Test Report rev.pdf

FCC ID: TLZ-CU300

Test Report

Download: PDF
FCCID_2992004

FCC Test Report Report No.: RF150528E05C FCC ID: TLZ-CU300 Test Model: AW-CU300A Series Model: AW-CU300 Received Date: Mar. 30, 2016 Test Date: Apr. 08 to 11, 2016 Issued Date: Apr. 29, 2016 Applicant: AzureWave Technologies, Inc. Address: 8F., No.94, Baozhong Rd. , Xindian Dist., New Taipei City , Taiwan 231 Issued By: Bureau Veritas Consumer Products Services (H.K.) Ltd., Taoyuan Branch Hsin Chu Laboratory Lab Address: E-2, No.1, Li Hsin 1st Road, Hsinchu Science Park, Hsinchu City 300, Taiwan R.O.C. Test Location (1): E-2, No.1, Li Hsin 1st Road, Hsinchu Science Park, Hsinchu City 300, Taiwan R.O.C. Test Location (2): No. 49, Ln. 206, Wende Rd., Shangshan Tsuen, Chiung Lin Hsiang, Hsin Chu Hsien 307, Taiwan R.O.C. This report is for your exclusive use. Any copying or replication of this report to or for any other person or entity, or use of our name or trademark, is permitted only with our prior written permission. This report sets forth our findings solely with respect to the test samples identified herein. The results set forth in this report are not indicative or representative of the quality or characteristics of the lot from which a test sample was taken or any similar or identical product unless specifically and expressly noted. Our report includes all of the tests requested by you and the results thereof based upon the information that you provided to us. You have 60 days from date of issuance of this report to notify us of any material error or omission caused by our negligence, provided, however, that such notice shall be in writing and shall specifically address the issue you wish to raise. A failure to raise such issue within the prescribed time shall constitute your unqualified acceptance of the completeness of this report, the tests conducted and the correctness of the report contents. Unless specific mention, the uncertainty of measurement has been explicitly taken into account to declare the compliance or non-compliance to the specification. The report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by TAF or any government agencies. Report No.: RF150528E05C Page No. 1 / 25 Report Format Version: 6.1.1 Reference No.: 160330E02

Table of Contents Release Control Record .................................................................................................................................. 3 1 Certificate of Conformity...................................................................................................................... 4 2 Summary of Test Results ..................................................................................................................... 5 2.1 Measurement Uncertainty ................................................................................................................... 5 2.2 Modification Record ............................................................................................................................ 5 3 General Information .............................................................................................................................. 6 3.1 General Description of EUT ................................................................................................................ 6 3.2 Description of Test Modes ................................................................................................................... 8 3.2.1 Test Mode Applicability and Tested Channel Detail............................................................................. 9 3.3 Description of Support Units ............................................................................................................. 10 3.3.1 Configuration of System under Test .................................................................................................. 10 3.4 General Description of Applied Standards ......................................................................................... 11 4 Test Types and Results ...................................................................................................................... 12 4.1 Radiated Emission Measurement ..................................................................................................... 12 4.1.1 Limits of Radiated Emission Measurement ....................................................................................... 12 4.1.2 Test Instruments ................................................................................................................................ 13 4.1.3 Test Procedures................................................................................................................................. 14 4.1.4 Deviation from Test Standard ............................................................................................................ 14 4.1.5 Test Setup .......................................................................................................................................... 15 4.1.6 EUT Operating Conditions................................................................................................................. 15 4.1.7 Test Results (Mode 1)........................................................................................................................ 16 4.1.8 Test Results (Mode 2)........................................................................................................................ 17 4.1.9 Test Results (Mode 3)........................................................................................................................ 18 4.1.10 Test Results (Mode 4)........................................................................................................................ 19 4.2 Conducted Emission Measurement .................................................................................................. 20 4.2.1 Limits of Conducted Emission Measurement .................................................................................... 20 4.2.2 Test Instruments ................................................................................................................................ 20 4.2.3 Test Procedures................................................................................................................................. 21 4.2.4 Deviation from Test Standard ............................................................................................................ 21 4.2.5 Test Setup .......................................................................................................................................... 21 4.2.6 EUT Operating Conditions................................................................................................................. 21 4.2.7 Test Results ....................................................................................................................................... 22 5 Pictures of Test Arrangements .......................................................................................................... 24 Appendix – Information on the Testing Laboratories ................................................................................ 25 Report No.: RF150528E05C Page No. 2 / 25 Report Format Version: 6.1.1 Reference No.: 160330E02

Release Control Record Issue No. Description Date Issued RF150528E05C Original release. Apr. 29, 2016 Report No.: RF150528E05C Page No. 3 / 25 Report Format Version: 6.1.1 Reference No.: 160330E02

1 Certificate of Conformity Product: IEEE 802.11 b/g/in WLAN Microcontroller Module Brand: AzureWave Test Model: AW—CU300A Series Model: AW—CU300 Sample Status: ENGINEERING SAMPLE Applicant: AzureWave Technologies, Inc. Test Date: Apr. 08 to 11, 2016 Standards: 47 CFR FCC Part 15, Subpart C (Section 15.247) ANSI C63.10: 2013 The above equipment has been tested by Bureau Veritas Consumer Products Services (H.K.) Ltd., Taoyuan Branch, and found compliance with the requirement of the above standards. The test record, data evaluation & Equipment Under Test (EUT) configurations represented herein are true and accurate accounts of the measurements of the sample‘s EMC characteristics under the conditions specified in this report. Prepared by : Ms A o |& r—\/ , Date: Apr. 29, 2016 Midoli Peng / Specialist Approved by : _ /7// i , Date: Apr. 29, 2016 #*" May/n/en / Manager Report No.: RF150528E05C Page No. 4 / 25 Report Format Version: 6.1.1 Reference No.: 160330E02

2 Summary of Test Results 47 CFR FCC Part 15, Subpart C (SECTION 15.247) FCC Test Item Result Remarks Clause Meet the requirement of limit. 15.207 AC Power Conducted Emission PASS Minimum passing margin is -19.29dB at 0.37266MHz. Meet the requirement of limit. 15.205 / Radiated Emissions PASS Minimum passing margin is -3.8dB at 15.209 302.40MHz. NOTE: 1 This report is prepared for FCC Class II change. (Changed the PCB size is extended and added model name, flash component, one antenna). 2.1 Measurement Uncertainty Where relevant, the following measurement uncertainty levels have been estimated for tests performed on the EUT as specified in CISPR 16-4-2: Expended Uncertainty Measurement Frequency (k=2) (±) Conducted Emissions at mains ports 150kHz ~ 30MHz 2.86 dB Radiated Emissions up to 1 GHz 30MHz ~ 1GHz 5.43 dB 2.2 Modification Record There were no modifications required for compliance. Report No.: RF150528E05C Page No. 5 / 25 Report Format Version: 6.1.1 Reference No.: 160330E02

3 General Information 3.1 General Description of EUT Product IEEE 802.11 b/g/n WLAN Microcontroller Module Brand AzureWave Test Model AW-CU300A Series Model AW-CU300 Status of EUT ENGINEERING SAMPLE Power Supply Rating 3.3Vdc from host equipment CCK, DQPSK, DBPSK for DSSS Modulation Type 64QAM, 16QAM, QPSK, BPSK for OFDM Modulation Technology DSSS, OFDM 802.11b: up to 11Mbps Transfer Rate 802.11g: up to 54Mbps 802.11n : up to 72.2Mbps Operating Frequency 2.412 ~ 2.462GHz Number of Channel 11 802.11b: 100.231mW Output Power 802.11g: 204.644mW 802.11n (HT20): 162.555mW Antenna Type Please see Note Antenna Connector Please see Note Accessory Device NA Data Cable Supplied NA Report No.: RF150528E05C Page No. 6 / 25 Report Format Version: 6.1.1 Reference No.: 160330E02

Note: 1. This report is prepared for FCC Class II change. The difference compared with the Report No.: RF150528E05 design is as the following:  Changed the PCB size is extended and added model name , flash component as below table: Original Brand Model No. Remark AzureWave AW-CU300 - Newly Brand Model No. Remark PCB size is extended AzureWave AW-CU300A added flash component From the above models, model: AW-CU300A was selected as representative model for the test and its data was recorded in this report.  Added 1 new antenna(No. 9) as below table: Original Gain (dBi) Cable Antenna Connector Frequency range Antenna No Brand Model (Including Length Type Type (GHz to GHz) cable loss) (mm) 1(Internal) AzureWave AW-CU300 ANT 5.12 PCB NA 2.4~2.4835 NA 2(External) TAOGLAS FXP73.07.0100A 3 Monopole I-PEX 2.4~2.4835 100 3(External) TAOGLAS PC11.07.0100A 3 Dipole I-PEX 2.4~2.4835 100 4(External) TAOGLAS FXP74.07.0100A 4 PIFA I-PEX 2.4~2.4835 100 5(External) TAOGLAS GW.17.07.0250E 2.7 Dipole I-PEX 2.4~2.4835 250 6(External) TAOGLAS PC17.07.0070A 0.9 PIFA I-PEX 2.4~2.4835 70 7(External) LAIRD NanoBlue-IP04_MAF94045 2 Monopole I-PEX 2.4~2.4835 100 8(External) MAG.LAYERS EDA_1313_2G4C1-A16 2.39 Dipole I-PEX 2.4~2.4835 150 Newly Gain (dBi) Cable Antenna Connector Frequency range Antenna No Brand Model (Including Length Type Type (GHz to GHz) cable loss) (mm) 9(External) LAIRD EBL2400A1-23UFL 2.45 Dipole I-PEX 2.4~2.4835 230 Antennas 1~4 were chosen for final test. 2. According to above conditions, only radiated emissions below 1GHz / conducted emissions need to be performed. And all data was verified to meet the requirements. 3. The EUT incorporates a SISO function. MODULATION MODE DATA RATE (MCS) TX & RX CONFIGURATION 802.11b 1 ~ 11Mbps 1TX 1RX 802.11g 6 ~ 54Mbps 1TX 1RX 802.11n (HT20) MCS 0~7 1TX 1RX 4. The above EUT information is declared by manufacturer and for more detailed features description, please refer to the manufacturer's specifications or user's manual. Report No.: RF150528E05C Page No. 7 / 25 Report Format Version: 6.1.1 Reference No.: 160330E02

3.2 Description of Test Modes 11 channels are provided for 802.11b, 802.11g and 802.11n (HT20): Channel Frequency Channel Frequency 1 2412MHz 7 2442MHz 2 2417MHz 8 2447MHz 3 2422MHz 9 2452MHz 4 2427MHz 10 2457MHz 5 2432MHz 11 2462MHz 6 2437MHz Report No.: RF150528E05C Page No. 8 / 25 Report Format Version: 6.1.1 Reference No.: 160330E02

3.2.1 Test Mode Applicability and Tested Channel Detail EUT APPLICABLE TO CONFIGURE DESCRIPTION MODE RE<1G PLC 1 √ √ With antenna 1 (PCB) 2 √ - With antenna 2 (Monopole) 3 √ - With antenna 3 (Dipole) 4 √ - With antenna 4 (PIFA) Where RE<1G: Radiated Emission below 1GHz PLC: Power Line Conducted Emission NOTE 1: “-”means no effect. NOTE 2: In original report, Antenna placement had been investigated on the positioned of each 3 axis. Following worst case were found as listed below. Antenna Worst position PCB Y-plane Monopole Y-plane PIFA X-plane Radiated Emission Test (Below 1GHz): Pre-Scan has been conducted to determine the worst-case mode from all possible combinations between available modulations, data rates and antenna ports (if EUT with antenna diversity architecture). Following channel(s) was (were) selected for the final test as listed below. AVAILABLE TESTED MODULATION MODULATION DATA RATE MODE CHANNEL CHANNEL TECHNOLOGY TYPE (Mbps) 802.11g 1 to 11 6 OFDM BPSK 6 Power Line Conducted Emission Test: Pre-Scan has been conducted to determine the worst-case mode from all possible combinations between available modulations, data rates and antenna ports (if EUT with antenna diversity architecture). Following channel(s) was (were) selected for the final test as listed below. AVAILABLE TESTED MODULATION MODULATION DATA RATE MODE CHANNEL CHANNEL TECHNOLOGY TYPE (Mbps) 802.11g 1 to 11 6 OFDM BPSK 6 Test Condition: INPUT POWER APPLICABLE TO ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS TESTED BY (SYSTEM) RE<1G 21deg. C, 67%RH 120Vac, 60Hz Gary Cheng PLC 25deg. C, 65%RH 120Vac, 60Hz Wythe Lin Report No.: RF150528E05C Page No. 9 / 25 Report Format Version: 6.1.1 Reference No.: 160330E02

3.3 Description of Support Units The EUT has been tested as an independent unit together with other necessary accessories or support units. The following support units or accessories were used to form a representative test configuration during the tests. No. Product Brand Model No. Serial No. FCC ID Remark NOTEBOOK A DELL PP32LA GSLB32S FCC DoC Provided by Lab COMPUTER B TEST TOOL AzureWave NA NA NA Supplied by client NOTE: 1. All power cords of the above support units are non-shielded (1.8 m). 2. Items B-C acted as communication partners to transfer data. Shielded Cores No. Cable Qty. Length (m) Remark (Yes/ No) (Number) 1 USB 1 1.6 Yes 0 Provided by Lab NOTE: 1. The core(s) is(are) originally attached to the cable(s). 3.3.1 Configuration of System under Test NOTEBOOK 1 TEST TOOL (B) EUT COMPUTER (A) Report No.: RF150528E05C Page No. 10 / 25 Report Format Version: 6.1.1 Reference No.: 160330E02

3.4 General Description of Applied Standards The EUT is a RF Product. According to the specifications of the manufacturer, it must comply with the requirements of the following standards: FCC Part 15, Subpart C (15.247) KDB 558074 D01 DTS Meas Guidance v03r05 ANSI C63.10-2013 All test items have been performed and recorded as per the above standards. NOTE: The EUT has been verified to comply with the requirements of FCC Part 15, Subpart B, Class B (DoC). The test report has been issued separately. Report No.: RF150528E05C Page No. 11 / 25 Report Format Version: 6.1.1 Reference No.: 160330E02

4 Test Types and Results 4.1 Radiated Emission Measurement 4.1.1 Limits of Radiated Emission Measurement Radiated emissions which fall in the restricted bands must comply with the radiated emission limits specified as below table. Other emissions shall be at least 20dB below the highest level of the desired power: Frequencies Field Strength Measurement Distance (MHz) (microvolts/meter) (meters) 0.009 ~ 0.490 2400/F(kHz) 300 0.490 ~ 1.705 24000/F(kHz) 30 1.705 ~ 30.0 30 30 30 ~ 88 100 3 88 ~ 216 150 3 216 ~ 960 200 3 Above 960 500 3 NOTE: 1. The lower limit shall apply at the transition frequencies. 2. Emission level (dBuV/m) = 20 log Emission level (uV/m). 3. For frequencies above 1000MHz, the field strength limits are based on average detector, however, the peak field strength of any emission shall not exceed the maximum permitted average limits, specified above by more than 20dB under any condition of modulation. Report No.: RF150528E05C Page No. 12 / 25 Report Format Version: 6.1.1 Reference No.: 160330E02

4.1.2 Test Instruments DESCRIPTION & CALIBRATED CALIBRATED MODEL NO. SERIAL NO. MANUFACTURER DATE UNTIL Test Receiver N9038A MY51210202 Dec. 16, 2015 Dec. 15, 2016 Agilent Pre-Amplifier(*) EMC001340 980142 Jan. 20, 2016 Jan. 19, 2018 EMCI Loop Antenna(*) EM-6879 264 Dec. 16, 2014 Dec. 15, 2016 Electro-Metrics LOOPCAB-001 RF Cable NA Jan. 18, 2016 Jan. 17, 2017 LOOPCAB-002 Pre-Amplifier ZFL-1000VH2 AMP-ZFL-04 Nov. 11, 2015 Nov. 10, 2016 Mini-Circuits B Trilog Broadband Antenna VULB 9168 9168-361 Jan. 07, 2016 Jan. 06, 2017 SCHWARZBECK CHHCAB-001- 1 8D-FB Oct. 04, 2015 Oct. 03, 2016 RF Cable CHHCAB-001- 2 RF-141 CHHCAB-004 Oct. 04, 2015 Oct. 03, 2016 ADT_Radiated Software NA NA NA _V8.7.07 Antenna Tower & Turn Table NA NA NA NA CT Boresight Antenna Fixture NA NA NA NA Note: 1. The calibration interval of the above test instruments is 12 months and the calibrations are traceable to NML/ROC and NIST/USA. 2. *The calibration interval of the above test instruments is 24 months and the calibrations are traceable to NML/ROC and NIST/USA. 3 Loop antenna was used for all emissions below 30 MHz. 4. The test was performed in 966 Chamber No. H. 5 The FCC Site Registration No. is 797305. 6 The CANADA Site Registration No. is IC 7450H-3. 7. Tested Date: Apr. 08, 2016 Report No.: RF150528E05C Page No. 13 / 25 Report Format Version: 6.1.1 Reference No.: 160330E02

4.1.3 Test Procedures a. The EUT was placed on the top of a rotating table 0.8 meters above the ground at 3 meter chamber room for test. The table was rotated 360 degrees to determine the position of the highest radiation. b. The EUT was set 3 meters away from the interference-receiving antenna, which was mounted on the top of a variable-height antenna tower. c. The height of antenna is varied from one meter to four meters above the ground to determine the maximum value of the field strength. Both horizontal and vertical polarizations of the antenna are set to make the measurement. d. For each suspected emission, the EUT was arranged to its worst case and then the antenna was tuned to heights from 1 meter to 4 meters and the rotatable table was turned from 0 degrees to 360 degrees to find the maximum reading. e. The test-receiver system was set to quasi-peak detect function and specified bandwidth with maximum hold mode when the test frequency is below 1 GHz. Note: 1. The resolution bandwidth and video bandwidth of test receiver/spectrum analyzer is 120kHz for Quasi-peak detection (QP) at frequency below 1GHz. 2. All modes of operation were investigated and the worst-case emissions are reported. 4.1.4 Deviation from Test Standard No deviation. Report No.: RF150528E05C Page No. 14 / 25 Report Format Version: 6.1.1 Reference No.: 160330E02

4.1.5 Test Setup Ant. Tower 1-4m Variable EUT& 3m 10m Support Units Turn Table 80cm Ground Plane Test Receiver For the actual test configuration, please refer to the attached file (Test Setup Photo). 4.1.6 EUT Operating Conditions 1. Connect the EUT with the support unit A (Notebook computer) which is placed on a testing table. 2. The communication partner run test program “DutApiWiFi8845BrdigeUart.exe” to enable EUT under transmission/receiving condition continuously at specific channel frequency. Report No.: RF150528E05C Page No. 15 / 25 Report Format Version: 6.1.1 Reference No.: 160330E02

4.1.7 Test Results (Mode 1) Below 1GHz Data: 802.11g CHANNEL TX Channel 6 DETECTOR Quasi-Peak (QP) FREQUENCY RANGE Below 1GHz FUNCTION ANTENNA POLARITY & TEST DISTANCE: HORIZONTAL AT 3 M EMISSION ANTENNA TABLE RAW CORRECTION FREQ. LIMIT MARGIN NO. LEVEL HEIGHT ANGLE VALUE FACTOR (MHz) (dBuV/m) (dB) (dBuV/m) (m) (Degree) (dBuV) (dB/m) 1 48.80 26.7 QP 40.0 -13.3 1.10 H 109 39.94 -13.24 2 150.14 34.8 QP 43.5 -8.7 1.10 H 204 47.60 -12.82 3 216.00 35.2 QP 43.5 -8.3 1.00 H 74 51.27 -16.09 4 295.77 40.5 QP 46.0 -5.5 1.10 H 109 52.57 -12.08 5 321.16 39.2 QP 46.0 -6.8 1.10 H 306 50.26 -11.06 6 609.40 33.4 QP 46.0 -12.6 1.20 H 178 37.83 -4.45 ANTENNA POLARITY & TEST DISTANCE: VERTICAL AT 3 M EMISSION ANTENNA TABLE RAW CORRECTION FREQ. LIMIT MARGIN NO. LEVEL HEIGHT ANGLE VALUE FACTOR (MHz) (dBuV/m) (dB) (dBuV/m) (m) (Degree) (dBuV) (dB/m) 1 33.60 33.2 QP 40.0 -6.8 1.20 V 102 47.67 -14.47 2 48.90 36.1 QP 40.0 -3.9 1.10 V 102 49.37 -13.24 3 146.80 35.8 QP 43.5 -7.7 1.20 V 170 48.65 -12.88 4 199.99 34.8 QP 43.5 -8.7 1.10 V 300 50.77 -15.98 5 302.40 42.2 QP 46.0 -3.8 1.10 V 128 54.04 -11.80 6 322.80 37.8 QP 46.0 -8.2 1.10 V 114 48.79 -11.00 REMARKS: 1. Emission Level(dBuV/m) = Raw Value(dBuV) + Correction Factor(dB/m) 2. Correction Factor(dB/m) = Antenna Factor(dB/m) + Cable Factor(dB) – Pre-Amplifier Factor(dB) 3. The other emission levels were very low against the limit. 4. Margin value = Emission Level – Limit value Report No.: RF150528E05C Page No. 16 / 25 Report Format Version: 6.1.1 Reference No.: 160330E02

4.1.8 Test Results (Mode 2) Below 1GHz Data: 802.11g CHANNEL TX Channel 6 DETECTOR Quasi-Peak (QP) FREQUENCY RANGE Below 1GHz FUNCTION ANTENNA POLARITY & TEST DISTANCE: HORIZONTAL AT 3 M EMISSION ANTENNA TABLE RAW CORRECTION FREQ. LIMIT MARGIN NO. LEVEL HEIGHT ANGLE VALUE FACTOR (MHz) (dBuV/m) (dB) (dBuV/m) (m) (Degree) (dBuV) (dB/m) 1 146.90 34.4 QP 43.5 -9.1 1.10 H 207 47.25 -12.87 2 261.10 35.4 QP 46.0 -10.6 1.20 H 100 49.02 -13.58 3 293.42 39.8 QP 46.0 -6.2 1.10 H 101 51.96 -12.19 4 323.44 38.3 QP 46.0 -7.7 1.10 H 195 49.25 -10.97 5 604.60 32.4 QP 46.0 -13.6 1.10 H 10 36.95 -4.57 6 699.78 31.4 QP 46.0 -14.6 1.10 H 100 34.79 -3.37 ANTENNA POLARITY & TEST DISTANCE: VERTICAL AT 3 M EMISSION ANTENNA TABLE RAW CORRECTION FREQ. LIMIT MARGIN NO. LEVEL HEIGHT ANGLE VALUE FACTOR (MHz) (dBuV/m) (dB) (dBuV/m) (m) (Degree) (dBuV) (dB/m) 1 48.14 35.0 QP 40.0 -5.0 1.10 V 107 48.20 -13.22 2 146.41 35.1 QP 43.5 -8.4 1.10 V 106 48.02 -12.91 3 199.02 34.7 QP 43.5 -8.8 1.10 V 317 50.68 -16.00 4 217.50 33.4 QP 46.0 -12.6 1.10 V 106 49.46 -16.09 5 304.29 41.8 QP 46.0 -4.2 1.10 V 41 53.51 -11.74 6 475.44 34.7 QP 46.0 -11.3 1.20 V 110 42.43 -7.73 REMARKS: 1. Emission Level(dBuV/m) = Raw Value(dBuV) + Correction Factor(dB/m) 2. Correction Factor(dB/m) = Antenna Factor(dB/m) + Cable Factor(dB) – Pre-Amplifier Factor(dB) 3. The other emission levels were very low against the limit. 4. Margin value = Emission Level – Limit value Report No.: RF150528E05C Page No. 17 / 25 Report Format Version: 6.1.1 Reference No.: 160330E02

4.1.9 Test Results (Mode 3) Below 1GHz Data: 802.11g CHANNEL TX Channel 6 DETECTOR Quasi-Peak (QP) FREQUENCY RANGE Below 1GHz FUNCTION ANTENNA POLARITY & TEST DISTANCE: HORIZONTAL AT 3 M EMISSION ANTENNA TABLE RAW CORRECTION FREQ. LIMIT MARGIN NO. LEVEL HEIGHT ANGLE VALUE FACTOR (MHz) (dBuV/m) (dB) (dBuV/m) (m) (Degree) (dBuV) (dB/m) 1 147.32 35.0 QP 43.5 -8.5 1.10 H 218 47.85 -12.83 2 216.14 34.8 QP 46.0 -11.2 1.10 H 70 50.86 -16.09 3 289.14 39.9 QP 46.0 -6.1 1.10 H 142 52.25 -12.35 4 324.80 39.2 QP 46.0 -6.8 1.10 H 309 50.14 -10.94 5 604.60 35.0 QP 46.0 -11.0 1.10 H 105 39.59 -4.57 6 698.80 35.5 QP 46.0 -10.5 1.10 H 107 38.91 -3.37 ANTENNA POLARITY & TEST DISTANCE: VERTICAL AT 3 M EMISSION ANTENNA TABLE RAW CORRECTION FREQ. LIMIT MARGIN NO. LEVEL HEIGHT ANGLE VALUE FACTOR (MHz) (dBuV/m) (dB) (dBuV/m) (m) (Degree) (dBuV) (dB/m) 1 147.22 34.0 QP 43.5 -9.5 1.00 V 210 46.86 -12.84 2 216.01 36.6 QP 46.0 -9.5 1.00 V 200 52.64 -16.09 3 291.77 40.5 QP 46.0 -5.5 1.10 V 115 52.76 -12.26 4 324.25 39.1 QP 46.0 -6.9 1.10 V 104 50.07 -10.95 5 609.28 34.3 QP 46.0 -11.7 1.00 V 110 38.73 -4.45 6 713.11 34.2 QP 46.0 -11.8 1.00 V 112 37.45 -3.25 REMARKS: 1. Emission Level(dBuV/m) = Raw Value(dBuV) + Correction Factor(dB/m) 2. Correction Factor(dB/m) = Antenna Factor(dB/m) + Cable Factor(dB) – Pre-Amplifier Factor(dB) 3. The other emission levels were very low against the limit. 4. Margin value = Emission Level – Limit value Report No.: RF150528E05C Page No. 18 / 25 Report Format Version: 6.1.1 Reference No.: 160330E02

4.1.10 Test Results (Mode 4) Below 1GHz Data: 802.11g CHANNEL TX Channel 6 DETECTOR Quasi-Peak (QP) FREQUENCY RANGE Below 1GHz FUNCTION ANTENNA POLARITY & TEST DISTANCE: HORIZONTAL AT 3 M EMISSION ANTENNA TABLE RAW CORRECTION FREQ. LIMIT MARGIN NO. LEVEL HEIGHT ANGLE VALUE FACTOR (MHz) (dBuV/m) (dB) (dBuV/m) (m) (Degree) (dBuV) (dB/m) 1 143.90 33.8 QP 43.5 -9.7 1.60 H 209 46.76 -12.99 2 232.38 34.4 QP 46.0 -11.6 1.10 H 151 49.26 -14.86 3 285.90 39.4 QP 46.0 -6.6 1.10 H 106 51.81 -12.43 4 335.90 39.6 QP 46.0 -6.4 1.10 H 110 50.41 -10.77 5 609.02 33.3 QP 46.0 -12.7 1.10 H 105 37.75 -4.46 6 699.38 36.1 QP 46.0 -9.9 1.10 H 104 39.48 -3.37 ANTENNA POLARITY & TEST DISTANCE: VERTICAL AT 3 M EMISSION ANTENNA TABLE RAW CORRECTION FREQ. LIMIT MARGIN NO. LEVEL HEIGHT ANGLE VALUE FACTOR (MHz) (dBuV/m) (dB) (dBuV/m) (m) (Degree) (dBuV) (dB/m) 1 33.93 27.8 QP 40.0 -12.2 1.00 V 18 42.20 -14.39 2 47.14 35.8 QP 40.0 -4.2 1.10 V 101 49.11 -13.33 3 147.20 34.8 QP 43.5 -8.7 1.10 V 191 47.62 -12.84 4 199.99 32.9 QP 43.5 -10.6 1.00 V 343 48.89 -15.98 5 304.60 41.9 QP 46.0 -4.1 1.10 V 100 53.59 -11.73 6 329.43 37.4 QP 46.0 -8.6 1.20 V 109 48.24 -10.80 REMARKS: 1. Emission Level(dBuV/m) = Raw Value(dBuV) + Correction Factor(dB/m) 2. Correction Factor(dB/m) = Antenna Factor(dB/m) + Cable Factor(dB) – Pre-Amplifier Factor(dB) 3. The other emission levels were very low against the limit. 4. Margin value = Emission Level – Limit value Report No.: RF150528E05C Page No. 19 / 25 Report Format Version: 6.1.1 Reference No.: 160330E02

4.2 Conducted Emission Measurement 4.2.1 Limits of Conducted Emission Measurement Conducted Limit (dBuV) Frequency (MHz) Quasi-peak Average 0.15 - 0.5 66 - 56 56 - 46 0.50 - 5.0 56 46 5.0 - 30.0 60 50 Note: 1. The lower limit shall apply at the transition frequencies. 2. The limit decreases in line with the logarithm of the frequency in the range of 0.15 to 0.50MHz. 4.2.2 Test Instruments DESCRIPTION & CALIBRATED CALIBRATED MODEL NO. SERIAL NO. MANUFACTURER DATE UNTIL Test Receiver ESCS 30 100375 May 06, 2015 May 05, 2016 R&S Line-Impedance Stabilization Network NSLK-8127 8127-522 Sep. 01, 2015 Aug. 31, 2016 (for EUT) SCHWARZBECK Line-Impedance Stabilization Network ENV216 100072 June 11, 2015 June 10, 2016 (for Peripheral ) R&S RF Cable 5D-FB COCCAB-001 Mar. 08, 2016 Mar. 07, 2017 50 ohms Terminator N/A EMC-03 Sep. 23, 2015 Sep. 22, 2016 50 ohms Terminator N/A EMC-02 Oct. 01, 2015 Sep. 30, 2016 50 ohms Terminator E1-011315 13 Dec. 11 2015 Dec. 10 2016 Software BVADT_Cond_ NA NA NA BVADT V7.3.7.3 Note: 1. The calibration interval of the above test instruments are 12 months and the calibrations are traceable to NML/ROC and NIST/USA. 2. The test was performed in Shielded Room No. C. 3 The VCCI Con C Registration No. is C-3611. 4 Tested Date: Apr. 11, 2016 Report No.: RF150528E05C Page No. 20 / 25 Report Format Version: 6.1.1 Reference No.: 160330E02

4.2.3 Test Procedures a. The EUT was placed 0.4 meters from the conducting wall of the shielded room with EUT being connected to the power mains through a line impedance stabilization network (LISN). Other support units were connected to the power mains through another LISN. The two LISNs provide 50 ohm/ 50uH of coupling impedance for the measuring instrument. b. Both lines of the power mains connected to the EUT were checked for maximum conducted interference. c. The frequency range from 150kHz to 30MHz was searched. Emission levels under (Limit - 20dB) was not recorded. NOTE: The resolution bandwidth and video bandwidth of test receiver is 9kHz for quasi-peak detection (QP) and average detection (AV) at frequency 0.15MHz-30MHz. 4.2.4 Deviation from Test Standard No deviation. 4.2.5 Test Setup Vertical Ground Reference Plane Test Receiver EUT 40cm 80cm LISN Horizontal Ground Reference Plane Note: 1.Support units were connected to second LISN. For the actual test configuration, please refer to the attached file (Test Setup Photo). 4.2.6 EUT Operating Conditions Same as 4.1.6. Report No.: RF150528E05C Page No. 21 / 25 Report Format Version: 6.1.1 Reference No.: 160330E02

4.2.7 Test Results Quasi-Peak (QP) / Phase Line (L) Detector Function Average (AV) Phase Of Power : Line (L) Frequency Correction Reading Value Emission Level Limit Margin No Factor (dBuV) (dBuV) (dBuV) (dB) (MHz) (dB) Q.P. AV. Q.P. AV. Q.P. AV. Q.P. AV. 1 0.15000 10.32 11.94 4.57 22.26 14.89 66.00 56.00 -43.74 -41.11 2 0.37266 10.30 20.68 18.85 30.98 29.15 58.44 48.44 -27.46 -19.29 3 0.39916 10.30 16.71 15.78 27.01 26.08 57.87 47.87 -30.86 -21.79 4 1.59766 10.25 11.04 5.72 21.29 15.97 56.00 46.00 -34.71 -30.03 5 2.35156 10.29 12.82 7.94 23.11 18.23 56.00 46.00 -32.89 -27.77 6 2.87891 10.33 12.96 8.29 23.29 18.62 56.00 46.00 -32.71 -27.38 Remarks: 1. Q.P. and AV. are abbreviations of quasi-peak and average individually. 2. The emission levels of other frequencies were very low against the limit. 3. Margin value = Emission level – Limit value 4. Correction factor = Insertion loss + Cable loss 5. Emission Level = Correction Factor + Reading Value Report No.: RF150528E05C Page No. 22 / 25 Report Format Version: 6.1.1 Reference No.: 160330E02

Quasi-Peak (QP) / Phase Neutral (N) Detector Function Average (AV) Phase Of Power : Neutral (N) Frequency Correction Reading Value Emission Level Limit Margin No Factor (dBuV) (dBuV) (dBuV) (dB) (MHz) (dB) Q.P. AV. Q.P. AV. Q.P. AV. Q.P. AV. 1 0.15000 10.30 7.97 5.07 18.27 15.37 66.00 56.00 -47.73 -40.63 2 0.37866 10.28 19.15 15.02 29.43 25.30 58.31 48.31 -28.88 -23.01 3 0.39866 10.28 17.80 16.06 28.08 26.34 57.88 47.88 -29.80 -21.54 4 2.82422 10.33 12.39 6.31 22.72 16.64 56.00 46.00 -33.28 -29.36 5 4.58984 10.45 12.11 7.90 22.56 18.35 56.00 46.00 -33.44 -27.65 6 19.51953 10.96 11.54 6.31 22.50 17.27 60.00 50.00 -37.50 -32.73 Remarks: 1. Q.P. and AV. are abbreviations of quasi-peak and average individually. 2. The emission levels of other frequencies were very low against the limit. 3. Margin value = Emission level – Limit value 4. Correction factor = Insertion loss + Cable loss 5. Emission Level = Correction Factor + Reading Value Report No.: RF150528E05C Page No. 23 / 25 Report Format Version: 6.1.1 Reference No.: 160330E02

5 Pictures of Test Arrangements Please refer to the attached file (Test Setup Photo). Report No.: RF150528E05C Page No. 24 / 25 Report Format Version: 6.1.1 Reference No.: 160330E02

Appendix – Information on the Testing Laboratories We, Bureau Veritas Consumer Products Services (H.K.) Ltd., Taoyuan Branch, were founded in 1988 to provide our best service in EMC, Radio, Telecom and Safety consultation. Our laboratories are accredited and approved according to ISO/IEC 17025. If you have any comments, please feel free to contact us at the following: Linko EMC/RF Lab Hsin Chu EMC/RF/Telecom Lab Tel: 886-2-26052180 Tel: 886-3-6668565 Fax: 886-2-26051924 Fax: 886-3-6668323 Hwa Ya EMC/RF/Safety Lab Tel: 886-3-3183232 Fax: 886-3-3270892 Email: service.adt@tw.bureauveritas.com Web Site: www.bureauveritas-adt.com The address and road map of all our labs can be found in our web site also. --- END --- Report No.: RF150528E05C Page No. 25 / 25 Report Format Version: 6.1.1 Reference No.: 160330E02


Document Created: 2019-07-03 21:09:15
Document Modified: 2019-07-03 21:09:15
© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC