Test Report (DFS)

FCC ID: QYLE100AVL2

Test Report

Download: PDF
FCCID_2500064

DFS TEST REPORT REPORT NO.: RF141024C08 MODEL NO.: E100-AVL FCC ID: QYLE100AVL RECEIVED: Oct. 24, 2014 TESTED: Oct. 29 ~ Oct. 30, 2014 ISSUED: Oct. 31, 2014 APPLICANT: Getac Technology Corporation. ADDRESS: 5F., Building A, No. 209, Sec. 1, Nangang Rd., Nangang Dist., Taipei City 11568, Taiwan, R.O.C. ISSUED BY: Bureau Veritas Consumer Products Services (H.K.) Ltd., Taoyuan Branch TEST LOCATION: No. 47-2, 14th Ling, Chia Pau Vil., Lin Kou Dist., New Taipei City, Taiwan ( R.O.C. ) TEST LOCATION: No. 19, Hwa Ya 2nd Rd, Wen Hwa Tsuen, Kwei Shan Hsiang, Taoyuan Hsien 333, Taiwan, R.O.C. This report should not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by TAF or any government agencies. This report is for your exclusive use. Any copying or replication of this report to or for any other person or entity, or use of our name or trademark, is permitted only with our prior written permission. This report sets forth our findings solely with respect to the test samples identified herein. The results set forth in this report are not indicative or representative of the quality or characteristics of the lot from which a test sample was taken or any similar or identical product unless specifically and expressly noted. Our report includes all of the tests requested by you and the results thereof based upon the information that you provided to us. You have 60 days from date of issuance of this report to notify us of any material error or omission caused by our negligence, provided, however, that such notice shall be in writing and shall specifically address the issue you wish to raise. A failure to raise such issue within the prescribed time shall constitute your unqualified acceptance of the completeness of this report, the tests conducted and the correctness of the report contents. Unless specific mention, the uncertainty of measurement has been explicitly taken into account to declare the compliance or non-compliance to the specification. Report No.: RF141024C08 1 of 24 Report Format Version 5.1.0

Table of Contents RELEASE CONTROL RECORD ............................................................................................ 3 1. CERTIFICATION ......................................................................................................... 4 2. EUT INFORMATION ................................................................................................... 5 2.1 OPERATING FREQUENCY BANDS AND MODE OF EUT ........................................ 5 2.2 EUT SOFTWARE AND FIRMWARE VERSION .......................................................... 5 2.3 DESCRIPTION OF AVAILABLE ANTENNAS TO THE EUT ....................................... 5 2.4 EUT HIGHEST AND LOWEST CONDUCTED POWER ............................................. 6 2.5 EUT HIGHEST AND LOWEST E.I.R.P. POWER ........................................................ 7 2.6 TRANSMIT POWER CONTROL (TPC) ...................................................................... 8 2.7 STATEMENT OF MAUNFACTURER .......................................................................... 8 3. U-NII DFS RULE REQUIREMENTS ........................................................................... 9 3.1 WORKING MODES AND REQUIRED TEST ITEMS .................................................. 9 3.2 TEST LIMITS AND RADAR SIGNAL PARAMETERS ............................................... 10 4. TEST & SUPPORT EQUIPMENT LIST..................................................................... 13 4.1 TEST INSTRUMENTS .............................................................................................. 13 4.2 DESCRIPTION OF SUPPORT UNITS ...................................................................... 13 5. TEST PROCEDURE ................................................................................................. 14 5.1 ADT DFS MEASUREMENT SYSTEM: ..................................................................... 14 5.2 CALIBRATION OF DFS DETECTION THRESHOLD LEVEL: .................................. 15 5.3 DEVIATION FROM TEST STANDARD ..................................................................... 16 5.4 RADIATED TEST SETUP CONFIGURATION .......................................................... 16 5.4.1 CLIENT WITHOUT RADAR DETECTION MODE ..................................................... 16 6. TEST RESULTS ........................................................................................................ 17 6.1 SUMMARY OF TEST RESULT ................................................................................. 17 6.2 DETAILED TEST RESULTS...................................................................................... 18 6.2.1 TEST MODE: DEVICE OPERATING IN CLIENT WITHOUT RADAR DETECTION MODE ....................................................................................................................... 18 6.2.2 DFS DETECTION THRESHOLD .............................................................................. 18 6.2.3 CHANNEL CLOSING TRANSMISSION AND CHANNEL MOVE TIME .................... 19 6.2.4 NON- OCCUPANCY PERIOD................................................................................... 21 6.2.4 NON-ASSOCIATED TEST ........................................................................................ 23 6.2.5 NON- CO-CHANNEL TEST ...................................................................................... 23 7. TESTING LABORATORIES INFORMATION ............................................................ 24 Report No.: RF141024C08 2 of 24 Report Format Version 5.1.0

RELEASE CONTROL RECORD ISSUE NO. REASON FOR CHANGE DATE ISSUED RF141024C08 Original release Oct. 31, 2014 Report No.: RF141024C08 3 of 24 Report Format Version 5.1.0

1. CERTIFICATION PRODUCT:Rugged PC MODEL:E100-AVL BRAND: Getac APPLICANT: Getac Technology Corporation. TESTED: Oct. 29 ~ Oct. 30, 2014 TEST SAMPLE: IDENTICAL PROTOTYPE STANDARDS: FCC Part 15, Subpart E (Section 15.407) FCC KDB 905462 D02 The above equipment (Model: E100-AVL) has been tested by Bureau Veritas Consumer Products Services (H.K.) Ltd., Taoyuan Branch, and found compliance with the requirement of the above standards. The test record, data evaluation & Equipment Under Test (EUT) configurations represented herein are true and accurate accounts of the measurements of the sample’s EMC characteristics under the conditions specified in this report. PREPARED BY : , DATE : Oct. 31, 2014 Celine Chou / Specialist APPROVED BY : , DATE : Oct. 31, 2014 Ken Liu / Senior Manager Report No.: RF141024C08 4 of 24 Report Format Version 5.1.0

2. EUT INFORMATION 2.1 OPERATING FREQUENCY BANDS AND MODE OF EUT TABLE 1: OPERATING FREQUENCY BANDS AND MODE OF EUT Operating Frequency Range Operational Mode 5250~5350MHz 5470~5725MHz Client without radar detection and   ad hoc function 2.2 EUT SOFTWARE AND FIRMWARE VERSION TABLE 2: THE EUT SOFTWARE/FIRMWARE VERSION No. Product Test Model No. Software/Firmware Version 1 Rugged PC E100-AVL 17.0.2.5 2.3 DESCRIPTION OF AVAILABLE ANTENNAS TO THE EUT TABLE 3: ANTENNA LIST Operation Frequency Ant NO. Type Max. Gain(dBi) Range(MHz) 1 PIFA 5250-5350 MHz 4.67 1 PIFA 5470-5725 MHz 4.67 Report No.: RF141024C08 5 of 24 Report Format Version 5.1.0

2.4 EUT HIGHEST AND LOWEST CONDUCTED POWER TABLE 4: THE MEASURED CONDUCTED OUTPUT POWER 802.11a MAX. POWER ANT NO. FREQUENCY BAND (MHz) OUTPUT POWER(dBm) OUTPUT POWER(mW) 1 5250~5350 15.95 39.355 1 5470~5725 16.45 44.157 802.11n HT20 MAX. POWER ANT NO. FREQUENCY BAND (MHz) OUTPUT POWER(dBm) OUTPUT POWER(mW) 1 5250~5350 15.95 39.355 1 5470~5725 16.35 43.152 802.11n HT40 MAX. POWER ANT NO. FREQUENCY BAND (MHz) OUTPUT POWER(dBm) OUTPUT POWER(mW) 1 5250~5350 15.22 33.266 1 5470~5725 16.27 42.364 Report No.: RF141024C08 6 of 24 Report Format Version 5.1.0

2.5 EUT HIGHEST AND LOWEST EIRP POWER TABLE 5: THE EIRP OUTPUT POWER LIST 802.11a MAX. POWER ANT NO. FREQUENCY BAND (MHz) OUTPUT POWER(dBm) OUTPUT POWER(mW) 1 5250~5350 20.62 115.345 1 5470~5725 21.12 129.420 802.11n HT20 MAX. POWER ANT NO. FREQUENCY BAND (MHz) OUTPUT POWER(dBm) OUTPUT POWER(mW) 1 5250~5350 20.62 115.345 1 5470~5725 21.02 126.474 802.11n HT40 MAX. POWER ANT NO. FREQUENCY BAND (MHz) OUTPUT POWER(dBm) OUTPUT POWER(mW) 1 5250~5350 19.89 97.499 1 5470~5725 20.94 124.165 Report No.: RF141024C08 7 of 24 Report Format Version 5.1.0

2.6 TRANSMIT POWER CONTROL (TPC) U-NII devices operating in the 5.25-5.35 GHz band and the 5.47-5.725 GHz band shall employ a TPC mechanism. The U-NII device is required to have the capability to operate at least 6 dB below the mean EIRP value of 30 dBm. A TPC mechanism is not required for systems with an e.i.r.p. of less than 500 mW. Maximum EIRP of this device is 127.644 mW which less than 500mW, therefore it’s not require TPC function. 2.7 STATEMENT OF MAUNFACTURER Manufacturer statement confirming that information regarding the parameters of the detected Radar Waveforms is not available to the end user. And the device doesn’t have Ad Hoc mode on DFS frequency band. Report No.: RF141024C08 8 of 24 Report Format Version 5.1.0

3. U-NII DFS RULE REQUIREMENTS 3.1 WORKING MODES AND REQUIRED TEST ITEMS The manufacturer shall state whether the EUT is capable of operating as a Master and/or a Client. If the EUT is capable of operating in more than one operating mode then each operating mode shall be tested separately. See tables 6 and 7 for the applicability of DFS requirements for each of the operational modes. TABLE 6: APPLICABILITY OF DFS REQUIREMENTS PRIOR TO USE A CHANNEL Operational Mode Requirement Client without Client with radar Master radar detection detection Non-Occupancy Period  Not required  DFS Detection Threshold  Not required  Channel Availability Check Time  Not required Not required U-NII Detection Bandwidth  Not required  TABLE 7: APPLICABILITY OF DFS REQUIREMENTS DURING NORMAL OPERATION Operational Mode Requirement Master or Client with Client without radar radar detection detection DFS Detection Threshold  Not required Channel Closing Transmission Time   Channel Move Time   U-NII Detection Bandwidth  Not required Additional requirements for devices Master or Client with Client without radar with multiple bandwidth modes radar detection detection U-NII Detection Bandwidth and All BW modes must be Not required Statistical Performance Check tested Channel Move Time and Channel Test using widest BW Test using the widest BW Closing Transmission Time mode available mode available for the link All other tests Any single BW mode Not required Note: Frequencies selected for statistical performance check (Section 7.8.4) should include several frequencies within the radar detection bandwidth and frequencies near the edge of the radar detection bandwidth. For 802.11 devices it is suggested to select frequencies in all 20 MHz channel blocks and a null frequencies between the bonded 20 MHz channel blocks. Report No.: RF141024C08 9 of 24 Report Format Version 5.1.0

3.2 TEST LIMITS AND RADAR SIGNAL PARAMETERS DETECTION THRESHOLD VALUES TABLE 8: DFS DETECTION THRESHOLDS FOR MASTER DEVICES AND CLIENT DEVICES WITH RADAR DETECTION Value Maximum Transmit Power (See Notes 1, 2, and 3) EIRP ≥ 200 milliwatt -64 dBm EIRP < 200 milliwatt and -62 dBm power spectral density < 10 dBm/MHz EIRP < 200 milliwatt that do not meet the -64 dBm power spectral density requirement Note 1: This is the level at the input of the receiver assuming a 0 dBi receive antenna. Note 2: Throughout these test procedures an additional 1 dB has been added to the amplitude of the test transmission waveforms to account for variations in measurement equipment. This will ensure that the test signal is at or above the detection threshold level to trigger a DFS response. Note3: EIRP is based on the highest antenna gain. For MIMO devices refer to KDB Publication 662911 D01. TABLE 9: DFS RESPONSE REQUIREMENT VALUES Parameter Value Non-occupancy period Minimum 30 minutes Channel Availability Check Time 60 seconds Channel Move Time 10 seconds See Note 1. Channel Closing Transmission Time 200 milliseconds + an aggregate of 60 milliseconds over remaining 10 second period. See Notes 1 and 2. U-NII Detection Bandwidth Minimum 100% of the U-NII 99% transmission power bandwidth. See Note 3 Note 1: Channel Move Time and the Channel Closing Transmission Time should be performed with Radar Type 0. The measurement timing begins at the end of the Radar Type 0 burst. Note 2: The Channel Closing Transmission Time is comprised of 200 milliseconds starting at the beginning of the Channel Move Time plus any additional intermittent control signals required to facilitate a Channel move (an aggregate of 60 milliseconds) during the remainder of the 10 second period. The aggregate duration of control signals will not count quiet periods in between transmissions. Note 3: During the U-NII Detection Bandwidth detection test, radar type 0 should be used. For each frequency step the minimum percentage of detection is 90 percent. Measurements are performed with no data traffic. Report No.: RF141024C08 10 of 24 Report Format Version 5.1.0

PARAMETERS OF DFS TEST SIGNALS Step intervals of 0.1 microsecond for Pulse Width, 1 microsecond for PRI, 1 MHz for chirp width and 1 for the number of pulses will be utilized for the random determination of specific test waveforms. TABLE 10: SHORT PULSE RADAR TEST WAVEFORMS Minimum Minimum Radar Pulse Width PRI Number Percentage of Number of Type (µsec) (µsec) of Pulses Successful Trials Detection 0 1 1428 18 See Note 1 See Note 1 1 1 Test A: 15 unique 60% 30 PRI values randomly selected from the list of 23 PRI values in Table 5a ------------------------ Test B: 15 unique PRI values randomly selected within the range of 518-3066 μsec, with a minimum increment of 1 μsec, excluding PRI values selected in Test A 2 1-5 150-230 23-29 60% 30 3 6-10 200-500 16-18 60% 30 4 11-20 200-500 12-16 60% 30 Aggregate (Radar Types 1-4) 80% 120 Note 1: Short Pulse Radar Type 0 should be used for the detection bandwidth test, channel move time, and channel closing time tests. Report No.: RF141024C08 11 of 24 Report Format Version 5.1.0

TABLE 11: LONG PULSE RADAR TEST WAVEFORM Minimum Pulse Chirp Number Minimum Radar PRI Number Percentage of Width Width of Pulses Number of Type (µsec) of Bursts Successful (µsec) (MHz) per Burst Trials Detection 5 50-100 5-20 1000-2000 1-3 8-20 80% 30 TABLE 12: FREQUENCY HOPPING RADAR TEST WAVEFORM Hopping Minimum Pulse Pulses Hopping Minimum Radar PRI Sequence Percentage of Width per Rate Number of Type (µsec) Length Successful (µsec) Hop (kHz) Trials (msec) Detection 6 1 333 9 0.333 300 70% 30 Report No.: RF141024C08 12 of 24 Report Format Version 5.1.0

4. TEST & SUPPORT EQUIPMENT LIST 4.1 TEST INSTRUMENTS TABLE 13: TEST INSTRUMENTS LIST CALIBRATED DESCRIPTION & MANUFACTURER MODEL NO. BRAND UNTIL R&S Spectrum analyzer FSP40 R&S 2015/03/02 Signal generator 8645A Agilent 2015/06/23 Oscilloscope TDS 5104 Tektronix 2015/03/19 4.2 DESCRIPTION OF SUPPORT UNITS TABLE 14: SUPPORT UNIT INFORMATION NO. PRODUCT BRAND MODEL NO. FCC ID SPEC. 5G Ant gain : 3.428dB 1 Router D-Link DIR-868L RRK2012060056-1 Maximum EIRP : 27.64dBm NOTE: This device was functioned as a Master Slave device during the DFS test. TABLE 15: SOFTWARE/FIRMWARE INFORMATION SOFTWARE/FIRMWARE NO. PRODUCT MODEL NO. VERSION 1 Router DIR-868L 1.00 Report No.: RF141024C08 13 of 24 Report Format Version 5.1.0

5. TEST PROCEDURE 5.1 ADT DFS MEASUREMENT SYSTEM: A complete ADT DFS Measurement System consists of two subsystems: (1) the Radar Signal Generating Subsystem and (2) the Traffic Monitoring Subsystem. The control PC is necessary for generating the Radar waveforms in Table 10, 11 and 12. The traffic monitoring subsystem is specified to the type of unit under test (UUT). Radiated setup configuration of ADT DFS Measurement System System testing will be performed with channel-loading using means appropriate to the data types that are used by the unlicensed device. The following requirements apply: a) The data file must be of a type that is typical for the device (i.e., MPEG-2, MPEG-4, WAV, MP3, V MP4, AVI, etc.) and must generally be transmitting in a streaming mode. b) Software to ping the client is permitted to simulate data transfer but must have random ping intervals. c) Timing plots are required with calculations demonstrating a minimum channel loading of approximately 17% or greater. d) Unicast or Multicast protocols are preferable but other protocols may be used. The appropriate protocol used must be described in the test procedures. Report No.: RF141024C08 14 of 24 Report Format Version 5.1.0

5.2 CALIBRATION OF DFS DETECTION THRESHOLD LEVEL The measured channel is 5500MHz and 5510MHz. The radar signal was the same as transmitted channels, and injected into the antenna of AP (master) or Client Device with Radar Detection, measured the channel closing transmission time and channel move time. The calibrated detection threshold level is set to -64dBm. The tested level is lower than required level hence it provides margin to the limit. Radiated setup configuration of Calibration of DFS Detection Threshold Level Report No.: RF141024C08 15 of 24 Report Format Version 5.1.0

5.3 DEVIATION FROM TEST STANDARD No deviation. 5.4 RADIATED TEST SETUP CONFIGURATION 5.4.1 CLIENT WITHOUT RADAR DETECTION MODE The UUT is a U-NII Device operating in Client mode without radar detection. The radar test signals are injected into the Master Device. Report No.: RF141024C08 16 of 24 Report Format Version 5.1.0

6. TEST RESULTS 6.1 SUMMARY OF TEST RESULT CLAUSE TEST PARAMETER REMARKS PASS/FAIL 15.407 DFS Detection Threshold Not Applicable NA 15.407 Channel Availability Check Time Not Applicable NA 15.407 Channel Move Time Applicable Pass 15.407 Channel Closing Transmission Time Applicable Pass 15.407 Non- Occupancy Period Applicable Pass 15.407 Uniform Spreading Not Applicable NA 15.407 U-NII Detection Bandwidth Not Applicable NA 15.407 Non-associated test Applicable Pass 15.407 Non-Co-Channel test Applicable Pass Report No.: RF141024C08 17 of 24 Report Format Version 5.1.0

6.2 DETAILED TEST RESULTS 6.2.1 TEST MODE: DEVICE OPERATING IN CLIENT WITHOUT RADAR DETECTION MODE Client with injection at the Master. (The radar test signals are injected into the Master Device) 6.2.2 DFS DETECTION THRESHOLD For a detection threshold level of -64dBm, the required signal strength at EUT antenna location is -64dBm. The tested level is lower than required level hence it provides margin to the limit. Radar signal Noise Floor Radar Signal 0 Report No.: RF141024C08 18 of 24 Report Format Version 5.1.0

6.2.3 CHANNEL CLOSING TRANSMISSION AND CHANNEL MOVE TIME RADAR SIGNAL 0 802.11n 20MHz Radar Signal Traffic Signal Noise Floor NOTE: T1 denotes the start of Channel Move Time upon the end of the last Radar burst. T2 denotes the data transmission time of 200ms from T1. T3 denotes the end of Channel Move Time.T4 denotes the 10 second from T1 to observe the aggregate duration of transmissions. Radar Signal Noise Floor NOTE: An expanded plot for the device vacates the channel in the required 500ms. Report No.: RF141024C08 19 of 24 Report Format Version 5.1.0

RADAR SIGNAL 0 802.11n 40MHz Radar Signal Traffic Signal Noise Floor NOTE: T1 denotes the start of Channel Move Time upon the end of the last Radar burst. T2 denotes the data transmission time of 200ms from T1. T3 denotes the end of Channel Move Time.T4 denotes the 10 second from T1 to observe the aggregate duration of transmissions. Radar Signal Noise Floor NOTE: An expanded plot for the device vacates the channel in the required 500ms. Report No.: RF141024C08 20 of 24 Report Format Version 5.1.0

6.2.4 NON- OCCUPANCY PERIOD Associate test: During the 30 minutes observation time, UUT did not make any transmissions on a channel after a radar signal was detected on that channel by either the Channel Availability Check or the In-Service Monitoring. 1) EUT (Client) links with master on 5500MHz. Waveform of EUT links up with Master * RBW 1 MHz * VBW 3 MHz Ref -10 dBm * Att 0 dB * SWT 50 ms -10 A -20 1 PK VIEW -30 -40 -50 -60 3DB -70 -80 -90 -100 -110 Center 5.5 GHz 5 MHz/ Span 50 MHz 2) Client plays specified files via master. Waveform of transmission * RBW 1 MHz * VBW 3 MHz Ref -10 dBm * Att 0 dB * SWT 50 ms -10 A -20 1 PK VIEW -30 2 AP VIEW -40 -50 -60 3DB -70 -80 -90 -100 -110 Center 5.5 GHz 5 MHz/ Span 50 MHz Report No.: RF141024C08 21 of 24 Report Format Version 5.1.0

3) Radar signal 0 is applied to the Master device and WiFi traffic signal stop immediately. 4) 5500MHz has been monitored in 30 minutes period. In this period, no any transmission occurs. Plot of 30minutes period 802.11n 20MHz Traffic Signal Injected into Radar Noise Floor NOTE: Test setup are shown on Test setup photo. pdf Report No.: RF141024C08 22 of 24 Report Format Version 5.1.0

6.2.4 NON-ASSOCIATED TEST Master was off. During the 30 minutes observation time, The UUT did not make any transmissions in the DFS band after UUT power up. Noise Floor 6.2.5 NON- CO-CHANNEL TEST The UUT was investigated after radar was detected the channel and made sure no co-channel operation with radars. Report No.: RF141024C08 23 of 24 Report Format Version 5.1.0

7. TESTING LABORATORIES INFORMATION We, Bureau Veritas Consumer Products Services (H.K.) Ltd., Taoyuan Branch, were founded in 1988 to provide our best service in EMC, Radio, Telecom and Safety consultation. Our laboratories are accredited and approved according to ISO/IEC 17025. If you have any comments, please feel free to contact us at the following: Linko EMC/RF Lab: Hsin Chu EMC/RF/Telecom Lab: Tel: 886-2-26052180 Tel: 886-3-5935343 Fax: 886-2-26051924 Fax: 886-3-5935342 Hwa Ya EMC/RF/Safety Lab: Tel: 886-3-3183232 Fax: 886-3-3270892 Email: service.adt@tw.bureauveritas.com Web Site: www.bureauveritas-adt.com The address and road map of all our labs can be found in our web site also. ---END--- Report No.: RF141024C08 24 of 24 Report Format Version 5.1.0


Document Created: 2014-12-10 16:47:39
Document Modified: 2014-12-10 16:47:39
© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC