Exhibit 06 EMF Test Report Ericsson RD 4442 B48

FCC ID: TA8AKRY901385-1

RF Exposure Info

Download: PDF
FCCID_3973193

1 (7) GFTB-17:001789 Uen, Rev B, 2017-11-04 Rapport utfärdad av ackrediterat provningslaboratorium Test report issued by an Accredited Testing Laboratory Ackred. Nr 1761 Provning ISO/IEC 17025 EMF Test Report: Ericsson RD 4442 B48 Document number: GFTB-17:001789 Uen, Date of report: 2017-11-04 Rev B Testing laboratory: Ericsson EMF Research Company/Client: Denis Lalonde Laboratory Ericsson Canada Ericsson AB 349 Terry Fox Drive SE-164 80 Stockholm Ottawa ON K2K 2V6 Sweden Canada Tests performed by: Elif Degirmenci Dates of tests: 2017-11-04 (Rev B) Manufacturer and market Ericsson RD 4442 B48 name(s) of device: Testing has been performed FCC CFR title 47, part 1.1310, FCC OET Bulletin 65, in accordance with: FCC KDB447498 D01, Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada RSS 102 Test results: The tested device complies with the requirements in respect of all parameters subject to the test. Additional information: Testing was conducted for mobile exposure conditions Signature: Test Engineer Laboratory Manager ____________________________________ ____________________________________ Elif Degirmenci Christer Törnevik Experienced Researcher Senior Expert – EMF and Health elif.degirmenci@ericsson.com christer.tornevik@ericsson.com Tel: +46 10 717 80 61 Tel: +46 10 714 1235 © Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson AB. This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of the laboratory.

2 (7) GFTB-17:001789 Uen, Rev B, 2017-11-04 1 Summary of EMF Test Report1 Frequency Band [MHz] 3600 Modes LTE Supported  Covered by report  Exposure environment General public 1.1 Results RF exposure assessment results for general public (uncontrolled) exposure applicable in USA [1] - [3] are given in the table below. The equipment under test (EUT) conforms to the requirements of the relevant standards when the combined exposure ratio is less than one. RF exposure assessment results for general public (uncontrolled) exposure as obtained for RD 4442 together with an assumed output power tolerance of 2 dB using procedures applicable for the US market [3]. Nominal output Test separation Exposure 3GPP band Standard power from the Test position Result distance ratio radio Direction of B48 (3600) L 4 x 0.05 W 20 cm 0.4 PASSED maximum gain The maximum EIRP has been found to be 1.87 W which is below the applicable exemption limit for routine evaluations of 3.5 W specified in RSS-102 [4]. As a consequence, for the Canadian market, no RF exposure evaluation is required. 1 This page contains a summary of the test results. The full report provides a complete description of all test details and results.

3 (7) GFTB-17:001789 Uen, Rev B, 2017-11-04 2 General information The test results reported in this document have been obtained by simple calculations according to plane- wave equivalent conditions [3]. The purpose of the tests was to verify that the EUT is in compliance with the appropriate RF exposure standards, recommendations and limits [1] - [4] . 3 Equipment under test Table 1 summarizes the technical data for the EUT. Photographs of the EUT are presented in Appendix A. Table 1 Technical data for the EUT. Product name RD 4442 B48 Product tested KRY 901 385/1 Dimensions, 52 x 140 Thickness x Diameter (mm) Configurations(s) covered by this LTE B48 (3600) report Product number Maximum gain (dBi) Antenna(s) Internal antennas KRE 101 2311/1 3 Transmitter frequency range (MHz) LTE B48 (3600): 3550 - 3700 In Table 2 nominal output power levels are given. Table 2 Nominal output power levels. Nominal Maximum Tolerance, Maximum output output Transmission Band / Mode downlink/uplink upper limit power3 power2 loss ratio (dB) (dBm) (dBm) (dB) LTE B48 (3600) 4 x 0.05 W 74 / 26 17 2 0 23.7 4 EMF exposure assessments FCC procedures [3] specify exposure assessment methods to verify compliance with EMF exposure limits [1] of mobile devices. A minimum test separation distance of at least 20 cm is required between the device and nearby persons to apply mobile device exposure limits. The test separation distance for which the equipment is shown to comply with the exposure limits must be clearly provided in the operating and installation instructions. 2 Nominal output power per port. 3 Conservative measure of the total maximum possible output power level delivered to the antennas including losses, tolerances, and maximum downlink/uplink ratio.

4 (7) GFTB-17:001789 Uen, Rev B, 2017-11-04 4.1 US market – field strength calculations The maximum gain, 𝐺ANT , of the four antenna ports used is 3 dBi (2), see Table 1. Assuming correlated transmit signals, the directional gain, 𝐺, may be taken as 9 dBi, according to [5]. This is most likely a very conservative assumption given the used transmission modes and antenna topology. The total effective radiated power for the antennas is 1.14 W. As a consequence, the categorical exclusion provision of FCC CFR title 47, § 2.1091(c) applies [6] and the minimum test separation distance may be estimated by simple calculations according to plane-wave equivalent conditions [3]. The exposure ratio, 𝐸𝑅, may be conservatively estimated as 𝑆est 𝑃tot 𝐺 𝐸𝑅 = = , 𝑆lim 4𝜋𝑟 2 𝑆lim where 𝑃tot : Total conducted power for the cellular bands (23.7 dBm/0.24 W), 𝐺 : Directional gain (9 dBi), 𝑟: Separation distance from antenna 𝑆lim : Power density exposure limit of 10 W/m2. Setting 𝑃tot = 0.24 W, 𝐺 = 7.94, 𝑟 = 0.20 m and 𝑆lim = 10 W/m2 gives the result for a 20 cm test separation distance in Table 3. Table 3 RF exposure assessment results for general public (uncontrolled) exposure as obtained for the RDS using procedures applicable for the US market [3] Nominal output Test separation Exposure 3GPP band Standard power from the Test position4 Result distance5 ratio radio Direction of B48 (3600) L 4 x 0.05 W 20 cm 0.4 PASSED maximum gain The exposure ratio is well below one. Hence, the RF EMF exposure is below the relevant exposure limits [1] for the 20 cm test separation distance. 4.2 Canadian market – use of exemption limits According to the requirements in RSS-102 [4], in the frequency range at or above 300 MHz and below 6 GHz RF exposure evaluation is not required if the following exemption limit is fulfilled 𝐸𝐼𝑅𝑃 ≤ 0.0131𝑓 0.6834 W, where 𝑓 is the frequency in MHz. With a total conducted power of 23.7 dBm and a maximum directional gain of 9 dBi the maximum 𝐸𝐼𝑅𝑃 = 1.87 W, which is below the exemption limit 𝐸𝐼𝑅𝑃lim = 0.0131 ⋅ 35500.6834 W = 3.5 W. As a consequence, no RF exposure evaluation is required according to the Canadian regulatory requirements [4]. 4 For a test separation distance of 20 cm, the exposure was found to be well below applicable exposure limits in the direction of maximum gain. Since this test position corresponds to the direction of maximum exposure and the RDS is classified as a mobile device with an intended separation distance to the user or nearby persons of at least 20 cm, other test positions were not considered. 5 The separation distance is measured from the EUT casing.

5 (7) GFTB-17:001789 Uen, Rev B, 2017-11-04 5 Conclusion The results in Section 4 show that the plane-wave equivalent power density, estimated according to the requirements of FCC [3] is below the relevant MPE limits [1] at a separation distance of 20 cm between the equipment and any nearby person. The maximum EIRP has been found to be 1.87 W which is less than the applicable exemption limit for routine evaluations of 3.5 W specified in RSS-102 [4]. As a consequence, for the Canadian market, no RF exposure evaluation is required. Consequently, the EUT is in compliance with the appropriate RF exposure standards and recommendations.

6 (7) GFTB-17:001789 Uen, Rev B, 2017-11-04 6 References [1] FCC, Code of Federal Regulations CFR title 47, part 1.1310 “Radiofrequency radiation exposure limits”, Federal Communications Commission (FCC), 2017. [2] FCC, OET Bulletin 65, “Evaluating compliance with FCC guidelines for human exposure to radiofrequency electromagentic fields”, 1997. [3] FCC KDB 447498 D01, “Mobile and Portable Devices RF exposure procedures and Equipment Authorization Policies”, 2015. [4] Innovation, Science, and Economic Development Canada (Industry Canada), Radio Standard Specification (RSS) 102, (Radio Frequency Exposure Compliance of Radiocommunication Apparatus (All Frequency Bands), 2015. [5] FCC KDB 662911 D01, “Emissions Testing of Transmitters with Multiple Outputs in the Same Band”, 2013. [6] FCC, Code of Federal Regulations CFR title 47, part 2.1091, “ Radiofrequency radiation exposure evaluation: mobile devices”, Federal Communications Commission (FCC), 2017. 7 Revision History Rev. Date Description A 2017-11-03 First revision B 2017-11-04 Corrected antenna product number

7 (7) GFTB-17:001789 Uen, Rev B, 2017-11-04 APPENDIX A: Photographs of the EUT (a) (b) (c) Figure A.1 The EUT. (a) Front view. (b) Back view. (c) Sticker.


Document Created: 2017-11-06 10:13:46
Document Modified: 2017-11-06 10:13:46
© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC