Test report PCE LTE band 17

FCC ID: RQQHLT-L553TA

Test Report

Download: PDF
FCCID_4484685

Shenzhen Global Test Service Co.,Ltd. No.7-101 and 8A-104, Building 7 and 8, DCC Cultural and Creative Garden, No.98, Pingxin North Road, Shangmugu Community, Pinghu Street, Longgang District, Shenzhen, Guangdong FCC PART 27 TEST REPORT FCC Part 27 Report Reference No. .....................: GTS20190929003-1-3-9 FCC ID. .............................................: RQQHLT-L553TA Compiled by ( position+printed name+signature) .. : File administrators Jimmy Wang Supervised by ( position+printed name+signature) .. : Test Engineer Aaron Tan Approved by ( position+printed name+signature) .. : Manager Jason Hu Date of issue ..................................... : Oct.15,2019 Representative Laboratory Name . : Shenzhen Global Test Service Co.,Ltd. No.7-101 and 8A-104, Building 7 and 8, DCC Cultural and Creative Address ............................................ : Garden, No.98, Pingxin North Road, Shangmugu Community, Pinghu Street, Longgang District, Shenzhen, Guangdong Applicant’s name ............................ : HYUNDAI CORPORATION Address ............................................ : 25,Yulgok-ro 2-Gil, Jongno-gu, Seoul, South Korea Test specification ...........................: FCC CFR Title 47 Part 2, Part 27 Standard ........................................... : EIA/TIA 603-D: 2010 KDB 971168 D01 Shenzhen Global Test Service Co.,Ltd. All rights reserved. This publication may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial purposes as long as the Shenzhen Global Test Service Co.,Ltd. as copyright owner and source of the material. Shenzhen Global Test Service Co.,Ltd.takess no responsibility for and will not assume liability for damages resulting from the reader's interpretation of the reproduced material due to its placement and context. Test item description .....................: Smart Phone Trade Mark ....................................... : HYUNDAI Manufacturer ................................... : Shenzhen Tinno Mobile Technology Corp. Model/Type reference....................... : L553 Listed Models .................................. : N/A Modulation Type ............................... : QPSK, 16QAM LTE Band 2 ........................................ 704~716 MHz ANT Gain ........................................... -1.5dBi Rating ............................................... : DC 3.80V Hardware version ............................. : K510AG20181130 V1.0 Software version .............................. : HYUNDAI_L553_V1.1.2_20190923 Result................................................ : PASS

Report No.: GTS20190929003-1-3-9 Page 2 of 32 TEST REPORT Oct.15,2019 Test Report No. : GTS20190929003-1-3-9 ______________________________________________________________________________________________ Date of issue Equipment under Test : Smart Phone Model /Type : L553 Listed Models : N/A Applicant : HYUNDAI CORPORATION Address : 25,Yulgok-ro 2-Gil, Jongno-gu, Seoul, South Korea Manufacturer : Shenzhen Tinno Mobile Technology Corp. : 4/F.,H-3 Building,OCT Eastern lndustrial Park. NO.1 Address XiangShan East Road.,Nan Shan District,Shenzhen,P.R.China. Test Result: PASS The test report merely corresponds to the test sample. It is not permitted to copy extracts of these test result without the written permission of the test laboratory.

Report No.: GTS20190929003-1-3-9 Page 3 of 32 Contents 1. TEST STANDARDS ................................................................. 4 2. SUMMARY ............................................................................ 5 2.1. General Remarks 5 2.2. Equipment under Test 5 2.3. Short description of the Equipment under Test (EUT) 5 2.4. EUT configuration 5 2.5. Related Submittal(s) / Grant (s) 5 2.6. Modifications 5 2.7. Test Environment 5 3. TEST ENVIRONMENT .............................................................. 6 3.1. Address of the test laboratory 6 3.2. Test Facility 6 3.3. Environmental conditions 6 3.4. Test Description 6 3.5. Equipments Used during the Test 7 4. TEST CONDITIONS AND RESULTS............................................. 8 4.1. Output Power 8 4.2. Peak-to-Average Ratio (PAR) 12 4.3. Occupied Bandwidth and Emission Bandwidth 13 4.4. Band Edge compliance 16 4.5. Spurious Emssion on Antenna Port 19 4.6. Radiated Spurious Emssion 26 4.7. Frequency Stability under Temperature & Voltage Variations 30 5. TEST SETUP PHOTOS OF THE EUT ......................................... 32 6. EXTERNAL AND INTERNAL PHOTOS OF THE EUT ...................... 32

Report No.: GTS20190929003-1-3-9 Page 4 of 32 1. TEST STANDARDS The tests were performed according to following standards: FCC Part 27(10-1-12 Edition): MISCELLANEOUS WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES TIA/EIA 603 D June 2010: Land Mobile FM or PM Communications Equipment Measurement and Performance Standards. 47 CFR FCC Part 15 Subpart B: - Unintentional Radiators FCC Part 2: FREQUENCY ALLOCA-TIONS AND RADIO TREATY MAT-TERS; GENERAL RULES AND REG-ULATIONS ANSI C63.4:2009: Methods of Measurement of Radio-Noise Emissions from Low-Voltage Electrical and Electronic Equipment in the Range of 9 kHz to 40 GHz FCCKDB971168D01 Power Meas License Digital Systems

Report No.: GTS20190929003-1-3-9 Page 5 of 32 2. SUMMARY 2.1. General Remarks Date of receipt of test sample : Sep.15, 2019 Testing commenced on : Sep.15, 2019 Testing concluded on : Oct.15, 2019 2.2. Equipment under Test Power supply system utilised Power supply voltage : ○ 120V / 60 Hz ○ 115V / 60Hz ○ 12 V DC ○ 24 V DC ● Other (specified in blank below) DC 3.80V 2.3. Short description of the Equipment under Test (EUT) This is a Smart Phone . For more details, refer to the user’s manual of the EUT. 2.4. EUT configuration The following peripheral devices and interface cables were connected during the measurement: ● - supplied by the manufacturer ○ - supplied by the lab ○ / M/N : / Manufacturer: / 2.5. Related Submittal(s) / Grant (s) This submittal(s) (test report) is intended forFCC ID: RQQHLT-L553TAfiling to comply with FCC Part 27, Rules. 2.6. Modifications No modifications were implemented to meet testing criteria. 2.7. Test Environment EnvironmentParameter SelectedValuesDuringTests Relative Humidity Ambient Temperature TN Ambient VL 3.40V Voltage VN 3.80V VH 4.20V NOTE:VL=lowerextreme testvoltageVN=nominalvoltage VH=upperextreme testvoltageTN=normaltemperature

Report No.: GTS20190929003-1-3-9 Page 6 of 32 3. TEST ENVIRONMENT 3.1. Address of the test laboratory Shenzhen Global Test Service Co.,Ltd. Electronic Testing Building, Shahe Road，Xili, Nanshan District,Shenzhen, 518055, P. R. China The sites are constructed in conformance with the requirements of ANSI C63.7, ANSI C63.4 (2003) and CISPR Publication 22. 3.2. Test Facility The test facility is recognized, certified, or accredited by the following organizations: FCC-Registration No.: 406086 Shenzhen Global Test Service Co.,Ltd.EMC Laboratory has been registered and fully described in a report filed with the FCC (Federal Communications Commission). The acceptance letter fr om the FCC is maintained in our files. Registration 406086, valid time is until October 28, 2017. 3.3. Environmental conditions During the measurement the environmental conditions were within the listed ranges: Temperature: 15-35 °C Humidity: 30-60 % Atmospheric pressure: 950-1050mbar 3.4. Test Description 3.4.1 AWS Band (1710-1755MHz pairedwith 2110-2155MHz) Test Item FCC Rule Requirements Verdict No. Effective (Isotropic) §2.1046, Pass EIRP ≤ 1W; Radiated Output Power §27.50(d) §2.1046, Peak-Average Ratio Limit≤13dB Pass §27.50(d) Modulation §2.1047 Digital modulation N/A Characteristics OBW: No limit. Pass Bandwidth §2.1049 EBW: No limit. ≤ -13dBm/1%*EBW,in1MHz bands immediately outside Pass Band Edges §2.1051, and adjacent to Compliance §27.53(h) The frequency block. Spurious Emission at §2.1051, ≤ -13dBm/1MHz, from 9kHz to 10th harmonics but outside Pass Antenna Terminals §27.53(h) authorized operating frequency ranges. Field Strength of Pass §2.1055, Within authorized bands of Spurious §27.54 operation/frequency block. Radiation §2.1053, Pass Frequency Stability ≤ -13dBm/1MHz. §27.53(h) NOTE 1: For the verdict, the “N/A” denotes “not applicable”, the “N/T” de notes “not tested”.

Report No.: GTS20190929003-1-3-9 Page 7 of 32 3.5. Equipments Used during the Test Calibration Calibration Test Equipment Manufacturer Model No. Serial No. Date Due Date LISN R&S ENV216 3560.6550.08 2019/09/20 2020/09/19 LISN R&S ESH2-Z5 893606/008 2019/09/20 2020/09/19 Bilog Antenna Schwarzbeck VULB9163 976 2019/09/20 2020/09/19 Bilog Antenna Schwarzbeck VULB9163 979 2019/09/20 2020/09/19 EMI Test Receiver R&S ESCI7 101102 2019/09/20 2020/09/19 Spectrum Analyzer Agilent N9020A MY48010425 2019/09/20 2020/09/19 Spectrum Analyzer R&S FSP40 100019 2019/09/20 2020/09/19 Controller EM Controller EM Electronics N/A N/A N/A 1000 Horn Antenna Schwarzbeck BBHA 9120D 01622 2019/09/20 2020/09/19 Horn Antenna Schwarzbeck BBHA 9120D 01652 2019/09/20 2020/09/19 Active Loop SCHWARZBEC FMZB1519 1519-037 2019/09/20 2020/09/19 Antenna K Broadband Horn SCHWARZBEC BBHA 9170 971 2019/09/20 2020/09/19 Antenna K Amplifier Schwarzbeck BBV 9743 #202 2019/09/20 2020/09/19 Amplifier EMCI EMC051845B 980355 2019/09/20 2020/09/19 Temperature/Humidi Gangxing CTH-608 02 2019/09/20 2020/09/19 ty Meter 9SH10- High-Pass Filter K&L 2700/X12750- KL142031 2019/09/20 2020/09/19 O/O 41H10- High-Pass Filter K&L 1375/U12750- KL142032 2019/09/20 2020/09/19 O/O RF Cable(below HUBER+SUHNE RG214 RE01 2019/09/20 2020/09/19 1GHz) R RF Cable(above HUBER+SUHNE RG214 RE02 2019/09/20 2020/09/19 1GHz) R Data acquisition Agilent U2531A TW53323507 2019/09/20 2020/09/19 card Power Sensor Agilent U2021XA MY5365004 2019/09/20 2020/09/19 EMI Test Software R&S ES-K1 V1.7.1 2019/09/20 2020/09/19 EMI Test Software JS Tonscend JS32-RE 2.0.1.5 2019/09/20 2020/09/19 EMI Test Software Audix E3 2..1.1 2019/09/20 2020/09/19 The calibration interval was one year.

Report No.: GTS20190929003-1-3-9 Page 8 of 32 4. TEST CONDITIONS AND RESULTS 4.1. Output Power LIMIT According to §27.50 (d) (4): Fixed, mobile, and portable (hand- held) stations operating in the 704–716 MHz band are limited to 1 watt EIRP TEST APPLICABLE During the process of testing, the EUT was controlled via R&S Digital Radio Communication tester (CMW500) to ensure max power transmission and proper modulation. This result contains output power and EIRP measurements for the EUT. In all cases, output power is within the specified limits 4.1.1. Conducted Output Power TEST CONFIGURATION TEST PROCEDURE Conducted Power Measurement: a) Place the EUT on a bench and set it in transmitting mode. b) Connect a low loss RF cable from the antenna port to a CMW500 by an Att. c) EUT Communicate with CMW500 then selects a channel for testing. d) Add a correction factor to the display CMW500, and then test. TEST RESULTS Remark: 1. We were tested all RB Configuration refer 3GPP TS136 521 for each Channel Bandwidth of LTE FDD Band 17; LTE FDD Band 17 TX Channel Frequency Average Power [dBm] RB Size/Offset Bandwidth (MHz) QPSK 16QAM 1 RB low 23.52 22.55 1 RB Mid 23.36 22.46 1 RB high 23.47 22.57 706.5 50% RB Low 22.73 21.79 50% RB mid 22.73 21.79 50% RB high 22.59 21.56 100% RB 22.31 21.46 1 RB low 23.35 22.39 5 MHz 1 RB Mid 23.53 22.57 1 RB high 23.49 22.43 710 50% RB Low 22.63 21.71 50% RB mid 22.67 21.75 50% RB high 22.60 21.56 100% RB 22.16 21.28 1 RB low 23.42 22.56 713.5 1 RB Mid 23.35 22.51

Report No.: GTS20190929003-1-3-9 Page 9 of 32 1 RB high 23.38 22.45 50% RB Low 22.57 21.61 50% RB mid 22.69 21.76 50% RB high 22.44 21.50 100% RB 22.21 21.33 1 RB low 23.60 22.66 1 RB Mid 23.50 22.48 1 RB high 23.68 22.71 709 50% RB Low 22.81 21.84 50% RB mid 22.79 21.84 50% RB high 22.79 21.86 100% RB 22.29 21.30 1 RB low 23.64 22.69 1 RB Mid 23.61 21.95 1 RB high 23.77 22.67 10 MHz 710 50% RB Low 22.92 21.99 50% RB mid 22.83 21.91 50% RB high 22.99 21.94 100% RB 22.42 21.55 1 RB low 23.63 22.70 1 RB Mid 23.31 22.43 1 RB high 23.55 22.62 711 50% RB Low 22.73 21.67 50% RB mid 22.83 21.89 50% RB high 22.64 21.59 100% RB 22.27 21.41

Report No.: GTS20190929003-1-3-9 Page 10 of 32 4.1.2. Radiated Output Power LIMIT According to §27.50 (d) (4): Fixed, mobile, and portable (hand- held) stations operating in the 704–716 MHz band are limited to 1 watt EIRP. TEST CONFIGURATION TEST PROCEDURE 1. EUT was placed on a 0.80 meter high non-conductive stand at a 3 meter test distance from the receive antenna. A receiving antenna was placed on the antenna mast 3 meters from the EUT for emission measurements. The height of receiving antenna is 0.80m. Detected emissions were maximized at each frequency by rotating the EUT through 360°and adjusting the receiving antenna polarization. The radiated emission measurements of all transmit frequencies in three channels (High, Middle, Low) were measured with peak detector. 2. A log-periodic antenna or double-ridged waveguide horn antenna shall be substituted in place of the EUT. The log-periodic antenna will be driven by a signal generator and the level will be adjusted till the same power value on the spectrum analyzer or receiver. The level of the spurious emissions can be calculated through the level of the signal generator, cable loss, the gain of the substitution antenna and the reading of the spectrum analyzer or receiver. 3. The EUT is then put into continuously transmitting mode at its maximum power level during the test.Set Test Receiver or Spectrum RBW=1MHz,VBW=3MHz, And the maximum value of the receiver should be recorded as (Pr). 4. The EUT shall be replaced by a substitution antenna. In the chamber, an substitution antenna for the frequency band of interest is placed at the reference point of the chamber. An RF Signal source for the frequency band of interest is connected to the substitution antenna with a cable that has been constructed to not interfere with the radiation pattern of the antenna. A power (PMea) is applied to the input of the substitution antenna, and adjust the level of the signal generator output until the value of the receiver reach the previously recorded (Pr). The power of signal source (PMea) is recorded. The test should be performed by rotating the test item and adjusting the receiving antenna polarization.

Report No.: GTS20190929003-1-3-9 Page 11 of 32 5. A amplifier should be connected to the Signal Source output port. And the cable should be connect between the Amplifier and the Substitution Antenna. The cable loss (Pcl) ,the Substitution Antenna Gain (Ga) and the Amplifier Gain (PAg) should be recorded after test. The measurement results are obtained as described below: Power(EIRP)=PMea- PAg - Pcl + Ga We used SMF100A micowave signal generator which signal level can up to 33dBm,so we not used power Amplifier for substituation test; The measurement results are amend as described below: Power(EIRP)=PMea- Pcl + Ga 6. This value is EIRP since the measurement is calibrated using an antenna of known gain (2.15 dBi) and known input power. 7. ERP can be calculated from EIRP by subtracting the gain of the dipole, ERP = EIRP-2.15dBi. TEST RESULTS Note: We test the H direction and V direction and V direction is worse. Remark: 2. We were tested all RB Configuration refer 3GPP TS136 521 for each Channel Bandwidth of LTE FDD Band 17recorded worst case for each Channel Bandwidth of LTE FDD Band 17 3. EIRP=PMea(dBm)-Pcl(dB)+PAg(dB)+Ga(dBi) LTE FDD Band 17_Channel Bandwidth 5MHz_QPSK Ga Frequency PMea Pcl PAg EIRP Limit Margin Antenna Polarization (MHz) (dBm) (dB) (dB) (dBm) (dBm) (dB) Gain(dB) 706.5 -20.14 2.42 8.24 33.54 19.22 30 10.78 H 710 -19.01 2.42 8.24 33.54 20.35 30 9.65 H 713.5 -19.62 2.42 8.24 33.54 19.74 30 10.26 H LTE FDD Band 17_Channel Bandwidth 10MHz_QPSK Ga Frequency PMea Pcl PAg EIRP Limit Margin Antenna Polarization (MHz) (dBm) (dB) (dB) (dBm) (dBm) (dB) Gain(dB) 709 -20.25 2.42 8.24 33.54 19.11 30 10.89 H 710 -18.98 2.42 8.24 33.54 20.38 30 9.62 H 711 -19.83 2.42 8.24 33.54 19.53 30 10.47 H LTE FDD Band 17_Channel Bandwidth 5MHz_16QAM Ga Frequency PMea Pcl PAg EIRP Limit Margin Antenna Polarization (MHz) (dBm) (dB) (dB) (dBm) (dBm) (dB) Gain(dB) 706.5 -20.22 2.42 8.24 33.54 19.14 30 10.86 H 710 -19.44 2.42 8.24 33.54 19.92 30 10.08 H 713.5 -20.08 2.42 8.24 33.54 19.28 30 10.72 H LTE FDD Band 17_Channel Bandwidth 10MHz_16QAM Ga Frequency PMea Pcl PAg EIRP Limit Margin Antenna Polarization (MHz) (dBm) (dB) (dB) (dBm) (dBm) (dB) Gain(dB) 709 -20.25 2.42 8.24 33.54 19.11 30 10.89 H 710 -19.97 2.42 8.24 33.54 19.39 30 10.61 H 711 -20.29 2.42 8.24 33.54 19.07 30 10.93 H

Report No.: GTS20190929003-1-3-9 Page 12 of 32 4.2. Peak-to-Average Ratio (PAR) LIMIT The Peak-to-Average Ratio (PAR) of the transmission may not exceed 13 dB. TEST CONFIGURATION TEST PROCEDURE 1. Refer to instrument’s analyzer instruction manual for details on how to use the power statistics/CCDF function; 2. Set resolution/measurement bandwidth ≥ signal’s occupied bandwidth; 3. Set the number of counts to a value that stabilizes the measured CCDF curve; 4. Set the measurement interval as follows: 1). for continuous transmissions, set to 1 ms, 2). for burst transmissions, employ an external trigger that is synchronized with the EUT burst timing sequence, or use the internal burst trigger with a trigger level that allows the burst to stabilize and set the measurement interval to a time that is less than or equal to the burst duration. 5. Record the maximum PAPR level associated with a probability of 0.1%. TEST RESULTS Remark: 1. We were tested all RB Configuration refer 3GPP TS136 521 for each Channel Bandwidth of LTE FDD Band 17; recorded worst case for each Channel Bandwidth of LTE FDD Band 17. LTE FDD Band 17 TX Channel Frequency PAPR (dB) RB Size/Offset Bandwidth (MHz) QPSK 16QAM 706.5 2.75 2.69 5 MHz 710 1RB#0 2.69 2.85 713.5 2.85 2.91 709 3.97 4.13 10 MHz 710 1RB#0 3.86 4.21 711 3.79 4.18

Report No.: GTS20190929003-1-3-9 Page 13 of 32 4.3. Occupied Bandwidth and Emission Bandwidth LIMIT N/A TEST CONFIGURATION TEST PROCEDURE The transmitter output was connected to a calibrated coaxial cable and coupler, the other end of which was connected to a spectrum analyzer. The occupied bandwidth was measured with the spectrum analyzer at low, middle and high channel in each band. The -26dBc Emission bandwidth was also measured and recorded. Set RBW was set to about 1% of emission BW, VBW≥3 times RBW. -26dBc display line was placed on the screen (or 99% bandwidth), the occupied bandwidth is the delta frequency between the two points where the display line intersects the signal trace. TEST RESULTS Remark: 1. We were tested all RB Configuration refer 3GPP TS136 521 for each Channel Bandwidth of LTE FDD Band 17; recorded worst case for each Channel Bandwidth of LTE FDD Band 17. LTE FDD Band 17 TX -26dBc Emission 99% Occupied bandwidth Frequency Channel RB Size/Offset bandwidth (MHz) (MHz) (MHz) Bandwidth QPSK 16QAM QPSK 16QAM 706.5 5.300 5.160 4.5355 4.5155 5 MHz 25RB#0 710 5.240 5.150 4.5355 4.5255 713.5 5.210 5.320 4.5155 4.5455 709 10.233 10.133 9.0183 9.0183 10 MHz 50RB#0 710 10.300 10.233 9.0516 9.0183 711 10.167 10.300 8.9850 9.0183

Report No.: GTS20190929003-1-3-9 Page 14 of 32 LTE FDD Band 7-5MHz Channel Bandwidth QPSK 16QAM 25RB#0 25RB#0 Low Channel 25RB#0 25RB#0 Middle Channel 25RB#0 25RB#0 High Channel

Report No.: GTS20190929003-1-3-9 Page 15 of 32 LTE FDD Band 7-10MHz Channel Bandwidth QPSK 16QAM 50RB#0 50RB#0 Low Channel 50RB#0 50RB#0 Middle Channel 50RB#0 50RB#0 High Channel

Report No.: GTS20190929003-1-3-9 Page 16 of 32 4.4. Band Edge compliance LIMIT According to §27.53 (h): For operations in the 704–716 MHz, the power of any emission outside a licensee’s frequency block shall be attenuated below the transmitter power (P) by at least 43 + 10 log10(P) dB. TEST CONFIGURATION TEST PROCEDURE 1. The transmitter output port was connected to base station. 2. The RF output of EUT was connected to the power meter by RF cable and attenuator, the path loss was compensated to the results for each measurement. 3. Set EUT at maximum power through base station. 4. Select lowest and highest channels for each band and different modulation. 5. Measure Band edge using RMS (Average) detector by spectrum TEST RESULTS Remark: 1. We were tested all RB Configuration refer 3GPP TS136 521 for each Channel Bandwidth of LTE FDD Band 17; recorded worst case for each Channel Bandwidth of LTE FDD Band 17.

Report No.: GTS20190929003-1-3-9 Page 17 of 32 LTE FDD Band 17-5MHz Channel Bandwidth Band Edge Compliance QPSK 16QAM 25 RB#0 25 RB#0 Low Channel 25 RB#0 25 RB#0 High Channel

Report No.: GTS20190929003-1-3-9 Page 18 of 32 LTE FDD Band 17-10MHz Channel Bandwidth Band Edge Compliance QPSK 16QAM 50 RB#0 50 RB#0 Low Channel 50 RB#0 50 RB#0 High Channel

Report No.: GTS20190929003-1-3-9 Page 19 of 32 4.5. Spurious Emssion on Antenna Port LIMIT According to §27.53 (h): For operations in the 704–716 MHz bands, the power of any emission outside a licensee’s frequency block shall be attenuated below the transmitter power (P) by at least 43 + 10 log10(P) dB. TEST CONFIGURATION TEST PROCEDURE The EUT was setup according to EIA/TIA 603D a. Place the EUT on a bench and set it in transmitting mode. b. Connect a low loss RF cable from the antenna port to a spectrum analyzer and CMW500 by a Directional Couple. c. EUT Communicate with CMW500, then select a channel for testing. d. Add a correction factor to the display of spectrum, and then test. e. The resolution bandwidth of the spectrum analyzer was set sufficient scans were taken to show the out of band Emission if any up to10th harmonic. f. Please refer to following tables for test antenna conducted emissions Working Sub range Sweep time RBW VBW Frequency (GHz) (s) 0.000009~0.000015 1KHz 3KHz Auto LTE FDD Band 17 0.000015~0.03 10KHz 30KHz Auto 0.03~26.5 1 MHz 3 MHz Auto TEST RESULTS Remark: 1. We were tested all RB Configuration refer 3GPP TS136 521 for each Channel Bandwidth of LTE FDD Band 17; recorded worst case for each Channel Bandwidth of LTE FDD Band 17.

Report No.: GTS20190929003-1-3-9 Page 20 of 32 LTE FDD Band 17-5MHz Channel Bandwidth Low Channel QPSK 9KHz~150KHz 150KHz~30MHz 30MHz~1GHz 1GHz ~5 GHz 1GHz ~12GHz 12GHz~26.5GHz 1RB#0 1RB#0

Report No.: GTS20190929003-1-3-9 Page 21 of 32 LTE FDD Band 17-5MHz Channel Bandwidth Middle Channel QPSK 9KHz~150KHz 150KHz~30MHz 30MHz~1GHz 1GHz ~5 GHz 1GHz ~12GHz 12GHz~26.5GHz QPSK 1RB#0

Report No.: GTS20190929003-1-3-9 Page 22 of 32 LTE FDD Band 17-5MHz Channel Bandwidth High Channel QPSK 9KHz~150KHz 150KHz~30MHz 30MHz~1GHz 1GHz ~5 GHz 1GHz ~12GHz 12GHz~26.5GHz 1RB#0 1RB#0

Report No.: GTS20190929003-1-3-9 Page 23 of 32 LTE FDD Band 17-10 MHz Channel Bandwidth Low Channel QPSK 9KHz~150KHz 150KHz~30MHz 30MHz~1GHz 1GHz ~5 GHz 1GHz ~12GHz 12GHz~26.5GHz 1RB#0 1RB#0

Report No.: GTS20190929003-1-3-9 Page 24 of 32 LTE FDD Band 17-10 MHz Channel Bandwidth Middle Channel QPSK 9KHz~150KHz 150KHz~30MHz 30MHz~1GHz 1GHz ~5 GHz 1GHz ~12GHz 12GHz~26.5GHz 1RB#0 1RB#0

Report No.: GTS20190929003-1-3-9 Page 25 of 32 LTE FDD Band 17-10 MHz Channel Bandwidth High Channel QPSK 9KHz~150KHz 150KHz~30MHz 30MHz~1GHz 1GHz ~5 GHz 1GHz ~12GHz 12GHz~26.5GHz 1RB#0 1RB#0

Report No.: GTS20190929003-1-3-9 Page 26 of 32 4.6. Radiated Spurious Emssion LIMIT According to §27.53 (h): For operations in the 704–716 MHz MHz bands, the power of any emission outside a licensee’s frequency block shall be attenuated below the transmitter power (P) by at least 43 + 10 log10(P) dB. TEST CONFIGURATION TEST PROCEDURE 1. EUT was placed on a 0.80 meter high non-conductive stand at a 3 meter test distance from the receive antenna. A receiving antenna was placed on the antenna mast 3 meters from the EUT for emission measurements. The height of receiving antenna is 0.80m. Detected emissions were maximized at each frequency by rotating the EUT through 360°and adjusting the receiving antenna polarization. The radiated emission measurements of all transmit frequencies in three channels (High, Middle, Low) were measured with peak detector. 2. A log-periodic antenna or double-ridged waveguide horn antenna shall be substituted in place of the EUT. The log-periodic antenna will be driven by a signal generator and the level will be adjusted till the same power value on the spectrum analyzer or receiver. The level of the spurious emissions can be calculated through the level of the signal generator, cable loss, the gain of the substitution antenna and the reading of the spectrum analyzer or receiver. 3. The EUT is then put into continuously transmitting mode at its maximum power level during the test.Set Test Receiver or Spectrum RBW=1MHz,VBW=3MHz, And the maximum value of the receiver should be recorded as (Pr).

Report No.: GTS20190929003-1-3-9 Page 27 of 32 4. The EUT shall be replaced by a substitution antenna. In the chamber, an substitution antenna for the frequency band of interest is placed at the reference point of the chamber. An RF Signal source for the frequency band of interest is connected to the substitution antenna with a cable that has been constructed to not interfere with the radiation pattern of the antenna. A power (PMea) is applied to the input of the substitution antenna, and adjust the level of the signal generator output until the value of the receiver reach the previously recorded (Pr). The power of signal source (PMea) is recorded. The test should be performed by rotating the test item and adjusting the receiving antenna polarization. 5. A amplifier should be connected to the Signal Source output port. And the cable should be connect between the Amplifier and the Substitution Antenna. The cable loss (Pcl) ,the Substitution Antenna Gain (Ga) and the Amplifier Gain (PAg) should be recorded after test. The measurement results are obtained as described below: Power(EIRP)=PMea- PAg - Pcl + Ga 6. This value is EIRP since the measurement is calibrated using an antenna of known gain (2.15 dBi) and known input power. 7. ERP can be calculated from EIRP by subtracting the gain of the dipole, ERP = EIRP -2.15dBi. 8. In order to make sure test results more clearly,we set frequency range and sweep time for difference frequency range as follows table: Working Subrange Sweep time RBW VBW Frequency (GHz) (s) 0.00009~0.15 1KHz 3KHz 30 0.00015~0.03 10KHz 30KHz 10 0.03~1 100KHz 300KHz 10 LTE FDD Band 17 1~2 1 MHz 3 MHz 2 2~5 1 MHz 3 MHz 3 5~8 1 MHz 3 MHz 3 Remark: 1. We were tested all RB Configuration refer 3GPP TS136 521 for each Channel Bandwidth of LTE FDD Band 17; recorded worst case for each Channel Bandwidth of LTE FDD Band 17. 2. EIRP=PMea(dBm)-Pcl(dB) +Ga(dBi) 3. We were not recorded other points as values lower than limits. 4. Margin = Limit - EIRP LTE FDD Band 17_Channel Bandwidth 5MHz_QPSK_ Low Channel Ga Peak Frequency PMea Pcl Limit Margin Diatance Antenna EIRP Polarization (MHz) (dBm) (dB) (dBm) (dB) Gain(dB) (dBm) 1413 -44.12 2.98 3 8.68 -38.42 -13.00 25.42 H 2118.9 -48.49 3.65 3 10.52 -41.62 -13.00 28.62 H 1413 -46.16 2.98 3 8.68 -40.46 -13.00 27.46 V 2118.9 -51.51 3.65 3 10.52 -44.64 -13.00 31.64 V LTE FDD Band 17_Channel Bandwidth 5MHz_QPSK_ Middle Channel Ga Frequency PMea Pcl EIRP Limit Margin Diatance Antenna Polarization (MHz) (dBm) (dB) (dBm) (dBm) (dB) Gain(dB) 1420 -41.46 2.98 3 8.68 -35.76 -13.00 22.76 H 2130 -45.82 3.65 3 10.52 -38.95 -13.00 25.95 H 1420 -50.03 2.98 3 8.68 -44.33 -13.00 31.33 V 2130 -53.06 3.65 3 10.52 -46.19 -13.00 33.19 V LTE FDD Band 17_Channel Bandwidth 5MHz_QPSK_ High Channel Ga Frequency PMea Pcl EIRP Limit Margin Diatance Antenna Polarization (MHz) (dBm) (dB) (dBm) (dBm) (dB) Gain(dB) 1427 -43.94 2.98 3 8.68 -38.24 -13.00 25.24 H 2140.5 -47.20 3.65 3 10.52 -40.33 -13.00 27.33 H 1427 -46.29 2.98 3 8.68 -40.59 -13.00 27.59 V 2140.5 -52.06 3.65 3 10.52 -45.19 -13.00 32.19 V

Report No.: GTS20190929003-1-3-9 Page 28 of 32 LTE FDD Band 17_Channel Bandwidth 10MHz_QPSK_ Low Channel Ga Peak Frequency PMea Pcl Limit Margin Diatance Antenna EIRP Polarization (MHz) (dBm) (dB) (dBm) (dB) Gain(dB) (dBm) 1418 -46.68 2.98 3 8.68 -40.98 -13.00 27.98 H 2127 -50.30 3.65 3 10.52 -43.43 -13.00 30.43 H 1418 -51.81 2.98 3 8.68 -46.11 -13.00 33.11 V 2127 -54.36 3.65 3 10.52 -47.49 -13.00 34.49 V LTE FDD Band 17_Channel Bandwidth 10MHz_QPSK_ Middle Channel Ga Frequency PMea Pcl EIRP Limit Margin Diatance Antenna Polarization (MHz) (dBm) (dB) (dBm) (dBm) (dB) Gain(dB) 1420 -45.45 2.98 3 8.68 -39.75 -13.00 26.75 H 2130 -49.38 3.65 3 10.52 -42.51 -13.00 29.51 H 1420 -46.04 2.98 3 8.68 -40.34 -13.00 27.34 V 2130 -53.80 3.65 3 10.52 -46.93 -13.00 33.93 V LTE FDD Band 17_Channel Bandwidth 10MHz_QPSK_ High Channel Ga Frequency PMea Pcl EIRP Limit Margin Diatance Antenna Polarization (MHz) (dBm) (dB) (dBm) (dBm) (dB) Gain(dB) 1422 -45.94 2.98 3 8.68 -40.24 -13.00 27.24 H 2133 -49.60 3.65 3 10.52 -42.73 -13.00 29.73 H 1422 -45.48 2.98 3 8.68 -39.78 -13.00 26.78 V 2133 -50.47 3.65 3 10.52 -43.60 -13.00 30.60 V LTE FDD Band 17_Channel Bandwidth 5MHz_16QAM _ Low Channel Ga Peak Frequency PMea Pcl Limit Margin Diatance Antenna EIRP Polarization (MHz) (dBm) (dB) (dBm) (dB) Gain(dB) (dBm) 1413 -42.67 2.98 3 8.68 -36.97 -13.00 23.97 H 2118.9 -49.49 3.65 3 10.52 -42.62 -13.00 29.62 H 1413 -43.48 2.98 3 8.68 -37.78 -13.00 24.78 V 2118.9 -52.06 3.65 3 10.52 -45.19 -13.00 32.19 V LTE FDD Band 17_Channel Bandwidth 5MHz_16QAM _ Middle Channel Ga Frequency PMea Pcl EIRP Limit Margin Diatance Antenna Polarization (MHz) (dBm) (dB) (dBm) (dBm) (dB) Gain(dB) 1413 -43.06 2.98 3 8.68 -37.36 -13.00 24.36 H 2118.9 -48.78 3.65 3 10.52 -41.91 -13.00 28.91 H 1413 -41.02 2.98 3 8.68 -35.32 -13.00 22.32 V 2118.9 -49.66 3.65 3 10.52 -42.79 -13.00 29.79 V LTE FDD Band 17_Channel Bandwidth 5MHz_16QAM _ High Channel Ga Frequency PMea Pcl EIRP Limit Margin Diatance Antenna Polarization (MHz) (dBm) (dB) (dBm) (dBm) (dB) Gain(dB) 1427 -43.48 2.98 3 8.68 -37.78 -13.00 24.78 H 2140.5 -47.92 3.65 3 10.52 -41.05 -13.00 28.05 H 1427 -45.48 2.98 3 8.68 -39.78 -13.00 26.78 V 2140.5 -52.33 3.65 3 10.52 -45.46 -13.00 32.46 V LTE FDD Band 17_Channel Bandwidth 10MHz_16QAM _ Low Channel Ga Peak Frequency PMea Pcl Limit Margin Diatance Antenna EIRP Polarization (MHz) (dBm) (dB) (dBm) (dB) Gain(dB) (dBm) 1427 -44.46 2.98 3 8.68 -38.76 -13.00 25.76 H 2140.5 -50.63 3.65 3 10.52 -43.76 -13.00 30.76 H 1427 -45.66 2.98 3 8.68 -39.96 -13.00 26.96 V 2140.5 -55.44 3.65 3 10.52 -48.57 -13.00 35.57 V

Report No.: GTS20190929003-1-3-9 Page 29 of 32 LTE FDD Band 17_Channel Bandwidth 10MHz_16QAM _ Middle Channel Ga Frequency PMea Pcl EIRP Limit Margin Diatance Antenna Polarization (MHz) (dBm) (dB) (dBm) (dBm) (dB) Gain(dB) 1413 -45.27 2.98 3 8.68 -39.57 -13.00 26.57 H 2118.9 -50.53 3.65 3 10.52 -43.66 -13.00 30.66 H 1413 -46.04 2.98 3 8.68 -40.34 -13.00 27.34 V 2118.9 -51.21 3.65 3 10.52 -44.34 -13.00 31.34 V LTE FDD Band 17_Channel Bandwidth 10MHz_16QAM _ High Channel Ga Frequency PMea Pcl EIRP Limit Margin Diatance Antenna Polarization (MHz) (dBm) (dB) (dBm) (dBm) (dB) Gain(dB) 1427 -44.52 2.98 3 8.68 -38.82 -13.00 25.82 H 2140.5 -49.55 3.65 3 10.52 -42.68 -13.00 29.68 H 1427 -46.56 2.98 3 8.68 -40.86 -13.00 27.86 V 2140.5 -51.06 3.65 3 10.52 -44.19 -13.00 31.19 V

Report No.: GTS20190929003-1-3-9 Page 30 of 32 4.7. Frequency Stability under Temperature & Voltage Variations LIMIT According to §27.54, §2.1055 requirement, the frequency stability shall be sufficient to ensure that the fundamental emissions stay within the authorized bands of operation and should not exceed 2.5ppm. TEST CONFIGURATION TEST PROCEDURE The EUT was setup according to EIA/TIA 603D Frequency Stability Under Temperature Variations: In order to measure the carrier frequency under the condition of AFC lock, it is necessary to make measurements with the EUT in a “call mode”. This is accomplished with the use of R&S CMW500 DIGITAL RADIO COMMUNICATION TESTER. 1. Measure the carrier frequency at room temperature. 2. Subject the EUT to overnight soak at -30℃. 3. With the EUT, powered via nominal voltage, connected to the CMW500 and in a simulated call on middle channel for LTE band 4, measure the carrier frequency. These measurements should be made within 2 minutes of Powering up the EUT, to prevent significant self-warming. 4. Repeat the above measurements at 10℃ increments from -30℃ to +50℃. Allow at least 1.5 hours at each temperature, unpowered, before making measurements. 5. Re-measure carrier frequency at room temperature with nominal voltage. Vary supply voltage from minimum voltage to maximum voltage, in 0.1Volt increments re-measuring carrier frequency at each voltage. Pause at nominal voltage for 1.5 hours unpowered, to allow any self-heating to stabilize, before continuing. 6. Subject the EUT to overnight soak at +50℃. 7. With the EUT, powered via nominal voltage, connected to the CMW500 and in a simulated call on the centre channel, measure the carrier frequency. These measurements should be made within 2 minutes of Powering up the EUT, to prevent significant self-warming. 8. Repeat the above measurements at 10 ℃ increments from +50℃ to -30℃. Allow at least 1.5 hours at each temperature, unpowered, before making measurements 9. At all temperature levels hold the temperature to +/- 0.5℃ during the measurement procedure. Frequency Stability Under Voltage Variations: Set chamber temperature to 20℃. Use a variable AC power supply / DC power source to power the EUT and set the voltage to rated voltage. Set the spectrum analyzer RBW low enough to obtain the desired frequency resolution and recorded the frequency. Reduce the input voltage to specify extreme voltage variation (±15%) and endpoint, record the maximum frequency change. TEST RESULTS

Report No.: GTS20190929003-1-3-9 Page 31 of 32 Remark: 1. We tested all RB Configuration refer 3GPP TS136 521 for each Channel Bandwidth of LTE FDD Band 17; recorded worst case. LTE Band 17, 5 MHz bandwidth (worst case of all bandwidths) at 1RB#0 for Mid channel Frequency Error vs Voltage Voltage Frequency error (Hz) Frequency error (ppm) Limit (V) QPSK 16QAM QPSK 16QAM (ppm) 3.40 -4.28 -8.72 -0.006 -0.012 2.50 3.80 5.08 -7.28 0.007 -0.010 2.50 4.20 3.89 7.29 0.005 0.010 2.50 Frequency Error vs Temperature Temperature Frequency error (Hz) Frequency error (ppm) Limit (℃) QPSK 16QAM QPSK 16QAM (ppm) -30° 6.38 -8.57 0.009 -0.012 2.50 -20° -8.72 9.54 -0.012 0.013 2.50 -10° 4.53 7.52 0.006 0.011 2.50 0° -8.20 5.25 -0.012 0.007 2.50 10° -5.19 6.28 -0.007 0.009 2.50 20° -6.18 -7.16 -0.009 -0.010 2.50 30° 7.21 -9.25 0.010 -0.013 2.50 40° 6.28 -5.16 0.009 -0.007 2.50 50° 5.28 -35.00 0.007 -0.049 2.50

Report No.: GTS20190929003-1-3-9 Page 32 of 32 5. Test Setup Photos of the EUT 6. External and Internal Photos of the EUT Reference to the test report No. GTS20190929003-1-3-1 .......................End of Report.........................


Document Created: 2019-10-21 08:26:45
Document Modified: 2019-10-21 08:26:45
© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC