. 3. The test data of the worst case condition(s) was reported on the Summary Data page.

Report No.: AGC07428170301FE01 Page 15 of 18 8.5. TEST RESULT OF LINE CONDUCTED EMISSION TEST Line Conducted Emission Test Line 1-L

Report No.: AGC07428170301FE01 Page 16 of 18 Line Conducted Emission Test Line 2-N RESULT: PASS

Report No.: AGC07428170301FE01 Page 17 of 18 APPENDIX A: PHOTOGRAPHS OF TEST SETUP RADIATED EMISSION TEST SETUP BELOW 1GHz RADIATE EMISSION TEST SETUP ABOVE 1GHz

Report No.: AGC07428170301FE01 Page 18 of 18 CONDUCTED EMISSION TEST SETUP ----END OF REPORT----


Document Created: 2017-07-28 05:41:21
Document Modified: 2017-07-28 05:41:21
© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC