test report

FCC ID: QP8EASITRAX

Test Report

Download: PDF
FCCID_796215

FCC Certification Test Report For the Mars Electronics (MEI) easitrax™ FCC ID: QP8EASITRAX WLL JOB# 9554 April 19, 2007 Prepared for: Mars Electronics (MEI) 1301 Wilson Drive West Chester, PA 19380 Prepared By: Washington Laboratories, Ltd. 7560 Lindbergh Drive Gaithersburg, Maryland 20879

Mars Electronics (MEI) FCC Certification Test Report easitrax™ April 2007 FCC Certification Test Report for the Mars Electronics (MEI) easitrax™ FCC ID: QP8EASITRAX April 19, 2007 WLL JOB# 9554 Prepared by: Brian J. Dettling Documentation Specialist Reviewed by: Steven D. Koster EMC Operations Manager

Mars Electronics (MEI) FCC Certification Test Report easitrax™ April 2007 Abstract This report has been prepared on behalf of Mars Electronics (MEI) to support the attached Application for Equipment Authorization. The test report and application are submitted for an Intentional Radiator under Part 15.225 of the FCC Rules and Regulations. This Certification Test Report documents the test configuration and test results for a Mars Electronics (MEI) easitrax™. Testing was performed on an Open Area Test Site (OATS) of Washington Laboratories, Ltd, 7560 Lindbergh Drive, Gaithersburg, MD 20879. Site description and site attenuation data have been placed on file with the FCC's Sampling and Measurements Branch at the FCC laboratory in Columbia, MD. Washington Laboratories, Ltd. has been accepted by the FCC and approved by NIST NVLAP (NVLAP Lab Code: 200066-0) as an independent FCC test laboratory. The Mars Electronics (MEI) easitrax™ complies with the limits for an Intentional Radiator device under FCC Part 15.225. WLL Report #9554-01 - ii - © 2007 Washington Laboratories, Ltd.

Mars Electronics (MEI) FCC Certification Test Report easitrax™ April 2007 Table of Contents Abstract ........................................................................................................................................... ii 1 Introduction..........................................................................................................................1 1.1 Compliance Statement .....................................................................................................1 1.2 Test Scope........................................................................................................................1 1.3 Contract Information........................................................................................................1 1.4 Test Dates ........................................................................................................................1 1.5 Test and Support Personnel .............................................................................................1 1.6 Abbreviations...................................................................................................................2 2 Equipment Under Test .........................................................................................................3 2.1 EUT Identification & Description ...................................................................................3 2.2 Test Configuration ...........................................................................................................3 2.3 Testing Algorithm............................................................................................................4 2.4 Test Location ...................................................................................................................4 2.5 Measurements ..................................................................................................................5 2.5.1 References....................................................................................................................5 2.6 Measurement Uncertainty................................................................................................5 3 Test Equipment ....................................................................................................................6 4 Test Results..........................................................................................................................7 4.1 Occupied Bandwidth........................................................................................................7 4.2 Radiated Spurious Emissions: §15.225, §15.209 ............................................................9 4.2.1 Test Procedure ...........................................................................................................9 4.2.2 Test Results................................................................................................................10 4.3 Frequency Stability: (FCC Part §2.1055) ......................................................................12 4.3.1 Test Procedure ...........................................................................................................12 4.3.2 Test Results................................................................................................................12 4.4 Conducted Emissions (AC Power Line) ........................................................................14 List of Tables Table 1. Device Summary............................................................................................................... 3 Table 2: Test Equipment List.......................................................................................................... 6 Table 3: Occupied Bandwidth Results............................................................................................ 8 Table 4: Radiated Spurious Emissions Limits ................................................................................ 9 Table 5: Radiated Emission Test Data, Fundamental Frequency ................................................. 10 Table 6: Radiated Emission Test Data.......................................................................................... 11 Table 7: Frequency Stability Test Data ........................................................................................ 13 Table 8: AC Power Conducted Emissions Test Data ................................................................... 14 List of Figures Figure 1: Test Configuration........................................................................................................... 4 Figure 2. Occupied Bandwidth ....................................................................................................... 7 WLL Report #9554-01 - iii - © 2007 Washington Laboratories, Ltd.

Mars Electronics (MEI) FCC Certification Test Report easitrax™ April 2007 1 Introduction 1.1 Compliance Statement The Mars Electronics (MEI) easitrax™ complies with the limits for an Intentional Radiator device under FCC Part 15.225. 1.2 Test Scope Tests for radiated and conducted emissions were performed. All measurements were performed in accordance with the 2003 version of ANSI C63.4. The measurement equipment conforms to ANSI C63.2 Specifications for Electromagnetic Noise and Field Strength Instrumentation. 1.3 Contract Information Customer: Mars Electronics (MEI) 1301 Wilson Drive West Chester, PA 19380 Purchase Order Number: 4500043252 Quotation Number: 63378 1.4 Test Dates Testing was performed on the following date(s): January 23 and February 15, 2007 1.5 Test and Support Personnel Washington Laboratories, LTD John Repella Client Representative Bob Carney WLL Report #9554-01 - Page 1 of 14 - © 2007 Washington Laboratories, Ltd.

Mars Electronics (MEI) FCC Certification Test Report easitrax™ April 2007 1.6 Abbreviations A Ampere ac alternating current AM Amplitude Modulation Amps Amperes b/s bits per second BW BandWidth CE Conducted Emission cm centimeter CW Continuous Wave dB deciBel dc direct current EMI Electromagnetic Interference EUT Equipment Under Test FM Frequency Modulation G giga - prefix for 109 multiplier Hz Hertz IF Intermediate Frequency k kilo - prefix for 103 multiplier LISN Line Impedance Stabilization Network M Mega - prefix for 106 multiplier m meter µ micro - prefix for 10-6 multiplier NB Narrowband QP Quasi-Peak RE Radiated Emissions RF Radio Frequency rms root-mean-square SN Serial Number S/A Spectrum Analyzer V Volt WLL Report #9554-01 - Page 2 of 14 - © 2007 Washington Laboratories, Ltd.

Mars Electronics (MEI) FCC Certification Test Report easitrax™ April 2007 2 Equipment Under Test 2.1 EUT Identification & Description The Mars Electronics (MEI) easitrax™ is comprised of the Cashflow SC66 Series Bill Validator. It is a digital signal processor based currency recognition acceptor used primarily in the Gaming or Retail industry to validate and store legitimate currency and issue credit to its host machine. The validator consist of a chassis, removable bill cassette (with RF tag installed), acceptor module (with control PCB, LED PCB, sensor PCBs, and transport motors) , an interface PCB, antenna PCB, and interface cable. The antenna PCB couples to the I/F PCB and is downward looking in order to communicate with the RF tag. Power is supplied to the acceptor module via the interface cable which provides 24Vdc, normally supplied from the 120Vac host machine. Table 1. Device Summary ITEM DESCRIPTION Manufacturer: Mars Electronics (MEI) FCC ID: QP8EASITRAX Model: easitrax™ FCC Rule Parts: §15.225 Frequency Range: 13.56MHz Maximum Output Power: 109.2 µV/m at 10 meters Modulation: None Occupied Bandwidth: 2.23 kHz Type of Information: Data Number of Channels: 1 Power Output Level Fixed Antenna Type Internal PCB Frequency Tolerance: >±0.01% (±100 ppm) Interface Cables: Power Power Source & Voltage: 24Vdc from 120Vac 2.2 Test Configuration The easitrax™ was configured for testing as indicated in the figure below. WLL Report #9554-01 - Page 3 of 14 - © 2007 Washington Laboratories, Ltd.

Mars Electronics (MEI) FCC Certification Test Report easitrax™ April 2007 Figure 1: Test Configuration 2.3 Testing Algorithm The Reader operates at 13.56MHz. The Reader talks to the RF Tag on the lower side at 156KHz modulation. This is Miller Encoded. The RF tag responds to the Reader using the Manchester Protocol. The Tag does not emit; rather it shorts the Reader's field in a binary response. Functionality: The Reader checks for the presence of an RF tag in its field twice a second. This check takes about 20ms. After a Cash Box is installed the system reads and writes the 16 Char Asset number. This process takes about 4 seconds. There are several 20ms reads and writes during this time. Worst case emission levels are provided in the test results data. 2.4 Test Location All measurements herein were performed at Washington Laboratories, Ltd. test center in Gaithersburg, MD. Site description and site attenuation data have been placed on file with the FCC's Sampling and Measurements Branch at the FCC laboratory in Columbia, MD. Washington Laboratories, Ltd. has been accepted by the FCC and approved by NIST NVLAP (NVLAP Lab Code: 200066-0) as an independent FCC test laboratory. WLL Report #9554-01 - Page 4 of 14 - © 2007 Washington Laboratories, Ltd.

Mars Electronics (MEI) FCC Certification Test Report easitrax™ April 2007 2.5 Measurements 2.5.1 References ANSI C63.2 Specifications for Electromagnetic Noise and Field Strength Instrumentation ANSI C63.4 American National Standard for Methods of Measurement of Radio-Noise Emissions from Low-Voltage Electrical and Electronic Equipment in the Range of 9 kHz to 40 GHz Land Mobile FM or PM Communications Equipment Measurement and Performance Standards (ANSI/TIA/EIA-603-93) 2.6 Measurement Uncertainty All results reported herein relate only to the equipment tested. For the purposes of the measurements performed by Washington Laboratories, the measurement uncertainty is ±2.3 dB. This has been calculated for a worst-case situation (radiated emissions measurements performed on an open area test site). The following measurement uncertainty calculation is provided: Total Uncertainty = (A2 + B2 + C2)1/2/(n-1) where: A = Antenna calibration uncertainty, in dB = 2 dB B = Spectrum Analyzer uncertainty, in dB = 1 dB C = Site uncertainty, in dB = 4 dB n = number of factors in uncertainty calculation = 3 Thus, Total Uncertainty = 0.5 (22 + 12 + 42)1/2 = ±2.3 dB. WLL Report #9554-01 - Page 5 of 14 - © 2007 Washington Laboratories, Ltd.

Mars Electronics (MEI) FCC Certification Test Report easitrax™ April 2007 3 Test Equipment Table 2 shows a list of the test equipment used for measurements along with the calibration information. Table 2: Test Equipment List Asset # Manufacturer/Model Description Cal. Due 0069 HP, 85650A ADAPTER, QP 6/26/2007 0117 RACAL DANA FREQUENCY COUNTER 5/4/2007 0473 FLUKE, 111 MULTIMETER, W/CURRENT CLAMP 6/27/2007 0168 BIRD, 8401 RF DUMMY LOAD CNR 0125 SOLAR 8028-50-TS-BNC LISN 2/01/2008 0126 SOLAR 8028-50-TS-BNC LISN 2/01/2008 0070 HP, 85685A PRESELECTOR, RF W/OPT 8ZE 7/3/2007 0071 HP, 85685A PRESELECTOR, RF 6/26/2007 0031 EMCO 6502 ACTIVE LOOP 2/12/2008 0034 EMCO, BIA-30 ANTENNA, BICONICAL 2/28/2008 0029 EMCO, 3146A ANTENNA, LOG PERIODIC 7/19/2008 WLL Report #9554-01 - Page 6 of 14 - © 2007 Washington Laboratories, Ltd.

Mars Electronics (MEI) FCC Certification Test Report easitrax™ April 2007 4 Test Results 4.1 Occupied Bandwidth Occupied bandwidth measurement was performed by coupling the output of the EUT to the input of a spectrum analyzer. The occupied bandwidth was measured as shown: Figure 2. Occupied Bandwidth WLL Report #9554-01 - Page 7 of 14 - © 2007 Washington Laboratories, Ltd.

Mars Electronics (MEI) FCC Certification Test Report easitrax™ April 2007 Table 3 provides a summary of the Occupied Bandwidth Results. Table 3: Occupied Bandwidth Results Frequency Bandwidth Limit Pass/Fail 13.560MHz 2.23 kHz N/A Pass WLL Report #9554-01 - Page 8 of 14 - © 2007 Washington Laboratories, Ltd.

Mars Electronics (MEI) FCC Certification Test Report easitrax™ April 2007 4.2 Radiated Spurious Emissions: §15.225, §15.209 Radiated emissions from the EUT must comply with the field strength limits as specified in FCC Part 15.225 and 15.209. The limits for the radiated emissions are as shown in the following table. Table 4: Radiated Spurious Emissions Limits Frequency Limit Rule Part Reference (MHz) (µV/m) 13.553 - 13.567 15,848 (@ 30m) §15.225(a) 13.410 – 13.553 334 (@ 30m) §15.225(b) 13.567 – 13.710 334 (@ 30m) §15.225(b) 13.110 – 13.410 106 (@ 30m) §15.225(c) 13.710 – 14.010 106 (@ 30m) §15.225(c) 1.705 – 13.110 30 (@ 30m) §15.225(d), §15.209 14.010 – 30.0 30.00 – 88.00 100 (@ 3m) §15.225(d), §15.209 88.00 – 216.00 150 (@ 3m) §15.225(d), §15.209 216.00 – 960.00 200 (@ 3m) §15.225(d), §15.209 Above 960 500 (@ 3m) §15.225(d), §15.209 4.2.1 Test Procedure The EUT was placed on motorized turntable for radiated testing on an Open Area Test Site. The emissions from the EUT were measured continuously at every azimuth by rotating the turntable. Receiving antennas were mounted on an antenna mast to determine the height of maximum emissions. The height of the antenna was varied between 1 and 4 meters. The peripherals were placed on the table in accordance with ANSI C63.4-2003. Cables were varied in position to produce maximum emissions. Both the horizontal and vertical field components were measured Testing at frequencies below 30 MHz was performed at ten meters with a loop antenna. The 30 meter limits were used, and because the unit has power so low, the limit was not changes. The unit complies with the 30 meter limit at 10 meters. Three orientations of the loop antenna were tested. Emissions were scanned up to 1 GHz. Only the fundamental frequency was detected. No other emissions were detected that were related to the RFID Transmitter. All other emissions detected were related to digital emissions of the IUS electronics. Since the EUT is used in a commercial application, these digital emissions were compared to the Class A limit of §15.109(b). For emissions up to 30 MHz peak levels were recorded. Emissions from 30 MHz to 1000 MHz were measured using a Quasi-peak detector. Worst-case emissions are reported in the data table. The following is a sample calculation used in the data tables for calculating the final field strength of spurious emissions and comparing these levels to the specified limits. WLL Report #9554-01 - Page 9 of 14 - © 2007 Washington Laboratories, Ltd.

Mars Electronics (MEI) FCC Certification Test Report easitrax™ April 2007 Sample Calculation: Spectrum Analyzer Voltage (SA Level): VdBµV Antenna Factor (Ant Corr): AFdB/m Cable Loss Correction (Cable Corr): CCdB Amplifier Gain: GdB (if applicable) Electric Field (Corr Level): EdBµV/m = VdBµV + AFdB/m + CCdB - GdB To convert to linear units: EµV/m = antilog (EdBµV/m/20) 4.2.2 Test Results The EUT complies with the radiated emission requirements of §15.225. Table 5: Radiated Emission Test Data, Fundamental Frequency SA Ant. Ant. Cable Corr. Corr. Frequency Polarity Az Level Limit Margin Height Corr. Corr. Level Level (MHz) H/V Deg (QP) (µV/m) (dB) (m) (dB/m) (dB) (dBµV/m) (µV/m) (dBµV) 13.559 X 270.0 1.0 26.00 10.9 1.1 37.9 78.8 15848.0 -46.1 13.559 Y 270.0 1.0 22.44 10.9 1.1 34.4 52.3 15848.0 -49.6 13.559 Z 270.0 1.0 19.76 10.9 1.1 31.7 38.4 15848.0 -52.3 Notes: 0 degree azimuth; antenna height = one (1) meter WLL Report #9554-01 - Page 10 of 14 - © 2007 Washington Laboratories, Ltd.

Mars Electronics (MEI) FCC Certification Test Report easitrax™ April 2007 Table 6: Radiated Emission Test Data SA Ant. Ant. Cable Corr. Corr. Frequency Polarity Az Level Limit Margin Hght Corr. Corr. Level Level (MHz) H/V Deg (QP) (µV/m) (dB) (m) (dB/m) (dB) (dBµV/m) (µV/m) (dBµV) 81.350 V 138.0 1.0 13.70 7.8 2.5 24.0 15.8 90.0 -15.1 135.590 V 180.0 1.0 19.80 13.3 3.2 36.3 65.5 150.0 -7.2 162.750 V 45.0 1.0 14.70 12.1 3.5 30.3 32.7 150.0 -13.2 176.270 V 0.0 1.0 24.20 11.3 3.7 39.2 91.2 150.0 -4.3 189.840 V 270.0 1.0 22.00 11.0 3.8 36.8 69.3 150.0 -6.7 203.403 V 314.0 1.0 15.70 12.0 3.9 31.7 38.3 150.0 -11.8 216.653 V 270.0 1.0 10.80 11.4 4.1 26.3 20.7 210.0 -20.1 257.674 V 270.0 1.0 10.50 12.1 4.6 27.2 22.8 210.0 -19.3 284.797 V 270.0 1.0 9.50 13.3 4.9 27.7 24.2 210.0 -18.8 311.869 V 265.0 1.0 4.70 13.6 5.1 23.4 14.8 210.0 -23.0 81.350 H 0.00 7.8 2.5 10.3 3.3 90.0 -28.8 135.590 H 270.0 3.5 7.80 13.3 3.2 24.3 16.5 150.0 -19.2 162.750 H 225.0 3.5 10.60 12.1 3.5 26.2 20.4 150.0 -17.3 176.270 H 45.0 3.5 20.20 11.3 3.7 35.2 57.6 150.0 -8.3 189.840 H 316.0 3.5 15.50 11.2 3.8 30.5 33.5 150.0 -13.0 203.403 H 106.0 3.5 15.70 12.0 3.9 31.7 38.3 150.0 -11.8 216.998 H 115.0 3.5 13.40 11.4 4.1 28.9 27.8 210.0 -17.6 230.561 H 90.0 3.5 14.80 11.1 4.3 30.2 32.4 210.0 -16.2 257.630 H 132.0 3.5 11.00 12.1 4.6 27.7 24.2 210.0 -18.8 284.804 H 127.0 3.5 12.50 13.3 4.9 30.7 34.2 210.0 -15.8 311.869 H 162.0 3.5 8.10 13.6 5.1 26.8 21.9 210.0 -19.6 Notes: Clocks: 40 MHz, 11.06MHz, 72-84kHz, 32.786kHz, 120MHZ, 20MHz WLL Report #9554-01 - Page 11 of 14 - © 2007 Washington Laboratories, Ltd.

Mars Electronics (MEI) FCC Certification Test Report easitrax™ April 2007 4.3 Frequency Stability: (FCC Part §2.1055) Frequency as a function of temperature and voltage variation shall be maintained within the FCC- prescribed tolerances. Per §15.225(e) the frequency tolerance shall be maintained within ±0.01% of the reference frequency. 4.3.1 Test Procedure The temperature stability was measured with the unit in an environmental chamber used to vary the temperature of the sample. The sample was held at each temperature step to allow the temperature of the sample to stabilize. The frequency stability of the transmitter was examined at the voltage extremes and for the temperature range of -30°C to +50°C. The carrier frequency was measured while the EUT was in the temperature chamber. The reference frequency of the EUT was measured at the ambient room temperature with the frequency counter. The frequency stabilities can be maintained to a lesser temperature range provided that the transmitter is automatically inhibited from operating outside the lesser temperature range. The RF carrier frequency shall not depart from the reference frequency (reference frequency is the frequency at 20ºC and rated supply voltage) in excess of +/-1356 Hz. The EUT is powered by 6Vdc voltage supplied via an external DC power supply. 4.3.2 Test Results The EUT complies with the temperature stability requirements of FCC §15.225(e). Test results are given in Table 7. WLL Report #9554-01 - Page 12 of 14 - © 2007 Washington Laboratories, Ltd.

Mars Electronics (MEI) FCC Certification Test Report easitrax™ April 2007 Table 7: Frequency Stability Test Data Temperature Frequency Difference Deviation (Centigrade) (MHz) (Hz) (%) Ambient 13.560350 0.0 0 -20 13.560480 130.0 0.000959 -10 13.560500 150.0 0.001106 0 13.560450 100.0 0.000737 10 13.560400 50.0 0.000369 20 13.560430 80.0 0.000590 30 13.560350 0.0 0.000000 40 13.560330 -20.0 0.000147 50 13.560400 50.0 0.000369 Frequency Difference Deviation Voltage Voltage (Volts) (MHz) (Hz) (%) (Volts) At rated 13.560330 0 0.0 120VAC At 85% 13.560330 0 0.000000 102VAC At 115% 13.560350 -20 0.000147 138VAC WLL Report #9554-01 - Page 13 of 14 - © 2007 Washington Laboratories, Ltd.

Mars Electronics (MEI) FCC Certification Test Report easitrax™ April 2007 4.4 Conducted Emissions (AC Power Line) The EUT was placed on an 80 cm high 1 x 1.5 m non-conductive table above a ground plane. Power to the EUT was provided through a Solar Corporation 50 Ω/50 µH Line Impedance Stabilization Network bonded to a 3 x 2 meter ground plane. The LISN has its AC input supplied from a filtered AC power source. Power and data cables were moved about to obtain maximum emissions. The 50 Ω output of the LISN was connected to the input of the spectrum analyzer and the emissions in the frequency range of 150 kHz to 30 MHz were measured. The detector function was set to quasi-peak or peak, as appropriate, and the resolution bandwidth during testing was at least 9 kHz, with all post- detector filtering no less than 10 times the resolution bandwidth. The unit was tested with the antenna terminated. AC Power Line conducted emissions test data are included in Table 8. Table 8: AC Power Conducted Emissions Test Data LINE 1 - NEUTRAL Level Cable LISN Limit Level Margin Level Cable Level Limit Margin Frequency (MHz) QP Loss Corr QP Corr QP AVG Loss Corr AVG AVG (dBµV) (dB) (dB) (dBµV) (dBµV) (dB) (dBµV) (dB) (dBµV) (dBµV) (dB) 0.157 43.4 10.1 0.7 65.62 54.3 -11.3 5.4 10.1 16.3 55.6 -39.4 0.161 43.2 10.1 0.7 65.44 54.0 -11.4 8.1 10.1 19.0 55.4 -36.5 0.266 37.5 10.2 0.4 61.24 48.1 -13.1 3.0 10.2 13.6 51.2 -37.6 13.560 11.3 11.9 2.0 60.00 25.2 -34.8 11.3 11.9 25.2 50.0 -24.8 14.196 3.1 12.0 2.1 60.00 17.2 -42.8 0.4 12.0 14.5 50.0 -35.5 27.121 24.4 12.7 4.8 60.00 41.9 -18.1 19.5 12.7 36.9 50.0 -13.1 LINE 2 - PHASE Level Cable LISN Limit Level Margin Level Cable Level Limit Margin Frequency (MHz) QP Loss Corr QP Corr QP AVG Loss Corr AVG AVG (dBµV) (dB) (dB) (dBµV) (dBµV) (dB) (dBµV) (dB) (dBµV) (dBµV) (dB) 0.157 43.1 10.1 0.4 65.62 53.6 -12.0 6.3 10.1 16.8 55.6 -38.8 0.266 37.0 10.2 0.2 61.24 47.4 -13.8 2.9 10.2 13.3 51.2 -37.9 13.560 11.1 11.9 2.7 60.00 25.7 -34.3 11.1 11.9 25.7 50.0 -24.3 14.196 16.9 12.0 2.8 60.00 31.7 -28.3 0.5 12.0 15.3 50.0 -34.7 27.121 24.8 12.7 5.8 60.00 43.2 -16.8 19.8 12.7 38.2 50.0 -11.8 WLL Report #9554-01 - Page 14 of 14 - © 2007 Washington Laboratories, Ltd.


Document Created: 2007-05-23 08:35:54
Document Modified: 2007-05-23 08:35:54
© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC