Exhibit 06 EMF Test Report Dot 4479 B41K

FCC ID: TA8AKRY901432-1

Test Report

Download: PDF
FCCID_4419914

                                                                                                                            1 (9)
GFTL-19:000861 Uen, Rev A, 2019-08-16




                                            Rapport utfärdad av ackrediterat provningslaboratorium
                                            Test report issued by an Accredited Testing Laboratory


           Ackred. Nr 1761
              Provning
           ISO/IEC 17025




         EMF Test Report: Ericsson Dot 4479/4489 B41K (FCC)

 Document number:                           GFTL-19:000861 Uen,               Date of report:      2019-08-16
                                            Rev A
 Testing laboratory:                        Ericsson EMF Research             Company/Client:      Denis Lalonde
                                            Laboratory
                                                                                                   Ericsson Canada
                                            Ericsson AB                                            349 Terry Fox Drive
                                            SE-164 80 Stockholm                                    Ottawa ON K2K 2V6
                                            Sweden                                                 Canada


 Tests performed by:                        Davide Colombi                    Dates of tests:      2019-08-16 (Rev A)



 Manufacturer and market                    Ericsson Dot 4479/4489 B41K
 name(s) of device:

 Testing has been performed                 FCC OET Bulletin 65
 in accordance with:

 Test results:                              Minimum separation distance for which the RF EMF exposure complies with the limits
                                            in FCC 47 CFR 1.1310 to be included in the Customer Product Information (CPI) for
                                            Ericsson Dot 4479/4489.


 Additional information:                    Testing was conducted for mobile exposure conditions according to KDB447498 DO1

 Signature:        Test Engineer                                                   Laboratory and Quality Manager




                   _________________________                                       ___________________________
                   Davide Colombi                                                  Christer Törnevik
                   Master Researcher                                               Senior Expert – EMF and Health
                   davide.colombi@ericsson.com                                     christer.tornevik@ericsson.com
                   Tel: +46 10 717 7089                                            Tel: +46 10 714 1235




© Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson AB.
This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of the laboratory.


                                                                                                                                         2 (9)
GFTL-19:000861 Uen, Rev A, 2019-08-16


1          Summary of EMF Test Report1

Equipment under test (EUT)
                                                         Ericsson Dot 4479 B41K (internal antennas)
    Product name
                                                         Ericsson Dot 4489 B41K (external antennas)
                                                         KRY 901 432/1
    Product number
                                                         KRY 901 432/2
    Supported bands, Tx frequency range
                                                         B41K (2600)                         2515–2675                          NR TDD
    (MHz), and standards
    Exposure environment                                 General public/uncontrolled




Results
The minimum (test) separation distance required for the equipment under test (EUT) to comply with the mobile
device exposure conditions and relevant limits applicable in the USA [1]-[3] is provided in the table below for
the general public (uncontrolled exposure).

RF exposure assessment results for general public (uncontrolled) exposure as obtained for Dot 4479/4489 B41K together with
an assumed output power tolerance of 2 dB using procedures applicable for the US market [3].
                                   Nominal output
                                                                          TDD DL duty         Separation
    Band         Standard          power from the      Test position
                                                                              cycle            distance
                                        radio
                                                         Direction of
    B41K            NR               4 x 0.25 W                               74%                34 cm
                                                       maximum gain




1
    This page contains a summary of the test results. The full report provides a complete description of all test details and results.


                                                                                                                                              3 (9)
GFTL-19:000861 Uen, Rev A, 2019-08-16


2         General information

The test results reported in this document have been obtained by simple calculations according to plane-wave
equivalent conditions [3]. The purpose of the tests was to verify that the EUT is in compliance with the
appropriate RF exposure standards, recommendations and limits [1]–[3].

It should be noted that the test results presented in this test report are valid for the frequency range and for
the antenna properties specified in Table 1, in addition to the power level, the power tolerance and TDD
downlink duty cycle specified in Table 2. These data were supplied by the client and may affect the validity of
the results.

The test results were determined for Dot 4479 B41K (equipped with internal antennas) and are also applicable
for Dot 4489 B41K connected to external antennas provided that the antenna gain is equal to or smaller than
4.9 dBi.


3         Equipment under test

Table 1 summarizes the technical data for the EUT. Photographs of the EUT are presented in Appendix A.
Table 1       Technical data for the EUT.

 Product name                                      Ericsson Dot 4479 B41K

 Product tested                                    KRY 901 432/1

 Supported bands, Tx frequency range
                                                   B41K (2600)                      2515–2675                        NR TDD
 (MHz), and standards

 Dimensions of Radio head, H x D (mm)              50 × 200

 Configuration(s) covered by this report           B41K (2600)

 Antenna(s)                                        Four internal antenna branches                 Maximum antenna gain: 4.9 dBi

 Exposure environment                              General public/uncontrolled



In Table 2 nominal output power levels are given.

Table 2       Nominal output power levels.
                                                                                                                       Maximum time-
                               Nominal output          Power                  Transmission         TDD DL duty
  Band        Standard                                                                                                 averaged output
                               power2 [dBm]            tolerance [dB]           loss [dB]          cycle
                                                                                                                       power3
  B41K        NR (TDD)         24                      2                              0            74%                 30.7



The EUT related data in Table 1 and Table 2 were supplied by the client.


4         EMF exposure assessments

FCC procedures [3] specify exposure assessment methods to verify compliance with EMF exposure limits [1]
of mobile devices. A minimum test separation distance of at least 20 cm is required between the device and
nearby persons to apply mobile device exposure limits. The minimum test separation distance for which the
equipment is shown to comply with the exposure limits must be clearly provided in the operating and installation
instructions.


2 Nominal output power per port.
3 Conservative measure of the total maximum possible output power level delivered to the antennas including losses, tolerances, and maximum
downlink/uplink ratio.


                                                                                                                                     4 (9)
GFTL-19:000861 Uen, Rev A, 2019-08-16


The assessments were conducted for maximum power configurations, i.e., by assuming 100% utilization.
Effects of real RBS utilization (time-averaged) is reasonably foreseeable and will significantly reduce the time-
averaged power and the RF exposure. This factor was not considered in this assessment, which adds to the
conservativeness of the obtained compliance boundaries.


4.1          Field strength calculations

The total effective radiated power based on the maximum antenna gain of Table 1 and the output power level
of Table 2 is 2.2 W. As a consequence, the categorical exclusion provision of FCC CFR title 47, § 2.1091(c)
applies [5] and the minimum test separation distance may be estimated by simple calculations according to
plane-wave equivalent conditions [3].

The minimum test separation distance is determined assuming correlated transmit signals. Based on the
maximum gain of the single antenna (๐บant = 4.9 dBi, see Table 1), the directional gain, ๐บ, may be taken as
10.9 dBi according to [4] (๐บ = ๐บant + 10 log10 ๐‘ , where ๐‘ is the number of simultaneously transmitting
antennas). This is most likely a very conservative assumption since the antennas are spatially separated and
their maximum gain occurs at different locations which add extra conservativeness of the results.

    Power density may be conservatively estimated as

                                                                            ๐‘ƒtot ๐บ
                                                                 ๐‘†est =               ,
                                                                           4๐œ‹๐‘Ÿ 2 ๐‘†lim

where

๐‘ƒtot : Total conducted power for the cellular bands4,

๐บ : Directional gain5,

๐‘Ÿ: Separation distance from antenna

๐‘†lim : Power density exposure limit of 10 W/m2,

๐‘†est : Estimated power density.

For a minimum test separation distance of 34 cm (Table 3), the estimated power density complies with the
mobile device exposure conditions and relevant limits applicable in the USA [1]-[3] (see Table 4) for the general
public (uncontrolled exposure).

Table 3        RF exposure assessment results for general public (uncontrolled) exposure as obtained for Dot 4479/4489 B41K
               together with an assumed output power tolerance of 2 dB using procedures applicable for the US market [3].
                                             Nominal output
                                                                                              TDD DL duty   Separation
       Band              Standard            power from the          Test position                                       3GPP band
                                                                                                 cycle       distance
                                                 radio
                                                                      Direction of
       B41K                 NR                  4 x 0.25 W                                       74%          34 cm        B41K
                                                                     maximum gain


Table 4        General public (uncontrolled) RF EMF exposure limits applicable in the US market.

                   Band                           ๐‘บ๐ฅ๐ข๐ฆ (W/m2)
               B41K (2600)                             10




4
    This is equal to the maximum output power (in W) in Error! Reference source not found..
5
    This is equal to linear value of ๐บ.


                                                                                                              5 (9)
GFTL-19:000861 Uen, Rev A, 2019-08-16


5     Conclusion
The results in Section 4 show that the plane-wave equivalent power density for the Ericsson Dot 4479 B41K,
estimated according to the requirements of FCC [3] is below the relevant MPE limits [1] at a separation distance
of at least 34 cm between the equipment and any nearby person.

As Dot 4489 B41K is equipped with the same hardware as Dot 4479 B41K except the antennas, the test results
are also applicable for Dot 4489 connected to external antennas with similar radiation characteristics as the
Dot 4479 antennas.


                                                                                                      6 (9)
GFTL-19:000861 Uen, Rev A, 2019-08-16


6       References

[1]      FCC, Code of Federal Regulations CFR title 47, part 1.1310 “Radiofrequency radiation exposure
         limits”, Federal Communications Commission (FCC), 2017.
[2]      FCC, OET Bulletin 65, “Evaluating compliance with FCC guidelines for human exposure to
         radiofrequency electromagentic fields”, 1997.
[3]      FCC KDB 447498 D01, “Mobile and Portable Devices RF exposure procedures and Equipment
         Authorization Policies”, 2015.
[4]      FCC KDB 662911 D01, “Emissions Testing of Transmitters with Multiple Outputs in the Same Band”,
         2013.
[5]      FCC, Code of Federal Regulations CFR title 47, part 2.1091, “ Radiofrequency radiation exposure
         evaluation: mobile devices”, Federal Communications Commission (FCC), 2017.




7       Revision History

 Rev.        Date              Description

 A           2019-08-16        First revision


                                                                                                                     7 (9)
GFTL-19:000861 Uen, Rev A, 2019-08-16


Appendix A. Information to be included in the CPI
Table A.1 lists the minimum separation distance for which the RF EMF exposure from Dot 4479 B41K and Dot
4489 B41K is below the limits specified by the FCC as applicable in:
- USA (47 CFR 1.1310)


Table A.1: Minimum separation distance for general public/uncontrolled exposure applicable in USA and markets employing
           the FCC RF exposure limits
                                  Nominal output
                                                                         TDD DL duty     Separation
    Band          Standard        power from the      Test position                                     3GPP band
                                                                            cycle         distance
                                         radio
                                                       Direction of
    B41K             NR               4 x 0.25 W                            74%             34 cm          B41K
                                                     maximum gain


Note to the table: The test results were determined for Dot 4479 (equipped with internal antennas) and are
also applicable for Dot 4489 connected to external antennas provided that the antenna gain is equal or
smaller than 4.9 dBi.


                                                                                                      8 (9)
GFTL-19:000861 Uen, Rev A, 2019-08-16


Appendix B. Guidelines on how to install the product
The Ericsson Dot 4479 B41K and Dot 4489 B41K (KRY 901 432/1 and KRY 901 432/2) shall be installed to
make sure that the general public does not have access to the applicable RF EMF compliance boundary. The
compliance boundary dimensions were determined for the product transmitting in free space.


                                                                                           9 (9)
GFTL-19:000861 Uen, Rev A, 2019-08-16




Appendix C. Photographs of the EUT




Figure D.1: Top view on the EUT front side.   Figure D.2: Top view on the EUT back side.



Document Created: 2019-08-16 17:58:38
Document Modified: 2019-08-16 17:58:38

ยฉ 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC