MPE Estimates

FCC ID: S9E-RNGRBTWFR

RF Exposure Info

Download: PDF
FCCID_667059

Compliance with 47 CFR 15.247(i)
                 “Systems operating under the provisions of this section shall be operated in a manner that ensures
                 that the public is not exposed to radio frequency energy levels in excess of the Commission's
                 guidelines. See § 1.1307(b)(1) of this chapter.”

The EUT will only be used with a separation distance of 20 centimeters or greater between the antenna and the head or torso of the
user or nearby persons and can therefore be considered a mobile transmitter per 47 CFR 2.1091 (b). The radio module, FCC ID: S9E-
RNGRBTWFR, will be installed in the Recon handheld computer. The 802.11/Bluetooth combo module operates in the 2.4 GHz
band. The radios can transmit simultaneously. Each radio transmits through its own antenna. Two Antenna Factor chip antennas,
M/N: ANT-2.45-CHP-X, will be installed in the Recon for each type of radio transmission, 802.11 and Bluetooth.

The EUT is not subject to routine environmental evaluation per 47 CFR 2.1091. Per 47 CFR 1.1310, the EUT must meet the General
Population / Uncontrolled exposure limits listed in Table 1.

The MPE estimates are as follows:

Table 1 in 47 CFR 1.1310 defines the maximum permissible exposure (MPE) for the general population. The exposure level at a 20
cm distance from the EUT’s transmitting antenna is calculated using the general equation:

                 S = (PG)/4πR2
                 Where: S = power density (mW/cm2)
                 P = power input to the antenna (mW)
                 G = numeric power gain relative to an isotropic radiator
                 R = distance to the center of the radiation of the antenna (20 cm = limit for MPE estimates)
                 PG = EIRP

Solving for S, the maximum power densities 20 cm from the transmitting antennas are summarized in the tables on the following
pages:


FCC ID: S9E-RNGRBTWFR

802.11 (b) Radio

Antenna Type       Antenna Part No.   Transmit    Max Peak    Antenna Gain     Minimum         Power     General   Ratio of Power
                                       (MHz)       (mW)           (dBi)          (dB)        (mW/cm2)   (mW/cm2)
Chip               ANT-2.45-CHP-X       2400        24.6           0.5             0          0.005        1          0.00549

Worst Case Ratio of Power Density to the Exposure Limit =    0.00549

Bluetooth Radio

Antenna Type       Antenna Part No.   Transmit    Max Peak    Antenna Gain     Minimum         Power     General   Ratio of Power
                                       (MHz)       (mW)           (dBi)          (dB)        (mW/cm2)   (mW/cm2)
Chip               ANT-2.45-CHP-X       2400        1.92           0.5             0         0.00043       1          0.00043

Worst Case Ratio of Power Density to the Exposure Limit =    0.00043




Worst Case Co-located Exposure Condition

Per Note 24 shown below, the Sum of Worst Case Power Ratios cannot exceed 1.0


  Bluetooth
                                                               Sum of Worst
    Radio        802.11b Radio
                                                                Case Ratios  FCC Limit for
 Worst Case Worst Case Ratio of
                                                              (Power Density Sum of Worst
Ratio of Power Power Density to the
                                                             to the Exposure Case Ratios
Density to the   Exposure Limit
                                                                  Limit)
Exposure Limit

   0.00043             0.00549                                   0.00592          1.0         PASS


The results shown in the above table are equivalent to the Sum of the EIRP of the Two Co-located Transmitters (EIRP TX1 + EIRP
TX2) compared to the exposure limit. The benefit of this method, is that accounts for transmitters operating at different
frequencies.


Excerpts from TCB Training, April 3, 2002, “Mobile Transmitters”, Slide 6:

         “Devices operating in multiple frequency bands

                  When RF exposure evaluation is required for TCB approval
                     o Separate antennas – estimated minimum separation distances may be considered for the frequency bands
                         that do not require evaluation or TCB approval, however, the estimated distance should take into account
                         the effect of co-located transmitters. (Note 24)

                           Note 24 According to multiple frequency exposure criteria, the ratio of field strength or power density to
                           the applicable exposure limit at the exposure location should be determined for each transmitter and the
                           sum of these ratios must not exceed 1.0 for the location to be compliant.”


The sum of the ratios (power density to the exposure limit) does not exceed 1.0; therefore, the exposure condition is compliant with
FCC rules.



Document Created: 2006-06-06 11:15:04
Document Modified: 2006-06-06 11:15:04

© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC