PD test report 2

FCC ID: PY319100441

RF Exposure Info

Download: PDF

FCCID_4280723

Revision history

Revision Date Description
A May 07, 2019 Initial release
B May 14, 2019 Correction in SAR tables

80-W5669-2 Rev. B MAY CONTAIN U.S. AND INTERNATIONAL EXPORT CONTROLLED INFORMATION 2

Contents

1 Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 5

2 Tx Varying Transmission Test Cases and Test Proposal .................................................... 6

3 PD Time Averaging Validation Test Procedures ................................................................... 9
3.1 Test sequence for validation in mmW NR transmission ............................................................................. 9
3.2 Test configuration selection criteria for validating smart transmit algorithm ............................................... 9
3.2.1 Test configuration selection for time-varying Tx power transmission ........................................ 9
3.2.2 Test configuration selection for change in antenna configuration (beam) ................................. 9
3.2.3 Test configuration selection for SAR vs. PD exposure switch during
transmission ........................................................................................................................ 9
3.3 Test procedures for radiated power measurements................................................................................. 10
3.3.1 Time-varying Tx power scenario ............................................................................................. 10
3.3.2 Switch in SAR vs. PD exposure during transmission .............................................................. 11
3.3.3 Change in antenna configuration (beam)................................................................................ 13
3.4 Test procedure for PD measurements ..................................................................................................... 15

4 Test Configurations ............................................................................................................... 17
4.1 LTE + mmW NR transmission.................................................................................................................. 17

5 Radiated Power Test Results for mmW Smart Transmit Algorithm Validation................ 18
5.1 WWAN (sub-6) transmission .................................................................................................................... 18
5.2 Measurement Setup................................................................................................................................. 18
5.3 Radiated power test results ..................................................................................................................... 20
5.3.1 Maximum transmit power test results for n260 ....................................................................... 20
5.3.2 Switch in SAR vs. PD exposure test results for n260 ............................................................. 22
5.3.3 Change in Beam test results for n260 .................................................................................... 23

6 PD Test Results for mmW Smart Transmit Algorithm Validation...................................... 25
6.1 Measurement setup ................................................................................................................................. 25
6.2 PD measurement results for maximum power transmission scenario...................................................... 27
6.2.1 PD test results for n260 .......................................................................................................... 27

7 Conclusions ........................................................................................................................... 29

A Appendix A: PD Measurement System Validation ............................................................. 30
A.1 Test environment ..................................................................................................................................... 30
A.2 Power density measurement system ....................................................................................................... 30
A.2.1 Power density probe .............................................................................................................. 31
A.2.2 Power density measurement system verification ................................................................... 31

B Test Procedure for Time-Averaged PD Measurement Using cDASY6 ............................. 33

80-W5669-2 Rev. B MAY CONTAIN U.S. AND INTERNATIONAL EXPORT CONTROLLED INFORMATION 3

Netgear 5G MHS Travel Router (FCC ID: PY319100441) RF Exposure Compliance Test Report (Part 2: Test Under Dynamic
Transmission Scenario) Contents
Figures

Figure 3-1: Running time averaging illustration ............................................................................................................ 11
Figure 5-1 Radiated power measurement setup ......................................................................................................... 19
Figure 6-1 Worst-surface of EUT positioned for the mmW beam being tested ............................................................ 26
Figure 6-2 PD measurement setup .............................................................................................................................. 26

Tables

Table 4-1 Selections for LTE + mmW NR validation measurements .......................................................................... 17
Table 4-2: Test configuration for LTE + mmW NR validation ....................................................................................... 17
Table 5-1: Worst-case 1gSAR, 4cm2 avg. PD and EIRP measured at input.power.limit of the selected configurations
..................................................................................................................................................................................... 20

80-W5669-2 Rev. B MAY CONTAIN U.S. AND INTERNATIONAL EXPORT CONTROLLED INFORMATION 4

1 Introduction

The equipment under test (EUT) is Netgear 5G MHS Travel Router (FCC ID: PY319100441), it
contains the Qualcomm® SM8150 modem supporting 2G/3G/4G technologies and SDX50
modem supporting mmW 5G NR bands. Both of these modems are enabled with Qualcomm
Smart Transmit feature to control and manage transmitting power in real time and to ensure at all
times the time-averaged RF exposure is in compliance with the FCC requirement.
This purpose of the Part 2 report is to demonstrate the EUT complies with FCC RF exposure
requirement under Tx varying transmission scenarios, thereby validity of Qualcomm Smart
Transmit feature for FCC equipment authorization of Netgear 5G MHS Travel Router (FCC ID:
PY319100441).
The Plimit and input.power.limit used in this Part 2 report is determined and listed in Part 0 report.
Refer to Compliance summary report for EUT description and terminology used in this report.

80-W5669-2 Rev. B MAY CONTAIN U.S. AND INTERNATIONAL EXPORT CONTROLLED INFORMATION 5

Netgear 5G MHS Travel Router (FCC ID: PY319100441) RF Exposure Compliance Test Report (Part 2: Test Under Dynamic
Transmission Scenario) Tx Varying Transmission Test Cases and Test Proposal

2 Tx Varying Transmission Test Cases and
Test Proposal

In general, to validate power enforcement by Smart Transmit and demonstrate the compliance in
Tx varying transmission conditions, the following test cases are proposed and agreed by FCC:
1. During a time-varying Tx power transmission: To prove that the Smart Transmit algorithm
accounts for Tx power variations in time accurately.
2. During a call disconnect and reestablish scenario in 2G/3G/4G technology: To prove that the
Smart Transmit algorithm accounts for history of past Tx power transmissions accurately.
3. During technology/band handover within 2G/3G/4G technology: To prove that the Smart
Transmit algorithm functions correctly during transitions in technology/band.
4. During antenna (or beam) switch: To prove that the Smart Transmit algorithm functions
correctly during transitions in antenna (such as AsDiv scenario) or beams (different antenna
array configurations).
5. SAR vs. PD exposure switching during sub-6+mmW transmission: To prove that the Smart
Transmit algorithm functions correctly and ensures total RF exposure compliance during
transitions in SAR only exposure, SAR+PD exposure, and PD only exposure scenarios.
As shown in Table 4-1 of Section 4.1 Part 1 report, since maximum time-averaged power level
Plimit ≥ Pmax (maximum RF tune-up output power) for all sub-6 radios supported for this EUT, the
power limiting will not be enforced from Smart Transmit when only sub-6 radio is active. Hence,
the validation for sub-6 radio is not required for this EUT when only sub-6 radio is active.
The test case 1, 4 and 5 are performed in this Part 2 report for 5G mmW NR band 260 with LTE
B2 as anchor.
For a SAR-and PD-characterized wireless device, RF exposure is proportional to the Tx power.
Thus, algorithm validation in Part 2 can be effectively performed through conducted (for f <
6GHz) and radiated (for f ≥ 6GHz) power measurement. Therefore, the validation is done in
power measurement setup for test cases 1, 4 and 5.
To add confidence in the algorithm validation, the time-averaged SAR and PD measurements are
also performed, but they are only performed for test case 1 to avoid the complexity in SAR/PD
measurement.
The strategy for testing in Tx varying transmission condition is outlined as follows:
■ Demonstrate the total RF exposure averaged over FCC defined time windows does not
exceed FCC’s SAR and PD limits, through time-averaged power measurements
□ Measure conducted Tx power (for f < 6GHz) versus time, and radiated Tx power (EIRP
for f > 6GHz) versus time.
□ Convert it into RF exposure and divide by respective FCC limits to get normalized
exposure versus time.
□ Perform running time-averaging over FCC defined time windows.

80-W5669-2 Rev. B MAY CONTAIN U.S. AND INTERNATIONAL EXPORT CONTROLLED INFORMATION 6

Netgear 5G MHS Travel Router (FCC ID: PY319100441) RF Exposure Compliance Test Report (Part 2: Test Under Dynamic
Transmission Scenario) Tx Varying Transmission Test Cases and Test Proposal
□ Demonstrate that the total normalized time-averaged RF exposure is less than 1 for all
transmission scenarios (i.e., test case 1, 4, and 5) at all times.
Mathematical expression:
For LTE+mmW transmission:

𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑑𝑢𝑐𝑡𝑒𝑑_𝑇𝑥_𝑝𝑜𝑤𝑒𝑟(𝑡)
1𝑔_𝑜𝑟_10𝑔𝑆𝐴𝑅(𝑡) = ∗ 1𝑔_𝑜𝑟_10𝑔𝑆𝐴𝑅_𝑃𝑙𝑖𝑚𝑖𝑡 (1a)
𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑑𝑢𝑐𝑡𝑒𝑑_𝑇𝑥_𝑝𝑜𝑤𝑒𝑟_𝑃𝑙𝑖𝑚𝑖𝑡

𝑟𝑎𝑑𝑖𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑑_𝑇𝑥_𝑝𝑜𝑤𝑒𝑟(𝑡)
4𝑐𝑚2 𝑃𝐷(𝑡) = ∗ 4𝑐𝑚2 𝑃𝐷_𝑖𝑛𝑝𝑢𝑡. 𝑝𝑜𝑤𝑒𝑟. 𝑙𝑖𝑚𝑖𝑡 (1b)
𝑟𝑎𝑑𝑖𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑑_𝑇𝑥_𝑝𝑜𝑤𝑒𝑟_𝑖𝑛𝑝𝑢𝑡.𝑝𝑜𝑤𝑒𝑟.𝑙𝑖𝑚𝑖𝑡

1 𝑡 1 𝑡
∫
𝑇𝑆𝐴𝑅 𝑡−𝑇𝑆𝐴𝑅
1𝑔_𝑜𝑟_10𝑔𝑆𝐴𝑅(𝑡)𝑑𝑡 ∫ 4𝑐𝑚2 𝑃𝐷(𝑡)𝑑𝑡
𝑇𝑃𝐷 𝑡−𝑇𝑃𝐷
+ ≤1 (1c)
𝐹𝐶𝐶 𝑆𝐴𝑅 𝑙𝑖𝑚𝑖𝑡 𝐹𝐶𝐶 4𝑐𝑚2 𝑃𝐷 𝑙𝑖𝑚𝑖𝑡

where, 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑑𝑢𝑐𝑡𝑒𝑑_𝑇𝑥_𝑝𝑜𝑤𝑒𝑟(𝑡), 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑑𝑢𝑐𝑡𝑒𝑑_𝑇𝑥_𝑝𝑜𝑤𝑒𝑟_𝑃𝑙𝑖𝑚𝑖𝑡 , and
1𝑔_𝑜𝑟_10𝑔𝑆𝐴𝑅_𝑃𝑙𝑖𝑚𝑖𝑡 correspond to the measured instantaneous conducted Tx
power, measured conducted Tx power at Plimit, and measured 1gSAR or 10gSAR
values at Plimit. Similarly,
𝑟𝑎𝑑𝑖𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑑_𝑇𝑥_𝑝𝑜𝑤𝑒𝑟(𝑡), 𝑟𝑎𝑑𝑖𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑑_𝑇𝑥_𝑝𝑜𝑤𝑒𝑟_𝑖𝑛𝑝𝑢𝑡. 𝑝𝑜𝑤𝑒𝑟. 𝑙𝑖𝑚𝑖𝑡, and
4𝑐𝑚2 𝑃𝐷_𝑖𝑛𝑝𝑢𝑡. 𝑝𝑜𝑤𝑒𝑟. 𝑙𝑖𝑚𝑖𝑡 correspond to the measured instantaneous radiated Tx
power, radiated Tx power at input.power.limit (i.e., radiated power limit), and
4cm2PD value at input.power.limit. Both Plimit and input.power.limit are the
parameters pre-defined in Part 0 report and entered through EFS. TSAR is the time
window for sub-6 radio defined by FCC; TPD is the time window for mmW radio
defined by FCC.

NOTE: If Plimit ≥ Pmax, 1gSAR or 10gSAR measured at Plimit shall be replaced with 1gSAR or 10gSAR
measured at Pmax.

■ Demonstrate the total RF exposure averaged over FCC defined time windows does not
exceed FCC’s SAR and PD limits, through time-averaged PD measurements. Note as
mentioned earlier, this measurement is performed for test case 1 only.
□ For LTE + mmW transmission, measure instantaneous E-field versus time for mmW
radio and instantaneous conducted power versus time for LTE radio.
□ Convert it into RF exposure and divide by respective FCC limits to get normalized
exposure versus time.
□ Perform time averaging over FCC defined time windows.
□ Demonstrate that the total normalized time-averaged RF exposure is less than 1 for test
case 1 at all times.
Mathematical expression:
For LTE+mmW transmission:
𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑑𝑢𝑐𝑡𝑒𝑑_𝑇𝑥_𝑝𝑜𝑤𝑒𝑟(𝑡)
1𝑔_𝑜𝑟_10𝑔𝑆𝐴𝑅(𝑡) = ∗ 1𝑔_𝑜𝑟_10𝑔𝑆𝐴𝑅_𝑃𝑙𝑖𝑚𝑖𝑡 (2a)
𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑑𝑢𝑐𝑡𝑒𝑑_𝑇𝑥_𝑝𝑜𝑤𝑒𝑟_𝑃𝑙𝑖𝑚𝑖𝑡

[𝑝𝑜𝑖𝑛𝑡𝐸(𝑡)]2
4𝑐𝑚2 𝑃𝐷(𝑡) = [𝑝𝑜𝑖𝑛𝑡𝐸_𝑖𝑛𝑝𝑢𝑡.𝑝𝑜𝑤𝑒𝑟.𝑙𝑖𝑚𝑖𝑡]2
∗ 4𝑐𝑚2 𝑃𝐷_𝑖𝑛𝑝𝑢𝑡. 𝑝𝑜𝑤𝑒𝑟. 𝑙𝑖𝑚𝑖𝑡 (2b)

80-W5669-2 Rev. B MAY CONTAIN U.S. AND INTERNATIONAL EXPORT CONTROLLED INFORMATION 7

Netgear 5G MHS Travel Router (FCC ID: PY319100441) RF Exposure Compliance Test Report (Part 2: Test Under Dynamic
Transmission Scenario) Tx Varying Transmission Test Cases and Test Proposal
1 𝑡 1 𝑡
∫
𝑇𝑆𝐴𝑅 𝑡−𝑇𝑆𝐴𝑅
1𝑔_𝑜𝑟_10𝑔𝑆𝐴𝑅(𝑡)𝑑𝑡 ∫ 4𝑐𝑚2 𝑃𝐷(𝑡)𝑑𝑡
𝑇𝑃𝐷 𝑡−𝑇𝑃𝐷
+ ≤1 (2c)
𝐹𝐶𝐶 𝑆𝐴𝑅 𝑙𝑖𝑚𝑖𝑡 𝐹𝐶𝐶 4𝑐𝑚2 𝑃𝐷 𝑙𝑖𝑚𝑖𝑡

where, 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑑𝑢𝑐𝑡𝑒𝑑_𝑇𝑥_𝑝𝑜𝑤𝑒𝑟(𝑡), 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑑𝑢𝑐𝑡𝑒𝑑_𝑇𝑥_𝑝𝑜𝑤𝑒𝑟_𝑃𝑙𝑖𝑚𝑖𝑡 , and
1𝑔_𝑜𝑟_10𝑔𝑆𝐴𝑅_𝑃𝑙𝑖𝑚𝑖𝑡 correspond to the measured instantaneous conducted Tx
power, measured conducted Tx power at Plimit, and measured 1gSAR or 10gSAR
values at Plimit. Similarly, 𝑝𝑜𝑖𝑛𝑡𝐸(𝑡), 𝑝𝑜𝑖𝑛𝑡𝐸_𝑖𝑛𝑝𝑢𝑡. 𝑝𝑜𝑤𝑒𝑟. 𝑙𝑖𝑚𝑖𝑡, and
4𝑐𝑚2 𝑃𝐷_𝑖𝑛𝑝𝑢𝑡. 𝑝𝑜𝑤𝑒𝑟. 𝑙𝑖𝑚𝑖𝑡 correspond to the measured instantaneous E-field, E-
field measured at input.power.limit, and 4cm2PD value measured at
input.power.limit.

NOTE: If Plimit ≥ Pmax, 1gSAR or 10gSAR measured at Plimit shall be replaced with 1gSAR or 10gSAR
measured at Pmax.

[𝑝𝑜𝑖𝑛𝑡𝐸(𝑡)]2
NOTE: cDASY6 system measures relative E-field, and provides ratio of [𝑝𝑜𝑖𝑛𝑡𝐸_𝑖𝑛𝑝𝑢𝑡.𝑝𝑜𝑤𝑒𝑟.𝑙𝑖𝑚𝑖𝑡]2 versus
time. See Appendix B for time-averaged PD measurement details.

80-W5669-2 Rev. B MAY CONTAIN U.S. AND INTERNATIONAL EXPORT CONTROLLED INFORMATION 8

3 PD Time Averaging Validation Test
Procedures

This section provides the test plan and test procedures for validating Qualcomm Smart Transmit
algorithm for mmW transmission. For this EUT, millimeter wave (mmW) transmission is only in
non-standalone mode, i.e., it requires a sub-6 LTE link as anchor.

3.1 Test sequence for validation in mmW NR transmission
In 5G mmW NR transmission, the test sequence for validation is with the callbox requesting EUT
to transmit in 5G mmW NR at maximum power all the time.

3.2 Test configuration selection criteria for validating smart
transmit algorithm

3.2.1 Test configuration selection for time-varying Tx power
transmission
The Smart Transmit time averaging algorithm operation is independent of bands, modes,
channels, and antenna configurations (beams) for a given technology. Hence, validation of Smart
Transmit in any one band/mode/channel/beam per technology is sufficient.

3.2.2 Test configuration selection for change in antenna configuration
(beam)
The Smart Transmit time averaging algorithm operation is independent of bands, modes,
channels, and antenna configurations (beams) for a given technology. Hence, validation of Smart
Transmit with beam switch between any two beams is sufficient.

3.2.3 Test configuration selection for SAR vs. PD exposure switch
during transmission
The Smart Transmit time averaging algorithm operation is independent of the nature of exposure
(SAR vs. PD) and ensures total time-averaged RF exposure compliance. Hence, validation of
Smart Transmit in any one band/mode/channel/beam for mmW + sub-6 (LTE) transmission is
sufficient, where the exposure varies among SAR dominant scenario, SAR+PD scenario, and PD
dominant scenario.

80-W5669-2 Rev. B MAY CONTAIN U.S. AND INTERNATIONAL EXPORT CONTROLLED INFORMATION 9

Netgear 5G MHS Travel Router (FCC ID: PY319100441) RF Exposure Compliance Test Report (Part 2: Test Under Dynamic
Transmission Scenario) PD Time Averaging Validation Test Procedures
3.3 Test procedures for radiated power measurements
The test procedures for performing conducted power measurement (for f < 6GHz) and radiated
power measurement (for f > 6GHz) for LTE + mmW transmission to validate Smart Transmit
time averaging algorithm in the various transmission scenarios are described in this section.

3.3.1 Time-varying Tx power scenario
The purpose of the test is to demonstrate the effectiveness of power limiting enforcement and that
the time-averaged transmit power when converted into RF exposure values does not exceed the
FCC limit at all times (see Eq. (1a), (1b) & (1c) in Section 2).

Test procedure:
1. Measure conducted Tx power corresponding to Plimit for LTE in selected band, and measure
radiated Tx power corresponding to input.power.limit in desired mmW band/channel/beam.
Test condition to measure conducted Plimit and radiated input.power.limit is:
2. Measure radiated power corresponding to mmW input.power.limit by setting up the EUT to
transmit in desired band/channel/beam at input.power.limit in Factory Test Mode (FTM).
This test is performed in a calibrated anechoic chamber. Rotate the EUT to obtain maximum
radiated Tx power, keep the EUT in this position and do not disturb the position of the EUT
inside the anechoic chamber for the rest of this test.
3. Reset EUT to place in online mode and establish radio link in LTE, measure conducted Tx
power corresponding to LTE Plimit with Smart Transmit enabled and Reserve_power_margin
set to 0 dB, callbox set to request maximum power.
4. Set Reserve_power_margin to actual value (i.e., intended value) and reset power on EUT to
enable Smart Transmit. With EUT setup for a mmW NR call in the desired/selected LTE
band and mmW NR band/beam, perform the following steps:
a. Establish LTE (sub-6) and mmW NR connection. As soon as the mmW connection is
established, immediately request all-down bits on LTE link. With callbox requesting
EUT to transmit at maximum mmW power to test predominantly PD exposure scenario
(as SAR exposure is less when LTE transmits at low power).
b. After 120s, request LTE to go all-up bits for at least 100s. SAR exposure is dominant.
There are two scenarios:
i If Plimit < Pmax, then the RF exposure margin (to mmW NR) gradually run out of (due
to high SAR exposure), the 5G NR mmW transmission power should be gradually
reduced accordingly and eventually seized when LTE goes to Preserve level.
ii If Plimit ≥ Pmax, then the 5G NR mmW transmission averaged power should gradually
reduce but the mmW NR connection can sustain all the time (assuming TxAGC
uncertainty = 0dB).
c. Record the conducted Tx power of LTE and radiated Tx power of mmW NR for the full
duration of this test of ~ 300s or longer.
5. Once the measurement is done, extract instantaneous Tx power versus time for both LTE and
mmW links. Convert the conducted Tx power for LTE into 1gSAR value using Eq. (1a) and
Plimit measured in Step 1.b, and then divide by FCC limit of 1.6 W/kg for 1gSAR to obtain
instantaneous normalized 1gSAR versus time. Perform 100s running average to determine
normalized 100s-averaged 1gSAR versus time as illustrated in Figure 5-1.

80-W5669-2 Rev. B MAY CONTAIN U.S. AND INTERNATIONAL EXPORT CONTROLLED INFORMATION 10

Netgear 5G MHS Travel Router (FCC ID: PY319100441) RF Exposure Compliance Test Report (Part 2: Test Under Dynamic
Transmission Scenario) PD Time Averaging Validation Test Procedures
band/channel/beam. Test condition to measure conducted Plimit and radiated input.power.limit
is:
2. Measure radiated power corresponding to mmW input.power.limit by setting up the EUT to
transmit in desired band/channel/beam at input.power.limit in FTM. This test is performed in
a calibrated anechoic chamber. Rotate the EUT to obtain maximum radiated Tx power, keep
the EUT in this position and do not disturb the position of the EUT inside the anechoic
chamber for the rest of this test.
3. Reset EUT to place in online mode and establish radio link in LTE, measure conducted Tx
power corresponding to LTE Plimit with Smart Transmit enabled and Reserve_power_margin
set to 0 dB, callbox set to request maximum power.
4. Set Reserve_power_margin to actual value (intended value) and reset power in EUT, With
EUT setup for LTE (sub-6) + mmW NR call, perform the following steps:
5. Establish LTE (sub-6) and mmW NR connection with callbox.
6. As soon as the mmW connection is established, immediately request all-down bits on LTE
link. Continue LTE (all-down bits) + mmW transmission for more than 100s duration to test
predominantly PD exposure scenario (as SAR exposure is negligible from all-down bits in
LTE).
7. After 120s, request LTE to go all-up bits, mmW transmission should gradually run out of RF
exposure margin if Plimit < Pmax and seize mmW transmission (SAR only scenario); or mmW
transmission should gradually reduce in Tx power if Plimit > Pmax and will sustain the
connection, in this case there will be no SAR exposure only scenario when the EUT is in EN-
DC mode.
8. After 75s, request LTE to go all-down bits, mmW transmission should start getting RF
exposure margin and gradually transmit at high averaged power again.
9. Record the conducted Tx power of LTE and radiated Tx power of mmW for the entire
duration of this test of ~300s or longer.
10. Once the measurement is done, extract instantaneous Tx power versus time for both LTE and
mmW links. Convert the conducted Tx power for LTE into 1gSAR value using Eq. (1a) and
Plimit measured in Step 1.b, and then divide by FCC limit of 1.6 W/kg for 1gSAR to obtain
instantaneous normalized 1gSAR versus time. Perform 100s running average to determine
normalized 100s-averaged 1gSAR versus time.

NOTE: In Eq.(1a), instantaneous Tx power is converted into instantaneous 1gSAR value by applying the
corresponding worst-case 1gSAR value measured at Plimit for the technology/band/antenna/DSI
reported in Part 1 report.

11. Similarly, convert the radiated Tx power for mmW NR into 4cm2PD value using Eq. (1b) and
the radiated Tx power limit (i.e., radiated Tx power measured at input.power.limit) measured
in Step 1.a, then divide this by FCC 4cm2PD limit of 10W/m2 to obtain instantaneous
normalized 4cm2PD versus time. Perform 4s running average to determine normalized 4s-
averaged 4cm2PD versus time.

NOTE: In Eq.(2b), instantaneous radiated Tx power is converted into instantaneous 4cm2PD by applying
the corresponding worst-case 4cm2PD value measured at input.power.limit for the selected
band/beam in Part 1 report.

80-W5669-2 Rev. B MAY CONTAIN U.S. AND INTERNATIONAL EXPORT CONTROLLED INFORMATION 12

Netgear 5G MHS Travel Router (FCC ID: PY319100441) RF Exposure Compliance Test Report (Part 2: Test Under Dynamic
Transmission Scenario) PD Time Averaging Validation Test Procedures
12. Make one plot containing: (a) instantaneous conducted Tx power for LTE versus time, (b)
computed 100s-averaged conducted Tx power for LTE versus time, (c) instantaneous radiated
Tx power for mmW versus time, as measured in Step 2, (d) computed 4s-averaged radiated
Tx power for mmW versus time, and (e) time-averaged conducted and radiated power limits
for LTE and mmW radio, respectively.
13. Make another plot containing: (a) computed normalized 100s-averaged 1gSAR versus time
determined in Step 3, (b) computed normalized 4s-averaged 4cm2PD versus time determined
in Step 4, and (c) corresponding total normalized time-averaged RF exposure (sum of steps
(6.a) and (6.b)) versus time.
The validation criteria is, at all times, the total normalized time-averaged RF exposure versus
time determined in Step 6.c shall not exceed the normalized limit of 1.0 of FCC requirement (i.e.,
Eq. (1c)).

3.3.3 Change in antenna configuration (beam)
This test is to demonstrate the correct power control by Smart Transmit during changes in
antenna configuration (beam). Since the input.power.limit varies with beam, the Eq. (1a), (1b)
and (1c) in Section 2 are written as below for transmission scenario having change in beam,
𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑑𝑢𝑐𝑡𝑒𝑑_𝑇𝑥_𝑝𝑜𝑤𝑒𝑟(𝑡)
1𝑔_𝑜𝑟_10𝑔𝑆𝐴𝑅(𝑡) = ∗ 1𝑔_𝑜𝑟_10𝑔𝑆𝐴𝑅_𝑃𝑙𝑖𝑚𝑖𝑡 (3a)
𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑑𝑢𝑐𝑡𝑒𝑑_𝑇𝑥_𝑝𝑜𝑤𝑒𝑟_𝑃𝑙𝑖𝑚𝑖𝑡

𝑟𝑎𝑑𝑖𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑑_𝑇𝑥_𝑝𝑜𝑤𝑒𝑟_1(𝑡)
4𝑐𝑚2 𝑃𝐷1 (𝑡) = ∗ 4𝑐𝑚2 𝑃𝐷_𝑖𝑛𝑝𝑢𝑡. 𝑝𝑜𝑤𝑒𝑟. 𝑙𝑖𝑚𝑖𝑡_1
𝑟𝑎𝑑𝑖𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑑_𝑇𝑥_𝑝𝑜𝑤𝑒𝑟_𝑖𝑛𝑝𝑢𝑡.𝑝𝑜𝑤𝑒𝑟.𝑙𝑖𝑚𝑖𝑡_1
(3b)

𝑟𝑎𝑑𝑖𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑑_𝑇𝑥_𝑝𝑜𝑤𝑒𝑟_2(𝑡)
4𝑐𝑚2 𝑃𝐷2 (𝑡) = ∗ 4𝑐𝑚2 𝑃𝐷_𝑖𝑛𝑝𝑢𝑡. 𝑝𝑜𝑤𝑒𝑟. 𝑙𝑖𝑚𝑖𝑡_2
𝑟𝑎𝑑𝑖𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑑_𝑇𝑥_𝑝𝑜𝑤𝑒𝑟_𝑖𝑛𝑝𝑢𝑡.𝑝𝑜𝑤𝑒𝑟.𝑙𝑖𝑚𝑖𝑡_2
(3c)

1 𝑡 1 𝑡 𝑡
∫
𝑇𝑆𝐴𝑅 𝑡−𝑇𝑆𝐴𝑅
1𝑔_𝑜𝑟_10𝑔𝑆𝐴𝑅(𝑡)𝑑𝑡 [∫ 1 4𝑐𝑚2 PD1 (𝑡)𝑑𝑡+∫𝑡1 4𝑐𝑚2 PD2 (𝑡)𝑑𝑡]
𝑇𝑃𝐷 𝑡−𝑇𝑃𝐷
+ ≤1 (3d)
𝐹𝐶𝐶 𝑆𝐴𝑅 𝑙𝑖𝑚𝑖𝑡 𝐹𝐶𝐶 4𝑐𝑚2 𝑃𝐷 𝑙𝑖𝑚𝑖𝑡

where, radiated_Tx_power_1(t), radiated_Tx_power_input.power.limit_1, and
4cm2PD_input.power.limit_1 correspond to the instantaneous radiated Tx power, radiated Tx
power measured at input.power.limit, and 4cm2PD measured at input.power.limit of beam 1;
radiated_Tx_power_2(t), radiated_Tx_power_input.power.limit_2, and
4cm2PD_input.power.limit_2 correspond to the instantaneous radiated Tx power, radiated Tx
power measured at input.power.limit, and 4cm2PD measured at input.power.limit of beam 2.

NOTE: If Plimit ≥ Pmax, 1gSAR measured at Plimit shall be replaced with 1gSAR measured at Pmax.

Test procedure:
1. Measure conducted Tx power corresponding to Plimit for LTE in selected band/channel/DSI,
and measure radiated Tx power corresponding to input.power.limit in desired mmW

80-W5669-2 Rev. B MAY CONTAIN U.S. AND INTERNATIONAL EXPORT CONTROLLED INFORMATION 13

Netgear 5G MHS Travel Router (FCC ID: PY319100441) RF Exposure Compliance Test Report (Part 2: Test Under Dynamic
Transmission Scenario) PD Time Averaging Validation Test Procedures
band/channel/beam. Test condition to measure conducted Plimit and radiated input.power.limit
is:
2. Measure radiated power corresponding to mmW input.power.limit by setting up the EUT to
transmit in desired band/channel for beam 1 at input.power.limit in FTM. Do not disturb the
position of the EUT inside the anechoic chamber for the rest of this test. Repeat this Step 1.a
for beam 2.
3. Reset EUT to place in online mode and establish radio link in LTE, measure conducted Tx
power corresponding to LTE Plimit with Smart Transmit enabled and Reserve_power_margin
set to 0 dB, callbox set to request maximum power.
4. Set Reserve_power_margin to actual value (intended value) and reset power in EUT, With
EUT setup for LTE (sub-6) + mmW connection, perform the following steps:
5. Establish LTE (sub-6) and mmW NR connection in beam1. As soon as the mmW connection
is established, immediately request all-down bits on LTE link with the callbox requesting
EUT to transmit at maximum mmW power.
6. After beam 1 transmits for at least 20s, request the EUT to change from beam 1 to beam 2,
and continue transmitting with beam 2 for at least 20s.
7. Record the conducted Tx power of LTE and radiated Tx power of mmW for the entire
duration of this test.
8. Once the measurement is done, extract instantaneous Tx power versus time for both LTE and
mmW links. Convert the conducted Tx power for LTE into 1gSAR value using the similar
approach described in Step 3 of Section 3.3.2. Perform 100s running average to determine
normalized 100s-averaged 1gSAR versus time.
9. Similarly, convert the radiated Tx power for mmW NR into 4cm2PD value using Eq. (3b),
(3c) and the radiated Tx power limits (i.e., radiated Tx power measured at input.power.limit)
measured in Step 1.a for beam 1 and beam 2, respectively, and then divide the resulted PD
values by FCC 4cm2PD limit of 10W/m2 to obtain instantaneous normalized 4cm2PD versus
time for beam 1 and beam 2. Perform 4s running average to determine normalized 4s-
averaged 4cm2PD versus time.

NOTE: In Eq.(3b) and (3c), instantaneous radiated Tx power of beam 1 and beam 2 is converted into
instantaneous 4cm2PD by applying the corresponding worst-case 4cm2PD value measured at the
input.power.limit of beam 1 and beam 2 in Part 1 report.

10. Since the measured radiated powers for beam1 and beam2 in Step 1.a were performed at an
arbitrary rotation of EUT in anechoic chamber, repeat Step 1.a of this procedure by rotating
the EUT to determine maximum radiated power at input.power.limit in FTM mode for both
beams separately. Re-scale the instantaneous radiated power recorded in Step 2.c by the delta
of radiated power measured in Step 5 and radiated power obtained in Step 1.a.
11. Make one plot containing: (a) instantaneous conducted Tx power for LTE versus time as
measured in Step 2, (b) instantaneous radiated Tx power for mmW versus time as obtained in
Step 5, (c) computed 4s-averaged radiated Tx power for mmW (using 6.b) versus time and
(d) time-averaged radiated Tx power limits for beam 1 and beam 2.
12. Make another plot containing: (a) computed normalized 100s-averaged 1gSAR versus time
determined in Step 3, (b) computed normalized 4s-averaged 4cm2PD versus time determined
in Step 4, and (c) corresponding total normalized time-averaged RF exposure (sum of steps
(6.a) and (6.b)) versus time.

80-W5669-2 Rev. B MAY CONTAIN U.S. AND INTERNATIONAL EXPORT CONTROLLED INFORMATION 14

Netgear 5G MHS Travel Router (FCC ID: PY319100441) RF Exposure Compliance Test Report (Part 2: Test Under Dynamic
Transmission Scenario) PD Time Averaging Validation Test Procedures
The validation criteria is, at all times, the total normalized time-averaged RF exposure versus
time determined in Step 6.c shall not exceed the normalized limit of 1.0 of FCC requirement (i.e.,
(3d)).

3.4 Test procedure for PD measurements
The following steps are used to perform the validation through PD measurement for test case 1
described in Section 2:
1. Place the EUT on the DASY platform to perform PD measurement in the worst-case
position/surface for the selected mmW band/beam/DSI. In PD measurement, the callbox is
set to request maximum mmW Tx power from EUT all the time. Hence, “path loss”
calibration between callbox antenna and EUT is not needed in this test.
2. Time averaging algorithm validation:
a. Measure conducted Tx power corresponding to Plimit for LTE in selected
band/channel/DSI, and measure point E-field corresponding to input.power.limit in
desired mmW band/channel/beam. Test condition to measure conducted Plimit and PD
(i.e., E-field) at input.power.limit is:
3. Measure conducted Tx power corresponding to LTE Plimit with Smart Transmit enabled and
Reserve_power_margin set to 0 dB, callbox set to request maximum power.
4. Measure point E-field at peak location of fast area scan corresponding to input.power.limit by
setting up the EUT to transmit in desired mmW band/channel/beam at input.power.limit in
FTM Mode. Do not disturb the position of EUT and mmW DASY probe.
a. Set Reserve_power_margin to actual value (i.e., intended value) and reset power on EUT,
place EUT in online mode. With EUT setup for LTE (sub-6) + mmW call, as soon as the
mmW connection is established, request all-down bits on LTE link. Continue LTE (all-
down bits) + mmW transmission for more than 100s duration to test predominantly PD
exposure scenario. After 120s, request LTE to go all-up bits, mmW transmission should
gradually reduce. Record the conducted Tx power of LTE and point relative E-field (i.e.,
[𝑝𝑜𝑖𝑛𝑡𝐸(𝑡)]2
ratio of [𝑝𝑜𝑖𝑛𝑡𝐸_𝑖𝑛𝑝𝑢𝑡.𝑝𝑜𝑤𝑒𝑟.𝑙𝑖𝑚𝑖𝑡]2) of mmW at peak location identified in Step 2.a.ii for
the entire duration of this test of ~300s.
b. Once the measurement is done, extract instantaneous Tx power versus time for LTE and
[𝑝𝑜𝑖𝑛𝑡𝐸(𝑡)]2
[𝑝𝑜𝑖𝑛𝑡𝐸_𝑖𝑛𝑝𝑢𝑡.𝑝𝑜𝑤𝑒𝑟.𝑙𝑖𝑚𝑖𝑡]2
versus time from DASY system for mmW. Convert the
conducted Tx power for LTE into 1gSAR value using Eq. (2a) and Plimit measured in Step
2.a.i, and then divide this by FCC limit of 1.6 W/kg for 1gSAR to obtain instantaneous
normalized 1gSAR versus time. Perform 100s running average to determine normalized
100s-averaged 1gSAR versus time.

NOTE: In Eq.(2a), instantaneous Tx power is converted into instantaneous 1gSAR value by applying the
worst-case 1gSAR value measured at Plimit for the corresponding technology/band reported in Part
1 report.

[𝑝𝑜𝑖𝑛𝑡𝐸(𝑡)]2
c. Similarly, convert the [𝑝𝑜𝑖𝑛𝑡𝐸_𝑖𝑛𝑝𝑢𝑡.𝑝𝑜𝑤𝑒𝑟.𝑙𝑖𝑚𝑖𝑡]2 for mmW into 4cm2PD value using Eq.
(2b) and radiated power limit measured in Step 2.a.ii, and then divide this by FCC

80-W5669-2 Rev. B MAY CONTAIN U.S. AND INTERNATIONAL EXPORT CONTROLLED INFORMATION 15

Netgear 5G MHS Travel Router (FCC ID: PY319100441) RF Exposure Compliance Test Report (Part 2: Test Under Dynamic
Transmission Scenario) PD Time Averaging Validation Test Procedures
4cm2PD limit of 10W/m2 to obtain instantaneous normalized 4cm2PD versus time.
Perform 4s running average to determine normalized 4s-averaged 4cm2PD versus time.

[𝑝𝑜𝑖𝑛𝑡𝐸(𝑡)]2
NOTE: In Eq.(2b), the instantaneous relative E-field (i.e., ratio of [𝑝𝑜𝑖𝑛𝑡𝐸_𝑖𝑛𝑝𝑢𝑡.𝑝𝑜𝑤𝑒𝑟.𝑙𝑖𝑚𝑖𝑡]2
) is converted
into instantaneous 4cm2PD by applying the corresponding worst-case 4cm2PD value measured at
the input.power.limit of beam 1 and beam 2 in Part 1 report.

d. Make one plot containing: (i) computed normalized 100s-averaged 1gSAR versus time
obtained in Step 2.c, (ii) computed normalized 4s-averaged 4cm2PD versus time
determined in Step 2.d, and (iii) corresponding total normalized time-averaged RF
exposure (sum of steps (2.e.i) and (2.e.ii)) versus time.
The validation criteria is, at all times, the total normalized time-averaged RF exposure versus
time determined in Step 2.e.iii shall not exceed the normalized limit of 1.0 of FCC
requirement (i.e., Eq. (2c)).

80-W5669-2 Rev. B MAY CONTAIN U.S. AND INTERNATIONAL EXPORT CONTROLLED INFORMATION 16

4 Test Configurations

4.1 LTE + mmW NR transmission
Based on the selection criteria described in Section 3.2, the selections for LTE and mmW NR
validation test are listed in Table 4-1. The radio configurations used in this test is listed in Table
4-2.

Table 4-1 Selections for LTE + mmW NR validation measurements
Transmission
Test Technology and Band mmW Beam
Scenario
Time-varying Cond. & Rad. Power meas.
Tx power test LTE Band 2 and n260 Beam ID 171
PD meas.
Switch in SAR Cond. & Rad. Power meas.
vs. PD LTE Band 2 and n260 Beam ID 171

Beam switch Cond. & Rad. Power meas. Beam ID 158 to Beam ID
test LTE Band 2 and n260
131

Table 4-2: Test configuration for LTE + mmW NR validation
UL Duty
Tech Band DSI Channel RB/offset Freq (MHz) Mode Cycle
LTE B2 15 18900 50 1880 QPSK 100%
mmW
n260 -- 2254147 28 38499 CP-OFDM, BPSK 75.6%
NR

80-W5669-2 Rev. B MAY CONTAIN U.S. AND INTERNATIONAL EXPORT CONTROLLED INFORMATION 17

5 Radiated Power Test Results for mmW
Smart Transmit Algorithm Validation

5.1 WWAN (sub-6) transmission
As discussed in Section 2, since maximum time-averaged power level Plimit ≥ Pmax (maximum RF
tune-up output power) for all supported 4G WWAN technologies/bands/DSI for this EUT, there
is no power limiting required if only 4G radio is active. Hence, the Tx varying transmission
scenario tests listed in Section 2 are performed for EN-DC, i.e., mmW NR + LTE radio, only in
this Part 2 report for Netgear 5G MHS Travel Router (FCC ID: PY319100441).

5.2 Measurement Setup
The Keysight Technologies E7515B UXM callbox is used in this test. The test setup is shown in
Figure 5-1a and the schematic of the setup is shown in Figure 5-1b. The UXM callbox has two
RF radio heads to up/down convert IF to mmW frequencies, which in turn are connected to two
horn antennas for V- and H-polarizations for downlink communication. In the uplink, a
directional coupler is used in the path of one of the horn antennas to measure and record radiated
power using a Rohde & Schwarz NR50S power sensor and NRP2 power meter. Note that since
the measurements performed in this validation are all relative, measurement of EUT’s radiated
power in one polarization is sufficient. The EUT is placed inside an anechoic chamber with V-
and H-pol horn antennas to establish the radio link as shown in Figure 5-1. The callbox’s LTE
port is directly connected to the EUT’s RF port via a directional coupler to measure the EUT’s
conducted Tx power using a Rohde & Schwarz NR8S power sensor and NRP2 power meter.
Additionally, EUT is connected to the PC via USB connection for sending beam switch
command. Care is taken to route the USB cable and RF cable (for LTE connection) away from
the EUT’s mmW antenna modules.
Setup in Figure 5-1 is used for the test scenario 1, 4 and 5 described in Section 2. The test
procedures described in Section 3 are followed. The path losses from the EUT to the power
meters are calibrated and used as offset in the power meter.

80-W5669-2 Rev. B MAY CONTAIN U.S. AND INTERNATIONAL EXPORT CONTROLLED INFORMATION 18

Netgear 5G MHS Travel Router (FCC ID: PY319100441) RF Exposure Compliance Test Report (Part 2: Test Under Dynamic
Transmission Scenario) PD Test Results for mmW Smart Transmit Algorithm Validation
5-1, exposure between 15s ~110s corresponds to a normalized 4cm2PD exposure value for Beam
ID 158 of (75% * 2.11 W/m2)/(10 W/m2) = 15.8% ± 2.8dB device related uncertainty between
15s~110s). At 110s~120s time mark (shown in black dotted ellipse), beam is switched to Beam
ID 131 resulting in a normalized 4cm2PD exposure value of (75% * 1.12 W/m2)/(10 W/m2) =
8.4% ± 2.8dB device related uncertainty. Additionally, during the switch, the ratio between the
averaged radiated powers of the two beams (yellow curve) should correspond to the ratio of
EIRPs measured at each corresponding input.power.limit (within ±2.8dB device uncertainty) for
these beams listed in Table 5-1.

As can be seen, the power limiting enforcement is effective during beam switches and the total
normalized time-averaged RF exposure does not exceed 1.0. Therefore, Qualcomm Smart
Transmit time averaging algorithm is validated

6 PD Test Results for mmW Smart
Transmit Algorithm Validation

6.1 Measurement setup
The measurement setup is similar to normal PD measurements, the EUT is positioned on DASY
platform, and is connected with the callbox (conducted for LTE and wirelessly for mmW).
Keysight UXM callbox is set to request maximum mmW Tx power from EUT all the time.
Hence, “path loss” calibration between callbox antenna and EUT is not needed in this test. The
callbox’s LTE port is directly connected to the EUT’s RF port via a directional coupler to
measure the EUT’s conducted Tx power using a Rohde & Schwarz NR8S power sensor and
NRP2 power meter. Additionally, EUT is connected to the PC via USB connection for toggling
between FTM and online mode with Smart Transmit enabled following the test procedures
described Section 3.4.
Worst-surface of EUT (for the mmW beam being tested) is positioned facing up for PD
measurement with DASY mmW probe as shown in Figure 6-1. Figure 6-2 shows the schematic of
this measurement setup.

80-W5669-2 Rev. B MAY CONTAIN U.S. AND INTERNATIONAL EXPORT CONTROLLED INFORMATION 25

Netgear 5G MHS Travel Router (FCC ID: PY319100441) RF Exposure Compliance Test Report (Part 2: Test Under Dynamic
Transmission Scenario) PD Test Results for mmW Smart Transmit Algorithm Validation
probe at peak location of fast area scan. The distance between EUmmWV2 mmW probe tip to
EUT surface is ~0.5 mm, and the distance between EUmmWV2 mmW probe sensor to probe tip
is 1.5 mm. Appendix B furthermore detailed the steps for performing time-averaged E-field
measurements using cDASY6 measurement system used for this validation. cDASY6 records
relative point E-field values at mmW frequencies periodically every 0.1s seconds.

6.2 PD measurement results for maximum power
transmission scenario
The configuration of LTE Band 2 (DSI =15) and mmW n260 Beam ID 171 was measured by
following the detailed test procedure is described in Section 5.4.
Similar to the maximum transmit power test described in Section 5.3.1., by applying LTE 1gSAR
of 1.16 W/kg at 24.0dBm, 4cm2PD at input.power.limit of 2.69 W/m2, the measured conducted
[𝑝𝑜𝑖𝑛𝑡𝐸(𝑡)]2
Tx power of LTE and ratio of [𝑝𝑜𝑖𝑛𝑡𝐸_𝑖𝑛𝑝𝑢𝑡.𝑝𝑜𝑤𝑒𝑟.𝑙𝑖𝑚𝑖𝑡]2 of mmW is converted into 1gSAR(t) and
4cm2PD(t) value, respectively, using Eq. (2a) and (2b), rewritten below:
𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑑𝑢𝑐𝑡𝑒𝑑_𝑇𝑥_𝑝𝑜𝑤𝑒𝑟(𝑡)
1𝑔_𝑜𝑟_10𝑔𝑆𝐴𝑅(𝑡) = ∗ 1𝑔_𝑜𝑟_10𝑔𝑆𝐴𝑅_𝑃𝑙𝑖𝑚𝑖𝑡 (2a)
𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑑𝑢𝑐𝑡𝑒𝑑_𝑇𝑥_𝑝𝑜𝑤𝑒𝑟_𝑃𝑙𝑖𝑚𝑖𝑡

[𝑝𝑜𝑖𝑛𝑡𝐸(𝑡)]2
4𝑐𝑚2 𝑃𝐷(𝑡) = [𝑝𝑜𝑖𝑛𝑡𝐸_𝑖𝑛𝑝𝑢𝑡.𝑝𝑜𝑤𝑒𝑟.𝑙𝑖𝑚𝑖𝑡]2
∗ 4𝑐𝑚2 𝑃𝐷_𝑖𝑛𝑝𝑢𝑡. 𝑝𝑜𝑤𝑒𝑟. 𝑙𝑖𝑚𝑖𝑡 (2b)

1 𝑡 1 𝑡
∫
𝑇𝑆𝐴𝑅 𝑡−𝑇𝑆𝐴𝑅
1𝑔_𝑜𝑟_10𝑔𝑆𝐴𝑅(𝑡)𝑑𝑡 ∫ 4𝑐𝑚2 𝑃𝐷(𝑡)𝑑𝑡
𝑇𝑃𝐷 𝑡−𝑇𝑃𝐷
+ ≤1 (2c)
𝐹𝐶𝐶 𝑆𝐴𝑅 𝑙𝑖𝑚𝑖𝑡 𝐹𝐶𝐶 4𝑐𝑚2 𝑃𝐷𝑙𝑖𝑚𝑖𝑡

Where, 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑑𝑢𝑐𝑡𝑒𝑑_𝑇𝑥_𝑝𝑜𝑤𝑒𝑟(𝑡), 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑑𝑢𝑐𝑡𝑒𝑑_𝑇𝑥_𝑝𝑜𝑤𝑒𝑟_𝑃𝑙𝑖𝑚𝑖𝑡 , and 1𝑔𝑆𝐴𝑅_𝑃𝑙𝑖𝑚𝑖𝑡
correspond to the measured instantaneous conducted Tx power, measured conducted Tx
power at Plimit, and measured 1gSAR values at Plimit. Similarly, 𝑝𝑜𝑖𝑛𝑡𝐸(𝑡),
𝑝𝑜𝑖𝑛𝑡𝐸_𝑖𝑛𝑝𝑢𝑡. 𝑝𝑜𝑤𝑒𝑟. 𝑙𝑖𝑚𝑖𝑡, and 4𝑐𝑚2 𝑃𝐷@𝑖𝑛𝑝𝑢𝑡. 𝑝𝑜𝑤𝑒𝑟. 𝑙𝑖𝑚𝑖𝑡 correspond to the measured
instantaneous E-field, E-field at input.power.limit, and 4cm2PD value at input.power.limit.

NOTE: If Plimit ≥ Pmax, 1gSAR or 10gSAR measured at Plimit shall be replaced with 1gSAR or 10gSAR
measured at Pmax.

[𝑝𝑜𝑖𝑛𝑡𝐸(𝑡)]2
NOTE: cDASY6 system measures relative E-field, and provides ratio of [𝑝𝑜𝑖𝑛𝑡𝐸_𝑖𝑛𝑝𝑢𝑡.𝑝𝑜𝑤𝑒𝑟.𝑙𝑖𝑚𝑖𝑡]2 versus
time. See Appendix A for measurement details.

6.2.1 PD test results for n260
Step 2.e plot (in Section 5.4) for normalized time-averaged exposures for LTE and mmW n260
beam 23:

80-W5669-2 Rev. B MAY CONTAIN U.S. AND INTERNATIONAL EXPORT CONTROLLED INFORMATION 27

7 Conclusions

Qualcomm Smart Transmit feature for managing time-averaging of RF exposure, employed in
Netgear 5G MHS Travel Router (FCC ID: PY319100441) has been validated through the
conducted/radiated power measurement (as demonstrated in Section 5), as well as PD
measurement (as demonstrated in Section 6).
As demonstrated in this report, the power limiting enforcement is effective and the total
normalized time-averaged RF exposure does not exceed 1.0 for all the transmission scenarios
described in Section 2.
In conclusion, all transmission scenarios that EUT supports comply with FCC time-averaged RF
exposure requirement.

80-W5669-2 Rev. B MAY CONTAIN U.S. AND INTERNATIONAL EXPORT CONTROLLED INFORMATION 29

Document Created: 2019-05-14 12:34:16
Document Modified: 2019-05-14 12:34:16

© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC