Test Report

FCC ID: Q3HTAG1200

Test Report

Download: PDF
FCCID_2607126

DATE: 28 April 2015 I.T.L. (PRODUCT TESTING) LTD. FCC Radio Test Report for AeroScout Ltd. Equipment under test: TAG1200 Bi-Directional WiFi Module TAG1200 Tested by: _____________________________ I. Siboni Approved by: _____________________________ D. Shidlowsky This report must not be reproduced, except in full, without the written permission of I.T.L. (Product Testing) Ltd. This report relates only to items tested. Test Report E143013.02 AeroScout Ltd. Page 1 of 24 FCC ACC M Ver 1.2 28 February 2011

Measurement/Technical Report for AeroScout Ltd. TAG1200 Bi-Directional WiFi Module TAG1200 FCC ID: Q3HTAG1200 IC: 5115A-TAG1200 28 April 2015 This report concerns: Original Grant: Class I Change: Class II Change: X Equipment type: Bi-directional WiFi module transmitter Limits used: 47CFR15 Section 15.247 Measurement procedure used is ANSI C63.4-2009. Application for Certification Applicant for this device: prepared by: (different from "prepared by") R. Pinchuck Reuven Amsalem ITL (Product Testing) Ltd. 3 Pekeris St., Einstein Entrance 1Bat Sheva Street Rechovot 76702 Lod 7116002 Israel Israel Tel: +972-8-936-9393 e-mail Rpinchuck@itl.co.il Fax: +972-8-936-5977 e-mail: reuven.amsalem@aeroscout.com Test Report E143013.02 AeroScout Ltd. Page 2 of 24 FCC ACC M Ver 1.2 28 February 2011

TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. GENERAL INFORMATION ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4 1.1 Administrative Information.................................................................................4 1.2 List of Accreditations .........................................................................................5 1.3 Product Description ...........................................................................................6 1.4 Test Methodology..............................................................................................6 1.5 Test Facility .......................................................................................................6 1.6 Measurement Uncertainty .................................................................................6 2. SYSTEM TEST CONFIGURATION--------------------------------------------------------------------- 7 2.1 Justification........................................................................................................7 2.2 EUT Exercise Software .....................................................................................7 2.3 Special Accessories ..........................................................................................7 2.4 Equipment Modifications ...................................................................................7 2.5 Configuration of Tested System ........................................................................8 3. INTERMODULATION TEST SET-UP PHOTOS----------------------------------------------------- 9 5. INTERMODULATION RADIATED ---------------------------------------------------------------------10 5.1 Test procedure ................................................................................................10 5.2 Test Results.....................................................................................................10 5.3 Test Instrumentation Used; Radiated Measurements Intermodulation...........13 6. R.F EXPOSURE/SAFETY--------------------------------------------------------------------------------14 7. APPENDIX A - CORRECTION FACTORS ----------------------------------------------------------16 7.1 Correction factors for CABLE .........................................................................16 7.2 Correction factors for CABLE .........................................................................17 7.3 Correction factors for CABLE .........................................................................18 8.4 Correction factors for Bilog ANTENNA ..........................................................19 7.5 Correction factors for Horn ANTENNA...........................................................20 7.6 Correction factors for LOG PERIODIC ANTENNA ........................................21 7.8 Correction factors for ACTIVE LOOP ANTENNA ...........................................23 8. COMPARISON INDUSTRY CANADA REQUIREMENTS WITH FCC ------------------------24 Test Report E143013.02 AeroScout Ltd. Page 3 of 24 FCC ACC M Ver 1.2 28 February 2011

1. General Information 1.1 Administrative Information Manufacturer: AeroScout Ltd. Manufacturer's Address: 3 Pekeris St. Einstein Entrance 4th Floor Rechovot 76702 Tel: +972-8-9369393 Fax: +972-8-9365977 Manufacturer's Representative: Leonid Genusin Equipment Under Test (E.U.T): TAG1200 Bi-Directional WiFi Module Equipment Model No.: TAG1200 Equipment Serial No.: Not designated Date of Receipt of E.U.T: 02.12.2014 Start of Test: 02.12.2014 End of Test: 02.12.2014 Test Laboratory Location: I.T.L (Product Testing) Ltd. 1 Batsheva St., Lod ISRAEL 7120101 Test Specifications: FCC Part 15, Subpart C RSS-210, Issue 8, 2010 Test Report E143013.02 AeroScout Ltd. Page 4 of 24 FCC ACC M Ver 1.2 28 February 2011

1.2 List of Accreditations The EMC laboratory of I.T.L. is accredited by the following bodies: 1. The American Association for Laboratory Accreditation (A2LA) (U.S.A.), Certificate No. 1152.01. 2. The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) (U.S.A.), FCC Designation Number US1004. 3. The Israel Ministry of the Environment (Israel), Registration No. 1104/01. 4. The Voluntary Control Council for Interference by Information Technology Equipment (VCCI) (Japan), Registration Numbers: C-1350, R-1285. 5. Industry Canada (Canada), IC File No.: 46405-4025; Site No. IC 4025A-1. I.T.L. Product Testing Ltd. is accredited by the American Association for Laboratory Accreditation (A2LA) and the results shown in this test report have been determined in accordance with I.T.L.'s terms of accreditation unless stated otherwise in the report. Test Report E143013.02 AeroScout Ltd. Page 5 of 24 FCC ACC M Ver 1.2 28 February 2011

1.3 Product Description The TAG1200 is a Wi-Fi module which designed to use for real time location systems. The module can be installed inside variety of equipment, such as medical devices, containers, manufacturing equipment and vehicles. The module reports its location to AeroScout Visibility system via Wi-Fi infrastructure. This enables tagged items to be accurately located in real-time and in any environment – from crowded indoor locations such as hospital floors to open outdoor spaces such as parking lots. 1.4 Test Methodology Both conducted and radiated testing were performed according to the procedures in ANSI C63.4: 2009 and RSS, Gen Issue 4. Radiated testing was performed at an antenna to EUT distance of 3 meters. 1.5 Test Facility Both conducted and radiated emissions tests were performed at I.T.L.’s testing facility in Lod, Israel. I.T.L.’s EMC Laboratory is accredited by A2LA, certificate No. 1152.01 and its FCC Designation Number is US1004. 1.6 Measurement Uncertainty Radiated Emission Radiated Emission (CISPR 11, EN 55011, CISPR 22, EN 55022, ANSI C63.4) for open site 30-1000MHz: Expanded Uncertainty (95% Confidence, K=2): ± 5.2 dB Note: See ITL Procedure No. PM 198. Test Report E143013.02 AeroScout Ltd. Page 6 of 24 FCC ACC M Ver 1.2 28 February 2011

2. System Test Configuration 2.1 Justification The EUT was originally authorized for single modular approval under FCC ID: Q3HTAG1200, IC: 5115A-TAG1200. Grant Notes state that “the antenna (s) used for this transmitter …. must not transmit simultaneously with any other antenna or transmitter.” AeroScout LTD is requesting FCC/IC certification of another product, the Fall Monitor under FCC ID: Q3HFM, IC: 5115A-FM. This device contains the EUT (2.4 GHZ modular approved transmitter) and an additional 916 MHz transmitter which incorporates 2 diversity printed antennas. A C2PC is requested to: 1) Allow simultaneous transmission of both the 2.4 GHz and 916 MHz transmitter in the Fall Monitor; 2) Add limited modular approval of the EUT in the new host, the Fall Monitor; and 3) Change the allowable separation distance between the antenna and all persons from 20cm to 1cm. Intermodulation testing was performed and RF exposure was calculated. 2.2 EUT Exercise Software No special exercise software was used. 2.3 Special Accessories No special accessories were needed to achieve compliance. 2.4 Equipment Modifications No modifications were necessary in order to achieve compliance. Test Report E143013.02 AeroScout Ltd. Page 7 of 24 FCC ACC M Ver 1.2 28 February 2011

2.5 Configuration of Tested System Figure 1. Configuration of Tested System Test Report E143013.02 AeroScout Ltd. Page 8 of 24 FCC ACC M Ver 1.2 28 February 2011

3. Intermodulation Test Set-Up Photos Figure 6. Intermodulation Radiated Test Test Report E143013.02 AeroScout Ltd. Page 9 of 24 FCC ACC M Ver 1.2 28 February 2011

5. Intermodulation Radiated 5.1 Test procedure The power of any emission outside of the authorized operating frequency ranges (916; 2405-2483.5 MHz) must be attenuated below the radiated limit. (a) The E.U.T. operation mode and test set-up are as described in Section 2.5. A preliminary measurement to characterize the E.U.T was performed inside the shielded room at a distance of 3 meters, using peak detection mode and broadband antennas. The preliminary measurements produced a list of the highest emissions. The E.U.T was then transferred to the open site, and placed on a remote-controlled turntable. The E.U.T was placed on a non-metallic table, 0.8 meters above the ground. The configuration tested is shown in Figure 1. The E.U.T. was operated in transmission mode at CW signal. (b) The frequency range 30 MHz-7 GHz was scanned and the list of the highest emissions was verified and updated accordingly. The readings were maximized by adjusting the antenna height between 1-4 meters, the turntable azimuth between 0-360°, and the antenna polarization. The emissions were measured at a distance of 3 meters. In the frequency range 7-26.5 GHz, a spectrum analyzer including a low noise amplifier was used. During average measurements, the IF bandwidth was 1 MHz and the video bandwidth was 10 Hz. During peak measurements, the IF bandwidth was 1 MHz and the video bandwidth was 3 MHz. The EUT was transmitting at the frequencies: 916 and 2442 MHz. 5.2 Test Results JUDGEMENT: Passed TEST PERSONNEL: Tester Signature: _________________ Date: 04.1.15 Typed/Printed Name: I. Siboni Test Report E143013.02 AeroScout Ltd. Page 10 of 24 FCC ACC M Ver 1.2 28 February 2011

Specification: FCC Part 15, Subpart C Antenna Polarization: Horizontal, Vertical Frequency range: 30 MHz to 1000 MHz Antenna: 3 meters distance Detectors: Peak, Quasi-peak Frequency Antenna Azimuth Antenna Peak QP Limit Margin Polarization Height Amp Amp (MHz) Hor. Ver. (Degrees) (cm) (dBµV/m) (dBµV/m) (dBµV/m) (dB) X 258.4 147.6 39.2 33.9 46.5 -12.6 304.35 X 75.1 149.6 39.0 33.9 46.5 -12.6 X 123.1 137.1 36.2 31.1 46.5 -15.4 611.10 X 214.9 135.7 35.7 31.1 46.5 -15.4 Figure 2 Intermodulation Radiated Results –Peak/Quasi Peak Specification: FCC Part 15, Subpart C Antenna Polarization: Horizontal, Vertical Frequency range: 1 GHz to 26.5 GHz Antenna: 3 meters distance Detectors: Peak Frequency Antenna Azimuth Antenna Peak Peak Peak Polarization Height Amp Limit Margin (MHz) Hor. Ver. (Degrees) (cm) (dBµV/m) (dBµV/m) (dB) X 123.1 158.0 55.3 74.0 -18.7 3357.45 X 333.9 134.4 65.9 74.0 -8.1 X 0.0 191.0 58.6 74.0 -15.4 3968.45 X 85.2 106.0 68.4 74.0 -5.6 X 105.1 147.1 60.1 74.0 -13.9 4272.9 X 168.4 194.4 59.6 74.0 -14.4 X 66.9 108.9 65.7 74.0 -8.3 5835.45 X 139.5 160.0 66.1 74.0 -7.9 Figure 3 Intermodulation Radiated Results – Peak Test Report E143013.02 AeroScout Ltd. Page 11 of 24 FCC ACC M Ver 1.2 28 February 2011

Specification: FCC Part 15, Subpart C Antenna Polarization: Horizontal, Vertical Frequency range: 1 GHz to 26.5 GHz Antenna: 3 meters distance Detectors: Average Frequency Antenna Azimuth Antenna AVG AVG AVG Polarization Height Amp Limit Margin (MHz) Hor. Ver. (Degrees) (cm) (dBµV/m) (dBµV/m) (dB) X 123.1 158.0 41.9 54.0 -12.1 3357.45 X 333.9 134.4 41.8 54.0 -12.2 X 0.0 191.0 45.1 54.0 -8.9 3968.45 X 85.2 106.0 45.1 54.0 -8.9 X 105.1 147.1 45.5 54.0 -8.5 4272.9 X 168.4 194.4 45.7 54.0 -8.3 X 66.9 108.9 52.0 54.0 -2.0 5835.45 X 139.5 160.0 51.9 54.0 -2.1 Figure 4 Intermodulation Radiated Results – Average Test Report E143013.02 AeroScout Ltd. Page 12 of 24 FCC ACC M Ver 1.2 28 February 2011

5.3 Test Instrumentation Used; Radiated Measurements Intermodulation Serial Instrument Manufacturer Model Calibration Period Number Spectrum 8592L 3826A01204 February 28, 2014 1 year Analyzer HP Log Biconical 1250 May 22, 2014 2 years Antenna EMCO 3142 Horn Antenna 29845 March 14, 2012 3 years ETS 3115 EMI Receiver R&S ESBI7 100120 December 19, 2013 1 year Low Noise 232 August 29, 2014 1 year Amplifier Sophia Wireless LNA 28-B Low Noise DBS LNA-DBS- 013 August 22, 2014 1 year Amplifier MICROWAVE 0411N313 Antenna Mast N/A N/A ETS 2070-2 - Turntable N/A N/A ETS 2087 - Mast & Table 9608-1456 N/A N/A ETS/EMCO 2090 Controller Figure 5 Test Equipment Used Test Report E143013.02 AeroScout Ltd. Page 13 of 24 FCC ACC M Ver 1.2 28 February 2011

6. R.F Exposure/Safety The TAG1200 is being used in the AeroScout Fall Monitor which also uses a 916 MHz transmitter. Typical use of the Fall Monitor is as a monitor that sends off an alarm when a patient attempts to get out of a wheelchair, bed or commode. The typical placement of the Fall Monitor is on either a chair or a bed. The typical distance between the E.U.T. and the user in the worst case application, is 10 cm. Calculation of Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) Based on Section 1.1310 Requirements (a) FCC limits at 916.00 MHz is: f mW  0.610 2 1500 cm Using table 1 of Section 1.1310 limit for general population/uncontrolled exposures, the above level is an average over 30 minutes. (b) The power density produced by the E.U.T. is Pt Gt S 4R 2 (c ) Top antenna Pt- Transmitted Power 95.5 dBuV/m (Peak) = 1.07 mW GT- Antenna Gain, -5dBi = 0.32 numeric – tests were performed radiated and take gain into account R- Distance from Transmitter using 1 cm worst case Duty Cycle = 0.1% - based on customer’s Duty Cycle Declaration SAVG - Equivalent averaged transmitted power is 1.07 x 0.001 = 0.00107 mW (d) The average power density is: (0.00107) mW S  0.000085 2 4 (1) 2 cm Test Report E143013.02 AeroScout Ltd. Page 14 of 24 FCC ACC M Ver 1.2 28 February 2011

(e) Side antenna: Pt- Transmitted Power 99.6 dBuV/m (Peak) = 2.75 mW GT- Antenna Gain, -2.6dBi = 0.55 numeric – tests were performed radiated and take gain into account R- Distance from Transmitter using 1cm worst case Duty Cycle = 0.1% - based on customer’s Duty Cycle Declaration SAVG - Equivalent averaged transmitted power is 2.75 x 0.001 = 0.00275 mW (f) The average power density is: (0.00275) mW S   0.00022 2 4 (1) 2 cm (g) Combined intermodulated RF 916 MHz Highest Average Transmited Power (using side antenna): Pt- Transmitted Power 99.6 dBuV/m (Peak) = 2.75 mW Duty Cycle = 0.1% - based on customer’s Duty Cycle Declaration SAVG - Equivalent averaged transmitted power is 2.75 x 0.001 = 0.00275 mW 2.4 GHz Average Transmitted Power Pt- Transmitted Power 22.48 dBm (Peak) = 177.01 mW Duty Cycle = 0.1% - based on customer’s Duty Cycle Declaration GT – Antenna Gain, -2.0 dBi = 0.63 SAVG - Equivalent averaged transmitted power is 177.01 x 0.001 = 0.17701 mW R- Distance from Transmitter using 1 cm worst case (0.17701  0.63)  0.00275 mW S   0.009 2 4 (1) 2 cm (h) This is below the FCC limit. Test Report E143013.02 AeroScout Ltd. Page 15 of 24 FCC ACC M Ver 1.2 28 February 2011

7. APPENDIX A - CORRECTION FACTORS 7.1 Correction factors for CABLE from EMI receiver to test antenna at 3 meter range. Cable Cable Frequency Frequency Loss Loss (MHz) (dB) (MHz) (dB) 0.010 0.4 50.00 1.2 0.015 0.2 100.00 0.7 0.020 0.2 150.00 20.1 0.030 0.3 200.00 2.3 0.050 0.3 300.00 2.9 0.075 0.3 500.00 3.8 0.100 0.2 750.00 4.8 0.150 0.2 1000.00 5.4 0.200 0.3 1500.00 6.7 0.500 0.4 2000.00 9.0 1.00 0.4 2500.00 9.4 1.50 0.5 3000.00 9.9 2.00 0.5 3500.00 10.2 5.00 0.6 4000.00 11.2 10.00 0.8 4500.00 12.1 15.00 0.9 5000.00 13.1 20.00 0.8 5500.00 13.5 6000.00 14.5 NOTES: 1. The cable type is SPUMA400 RF-11N(X2) and 39m long 2. The cable is manufactured by Huber + Suhner Test Report E143013.02 AeroScout Ltd. Page 16 of 24 FCC ACC M Ver 1.2 28 February 2011

7.2 Correction factors for CABLE from EMI receiver to test antenna at 3 meter range. FREQUENCY CORRECTION FACTOR (GHz) (dB) 1.0 1.2 2.0 1.6 3.0 2.0 4.0 2.4 5.0 3.0 6.0 3.4 7.0 3.8 8.0 4.2 9.0 4.6 10.0 5.0 12.0 5.8 NOTES: 1. The cable type is RG-8. 2. The overall length of the cable is 10 meters. Test Report E143013.02 AeroScout Ltd. Page 17 of 24 FCC ACC M Ver 1.2 28 February 2011

7.3 Correction factors for CABLE from spectrum analyzer to test antenna above 2.9 GHz FREQUENCY CORRECTION FREQUENCY CORRECTION FACTOR FACTOR (GHz) (dB) (GHz) (dB) 1.0 1.9 14.0 9.1 2.0 2.7 15.0 9.5 3.0 3.5 16.0 9.9 4.0 4.2 17.0 10.2 5.0 4.9 18.0 10.4 6.0 5.5 19.0 10.7 7.0 6.0 20.0 10.9 8.0 6.5 21.0 11.2 9.0 7.0 22.0 11.6 10.0 7.5 23.0 11.9 11.0 7.9 24.0 12.3 12.0 8.3 25.0 12.6 13.0 8.7 26.0 13.0 NOTES: 1. The cable type is SUCOFLEX 104 E manufactured by SUHNER. 2. The cable is used for measurements above 2.9 GHz. 3. The overall length of the cable is 10 meters. Test Report E143013.02 AeroScout Ltd. Page 18 of 24 FCC ACC M Ver 1.2 28 February 2011

8.4 Correction factors for Bilog ANTENNA Model: 3142 Antenna serial number: 1250 3 meter range FREQUENCY AFE FREQUENCY AFE (MHz) (dB/m) (MHz) (dB/m) 30 18.4 1100 25 40 13.7 1200 24.9 50 9.9 1300 26 60 8.1 1400 26.1 70 7.4 1500 27.1 80 7.2 1600 27.2 90 7.5 1700 28.3 100 8.5 1800 28.1 120 7.8 1900 28.5 140 8.5 2000 28.9 160 10.8 180 10.4 200 10.5 250 12.7 300 14.3 400 17 500 18.6 600 19.6 700 21.1 800 21.4 900 23.5 1000 24.3 Test Report E143013.02 AeroScout Ltd. Page 19 of 24 FCC ACC M Ver 1.2 28 February 2011

7.5 Correction factors for Horn ANTENNA. Model: 3115 Antenna serial number: 6142 3 meter range Antenna Antenna FREQUENCY Factor FREQUENCY Factor (MHz) (dB/m) (MHz) (dB/m) 1000 23.9 10500 38.4 1500 25.4 11000 38.5 2000 27.3 11500 39.4 2500 28.5 12000 39.2 3000 30.4 12500 39.4 3500 31.6 13000 40.7 4000 33 14000 42.1 4500 32.7 15000 40.1 5000 34.1 16000 38.2 5500 34.5 17000 41.7 6000 34.9 17500 45.7 6500 35.1 18000 47.7 7000 35.9 7500 37.5 8000 37.6 8500 38.3 9000 38.5 9500 38.1 10000 38.6 Test Report E143013.02 AeroScout Ltd. Page 20 of 24 FCC ACC M Ver 1.2 28 February 2011

7.6 Correction factors for LOG PERIODIC ANTENNA Type LPD 2010/A at 3 and 10 meter ranges. Distance of 3 meters Distance of 10 meters FREQUENCY AFE FREQUENCY AFE (MHz) (dB/m) (MHz) (dB/m) 200.0 9.1 200.0 9.0 250.0 10.2 250.0 10.1 300.0 12.5 300.0 11.8 400.0 15.4 400.0 15.3 500.0 16.1 500.0 15.6 600.0 19.2 600.0 18.7 700.0 19.4 700.0 19.1 800.0 19.9 800.0 20.2 900.0 21.2 900.0 21.1 1000.0 23.5 1000.0 23.2 NOTES: 1. Antenna serial number is 1038. 2. The above lists are located in file number 38M3O.ANT for a 3 meter range, and file number 38M100.ANT for a 10 meter range. 3. The files mentioned above are located on the disk marked "Radiated Emission Test EMI Receiver". Test Report E143013.02 AeroScout Ltd. Page 21 of 24 FCC ACC M Ver 1.2 28 February 2011

7.7 Correction factors for Double-Ridged Waveguide Horn Model: 3115, S/N 29845 at 3 meter range. FREQUENCY ANTENNA ANTENNA FREQUENCY ANTENNA ANTENNA FACTOR Gain FACTOR Gain (GHz) (dB 1/m) (dBi) (GHz) (dB 1/m) (dBi) 1.0 24.8 5.4 10.0 38.8 11.4 1.5 26.1 7.6 10.5 38.9 11.8 2.0 28.6 7.7 11.0 39.0 12.1 2.5 29.8 8.4 11.5 39.6 11.8 3.0 31.4 8.4 12.0 39.8 12.0 3.5 32.4 8.7 12.5 39.6 12.5 4.0 33.7 8.6 13.0 40.0 12.5 4.5 33.4 9.9 13.5 39.8 13.0 5.0 34.5 9.7 14.0 40.2 13.0 5.5 35.1 9.9 14.5 40.6 12.9 6.0 35.4 10.4 15.0 41.3 12.4 6.5 35.6 10.8 15.5 39.5 14.6 7.0 36.2 10.9 16.0 38.8 15.5 7.5 37.3 10.4 16.5 40.0 14.6 8.0 37.7 10.6 17.0 41.4 13.4 8.5 38.3 10.5 17.5 44.8 10.3 9.0 38.5 10.8 18.0 47.2 8.1 9.5 38.7 11.1 Test Report E143013.02 AeroScout Ltd. Page 22 of 24 FCC ACC M Ver 1.2 28 February 2011

7.8 Correction factors for ACTIVE LOOP ANTENNA Model 6502 S/N 9506-2950 Magnetic Electric FREQUENCY Antenna Antenna Factor Factor (MHz) (dB) (dB) .009 -35.1 16.4 .010 -35.7 15.8 .020 -38.5 13.0 .050 -39.6 11.9 .075 -39.8 11.8 .100 -40.0 11.6 .150 -40.0 11.5 .250 -40.0 11.6 .500 -40.0 11.5 .750 -40.1 11.5 1.000 -39.9 11.7 2.000 -39.5 12.0 3.000 -39.4 12.1 4.000 -39.7 11.9 5.000 -39.7 11.8 10.000 40.2 11.3 15.000 -40.7 10.8 20.000 -40.5 11.0 25.000 -41.3 10.2 30.000 42.3 9.2 Test Report E143013.02 AeroScout Ltd. Page 23 of 24 FCC ACC M Ver 1.2 28 February 2011

8. Comparison Industry Canada Requirements With FCC AeroScout TAG-1200 Bi-Directional WiFi Module M/N: TAG-12000 IC: 5115A-TAG1200 FCC ID: Q3HTAG1200 Test FCC IC  Radiated 15.209 RSS 210 Issue 8 Emission Clause 2.5  Max power / 15.247(b)(3) RSS 210 Issue 8 Peak power A8.4(4)  6dB BW 15.247(a)2 RSS 210 Issue 8 A8.2a  Power 15.247(e) RSS 210 Issue 8 A8.2b density  Spurious 15.205(c) RSS 210 Issue 8 2.5 radiated RSS Gen 7.2.2 emission in (Table 1) the restricted band  Band edge 15.247(d) RSS 210 Issue 8 A8.5 spectrum  RF Exposure 1.1307(b)(1) RSS 102 4.4 Limits Test Report E143013.02 AeroScout Ltd. Page 24 of 24 FCC ACC M Ver 1.2 28 February 2011


Document Created: 2015-05-07 14:00:59
Document Modified: 2015-05-07 14:00:59
© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC